pf_02978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

......... . . b12S3b01::Jj EUi::R!:::.1 bF.UUI-' jIJ 1 j-'k).:; ..i HI'! 10 . ';to It..,~~'! Page Two January 16. 1998 Kim L. Lee, AICP City of Roseville We subsequently found out that staff leaked information concerning our informal discussions to City Council members, which prompted Council member Goedeke to distort the information for use as an eJection campaign issue and to foment fear and opposition among the Dellwood Avenue neighbors. On November 7, 1997. '\/\Ie submitted a Comprehensive Plan amendment application for our 3.2-acre property only. In mid-November, Mr. Sarkozy andlor Dennis Welsch scheduled a City Council work session regarding Everest's property without telling Everest and contrary to Everest's written requests. At the November 17 Council work session, among other misstatements. staff mischaracterized Everest's preliminary discussions as a TIF proposal and omitted Everest correspondence from the planning packet At the meeting Council member Goedeke falsely portrayed the "project" as a "10-story" building and other Council members disparaged a supposed "project" that Everest had not applied for nor proposed and was not properly before the City. What ~ before the City was our Comp Plan amendment application submitted ten (10) days earlier and covering only our property. Challenged on the inadequate notice the day after the work session, Dennis Welsh falsely claimed that the City had faxed notice of the meeting to Everest the previous Friday. No evidence of such a fax transmittal has been produced. Our own facsimile records show no such a transmittal was received. The staff report prepared by Mr. Welsh for the January 14 Planning Commission review 01 Everest's application was biased, lacking in legitimate planning rationale, and in recommending denial of the application, set forth as -findings" conelusory opinions without supporting factual basis. The staff report wholly disregarded the substantia! body of professional planning and appraiser opinions submitted with the application which establish that the character and highest and best use of the property is commercial office, and the numerous policy references in the Comprehensive Plan which reinforce the importance of business development, job creation and tax base. The traffic "analysis" included in the staff report was speculative and deficient. as exemplified by the fact that Everest's traffic consultant showed that traffic volumes on Hamllne Avenue would be less upon full development of a 50,000 square foot office building on our site, even if 100% occupied by medicaJJdental users, than they '\Nere in 1985, owing to a decrease in Hamline Avenue traffic from 1985 to the present.