Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 9/15/2014 <br /> Item No.: 14.c <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Discussion regarding alterations to the use of the regulating plan in the <br />Community Mixed Use (CMU) District (Twin Lakes) <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />The current Twin Lakes area is largely governed by the CMU zoning district (with a small <br />2 <br />amount of high density residential). <br />3 <br />The CMU district is unique in the City’s zoning ordinance because it has a very broad set of <br />4 <br />permitted uses including residential, office, retail and even some quasi-industrial uses. This <br />5 <br />amount of land use flexibility, by itself, is generally not desirable in a traditional zoning <br />6 <br />ordinance because it can lead to a scattered land use pattern, intense uses adjacent to more <br />7 <br />sensitive uses, and development can be restricted because property owners do not have assurance <br />8 <br />that their development will be protected from future incompatible development on adjacent <br />9 <br />properties. <br />10 <br />In traditional zoning, cities address this concern of incompatible uses by creating a series of <br />11 <br />districts that have very limited uses (office, single family residential, retail, industrial, etc.) and <br />12 <br />then mapping those limited districts into areas that are viewed to be appropriate. This is the <br />13 <br />approach that occurs in the entire city that is not zoned CMU. <br />14 <br />This traditional, separated use zoning approach, has been falling out of favor in some areas <br />15 <br />because although it prevents a lot of very bad situations created by incompatible uses, it also can <br />16 <br />restrict the degree to which extraordinary development can occur by limiting creativity and <br />17 <br />placemaking. Traditional, separated use zoning can lead to development that is considered to be <br />18 <br />generic. <br />19 <br />Form based codes were created a few decades ago to address this issue and have led to an <br />20 <br />elevation of the concept of placemaking. Form based codes have led to a resurgence of creative <br />21 <br />development and many popular developments from the past two decades included some level of <br />22 <br />form based code regulation. <br />23 <br />The method that form based codes use to allow a wide range of land use and design flexibility <br />24 <br />without leading to the problem of scattered and incompatible land uses is that it introduces the <br />25 <br />concept of a regulating plan. The regulating plan is a schematic diagram that can be similar to a <br />26 <br />site plan and shows how the form based code standards will be applied. Regulating plans often <br />27 <br />show the general arrangement of items such as the following: <br />28 <br />29 <br />1. Blocks and street network <br />30 <br />2. Street functional types <br />31 <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />