Laserfiche WebLink
<br />variances because they are newer cities with larger or wider lots that accommodate <br />the current housing sizes. <br /> <br />While this alternative may resolve the issue of consistency and maintaining the <br />status quo, it does impact property owners interest and opportunity to reinvest in <br />their properties. <br /> <br />3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />3.1 Staff recommends modifying the Code to use an administrative "setback permit" <br />process that reduces time and hearing costs, while adding flexibility needed to <br />respond to Roseville's livable community goals. <br /> <br />4.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: <br /> <br />By motion, recommend approval, based on staff findings and recommendations <br />dated September 9. 1998, of the Ordinance amending Section 1 013.02C of the City <br />Code. <br /> <br />Prepared by: Dennis Welsch and Kim Lee, AICP (490-2236) <br />Q:\Planning Files\3047 _Minor Variances\RPCA(090998).doc <br /> <br />PF3047 - RPCA (09/09/98) - Page 2 of 2 <br />