Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1t Metropolitan COllncil <br /> <br />---- ----...-.'-,..-.-..----~---.....--_.---.-..-_. -. - <br />Working jor (he Region, Planning for (he Fuwre <br /> <br />---.-..--- <br /> <br />- -~-~ <br /> <br />~'13y 30. 199i <br /> <br />~" <br />"\l..<--f ~ \ ~ 1, <br />19..~ <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch. Community Dc\"elopmelH Director <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Circle Drive <br />Roseville. MN 55113 <br /> <br />RE: EA W Review.. Roseville n Twin Lakes Dcveiopmem <br />Metropolitan Council District II <br />Referral File No, -- 16513-1 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Welsch: <br /> <br />Council staff has conducted a re\"icw of Ihis environmental asseSSmenl \\orkshect ([..\ \\") 10 ~k[...nl1i(l~' <br />its adequacy and accuracy in addre$~ing rCJ:'ior'al ',:OrlCt:r!1$" The staff re\"ie\\" has concluded that lll~' <br />EA \V is complete and accurate \~ith resp~c: tn regi"n,,: C0i\,~ernS and raises n0 major issllcs ~)t' <br />consistency \vith Counc i I pol ic ies. An !~j S i~ ::ot :~~ceSs:1ry ror regiL1na I purposes. f-Im\ ('\'er. :'1:1 tY <br />provides the following comments for your eO'1sider:Hion: <br /> <br />6. DCJcription <br /> <br />The EA W indicates that a parkway will be constructed through the site. Grading of Ihe site will be <br />necessary to redevelop the area and may impacI MCES structures, For this reason, the city should <br />submit its grading plans to the Council's i\,jCES offices for review and approval before the start orany <br />construction activity in the vicinity of the interceptor. <br /> <br />8. Permits and Approval Required <br /> <br />[tern 6. on page 3 discusses a p!an amendment entitled. Tile Twin Lakes CompreJII!tIsil'!! Plan <br />Amendme/1t, which the city anticipates \\iil1 be approv.;:d by June 1997. This plan amendment should bl.: <br />included in this section, The Council does not have record of this plan amendment. Irthe cilY is sed,in!, <br />Council approval by June 1997. it should submit the [<.mcfldment in the near future. Rosevil1e should ;1:~11 <br />include all penn its and approvals associ~Hed with the proposed hazardous site cleanup in this secti')n, <br /> <br />9. Land U.W - Potential Environmental Contamination <br /> <br />The EA W does n~t adequately address soil contamination and leaking storage tank issues that ;Irc <br />associated with the proposed development, II describes in great detail other projects and remediation <br />work plans that have been done for other redeveloped parcels. but each site is unique. This itcm ';hOl1ld <br />be revised to include the information requested as;: prt ()rthe EA \V for the Twin Lakes 13l1sin<"s Parf.-.. <br />A map showing the location of leaking storage t<1nk~ <I.; \\cli as an Envirollmental Site Assessment (ES.\ f <br />for the parcels to be redeveloped should be c\)ndtlc:.::d <br /> <br />----- <br /> <br />.....----+-----. --------- - - - <br /> <br />-.- -.- - <br />