My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03026
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:30:08 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:46:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3026
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
184 SKILLMAN AVE W
Applicant
NEEDHAM, MARY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />182 W. Skillman Ave. <br />St. Paul, MN 55113 <br />May 11, 1998 <br /> <br />Minor Variance Committee <br />City of Roseville <br />1660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />Dear Committee Members: <br /> <br />We would like you to grant us a minor variance to extend our west driveway south to <br />give ~ntrance to a garage we would like to build. The driveway, and the garage, will <br />be less than five feet from our western neighbor's property line. There is no other <br />practical way to access the garage. You did grant such a variance in 1990 for the <br />driveway for off-street parking. <br /> <br />The garage will probably encroach three feet or less onto the property line for <br />several reasons: <br /> <br />1. Because the driveway along the side of the house cannot be moved, we need to <br />position the garage so that we can have a straight shot to or from the garage. <br />Positioning the garage further east (away from the property line) would cause a <br />curve that would make backing out of the garage very difficult because of the <br />position of the house (see picture #4 and 5). <br /> <br />2. We do not want to position the garage further back (south) for several reasons. <br />A. We do not want to have to cut down the mature sugar maple (see picture #2). <br />B. In the winter especially, we do not want our renter to walk any further than <br />necessary to the house. <br />C. A longer driveway is more expensive to build and maintain, <br />D. and finany ,a garage set further back would destroy the aesthetic value of the <br />combined opened yards of the area (see picture #3). <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />YJ, ~: <br />:'A4 ~ ~ <br /> <br />Mary L. Needham <br />Diana M. Moss <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.