|
<br />
<br />ROSEVILlE HOUSING AND POPULATION ALTERNATIVES
<br />
<br />1990
<br />
<br />1999
<br />
<br />2000
<br />
<br />2005
<br />
<br />1991
<br />
<br /> H$hld Hs(]liI1lt! Pop HsI1Id HSQuml.5 Pop H$hkI Hsguntts Pop H!hld Hsg units Pop HsI1Id _ units Pop
<br />Developing Suburb!5 Reach Capacity Limits
<br />Rose\lille Current B? 13,562 14,216 33,485 14,355 14,962 34,194 14,500 14,935 34,539 14,800 15,038 35,000 15,050 15,502 35,150
<br /> past trends 14,20D 14,626 34,041 14,500 14,935 34,446
<br /> rO'Wlh -opt 14,700 15,'4' 35,240 15,650 16,326 31,636
<br />
<br />Differences
<br />Rosevl!Ie
<br />
<br />Currenl BP
<br />past b"end9-
<br />growth opt
<br />
<br />464
<br />309
<br />1,185
<br />
<br />150
<br />405
<br />2,396
<br />
<br />193
<br />
<br />103
<br />
<br />461
<br />
<br />450
<br />300
<br />'.'50
<br />
<br />746
<br />
<br />709
<br />
<br />145
<br />
<br />.21
<br />
<br />345
<br />
<br />100
<br />
<br />2010
<br />
<br />2015
<br />
<br />2020
<br />
<br /> H>hld HSD und.$ Pop Hs.!'1ld Hs units. PO\> H>hld Hsg un!!s Pop
<br />Ros~!e Current BP 15,500 \5,965 36,500 15,6SO 16,120 36,750 15,600 16.274 31,000
<br /> past trends 14,800 15,244 ;34,852 15,000 1S,450 3S,223 15,200 15,656 35,595
<br /> rowttl opl. 11,000 17,510 40,032 1-5,200 18,746 42,731 19.400 19.982 45,430
<br />
<br />Djfft;m:!noCt:i$
<br />Rose\l~le
<br />
<br />Current B'P
<br />past trends
<br />grOYw1h opt
<br />
<br />450
<br />300
<br />1, \50
<br />
<br />464
<br />309
<br />1,185
<br />
<br />750
<br />405
<br />2,395
<br />
<br />150
<br />200
<br />1,200
<br />
<br />155
<br />206
<br />1,236
<br />
<br />250
<br />372
<br />2,699
<br />
<br />150
<br />200
<br />\,200
<br />
<br />155
<br />206
<br />1,236
<br />
<br />250
<br />372
<br />2,699
<br />
<br />The household fexec3St ranQG above is: 1) the- BI~.....I IDrf!ql5t, 2} U1., k;lwe,sl Qj 5eYerill Cwncil Pilst trend option!!- .nd 31th"" hiQhef of out' concerrlt81od or ~ cenleB OPOOn
<br /> 1oreca:R Because RoseviPu has
<br />plans that we very suppo1i\1e of the regional growth $tralagy we agreed tQ a highlllf number than.any of the Council growth optiORS fOfecasls as part 01 the roll-out process. AllMugl1
<br /> '\t'\e$., 1Qr~s't3 t;Oyer:EII
<br />a r8~Y wide range of p08Sibiljlie8/~ WI:! would encourage Ihe community to e:xploc8 oplions that be-sl ranee:' a reCL50l'1,f1blB r.angEt of posaI1blliti8s. The Consultant wants housing
<br /> un~s ra.ther than h~sehol~!S 10 be use
<br />Varying thlJ typf;'J mix by growth e.ssumption would make sense, TI'1e mix Is. up ~o lhe c~ty, lhe only constraint IS that ttlere carl be only 8 tote:lland USB typeiL oovenng boLh res~denlial
<br /> and commercJallndustflBI U!ll!l!l.
<br />
<br />~-+----ro..-~_
<br />
<br />- -_._~.-
<br />
<br />+-- - ~ ......" --.- ~
<br />
<br />
<br />~. - - ... .~
<br />
|