|
<br />~.,.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />September' c28,' 1.998
<br />
<br />:-,
<br />
<br />, '
<br />To: Roseville City Planner,
<br />2660 'Civic Center Dri've ' ',-
<br />'Rosevil1e, Mn., 55113,' ,
<br />
<br />~. .
<br />
<br />,
<br />~
<br />
<br />, -
<br />From: J Ray. Schreurs
<br />~058 N . Wilder ,
<br />,Roseville, 'Mn. 55113-1215
<br />, ..' ; :~:I i ~-'f~:'.~.~ -, ~~ t' " _ j~ .. _ ~.: ..-. ~r
<br />
<br />,"
<br />
<br />.'.4...... J
<br />~ ~ ~:
<br />
<br />, "
<br />. '- .~, .;,-_.,-.1o;....,.i ~.. ,..-,-!.... ,;., -4- ~... ~~ ...;;;., :~ '_ ..,"_1;""".,.. i '" ""': i:I
<br />Re: . Planning ~ile'" q~986,~~ jI,i'.. ' ~Charles:: Cabfnet C~. '
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />T.:"'~'" :1I.,~< /:f:1~~4.. ' ~''t. ."~ ~~'.~' ~>'.. ".' \_ . :'. \ ,
<br />There was a Ch'arIes 'Cabinet Shop 'at. 3090 C~evehind: prior to the
<br />Ros,eville Comprehe~sive P~an.James Schreier, ,the sori of the
<br />former owner?nly wishes ,to enlarge ',the facility. This firm is a.
<br />good Qeighbor and adjoining property owne!s have no objection ,to the
<br />requested minor chang~s. '
<br />
<br />~,.'
<br />
<br />Wpy does the 'Pla~ning Commission propose to include also the two
<br />h9mes in lot 4 north of the cabinet, s~op? An even, worse proposal by
<br />the Planning ,c Co~mission. is to change all, the low density' residential'
<br />lots on the block to business.
<br />
<br />What -is the impetus to change Roseville from it community of
<br />principally lo\y, (iensity,.residenti'al to business with the '
<br />accompanying increase in . traffic cand noise? It will n'ot
<br />significantly. ,reduce residential taxes. Roseville has so much .
<br />business taxes now that we' must sh'are them with' less "developed"
<br />communities, per State law. In'short, we bear the burden of eXcess,
<br />business but 'must share the taxes with residential communities
<br />that are spared' the noise, .increased .need ,for policing, traffic,. etc.~
<br />
<br />\ .
<br />
<br />The i~k is hardly dry on the Ceritre Paiute .,bail out .with more T~
<br />funds. The buiLdings are going _ up, 'traffic is heavy on Cleveland and
<br />will get eveQ wOTcse, when all ~hebuild.ings are ~l1ed: .,why add .more" ,
<br />business on' the east' side of Clevehind? '..'
<br />
<br />. ~.-'
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />
<br />
<br />~7Sv~~.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />... . -.,.. ..:.
<br />"
<br />. .
<br />
|