My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0818_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0818_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:02:47 PM
Creation date
8/14/2014 1:54:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c.The minimum parking lot setback adjacent to park land and/or low-district <br />256 <br />residential district shall be 10 feet, which area shall consist of landscaping, an <br />257 <br />opaque screen fence, or a combination thereof. <br />258 <br />Property Performance Standards <br />259 <br />Initially the Planning Division proposed new standards for food trucks, however, the <br />260 <br />Planning Commission desired additional information and clarification regarding the <br />261 <br />standards for food trucks. The Commission kept in the definition of food truck in the <br />262 <br />proposed amendments, but tabled the standards from consideration until a later date. <br />263 <br />6.0PC <br />UBLICOMMENT <br />264 <br />The duly-noticed public hearing for this application was held by the Planning <br />265 <br />Commission at its meeting of June 4, 2014; draft minutes of the meeting are included <br />266 <br />with this RCA as Attachment D. Commissioners expressed support for the proposed <br />267 <br />amendments, however, they did have a few questions of the City Planner, as well as a <br />268 <br />few proposed changes. <br />269 <br />Most of the Planning Commissions questions and comments were centered on food truck <br />270 <br />regulations, while Commissioners also commented on the development standards <br />271 <br />including environmental review, park and residential buffers, and retail conditional use <br />272 <br />standards. <br />273 <br />The Planning Commission voted, 6 – 0, to recommend approval of the proposed text <br />274 <br />amendments, as modified. <br />275 <br />7.0SCCA <br />UGGESTEDITYOUNCILCTION <br />276 <br />Adopt an Ordinance <br />amending the text within Section 1001.10 (Definitions), Table <br />277 <br />1005-1, Section 1005.07 (Community Mixed-Use District), and Section 1009.02, <br />278 <br />(Conditional Use), to be consistent with Section 5 of this report. <br />279 <br />8.0ACA <br />LTERNATIVEOUNCILCTIONS <br />280 <br />Pass a motion to table the item for future action. <br /> Tabling the item should be <br />281 <br />accompanied by specific directives of the City Council and to a date certain, preferably <br />282 <br />on a docket in July. <br />283 <br />Pass a motion, to deny the requested approvals. <br /> Denial should be supported by <br />284 <br />specific findings of fact based on the City Council’s review of the application, applicable <br />285 <br />zoning regulations, and the public record. <br />286 <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke 651-792-7074 | thomas.paschke@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Attachments: A: Draft PC minutes <br />Draft Ordinance <br />B: <br />PROJ0026_RCA_TextAmdts_070714 <br />Page 12 of 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.