Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCil ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 1/25/99 <br />ITEM NO: C-2 <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br />CONSENT <br /> <br />The City of Roseville is requesting vacation of a water main easement <br />located across Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway Business Park (PF3089). <br /> <br />1.0 Requested Action <br /> <br />pproval: <br /> <br /> <br />1.1 The City of Roseville is requesting vacation of a water main easement located across Lot <br />1, Block 2, Gateway Business Park (PF3089). The water main located within the easement <br />has been replaced along the outside boundaries of Block 2, Gateway Business Park and the <br />easement that is proposed to be vacated is no longer necessary. <br /> <br />2.0 Background <br /> <br />2.1 The City of Roseville is requesting the vacation of a 35' water main easement across the <br />northern portion of Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway Business Park. The water main located within <br />this easement has been replaced along the outside boundaries of Block 2, Gateway <br />Business Park. These replacement easements were accepted by the Council at the <br />December 16,1998 regular meeting. Therefore, the easement is no longer necessary. <br /> <br />2.2 Section 1013.04 outlines the procedure for vacating streets, alleys, and easements. <br /> <br />3.0 Staff Comment <br /> <br />3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> <br />The water main located within this easement was relocated in 1997; therefore, the <br />easement is no longer needed by the City. <br /> <br />4.0 Staff Recommendation <br /> <br />4.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 3.1 of this report, staff recommends approval of <br />the request for vacation of a 35' water main easement across Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway <br />Business Park. <br /> <br />5.0 Planning Commission Recommendations <br /> <br />On January 13, 1999, the Planning Commission held the required hearing and received <br />comment from the public. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />proposed vacation (7-0), citing the comments and findings in Section 3 and the <br />recommendation in Section 4 of this report <br /> <br />PF3089 - RCA (1/25/99) - Page 1 of 2 <br />