Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />" <br />I' <br />i <br /> <br />'I <br />I' <br />Ij <br />I: <br />I: <br />1,\ <br />II <br /> <br />1,1' , <br />I. ' <br />I; <br />, <br />!, <br />i <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />[I <br />III <br />!I, <br />,::1 <br /> <br />they also the best market for organic pro- <br />duce and low-fat food? "We humans are <br />inconsistent in our risk assessment;' says <br />Nellie Brown, western regional director of <br />the Chemical Hazard Information Program <br />at Cornell University. "If you look at how <br />people do risk assessment for themselves, <br />you see a lot of rationalization. They see an <br />outcome as the one they want, so they will <br />buy something and rationalize why they do <br />it. But if they don't want to change, they'll <br />say they don't know what the risk is or what <br />the alternatives are:' <br />A lack of alternatives seems to be the <br />main reason why Americans pay dry clean- <br />ers almost $7 billion a year to douse their <br />clothes with a suspicious chemical. <br />"Consumers may be aware of the potential <br />risk, but they discount it because they need <br />somebody to take care of their garments;' <br />says Mary Scaleo, vice president of the <br />International Fabricare Institute, a trade <br />group for dry cleaners and launderers. "We <br />don't believe it has affected them." <br />In a 1996 survey of 30 suburban dry- <br />cleaning stores in Pittsburgh, only a handful <br />of customers expressed even a vague aware- <br />ness of the health and environmental con- <br />cerns surrounding dry cleaning. Dan <br />Kovacks, who conducted the survey while a <br />graduate student at Carnegie-Mellon <br />University, also asked customers what they <br />would do if they learned that dry cleaning <br />posed a threat to their well-being. Unable to <br />suggest alternatives, most said they would <br />simply dry clean less frequently. <br /> <br />':r@~olt~~s l:Q~~i~P~IJ~?g?i',ciy~~!f,9i~.Hl,~tRf;: <br /> <br />In congested places like New York City, <br />health concerns are greater because dry <br />cleaners and apartment dwellers some- <br />times occupy the same buildings. But <br />awareness doesn't necessarily change <br />behavior. Long Island-based Ecomat is a <br />franchiser of stores that offer a perc-free <br />alternative to dry cleaning. Its research <br />shows widespread consumer concern. But <br />a strong environmental and health advan- <br />tage isn't enough to make someone change <br />to a new dry cleaner. <br />Ecomat's survey of 1,200 dry-cleaning cus- <br />tomers in New Jersey found that 69 percent of <br />men and 78 percent of women are concerned <br />about dry-cleaning products' impact on the <br />environment. Also, 54 percent of men and 63 <br />percent of women say they are concerned <br />about the effects of these products on their <br />health. But "just because they say they're con- <br />cerned doesn't mean they're doing anything <br />about it;' says Ecomat vice president Keith <br />Emerson. "People still choose their dry clean- <br />ers based on convenience:' <br />In the daily whirl of errands and appoint- <br />ments' the average American's concern <br />about long-term health risks often gets <br />shoved aside. A Harvard Business School <br />survey found that the most important rea- <br />sons for choosing a cleaner are: convenient <br />location, hours, and parking; speed of ser- <br />vice; doing a good job; and price. <br /> <br />EMERGING ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />People who work at dry-cleaning shops <br /> <br />face a much higher risk from perc than <br /> <br />their customers do, and many owners <br />might stop using perc for their own health <br />if they could find a reasonable alternative. <br />Marketing strategy could give them anoth- <br />er reason. In the intensely competitive <br />world of neighborhood retailing, anything <br />that could give a store a competitive edge is <br />worth a try. <br />Public awareness of dry cleaning's health <br />risks has increased as alternatives to perc <br />have multiplied, says Sylvia Ewing-Hoover <br />of the Center for Neighborhood <br />Technology (CNT), a Chicago nonprofit <br />organization that tries to develop solutions <br />to environmental problems. Perc is still the <br />standard, however. When the CNT opened <br />a "Greener Cleaner" store in 1995, its main <br />goal was to demonstrate that the more envi- <br />ronmentally friendly "wet cleaning" <br />approach could clean fine fabrics just as <br />well as traditional dry cleaning could. "Wet <br />cleaning;' which has been around for over <br />50 years, uses soap, water, and a custom <br />treatment plan for each garment. A 1993 <br />EPA analysis found that wet cleaning is as <br />effective as dry cleaning, and that the cost is <br />competitive. <br />"When consumer awareness grows, very <br />often there's some good and bad to that;' <br />says Ewing-Hoover. "It's too easy for the <br />mainstream media to use scare tactics when <br />they talk about dry cleaning. We don't want <br />to see communities lose jobs, and we don't <br />want people ending up wearing Ken and <br />Barbie clothes. When we opened the <br />Greener Cleaner, we answered consumer <br /> <br /> <br />Full Service, <br />Custom Designed Research <br />Qualitative & Quantitative <br /> <br />gateway@hamcr.com <br />www.hamcr.com <br /> <br />Spanish, Portuguese & <br />Most Asian Languages <br /> <br />Phone: 650.595.5028 <br />Fax: 650.595.5407 <br /> <br />1301 Shoreway Road, Suite 100 · Belmont, CA 94002 USA <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />American Demographics May 1998 <br />