My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03065
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:31:50 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:48:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3065
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUESTFORCOUNC~AcnON <br /> <br />DATE: 07-27-98 <br />ITEM NO: K-3 <br /> <br />.Qepa~ment Approval: Manager Approved: Agenda Section: <br />~ Reports/Recommendations (Con' t. ) <br />Item Description: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL: Cost of Growth Study <br /> <br />1.0 Background <br /> <br />1.1 Approximately one year ago, the Metropolitan Council approved the <br />"Regional Growth Strategies" which is intended to be the blueprint for <br />metropolitan development into the next century. This regional strategy will <br />help define: 1} the way our metropolitan area accommodates some <br />600,000 new residents in the next 20 years; 2) the patterns of <br />redevelopment including transportation, housing, etc.; and, 3) the direction <br />of tax policy in response to development patterns and service delivery <br />costs. <br /> <br />1.2 The Regional Growth Strategies has many assumptions about the cost of <br />accommodating new development and redevelopment. In order to test <br />those assumptions, the Metropolitan Council is conducting the "Cost of <br />Growth StYdy" and has offered the City of Roseville an opportunity to <br />participate. This type of study is unique in the country, and one of the <br />most forward thinking approaches to understanding long-term costs of <br />service delivery on a city by city and metropolitan area wide basis. (Other <br />cities involved may include Richfield, Apple.valley, Cottage Grove, Coon <br />Rapids, Shakopee and the inner cities, a~fwell as two school districts). <br /> <br />1.3 The benefrts to Roseville would include a financial impact analysis of our <br />current seryi,ce delive~y-stem over a long period of time, allowing the <br />City to evaluate long-term costs and developing a system of financial <br />benchmarks. In addition, long-term service costs in Roseville and our <br />community's revenue projections will be evaluated based on the <br />anticipated regional growth model to assess our ability to sustain our <br />current strong financial position. <br /> <br />1.4 The cost to the City of Roseville is an amount not to exceed $10,000 plus <br />some staff time to support the effort. Financial support from the 35W <br />Corridor Coalition will reduce the cost by $5,000 (leaving the City with only <br />a $5,000 commitment) on the basis that the lessons learned in Roseville <br />are transferable to other cities in the 35W Corridor. The cost for this <br />should be committed from the 1998 Contingent Account. <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.