HomeMy WebLinkAboutpf_03119
'"
~f~"'\
~tI=~
. ., '\ V \00
~~~
~\~~ cd.\.
.~
~
ELLERBE BECKET
~
August 29,2000
Lee F. Anderson,
A.IA
Project Planner
Mr. Steve Sarkozy, City Manager
City ofRoseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113-1899
Re:
Proposal for Professional Services
Roseville City Center
Programming Services
Commi~sion No.: 7491.9820.01
800 LaSalle
Avenue
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
Telephone:
612.376.2080
Facsimile:
612.376.2505
E-mail:
Lee _ Anderson@
EllerbeBecket,com
Dear Mr. Sarkozy:
We are pleased to submit for your consideration the following Proposal for Professional
Services for programming the new building elements of the Roseville City Center. When
authorized by signature on the last page of this letter, Ellerbe Becket, Inc. (Architect) will
provide the required Professional Services to the City of Roseville, Minnesota (Owner) for
the following Project:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Basic Services of the Architect are defined as follows:
Work with the City Manager and City Department Heads (the Project Advisory Group) to
prepare conceptual facility programs for each of the following proposed building elements
for the new Roseville City Center (refer to the 11/10/99 draft Roseville City Center Master
Plan and Development Strategy document prepared by Ellerbe Becket):
County Road C / Lexington:
. City Hall renovation and expansion - including new council chambers, entry
lobby and winter garden.
. Public Safety Building (police and fire station), including replacement
accommodations for the existing on-site fire station.
. Community Center.
00
fJ\.
'lr'
~'
----
Mr. Steve Sarkozy, City Manager
August 29, 2000
Page 2
~
East Side Central Park:
. New Recreation Center, including indoor pool and community facilities.
These conceptual facility programs will incorporate the following project information to
support continued development and planning for the Roseville City Center project:
. Project mission statement / intent
. Operational program description
. Space requirements listing
. Key programmatic requirements listing
. Relationships between major building sub-units and with other City Center
building / site elements.
. Site requirements - access, circulation, service, parking.
. Construction / project cost analysis.
.. Updated project phasing plan.
Work with a project advisory group and the Roseville project representative to define the
scope and direction for these projects.
Prepare a project description for each proposed building that includes the mission and
intent of the facility and a description of the programs and services to be incorporated.
Prepare a listing of space requirements for each building element, including an associated
listing of defining programmatic needs to be accommodated.
Develop diagrams and / or descriptions of the relationships between major building sub-
units and with ~tlier City Center building / site elements.
Establish site requirements - access, circulation, service, parking, etc. - for each building
element.
Prepare a construction / project cost budget for each building element, using developed
building areas and comparable building type unit cost factors.
Prepare updated project phasing analysis and pian demonstrating the proposed sequencing
of new building development, renovation and occupancy strategies. .
Program requi~ements will be developed through int~ra~t.~o.n with departmental managers /
_,', d:irectors, No. broad staff or public participation / interaction is anticipated.
The Owner will provide relevant background documentation (prior meeting / interview
notes, previous reports, current space allocation data, building plans, etc.).
------
-
.
..
Mr. Steve Sarkozy, City Manager
August 29, 2000
Page 3
This program documentation does not include assessment of condition of existing
buildings, nor does it include a description of the scope of required renovation.
,PROJECT SCHEDULE
It is anticipated this study will be completed over a ten- to twelve-week time period. The
following general schedule of activities and meetings are planned:
Week One
Project start-up meeting
Weeks Two, Three & Four
Departmental head interviews 1 initial data collection
Information compilation 1 analysis 1 organization
Preliminary program 1 scope 1 budget analysis
Weeks Five, Six & Seven
Project advisory group meeting 1 review - preliminary data
Departmental head information review & refinement 1 second data collection
Preliminary document update 1 draft program development
Draft cost 1 budget development
Draft phasing plan update development
Weeks Eight & Nine
Project advisory group meeting 1 review - complete draft documentation
Departmental head information review & refinement
Draft document update 1 refinement
Weeks Ten & Eleven
Project advisory group meeting 1 review - final draft
Final report preparation
Week Twelve
Project advisory group meeting 1 presentation - final report
. PROJECT DELIVERABLES
" A fiii.':ilconcept program document will be produced which includes the separate
documentation of the individual buildings and the other City Center project requirements
information developed. 15 copies of the 8 V2 x 11 inch bound report will be delivered.
A draft final report will be distributed prior to completion for review by the project
r~presentative and advisory group.
Other working papers will be distributed during the study process to facilitate discussion,
review and refinement.
- --------
Mr. Steve Sarkozy, City Manager
August 29, 2000
Page 4
COMPENSATION
For Basic Services rendered, the Owner, agrees to compensate the Architect monthly on
the basis of a multiple of two and one-half (2.5) times Direct Personnel Expense to an
estimated professional fee of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) plus Reimbursable
Charges at cost for expenses incurred by the Architect, the Architect's employees and
consultants in the interest of the Project. Reimbursable Charges are in addition to the
compensation for Basic Services and are estimated to be $3,000.
Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct salaries of all the personnel engaged on
the Project and the cost of mandatory and customary contributions and benefits.
Reimbursable Charges include the costs of travel expenses; long-distance communications;
reproduction and mailing; data processing; automated drafting; photographic production
techniques; and any state or local taxes imposed on services by the Architect for the Project.
Payments for professional services rendered and for Reimbursable Charges shall be made
monthly upon presentation of the Architect's invoices. Payments due the Architect under
this Agreement will include a service charge of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month
or the maximum permissible by applicable law, whichever is less, on any amount not paid
within thirty (30) days after the date of an invoice.
Compensation for services shall be subject to adjustment if the scope of work changes
substantially or the duration of the Project extends beyond sixteen weeks from
commencement of the project.
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
This Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Law.
The Owner shall provide all necessary information for this Project, and the Architect shall
be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of such information.
The Owner shall designate in writing a representative authorized to act in the Owner's
behalf, and shall furnish required information, approvals and decisions as expeditiously as
necessary for the orderly progress of the Architect's services. For the purposes of this
Agreement, the Owner's designated representative is Mr. Steve Sarkozy.
Because of factors beyond the control of the Architect and the Owner, any bid amounts,
negotiated construction costs or other costs may vary from estimates or evaluations which
the Architect may prepare. Accordingly, the Architect does not warrant such estimates or
evaluations.
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days' written notice
should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no
fault of the party initiating the termination. In the event of termination not the fault of the
-
.
;
.,
:
Mr. Steve Sarkozy, City Manager
August 29, 2000
Page 5
Architect, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed to termination
date, including all termination charges.
This letter is the entire Agreement between the Owner and the Architect. Changes or
additions in this Agreement must be in writing and must be signed by both the Owner and
Architect
Acceptance of this Agreement by separate instrument is limited to the terms in this
Agreement, and the Architect hereby expressly objects to any different or additional terms
contained in any other instrument of acceptance, whether in form of purchase order,
acknowledgment, acceptance or other document.
If this Agreement is satisfactory, please return one signed and dated copy.
Respectfully submitted,
Accepted by,
ELLE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
By:
By:
Name:
Title:
Proiect Director
Title:
Dated:
August 29, 2000
Dated:
By:
~tL_
By:
Name:
Lee F. Anderson
Name:
Title:
Proiect Planner
Title:
Dated:
August 29, 2000
Dated:
ATTACHMENTS
None
'ff?7/lf
'&&,". ~ jc~ lc ;--:;;z
~2.. 'ZaO
J~t' cc. a.c.&d p~ \M:h:t.
Roseville City Center Task Force Outline
Timeline:
May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
November 2000
December 2000
January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
Presentation of draft outline
Approval of draft outline
Search for project director
Hire project director
Work like Crazy!!!
Presentation of Proposal
Referendum
Process:
. Council and Parks & Recreation Commission will hold special
sessions with project director and the public to discuss
proposed projects.
. The Council, Parks & Recreation Commission, and the
Roseville and Mounds View School boards will hold various
joint meetings to gather input on the process.
. Only projects agreed to by unanimous consent of the City
Council will be submitted to the voters.
. Council and Parks & Recreation Commission members will be
respo.nsible for selling proposal to the city.
. Independent "Vote Yes" committee will be needed to be set up
independent of the city for purposes of raising and spending
funds.
o
fJ:Q
S.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION
Department Approval:
Manager Approval:
DATE: 01/18/00
ITEM NO:
Agenda Section:
REPORTS
Item Description:
City Center Task Force Draft Reports (PF# 3119)
1.0 REQUESTED ACTION
I'
1.1
The City Center Task Force was appointed by the City Council in 1998 to establish a vision
and a plan for the City Center. The City Center Master Plan was one of the concepts in the
Comprehensive Plan that was to be complete after the original adoption in1994. The Task
Force has completed Phase 1 of the report and has a draft of the document ready for
discussion. The draft report recognizes the long-term nature of this project, the needed
vision, proposed uses and financial implications, and boundaries of the City Center District.
1.2 The Task Force has worked for twelve months with urban planning consultant Kim Way to
prepare a 40-year vision and the uses that may be included in the plan. During that time they
have met at least monthly and taken a tour of community centers and recreation centers
throughout the suburban metropolitan area. They have also reviewed city surveys, socio-
demographics for the area and heard from the city departments regarding the users of
services and future needs.
1.3 Attached is the draft plan. It is still being updated, the new more concise booklet will be
printed in the near future.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1
Vista 2000, a community projection of what Roseville should look like in year 2000,
recommended that the city create a "sense of place" and "construct a Roseville Community
Center which would provide areas for seniors, gymnastics, court games, fitness, water play,
meeting space, cultural arts and social gatherings. The Vista teams also recommended"...a
pathway (sidewalk) system that connect park trails with major civic buildings, recreational
and cultural facilities and shopping facilities",
In 1994 the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. Within that plan (and the 1998 plan)
was an implementation programming which included creating a city center master plan.
(Section 11, p.3) A goal of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan is to "Create a master-planned
Civic Center Complex for government, life safety, public recreation and specialized housing
located on land surrounding the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road C".
(Section 3, p.17, #16)
PF3119 - RCA (01/17/00) - Page I of3
/0'0
\ \ib
2.2 The proposed City Center area is currently designated in the Comprehensive Plan for park,
civic uses, high-density housing, low density housing, and school uses.
2.3 In addition to existing parks, three primarily civic uses are proposed within the District - a
government center, community center, and a recreation center. Complementary uses
proposed may include accessory retail uses and higher density housing (probably senior).
Private sector provision (rather than city government) of recreation and complimentary retail
space and programming are still considered a viable part of the master plan.
2.4 The master plan provides for improved pathway and sidewalk access to the community
buildings and public park facilities.
2.5 A very important issue to be resolved is whether new police, fire, and public works facilities
will be created to serve the community needs for the next 40 to 50 years. One solution is a
public safety building. Another is an expanded police center in city hall and a new, separate
fire station, the location and needs for which the Fire Chief is working on at this time.
Finally, public works needs and locations need to be addressed. The complete master plan
cannot be accomplished without a public works move - probably to a more industrial site
2.6 Adjacent to County Road C is the Burlington Northern railway right-of way (now leased to
Minnesota Transfer). A portion of this right-of-way is already being abandon in Hennepin
County. It is possible that the rail line in Roseville, including the area adjacent to the city
center site may be abandon in the future. A City policy is to acquire such abandon rail lines
for public use for pathways or transit uses. Because the City Center would be a natural
pedestrian or transit stop for most residents, the rail line right-of-way could be an asset to the
city center and the adjoining property,
3.0 STAFF COMMENTS & FINDINGS
In reviewing the draft plan, staff had the following comments:
3.1 The City's Comprehensive Plan map designates portions of the County Road C and
Lexington area for civic uses and the remainder for residential, and park uses. The zoning of
the site is single family (R-1), general business (B-4), and multi-family three to twenty-four
units per acre (R3-A). The proposed uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan map.
3.2. The City's Comprehensive Plan text currently specifically does address these parcels and the
concept of a city center. The policies within the plan also provide direction to eliminate
blight, upgrade neighborhoods with a mix of compatible uses, and provide access to
community and recreation resources. The proposed uses are consistent with the
comprehensive plan goals and policies.
3.3 County Road C and Lexington should be the "Gateway" to the City Center with medians,
PF3119 - RCA (01/17/00) - Page 2 of3
plantings, lighting, pathways, etc. Lexington Avenue currently has a capacity of 18,000
vehicle trips per day, with a current use of 14,000 vehicles per day. County Road C also has
a capacity of approximately 18,000 vehicle trips per day, with current use of approximately
11,000 vehicle trips. By year 2020 Lexington is expected to increase to 17,000 trips, while
County Road C will increase to 14,500 trips. Turning lanes could increase the capacity at the
comer of Lexington and C, recognizing the many of the proposed uses already exist on the
city center site, there appears to be adequate capacity to serve the proposal. As new facilities
are proposed, the potential traffic should be re-examined.
3.4 Utilities are available and have capacity for any use the city center proposal anticipates.
4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends further
discussion ofthe next steps in the refinement of this process - a type of Phase Two study to
do the detailed planning and financial analysis.
5.0 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
On December 16, 1999, the City Center Task Force by consensus, recommended
approval of the draft plan.
6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION
Provide discussion and direction for next steps of City Center process.
Attachment: Draft master Plan and Development Strategy
Q:\CITYCEN1\PF3 I I 9-PCA(0 I 1700).doc
PF3119 - RCA (01/17/00) - Page 3 00
1
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION
Department Approval: Manager Approval:
~
Item Description: City Center Task Force Draft Reports (PF# 3119)
DATE: 01117/00
ITEM NO:
Agenda Section:
REPORTS
1.0 REQUESTED ACTION
1.1 The City Center Task Force was appointed by the City Council in 1998 to establish a vision
and a plan for the City Center. The City Center Master Plan was one of the concepts in the
Comprehensive Plan that was to be completed after the original adoption in1994. The Task
Force has completed Phase 1 of the report and has a draft of the document ready for
discussion. The draft report recognizes the long-term nature ofthis project and the needed
vision, and identifies proposed uses and financial implications, and boundaries of the City
Center District.
1.2 The Task Force has worked for twelve months with urban planning consultant Kim Way to
prepare a 40-year vision and the uses that may be included in the plan. During that time they
have met at least monthly and taken a tour of community centers and recreation centers
throughout the suburban metropolitan area. They have also reviewed city surveys, socio-
demographics for the area and heard from the city departments regarding the users of
services and future needs.
1.3 Attached is the draft plan. It is still being updated, the new more concise booklet will be
printed in the near future.
2.0 PROJECT POLICY BACKGROUND
2.1
Vista 2000, a community projection of what Roseville should look like in year 2000,
recommended that the city create a "sense of place" and "construct a Roseville Community
Center which would provide areas for seniors, gymnastics, court games, fitness, water play,
meeting space, cultural arts and social gatherings. The Vista teams also recommended "...a
pathway (sidewalk) system that connect park trails with major civic buildings, recreational
and cultural facilities and shopping facilities".
In 1994 the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. Within that plan (and the 1998 plan)
was an implementation programming which included creating a city center master plan.
(Section 11, p.3) A goal of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan is to "Create a master-planned
Civic Center Complex for government, life safety, public recreation and specialized housing
located on land surrounding the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road C".
PF3119 - RCA (01/17/00) - Page 1 of3
0'0
\\~
j
2.2 The proposed City Center area is currently designated in the Comprehensive Plan for park,
civic uses, high-density housing, low density housing, and school uses.
2.3 In addition to existing parks, three primarily civic uses are proposed within the District - a
government center, community center, and a recreation center. Complementary uses
proposed may include accessory retail uses and higher density housing (probably senior).
Private sector provision (rather than city government) of recreation and complimentary retail
space and programming are still considered a viable part of the master plan.
2.4 The master plan provides for improved pathway and sidewalk acc~ss to the community
buildings and public park facilities.
2.5 A very important issue to be resolved is whether new police, fire, and public works facilities
will be created to serve the community needs for the next 40 to 50 years. One solution is a
public safety building. Another is an expanded police center in city hall and a new, separate
fire station, the location and needs for which the Fire Chief is working on at this time.
Finally, public works needs and locations need to be addressed. The complete master plan
cannot be accomplished without a public works move - probably to a more industrial site
2.6 Adjacent to County Road C is the Burlington Northern railway right-of way (now leased to
Minnesota Transfer). A portion of this right-of-way is already being abandon in Hennepin
County. It is possible that the rail line in Roseville, including the area adjacent to the city
center site may be abandon in the future. A City policy is to acquire such abandon rail lines
for public use for pathways or transit uses. Because the City Center would be a natural
pedestrian or transit stop for most residents, the rail line right-of-way could be an asset to the
city center and the adjoining property.
3.0 ST AFF COMMENTS & FINDINGS
In reviewing the draft plan, staff had the following comments:
3.1 The City's Comprehensive Plan map designates portions of the County Road C and
Lexington area for civic uses and the remainder for residential, and park uses. The zoning of
the site is single family (R-l), general business (B-4), and multi-family three to twenty-four
units per acre (R3-A). The proposed uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan map.
3.2. The City's Comprehensive Plan text currently specifically does address these parcels and the
concept of a city center. The policies within the plan also provide direction to eliminate
blight, upgrade neighborhoods with a mix of compatible uses, and provide access to
community and recreation resources. The proposed uses are consistent with the
comprehensive plan goals and policies.
3.3 County Road C and Lexington should be the "Gateway" to the City Center with medians,
PF3119 - RCA (01/17/00) - Page 2 of3
.'
plantings, lighting, pathways, etc. Lexington Avenue currently has a capacity of 18,000
vehicle trips per day, with a current use of 14,000 vehicles per day. County Road C also has
a capacity of approximately 18,000 vehicle trips per day, with current use of approximately
11,000 vehicle trips. By year 2020 Lexington is expected to increase to 17,000 trips, while
County Road C will increase to 14,500 trips. Turning lanes could increase the capacity at the
comer of Lexington and C. recognizing the many of the proposed uses already exist on the
city center site, there appears to be adequate capacity to serve the proposal. As new facilities
are proposed, the potential traffic should be re-examined.
3.4 Utilities are available and have capacity for any use the city center proposal anticipates.
4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends further
discussion ofthe next steps in the refinement of this process - a type of Phase Two study to
do the detailed planning and financial analysis.
5.0 T ASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
On December 16, 1999, the City Center Task Force by consensus, recommended
approval of the draft plan.
6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION
Provide discussion and direction for next steps of City Center process.
Attachment: Draft master Plan and Development Strategy
Q:\CITYCENT\PF3119-PCA(O 11700),doc
PF3119 - RCA (01/17/00) - Page 3 of3
Morrison, Pat
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Welsch, Dennis
Thursday, January 13,200011 :33 AM
'keith. h. wietecki@Emasters.com'; 'Kim_ Way@ellerbebecket.com'
Driscoll, Margaret; Sa rkozy , Steve; Morrison, Pat
Jan. 18 informal presentation to City Council
The City Center Task Force Draft Report is on the agenda for the City Council next Tuesday, beginning at 6:30pm. I'm still
assuming you both can make the meeting. Attached is the staff introductory report. The Council has received a draft plan
~
and will get a second copy in their packet.
PF3119-PCA(011700),
doc
Dennis Welsch
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, Mn. 55113
Phone: 651-490-2232; Fax 651-490-2931
See Roseville's Internet Home Page at: www.ci.roseville.mn.us
1
OD
, \f)'
\:
.'4
MINNESOT A
City Center Study
Supporting Demographics
Roseville Comprehensive Plan, Book 2
December, 1999
Prepared by:
John Carpenter. Insight Mapping and Demographics
And
City of Roseville Community Development Staff
,v i':lori a ':L)mmd~\\C ITY C E?\T. S 1I ppo rt i ng D.:mograph ic" do.:
\ ry~u\"
.
.
.
...
City Center Supporting Demographics
The Roseville City Center stud;: included a task to define the resident users and the needs
they may have served by the City Center facilities. For study purposes. two types of users
were identified: the pedestrian user \\'ho could walk up to Y:! mile to the Center. and the
residents who live or work more than ~': mile from the Center. For study purposes. the
area within a \IS mile radius is called the City Center Neighborhood.
Within the liS mile radius of the Center. the characteristics of the population hm'e changed
dramatically in the past ten years. partially because the neighborhood is naturally aging
and partially from the new single occupant in-migration to apartments. condos. and senior
housing projects. While the City Center neighborhood population (9.275) has remained
stable, increasing by less than 225 residents (2'-+%), the household units have increased
by over 475 units (12%). In 1999. the resident count per household was down slightly to
2.09 residents per household. The number of 1 person households has increased
dramatically (58%), while other types of larger households have declined by at least 14%.
The population average age increased by 5 years to 45, while the head of household
average age increased to 57 years. Tn tenns of household age, the largest increase (91 %)
was for those over age 75. The second largest increase (38%) was for the 45 to 54 age
group. The heads of household under age 34 declined by 21 %. Thirty-six percent of the
heads of household population are now over the age of 65.
-------
I>
Futur~ Population Tr~nds - \\hat W C\pl'ct in the IlC\t 1 () : e3rs ,- is l)(1\iuus. I'hc :,cni,\r:, ~.
