Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. The proposed variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, <br />safety, or general welfare. The excessive area of garage will not have a <br />visual impact on the adjacent property owners. The excessive area of garage <br />will have a visual impact on the adjacent property owners, and the excessive <br />area will increase the impervious surface coverage and may create problems <br />with drainage and erosion on adjacent properties. These issues can be <br />addressed with the exterior finish of the building and grading of the site. <br /> <br />3. The presence of a duplex on the property does create a practical difficulty for <br />the applicant in providing adequate garage space with this area limitation. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDA TION <br /> <br />4.1 Based on the findings outline in Section 3.1, staff recommended denial of the <br />request for a variance to allow the construction of a second accessory building and <br />a variance to increase the lot coverage to 76.5% of the required rear yard for the <br />purpose of constructing a 28' x 36' detached garage at 2042-2044 Dale Street <br />North. <br /> <br />4.2 As an alternative, staff recommended approval of a variance to increase the lot <br />coverage to 44% of the required rear yard to allow the construction of a 12' x 22' <br />(264 square feet) addition to the east side of the existing accessory building. This <br />would increase the size of the garage to 46' x 22' (1012 square feet) and would <br />provide two garage stalls per dwelling unit. The applicant could also place a garden <br />shed (up to 120 square feet) on the property for storage of yard equipment. <br /> <br />5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />5.1 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on Wednesday, <br />July, 1998. Mike Heffernan was present to answer questions and provide additional <br />information. Two letters were received from neighboring residents expressing <br />concerns regarding the proposal. No residents commented on this request. The <br />Planning Commission discussed the way allowable accessory building size is <br />calculated, the presence of a hardship in this situation, erosion and grading <br />concerns, the need for additional storage space since the property is occupied by <br />a duplex, and the inability to construct an attached garage on this property. The <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for a variance to allow <br />the construction of a second accessory building and a variance to increase the lot <br />coverage to 76.5% of the required rear yard for the purpose of constructing a 28' x <br />36' detached garage at 2042-2044 Dale Street North, based on the modified <br />findings outlined in Section 3.1 of this report (4-3). <br /> <br />RCA (PF 3021) - 07/27/98 - Page 3 of 4 <br />