My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03082
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2009 4:13:27 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3082
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br /> <br />DATE: 11/22/99 <br />ITEM NO: J-3 <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br />HEARINGS <br />Resolution and Ordinance modifications regarding Metropolitan Council <br />Plan Review of RosevilJe Comprehensive Plan (PF3174) <br /> <br /> <br />1.0 BACKGROUND <br /> <br />1.1 On November 4, 1999 city staff met with the Metropolitan Council staff to determine <br />what other surface water and sanitary sewer issues might be necessary for the final <br />review and approval of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. What follows is a <br />summary of a request for Council approval in the form of a resolution [as previously <br />done in 1998) and an ordinance amendment. <br /> <br />1.2 Roseville's Comprehensive Plan has been submitted for Metropolitan Council review <br />and approval numerous times since its original adoption on September 12, 1994. <br />Each time the obstacle to approval has been Roseville's surface water management <br />plan, technical amendments to it, and how it is implemented, as well as more detail <br />on sanitary sewer flow, primarily between Roseville and adjoining communities. <br /> <br />1.3 Staff prepared new technical information that was requested, but noted that it was <br />impossible for the city to rewrite the surface water management plan until the three <br />watershed organizations (Rice Creek, Capital, and Grass Lake) complete their plans. <br />The staff requested an alternative approach in which the City agrees to adopt a <br />resolution stating that within 120 days of Metropolitan Council approval, the City <br />would adopt an ordinance amending the City Code, Section 1016.26 (Storm Water <br />Management). The amendment would state explicitly that the City will use National <br />Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />(MnPCA) Urban Best Management Practices, and the established standards of the <br />water management organization having jurisdiction over the specific project. <br /> <br />1.4 The amendment also states that the City would require all new residential <br />developments of more than five acres to meet storm water ponding and quality <br />standards. This applies to developments of more than 20 acres in the current code. <br />(The city currently has no undeveloped or redevelopment residential sites greater <br />than 10 acres.) <br /> <br />1.5 Finally, the new amendment would require property owners of new developments to <br />inspect storm water facilities for proper functioning one year after construction and <br />ensure they are working properly and see that they are cleaned/repaired on a five- <br />year interval. <br /> <br />1.6 The City Attorney has prepared the necessary ordinance amendment to Chapter 1016.26 <br />of the City Code (see attachment). <br /> <br />PF3174 - RCA (112299).doc Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.