\\'i 11 conti nue to age in place and remai n hlO'al th jlO'r. k)nglO'r. Those \)\'lO'r :;:; \\'i II C,)I1l i nue t,\
grow as a percent of the n~ighborhood population to o\er 3:;00 of populatioll. in pan
becaus~ of the number of baby boomers and because of th~ comparati\eJy good heallh
and natural longe\'ity of the residents. ..\t this lime it is unclear \\'ho \\'ill replace the
seniors and baby boomers. but three scenarios appear possible:
. Will it be more mid-career. t\\'O income households buying the nh)re
expensi\'e single Llmily detached housing': (This is similar Il1 thc findings I~\r
neighborhoods soulh of High\\ay 36. i Such t3milies \\'jlj bring dependent. hut
older children and senior adults \\ith them.
. Will it be household forming young families with small children. bu: ing
affordable small rambler housing') Probahly no1. unless there arc signiticant ~.
tinancial incenti\'es to buy in these neighborhoods, By comparison to the city as a
whole. the four planning districts which surround the city center area. :'l)ung
family households are relatiwly stable. declining to approximately 16 percent \)1'
the total households. (Other areas in the community are more hard hit by this type
of decline.)
. Will seniors continue to age in place and. as they lea\'e. be replaced by
seniors while the existing population a]so ages':
~.
:;
-
.
("
.
. /\1!UI1U1U10J Jlp U!41!,\\ J,\!1 01 S10!UJS J10Ul
(1!l1lJJ110) 1;)B111B 01 pJSI1 Jq .\lInpSOd111d I!!.\\ 1J1UJJ J41 JJ1:BJp 1B4A\
01 pUB 1J41J1.[1\\ JU!Ul1J1JO 'SJ!1!.\!1JB UO!1BJlJJ1 pUB !B!JOS U! ~nUd!J!!-IBd 01
;;->I1U!1UOJ 01 SlUJP!SJ1 1.[JI1S\\OIlB 011UB110dUl! Jq I!!,\\ (SUO!1UJ!UI1U1U10JJ!J1
B!,\ SB !IJ,\\ SB) SlpBd ;1U!)jjB\\jlIB!.I1SJpJd B!,\ SUO!1;)JUUOJ
';1U!101!UOUl J!U!P !K)!pJUI J1!I!J1BS pUB i~dB1J41 J!1J!lPB/!BJ!S.'\qd
J71P liP JJJIO PlnOJ ldllIJJ JlU 'SJ!I!,\!1JB pm; SUlB1Z101d 10!UJS
JpL\OJd P!1101.[S UO!1BJOI J1BU1J1IB JLUOS 10 JJllI;lJ ;llj1 J;;->lj1d1.[\\ JpLJJO 'SJBJ.\
l];)1 1\:;l11 ;::141 .10.1 pOOl{.!Oq lj;}l;:lll J;"\ll1;:1 ,) ,\1! J ;"\ljl .I 0 .I01J;l5 (;1l1 !\\OJiJ pm~)
19;'iJt;j ;ll(1 ;:'!q II!,\\ Sj8UO!SS;:'IJ01d J;llSJU ,\Ic!lUJ pUC SJOIUJS ;:'I,\11J8 JZ!uiJOJJ(J
,-
l.
.
',\IISJJ,\!P 1B41 U!B1JJ
pUI~ PCJ111.: 01\1!UJLUC lIC sr,lo 11.[71nolp ;;->q Plnoljs JJll1JJ ,\l!J JlU '1I1JJO
~;;->op ;I;]UBljJ SB UO!1Bp1c!od pUB SPlolj;:\snolj .10 lJS ;:\SJJ,\!P JJOUl B J.\JJS
l)I11Cjd llU;:'!1 ;]UO! JI;];:'IW.I1S B ;:\,\U1.[ OSIB lnq 'SllIdplSdJ .10 P)jJ8l11 J1B!pJlUlll!
;llj1 ;:\,\lJS '\ID J41 U!ljl!\\ S1UJpIS;:\J ;:\lj1 S8 IIJ,\\ sr SJ!l!J .10 ,\I!Ulll11lUOJ
\IUnOJ ,\;:\SlUU(j lU;lljl.10U 'JJp801Q ;:\lj1 0IP)j1UI'\ 'l;:\IU;:\J lU;:\UlU1;:'1,\OiJ
d01S ;:\UO ;:\J!,\lJS !P~I C SC 11;:\,\\ SC 5;:\!1L\IlJC ICIJOS pUC 1']J!S,\l!d JP!,\OJd
'p;:\71P SB Ild\\ 58 ;'iuno\ Jljl 10.~ SdJL\JdS JO J;'ill1U C JPL\OJd ';:'!!q!\:;:\U J8 '[
:SPOOlJloq4~!Jl' .1JJUJ:J ,\J!:J J4J J.UJS OJ SUO!JEpUJWWOJJ~
.
.. '
,
.' ,
Prepare Il'1r sc\me additi\'1nal :- \.uth ~\l'ti\ili\:'s, The I'nl'lllatinn of scI1\l\.1 ~l~l'
youth under age 1-+ should remain swbk \\'i lh th~ in-m igration u f c:\ i sti ng
I and.2 adult Illid- career l~lmily households, In most nfth~s~ familil's
both adults \\ill ha\c jobs, :\ recreation and community center must
pro\'ide opportunities for children \\hose parents hi1\'e less li-ee time, ,'\
state of the art da\' care and after school care facilit\,. as \\ell as katllres
. .
for young childr~n I such as a children's I'la:-grouncl. librJry and inlCrI1l't
center) may attract m\'1re rel'lJcl'm~nt Lunities to the cummunit:-.
-1-. In addition to safe. \\ellmaintaineJ neighborhood connector path\\a:- s.
and e\'en \\ithin 1 c mile nf City Cent~r. in inclement \\eather additi\.nal
transportation may bl' necessary Il.r thl' aging population. The Cl'nter
should be designed as transit and "drop-oft" friendly. as \\ell as prO\ idl'
for a transit hub where both public and pri\,ate buses and \'ans can drop off
and pick up riders,
5, Rose\'ille has a strong and relatively stable work force of o\'er 37.000
employees. of which approximately 75% live outside the city. These "8
hour residents" should be a market for programs. activities. and amenities
of the City Center. Done successfully. the City Center may be a
"recruitment" tool for new companies and employees as well as new
families and households.
..j
.
~.
t.
~.
.
.
.
, ..
6,
Ch:mge j~ ine\'itable, One ()ut~ide I,hy~ic:d change the cpuld alter th\.'
programs and acti\'ities \\ithin the City (('nter is transit. If the Center
continues to be a communit\ transit hub. it \\ill be more accessible to
young and old. In addition. if the adjacent rail line con\erlS to a dedicated
bus line. it \\ould pro\ide an opportunity for \\orkers to board the transit
system at the (ity (enkr. After \\ork at their job site. they could return W
the Rose\'ille (it\ (enter site for programs or acti\'iti('s and a short \\alk
or ride to thei r henne. The transi t syst('m could make the (i ty (ent('r nwr\.'
accessible to the full time commuting \\orker. age .25 to 6-+,
() ClTYc E',;-j' Clt\ Center Supporting Den1l1graphi",J(),
.;;
~ fo
_~ 1;'
~ t-:)
=:-.. :. -
~ =: _.':=' '0 0
..~~~..-~~ ~.... -~ii;tAPo!\.....
11 : =: "- -..
- ~ rNi.
~~""aa~o-..''-':;::aO "''-1
~~~~~~~~i i
~!
.1
Ii ~(j
I, ti}~'
~ r" g,
.f)i'"" I J
IiI ~~
_e~ ~
~1!..
001 ~'-
i ~L ~
....
_ E~
.....u.O'-c V>'" &0. - 0"
~~~~~~~~4a
................ . . ~:.
"
.... ..
~:;::'::::::Q 'C ~
.. ~
",,.
co-
i~~~S2~~ ~~
;~~gf~~~ ~[
~~
..
li~~~~~~ j[
HamUne Avenut'
.)
...
.
~ "fT
.
~
:.
~
r
.
Lextngton A~
Vtc-toria Str('C't
Hr
H~
!i~"
r
i
.Da.I.t'Street
~
~
~
I
.~ \
J ~: L
I .. ()
~
-t>
. ..
......
.......
..
b
....
~
~
....
~
~
.,
-
-
Fmnnaw ~-=--
.- . .IIioI'
. -- - '. -
~ ~~' oc,.~
. .
.---
&ndUn9 Awnu_ -
.......
(A)
~
~
, .
o
o
Q.
(!:)
o
,
,
.
;,p
r:;=w
:0 V
!,'-cco,
..
;>..
~=---~-'_.-=-~
&c, '
g;~~ .
~-"
~
o .. \i
-
o
\)
.....---
"
, '
G
Western Aoeft.1LC'
Rice Street
.
......
, -
...... .~~<.'y'
.;:~:()-
--'"
D
~--l Q~
~. ,_,'.-c, ~~c..,L--=, ""tJ . ,~"- '"
,ft~..~-~. ~~" ..
10. --~ . . ,=/ " ..'-
,'~.-. _c ':::~- 0--
.....
,,' ~= _:-0-
to
~ --,
"
- -.-. -~._'_':'':'''-..::;--:::~._--
- '~~:~"ii
._-~-~-::::
v
,..
---- -
,--.:._-~ -
-- ---
c:7..cJ
.
--..,"
-------
~- -- ---- - --.
\C)- -' -,
, -..
=- _..-. ----...~
-
.
.~------=-_...., .-....-:.- ~
CJ
,-
p 13
"00
~t::::)'
cc CJ
, D
~,
e ,
.
~
- .--
.,
.
~-
..
q
..
..
"
,-
Iq
<::>
i',D
u:u:QI
O\.
<2J
~
~
. .
.
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER AREA - PLANNING DISTRICTS 3, 4, 7 & 8
Demographics Trends - 1990 to 1999 (Excluding Nursing Homes and Dormitories)
1990 Census
Count Percent
Population by AQe
. Under Age 5 546 6,0%
. Age 5 to 14 950 10,5%
. Age 15 to 24 1,035 11.4%
* Age 25 to 34 1 .404 15,5%
* Age 35 to 44 1,238 13,7%
* Age 45 to 54 1,018 11,2%
,. Age 55 to 64 1,142 12,6%
* Age 65 to 74 1,082 11.9%
* Age 75 to 84 543 6,0%
* Age 85 or Older ......J.M 1,1%
Total 9,062 100,0%
Average Age 40,9
Households by AQe
. Under Age 25 144 3,6%
. Age 25 to 34 695 17,5%
,. Age 35 to 44 688 17,3%
* Age 45 to 54 576 14,5%
. . Age 55 to 64 650 16.4%
*Age65t074 720 18,1%
. Age 75 or Older ~ 12,5%
Total 3,968 100,0%
Average Age 53.4
Population Per Hhold 2,28
Home Ownership
* Owner Occupied 2,758 69,5%
* Renter Occupied 1,210 30,5%
Total 3,968 1 00,0%
Size of Household
* 1 Person 1,214 30,6%
- 1 Adult 622 15.7%
- 1 Senior 592 14.9%
,. 2 Persons 1.477 37.2%
. 3 Persons 552 13,9%
* 4 Persons or More 725 18,3%
Total 3,968 100,0%
1999 Estimate
Count Percent
413
778
927
1,250
1.410
1,300
983
1,031
864
319
9,275
44,7
137
582
731
795
603
652
945
4.445
56,6
2,09
2,957
1,488
4.445
1,922
1,059
863
1 .451
475
597
4.445
ChanQe '90-99 Pet. of City Total
Count Percent 1990 1999
(133) .24.4% 30,0% 27,3S'o
(172) .18,1 % 27,7% 27,2%
(108) -10.4% 24,2% 24,3%
(1 54) .11 ,0% 26,2% 26,2%
172 13,9% 27,8% 26.7%
282 27,7% 26,3% 27.4%
(159) -13,9% 30,5% 27 70/0
(51 ) -4,7% 35.2% 313So
321 59,1% 37,8% 35,0%
215 206,7% 40,6% 42,9%
213 2,4% 28,6% 28 1 Si:
38,9 426
4,5%
8.4%
10,0%
13,5%
15,2%
14,0%
10,6%
11.1 %
9,3%
3.4%
100,0%
3,1% (7) .4,9%
13,1 % (113) -16,3%
16,4% 43 6,3%
17,9% 219 38,0%
13.6% (47) .72%
14,7% (68) .9.4%
21,3% 450 90,9%
100,0% 477 12,0%
66,5% 199 7,2%
33,5% 278 23,0%
-
100,0% 477 12,0%
43.2% 708 58,3%
23,8% 437 70.3%
19.4% 271 45,8%
32,6% (26) -1,8%
10,7% (77) -13,9%
13,4% ~ -17,7%
100,0% 477 12,0%
20,6% 23,5Sc
26,7% 257%
27,9% 26,2SO
26,8% 28,50,(,
30,3% 2860:0
35,7% 32,OSc
38.7% 37,5%
29,7% 29.4%
50,8 54,0
2,37 2,19
30,3% 29,0%
28.4% 30,3%
29,7% 29.4%
33,0% 33,1%
27,2% 28,7%
42,5% 41,0%
29,4% 28,2%
25,5% 26,6%
28,0% 25,2%
29,5% 29,4%
Sources: 1990 Census of Population STF.1 (Census Slock level data)
1999 Estimates from Insight Mapping & Demographics,lnc, Derived from data contained in school
census reports, county property tax and dwelling data, utility billing data, drivers license and
automobile registration records,
.
Revised December 10, 1999
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER AREA. PLANNING DISTRICT 3
Demographics Trends. 1990 to 1999 (Excluding Nursing Homes and Dormitories)
~.
1990 Census
Count Percent
Population by AQe
* Under Age 5 243 7,3%
* Age 5 to 14 333 10,0%
* Age 15 to 24 413 12,4%
* Age 25 to 34 653 19,6%
* Age 35 to 44 433 13,0%
* Age 45 to 54 309 9,3%
* Age 55 to 64 382 11.4%
* Age 65 to 74 368 11,0%
. Age 75 to 84 178 5,3%
. Age 85 or Older --2:l 0,8%
Total 3,339 100,0%
Average Age 38,9
Households by Aqe
. Under Age 25 91 6,0%
. Age 25 to 34 355 23.3%
* Age 35 to 44 260 17,0%
* Age 45 to 54 178 11,7%
* Age 55 to 64 226 14,8%
. Age 65 to 74 252 16,5%
* Age 75 or Older --1Q1 10,7%
Total 1,526 100,0%
Average Age 50,5
Population Per Hhold 2.19
Home Ownership
* Owner Occupied 845 55.4%
.. Renter Occupied 681 44,6%
-
Total 1,526 100,0%
Size of Household
* 1 Person 508 33,3%
* 2 Persons 557 36,5%
* 3 Persons 229 15,0%
* 4 Persons or More 232 15.2%
Total 1,526 100.0%
1999 Estimate
Count Percent
195
289
336
533
523
429
335
334
285
--.-.12
3,335
42.4
93
339
327
287
217
218
283
1,764
52,1
1,89
992
772
1 .764
962
461
157
184
1,764
5,8%
8,7%
10,1%
16,0%
15,7%
12,9%
10,0%
10,0%
8,5%
2,3%
100,0%
ChanQe '90-99 Pet. of City Total
Count Percent 1990 1999
(48) -19,8% 13,3% 12,9%
(44) -13,2% 9,7% 10,1 %
(77) .18,6% 9,7% 9,3S:
(120) -18.4% 12,2% 11,5%
90 20,8% 9,7% 9,9%
120 38,8% 8,0% 9,0%
(47) .12,3% 10,2% 9.4~'c
(34) .9,2% 12,0% 10,1cQ
107 60,1% 12.4% 11 ,6C~
49 181,5% 10,5% 10 ,2c:
(4) -0.1% 10,5% 10,2c,:,
38,9 42,8
5,3% 2 2,2% 13,0% 15 90 c
19,2% (16) .4,5% 13,6% 15,O~'c
18,5% 67 25,8% 10,6% 11,7c.:
16,3% 109 61,2% 8,3% 10,30': ~.
12,3% (9) -4,0% 10,5% 10,3%
12.4% (34) .13,5% 12,5% 10,7%
16,0% 119 72,6% 12,8% 11,2c:
-
100,0% 238 15,6% 11,4% 11,7%
50,8 54,0
2,37 217
56,2% 147 17.4% 9,3% 9,7%
43.8% 91 13.4% 16,0% 15,7%
-
1 00,0% 238 15,6% 11.4% 11.7%
54,5% 454 89,4% 13,8% 15,0%
26,1% (96) -17.2% 11,1 % 10,2%
8.9% (72) .31.4% 10,6% 8,8%
10,4% ~) .20,7% 9,0% 7,8%
100.0% 238 15,6% 11,3% 11,7%
Sources 1990 Census of Population STF.l (Census Block level data)
1999 Estimates from Insight Mapping & Demographics,lnc, Derived from data contained in school
census reports. county property tax and dwelling data, utility billing data, drivers license and
automobile registration records,
-
December 7 1999
f.
.
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER AREA. PLANNING DISTRICT 4
Demographics Trends - 1990 to 1999 (Excluding Nursing Homes and Dormitories)
1990 Census
Count Percent
Population bv AQe
* Under Age 5 125 5,9%
* Age 5 to 14 225 10,6%
* Age 15 to 24 250 11,8%
* Age 25 to 34 252 11,9%
* Age 35 to 44 320 15,1 %
,. Age 45 to 54 308 14,6%
* Age 55 to 64 287 13,6%
*Age65t074 243 11,5%
* Age 75 to 84 78 3,7%
* Age 85 or Older ~ 1,2%
Total 2,113 100,0%
Average Age 40,7
Households bv AQe
* Under Age 25 26 3,0%
* Age 25to 34 105 12,0%
* Age 35 to 44 169 19,3%
. * Age 45 to 54 172 19,6%
* Age 55 to 64 161 18.4%
*Age65t074 166 18,9%
. Age 75 or Older ~ 8,9%
Total 877 100,0%
Average Age 53.6
Population Per Hhold 2.41
Home Ownership
* Owner Occupied 772 88,0%
* Renter Occupied 105 12.0%
-
Total 877 100,0%
Size of Household
,. 1 Person 237 27,0%
,. 2 Persons 331 37,7%
* 3 Persons 110 12,5%
* 4 Persons or More 199 22,7%
-
Total 877 100.0%
1999 Estimate
Count Percent
59
210
208
165
287
295
244
279
220
~
2,075
47,7
10
52
117
172
146
177
272
946
62.7
2,19
795
151
946
387
286
104
169
946
2,8%
ChanQe '90.99 Pet. of City Total
Count Percent 1990 1999
(66) -52.8% 6.9% 3,90"0
(15) -6,7% 6,6% 7,3%
(42) -16,8% 5,8% 5.7%
(87) .34,5% 4.7% 3,6%
(33) .10,3% 7,2% 5.4';/0
(13) .4,2% 8,0% 6,2%
(43) .15,0% 7,7~'c 690'0
36 14.8% 7,9% 8,5S'c
142 182,1 % 5.4% 8,9%
83 332,0% 9,8% 14,5~'0
-
(38) -1,8% 6.700 63~0
38.9 42,8
10,1 %
10,0%
8,0%
13,8%
14,2c/c
11,8%
13.4%
10,6%
5,2%
100,0%
1,1% (16) -61,5%
5,5% (53) .50,5%
12.4% (52) .30,8%
18,2% 0,0%
15.4% (15) .9,3%
18,7% 11 6,6%
28.8% 194 248,7%
100,0% 69 7,9%
3,7% 1, 7~'~
4,0% 2,3%
6,9% 4,2%
8,0% 6,2::0
7,5% 6,9%
8,2% 8,7%
6,1% 10,8%
6,6% 6,3%
50,8 54,0
2,37 2,17
8,5% 7,8%
2,5% 3,1%
6,6% 6,3%
6,4% 6,0%
6,6% 6,3%
5,1% 5,8%
7,7% 7,1%
6,5% 6,3%
84,0% 23 3.0%
16,0% 46 43,8%
-
100,0% 69 7,9%
40,9% 150 63.3%
30,2% (45) .13,6%
11,0% (6) -5,5%
17,9% ~ -15,1%
100,0% 69 7.9%
Sources: 1990 Census of Population STF-1 (Census Block level data)
1999 Estimates from Insight Mapping & Demographics, Inc, Derived from data contained in school
census reports, county property tax and dwelling data, utility billing data, drivers license and
automobile registration records,
.
December 7,1999
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER AREA - PLANNING DISTRICT 7
Demographics Trends - 1990 to 1999 (Excluding Nursing Homes and Dormitories)
~.
