Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Kim L. Lee, AICP <br />City Planner <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />in its present location. <br />2. There is not a variance on record that allowed the addition to the house to <br />be placed in such a manner that the overhang extends over the property line. <br />3. He feels that his property rights were inftinged upon when the curb cuts and <br />pad were installed in 1990 and that he may have paid too much in special <br />assessments. <br />b. He wants to have the five foot variance required by code to stand. In other words, he <br />wants five feet between our driveway and his property. <br /> <br />We feel that given these circumstances the requirement for a major variance should be <br />waived. The fact that we will possibly lose a favorable bid to replace our driveway, along with <br />the time and energy spent in obtaining this bid and others, would be a loss to us if we fail to act on <br />the bid during this season. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Debra A. Lacher <br /> <br />f).du a. ~ <br />