My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-07-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014-07-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2014 11:45:52 AM
Creation date
8/29/2014 11:45:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/22/2014
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Costs for intersections as displayed in cross section examples for <br /> Cleveland Avenue, I-35W and Twin Lakes Parkway and as cost <br /> breakdown of materials, engineering, labor and other costs for those proposed <br /> construction projects (Gjerdingen). Member Gjerdingen stated that he was <br /> curious if double left turn lanes would affect walkability depending on the <br /> width of those lanes. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that numbers were still preliminary at this stage, and <br /> refined numbers would be available in the future, but not at this time, since the <br /> designs were only preliminary at this stage for Phase III. Mr. Schwartz <br /> recommended that this be a conversation for later on, as proposals for <br /> professional consulting services were just due later this week, and it would be <br /> 2-3 months after City Council award on August 11, 2014, for the consultant to <br /> perform their work. <br /> Mr. Culver concurred, noting that the only numbers available at this time <br /> would be broad estimates based on preliminary layouts. Mr. Culver noted that <br /> once the consultant was hired and provided a detailed design, those refined <br /> numbers and cross sections would be provided to the PWETC. <br /> • Current zoning applications for parking lots (sizes and number of stalls) <br /> for retail and office applications, specifically how it related to permeable <br /> surfaces, storm water management, walkability, and available transit <br /> (Cihacek). Member Cihacek stated that he was interested in learning about the <br /> general scope of the ratio of parking to land use, and how the City's other <br /> goals were accomplished, based on changing allocations for developments and <br /> environmental impacts, shared parking options, and transit corridor changes, <br /> all within emerging trends and how the City could support those trends <br /> through its zoning qualifications. <br /> Member Gjerdingen noted that the City of Arden Hills was looking at shared <br /> parking options; and suggested part of this discussion include on-street <br /> parking in Roseville as well. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that the previous ratio for parking was five to seven <br /> spaces per 1,000 square feet of building; but it had been reduced in current <br /> ordinance to three to four spaces for that same square footage. Mr. Schwartz <br /> noted that there were a number of issues related to parking, and suggested this <br /> would be another good discussion with the Community Development <br /> Department. <br /> Member Cihacek noted that, his main concern was, that commercial land use <br /> produced a considerable share of the City's storm water runoff, and suggested <br /> looking at more ways to mitigate that through infrastructure, etc. <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.