1990 Census
Count Percent
Population by AQe
" Under Age 5 104 5.3%
" Age 5 to 14 248 12,7%
" Age 15 to 24 205 10,5%
" Age 25 to 34 281 14,4%
* Age 35 to 44 297 15,3%
* Age 45 to 54 210 10,8%
, Age 55 to 64 262 13.5%
'Age65t074 225 11,6%
" Age 75 to 84 107 5,5%
. Age 85 or Older --.!J. 0,4%
Total 1,947 100,0%
Average Age 40,2
Households by AQe
, Under Age 25 11 1.4%
, Age 25 to 34 123 15.9%
" Age 35 to 44 156 20,2%
" Age 45 to 54 112 14,5%
, Age 55 to 64 148 19,1 %
. Age 65 to 74 137 17,7%
, Age 75 or Older --E.. 11,2%
Total 774 100,0%
Average Age 53,8
Population Per Hhold 2,52
Home Ownership
" Owner Occupied 581 75.1%
* Renter Occupied 193 24,9%
Total 774 100,0%
Size of Household
* 1 Person 168 21,7%
.2 Persons 305 39.4%
* 3 Persons 119 15,4%
* 4 Persons or More 182 23,5%
Total 774 100,0%
1999 Estimate
Count Percent
114
148
211
273
349
359
217
217
144
~
2,061
42,9
19
128
169
209
131
131
126
913
53,9
2,26
680
233
913
328
320
126
139
913
5,5%
7,2%
10,2%
13,2%
16,9%
17,4%
10.5%
10,5%
7,0%
1.4%
Chanqe '90-99 Pet. of City Total
Count Percent 1990 1999
10 9.6% 5.7% 7,5So
(100) .40,3% 7,2% 5,2S;'
6 2,9% 4,8% 5.8%
(8) .2,8% 5,2% 5.9%
52 17.5% 6,7% 6,6%
149 71,0% 5.4% 7,6%
(45) .17 ,20,;' 70S'0 6 Fe
(8) -3,6% 7,3S= 6.6':=
37 34,6% 7.4% 5,800
21 262,5% 3,1% 3 gOe
-
114 5,9% 6,F: 6 30e
38,9 428
100 OS':
2,1% 8 72,7%
14,0% 5 4,1%
18,5% 13 8,3%
22,9% 97 86,6%
14,3% (17) -11.5%
14,3% (6) .4.4%
13,8% 39 44,8%
100.0% 139 18,0%
1,6% 3,300
4,7% 5.700
6,3% 6,O~e
5.2S'c 7 5~: 4.
6,9% 6,2%
6.8% 6 .4 0'0
6,8% 5,0=/=
5,8% 6,0%
50,8 540
2,37 2,17
6,4% 6.7%
4,5% 4,7%
5,8% 6.0%
4,6% 5,1%
6,1% 7,1%
5,5% 7,1%
7,0% 5.9%
5.8% 6,0%
74,5% 99 17,0%
25,5% 40 20,7%
-
100,0% 139 18.0%
35.9% 160 95,2%
35.0% 15 4,9%
13.8% 7 5,9%
15,2% ~ -23.6%
100,0% 139 18.0%
Sources: 1990 Census of Population STF.1 (Census Block level data)
1999 Estimates from Insight Mapping & Demographics,lnc, Denved from data contained in school
census reports, county property tax and dwelling data, utility billing data, drivers license and
automobile registration records,
-
December 7 1999
fl
.
.
, ~ -
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER AREA - PLANNING DISTRICT 8
Demographics Trends - 1990 to 1999 (Excluding Nursing Homes and Dormitories)
1990 Census
Count Percent
Population by AQe
* Under Age 5 74 4.4%
*Age5t014 144 8,7%
* Age 15 to 24 167 10,0%
* Age 25 to 34 218 13,1 %
* Age 35 to 44 188 11,3%
* Age 45 to 54 191 11,5%
* Age 55 to 64 211 12,7%
* Age 65 to 74 246 14,8%
* Age 75 to 84 180 10,8%
* Age 85 or Older ~ 2,6%
Total 1,663 100,0%
Average Age 46,2
Households by AQe
* Under Age 25 16 2.0%
-- Age 25 to 34 112 14,2%
* Age 35 to 44 103 13,0%
. * Age 45 to 54 114 14.4%
* Age 55 to 64 115 14,5%
* Age 65 to 74 165 20,9%
* Age 75 or Older ~ 21,0%
Total 791 100,0%
Average Age 58,3
Population Per Hhold 2,10
Home Ownership
* Owner Occupied 560 70,8%
.. Renter Occupied 231 29.2%
-
Total 791 100,0%
Size of Household
* 1 Person 301 38,1%
* 2 Persons 284 35,9%
* 3 Persons 94 11.9%
· 4 Persons or More 112 14,2%
Total 791 100,0%
1999 Estimate
Count Percent
45
131
128
165
251
217
187
201
215
106
1,646
49,7
15
63
118
127
109
126
264
822
62,2
2,00
490
332
822
403
226
88
105
822
.
2,7%
8,0%
7,8%
10,0%
15,2%
13,2%
11.4%
12,2%
13,1%
6,4%
100.0%
ChanQe '90-99 Pet. of City Total
Count Percent 1990 1999
(29) -39,2% 4,1% 30%
(13) -9,0% 4,2% 4,6S/:
(39) -23.4% 3,9% 3,5%
(53) .24,3(% 4,1% 3.6%
63 33,5% 4,2% 4,7%
26 13,6% 4,9% 4.6%
(24) -11.4% 5,6% 5, 3~c
(45) -18,3% 8,0% 6,P"
35 19,4% 12,5% 8,7%
62 140,9% 17.2% 14,3%
(17) -1,0% 5,2% 50Se
38,9 42,8
1.8% (1 ) -6,3%
7,7% (49) .43,8%
14,4% 15 14,6%
15,5% 13 11.4%
13,3% (6) -5,2%
15,3% (39) .23,6%
32,1% 98 59,0%
100.0% 31 3.9%
2,3% 26=;"
4,3% 2.8%
4,2% 4,2%
5,3% 4,6SC
5.4% 5,2%
8,2% 6,2%
13,0% 10,5%
5,9% 5.4%
50,8 54,0
2,37 2,17
6,2% 4,8%
5,4% 6,8%
5,9% 5.4%
8,2% 6,3%
5,7% 5,0%
4,3% 4,9%
4,3% 4.4%
5,9% 5.4%
59,6% (70) -12,5%
40.4% 101 43,7%
100,0% 31 3,9%
49,0% 102 33.9%
27.5% (58) -20,4%
10.7% (6) .6.4 %
12,8% -I!) -6,3%
100,0% 31 3.9%
Sources 1990 Census of Population STF.1 (Census Slack level data)
1999 Estimates from Insight Mapping & Demographics,lnc, Derived from data contained In school
census reports, county property tax and dwelling data, utility billing data. drivers license and
automobile registration records,
December 7, 1999
.
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER
MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
.
Prepared for:
Roseville City Center Task Force
Prepared by:
Ellerbe Becket, Inc.
800 LaSalle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
.
(r~C\
~~
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
City Center Task Force
City Staff Assistance
III. Process
Definition of the Roseville City Center District
Purpose of the City Center District
Market and Anticipated Users of the City Center District
Planned Uses within the City Center District
.
.
IV.
V.
VI.
.
'The Vision"
Categories of Vision, Ideas and Specific Uses
Public Participation and Input Process
Program
Concept Alternatives
Parkways
Main Street
City Square
Development Alternatives
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Option E
Option F
VII. City Center Master Plan (.
Option A
Option B
VIII. Implementation Strategy
IX. Conclusions/Next Steps
t.
(.
-
.
.
.
.
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Illustration A - Study Area Context
Illustration B - City Center Study Area
Illustration C - Aerial Photograph of City Center Study Area
Illustration D - City of Roseville Departmental Needs Assessment
Illustration E - Parkways Concept Alternative
Illustration F- Main Street Concept Alternative
Illustration G - City Square Concept Alternative
Illustration H - Development Alternative - Option A
Illustration I - Development Alternative - Option B
Illustration J - Development Alternative - Option C
Illustration K - Development Alternative - Option D
Illustration L - Development Alternative - Option E
Illustration M - Development Alternative - Option F
Illustration N - City Center Illustrative Master Plan - Option A
Illustration 0 - City Center Illustrative Master Plan - Option B
Illustration P - City Center Aerial Perspective
Illustration Q - Perspective of Recreation Center
Illustration R - Perspective of City Square and Housing
Illustration S - Implementation Strategy Chart
Illustration T - Staging Option Al
Illustration U - Staging Option A2
Illustration V - Staging Option A3
Illustration W - Staging Option A4
Illustration X - Staging Option AS
Illustration Y - Staging Option B 1
Illustration Z - Staging Option B2
Illustration AA - Staging Option B3
Illustration BB - Staging Option B4
Illustration CC - Staging Option B5
~.
f.
(e
-
.
.
.
.
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
I. Executive Summary
The City of Roseville adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, attaching an implementation
strategy to create a master plan for a city center to be located generally around the intersection of
Lexington Avenue and County Road "C",
In 1998, the City Council created a citizen task force with a charge to define the city center
concept, identify the community needs, and make specific recommendations to the City Council.
The City of Roseville and a Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Planning Grant provided funds
for this task force study.
Definition of the Roseville City Center District
Study Area Context
The initial area used to study the City Center District was defined by a ten minute walking radius
from the intersection of Lexington A venue and County Road C, as illustrated in Exhibit A. A
ten-minute walking distance is generally about one-half mile.
City Center District
After initial vision and program discussions, the Task Force, with input from the Roseville
Community defined a more specific City Center District for further planning and design. This
district is defined by County Road C to the South, Lexington Avenue to the East, Woodhill
Avenue to the north and the boundary with Howard Johnson Park to the West.
Purpose of the City Center District
The purpose of the City Center District is to create a centrally located area within Roseville with
a unique sense of community, a gathering place with social intimacy; a destination which focuses
on community participation and meetings, recreation, government services, and may have
complementary educational, retail and housing uses.
Market and Anticipated User of the City Center District
The market and users for this district are residents ofRoseville, the adjacent communities and the
regional, national, and worldwide users of the specialized services offered within the district.
Planned Uses within the City Center District
The planned public and privately owned uses foreseen within this district are envisioned to be a:
· source of pride
· communal gathering place; a hub of Roseville community activity for all ages
· center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
· locale for the development of mental and physical health
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Draft 11.10.99
. venue for government, education, cultural, and sport activities
~.
. marketplace for complementary services and goods
. intergenerational residential living of varied styles
"The Vision"
Roseville City Center provides a safe and architecturally unique "landmark" for the City's
government, community and recreational needs. It is highly accessible via the City's network of
parkways, tree-lined streets, transit services and pedestrian walkways that connect to the Center's
mixed use street level area, providing a variety of indoor and outdoor spaces. The City Center
takes advantage of the area's topographic changes that help to reinforce its aesthetic continuity
with Central Park. The human scale and design continuity of it's campus setting is reinforced by
the high level of ornamentation that specifically identifies this "place", as Roseville City Center.
City Center Program
City Hall (Existing)
:t 20,000 - 30,000 SF
Ice Arena (Existing)
:t 36,000 SF
John Rose Oval (Existing)
Recreation Center
:t50,000 SF
~.
Indoor Pool
:t20,000 SF
Community Center
:t 50,000 SF
Residential
:t 120 - 150 Units
Ancillary Commercial
:t 30,000 SF
Parking Structure
150 Spaces/Level (450 - 600 Spaces)
Public Safety Building (Optional)
:t 50,000 SF
Concept Alternatives
Based on the vision statement and program, three basic arrangement of uses (government center,
community center, recreation center) were explored for Roseville City Center. The three
concepts were referenced as Parkways, Main Street and City Square. In each of the alternatives it
is assumed that the Public Works garage will be relocated off-site and that the fire station and
license bureau will either be accommodated on-site, in a different location, or off-site.
After review and discussion by the Task Force it was agreed that the City Square concept best fit
with the goals, objectives and vision set for Roseville City Center.
(.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
2
Draft 1 I.1 0,99
-
.
.
.
.
City Center Development Options
Based on the City Square concept alternative selected by the Task Force, six development
alternatives were explored that looked at further refinement and arrangement of the City Center
uses. The five alternatives are based on several work sessions with the City Center Task Force.
A study model was prepared with appropriately scaled building blocks. The Task Force was able
to move the building blocks around to study the two and three-dimensional relationships between
uses. From these work sessions the options were recorded and illustrative development plans
were prepared for further discussion and refinement.
In each option the new north/south road and city square are recognized as fixed elements of the
plan. In addition to the primary uses, government center, recreation center and community
center, several options look at providing new multi-family housing as part of the program,
The Task Force also recognized that the Recreation Center should be physically attached to the
existing recreational facilities, Ice Arena and John Rose Oval. It also recognized that the Indoor
Pool had the ability to act as a gateway and "sign post" from County Road C into the City Center.
As a result each option locates the Indoor Pool along County Road C and the Recreation Center
attached and linked to the Ice Arena.
The Task Force also recognized that the existing City Hall building had value and that while its
use might change the building should be retained in all options.
As in the development of the initial concept, the development options assume that the public
works garage is relocated off-site and that the fire station and license bureau is relocated either
on-site or off-site. One option looks specifically at a new public safety building as a primary
component of the City Center.
Underground parking was ruled out as too expensive and thus each option addresses above ground
parking. Due to the parking demand for the existing and new uses on the site, it is assumed parking
will be handles in both surface and structured parking. The Task Force is very concerned that surface
parking not overwhelm the character and quality of the City Center environment.
City Center Master Plan
After review and discussion of the six development alternatives outlined above, the City Center
Task Force selected Development Options B (Exhibit H) and C (Exhibit I) for further testing,
refinement, costing and phasing analysis. One refinement was made to Option B, the parking
structure was moved to form the north edge of City Square and the residential was moved to the
northeast comer of the City Center. This moved the parking closer to the Community Center and
provides a contiguous residential parcel.
Option A
Master Plan Option A (Exhibit M) builds on Development Option B described above. As noted
earlier, the parking ramp has been moved to the west along the north/south road to provide more
direct access to the Community Center (40,000 SF). The ground level of the parking structure
would be reserved for service commercial uses to activate the north edge of City Square. The
footprint of the parking structure would accommodate 150 spaces/level. Based on the needs of
the City Center this parking structure would be 3 - 4 levels or 450 to 600 spaces.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
3
Draft 11.1 0,99
120 - 150 apartment/condominium residential units are established in one contiguous
development along the east edge of City Square and fronting onto Lexington Avenue. The ground
floor of the residential, along City Square would be reserved for service commercial uses.
Parking for the residential would be in the basement level under the units. Access to this parking
would be directly from Lexington Avenue,
41
All other components remain the same as described in Development Option B described above;
City Hall Expansion, Community Center, Recreation Center, Indoor Pool, Residential, Parking
Structure, Parking Ramp, Surface Parking
Option B
Master Plan Option B (Exhibit N) is the same as Development Option C described above, except
for the elimination of the "wintergarden". A smaller enclosed connection is proposed be the
community center and city hall. A small enclosed gathering space is part of this connection and
as part of the connection to Central Park from the City Center.
Option B also illustrates a one level parking ramp over the existing Ice Arena surface parking lot,
to ensure adequate adjoining parking for the recreation center, indoor pool, Ice Arena and John
Rose Oval.
Other components of Master Plan Option B remain the same as Development Option C; City Hall, Ice
Arena Complex, Community Center, Recreation Center, Indoor Pool, Public Safety Building, Parking
Structure, Parking Ramp, Surface Parking.
Implementation Strategy
~I
The implementation strategy chart for Roseville City Center (Exhibit BB) identifies each major
project proposed in Master Plan Options A and B and their size, cost, time frame,
implementation, partnership and next steps. Each Option has been divided into five phases or
stages of development. The phases/stages do not necessarily need to occur in order. Some may
occur at the same time and others may want to be implemented sooner due to public interest,
private sector interest, or need.
A plan has been prepared for each phase or stage of the process to illustrate the potential
evolution of the project. As has been discussed earlier, the Public Works facility should be
relocated before any new development ofthe City Center occurs. Minor improvements could be
made before the Public Work garage is relocated, but they would only be disrupted when it is
moved.
Option B illustrates temporary parking in place of the City Square in Phases/Stages 1 through 3,
prior to construction of the new public safety building and parking structure.
Conclusions, Recommendations and Next Steps
The City Center Task Force has concluded that Master Plan Options A and B provide 'viable
alternatives for consideration by Roseville Planning Commission and City Council. Both options
establish a new City Square as a new public gathering place and as a focus for a new Community
Center, Recreation Center and expanded City Government Center. Option A includes the
potential for introducing residential development that could help to offset public sector
~.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
4
Draft 11.10,99
-
.
.r
.
investment in the City Center. Option B includes a new Public Safety Center as a potential
component of the City Center.
The Roseville City Center Task Force recommends that the Planning Commission and City
Council take these recommendations under review as they consider the potential of developing a
new City Center for the City of Roseville. The Task Force recommends that additional and more
detailed studies be undertaken to confirm strategy, program, more definitive costs and time frame
for each aspect of Roseville City Center.
The next steps include:
. Planning Commission and City Council approve Roseville City Center Master Plan and
Development Strategy.
. Public Works prepares program for new Public Works Garage, location strategy and
relocation costs.
. Fire Department conducts a needs and location analysis to assess where Fire Station # I
should be located. Prepare program and preliminary plans for new fire station/Public Safety
Center.
. Police Department refines program and prepares preliminary plans for new police
facilities/Public Safety Center
.
. Parks and Recreation Department prepares detailed program and preliminary plans for
Community Center, Recreation Center and Indoor Pool.
. Community Development Department prepares development plans for reuse of Arona Center site.
. City seeks developer interest in residential development.
.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
5
Draft 11.10,99
'.
II. Back2round
(.
The quality of life in Roseville is of interest to all residents, especially those areas where we have
the opportunity to meet our neighbors and interact in a friendly civic setting. Much of this
interaction is focused around shopping, cultural, educational, civic, religious or recreational
activities. RosevilJe does not have a central meeting place where all these activities happen
together. Roseville lacks a "heart",
Traditionally, communities grew around centers of commerce, which were often the "main street"
of the town, village or city. Main streets provided the goods and services that supported the
community. Roseville, as a suburban outgrowth of Saint Paul, never developed a main street,
however, over time dispersed auto-oriented centers of commerce have grown up along major
transportation corridors.
Roseville's opportunity is to create a "main street", as part of new city center, that can provide a
"heart" for the community. The existing civic area, encompassing City Hall, Police Station, Fire
Station #1, Motor Vehicle License Department, Ice Arena and John Rose Minnesota Oval
provides the existing public facilities and infrastructure, centrally located in the community, that
might be expanded to establish Roseville City Center.
The Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy is an opportunity provided by
the City Council to help create a shared vision for a new city center that serves the citizens of
Roseville. It has provided the forum to openly discuss issues and opportunities, and to formulate
a long-term strategy to establish an exciting and vibrant mixed-use recreational and entertainment
center for our community.
City Center Task Force
~.
In 1998, Roseville City Council appointed a City Center Task Force, charged with preparing a
report with recommendations to the City Council and Planning Commission regarding the results
of their investigation and deliberations.
The members of the Task Force were selected from a wide array of backgrounds including;
residents, businesses people, educational, civic or religious representatives, and property owners
in the City of Roseville. The Task Force members are; Don Anderson, Scott 1. Bergs, Richard A.
Bates, Peggy Egli, Perrie N. Heitler, Anne M Hermes, Pat Johnson, Tom Johnson, Craig
Klausing,Lois Sinn Lindquist, Joseph Smith, Jan Vanderwall, Keith Wietecki. Keith Wietecki
was appointed Chair of the Task Force and Lois Sinn Lindquist was appointed as Vice Chair.
The City Council encouraged the Task Force to explore the following interrelated issues:
. What are the components of a successful City Center?
· What uses should be part of a successful Roseville City Center?
· What are examples of other successful City Centers; in the region, in the State of Minnesota,
in the U.S.?
. What is the current "body of knowledge" regarding, traffic, land use, utilities, drainage and
environmental issues that can be offered to residents and the City?
~.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy 6
Draft ILl 0.99
-
.
. 1.
2.
3.
4.
5,
6,
.
.
What are the positive features ofthe existing civic center?
How do existing civic and recreational uses fit with potential new uses?
What are the short and long-term land use issues that need to be resolved?
What are the traffic issues in tenns of site access and road capacity?
What environmental regulations need to be resolved in tenns of stonn water and
subsurface water quality and quantity, noise, air quality, etc?
What are the rights and responsibilities of adjoining property owners, City, County, etc?
. What are the specific issues to which changes should be considered (e.g, traffic lights,
railway corridor, high tension power lines, location of access points, etc.)?
. Should there be a change in land use zones in or near the civic center, and, if so, why and
what other uses?
. What role does the public and private sector play in improving/changes to the civic center?
How should Roseville's effort be coordinated with the County?
. What public "experts" are available to help the Task Force?
The Task Force was encouraged to access and utilize the resources ofthe Roseville Community
Development Department, Public Works Department and Parks and Recreation Department and
other agencies as part of their fact-finding mission. The Task Force was also encouraged to
involve other residents of the City for infonnation, subgroups and other work teams as needed.
City Staff Assistance
The staff liaison to the Task Force will be Dennis Welsh, Community Development Director.
Bob Bierscheid, Director of Parks and Recreation and Karl Keel, Director of Public Works will
also be key resources on the project. The City Council extends its thanks to each member of the
Task Force for your willingness to contribute your time and knowledge to the study and report.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
7
Draft 11.10,99
III.
Process
41
The City of Roseville adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, attaching an implementation
strategy to create a master plan for a city center to be located generally around the intersection of
Lexington Avenue and County Road "C".
The City Council created a citizen task force in 1998 wi.th a charge to define the city center
concept, identify the community needs, and make specific recommendations to the City Council.
The City of Roseville and a Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Planning Grant provided funds
for this task force study.
Definition of the Roseville City Center District
Study Area Context
The initial area used to study the City Center District (Exhibit A) was defined by a ten minute
walking radius from the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road C, as illustrated in
Exhibit A. A ten-minute walking distance is generally about one-half mile.
City Center District
After initial vision and program discussions, the Task Force, with input from the Roseville
Community defined a more specific City Center District for further planning and design. This clistrict
is defined by County Road C to the South, Lexington A venue to the East, W oodhill Avenue to the
north and the boundary with Howard Johnson Park to the West (Exhibit B).
