My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0825_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0825_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 3:21:30 PM
Creation date
8/21/2014 2:51:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Last October, the Council adopted a Policy outlining the calculation used to determine future COLA’s <br />34 <br />for non-union employees. That Policy stated that the COLA will be based primarily on the following: <br />35 <br />36 <br />U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U for the Minneapolis/St. Paul statistical area. <br />37 <br />38 <br />In addition, the Council also agreed for purposes of discussion to consider the following index: <br />39 <br />40 <br />U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index (ECI) - State and Local workers <br />41 <br />** Note: the BLS does not publish a local or regional statistic for this index. They also use a different calendar <br />42 <br />measurement year than they do for the CPI. <br />43 <br />44 <br />The most recent 12-month calculations are as follows: <br />45 <br />46 <br />1.44% <br />CPI-U – <br />(July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014) <br />47 <br />ECI-state and local government – 1.20% <br />(April 1, 2013 – March 31, 2014) <br />48 <br />49 <br />The Council is reminded that the CPI and ECI measure two completely different things. The CPI <br />50 <br />measures the change in prices consumers pay for a specific basket of goods and services. It is <br />51 <br />commonly used for purposes of COLA as an indicator of what the employee needs to get paid in order <br />52 <br />to keep their purchasing power the same over time – i.e. to avoid an effective wage cut due to <br />53 <br />inflationary impacts. <br />54 <br />55 <br />In contrast, the ECI measures the aggregate changes in the costs of labor including wages and <br />56 <br />benefits. It includes full-time, part-time, and temporary/seasonal workers. It is not a measure of the <br />57 <br />raises workers received during the measurement period. This index can be influenced by layoffs, <br />58 <br />reductions in work hours and overtime, and increased utilization of PT/temporary/seasonal workers. <br />59 <br />60 <br />Staff is unaware of any cities that use the ECI for purposes of determining an employee COLA. In <br />61 <br />contrast, the CPI is widely used. <br />62 <br />63 <br />2015 Tax Levy Impacts <br />64 <br />The 2015 City Manager Recommended Budget calls for a property tax increase of $890,829. This is <br />65 <br />detailed in the chart below. <br />66 <br />2015 Tax Levy Impacts <br />67 <br />68 <br />2015 <br />Budget Impact Item Description / Comments Amount <br />Employer PERA Contribution Mandated contribution increase for Employees $ 67,000 <br />** <br />Employee COLA Based on 2% cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA) 245,000 <br />Employee wage step increases Eligible employees under the Compensation Plan 129,000 <br />Fire Department Reorganization Net cost of hiring additional FT firefighters 69,000 <br />EAB Removal Add’l monies for program 25,000 <br />Capital replacements – New Based on Staff recommendations (per memo) 55,000 <br />General inflation - Capital Inflation on scheduled capital replacements 5,000 <br />General inflation - Operations Inflation on supplies, professional services, etc. 150,829 <br />Eliminate Use of Reserves General Fund reserves used to balance the budget 346,000 <br />Eliminate Use of Reserves Recreation Fund reserves used to balance the budget 30,000 <br />Reduction - Debt Service City Hall Bond Refunding Savings (annual) (60,000) <br />Reduction - Debt Service Street Bond #25 Paid Off (160,000) <br />Reduction - Fire Relief Contribution Projected decrease per revised actuarial study (11,000) <br />Total Impact $ 890,829 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.