Laserfiche WebLink
communities, Mr. Culver advised that he found nothing defining or clarifying <br /> higher restrictions for the use of bikes on sidewalks. Mr. Culver noted that the <br /> City of Minneapolis stenciled sidewalk areas in their business districts where <br /> bicycles were prohibited, but St. Paul was silent on that point. In performing a <br /> "Google" search on that issue, Mr. Culver advised that he found that a lot of <br /> people thought bicycles should not be allowed on sidewalks, and some already <br /> thought it was against the law. Mr. Culver reported that there appeared to be a <br /> considerable amount of confusion among the public. <br /> Discussion included how the City of Roseville defined pathways (separations of <br /> multi-use trails/pathways generally 8' or wider and blacktop) versus sidewalks <br /> (5'-6' and concrete); differences in recreational and commuter bicycle uses and <br /> needs; whether defining uses and protocol to avoid conflicts for those mixed use <br /> facilities would be a worthwhile public relations initiative by the PWETC to <br /> ensure their safest and most effective use; and the definition of pathways by <br /> Roseville in its 2008 Master Pathway Plan. <br /> Mr. Culver duly noted the suggested public relations and educational initiative for <br /> sharing in a future City News newsletter and on the City's website; with Member <br /> Lenz suggesting public education efforts with back to school articles in the <br /> Roseville Review, would also be good timing and would possibly encourage more <br /> users. <br /> Member Felice agreed with the need for good education, relating some of her <br /> observations in bicyclers not following the rules, creating additional hazards for <br /> vehicles on the roads and at intersections as well as for pedestrians. <br /> At Member Wozniak's suggestion for additional signage on trails and/or <br /> sidewalks, Mr. Culver noted the cost of installation and maintenance of signage, <br /> and questioned how to designate differences in why or where that signage would <br /> occur, exceptions and other problematic issues along with State law already in <br /> place defining rights and rules. Mr. Culver advised that State law dictated that <br /> bicycles on sidewalks were under the same rules as pedestrians and, while <br /> vehicles were required to yield to pedestrians at crosswalks, it was prudent for <br /> pedestrians or bicyclers to verify their safe crossing. Specific to bicyclers on <br /> sidewalks or trails, Mr. Culver advised that they had the same responsibilities as <br /> pedestrians; but when on roadways having a designated or marked bicycle lane, <br /> then the laws and rights were different, and they were considered another vehicle <br /> on the roadway. Mr. Culver emphasized the need for bikers, pedestrians and <br /> drivers all needing to be aware of their responsibilities. Mr. Culver noted that this <br /> was an ongoing struggle within that industry to be consistent between facilities. <br /> Further discussion included rationale for Ramsey County's plan to install a <br /> dedicated east bound right turn only lane versus a dedicated left turn lane on <br /> County Road B-2 at Lexington Avenue as a more efficient traffic movement <br /> system than split phased signal timing. <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br />