Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-- t~ t., ~ I ; <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE <br />SUBJ= <br /> <br />FAX: <br /> <br />1L.1: <br />. <br />I <br /> <br />" JI ~~;iIJ;:' j'tf it... i r I! d.lliII". <br /> <br />KIM LEE <br />JAMES, R. AND JEAN R. BRISBROIS <br />11 NOV 97 <br />CITY PLANNING FILE: No. 2936 <br />PROJEC1' NAME: LACHER VARIANCE <br /> <br />490.2a36 <br /> <br />IN REGARDS TO TIm SUBJECT, WEARE OPPOSED TO ANY VARIANCE TO THE <br />PROPERTY AT THIS TIME. WB HA VB CONCLUDED THAT PART OF THE BUILDINGS <br />ARE ON OUR PROPERTY. AS SUCH, WE ARE CONTACTING ALL THE TITLE <br />INSURANCE COMPANIES INVOLVED IN THIS MA'ITER. WE WILL NOT GIVE ANY <br />FASEMFNf AILOW,lNG ANY PART OF ANY BUIlDING OR STRUCTURE ON OUR <br />PROPERTY. IT Wn..(. TAKE A COURT TO GRANT AN ADVERSE EASEMENT BBR>RB <br />WE ALLOW OUR PROPERTY TO BE VIOLATED. WE WILL ATTEND THE MBBTING <br />ON 12 NOV 97. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />BEFORE ANY OF TIlTS GOF.8 TO COURT. WE ASK THAT THE PLANN1NG <br />COMMISSION D~Y ANY DECISION ON THIS MA'ITER UNTIL IT IS RESOLVED BY <br />THE TITLE COMPA}ljUES ANDIOR THE COURTS. WE WIlL ALLOW THE I..ACHERS <br />TO USE THE DRIVEWAY UNTIL THE MATTER IS RESOLVED. <br /> <br />AS A MA'ITER OF COURSE, WHY WOULD THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALLOW A <br />VARIANCE AFffiR THB FACT? IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS MAITER <br />IS TO BE RESOLVED 8ER>RE CONSTRUCI10N. <br /> <br /> <br />ROO::r~ <br />