Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Qf~lo1 <br /> <br />ordinance should be declared null and void because it is arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory and <br /> <br />unreasonable and was adopted in bad faith. <br /> <br />L. <br /> <br />Under the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Mhm. Stat. ~ 471.705, et seq., it is presumed <br /> <br />that all City Council meetings and executive sessions must be open to the public. Moreover, <br /> <br />serial gatherings of less than a quorum constitute a violation of the statute when the intent is to <br /> <br />scretion but to recommend approval of the application to vacate and rededicate the utility <br /> <br />" ~ - easements. Subsequently, Councilmember Barb Mastel confinned that property owners of the <br /> <br /> <br />/' HM Mall had certain rights under the law and that the City bad no discretion but to approve the <br /> <br />, <br />.)1/ Cub Project. Referring to the upcoming City Council meeting of March 22, 1999, Barb Mastel <br /> <br /> <br />~ 't.. stated that "My guess is that we'll stick to the issue as presented, namely, moving the easements. <br /> <br /> <br />I don't think we can put conditions on a request like this because they aren't asking for a <br /> <br /> <br />The City Council met serially with the City Attorney in groups of two to discuss, decide <br /> <br />and receive infonnation to develop and orchestrate a way to stop the Cub Project. During the <br /> <br />unlawful meetings~ the councilmembers and City Attorney conspired to deliberately and <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />r/ <br /> <br />-~ <br /> <br />.--..... - --'- <br /> <br />- <br />