-t
Purpose of the City Center District
The purpose of the City Center District is to create a centrally located area within Roseville with
a unique sense of community, a gathering place with social intimacy; a destination which focuses
on community participation and meetings, recreation, government services, and may have
complementary educational, retail and housing uses.
Market and Anticipated Users of the City Center District
The market and users for this district are residents of Roseville, the adjacent communities and the
regional, national, and worldwide users of the specialized services offered within the district.
Planned Uses within the City Center District
The planned public and privately owned uses foreseen within this district are envisioned to be a:
· source of pride
· communal gathering place; a hub of Roseville community activity for all ages
· center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
8
4t
· locale for the development of mental and physical health
Draft 11.10,99
-
.
'8
I
, ,:/1 ,
U.A1 Itt:~:, i "
L ,~', ~p T'1~) ):'C.J':.J:':; .:11 \ 0
;,>1" .
CJ [ b ;LJ ,I ::e, \: j
rr- u !.../
F= r--, -
II ' I. ..
~rr~- . i I -,
Ir- Q .J r ,..-- il oIC 0 ; I
I I
~II I !.. ,
IU U jl-r IU' LI i
~ j'l: .'.. I
1_ I 0 ; i
h n DC:: ~ tiC aC: ! I ~I "'. .. f i
l.. L IL- i '.,
I I I~I
\ I
oC:: c: 0 0 CJ I
i f0- ol
0 00 !
C C:J 0 0 0 0
.
I ~
-
!--
y-
o , f--
I C:J
II>> I
~ ==-
'.. ;=
,C
t CJ
I 000 0 0 0 d ~
~ p~ 0 CJ 0 0 0 '"
q.l I ~ ';;:"
I L "'I.J" !-u"' ~ CJ ./
-c..r -w- 1,/ -' " ..~\.
q L---::l,;:::; L. ::::::.- '~
Q 0 10'.
~ - .f D -';:;
Ir Ie 0 '/1 -
. . , I - ~
1= ~.,~ -~
l 0 pO rP 0
I .. , :r~ "" iii "-
" ,!, :'!.. i1i", "
, " ;, " "'. d . :"", !':;:;"~<)
b UO 0 '.:" I, r.
p 0 D , :;:,., i;.:,' , .
I- " ~ '-r. ' ~:c:,:,~;~:",' '2 :. ~
I-- .. '.' ::y. 5~ ,.' (':
R - \ :"", ':i"
~ I wD GorP CJoQ I cPblrvl/ -
c::; ...r-
~ I 0 D DO GJ 00 c:P liJrl~-
r---7=H 0 ' <..-
U ,rill' I---
~I 0
~,IQ I~I~IO ILJ II I n !11:J ,t:)1CJ
I ~jl! v
No ,00 ! \ 0 \ I I i n ,\! I ,J /
HI b--.....;. I I I oil 0 ! I \-1. ! ' I II'I'~
0:
, :51
OM
:=::. ~
" -
~~
'"
~"". .
<'~<:<
~
Q)
~
~
Q)
u
u
.~
;>
.~
u
~ !
~ e
~ ~=
k lig:
~ .-
I> !;'~
3 -..
l! ,-
'go ">:
~ Z1
o y
- .
~ ~
"
;.Jj
:":;,
13..
, ...
'f~
'..1:; ~
~~~
-~~
~.
~.
u
c::
o
.-
It
if)
~
-
-
~
.
. venue for government, education, cultural, and sport activities
· marketplace for complementary services and goods
"The Vision"
· intergenerational residential living of varied styles
Roseville City Center provides a safe and architecturally unique "landmark" for the City's
government, community and recreational needs. It is highly accessible via the City's network of
parkways, tree-lined streets, transit services and pedestrian walkways that connect to the Center's
mixed use street level area, providing a variety of indoor and outdoor spaces. The City Center
takes advantage ofthe area's topographic changes that help to reinforce its aesthetic continuity
with Central Park. The human scale and design continuity of it's campus setting is reinforced by
the high level of ornamentation that specifically identifies this "place", as Roseville City Center.
Categories of Vision, Ideas, Specific Uses
1.
2,
3,
. 4.
5.
6.
7.
8,
9.
Uses will be both indoor and outdoor.
City support services (roads, paths, parks, utilities, and safety) will be an integral
part of the design.
OperationaVmaintenance features will be designed with efficiency and
functionality.
,",
Emphasis will be placed on tone, character, sense of place, ambiance.
There will be both active and passive areas
Design will include expansion flexibility
The site will be a "site for all seasons", featuring seasonal events.
The public and private sectors will playa role in the design, financing and
construction either through collaborative work or partnerships.
Efficiency, durability, and longevity will be a part of all design.
Examples of specific uses identified for the City Center include the following:
1. Government Center
Updated fire/police facility; updated government complex - state, city, county;
government center schools; county service center
2. Community Center
.
Meeting rooms; teen center; service center; multi-purpose rooms; child care facilities;
volunteer organization spaces; perfonnance theatre; seminar theater; artIhistory center;
home/garden education facility; continuing education community center; Transit Village
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy 9
Draft 11.1 0.99
- a major transit facility, possibly Light Rail or Commuter Rail; conference facility;
solarium; storage space for center organizations; religious facility; CTV, city, cable
system; public access studio; satellite postal service; Mini-Conference Center; gallery
area; neighborhood promotion; massage center; community nurse/health services;
kitchen! reception area; technology center - internet access library; charter schools
t.
3. Recreation Center
Outdoor facilities; amphitheater; indoor swimming pool; indoor play area; indoor play
area and park; indoor tennis, park and recreation center offices; climbing wall, outdoor
track; basketbalVvolleyball gym; child play area; craft castle or room; private recreation
area; putting greens;
4. Complementary Retail
Food service/restaurants; neighborhood retail; kiosk/cart vendors; beauty/ barber shops;
service-retail; home office service center;
5. Complementary Housing
Mixed housing types for all ages and life styles;
6. Other Uses and Themes
Street level mixed use area; design that blurs distinction between indoor and outdoor;
specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; pathways between the facilities; land mark;
carefully planned parking facilities; a safe place to be; pathway access to community;
human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes; public art;
intergenerational activities/connections; aesthetic continuity to Central Park; quality
decorative ornamental lighting; design continuity; architectural design that breaks from
precedent; passive village square; design for flexible open ended growth; signage
(informational and directional); efficient street accesses; parkway-tree lined streets with
walkways; County Road C and Lexington as street entry with streetscape;
monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens; co-generation of energy.
t.
Public Participation and Input Process
The public participation process has involved monthly meetings with the City Center Task Force.
These meetings have been open to the Roseville Community and televised on cable television.
In addition, flyers describing the Task Force discussions and upcoming agendas have been mailed
to residents adjoining the City Center area and all other interested community members who have
requested this information. At the initiation of the process, a number of one-on-one interviews
were conducted with City Staff and community leaders who have been involved with past
planning initiatives. These interviews were used as part of the public input process and as
background to the City Center Master Plan process.
...'
~.
c.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
10
Draft 11.10,99
-
-
.
.
.
III.
Pro2ram
A preliminary needs assessment was undertaken by the City Departments to assess their space
needs (Illustration D). These space needs were combined with needs/development potential of
other City Center components to arrive at the development program outlined below,
Roseville City Center
City Hall (Existing)
:t 20,000 - 30,000 SF
Ice Arena (Existing)
:t 36,000 SF
John Rose Oval (Existing)
Recreation Center
:t50,000 SF
Indoor Pool!
:t20,000 SF
Community Center
:t 50,000 SF
Residential
:t 120 - 150 Units
Ancillary Commercial
:t 30,000 SF
Parking Structure
ISO Spaces/Level (450 - 600 Spaces)
Public Safety Building (Optional)
:t 50,000 SF
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Draft 11.10.99
II
City of Roseville
Department Space Needs as Noted in City Center Space Needs Inventory/Questionnaire
Existing EXisting Existing Existing Existing Exist1l1g Totals
Department ParklRec Police Finance,Accoun License Center Public Works i Enaineerinn
I !
Bldg name Activity Center I City Hall City Hall Old City Hall Public Works : Engineering
Address 2800 Arana I 2550CivicCenter [ 2550CivicCenter 2550CivicCenter 2560~ivicCent~ 2660CivicCenter
I I
Bldg Age (years. 38 I 27 22 50 I 30 ' I 25 , 192
! I i
Bldg, Size (s,f,) 36.000 2,000 1,000 2.500 52,000 ~ 1.000 94,500
i
Parcel Size (s.f,) 640,332 108,900 108,900 108,900 174,240 I 1,141,272
Employees at S~e 12 50 7 11 40 10 130
I
Employee Parking 14 30 7 8 50 ! 14 , 123
!
Customer Parking 123 10 4 60 0' 5 202
Interior City Parking 0 11 0 0 1171 4 132
Unique Features small gym indoor range Attractive Fiber Optic Serv i
1,1 ac, enclose J none
hotding cells Functional fule pump site I I
teen center Iod<er rooms Compact ! I ,
interview rooms ; I i
group storage records storage ;
reserve space
training rooms
,
Other Organizations MV School Reserves none none I
Explorers ; I
I
$0 I , i
$49,000 $0 $145,000 I
Bldg, Revenue I ! i $194,000
!
Leases MV, School I I i
j i I
ACCEL Academy
Bldg. Cond~ionlRepai Poor Poor,limited space Good Fair Older portion 01 Good Condition
bldg, {30,OOO S,
roof leaks agingl1imited spac needs new roof
mold/carpeting data privacy I
windows leak evidence rooms I
steam system locker space I
fine-up space I
Operational Condition functions well prisoner handling Good Fair none Good
but ineffident meeting rooms
reduce shared des I
technology space
Other Issues: storage space none none none
fl
~.
(e
Illustration 0
.
.
.
City of Roseville
Department Space Needs as Noted in City Center Space Needs Inventory/Questionnaire
New New New New New New Totals
Department Par1<lRec Police Finance.Accoun License Center Public Works i Enaineerin'a
Bldg name City Center City Center City Hall City Center Maintenance I City Hall
I
Activity Center Public Safety
Address 2660 Civ;cCenterDr 2660 CivicCenter[ 2660 CivicCente 2660 CivicCente unknown at this; 2660 C ivicCente
rime
Year Needed 2001 - Admin 2001 ' or sooner 2005 2005 unknown at thjsj 2005
2001, Comm, Spac time i
2002- Aquatics ,
2002. Rec, Space
Bldg, Size (s.l,)
Admin, 1,500 25,000 1,500 3,000 60,000 I 1,000 92,000
Comm,Space 25,000 I I ,
! ,
Aquatics 18,000 ,
Rec, Space 5,000
Art Space 16,000
Comm, Storage Spac 3,300
Child Care Area 1,000
Snack Bar 1,000 I
Indoor Play Area 4,200 I I I ,
Indoor Garden 10,000 I I
, I I
I I I
Parcel Size (s.l,) 174,240 108,900 0 0 217,800 i I 0 I 500,940
; I I
I
Employees at Site 14 30 8 12 12 I 10 86
Employee Parking 17 20 8 10 50 : 14 I 119
I I
; I ,
Customer Parking 175 20 4 70 5 : 5 279
Interior City Parking 0 25 0 0 133 I 4 162
I
Unique Features Par1<lrec Offices Security and keys Designed for Drive up for Tab Increase in yar~ none
Community Space Firearms Range High tech use space and new I
leisure Pool Cells salt storage faci, I
Fitness Area Sally Port I I , !
Indoor play space Prisoner Process i I I i ! ,
I I , i
Arts Space locl<er Rooms , i
I ! ,
Training Room i I
Inter, Rooms ! I I
, ! I
Other Organizations nla Fire? none none none none I
I i i , ,
I
Bldg, Revenue $80,000 $0 $0 $150,000 , ! $230,000
,
leases $0 $0 $0 i $0
Unique structures Cell Block 'none I I
I Parking Ramp none none none I
I High ceilings/slides Firearms Range
Climbing wall i
Ball area
Indoor playground ;
I
Indoor winter garde I
Storage bays
Operational Improve
, Activity connection! Fire and Police none Hi-Tech Wiring none none
Offices, meeting ro i
Storage near OVAL I
Unique Siting Issues Green space Easy Access for none none Industrial Use al none
Outdoor assembly employ&cuslomer ,
Pathway connect's !
i
Other Issues: Connect - Cen, Par Security none none ! none
Private Restaurant ;
I
Phvsical Therapy !
Illustration 0
IV. Concept Alternatives
-.
Based on the vision statement and program, three basic arrangement of uses (government center,
community center, recreation center) were explored for Roseville City Center. The three
concepts were referenced as Parkways, Main Street and City Square. In each of the alternatives it
is assumed that the Public Works garage will be relocated off-site and that the fire station and
license bureau will either be accommodated on-site, in a different location, or off-site.
A. Parkways
The Parkways Concept (Illustration E) builds on the desire of the City to reinforce Lexington
Avenue and County Road C as primary image corridors of the community. Plans have been
developed to "green" Lexington Avenue from Como Park north to Lake Josephine Park. Pieces
of this have been implemented along Central Park. County Road C is planned to be widened with
the addition of a median.
The Parkway Concept proposes arranging the three primary uses along Lexington Avenue and
County Road C to take maximum advantage of proximity and visibility. The Government Center
builds off existing City Hall and anchors the comer of Lexington and County Road C. The
Recreation Center fronts to County Road C and builds on the existing ice arena and John Rose
Oval. The Community Center fronts onto Lexington Avenue, Parking is located behind the
frontage uses in a multi-level parking structure.
The Parkway Concept envisions a high quality pedestrian amenity zone along Lexington Avenue
and County Road C with wide building setbacks, pedestrian walkways and landscaping. Major
building entrances would focus to the roadways, Secondary entrances would be provided form
the parking resources.
-.
Lexington A venue and County Road C are both arterial streets designed to move traffic
effectively and efficiently through Roseville. As a result on street parking is prohibited and curb
cuts are kept to a minimum. These streets do not lend themselves well to ":front~ge" streets.
Frontage streets are where buildings are constructed close to the street, there is on street parking
and traffic is slow moving.
B. Main Street
The Main Street Concept (Illustration F) envisions constructing a new north/south street through
the City Center area that links directly from County Road C to Woodhill Drive. This street would
establish a new "Main Street" for the City of Roseville and would provide the organizing element
for the new City Center uses.
c. City Square
The City Square Concept (Illustration G) builds on the Main Street Concept through the addition
of a City Square at the heart of the City Center area with the new uses arranged around it. The
City Square not only provides and organizing element for the City Center but also provides a new
civic gathering place for the community.
A new Recreational Center would be located to the west ofthe existing ice arena, fronting on to
the new north/south street, and providing a new front door to the ice arena and John Rose Oval.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy 12
41
Draft 11.1 0.99
-
.
.
~,
'=--'
~ i
"--,
I j !
-,
: r----i ; I i J 1 /
'! -I I c6[EJ'-.J "
'r 11---11 " ..!'
j~:~~ i :
----..----------
.
z ----:
,i !-----' I
~ i " I f rai'--' I 'Sl
~ I ~i -L ' L.J
. I 10 --'j t=:J L ~'i
1
!
ai
((11
~I
(/), I
z!
I f!
-
.
t
r
I.
--
--
-'
.
~I~I
i~;I_-1
,. !!
I,~,-r,
/........... t
' '
.'_L,./
[
I
I
I
i
I
.
I,
~~
Ii
Ii ;,.;
i~ If
r /i.e'
I /!,I"
" IX
1)/
e./
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'~
.9
+-I
('j
W
+-I
9
~
..........
~
The recreation center would b\a~ched and physically linked to the ice arena and John Rose
Oval establishing and integral Jnd well-linked facility.
~.
The Government Center would build off of City Hall and form the southern edge to the City
Square. The Government Center would accommodate an expanded police department, relocated
license bureau, parks and recreation department, and potential public safety facilities.
The Community Center is located on the north side of the City Square.
Parking to support the new uses in the Main Street Concept is proposed to be located in an
underground facility under the City Square of in an above ground multi-level parking structure.
Based on a review and discussion of these three alternatives by the City Center Task Force it was
decided that the City Square Concept provided the most appropriate infrastructure and
arrangement of uses based on the vision and goals set for the project.
~'
t.
~
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
f.
13
Draft Il.l 0.99
-
.
.
.
.
V. Development Alternatives
Based on the Main Street Concept Alternative selected by the Task Force, six development
alternatives were explored that looked at further refinement and arrangement of the City Center
uses. The five alternatives and based on several work sessions with the City Center Task Force.
A study model was prepared with appropriately scaled building blocks. The Task Force was able
to move the building blocks around to study the two and three-dimensional relationships between
uses. Fonn these work sessions the options were recorded and illustrative development plans
were prepared for further discussion and refinement.
In each option described below the new north/south road and city square are recognized as fixed
elements of the plan. In addition to the primary uses, government center, recreation center and
community center, several options look at providing new' multi-family housing as part of the
program.
The Task Force also recognized that the Recreation Center should be physically attached to the
existing recreational facilities, Ice Arena and John Rose Oval. It also recognized that the indoor
pool had the ability to act as a gateway and "sign post" from County Road C into the City Center,
As a result each option locates the Indoor Pool along County Road C and the Recreation Center
attached and linked to the Ice Arena.
The Task Force also recognized that the existing City Hall building had value and that while its
use might change the building should be retained in all options.
As in the development of the initial concept, the development options assume that the public
works garage is relocated off-site and that the fire station and license bureau is relocated either
on-site or off-site. One option looks specifically at a new public safety building as a primary
component of the City Center.
Underground parking was ruled out as too expensive and thus each option addresses above
ground parking. Due to the parking demand for the existing and new uses on the site, it is
assumed parking will be handles in both surface and structured parking. The Task Force is very
concerned that surface parking not overwhelm the character and quality of the City Center
environment,
Development Option A
Option A (Illustration H) contemplates constructing a new City Hall building on the north side of
city square and a front door on the north/south road. A new Community Center occupies the
existing City Hall building (20,000 SF). The existing building is expanded to the east (20,000
SF) for a total of 40,000 SF on two levels.
Parking to support the City Center is located on the west side of the City Square and along
Lexington Avenue, A "wintergarden" space provides a year round enclosed open space as well
as a link between the community center and the parking structure. 150 spaces per level can be
accommodated in the parking structure. Approximately 4 - 5 levels would be needed to provide
600 - 700 parking spaces. The ground floor of the parking structure, along the City Square edge
would have supporting service commercial uses. Additional parking is provided in a new one
level ramp over the existing Ice Arena parking lot and surface parking to the north of the Ice
Arena,
Roseville City Center Master P1an and Development Strategy
14
Draft 11.1 0 .99
<C
c:
o
.-
+-'
C.
o
-
.
~.
41
:r:
c:
o
.-
4--1
cd
t.....
~t
~
-
-
-
.
New multi-family housing is provided in the north east corner of the City Center and west of the
new City Hall.
Development Option B
Option B (Illustration I) proposes keeping City Hall in its existing location with a new 20,000 SF
addition to the west that would accommodate an expanded police station and relocated license
bureau and parks and recreation department.
A new Community Center (40,000 SF) is located to the north of the Recreation Center effectively
linking all the recreation and community center functions together in one complex.
New multi-family residential is located on the north and east sides of the City Center with ground
level service commercial uses.
Structured parking is located in the northeast corner of the City Center in a location that
minimizes its impact on the City Square. Access to the parking can be obtained fTom the City
Square of directly fTom W oodhill Drive. Additional parking is located in a one level ramp over
the existing Ice Arena surface parking lot and in a surface parking lot to the north of the Ice
Arena.
The corner of County Road C and Lexington A venue has been kept undeveloped. A new
pedestrian connection is illustrated to Central Park through an enhanced landscaped environment.
.
Development Option C
Option C (Illustration J) proposes keeping City Hall in its existing location with no expansion.
A new Community Center (40,000 SF) is proposed on the east side of City Square. A
"wintergarden" at the corner of County Road C and Lexington A venue provides a year round
indoor public gathering place and a strong link between City Hall and the Community Center.
A new Public Safety Building (50,000 SF) is proposed on the north side of City Square that
would accommodate a new police station and fire station, The police station would be the portion
of the building fTonting onto City Square, The fire station would be attached to the police station
and situated in a manner for easy vehicle flow in and out ofthe facility. The design would
encourage inbound non-emergency vehicle movement fTom the new north/south road, with out
bound on call emergency vehicles accessing directly on to W oodhill Drive and Lexington
A venue.
Parking would be provides for all uses in a new parking structure (150 spaces/level, 4 - 5 levels)
located in the northeast comer of the City Center with access fTom City Square and Woodhill
Drive. The ground floor of the parking Structure would be reserved for police vehicle storage
and police force and firefighter parking. Additional parking would be provided in surface
parking lots to the north and south of the Ice Arena.
Development Option D
.
Option D (Illustration K) locates a new City Hall on the east side of City Square also orienting to
Lexington A venue.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
15
Draft 11.1 0,99
',:''."
....... .
m
c
o
.-
.....
c.
o
-
.
-.
4.
~
~
o
.-
..j...-I
cO
1:4.
if)
:=)
--
--
~
.
.
.
'r,. ';""
,:.. ""
.:}ifi~
t.
~.
~
c:
0
.......
+->
C"d
C ~
c: ' '
-
0 -
.- ---
..,
C-
O
-
-
, '
.
