Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,' <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 22nd day of September, <br />1997, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />i <br />The following members were present: Goedeke, Maschka, Mastel, Wall, and Wiski; and <br />the following members were absent: None. <br /> <br />Council Member Wiski introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9461 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION VACATING A UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT <br />DEDICATED ON THE PLAT OF <br />CENTRE POINTE BUSINESS PARK <br /> <br />i <br />WHEREAS, after two weeks published and posted notice, the Planning Commissidn <br />held a public hearing on September 10, 1997, to determine whether or not a portion of saId <br />utility and drainage easement in the City of Roseville should be vacated; and . <br />I <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it appears that by reason of changes in the use of the surrounding lan~, <br />it would be beneficial to the public interest to vacate a portion of said utility and drainage <br />I <br />easement; I <br />i <br />I <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rosevill~, <br />Minnesota, hereby vacates that portion of the utility and drainage easement dedicated qn <br />the plat of Centre Pointe Business Park and described in Exhibit A, contingent upon the <br />dedication of a new utility and drainage easement and movement of the existing sanitary <br />sewer line in this location. i <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new utility and drainage easement, as described 1Jn <br />Exhibit B, be accepted. <br />i <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Memb~r <br />Wiski, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Goedekfl , <br />Maschka, Mastel, Wiskl and Wall; and the following voted against same: None <br /> <br /> <br />Resolution 9461. Page Il2 <br /> <br />..... '. <br />. ,. <br /> <br />. ., <br />