My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02978
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:27:19 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2978
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
EVEREST
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- . . <br /> <br />-- <br />.n <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />EVEREST DEVELOPMENT; LTD. <br /> <br />.\ ,\1[\\BfR OF TI IE t\'F.RE~T GROLP, IT[). <br /> <br />January 16, 1998 <br /> <br />Via Fax (490-2931) and <br />Regular Mail <br /> <br />Kim L. Lee, AICP <br />City Planner <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Centre Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113-1899 <br /> <br />Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application <br />2218-2240 Hamline Avenue <br />PF#2978 <br /> <br />Dear Ms. Lee: <br /> <br />The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we are withdrawing our application to <br />amend the Comprehensive Plan designation of the subject properties from medium <br />density residential to limited business and, accordingly, the application should be <br />removed from the January 26 City Council agenda. <br /> <br />V'Je are withdrawing our application because it is obvious that it is impossible to obtain <br />a fair hearing on the merits of our proposal in the face of substantial anti-Everest bias <br />exhibited by City staff and the current Council, exemplified by Council member <br />Goedeke at Wednesday night's Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />A brief review of our contacts with the City concerning the Hamline Avenue property <br />over the past several months demonstrates that staff and the City Council are intent on <br />discrediting and disadvantaging Everest, rather than providing a neutral forum for <br />judging a redevelopment opportunity on its merits. In the course of informal meetings <br />and conversations with City Manager Steve Sarkozy in October of this past year, Mr. <br />Sarkozy gave contradictory indications of how an office redevelopment proposal might <br />be initiated with the City. First Mr. Sarkozy stated an office redevelopment concept <br />could be considered within the context of the City's annual Comprehensive Plan <br />updating process which was to occur in the fall of 1997; later he stated there was no <br />such Comprehensive Plan updating planned for the remainder of 1997 nor any <br />identifiable time period going into the future. <br /> <br />2r,f)3 Long Uke RO,ld <br />SUite un - Ro,(:\illr:. ,\\"-. .'i31 U <br />(} 1.2 11) ~ --:;;(}I~ r.1'_' r}12. () ~b-OLS)~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.