pf_03065 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5-27-1'~'~5 5. 2dAt,j FROt.1 , ~ - , . I Work ProdUCl: Memoranda as Appropriate. TASK 11 Discuss Possible Implementation Strategies There are over forty possible implementation techniques to managing growth, These C<:in take the form of incentives or disincentives. They C~ focus primanly on diroct financial components, land u:'.c elements or combination of these and other factors. TA and FLC will be working on this task. FLC has been actively involved in the preparation. evaluation, selection and implementation of various alternative development scenarios. As such they have ::x.per1ise on the nonufiscal impacts of growth. including but not limited to, secondary physical, environmental, housing, economic development and related impact. T A's CWTent work with the Middle Rio Grande Council of Governmems (MRGCOG) on evaluating the e.(;onomic sustainability issues for the region is one ex.ample of the firm'~ studies focusing on non~fiscal impact issues. \Ve will prepaIe a draft of the memorandum on possibl~ implementation strategies. After murually agreed changes a...'"e made we will issue a final memorandum, Work Product: Possible Implementation Strategies Memorandum. TASK 12 Presentations of Previous Reports After the completion of the fiscal impact report, prototype fiscal results, non-fiscal impacts of growth. and possible implementation strategies. we recom..'1iend rbat presentations be given to [he particIpating communities. liaison committee and Metro Council members. We have ass-umed these presentations will occur a maximum of three consecutive days. Work Product: Presentations and AppropriaTe Supporting ,Vlalerial. There may be.olher tasks that are mutually agreed upon., These may involve additional participation by the firms already noted. We are wining to work with ot.h~r firms who have discus~ed their spceialil.eu experience with U~. For example. Richardson. Rich1er and Associates. Inc. ha....e extensive cxperi~ncc with Metro Council regarding community outreach and facilttatiol1 III. PROPOSED PERIOD OF PERFO~1\lANCE BaSed on previous discussion with Metro Council staff and the required period of performa.o.ce, we have established what we think is a realistic time frame for performance. This assumes that .....:c will be able: . to begin, Task 3, Conduct .CO~l1unity Level of Service and' Co~t and Revenue Factor lntervicws, the first week in September, We a.ti.ticipate having two persons focusing on the ten communities/school districts. One would work on the two large communities and the two school districts and the other would work on (h~ remaining six communities. This will enable some consistency and interchange to be achieved and still meet a ((;asonable time period. The time char! 0/1 the next [W};f indicates lhe Slaging. This time period allows for adeqL'!lt.e review of products by the respectivc clients. 6 Tischler & Associates, Ir,c