Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 06/27/00 <br />ITEM NO: <br />~~t Approval: Manager Approved: Agenda Section: <br />~ CONSENT <br />Item Description: 18 Month Report on Taco Bell Hours of Operation <br />(PF2963) <br /> <br />1.0 BACKGROUND <br /> <br />1.1 When the Roseville Shopping Center was approved in March 1998, a stipulation ill the <br />Planned Unit Developmeflt (PUD) was that the City staff would review the hours of <br />operations of the Taco Bell (1101 Larpenteur Avenue) 18 months after occupancy. <br />Specifically, the PUD states: <br /> <br />"...Any use on Lot 1, including the proposed restaurant, shall not operate past 12 <br />midnight on Sunday through Thursday or past 1:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. <br />These hours of operation shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director <br />within J 8 months of the date a business opens on this site, with a report being <br />submitted to the Planning Commission and the City Council. Based upon the findings <br />of this report (which will review parking, traffic, noise, light and any police record), <br />the City Council may modify the hours of operation. " <br /> <br />1.2 The building was occupied and opened in November, 1998. <br /> <br />1.3 While the site may look only partially finished (May, 2000), in the summer and fall of2000 <br />the final street and landscape materials will be installed surrounding Taco Bell. This will <br />include street trees, a brick paved area, planter beds and a new bus shelter. The parking area, <br />the street views and the drive thru lanes should look much more complete at that time. <br /> <br />2.0 STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />2.1 Sta!fhas reviewed City land use records and police records and have found the following: <br /> <br />2.1. r. Police Department: Police records, submitted by Tom Alleva, Roseville Assistant <br />Police Clllef, indicate that during the 18-month period from January 1, 1999 through <br />May 29, 2000, there were a total of 9 police calls. (and 11 false, security system <br />alarms). The incidents that required police attention (other than false alarms with the <br />security system) occurred from 10: lOam to 1 :45pm. None occurred in the late <br />evening. The subject to of the incidents included 1 property damage; 1 traffic <br />accidentIDWIlresisting arrest; ~ public assistance call; and l-car lock out. Calls <br />received by the St. Paul Police I garding incidents at the Taco Bell would have been <br />forwarded to the Roseville polIce and are accounted for in the Roseville records. <br />According to Assistant Chief Alleva, during this time period there were no <br />significant calls made to Taco Bell by the Department. <br /> <br />2.1.2. Land Use Code Complaints: No parking or land use complaints were received after ~ <br />the opening of the new Taco Bell. The layout appears to be functioning efficiently. <br /> <br />PF2963 - RCA_TacoBel1(062700)) Page 1 of2 <br />