Laserfiche WebLink
<br />03/27/9" T.'T>I' ",.,,, ..'.. w, ".,... '(",'" ....!J\.b.!\.;)Ul' \JLL.L.11...~"'.I.I <br />. . RPR 02 '98 09:03RM PET, BELL,CONV,JENS~ <br /> <br />P. 2/4'""'" VV_ <br /> <br />MALKERSON GILLILAND MARTIN Ll.P <br /> <br />SUITt; 1:500 AT&T iowf:Q <br />5101 M....CUETTI!: AIIENUE <br />M,..",r;."OL.IS, MINNlC30TA S5402-320S <br />T~L.e:~HON~ 6'2.344'1111 <br />F"'CSIM.L.I;; 6';'>-344-1414 <br /> <br />Bn.ta: D. Malkerson, E$q. <br />Direct Dial No. 612-344-1699 <br /> <br />March 27.1998 <br /> <br />Mr. Robert Bell <br />333 South 7th Street <br />Suite 3000 <br />Minneapolis> MN 55402 <br /> <br />Re: City ofR.osevilleIFranchise Associates, Inc. <br />Our File No. 1030.:002 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Bell: <br /> <br />The undersigned represents Franchise Associates, Inc. (''FAI'J. Mr. Kennedy> vice-president <br />ofF AI. reviewed with me recently the results of an application made by FAlin ~he City ofRoscville <br />for a conditional use peanit C'CUP') to cOnstnlct a new Arby's/Sbarro re5ta.urant on a location <br />when~ there already was an Alby's restaurant and a free-standing sign related thereto. <br /> <br />I understand that the City Council approved the CUP but with a condition that the existing <br />sign be eliminated and r~laced with a conforming sign. My client has objected to that condition. <br /> <br />The existing non-conformiti~s relate to setback, size of sign. and overall height of sign. <br /> <br />I have revic::wed the record before the City and the City ordinances and I can find no legal <br />reasons to support that condition. We ask therefore that the City Council amend the CUP by <br />amending Condition Number 6 which reads as follows; <br /> <br /><<6. All sign age for the project must comply with the cUITent <br />requirements of Section 1009 of the City Code, including the size and <br />location ofwall signs and directional signs." <br /> <br />!5%2BDM <br />