.
.
A new Community Center is located in the existing City Hall building combined with a new
20,000 SF expansion to create a 40,000 SF facility on two levels.
A "wintergarden" located at the comer of Lexington Avenue and County Road C provides a year
round enclosed public gathering space, a new link to Central Park from the City Center and a
strong connection between the new City Hall and Community Center.
New multi-family housing is located on the north side of City Square on each side of the
north/south road. The ground floor of the housing would be reserved for service commercial uses
that support the City Center.
A parking structure is located in the northeast comer of City Center (150 spaces/level, 4 - 5
levels). Additional parking is provided in a one level parking ramp over the Ice Arena surface
parking lot and in a surface parking lot to the north of the Ice Arena.
Development Option E
Option E (Illustration L) proposes maintaining City Hall in its present location and providing a
40,000 SF addition that would house a new Community Center.
A "wintergarden" is shown at the comer of County Road C and Lexington Avenue that provides a
year round enclosed public gathering space and a new link to Central Park from the City Center.
Multi-family residential is illustrated on the north and east side of City Square. The ground floor
of the housing would be reserved for service commercial uses that support the City Center uses.
Parking for the residential would be located in a basement level underneath the complex. The
northern portion of the residential could have a separate private access off of Wood hill Drive that
would also be access to the underground parking.
A new parking structure is proposed to the north of the Ice Arena (150 spaces/level, 4 - 5 levels).
Additional parking would be provided in a one level-parking ramp over the existing Ice Arena
surface parking lot.
Development Option F
Option F (Illustration M) is similar to Option E, except the parking structure has been located on
the east side of City Square to provide a closer proximity to City Hall and the Community Center.
The "winter garden" provides a strong enclosed linkage fOnTI the parking structure to City Hall
and the Community Center.
Residential is shown north of the Recreation Center, fronting unto the north/south road.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
16
Draft 11.1 0,99
, .
4.
~.
~
c::
0
.-
4-1
W ro
c: .... t.-..
C\: ~
0 t-
.-
..,
c. ......-
......-
0 ~
--
. ,
.
.
~
c
0
.-
. LL 4--J
ro
C t.....
0 4--J
.- if)
....., ~
a. -
0 -
~
, .
VII,
City Center Master Plan
(.
After review and discussion of the six development alternatives outlined above, the City Center
Task Force selected alternatives B and C for further testing, refmement, costing and phasing
analysis. One refinement was made to Option B, the parking structure was moved to form the
north edge of City Square and the residential was moved to the northeast corner of the City
Center. This moved the parking closer to the Community Center and provides a contiguous
residential parcel.
Option A
Master Plan Option A (Illustration N) builds in Development Option B described above. As
noted earlier, the parking ramp has been moved to the west along the north/south road to provide
more direct access to the Community Center (40,000 SF). The ground level of the parking
structure would be reserved for service commercial uses to activate the north edge of City Square.
The footprint of the parking structure would accommodate 150 spaces/level. Based on the needs
of the City Center this parking structure would be 3 - 4 levels or 450 to 600 spaces.
120 - 150 apartment/condominium residential units are established in one contiguous
development along the east edge of City Square and fronting onto Lexington A venue, The ground
floor of the residential, along City Square would be reserved for service commercial uses.
Parking for the residential would be in the basement level under the units. Access to this parking
would be directly from Lexington Avenue,
All other components remain the same as described in Development Option B described above.
. City Hall Expansion
. Community Center
. Recreation Center
. Indoor Pool
. Residential
. Parking Structure
. Parking Ramp
. Surface Parking
Option B
~.
Master Plan Option B (Illustration 0) is the same as Development Option C described above,
except for the elimination ofthe "wintergarden". A smaller enclosed connection is proposed be
the community center and city hall. A small enclosed gathering space is part of this connection
and as part of the connection to Central Park from the City Center.
..
C'
,
41
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
17
Draft 11.10.99
'" I
,.
.
. ...~......-,
'J",-'-~
~~
I'"
: ~..,(>;,
~ -~
.:. '~.,
,.."~".'.'.'i
~-~
.~~~.
...1..' .'" .'...\:.~.'
'I:
~,~~
~...;. .
.
. CC
c::
0
'-
4-1
cd
:......
4-1
if)
;::::;
---
---
-
Option B also illustrates a one level parking ramp over the existing Ice Arena surface parking lot,
to ensure adequate adjoining parking for the recreation center, indoor pool, Ice Arena and John
Rose Oval.
Other components of Master Plan Option B remain the same as Development Option C.
. City Hall
. Ice Arena Complex
. Community Center
. Recreation Center
. Indoor Pool
. Public Safety Building
. Parking Structure
. Parking Ramp
. Surface Parking
Illustrations P, Q and R provide an artist impressions of the character and quality envisioned for
Roseville City Center. Illustration P is a birds-eye perspective looking southeast over the City
Center towards Central Park. The Jon Rose Oval is in the lower right corner of the sketch.
Illustration Q provides an eye-level view looking along the proposed north/south road streetscape
and the front fac;:ade of the proposed Recreation Center.
Illustration R provides an eye-level view from City Square east towards the proposed residential
development. A comer of the parking structure with ground level commercial can be seen on the
left edge of the sketch.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Draft 11.1 0.99
.. t"~ .
t.
t.
~.
18
" ,
.
.
.
VIII. Implementation Strateev
The implementation strategy chart (Illustration S) for Roseville City Center identifies each major
project proposed in Master Plan Options A and B and their size, cost, time frame,
implementation, partnership and next steps. Each Option has been divided into five phases or
stages of development. The phases/stages do not necessarily need to occur in order. Some may
occur at the same time and others may want to be implemented sooner due to public interest,
private sector interest, or need.
A plan has been prepared for each phase or stage of the process (Illustrations T - CC) to illustrate
the potential evolution ofthe project. As has been discussed earlier, the Public Works facility
should be relocated before any new development of the City Center occurs. Minor improvements
could be made before the Public Work garage is relocated, but they would only be disrupted
when it is moved.
Option B illustrates temporary parking in place of the City Square in Phases/Stages 1 through 3,
prior to construction of the new public safety building and parking structure.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
19
Draft 11.10,99
f-
w
~
V ~
w "
cc I 0>
"
w E
CD ~
c:::
w S,
-' .. ~ ~
-' ...
UJ :J
In " C
.. '" I
.. "
.. ~
Z
S!
t ~
~
C Z
0
U
>0-
Ct
QI
~
[!!
~
VI
~
C
QI
E
Q.
o
Gi
>
QI
Q
"'CI
C
ra
c
ra
ii:
-
QI
~
lit
ra
~
-
QI
~
C
QI
V
~
V
~
'>~
QI-
IItra
0-
a::c
I:!
..
f
..
D.
~
C
'"
o
u C
~~ .~
~~ ~ii:
~~o~
25 ~ ~
:;: ~
~
0..
~
~
'" '"
C C
E 'E
E E
'" '"
010..
o 0
0.0..
C C
~ ~
~ ~
'" '"
~~
z z
o 0
j]
'" '"
"'"'
.~ .~
0: a:
55s
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
ci c3 o~
00'"
0'" N
~~'::i
c!,c!,c!,
o 0 0
o 0 0
c5 c3 o~
~~~
~~~
~h:-: VI
~ ~ QJ
~~[j
I"J~"""
.....,,~ 0 ~
~~~
qg ~
~qo
+1 ~~
~
5 0>
<DC
~.~ --
~.S ~
~ C'I E
~c'"
~~ ~
'" u '"
E~a
~ca~
g.J2~
0-
'"
",0..
~
,f
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
c!,
o
o
c:i
o
'"
~
~
>
~
N
'-:;i
o
o
o
~.
c
I
1
I
rg
1;;
~
;:
b
'0
t
-g
3
~
o
~
~ ~
-!? g. ~ @
~; ~ ~ ~ ~
uU E ~~ ~ ~
~ -g E ~ c: 2 .~ ~ ~
0.. ~ E ~ g ~ .~ :5 -g
o::tJcuo ~ ~:? ~ 5
~ee~ ~g ~~c:~ ~~
~~~~ ~ ~~ ggg~ ;.~
~~v8 ~ ~o ~ ~~~~ ~~
~.~~c:n uc..E~ ~ 0.. ~~Q)~ s.:E
_oro.~ ~EE~ oE xu_~ ~E
g~g~ 2~8~ E~~ ~~~~ ~8
~~~2~~CUNE~cu~~ro~~~~~ro~~cuQ)
~~~I~~~~~E~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~
'f;~~~~~~8~~~~I~~~~0~~O~~~
~~ NM~~,~ Nm~~ ~m~ N~~-N
"
I
'"
c
.2
3
c
..
E
..
A.
.E
~
5
o
~~u ~
00 ~o
~
'"
~~~
000
..
E
E
...
..
E
;::
..
..
o
u
o 0
00
00
c:i o~
o 0
o '"
~~
c!,c!,
00
00
0.0
o 0
o '"
~d
000
0000
o.qqo
0000'
eONv\'
'" -N
r:o.U""I.--N
g8
00.
.0
0",
~~
c!,~
qg
go
;;;t;.:2
c!,Jc!,c!,
0000
0000
ci c3 c:i u-\
<:) 0 Ln"""
LJ"'I co 01"'"':'
~~~,...
..
.!:I
In
'"
~[j
> ""
~ ~1n ~
~ ~g ~
0...,0'"
o 0 q' co
~~-=
tI~
"
+1
ct
...
Co
<II
...
C
o
u
:!..
at
<II
...
t!!
..
'^
C
o
i
..
C
<II
E
..
Q.
.E
. .
'" "''''
C " C
C 'E E "E 4.
g ~ ~ ~
VI
.. '5 S, ~cn
g- o '" o 0
... c. <= ~a.
:J <( E
II> "" " ~ " E
... C ~ ~ I
0
.. ~ !f.
z
'"
'"
~ ~ ]~
Z Z Z
C
~ '"
<=
e ~
0 '"
u C <= :;;-
~;gf! 0 0 0 0 ~~g
I:! 1 "I " C
.. ~~~~ :g I ~~~
C 0..
1:: c:::: v u'- '" '" ~S~
.. ~ggU ~ i E '" :g.~ ~
... E '"
~c....c.... ~ a-a:c:
fJ!. '"
~ '"
:;;- fJ!.
0
'"
u::
o (5
~~
'" '"
'" '"
.:=: .2:
0: a:
o
00
o 0
o~
o 0
00
.'"
~~
c!,J
00
o 0
o.c;
00
00
N::;I
;;;;~
~
~Qj
>
""~
;:5~
'c 0
~v;
'" 0
_ 0
10
~~
-
+I
c
o
.;::
:3
c
..
E
..
A.
.E
~
o
gS5~
~
'"
~
o
~
o
~~
00
(; 0
~~
'" '"
i!::'r13(C2;-
O~~O
~~~
000
..
E
E
...
..
E
;::
..
..
o
V
g
'=loo
000
000
~g'~
-:';';:~
gc!,c!,
""00
cio.C?.
s;.oo
~~:;:
+1
o
is
~
~
o
o
o
~
~
o
o
o
~
~
o
o
o
o
~
~
o
o
o
~.
~
c!-
o
o
d
o
o
~
--
~~
00
00
00
00
00
00
NO
:f9
o 0
o 0
o 0
c:ic5
00
00 0
~id
o 0 0
88.8.8.
0000
~q~~.
MO"I'<:t"N
..
N
;;;
~
>
;::;
':;;'
o
o
o
~
+I
~
13
o
~
'"
'"
C
o
~
o
o
o
~
+I
I I I I
00,00
0000
0000
ci ci ci o.
OOOU""l
~aa~
~~
'" '"
> >
~~
""N
~~
UO
"'0
~q
o~
~ +1
~ ~
~~ ~ if;
",~ON
~~~. ~
COON (1)
+1 ~ +1;-
+1 ~
~
0..
1!!
~ ~
~ .8 c
~ ~ 3 :~ c
;r. ~ ~ ." .~
'0 ~ ~~ c~ e E;
5 ~ ::I: >- g ~ g'~ c
~ oE 4J.?:'rtI ~a:~~ ~
E ~u ~o~ ~~~E EE
~ ~ -2 U B ~ ~ '" ~ E E g>~ "" E
~_rtl~ ~5C cC4Jt ro~ ~CO(1)
Q~a.c:::: 5t=;!!! Q.g~2i c::::~ :=a2/?.cr::
_~e~~4JNE4J~~~~u~~~~~c....~~~
~ .g ~ ~ 5: ~ E ~ -9. 5: g ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ '; 5: ~ ~ ~ l:g
~~~~~~~8~&2~~~~~&~~iz~~~
~ NI'T)~~~ N~~ N ~ N~ NI'T)~
00
1t
..
...
C
o
u
:!..
at
..
..
t!!
..
'^
C
o
'';:;
'"
~
.. t:
E ..
<II .-
- 0
Co"
ED.
..
4.
CfJ.
~
o
.-
4---J
ro
h
4---J
if)
:::;
--
.....-
-
4.
. '
;-"'"
.
.
.
IX.
Conclusions, Recommendations and Next Steps
The City Center Task Force has concluded that Master Plan Options A and B provide to viable
alternatives for consideration by Roseville Planning Commission and City Council. Both options
establish a new City Square as a new public gathering place and as a focus for a new Community
Center, Recreation Center and expanded City Government Center. Option A includes the
potential for introducing residential development that could help to offset public sector
investment in the City Center. Option B includes a new Public Safety Center as a potential
component of the City Center.
The Roseville City Center Task Force recommends that the Planning Commission and City
Council take these recommendations under review as they consider the potential of developing a
new City Center for the City of Roseville, A number of more detailed studies need to be
undertaken to confirm a particular direction.
The next steps include:
· Planning Commission and City Council approve Roseville City Center Master Plan and
Development Strategy.
· Public Works prepares program for new Public Warks Garage, location strategy and
relocation costs.
· Fire Department conducts a needs and location analysis to assess where Fire Station # 1
should be located. Prepare program and preliminary plans for new fire stationlPublic Safety
Center.
· Police Department refines program and prepares preliminary plans for new police
facilities/Public Safety Center
· Parks and Recreation Department prepares detailed program and preliminary plans for
Community Center, Recreation Center and Indoor Pool.
· Community Development Department prepares development plans for reuse of Arona Center
site,
· City seeks developer interest in residential development.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
20
C\..V)
D(
\\,\
Draft 1 I.l 0,99
~
Meeting Notes by Dennis Welsch
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING 41=15
Thursday, October 28, 1999
6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., City Hall
1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p,m, by Chairperson Keith Wietecki,
2. Present: Chair Keith Wietecki, Perrie Heitler, Thomas Johnson, Craig Klausing, Peggy Egli,
JosephSmith,Jan Vanderwall, Patricia Johnson, Scott Berg
City Council: Barb Mastel
Staff: Kim Way, Dennis Welsch
3. September 16, 1999 meeting notes were accepted as presented.
4. Phase 2 Models, Needs, Sizes
Kim Way explained Option Band C from the last meeting. He explained the discussions
with the Fire Chief regarding fire needs for Roseville, which should be undertaken in a
separate study.
Kim Way explained the next steps, phases and need for cost estimates. Draft reports and
recommendations could be prepared in the next month or two. All alternatives should be
documented as part of the report.
Concept A this evening is equivalent to Concept B from the September meeting. Public
Works must move at a very early stage.
The Community Center (27,000 s.t: foot print) and the structured parking (3 levels) would be
part of Phase 2 of Concept A. The parking structure has ground level local retail or services.
Phase 3 of Concept A adds a second parking structure (2 levels), and a recreation center
(27,000 s.t: foot print) and an enclosed pool (21,000 s.t: foot print). City hall and license
center do not change.
Phase 4 of Concept A adds a community center (27,000 sJ. foot print) and an expanded city
hall of 10,000 sJ.. The license bureau moves into the city hall expansion.
Phase 5 of Concept A adds the 48,000 sJ. foot print of housing in two buildings (110 to 120
units) along Lexington Avenue. An entrance to the housing would occur off of Lexington
Avenue.
City Hall expansion could happen at any time, earlier the better, especially to accommodate
the police expansion,
Page 1
,~O\
,yC{
\0
,
Peggy Egli mentioned the north/south alignment gives up winter solar exposure. Peggy Egli
suggested placement of structured ramp adjacent to the north side of the ice arena, moving
the community center to face the square, However, removing the centralized parking
reduces the opportunity for diffused parking and for first floor retail.
Placing the community center and recreation center adjacent to the pool and the ice arena
provides for easier walk-through access. Centralized parking supports more uses.
Peggy Egli asked for design refinement to add more parking space. The license bureau does
not need to be in city hall, could be placed in the shopping center or lower level of the
parking structure.
Jan Vanderwall suggested that the fire station be part ofthe parking area, across from the
central square, The fire staff is concerned about public access into the emergency fire areas,
Option C, now called "B", adds temporary parking in the City Square after Public Works has
been removed.
Phase 2 of"B" includes the community center (27,000 s.f.) and linkage to city hall. A link to
Central Park is also included.
Phase 3 of"B" includes a new 37,000 s,f. Public Safety Building.
Phase 4 of"B" includes construction of a three-level 450 space parking ramp and the City
Square.
Phase 5 of"B" includes the recreation center, the pool, and the structured two-level parking
adjacent to the ice arena and pool.
The Fire Chief expressed some concern with public access and truck circulation. Police
secured parking would be on the first level ofthe parking ramp,
These concepts provide a "framework" for future growth. Both concepts should remain.
Chair Wietecki suggested doing the Public Safety building first in order to free up space for
the park staff.
Peggy Egli mentioned in Plan "A" may be tight for parking. Would there be overflow to the
retail area to the north? Structured parking must be considered an integral part of each Plan
(A and B).
Chair Wietecki prepared an implementation chart with components of each concept, with
sizes and range of costs discussed for each, The time frame has not been completed to date.
It could be a ten-year or more program. The partners in each step are identified, along with
next decisions.
Task Force five-minute break.
Page 2
.'
.'
A discussion ensued regarding the draft development strategy.
Next Meeting.
Thursday, December 16, 1999 at 6:30 p.m.. Reports will be mailed out on December 10, 1999.
Chair Wietecki asked to consider what would happen if the Public Works could not be
moved.
Public Comments.
Barnie Bonniman asked if the site would change elevations. What would the height of the
buildings be? (2 to 3 stories). How come the TaskForce has reduced to nine?
John Cosiola, Brenner Avenue, asked for clarification on the cost of development for private
sector project. The Arona site could be redeveloped or remodeled for a community center.
Adioum.
The meeting was adjourned to December 16, 1999, at 6:30 p.m., in the City Council
Chambers of City Hall.
Q:\OTYCENf\TASK FORCE NOTES_lO_28_99.doc
Page 3
Minnesota
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
July 16, 1999
TO: CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
RE: CITY-WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NIGHT OUT - CENTRAL PARK
MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 1999
5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
The city-wide National Night Out celebration will be held Monday evening,
August 2,1999. The city police coordinator Gerry Ruettimann) for National
Night Out suggested that the Task Force have a table, handouts and models at
the "Night Out". He estimates 700 - 1000 residents will be present. Jerry
promises good weather and a prime location in the park (without swarms of
mosquitos ).
Task Force members who can spend time from 5:00 - 8:00 p.m. at the
"Night Out" should call Pat Morrison (651.490.2279) to sign up for a one-
hour (or more) time slot. Staff will see that a table, chairs and banner are
present and that handouts are available. Staffwill also mail notice to the
neighborhood surrounding City Center that this is a good opportunity to see
what is being studied and planned at this time.
Jerry Ruettimann (651.490.2262) recommended that each Task Force member
also go to their own neighborhood Night Out gathering during the week of
August 2nd. Call Jerry for details of where your neighborhood meeting will be
held.
cc: Kim Way, Ellerbe Becket (612.376.2026);)'erry Ruettimann, Night Out Coordinator; Jerry
Beck. Communications; Dennis Welsch, Community Development Director
(651.490.2232); Steve Sarkozy, City Manager;Bob Biersheid, Parks Director
Q:\CITYCENT\night-out080299.doc
fJt.f\
\a
1.\
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING =#=13
Thursday, July 15, 1999
6:30 p,m. - 9:00 p.m., City Hall
I. Call to Order 6:30 pm
ll. Review of July 1, 1999 Meeting Notes 6:35 pm
ID. Participation Plan (August-December) 6:40 pm
IV. Begin Phase 2 - Introduction of Uses (Kim Way) 6:45 pm
v. Refmement of Site Concepts (Kim Way) 7:45 pm
VI. Public Comments 8:35 pm
VII. Other Business 8:55pm
VIII. Adjourn 9:00 pm
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, August 19,1999 (6:30pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 070199; Participation Plan
Q:\CITYCEN1\Agenda (07.l5..99)doc
1\ ~qO\
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
PHASE 2 STUDY
DRAFT PARTICIPATION PLAN, JUL Y, 1999
1.0 Goal: Citizen participation in City Center Process
2.0 Objective:
2.1 Receive and provide broad based citizen communications; explain
the process to date and overcome misconceptions.
