My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-07-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014-07-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2014 11:45:52 AM
Creation date
8/29/2014 11:45:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/22/2014
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parkway and other improvements; and remaining decisions in how to fund the <br /> remaining $4 million in transportation improvements needed. Mr. Culver <br /> reviewed other options available besides TIF, including assessing benefitting <br /> properties, using Municipal State Aid (MSA) dollars, which would affect and <br /> impact their use for other roadway maintenance, or use of General Fund dollars. <br /> At the request of Member Cihacek, Mr. Culver reviewed pros and cons of using <br /> assessments versus TIF and the methodology in identifying and assigning costs <br /> per parcel, as some would benefit more than others. Mr. Culver reviewed State <br /> Statute requirements and the process under Chapter 429 for assessing those <br /> benefits; and the geographic district already established for TIF, and remaining <br /> $800,000 estimated in that TIF Fund that was already committed to the project. <br /> At the request of Member Wozniak, Mr. Schwartz advised that staff would need <br /> to research and report back to the PWETC on whether or not it would be feasible <br /> or prudent to extend the TIF District for additional years. <br /> Member Wozniak stated that he was concerned about assessments to properties <br /> discouraging development, but would not rule it out completely if there was <br /> benefit to properties, and no other options were available. <br /> Mr. Schwartz clarified that developers were asked to contribute to improvements <br /> as part of a Development Agreement for each property, provided their <br /> development project triggered such a process and allowed the City some leverage. <br /> However, Mr. Schwartz noted that there was not a consistent process in place for <br /> those developments requiring them to install or improve infrastructure unless <br /> those triggers were met. <br /> Member Seigler noted that the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area represented one <br /> of the last primer areas of real estate in Roseville. <br /> Mr. Culver concurred, however, he noted that any site in Roseville could be <br /> subject to redevelopment given the right opportunity; and while little virgin land <br /> was available in Roseville, there were large areas suitable for re-use and <br /> redevelopment, even though the Twin Lakes area provided a good opportunity to <br /> start from scratch, but dependent on those uses refreshing on their own, since the <br /> City could not force redevelopment. However, Mr. Culver opined that, over time <br /> and as land values increased with more development occurring around existing <br /> uses, the land values would increase even more and it would then make sense for <br /> those property owners to redevelopment their parcels. <br /> At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Culver briefly reviewed the methodology <br /> in using TIF, with tax captured on the original use and multi-year deferment of <br /> the improved property without any payback while still having increased service <br /> and maintenance needs to address, creating additional demand for services on the <br /> General Fund that were not being funded. <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.