Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> * * * * * * * * * * * <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br /> County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 8th day of September, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following members were present: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, and Roe, and the following <br /> were absent: None. <br /> Member McGehee introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 11176 <br /> RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO <br /> ADJUST THE APPROVED TAX LEVY FOR 2015 BONDED DEBT <br /> WHEREAS, the City will be required to make debt service payments on General Obligation Debt in <br /> 2014; and <br /> WHEREAS, there are reserve funds sufficient to partially reduce the originally scheduled levy for <br /> General Obligation Series 2009A, 2011A, 2012A, and 2013A; and <br /> WHEREAS, General Obligation Series 2008A requires a slightly higher amount; and <br /> WHEREAS, General Obligation Series 2004 Refunding will require continued levy support to repay <br /> the internal loan used to retire the bonds early. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, <br /> that <br /> The Ramsey County Auditor is directed to change the 2015 tax levy for General Improvement Debt by <br /> $139,900.95 from that which was originally scheduled upon the issuance of the bonds as follows: <br /> Originally Additions <br /> Scheduled or Certified <br /> Bond Issue Levy Amount Reductions Debt Levy <br /> GO Refunding 2004 ** $ - $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 <br /> GO Equip Certs 2008A 354,658.50 341.50 355,000.00 <br /> GO Housing Imp 2009A 118,151.25 (118,151.25) - <br /> GO 2011A 836,618.70 (1,618.70) 835,000.00 <br /> GO 2012A 1,424,272.50 (49,272.50) 1,375,000.00 <br /> GO 2013Arefunding 886,200.00 (121,200.00) 765,000.00 <br /> Total $3,619,900.95 $ (139,900.95) $3,480,000.00 <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Etten and upon <br /> a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, <br /> Roe; and the following voted against the same: None. <br />