Laserfiche WebLink
<br />qualities worthy of preservation. They are more vulnerable to external influences than <br />other residential areas that were redeveloped to accommodate the Crossroads, <br />Loehmann's Plaza, and Pavilion Place projects near Rosedale Center. Other <br />instances where already established residential areas were redeveloped for non- <br />residential uses include the Centre Pointe and Gateway projects. In some of these <br />residential areas there was a semblance of neighborhood. The four subject homes <br />east of Hamline Avenue interface with a 6-story office building, a concrete industrial <br />plant, and a high traffic library. all commercial uses. <br /> <br />In addition to its history of redeveloping several residential areas for office, commercial, <br />or industrial redevelopment uses, there are numerous examples of other properties in <br />the City of Roseville where office and even commercial retail uses co-exist adjacent to <br />single-family residential neighborhoods. Among these examples are the Water's Edge <br />office building, Har Mar Mall, Roseville Crossroads Shopping Center, Rosedale <br />Commons Shopping Center, Jubilee Foods Grocery Store, Super America station at <br />Lexington/County Road B, and NCR headquarters office facility on County Road C and <br />Pascal. <br /> <br />In 1986, the City commissioned a study by Public Financial Systems to evaluate seven <br />areas within the City where redevelopment might reasonably be expected to occur. <br />The purpose of the study was to establish appropriate land uses for each of the seven <br />areas and to identify the financial means to have the City assist with redevelopment <br />efforts, The Consultant concluded that some amount of redevelopment should occur <br />on the east side of Hamline Avenue, with particular emphasis on the Chandler-Wilbert <br />Burial Vault facility. The PFS study concluded that medical or professional office <br />buildings would be appropriate redevelopment uses on the east side of Hamline <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />The City's Planning Consultant, Howard Dahlgren, was asked to critique the PFS study <br />and he did so in a memo dated January 8, 1987, termed Comments On "Target Study <br />Areas" City of Roseville, prepared by Public Financial Systems, Inc. Planning <br />Consultant Dahlgren's comments show recognition that the houses that then remained <br />(10 years ago) on Hamline Avenue represented a negative neighborhood influence <br />because their future disposition was, as yet, undecided, He also acknowledged the <br />inevitability that this residential area will be redeveloped for other uses. The following <br />are quotes from Mr. Dahlgren's memo dated January 8, 1987: <br /> <br />~The most important objective in considering the appropriate land use for the <br />redevelopment of this site is the preservation of the neighborhood interest. This <br />means two things: one, the absolute prevention of the penetration of any traffic <br />into the neighborhood residential street system, and two, the control of the <br />structure mass (or structure masses) so as to prevent a deleterious impact on <br />the existing well-established single family neighborhood to the east." <br /> <br />Lf- <br />