Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. The sanitary sewer service for the existing house will need to be rerouted to County <br />Road B West, since there is not adequate width for a sanitary sewer easement <br />across the south lot as proposed. A County permit will be required to work within <br />the right-of-way of County Road B West. In addition, the relocation of the service <br />line would need to be accomplished prior to the lot split being finalized by the City. <br /> <br />4. It is the policy of the City to require the dedication of additional right-of-way in <br />conjunction with subdivisions of property if required. The Engineering Department <br />has indicated that an additional ten feet of right-of-way will need to be dedicated for <br />County Road B in accordance with the Ramsey County master street plan, and an <br />additional 15 feet will need to be dedicated for Burke Avenue in accordance with <br />City street requirements. These dedications would further reduce the size of the <br />two parcels as proposed. <br /> <br />5. A request to divide the lot into two parcels was denied in 1975; however, the official <br />record does not indicate why the request was denied. <br /> <br />6. The proposed variance from the lot area and width requirements is not in harmony <br />with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 <br />of the City Code (Zoning). Variances from both the minimum lot width and the <br />minimum lot area would be needed, and the resulting lot would not be compatible <br />with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />7. The proposed variance from the lot area and width requirements, if granted, will <br />adversely affect the public health. safety, or general welfare. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City <br />of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"). Ramsey County, Minnesota, that a variance to reduce <br />the lot area of one parcel to 8,911 square feet, and the lot width of both parcels to 79.56 <br />feet for the purpose of subdividing a parcel of record into two parcels at 964 County Road <br />B West be denied. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />; and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />Resolution _ ~ Page 2 of 3 <br />