My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03077
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:32:35 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3077
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
1944 LEXINGTON AVE N
Applicant
OLSON, JOHN
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 Member Klausing asked if moving the building three feet further (six feet total) <br />2 from the property line would be a hindrance to development. (Yes) Mr. Olson <br />3 suggested a retaining wall along the pond. <br />4 <br />5 Lawrence Mathe 1081 Harriet Lane, stated the building could act as a sound <br />6 barrier and wind block. <br />7 <br />8 Larie Koranda, 1956 Lexington, adjacent to the north side of the building noted <br />9 that there are delivery trucks at all hours. The lighting on the tower will affect her <br />10 bedrooms. The privacy fence should be extended to screen her yard. <br />11 <br />12 John Olson noted that proposed lighting will be less than spotlights on the <br />13 building walls. Bill Brisley noted the tower light will be diffused through a <br />14 calwall window. <br />15 <br />16 Wayne Griesel prepared a list of minimum requriements including landscaping, <br />17 finish on the east wall, no motorized vehicles on the Rose Villa Property; drainage <br />18 not to effect the landscape plan. He noted there has been no town home <br />19 association meeting. <br />20 <br />21 See the attached notes from Mr. Griesel. (Not in packet - KK) <br />22 <br />23 Tim Cook and sister Peggy, does not want to see a strip mall on the site. The site <br />24 is in a B-1 zone. A B-1 zone provides a buffer to neighborhoods. There are <br />25 safety, parking and traffic concerns. The space is not big enough. There is <br />26 disruption with the construction. <br />27 <br />28 Peggy Jones, 1088 Ryan, noted that her south view is "open", but will be a brick <br />29 building higher than the existing building. Long term what will the impact on her <br />30 property values be. Safety, privacy and security, as well as, noise and dust are <br />31 concerns. She requested a fence along the south edge. <br />32 <br />33 Judy Florine commented that property values and salability may change because <br />34 of the view of the wall. <br />35 <br />36 Acting Chair Rhody closed the hearing. <br />37 <br />38 Member Cunningham asked for details regarding the ponding area at the <br />39 northwest comers of the site. Is there possibility for a storm pipe to the west <br />40 (Lexington). Deb Bloom noted storm water on the roof must be diverted to the <br />41 west. <br />42 <br />43 Member Mulder noted there will be less water running east because of roof <br />44 drainage. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.