pf_03097 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

(' 11 w Extract Of Minutes Of Meeting Of The City Council Of The City Of Roseville * * * * * * * * * * * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on Monday, the 22nd day of February, 1999, at 6:30 P.M. The following members were present: Wiski, Maschka, Wall, Mastel and the following were absent: Goedeke Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 9634 DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SECOND FREE STANDING MONUMENT CHURCH SIGN AT 910 COUNTY ROAD D (PF3097) (Lutheran Church ofthe Resurrection) WHEREAS, Section 1009.04(B) of the Roseville City Code allows one sign not greater than fifty (50) square feet in gross surface area for a church in a residential zone; and WHEREAS, Lutheran Church ofthe Resurrection, 910 County Road 0, has requested a variance to allow a second non-illuminated monument ground sign for the Church on the northwest portion of their property located at 910 County Road 0, said property being legally described as follows: The south 95 feet of the north 367 feet of Lot 1, Saint Paul Park, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The north 272 feet of Lot land the north 272 feet of Lot 2, except the west 128 feet thereof, Saint Paul Park, Ramsey county, Minnesota; subject to road easements on County Road D and Victoria Street; Lot 1, Block 6, Anderson-Erickson Addition No.2, Ramsey County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on Wednesday, February 10,1999, and recommended denial ofthe requested variance; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation on Monday, February 22, 1999; and. WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: 1. Minnesota Statutes 462.357 provides for variance requirements which the City has adopted in City Code Section 1013.02. The applicant is required to provide the burden of proof that a variance from the existing code is necessary. The applicant must demonstrate a unique physical hardship on the site; that no practical ~,0.~ 'J' 6"