2.2 Inform the general public of Task Force progress
2.3 Seek constructive comment from all sectors of the community
2.4 Build broad base for decisions on City Center
2.5 Keep partners (schools, County, cable system, etc) informed
3.0 Methods (listed in order of use):
July-August
3.1 Monthly postcard to mailing list (nearly 1,000 currently)
o Map or sketch
o Actions or discussion summary from last meeting
o Agenda for upcoming meetings
3.2 Web site Home Page (www.cLroseville.mn.us)
iC] Task Force charge
iC] Task Force members
o Agenda and meeting notes from each meeting
o Maps of study area
o Kim's drawings and background reports by month
iC] Photos of model alternatives
iC] Email address to send comments
3.3 Article in each quarterly city newsletter ending with methods to
provide feedback including explaining the process of the Task
Force, frequently asked questions and answers.
1
3.4 "Hotline" telephone service
o 1 minute overview of activity during last month
o 3 minute question or comment space
3.5 National Night Out is planned for the first Tuesday of August. Task
Force members could each visit 2-3 neighborhoods (There are over
30 neighborhoods that observe the National Night Out.)
Aug ust-Septem ber-October
3.6 An article or an ad in the local weekly paper with details and
method to provide feedback
3.7 Open house discussions at City Hall and other sites throughout the
community. (Roseville City Open House is scheduled for early
October.) Task Force to act as presenter/hosts.
October - December
3.8 Discovery Workshops with Kim Way and organizations.
'3.9 Design Event: charette with Kim Way.
3.10 Displays with presentations (monthly) at the City Hall, service
clubs:'Activity Center, churches and senior centers with comment
cards and emails. Task Force members to volunteer to make the
presentations.
3.11 Distribute a one-page questionnaire or comment card to be
answered by email, phone hot line, letter, or call. Or, use stuffer in
local paper delivery (usually poor response) and respond/answer
, after the conclusion of each phase.
3.12 Cable system broadcasts of meetings (continuously) and 15
minute "spot light" programs with Kim and a Task Force member
discussing one topic with hot line phone number for comments.
3.13 KTIS radio call-in show
Q:\CITYCENT\participation plan,doc
2
Channel 4000 - Hometown - Burnsville opens new teen center
CIIIU ~~~;!.~.."'{~"~,,-6\I__ c~o
--'-" '-'- - ~
.:=-'---'--:..:=:- , 'I Burnsvll:e
nc\\'spaI'C."S ' --
":-<-<6d.:~"'-"
,~~,'
"~?~"-
. 7;iiUhi~:~1[;tiq~
'eontaCtai' ',"
Burnsville opens new teen center
By James Craven
Sun Newspapers
(Published: Tuesday, July 13, 1999)
Grand opening highlights
The grand opening of The Garage is scheduled to
start at 1 p.m. on Saturday, July 17. The following is
a partial list of musical events:
I p.m. - Kevin Thomas, acoustic rock and blues.
2 p.m. - Dean Buetler. folk rock.
3 p.m. - Andie Cortes, classical guitar.
4 p.m. - Brenda DeJurdin & Thomas Tremblay, new
americana mix with folk and alternative.
7 - II p.m. - The Cooders and Mindless Conception.
plus two more bands.
For 15-year-old Nate Fritz and 14-year-old Stephen
Fraenkel finding a place to be is as easy as going to
the garage.
That is if it's the "Garage" in Burnsville.
Recently, both Nate and Stephen showed up at the
new teen facility to volunteer their time to help.
"It's a good place to be and once word gets out I think
it will be real popular," said Stephen, his voice rising
over the sound ofOzzie Osborne's "Ironman" on the
stereo. "I like it here."
In the works for more than two years, the Garage is
the newest teen hangout to open in the city -- with a
difference.
The difference being the Garage is officially
sanctioned as a place where teens can go to have fun,
~{'f
,,~,'f.'':''~
;".t ,...-....
L~,.a.I
,rr
iUown
aenter
IOther Papers: Jtf
;t. '6'~fII
,~':-\.<> .,
Would you like an
e-mail when the
Sun Current
comes online? Just
give us your
address:
Page I of3
utO\
~
0("1""""'1...... . 1 ....n.0 t =-,-O""QC 1............1 ..., r, = T\('\
Channel 4000 - Hometown - Burnsville opens new teen center
Page 2 of 3
meet friends, and be safe.
Although the Garage has been open for business since
July 6, its official opening is scheduled for Saturday.
July 17.
Named after its location, the teen center is in the
city's former maintenance center in Civic Center
Park, directly across from City Hall.
Costing more than a quarter of a million dollars to set
up, the Garage is a partnership between the city, area
businesses, parents, and organizations that have
supplied grants for the project, said Eric BillieC the
Garage's coordinator.
"It's been slow getting started," said Billiet. "Kids are
coming in now in small groups, staying a little while.
checking the place out, and then leaving.
"I think they're still deciding if we're a good place to
be," he said.
The Garage has a lot to offer teens looking for a place
to go. The area has been completely remodeled into
separate activity areas. A large game room features
two pool tables, ping-pong, Foosball, and a wide
variety of pinball and other electronic games. In the
Garage's TV lounge, teens can watch their favorite
episode of "Seinfeld" or "Beavis & Butthead" on a
32-inch television donated by Sears and relax on a
hodgepodge of sofas and easy chairs. For the more
studious, there is a computer center with two
computers, desks, and a large goldfish to keep an eye
on things.
The reception area has the look of an outdoor bistro
with the names, and in some cases, hand prints, of
supporters scrawled across them.
Also obvious are the posted notes on the rules at the
Garage that urge visitors to: respect yourself, staff
and peers; that there is zero tolerance for drugs,
smoking, alcohol, or other illegal activities, as well as
signs of gang affiliation; no loitering; and that visitors
should be responsible for personal valuables.
"We have rules because we want everyone who
comes to the Garage to be comfortable," said Billiet.
Although the first phase of building the Garage is
done, he has hopes that expansion will continue. He
would like to see the entire maintenance garage
complex made into a youth center with space for
teams, a theater complex for budding actors, and
1...._, "..,,,~., ..'~,'~ ~ ,~, 1~""'~'''''-'11'';t,.lc",..,I"rt;('Ic>c:/h"I,..,p",/clmn''r1f'\\'-QQn71 ~_112Qn4-"r;~2~r;,html 7 '1 ,qq
--
Channel 4000 - Hometown - Burnsville opens new teen center
Page 3 of 3
other activities,
"Maybe even a dome over the top for a gymnasium --
but that's a long way in the future," he said.
Currently, The Garage is open Monday through
Thursday from 3 to 9 p.m. and Friday and Saturday
from 3 to 6:30 p.m.
Friday nights from 8 to 10:30 are reserved for junior
high students and Saturdays from 8 to 11 :30 p.m are
for senior high students.
"We felt there had to be a time \vhen we could
address both the older and younger crowd with
activities planned for their age group." BiUiet said.
"Seventh-graders and 12th-graders have different
ideas of what's fun."
Entrance to The Garage will be by a $1 daily
admission charge, which is waived for youth who
purchase a yearly membership for $30. A $5 discount
is available for those buying a yearly pass before July
17.
~~l~ home help search e-mail Lb.s
Sun Newspapers ~ 1999, Main Office: (612) 829-0797
'..-4-.....
"
",'~'" ~~." :~"...,,,~,,,...,;t,./<:l1Y' :,.,,-tir1e><:.'h""Y't"':!<:1]nh'..ne\\'-GG071 ~-112q04-5h8286,html
7; 1 5 !C)C)
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING #11
Theme of Meeting:
Complete Work on Phase 1 Boundary and Concept Work
I.
Call to Order
6:30 pm
II.
Review of May 20, 1999 Meeting Notes
6:35 pm
Action Requested: Review meeting noted and comments from past meeting.
Action Requested: Thank Richard Bates for his contributions to the Task Force
Phase 1 work and wish him well on new job responsibilities which take him out of
town. (Mr. Bates has determined he can no longer take the time to serve through
Phase 2.)
III. Clarification on Planning District Boundary
(plan. Comm. Hearing still scheduled for July 14, 1999)
6:45 pm
Action Requested: Determine a boundary for the planning area (including
comments from meetings in Mays from Pat Johnson, and from Peggy Egli). The
boundary will complete the Phase I "boundary and area" study. This boundary
can then be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their meeting on July 14,
1999, along with Kim Way's conceptual uses plan which provides more detail
about where, within the planning area, the various land uses fit best
Action Requested: Through Dennis Welsch, the Task Force should report on this
activity to the Planning Commission and Council, seek their direction, but not
request further hearings until more detail is completed on the "Detailed City
Center Concepts" portion of the study which is Phase 2
IV. Interest Group DiscussionslPublic Comment
6:55 pm
Action Requested: Consolidate the Phase 1 comments received at the public
meetings and ask if there are other comments not covered that should be
included in this report.
Action Requested: Determine how residents (city-wide) will continue to have
public input into the process during Phase 2 "Detailed City Center Concepts"
c 1iJ ~,~
~~~
Action Requested: Determine how residents (the affected neighborhood) will
continue to have public input during Phase 2, especially as it relates to their
neighborhood. (In addition to the public meetings, an Ad Hoc committee of
neighborhood residents may be the most effective method.)
v.
Refinement of Site Concepts (Kim Way)
7:15 pm
Action Reauested: Determine a more specific conceptual uses plan which
provides more detail about where, within the planning area, the various City
Center uses fit best. Use this as the second part of the Phase 1 report for the
Planning Commission and City Council.
VI. Other Items
8:50 pm
Action Requested~ Establish a starting date for Phase 2, the "Detailed City Center
Design Concepts". It is likely that Phase 2 work may take up to 9 months. If the
work and monthly meetings begin in July, 1999, the completion would be in
Februaty or March, 1999.
VII. Adjourn
9:00 pm
Next Planning Commission Meeting: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, July 15 1999 (6:30 pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 05.20.99; District Description; One-on-One Interview Summaries
Q:\CITYCEN1\A.ctionAgenda- {06,17..99),doc
-
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Department Approval:
DATE: 07/14/99
ITEM NO: '5"q,
Agenda Section:
CONSENT
Withdrawal of City Center Task Force C<;>mprehensive Plan
District Boundary and District Definition
City Manager Approval:
Item Description:
1.0 REQUESTED ACTION
At the July I, 1999 City Center Task Force Meeting, the Task Force agreed to withdraw
their City Center District proposal (as being premature and without enough detail) and
request the Planning Commission to approve the withdrawal.
2.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
By motion, accept and approve the request by the City Center Task Force to formally
withdraw their request for the City Center District proposal (as being premature and
without enough detail).
Q:IComDevICityCenterIPF3119IPCA(671499),doc
\~ C\~
/).\
July 12, 1999
MinMSota Real Estate]oul7I/Jl
Page 5
~
The city of
Maple Grove
will soon
shape up
NORTHWEST PLANS
NEW FITNESS CLUB
'The city of Maple Grove is about to '
get its first health club, , ,
Last month, the city ap~roved North:.
west ({ac uet Swim and ealth Club's
aDS to deve 0 a two- e . .
~are oat aCI ftiul at WI e aced
to the City s I J H. square toot cQrnmu-
~ center. located east of the WeaY.ef
Lakelroad/Interstate 94 interchange,
The club, which will be Northwest's
II th Twin cities location. will operate as
its own entity but share some ameniries
with the community center.
o, a Ie Grove is a tremendous mar-
ket:' says Jerry oyee. art west s
regional manager. adding that he expectF
the new club to draw members from
throughout Maple Grove as weB as
neighboring suburbs, including Cham-
plin and Plymouth,
The city plans 10 sell Northwest about
5,5 acres of land for the development.
Club owners also will have an option on
an additional three acres for future
expansion. says AI Madsen, Maple
Grove city administrator. Neither North-
west nor city officials wiJJ disdose a
potential sale price for the land.
"T hey're in the final
stages of financing and
they're out for pricing
with contractors. "
- Teny Just
director of parks and recreaJWn
city of Maple Grove
Noyce says a cost estimate for the club,
is not yet available as Northwest is still
running the numbers. Northwest is work-
ing with lender J,P, Morgan,
'"They're in the final stages of fInanc.
ing and they're out for pricing with con~
tractors,'" says Terry Just, Maple Grove
director of parks and recreation.
Typically, Northwest clubs average
about 150,000 square feet ahd feature full.
service exercise equipment, swimming
pools and sports faciJities. However, the
Maple Grove club will be significantly
smaller and will not contain tennislraajuet.
ball courts or an indoor pool, The club will
share the community center's indoor pool,
whiJe the Northwest facility will feature an
outdoor pool that will be available 10 user.;
of the community center,
'This will be a new design:' Noyce says,
adding that plans call for a full fitness cen.
ter with an indoor running track imd aero-
bic studio, a pro shop, snack bar and
locker rooms with full.length loclrer1!.
The outdoor pool is scbeduled to open
in June 2000 and the club is expected to
REPORTS
open in September 2000,
P1ans for the Northwest facility in Maple
Grove were first discussed in 1996, but the
club was unable to line up the financing
(MREJ, 9'16-96). At that time, the propos'
al called for a 170,000 10 180,000 square
foot facility to be developed on 15 acres,
wlUch would bave been the chain's largest
club,
The club owners at the time, Harvey
Ratner and Marvin Wolfenson, were fros,
!rated that their lenders would not advance
new money for expansion, They ended up
Selling the chain of clubs in March 1997 to
Denver,based Club Sports International,
which also ~wns Aagship Athletic Club in
Eden Prairie,
As for future expansion. Noyce says
there is nothing definite, but '"we're look.
ing at possibly expanding in the Twin
Cities market." He will not disclose possi-
ble locations,
In 1996, the club also bad plans 10 deve!,
op a facilily in OakdaIe, but once again the
lack of fmancing put a halt 10 that project.
Noyce says Dakdale is still a possibility,
but he will not comment further, .Li: wolj'
" Maple Grove is a
tremendous market. "
-Jeny Noyce
regioTllll 71U1T11lgtT
Northwest Racquet Swim
and Health Club
"."'.-..
. ."~ ~. ,
.. . _ __.._ __ _.u_,.~__....'~. ..__.__"'.....__"..p~.;.,._....~_~.___._,,_ _. ~.. _,., _ _ h_..__.~____.. ...__. . ___ __'_ _ _ _. _ _ __.. _ o. _ . _ _._ '_.' . . .
'.~1 ~:':"._-:''''~N~__~~..l
~' ,. ;;"~.~~1>'.~~:.~:I~~~~~.;:~::~:~=~:~:~=~:=.~!q~t~~~~~':~~~~:f~3q~~~~.l:}'..~~~7,,~:,_~~~;~,~--,:'1.
d\
'G-' ()\
1'\
Channel 4000 - Hometown - Task force unveils community center designs
Pagc lof3
.. '.. I
\in~
community
eduCation
, . ., .
, calend.
'...."/' .,
~pJ".OIt
~Ic.etv
seniors ..
obituaries
~."'.iU.'."..'
bri8fs
fNf!Iftts/scores
weather" :
ai'chiVe
contact us
Task force unveils community
center designs
By Doug Terfehr
Sun Newspapers
(Published: Tuesday, June 29, \999) IOther Pa pers: ~
With an estimated $9.5 million sticker price,
members of the Multi-Purpose Community Center
task force felt the publicly funded facility might be a
tough sell in Richfield.
After seeing the concept plans unveilep Thursday,
June 24, some task force members are now convinced
the proposed community center would pass in a
November referendum,
The preliminary designs were meant to give the task
force a vision of what a new community center might
look like.
If a $9.5 million facility were built, it would cost the
owner of a $100,000 house approximately $4 to $6 a
month in additional taxes, task force Chairman Rick
Jabs said.
If the City Council agrees to put the measure on the
ballot, Richfield residents would vote in November to
decide the facility's fate.
The task force is considering a plan to build the
facility on Veterans Memorial Park land south of the
water plant along Portland Avenue,
The site was once a grove of trees which city crews
cut down in 1997 to make way for city maintenance
facility. Resident uproar over the tree-cutting caused
city officials to abandon the site as an option for the
Public Works facility.
Would you like an
e-mail when the
Sun Current
comes online? Just
gIve us your
address:
!
. $~~R~:i:b~h': I
http://www.wcco.com/comm uni ty 1 sun! articles/ri/new 1 S Llnri 11 ew- 99062 9-1 03259- 24 9994. html
7/5/99
Channel 4000 - Hometown - Task force unveils community center designs
While the site is the group's first choice, task force
members said they were uncertain if it would be
available for a community center project.
"It's an amazing structure," Jabs said. "Once you
know what's all in there, you're just shocked. It's
incredible. It would offer so many new recreational
opportunities in Richfield.
"I think once people see what we saw, it's got a pretty
good chance of being approved."
The preliminary design, which was unveiled during
last week's meeting at the water plant, has two levels.
The first floor would include most of the amenities. A
recreational pool complete with water slides and a
gymnasium with two full-length basketball courts
would take up the largest space. Eight meeting rooms
would divide the pool from a banquet hall. The
dimensions of each room were not yet determined.
To the north of the gymnasium, 'offices, a teen center,
a youth game room and a kid's play area are proposed.
An aerobic room and locker rooms would separate
the pool from the gymnasiurp.
The upper floor would include a running track,
weight room and waiting area.
Mark Anderson, project manager for SEH Inc. -- the
architectural firm that prepared the designs -- offered
details of the exterior design of the building for the
task force.
The structure would be close to 30 feet high at its
peak but the elevation would vary, Anderson said.
Two pool decks with canopies and an outdoor plaza
by the banquet hall would jut out from the main
building.
The task force and architects spent a large portion of
the meeting discussing the color of the building.
Anderson proposed an earthy color for most of the
building with the aqua-colored trim. Some task force
members thought it might be better to incorporate the
city colors of purple and blue into the design.
Anderson said he would explore both ideas.
http://www.wcco.com/community/sun/articles/ri/new/sunrinew-990629-1 03259- 249994 ,html
Page 2 of 3
7/5/99
Channel 4000 - Hometown - Task force unveils community center designs
"We're moving along but we haven't approved the
design yet," Jabs said. "We've got two and a half
months to prove to residents how important of a
facility this would be to the city."
If constructed, the center would mean the end of the
35-year-old outdoor Richfield pool and recreation
facility. Likewise, the current Community Center,
7000 Nicollet Ave., would no longer be used, Jabs
said. If not replaced, both facilities require
renovations which could cost upwards of $2 million
for the pool and $500,000 for the community center.
"Some people are against shutting down the outdoor
pool but once they see what kind of an upgrade this --
the Multi-Purpose Community Center n is, they won't
miss the old pool as much," Jabs said.
The task force will present the designs to the
Richfield City Council at its July 6 meeting
c.... 'b
_.",,!\m!! home help search e-mail 1. .s
UI:~p..;Io4""""
Sun Newspapers <<J 1999. Main Office: (612) 829-0797
http://www.wcco.com/community/sunlarticles/ri/new/sunrinew-99062 9-103259- 249994,html
Page 3 of3
7/5/99
~
Meeting Notes by Dennis Welsch
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING =11=12
Thursday, July 1, 1999
6::)0 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., City Hall
1. Call to Order - The meeting was called to order at6:30 pm by Chairperson Keith Wietecki,
2. Present: Scott Berg, Tom Johnson, Ann Hermes, Joseph Smith, Pat Johnson, Chair Keith
Wietecki, Craig Klausing, Perrie Heitler, Jan Vanderwall
Staff. Kim Way, Dennis Welsch .
3. Meeting Notes: The May 20m meeting notes were reviewed.
4. Boundary Discussion: Dennis Welsch presented a summary of comments from Peggy Egli,
Don Anderson, Pat Johnson.
Pat Johnson asked that the Parkview Condos and the Media One site be included in the
planning area. A letter could be sent explaining the differences.
Craig Klausing described the differences between a Comprehensive Plan Planning District
amendment and a long term planning area He suggested focusing on the areas where
active development could occur with a look at long term planning later.
Joseph Smith explained that the size of the existing City Center (small) has created
confusion and the conclusion by the public that more land would be needed and acquired.
Scott Berg noted that the communications have been misconstrued; should remain
consistent with May 20 discussion of boundary. If a letter was sent, it could confuse future
decisions.
Perrie Heitler agreed regarding communications, especially concerning condos. Howard
Johnson should remain in the planning area because it could be enhanced - a benefit to the
neighborhood
Jan Vanderwall suggested that in the future, the Task Force should discuss a planning area
and a specific work area within it.
Craig Klausing asked what the Planning Commission would be asked to do with the original
proposal. !fto table, there was no real concern because additional planning must take place.
Kim Way suggested the Task Force define "what it is" before going back to the Planning
Commission.
Page 1 of 4
\'~C\
"
Joseph Smith asked that Hamline Shopping Center be part of the process and consideration.
This could be a collaborative project with private sector and is within a five-minute walk.
Scott Berg noted the City Center Task Force (CcrF) recommended geographic continuity -
be in one site; siting the problem with the library.
Pat Johnson noted the CCTF was originally concerned about other development that might
occur.
Chair Wietecki summarized: CCTF was premature in going to the Planning Commission;
suggested that the CcrF withdraw the request from the Planning Commission and
continue to plan within the current boundary of the CcrF - which has been shrunk down
to a working plan area. At a later date when more details will be available, the CcrF could
again present a detailed phase 2 report including economics to the Planning Commission.
Craig Klausing agreed that the Comprehensive Plan Planning District boundary request
should be withdrawn, but the process should be kept moving forward.
Chair Wietecki noted the CCTF will develop a list of options for the Planning Commission
and the City Council.
Jan Vanderwall asked that the public provide an answer to "what are the important things
that should be placed on this site?"
Chair Wietecki suggested public comment works best when the public can be shown
options, but more public input is needed.
Kim Way suggested using the 5 or 10 minute walking distance as the planning area.
