pf_03092 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

on the street along the north side of the building. 3.10. The project will have minimal traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. Estimates are that 4 trips per employee per day will generate between 80 and 100 total trips per day. Both County Road D ar:d Fairview Avenues have approximately 9,000 trips per day and will grow to nearly 12,000 by the year 2010. 3.11. The project as proposed is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive P:a.n and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). 3.12. The proposed project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. 4.0 S1I'AFF IRJECOMMIENlllA1fllON 4.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends approval of the cOlI!lcejpt development plan for a 4,000 to 5,000 s.f. office building planned unit development at the southeast corner of the intersection of County Road 0 and Fairview Avenue. 5.0 JPJLANNJING COMMllSSITON RECOMMIENDA 1I'1[ONS On January 13, 1999, The Planning Commission held the required hearing and received comment from the public. After discussion of the issues (see attached excerpt from the draft minutes) and comments primarily from adjoining property owners David and D<m Seaberg and Barbara Wood, 3092 Fairview, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal (7-0), citing the comments and findings in Section 3 and the recommendation in Section 4 of this report and noting the effective date of the PUD would not occur until after publication of the PUD ordinance. Chair Katie Harms requested the application to hold a second neighborhood meeting because only three neighbors attended the first meeting. 6.0 S1UGGES1fE~ AC1fITON 6.1 By motion, approve the ~O!In~~lPt development plan for a 4,000 to 5,000 s.f. office bui.lding planned unit development at the southeast comer of the intersection of County Road D and Fairview Avenue, ba.sed on the fmdings outlined in Section 3 of the report. It is unders:ood that the effective <;late of such a planned unit development will not occur until after the submission and approval of the vacation of the needed portion of County Road 0; and, after the submission a..)d final approval of the planned unit development agreement and publication of the PUD ordinance. No new construction may occur before the effective date of the ordinance. ~fJ;~}; " .' ( " ,,/ Attachments: Location map; Site Plans, Photos of Shoreview Project Engineering Report, E'Xcerpt from PC Draft minutes 1/13/99 Prepared by: Dennis Welsch, Commt1nity Development Director (490-2232) Q:\Planning Files\3092 _ CoxlRCA(O I ~ 599).doc Application Deadlines: Accepted Dec~mber 14, 1999; Concept Approval Decision Date: February 14, 1999; Final Approvals Date depend on complete submission date, Vacation is not subject to 60 day requirement. PF3092 - RCA (01/25/99) - Page 4 of 4 .---,-.-