Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MEMO <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />January 4, 1999 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch, Community Development <br /> <br />Debra Bloom, Engineerin_ <br /> <br />PUD Concept Development Plan For Cox Insurance Associates, Inc. <br />3116 Fairview Ave. North <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />We have had an opportunity to review the PUD concept development plan for the construction of an Insurance <br />Building at 3116 Fairview Ave. N. We would like to work with you on making this project the best proposal <br />possible and have the following engineering related comments. Since some of these comments could impact <br />the proposed site plan, it is difficult for engineering to make a positive recommendation for this proposed <br />rezoning until some of these issues are addressed. <br /> <br />Site Plan <br />1. The Ramsey County right- of- way guidelines require the dedication of an additional 10 feet of right- of- way <br />along Fairview Ave. This will impact the proposed site plan. It appears that the proposed design does take <br />this additional right- of- way into account. <br /> <br />Right- of- way <br />1. We have had discussions with the Arden Hills Public Works staff regarding the proposed right- of- way <br />vacation. Their primary concern is retaining enough right- of- way to maintain the existing in place <br />utilities and street configuration. <br />2. There is a sanitary sewer line south of the centerline of County Road D. This pipe is 12 feet deep. We must <br />retain 24 feet of right- of- way centered on this pipe to maintain OSHA trench requirements when work is <br />done on this pipe. The area shown as right- of- way to be vacated on your site plans would not retain the <br />necessary right- of- way for utility maintenance work. We are willing to work with the applicant on the <br />vacation of a portion of the County Road D right- of- way. However, it would be short sighted of the City to <br />vacate right- of- way that is needed for public and private utilities. <br />3. It appears that to meet the needs ofthe City as outlined above, it will be necessary to remove the northerly- <br />most portion of the building (the stairwell to the basement). To address the applicant's needs the City <br />would consider vacating the right- of- way to the northeasterly back corner of the existing building <br />(Approximately 7 feet of right- of- way). This would address the issue of an existing building on right- of- <br />way, as well as retaining enough right- of- way for City purposes. <br />4. The utilities and street alignment/ width should be shown on future plans for the site, to better illustrate <br />the impacts to the surrounding road system. Existing utilities should be shown on the plans as well to <br />ensure that we are not vacating right- of- way that is in use. The restoration of the street to green space and <br />installation of curb and gutter would be the applicant's responsibility. <br />5. As with all right- of- way vacations there will be an issue of ownership once the City relinquishes its interest <br />in the right- of- way. <br /> <br />Grading Plan <br />1. It appears from existing City contour maps that this site drains overland to the southeast There is an <br />existing low area on the site where water is retained prior to sheet draining over the neighboring properties <br />and ultimately out to Wheeler St N. storm sewer. Additional information on the grades for this site should <br />be provided to ensure that increased impervious will not increase the amount of runoff to the surrounding <br />properties. <br />2. Please provide information on the proposed storm sewer. This should include location, size, and type of <br />pipe as well as proposed inverts and connection to the City system. It appears from the architect's plan <br /> <br />6\1f\ <br />\j'^-< <br />