Kim Way described the City Square concept.
Scott Berg noted that options are needed and can be more specific "within the purple box"
(existing city complex). He asked that the boundary be described to include planning areas
adjacent to the "purple box".
Consensus: Withdraw request at 7/14/99 Planning Commission meeting at this time
and note that Howard Johnson Park (or any Park) is not going to be used for City
Center structures.
Kim Way noted that the CCTF cannot plan in a "acuwn; the Task Force must look at
alternatives. He reviewed the City Square concept and parking needs. He also described
concept alternatives called "Main Street" and "Parkway",
Consensus: The City Square is the concept the CcrF will examine in more detail in
Phase 2. It is the Roseville meeting "place" with a mixed-use component.
Pat Johnson noted that the concept is a campus with green space,
Page 2 of 4
Ann Hermes asked that the public comment first, then the issues should be prioritized with
police and fire.
5. Phase 2: Discussion
Kim Way explained (with a hand out) the Phase 2 process and a third phase with costs,
implementation strategy and more detailed picture of the proposal The formal
recommendation to the City Council would occur in year 2000.
Scott Berg suggested Phase 2 should provide alternatives for public comment. Jan
Vanderwall noted that the process will (may) determine the number of alternatives.
Chair Wietecki noted that 'a vision without a budget is hallucination'.
Consensus: The CCTF agreed Kim Way's generalized outline of Phase 2 activities
shown on the monthly schedule. Kim Way will expand upon the products/outcomes
expected each month. A public input process will be added at the end of each phase.
6. Public Input Process
There is a need for more general public comment in addition to the special interest
comment. A representative sample should be done. The CCTF should include a
communication tool to the public - ways of giving information and asking for comment
Could there be communication by newsletter, newspaper, cable and a "hot line" phone
recording?
Chair Wietecki asked that the program for the site be prepared and be available for
comment and prioritized. Define what the needs are.
Pat Johnson asked for a press release to the local newsletter after each meeting; email and
the internet web site are also available.
Craig Klausing asked that public input be in depth and provide give and take. Jan
Vanderwall asked that "mini-reports" come out in graphic and written form after each
phase.
Kim Way suggested a series of public input sessions with "open houses" after August 1999
meeting to discuss work to date. Is there a need for a broader public discussion of the
issues? Could the next meeting be an "open house" with boards and drawings?
Chair Wietecki asked for a concrete summary of what has been completed to date be part of
the "open house". Scott Berg asked for a "likes/dislikes" questionnaire at the open house.
Jan Vanderwall asked if the proposals could be present around the community.
Page 3 of 4
Chair Wietecki asked Dennis Welsch to return with a plan for public input process.
7. Public Comment:
Dick Houck said people misunderstood when the CCTF took an aggressive position with the
Planning Cornmission. The CCTF charge includes a report to the Council and the residents.
The project recommendation should include costs that the Council can ask for approvaJ in a
referendum. The phase 2 planning process is the right way to go,
A general discussion of the Planning Commission report process ensued, '
Carla Miller, Avon Street, asked for clarification regarding Howard Johnson Park and the
VFW. She explained the confusion over the issues,
Wendell Brown, Griggs Street, challenged the CCfF to keep the boundaries as shown on the
agenda card - do not confine the site, The Howard Johnson Park could use more
improvements including a picnic shelter, Establish priorities, Where can the City move the
Public Works Department?
Bill Lansky, Dellwood Street, expressed concern about the use of parks for City Center.
Divert traffic to Lexington and County Road C. Why must the city do anything? The people
who attend meetings are the residents who care. Try ,to keep neighborhoods quiet, peaceful
and green. Agun range would be desirable. One plan alternative could be to do nothing.
John Kysylyczyn, Victoria Street, expressed concern for costs; thanked the CCTF for time
and effort. The Focus is the newspaper for the City. He described that parkland on
Fernwood and Roselawn, and at Lexington and B where buildings may be or are
constructed. The mistrust issue relates to past projects such as the Oval and the Council.
Scott Berg noted the CCTF should be moving aggressively forward,
A resident said the CCfF planning process should include a traffic congestion study. The
Planning Commission suggested more input. She recommended a city center not all in one
area to reduce congestion.
8. Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p,m.
Q:\CITYCENf\T ASK FORCE NOTES_07.01,99.doc
Page 4 of 4
-- -----
~c.& \'tq
tJ~
MEMO:
TO:
City Center Task Force
, DOnAnderS~ ~
FROM:
DATE:
July 1, 1999
SUBJECT:
Modification of City Center Boundaries
I am sorry that I won't be present to state my concerns on modifying the' western boundary of the City
Center study area in person. However, I have other commitments for this date that were made before the
switch in dates caused by the cancellation of our regularly scheduled meeting on June 17th.
As I reflect on the boundaries that we modified at our May 20th meeting and on the comments we
received at that meeting ITom residents regarding Howard Johnson Park, I feel that we should move the
west boundary to the west side of the Skating Center (Oval) site.
While we could argue that retaining the present west boundary is necessary for, possible, future City
Center needs, we have made similar arguments for including the Owasso school property and the mobile
home area in these boundaries. Both of the later boundaries were modified at the May
meeting and are no longer included in the City Center study area.
Removing Howard Johnson Park from the study area would be consistent with the above decision, but
more importantly, would maintain the provisions of the Park and Recreation System Plan which calls for
one neighborhood park in each planning district. Howard Johnson is the neighborhood park for this
planning district. Recent acquisitions of park land, i.e. Pioneer Park and Owasso Hills, completes this
system of neighborhood parks for the city. Elimination of Howard Johnson as a neighborhood park
would require the acquisition to additional land as a replacement. Both Vista 2000 and the Parks
Inrrastructure Report also endorse the concept of neighborhood parks in each planning district.
Therefore I would recommend that the western boundary of the City Center study area be moved to the
western boundary of the Skating Center (Oval) site. This would be consistent with overall park planning
and should relieve the neighbors concerns.
Thanks for your consideration.
. ~_._....;-
-..:-";.-
\/~~
i'
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING #11
Thursday, July 1, 1999
6:30 p.m, - 9:00 p,m., City Hall
I. Call to Order 6:30 pm
II. Review of May 20,1999 Meeting Notes 6:35 pm
III. Clarification on Planning District Boundary
(plan. Comm. Hearing still scheduled for July 14, 1999) 6:45 pm
IV. Interest Group DiscussionslPublic Comment 6:55 pm
v. Refmement of Site Concepts (Kim Way) 7:15 pm
VI. Other Items 8:50 pm
VII. Adjourn 9:00 pm
Next Planning Commission Meeting:
Wednesday, July 14,1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, July 15,1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Council Meeting:
Monday, July 12,19,26,1999 (6:30 pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 05.20.99; District Description; One-on-One Interview Summaries
Q:\CITYCEN1\Agenda (07,0 I ..99),doc
"
\'~O\
1-
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING #11
Theme of Meeting:
Complete Work on Phase 1 Boundary and Concept Work
I.
Call to Order
6:30 pm
II.
Review of May 20, 1999 Meeting Notes
6:35 pm
Action ReQuested: Review meeting noted and comments from past meeting.
Action Requested: Thank Richard Bates for his contributions to the Task Force
Phase 1 work and wish him well on new job responsibilities which take him out of
town. (Mr. Bates has determined he can no longer take the time to serve through
Phase 2.)
III. Clarification on Planning District Boundary
(Plan. Comm. Hearing still scheduled for July 14, 1999)
6:45 pm
Action Requested: Determine a boundary for the planning area (including
comments from meetings in May, from Pat Johnson, and from Peggy Egli). The
boundary will complete the Phase I "boundary and area" study. This boundary
can then be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their meeting on July 14,
1999, along with Kim Way's conceptual uses plan which provides more detail
about where, within the planning area, the various land uses fit best.
Action Requested: Through Dennis Welsch, the Task Force should report on this
activity to the Planning Commission and Council, seek their direction, but not
request further hearings until more detail is completed on the "Detailed City
Center Concepts" portion of the study which is Phase 2
IV. Interest Group DiscussionslPublic Comment
6:55 pm
Action Requested: Consolidate the Phase 1 comments received at the public
meetings and ask if there are other comments not covered that should be
included in this report
Action Requested: Determine how residents (city-wide) will continue to have
public input into the process during Phase 2 "Detailed City Center Concepts"
Action Requested: Determine how residents (the affected neighborhood) will
continue to have public input during Phase 2, especially as it relates to their
neighborhood. (In addition to the public meetings, an Ad Hoc committee of
neighborhood residents may be the most effective method.)
v.
Refinement of Site Concepts (Kim Way)
7:15 pm
Action Requested: Determine a more specific conceptual uses plan which
provides more detail about where, within the planning area, the various City
Center uses fit best. Use this as the second part of the Phase 1 report for the
Planning Commission and City Council.
VI. Other Items
8:50 pm
Action Requested: Establish a starting date for Phase 2, the "Detailed City Center
Design Concepts". It is likely that Phase 2 work may take up to 9 months. If the
work and monthly meetings begin in July, 1999, the completion would be in
February or March, 1999.
VII. Adjourn
9:00 pm
Next Planning Commission Meeting: Wednesday, July 14,1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, July 151999 (6:30 pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 05.20.99; District Description; One-an-One Interview Summaries
Q:\CITYCEN1IActionAgenda- (06,17..99),doc
-
City Center Task Force
Meeting =IF 10 Notes
May 20. 1999
1. Call to Order: Chair Keith Wietecki called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall,
2. Present: Chair Keith Wietecki, Vice Chair Lois Sinn Lindquist, Don Anderson,
Jan Vanderwall, Perrie Heitler, Peggy Egli, Richard Bates, Ann Hermes
Staff: Kim Way, Dennis Welsch
3. April 15 meeting notes reviewed.
4. Report on Planning Commission input of the May 14,1999 meeting. Dennis
Welsch presented an overview of the comments received at the Planning
Commission meeting, The following comments were described:
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS
FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12.1999
GENERAL SUBJECT
# OF COMMENTS
1)
Mobile Home Park
Will it be purchased; future use, transit/higher density housing
Why transit?
6
3
2)
Traffic Concerns
Corner Lexington & Co. Rd C
3
3)
4)
Decline in property value
2
Parks
Future of Howard Johnson & why not include Central Park
3
5)
Costs
Short and/or long term
5
6)
Process
Zoning/Comp PlanrTiming (need more time & info)/site size
14
Page 1 of 5
Task Force make-up/participationlinform city-wide area
3
7)
Opposed (no other expression other than "opposed")
2
Chair Wietecki suggested the boundary of the planning district be changed
based on comments from the Planning Commission, He suggested excluding
the mobile home park and all the area east of Oxford Street.
Jan Vanderwall asked for details of the Burlington Northern rail abandonment.
Chair Wietecki explained the route west of Roseville that would be abandoned
in 1999, Jan Vanderwall asked if the rail line was a "use" that should be included
at this time.
Don Anderson explained that transit lines are not viable in Roseville, but rather
should be used as an addition to the pathway system.
Motion: Don Anderson moved, seconded by Lois Sinn Lindquist to amend
the boundary of the City Center Planning District to eliminate the mobile
home park and the land east of Oxford Street.
Lois Sinn Lindquist stated the Task Force was attempting to stay broad -
create an outer limit - to allow for more flexibility,
Jan Vanderwall noted that not much commercial development is planned
within the City Center District. A general discussion of business zoning ensued.
Tom Johnson asked if the railroad right-of-way would be retained in the district
(yes ).
Peggy Egli asked why Howard Johnson was included, but Central Park was not
included. (The north edge and corner access of Central Park were included).
She said the reason to include the parks was not clear. Howard Johnson Park
was to be connected to the City Center. The impacts of indoor vs outdoor parks
must be discussed and understood.
Ann Hermes asked if the mobile home park tenants have any protection from
new uses proposed by new owners of the nine acres. (There is no protection of
the mobile home area, currently guided for residential, while the zoning is B-3
business use).
Motion carred 8-1(Hermes)
Dennis Welsch explained the reasons for the City Center Plan based on Vista
2000, the Comprehensive Plans of 1994 and 1998, the Infrastructure Committee
recommendations of 1998 and the Resident Satisfaction Survey of May, 1998.
Page 2 of 5
----, -----------
-
.
5. Public Comments:
Delores Stewart, Park View Condominiums, explained that there was confusion
over the planning process, the mailings, and the language in the notices.
Roseville should be a homey area with convenience, family area.
Bill Lanski, Dellwood Avenue, wants small town atmosphere and keep Howard
Johnson Park as a small play area. The City does not need an indoor facility or
the added parking. He prefers the open area; not more buildings and open
space. Use the Central Park ball fields as a building site. Include walkways and
upgrade the improvements already in the park.
Mike Hermes, 2796 Galtier, noted that Roseville's identity has not changed.
Unkept yards and lawns keeps property values down. A new building will
increase property values,
Eugene Bohnamen, Lexington Avenue, expressed concern about his house and
the impact on it. He explained that his property would be placed in limbo with
a new City Center District. There is noise and traffic from Lexington Avenue
already. Put the City Center in Centre Pointe. Leave me/my property alone.
Joe Matchinowski, 2690 Oxford, stated that the City Center District should only
be on land not already used. Use Central Park ball fields for building. Use empty
lots on Woodhill. Use land that belongs to Roseville,
AI Sands, 2612 AIdine N, said that Central Park should be included. Why wasn't
it included. Why was land north of Wood hill included (VFW, Veterans Park,
Shopping Strip)? Why look out 40 years; why not 5 to 10 years? Demonstrate
the need for new land before buying additional property, Take out land north of
Woodhill. Consider the Arona site.
George Warner, Huron Street, noted there was no connection between City
Center and Howard Johnson, which should be left as is. In the City Center
District, the coordination and delivery of city/government services is the only
important use, There is too much traffic, disperse the uses. Keep the library
where it is. Do not cramp the site with too much recreation. Use Lexington and
B site as a recreation site,
Pat Sajak, Parkview Terrace, said she prefers open space. Central Park does
connect neighborhoods and should be protected as open space.
Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn, supports all development. Roseville belongs to all
people, Does the plan represent the needs of all of Roseville? He opposes
spending public money without a referendum. When the plan is complete, the
Task Force must come to the people with a plan for approval (referendum). The
Oval is an example of a project without a referendum. This was a "railroad job",
Page 3 of 5
Joan Jacobson, Oxford Street, said the parks should be left as is. Roseville should
be quiet. Go to the shopping centers and place the Center there.
Shelly Lonski, Dellwood Avenue, asked if the Fire Station was too small for
current equipment. Regarding the phone survey, when and where was it done.
Where would parking be accommodated for new uses? Parking and traffic are
too much for the area and Howard Johnson should remain open space. How can
parks be kept as open space? Can smaller areas be designated for uses, such as
license bureau? Could the improvements be in different parts of Roseville?
(Spread throughout the City).
John Kysylyczyn, 3083 North Victoria, stated that excessively high taxes are also
detrimental. He expressed concern about the information sent to residents. He
was concerned with the quality of and process for gathering public comment,
Ann Berry, 1059Woodhill Drive, asked if there was a rush to complete the
project? No priorities have been established, There is a huge waste of central
space for public works. Why are some parks included, other not included,
Where would the garage go? Will there be focus groups? Why is no one from
the Task Force from the neighborhood? There is plenty of retail in the
neighborhood that is empty, Why more? Why is there reference to religion and
"public housing"? The pathways concept is more than 20 years old and it is not
opposed.
Five minute break.
AI Kehr, 988 County Road D, provided historical background on need for
planners and architects. The 40-year planning horizon is too large. He opposed
the Oval; it does not pay for itself. There is only a need for one downtown -
Rosedale. There is no need for "stone corners". The City needs professional
planners like John Shardlow and Howard Dahlgren.
George Reiling, Heinel Drive, noted that he has land which he intends to
develop.
Becky Sorlein, Dellwood Avenue, expressed support for retaining the open space
and parks.
The parks should not be taken away. The neighborhood is turning over with
small children. Do not put retail in the City Center because there are other
vacancy spaces,
Mildred Roesch, 1000 Woodhill, asked for details regarding the residency of the
members of the Task Force. She questioned the cost of the Task Force study.
She felt the draft report was not professional. Use only the land that the City
owns, but do not develop the parks.
Page 4 of 5
--
.
Don Deutch, 1781 Dellwood, recommends no encroachment in existing parks.
Plan well in the future by using the space already owned.
Lois Hopp, Parkview Terrace, expressed concern about the government decision
process and eminent domain. The activity and community centers do not
always make money. Leave the parks as they are, do not develop them. What
plans are there for the land west of Oxford. She opposed traffic from
Community Center on Oxford. She wants to be informed. (Her first notice went
to Cambridge, MN).
George Warner stated the definition of the district is important, This is a
railroaded project.
Delores Ford, Dellwood, felt there should be no buildings on the corner. The
vision has come too late for a city center. Do not develop Howard Johnson. The
uses should be spread throughout the city.
Sue Synestegard, Dellwood Avenue, recommended no development in Howard
Johnson Park. She recommended no retail because it added traffic to Woodhill.
More retail would impact the neighborhood.
Don Anderson, Chair of Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission, stated he
shared the concern that Howard Johnson Park is not developable or replaceable.
If the ball parks in Central Park were proposed as City Center there would be a
major impact. The Arona Community Center should be replaced and moved to
the City Center. The City Center may have a lack of parking space for big events.
Cooperative efforts with other cities and the school district may help relieve the
space needs,
Chair Keith Wietecki read letters into the record from:
Bruce and Jean Urman. Woodhill Joan Goepert, Woodhill
Wallace Herren, Roseville Band Wendell Brown
Jan Vanderwall suggested emergency shelter and service center be added for the
government center.
Dick Houck said the audience was not yet representative of the Roseville
residents consensus.
AI Kehr said he has contacted over 2000 voters. The results are 180 degrees
from the 1998 phone survey.
No further comments were offered.
The meeting adjourned at 8;55 p.m..
Q:\CITYCENT\TASK FORCE NOTES_05,20.99,doc
Page 5 of 5
Comments relative to City Center Complex
Don Anderson, Chairman, Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission
May 20,1999
The Parks and Recreation Commission has taken no formal position on the work of the City
Center Task Force. I have informed them of our actions on a regular basis, as has Bob
Bierscheid, Director of Parks and Recreation.
However, we have on many occasions reiterated the need to replace the Activity Center on
Arona and to move the activities located therein elsewhere. The deteriorating condition of the
roof has led to mold, damp floors. In addition the heating system and other facilities need
renovation and, or replacement. As one who has spent a great deal of time in the building, I
can attest to these needs.
As early as August, 1994, we have discussed the possible replacement. While we haven't
been asked to formally recommend replacement we have concurred on the action of the City
Council in 1996 to solicit bids from developers for redevelopment of this site, leaving a portion
for a neighborhood park. Bids were received but no action was taken by the Council. The
Commission feels that selling the Arona site, and using the proceeds from this sale to move
the activities to the Skating Center site would be in the best interests of the community.
The community room, walking track, and in part, the fitness room, added to the Skating Center
as Phase II reflect partly shifting of some of these activities. We have discussed, a Phase "'
potential that would move the remaining meeting rooms, storage areas and Parks and
Recreation offices to an addition attached North of the present structure, curving slightly
around the oval.
One major concern we have had in moving more recreational activities to the City Center site
is the lack of adequate parking. Normally, parking can accommodate the nightly (and daily)
activities, but parking becomes very tight when major events occur at the Skating Center-
the Oval, Ice Arena and Community Room. Fortunately, one season's experience seems to
indicate that existing parking will work.
As far as other recreational and community activities being located on the site, we have had
little or no discussion. The Parks and Recreation Commission has strongly supported
cooperation with the School District - the shared Elementary School gyms and the Gymnastic
Center at the High School being examples. We have looked at other nearby community
centers and have felt that pursing cooperative efforts, either with those communities, the
school district or other public bodies, given the space constraints maybe the better route to
travel. Some of the community and recreational activities proposed by the Task Force for the
City Center site would fall into this category.
In conclusion, I would reiterate the feeling of the Parks and Recreation Commission that top
priority be given to replacing the Activity Center on Arona, with top consideration given to
moving the activities to a Phase III site attached to the Skating Center. This would be the most
cost effective solution for Roseville.
--
lIT
CO~DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT
~
2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville,MN 55113
Fax: 651-490-2931 Phone: 651-490-2279
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
TO: City Council Members: Mayor Dan Wall 651.636.9600; John Goedeke (mail); Dean
Maschka 651.644.9142; Barb Mastel 651.488.2270; Don Wiski 636-7334
Steve Sarkozy, City Manager
City Center Task Force Members:
Keith Wietecki 905-1508; Lois Sinn Lindquist 636-7334; Patricia Johnson 633-1891;
Peggy Egli 625-1268; Donald Anderson (mail); Richard Bates 332-9013; Perrie Heitler
484-9189/Heitler@gateway.net; Thomas Johnson 835-7296; Joseph Smith 482-9727;
Scott J Bergs 335-1657; Ann M Hermes 481-8704(home)/486-8601; Craig Klausing 205-
4200; Jan Vanderwall 483-2534
Kim Way, Ellerbe Becket 376-2552
FROM: Dennis Welsch, Community Development Director
Date ffime Sent:
06.29.99 11:00 a.m.
Comments: For your information: Letter from Don Anderson, City Center Task
Force, regarding Modification of City Center Boundaries
\~C\
ro<?J
,.
