Laserfiche WebLink
<br />did recommend alternative 2 and recommended that the Council consider <br />establishing a Citizen Task Force to make recommendations on transitions <br />and redevelopment in the remainder of the neighborhood. This is a project <br />in which the City must weigh the merits of preserving the status quo or <br />adapting to future needs. <br /> <br />1.3 The City Council must take action on the Comprehensive Plan amendment. If the <br />City Council approves a comprehensive plan amendment, the amendment is <br />subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval. <br /> <br />1 .4 The City Council will also take action on the concept plan for the planned unit <br />development for Charles Cabinet. If the concept is approved, the Council will take <br />additional action in the future regarding the final plan and the planned unit <br />development agreement. The change in the zoning map designation of the <br />parcel(s) from R-1 to PUD-B must also be published. The effective date of any <br />change is after receipt of the Metropolitan Council review of the comprehensive plan <br />amendment and legal publication of the zoning change. <br /> <br />2.0 BACKGROUND (Land Use) <br /> <br />2.1 Charles Cabinet Company, Inc. has been operated as a business on the parcel at <br />3090 Cleveland Avenue since 1955. When the property was zoned R-1 in 1959, <br />the existing business became a non-conforming use. The Schreiers have owned <br />the two homes on the parcel north of the Charles Cabinet for approximately 20 <br />years. In 1991, they purchased the Charles Cabinet business and parcel from Mr. <br />Schreier's father. Since 1991 sales have doubled and the number of employees has <br />increased. In order to function effectively and continue to grow in this location, <br />additional building space is required. <br /> <br />2.2 The current uses (a house and a business) create a unique problem for the <br />Schreiers. Because the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation both state the <br />site and the lots from County Road D to Brenner should be used for low density <br />residential uses, the pre-existing non-conforming cabinet shop cannot be expanded <br />and could not be easily converted to a residential use. Significant change has <br />occurred since the 1950s: Cleveland Avenue traffic has steadily increased and the <br />land west of Cleveland has been converted from a mix of residential and industrial <br />uses into a contemporary high value business park. Hence, property abutting the <br />east edge of Cleveland Avenue from County Road D to Brenner has become less <br />desirable as single family property. Selling the house and business for residential <br />uses would not recoup the replacement costs for another site according to the <br />applicant. Therefore, the applicant proposes to remain on the site by changing the <br />Comprehensive Plan for one parcel and creating a PUD redevelopment zone on <br />that site. The redevelopment project would serve many purposes in addition to <br />expanding the Cabinet Shop, It would serve as the first PUD "buffer" between a <br />business park and a residential area. It would also serve as the first parcel (of 6 to <br /> <br />PF#2986 - (10/26/98) - Page 2 of 10 <br />