Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- . T d}il1(j" <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />B R \\' I:'\'C. <br /> <br />1'1,1nnl";'; <br /> <br />Tr.1 n~pl ~rt.1ti("11 <br />E O>?;lnet.."r Hi ~ <br />Crt-.m D~>lgn <br /> <br />Thr6her 5<1uMe <br />700 Third Street 5". <br />\\inn~"f'"lis. <br />\!\: 33413 <br /> <br />~ 1 ~.: _~70-0700 <br /> <br />F." <:> I 2137o-lJ7!! <br /> <br />Dt"nn~I <br /> <br />\1ih".,uk~ <br /> <br />\;1il1n~~1pohs <br />\"~\\".ul... <br /> <br />Orld"do <br /> <br />PhnL"nix <br /> <br />r."tl.1l'ld <br /> <br />:..'" Diego <br />~'<11t!~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />_.._~ _~_--""""",,,"'-'~~""-'''-'I'''''Id-'''':\;'' <br /> <br />June 10. 1997 <br /> <br />Mr. Dennis Welsch <br />Community Development Director <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br /> <br />RE: Twin Lakes Budget Request <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Welsch: <br /> <br />The purpose of this letter is to document a request for additional funds to compk:[e [he <br />scope of work as presented in Supp len~ental Agreement Number ?7. <br /> <br />Attachment A details the project billings through May 30. 1997. The spreadsheet <br />indicates a remaining budget of $1.209.33 for the EA \\' task item. At the initiation of [11<..' <br />Twin Lakes project it was estimated that approximately S3.000 to $3,500 would b<..' <br />needed to finish the EA W work scope after completing the 30-day comment period. Tllis <br />amount was designed to cover costs associated with the findings document. project <br />management and expenses. The cost overrun at this point is primarily associated with the <br />traffic task, which has required an even greater than originally anticipated level of cffo[1 <br />because of some unique project and project area issues. <br /> <br />The comments received on the EA W have been reviewed to determine the level of effort <br />required to complete the remaining work tasks. Attachment B indicates an estimate of <br />$3,495 to complete the project work scope which is approximately $2,300 more than [he <br />existing project budget. <br /> <br />One approach that could be considered to address this issue is to use the existing <br />Supplemental Agreement Number 28 budget that was originally established to conduct <br />traffic work associated with the Centre Pointe project. The attached spreadsheet indicates <br />that $2,649.37 remains in that task budget. <br /> <br />I look forward to meeting with you to discuss this matter further. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />Chris Hiniker <br /> <br />cc: Jon Horn, BR W <br />File #35406-004-3201 <br />