Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. ' <br /> <br />Section 1016.20 outlines the criteria and procedure for considering a variance in a <br />shoreland management overlay district. <br /> <br />3.0 STAFF COMMENT <br /> <br />3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 1016.16A, City Code, requires all structures to be setback a <br />minimum of 75 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Lake <br />Josephine, a general development lake. The existing accessory structure is <br />set back 20 feet from the OHWL of Lake Josephine and the existing principal <br />structure is set back 30 feet. <br /> <br />2. Section 1016.268, City Code, requires a maximum impervious surface <br />coverage of 25 percent for properties within a shoreland management <br />district. The existing impervious surface coverage of the property is 58 <br />percent and the proposed impervious surface coverage is 68 percent. <br /> <br />3. Since the principal structure does not meet the required setback from the <br />OHWL, it is classified as a nonconforming structure. Section 1016.22 <br />requires all additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of a <br />nonconforming structure to meet the setback, height and other requirements <br />of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16, unless a variance is granted pursuant <br />to Section 1016.20. <br /> <br />4. The substandard non-conforming size of the parcel (6,545 square feet) and <br />the location of the principal structure creates practical difficulty and is a <br />hardship. Because of the nonconforming status of the structure, any <br />addition(s) which would expand the exterior dimensions of the structure <br />would not be allowed. This presents practical difficulty in upgrading and <br />improving the existing residential property. <br /> <br />5. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, through Area Hydrologist <br />Molly Shodeen, expressed concerns that the addition would be closer to the <br />OHWL than the rest of the dwelling and that the addition would substantially <br />increase the impervious surface coverage of the lot. She indicated that the <br />DNR would support a variance to construct the addition in line with the <br />existing dwelling, which would not encroach further into the required setback <br />from the OHWL of Lake Josephine. She also indicated that the DNR would <br />support a variance from the impervious lot coverage requirement in order to <br />construct the proposed addition in line with the existing dwelling. <br /> <br />6. The proposed variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent <br />of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning); <br />however, a variance to reduce the setback from the OHWL to 30 feet in order <br />to construct an addition in line with the existing dwelling and to increase the <br /> <br />PF#2925 - RPCA (07/09/97) - Page 3 of 4 <br />