Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.-") ,~r.t <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />City of Rosevi//e <br />Community Development Department <br /> <br />Memo <br />Sep 24,1998 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br />Ed Burrell, City Finance Director <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch, <br />Community Development Director (490-2232) <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Cost of Sprawl - Fiscal Impact Study <br /> <br />You will be attending a meeting on Friday rregarding the above study. Here <br />are the questions David and I asked on Wednesday in our meeting with Bill <br />Byers and Paul Tischler. David and I are working towards completing our <br />models in the next 2-3 weeks. We will need to share these with you before <br />going too far, especially the 2020 concentrated scenario. (I assume all this <br />planning becomes a public document.) <br /> <br />1. How do you account for non-development, Le. "blind neglece of <br />industrial or housing areas? <br /> <br />2. Has Fiscal Disparities and the inherent incentives been added to the <br />model, i.e. why should a city add concentration or commercial industrial <br />base if they are being paid to do nothing? <br /> <br />3. When calculating new growth, does the model take in to account the <br />need for new parks and roads (answer: some) and county and regional <br />roads, transit (answer: not sure)? <br /> <br />4. The floor area calculations are different for each community. How can <br />you use a regional coefficient for this and still have "case studies"? <br /> <br />5. How does the model account for a city's deferred maintenance of <br />infrastructure, or inversely, account for an aggressive, scheduled <br />infrastructure replacement program like Roseville's? - Especially, how do <br />the costs show up fairly? When concentrated growth scenario is used, <br /> <br />1 <br />