Laserfiche WebLink
<br />specified in the detail of the Planned Unit Development agreement and refined prior to <br />Council decisions on the concept. In addition, the issues relating to the grading, utilities and <br />fire protection services can be resolved as part of the PUD Agreement and Development Plan <br />review. An additional neighborhood meeting may be of assistance. If the Commission <br />accepts this recommendation, a project review time extension will be necessary. <br /> <br />5.0 Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> <br />On January 13, 1999, the Planning Commission held a discussion of the issues (see attached <br />excerpt from the draft minutes). The Planning Commission then recommended approval of <br />the proposal (4-2), citing the comments and findings in Section 3 and the recommendation <br />in Section 4 of this report. <br /> <br />5.1 The Commission recommended (4-2) approval of the request for an amendment to the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation of both parcels to High <br />Density Residential and approval of the concept development plan for a mixed use planned <br />unit development including the existing Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, a 56-unit three- <br />story senior housing building, and an off-street parking area, based on the findings outlined <br />in Section 3, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. Prior to requesting concept approval from the City Council, the applicant will hold <br />a design meeting with neighbors and interested public (including the Planning <br />Commission members if interested) to identify specific changes in site design and <br />landscaping, materials, massing, and visual screening from the Lake. <br />b. The applicant will include building design materials (brick, masonry, and natural <br />materials) that match those of the existing Church building. <br />c. The applicant will redesign the building mass to be consistent with the height, width, <br />and size of the existing Church building. <br />d. The applicant will request, in writing, the Council on January 25, 1999, accept a 60 <br />day time extension to the project review process for further design refinement. <br /> <br />If the Council approves the concept PUD and the change in the Comprehensive Plan, the <br />PUD does not take effect until after final approvals of the PUD and Subdivision and <br />respective agreements; and review and approval of the Comprehensive Plan change by the <br />Metropolitan Council; and publication of the PUD ordinance. <br /> <br />6.0 SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />The developer has asked, attached in writing, for an additional 60 day extension before submitting <br />the concept and design documents to the Council for a decision. This will change the dates stated <br />in the public hearing notice for this request. If approved, an amended notice would be prepared by <br />staff. <br /> <br />By resolution, approve a 60 day extension from this date (January 25, 1999) to March 27, 1999, <br />superceding the previous extension to March 9, 1999. A draft resolution is attached. <br /> <br />PF3049 - RCA (01/25/99) - Page 8 of9 <br />