.., "
MEMO:
\lJ}). \tt'\
v~
TO:
City Center Task Force
DOnAnderS~ ~
FROM:
DATE:
July 1, 1999
SUBJECT:
Modification of City Center Boundaries
I am sorry that I won't be present to state my concerns on modifying the western boundary of the City
Center study area in person. However, I have other commitments for this date that were made before the
switch in dates caused by the cancellation of our regularly scheduled meeting on June 17th.
As I reflect on the boundaries that we modified at our May 20th meeting and on the comments we
received at that meeting from residents regarding Howard Johnson Park, I feel that we should move the
west boundary to the west side ofthe Skating Center (Oval) site.
While we could argue that retaining the present west boundary is necessary for, possible, future City
Center needs, we have made similar arguments for including the Owasso school property and the mobile
home area in these boundaries. Both of the later boundaries were modified at the May
meeting and are no longer included in the City Center study area.
Removing Howard Johnson Park from the study area would be consistent with the above decision, but
more importantly, would maintain the provisions of the Park and Recreation System Plan which calls for
one neighborhood park in each planning district, Howard Johnson is the neighborhood park for this
planning district. Recent acquisitions of park land, i.e. Pioneer Park and Owasso Hills, completes this
system of neighborhood parks for the city. Elimination of Howard Johnson as a neighborhood park
would require the acquisition to additional land as a replacement. Both Vista 2000 and the Parks
Infrastructure Report also endorse the concept of neighborhood parks in each planning district.
Therefore I would recommend that the western boundary of the City Center study area be moved to the
western boundary of the Skating Center (Oval) site. This would be consistent with overall park planning
and should relieve the neighbors concerns.
Thanks for your consideration.
;~
~
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING #11
Thursday, June 17, 1999
6:30 p,m. - 9:00 p.rn" City Hall
Theme of Meeting:
Complete Work on Phase 1 Boundary and Concept Work
I.
Call to Order
6:30 pm
II.
Review of May 20, 1999 Meeting Notes
6:35 pm
Action Requested: Review meeting noted and comments from past meeting.
Action Requested: Thank Richard Bates for his contributions to the Task Force
Phase 1 work and wish him well on new job responsibilities which take him out of
town. (Mr. Bates has detennined he can no longer take the time to serve through
Phase 2.) ~ .~/"i ,~dr,WId-cdu'/T()1lM7~?
<1\~~.
III. Clarification on Planning District Boundary
(Plan. Comm. Hearing still scheduled for July 14, 1999) 6:45 pm
Action Requested: Determine a boundary for the planning area (including
comments from meetings in May, from Pat Johnson, and from Peggy Egli). The
boundary will complete the Phase I "boundary and area" study. This boundary
can then be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their meeting on July 14,
1999, along with Kim Ways conceptual uses plan which provides more detail
about where, within the planning area, the various land uses fit best.
Action Requested: Through Dennis Welsch, the Task Force should report on this
activity to the Planning Commission and Council, seek their direction, but not
request further hearings until more detail is completed on the "Detailed City
Center Concepts" portion of the study which is Phase 2
IV. Interest Group Discussions/Public Comment
6:55 pm
Action Requested: Consolidate the Phase 1 comments received at the public
meetings and ask if there are other comments not covered that should be
included in this report.
Action Requested: Determine how residents (city~wide) will continue to have
public input into the process during Phase 2 "Detailed City Center Concepts"
(\~~
&'\
r
..
Action Requested: Determine how residents (the affected neighborhood) will
continue to have public input during Phase 2, especially as it relates to their
neighborhood. (In addition to the public meetings, an Ad Hoc committee of
neighborhood residents may be the most effective method.)
v.
Refinement of Site Concepts (Kim Way)
7:15 pm
Action Requested: Determine a more specific conceptual uses plan which
provides more detail about where, within the planning area, the various City
Center uses fit best. Use this as the second part of the Phase 1 report for the
Planning Commission and City Council.
VI. Other Items
8:50 pm
Action Requested: Establish a starting date for Phase 2, the "Detailed City Center
Design Concepts". It is likely that Phase 2 work may take up to 9 months./fthe
work and monthly meetings begin in July, 1999, the completion would be in
February or March, 1999.
VII. Adjourn
9:00 pm
Next Planning Commission Meeting: Wednesday, July 14,1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, July 151999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Council Meeting:
Monday, June 29,1999 (6:30 pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 05.20.99; District Description; One-an-One Interview Summaries
Q:\CITYCEN1\ActionAgenda- (06,17..99),doc
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING #11
Thursday, June 17, 1999
6:30 p,m. - 9:00 p,m., City Hall
I. Call to Order 6:30 pm
II. Review of May 20,1999 Meeting Notes 6:35 pm
III. Clarification on Planning District Boundary
(plan. Comm. Hearing still scheduled for July 14, 1999) 6:45 pm
IV. Interest Group DiscussionslPublic Comment 6:55 pm
v. Refinement of Site Concepts (Kim Way) 7:15 pm
VI. Other Items 8:50 pm
VII. Adjourn 9:00 pm
Next Planning Commission Meeting: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, July 151999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Council Meeting:
Monday, June 29,1999 (6:30 pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 05.20,99; District Description; One-an-One Interview Summaries
Q:\CITYCENl\Agenda (06, ] 7..99),doc
~
c.,(\,f\~
~
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING #11
Thursday, June 17, 1999
6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., City Hall
Theme of Meeting:
Complete Work on Phase 1 Boundary and Concept Work
I.
Call to Order
6:30 pm
II.
Review of May 20, 1999 Meeting Notes
6:35 pm
Action Reauested: Review meeting noted and comments from past meeting.
Action Requested: Thank Richard Bates for his contributions to the Task Force
Phase 1 work and wish him well on new job responsibilities which take him out of
town. (Mr. Bates has detennined he can no longer take the time to serve through
Phase 2.)
III. Clarification on Planning District Boundary
(Plan. Comm. Hearing still scheduled for July 14, 1999)
6:45 pm
Action Requested: Detennine a boundary for the planning area (including
comments from meetings in May, from Pat Johnson, and from Peggy Egli). The
boundary will complete the Phase I "boundary and area" study. This boundary
can then be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their meeting on July 14,
1999, along with Kim Ways conceptual uses plan which provides more detail
about where, within the planning area, the various land uses fit best.
Action Requested: Through Dennis Welsch, the Task Force should report on this
activity to the Planning Commission and Council, seek their direction, but not
request further hearings until more detail is completed on the "Detailed City
Center Concepts" portion of the study which is Phase 2
IV. Interest Group Discussions/Public Comment
6:.55 pm
Action Requested: Consolidate the Phase 1 comments received at the public
meetings and lifSk if there are other comments not covered that should be
included in this report.
Action Requested: Determine how residents (city-wide) will continue to have
public input into the process during Phase 2 "Detailed City Center Concepts"
<\ (~O\
Cx
Action Requested: Determine how residents (the affected neighborhood) will
continue to have public input during Phase 2, especially as it relates to their
neighborhood. (In addition to the public meetings, an Ad Hoc committee of
neighborhood residents may be the most effective method.)
v.
Refinement of Site Concepts (Kim Way)
7:15 pm
Action Requested: Determine a more specific conceptual uses plan which
provides more detail about where, within the planning area, the various City
Center uses fit best. Use this as the second part of the Phase 1 report for the
Planning Commission and City Council.
VI. Other Items
8:50 pm
Action Requested: Establish a starting date for Phase 2, the "Detailed City Center
Design Concepts fl. It is likely that Phase 2 work may take up to 9 months. If the
work and monthly meetings begin in July, 1999, the completion would be in
February or March, 1999.
VII. Adjourn
9:00 pm
Next Planning Commission Meeting: Wednesday, July 14,1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Center Meeting:
Thursday, July 15 1999 (6:30 pm)
Next City Council Meeting:
Monday, June 29,1999 (6:30 pm)
Attachments: Meeting Notes 05.20.99; District Description; One-on-One Interview Summaries
Q:\CITYCEN1\ActionAgenda- (Q6,17..99),doc
-
.
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Roseville, Minnesota
PHASE II (draft:6/15/99)
Scope of Services ( Draft )
L Concept Alternatives
Task A - Prepare a study model at 1"=100' for use in working with the Task Force to prepare
concept alternatives to be studied,
Task B - Revise, refine and document development program to be used in generating concept
alternatives.
Task C - (July 1999) Work session with Task Force to explore concept alternatives using the
study model.
Task D - Based on the City Center area and program uses prepared in Phase I, prepare a series of
concept alternatives.
Task E - (August 1999) Work Session with Task Force to review, refine the concept alternatives
and to select a preferred concept alternative.
ll. City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Task A - Based on the preferred concept alternative, refine and revise the plan to create a draft
master plan for the City Center.
Task B - Prepare a revised and refined development program based on the draft master plan.
Task C - (September 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft master
plan and development program.
Task D - Based on comments and feedback from City Center Task Force revise and refine draft
master plan.
Task E - (October 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review and discuss final
City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
III. Implementation Strategy, Action Plan and Final Report
Task A - Based on City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy, prepare draft
Implementation Strategy and Action Plan. This effort will establish specific projects to be
implemented, preliminary costs for each project, the anticipated time frame for implementation,
potential funding sources and who will be t,he implementor.
(;, ,~> -0&\
Task B - (November 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review Implementation
Strategy and Action Plan.
Task C - Prepare draft final report for review and comment by City Center Task Force.
Task D - (December 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft final
report for the City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
Task E - (January 2000) Work session with Planning Commission and City Council to review
Center Master Plan and Development Strategy report and recommendations.
Task F - (February 2000) Draft Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Report.
Task G - (March 2000) Final Presentation to Planning Commission and City Council
Q:\Comdev\citycenter\Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy Phase lI.doc
-
.
Roseville City Center
Roseville, Minnesota
Phase II (draft:6/15/99)
Schedule and Time Frame
July 1999 - Prepare Concept Alternatives
August 1999 - Review and refine Concept Alternatives
September 1999 - Refine preferred Concept Alternative and Prepare Draft Master Plan and
Development Strategy
October 1999 - Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
November 1999 - Implementation Strategy and Action Plan
December 1999 - Draft Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
January 2000 - Work session with Planning Commission and City Council
February 2000 - Draft Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy Report
March 2000 - Final Presentation to Planning Commission and City Council
~~
(; \S .
Page I of2 ,
~~ ~h f-e
Welsch, Dennis
From: David and Ida Meikle [davenida@jps.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08,199910:12 PM
To: dennis.welsch@cLroseville.mn.us
Dennis,
Here's a copy of what I just sent to Keith Wietecki-
f~
-~
Keith,
I won't be at the June meeting as I'm in California till 6/19, but I wanted to pass along a few thoughts I've had
since the public meeting. I hope you'll share them with the other members.
I would not agree with any plan that would remove park land and put buildings on it. It's not fair to residents
who bought nearby properties because of parks, nor is new park land in neighborhoods very easy to come by,
Parks are precious and we should preserve them, Open space, beyond its recreational use, is a valuable
amenity and is not replaceable by a community building, The only place I might consider a "city center" type
function in a park is at Lexington/B where there previously was a school; a community facility location (sharing
park user parking) might help resolve the controversy about use of that corner.
With respect to the city center boundaries, I think the reasoning behind the different boundaries varies too
much. If land is within the proposed CC boundary, it should be there for a greater purpose than planning
bike/ped trails, sign age, or expected impact. The CC boundary should encompass the land that is intended to
be developed as a city center (or related uses). Perhaps we should rethink whether any area N of Woodhill
should be included, or whether the spur at the south side of County C towards Victoria should be included.
I understand the need to establish boundaries within which we can develop more advanced designs for city
center components, but if I lived adjacent or near to our current proposed boundaries, I would really want to
know what, of our "laundry list" of possible functions, would be where. It's only fair to disclose our current
thinking on this to residents, to somehow let them know if they are likely to be next to a path, a parking
structure, or a community or civic building. Once the district is adopted and plans are more advanced,
development proposals would need to be consistent with the plan, as I understand it. Any information we can
give people now may make the district more palatable to those most affected. I was disappointed that Kim
didn't present any rough designs to the public in last month's meeting, since most of those folks probably hadn't
seen them before.
Best wishes for June, and see you next month,
~ /A/' rJ\
6/9/99
-------
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
1""
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
~(\\......I-\ ~, ~ ~ /} ~ ()Q~
\
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
}J ()
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
Nn
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
tJD
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
lD..t ~o.u..L ~ ~
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
_~UN--~~~~~~
~ ~(~ Q (bQ"':. ~ "
;;;J::
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENfER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
--- ----
-------
}~A CII,
I I "
v'--) ~,
~. ,~......( (~ >
:C,.,'C
f t'1J.....~ 7i :- _).. _oJ. f l,..'- -;-
'I '.
,1~/~" -,.rl'~-C:' ::' H. ':'-
:;,;'- -
I
;,! _ '~'~t :.--v..::+- ;"" ;'l:;.I_J.<..~'~/
~1._,'j \....-1.. '. i.~..' \.,- '\
.:.....:...'t/,II L-.' i -
,) 1~I.,(t.'Ij1...<"'" ~"..,
t /\
~'
.()<" (-~"" ~
I,; (..' i'f...~.L_~ .~
- -
~~~~ \~":'.C(~....__.I.
, -- -
_.;---. \~
;' -, ,
,-C5-( (. (. L ,_---
, ( HJ-C 1..>' f:t{; '".-r---
,_.-<. ;'.'.. .~.i -'~,,,.,/
( '
.; '7,;;' -'.. "F--'
, '
IS:O ,L,_
-
.,~~ i_I' '__
--..;[;.. ~ , " I
. ! -:.. .... '--
I
~1.',,(
I ."
I
C i.. (_
,,_ f
. -...!-
:.: (_ . c,'
..
, I ..:-
L (,po..- '- ~
~'
.
.,;'--'-
r _"l.It; Lt..:..- ,_..:", o.~"'" .', ..<..--
~/:..I......~_ .-2.f:- '" .-::::..C........i. ~...~".Ii
......... "
r i.~ci
'.. '-.
-,
,
f -, -~
(' }__ L,
, /
--;" -~ ;,.,. - -::
.-,,' ~ \. ,
! /
-,; ( .
~
--I
..i'
i.~.(_ :--~
".
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ~ INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
(/~ 5Q)YnJ?... - ~ ~ty-- ~ a Y1>>-L
2.
THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
, ;A---~~,
3.
DO ~~NT~R OF IDENTITY?
4.
'~,
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
_ '-4t4 n/~'
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING r.~OM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INIT't! !)REMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
71tr-p.<-.
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
wi L-- tft AA.& _ UXR...o'
4.
DO WE WANT AN!!.!.fW'ED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? I
/1;0
,
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENWF T~CREAT!ON CENTER?
, ~...; '.d. L.R / .J :I: --
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING P.lJOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
u)~ ~./ ;;r-
.
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
CJ
3. DO
4.
5.
6.
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING [.\>OM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? ;J' I1 . L!IJ I ,
~~:ti_ Y /\;uL c-{i 4(;
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE,5.20,99doc.doc
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE I~T:.tt PREMI~ OF, CI~ C'!f:ER SOU~. ? rI
~:: ~ €i ~II 4 f)V'IV "1'1.1 I!Mr~s..
r/ur/r>
2. WHAT DO YOU T I THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
CO ~ 4
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTI~r? I
.:r:: ~Ot~~ .f~-"rl ~If Vt~.~ .
4.
DO WE{W ANT 4ND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? {' I
:I " V'€~ tf -/ ~ q:-1. "fv, 0 fA ~ >: e-'-1~: 0 · ~ ~ IJs
It>/ C/-- iJ ,c!e I"" o..cr ulll~ ::;:: d ''j IA.~{J ~,
, I
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
)::{.. 1'1- /J //t 0 1/ ( rlt!' J e CC t1 0 u..... v 0 ( .r CJ'J (-e
-' (
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5,20.99doc.doc
-
-------
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INI IAL REMISE~OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
( ~-
/ tALI, ~ OC:1i jiu;j ~ a. c::<r<-C ~.h(V'("A4-- ,7
WJIAT DO YO,U 'fHI~ JHE FOCUS Of A CITY CENTER ~HOULD')B~I.
7:::-$d:1i ~d - JJhJi'}j ~. F"--'- r I'~<r--L
f '
(.~p;/
2.
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
f4-
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICESTOGETH ?
A/tJi It.~ .
7.
(
. - ~ Oh:j-.J../.-;'
WHAT ARE THE MEEtING ROC~.~ COMPONENTS OF A
C~.fZ~~ dnnQ>fiil~~ 6J;
~.' ~~f7/4A/~ -~
Q:\CITYCENf\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
(,.:/:.~..... .-. ~
2.
3.
4ULu~
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?, ., -tJ--. '-<.d:h
, . ~A~'Y-f~L.-q- CO/1-Jx1Al ~ (,r. C~~{;'f'. W
-<I'D ,n~ ~ (f"lLL'---">.....,...r .h-C..:... I j - ~ ~b<< f:;Lb'~~.(.J.
; J 'l/~~/'
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEEp A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES OGETHER? .,' ,
J.--1.I.{ / j!j;; J1A.,~ {t.<.L,(k' 1u .~L..( iU2t
5.
6.
, 6
t ~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~UNITY CENTEl\f . . .--J.
J ~~ f41h.;/f c(.~".~ (If 1'/",
o.~'~ ,.R;;; <W-'-lcuJI i<'-I)" /
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
\fl~J ~ t-:fA\. J~~/"r4 ~ ~~
\..J-. I1.L f~J:-~/--f
o '+,' - /U;1..v-d"--1
:::J-'" i./.J f\AJI'- P f v tl
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ~~: ~NIT~ :~~MI~?~ C~:~C~E~UNDk ~ ~,
~.J- ~--'/o--~" -Ku..A. rA_ (\~cv-.~d.J..r-",^ 1'''-'
'OJ~. 51 (.,yd:;;',
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
t:J0A_' ,.;;., i'"" r, -r- ,t. ~ ..- r: lA_ . _
f^- rU"'~-"'-- :.. 1"'--.. '~...J-~ ~ """"""-'-""", 'J-. r ~-
~'h--u ",,1-, (~) :~.__
2.
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
NOe ~ l)",v. ~ 'J v~'--- ~
4.
Dr!: W;:~D/~ED~N~.P~~E\~ .
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
IV:J +- M p./j:;.,.:: ~"--r-/ .JJ1.- ~ l
\., -,
6.
WHA)' ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
r~......wcL ~ tA.- ~ ~ ~
~, ~~('~
---
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNIr2;,:~~TEj: ~ ~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc,doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. CENTER SOUND?
vI/' -
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
---r {)-U f\ WI./ A---"+ ;I-- pJ-.<-h /; G ,yr..U., -h ^(' //Y2 u I,/), - ~
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
?1L? '
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
-11 i) .
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERV}CESTOGETHER? I
.1::...1 W 1JU-td k {' 0fJ Ul'"- ~-r
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
)I}?/A. {fi - ~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
S tlu+-d .D tpJ~, {tJ'ryt j P"'- fah u /<JL~jhj' LA J .K!-CJv .jJ~f-
a.~ .. Y\. yV). ~ (j) I - l.k<t.-R
/7t::rIT;;:U=;J;::;5:Z'::~A i<- lli e-;/v OA,",{J ~ f.,,U
(tMid.utd 9Q- cU "i (Ud i i<A f- - ~ l{)i)IC d- c-J), ~
~ dVcA.; La IdJ r {SfaCL t2J&; !?-t<<. J j'iJ1- ;;L}LPcA a. -~" ~~,~.
" J / , ., ~I t' /' h. . / l~ ," . I ~ ~ _ /, , ..... J/t. ;1\ ,f- r fW'l'\~"" . . )r
II!
4.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
71.. Co i...) fJ J... ?'f<"M'Y\.f.s Q.. J&~~ hlCe. if 40 .Y~ '^- hC!.~
~ If (
p{"-"'~ \ "4 ~ ~, ~65~ ~li!l7 --'Vr~ )....lA rOlo4reJ..r.
\J I " r .. - -I
-:r::- b.z. () @Vet e c)e:...J ~ c2... 4P- e.x/f;:T)~ pb...~J )s IO"jl- r~/~ f{'-'vt)'
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD :aE? ').
c:.....<.>..A.A'11t ~~ V\.I..U' 7........ro. a r~-.r i' ~ ""''1', / f'~ ~ ~ ~<.
( I r \
0(. ~rc-t-)""J fe..$u)ce.\ e\. -b"L<(tJJjf
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
w~ ~c. e""lt... Le. h J ~ 1- (J v; O'\j ',-r_
2.
3.
,
~f$ N
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? '--
~-+-'s ~.J "'~l I... ,~~ (7 C~Jz<!!!),. ~)(JH';'
- 1\ f[ L SA. f'__ c:,..te.. ~ \i ~ c.-. , <' , P S J L-..c".......A~ re. (~cJ~ ~ Ce. T~
.".. V\... .
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
T ~~ -f.. (~'LA._ ",,-","",r~ ~,,~ ~J 7?....-e. Ov~
"j "4-~"7 ~ .t~r ~~7 A.,) () -rJtZ,J .! ~rv) C.E r
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROC.'.: COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
,'- I..... L
,
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
I' ~ 2781 'De Ii<-vOoJ (' f.
J""- ~~~~,,-L I,.)
6 '5 b- 5S :s (
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
......~
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
11;; '0/7 ~~ @~/j
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
j0,
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
~
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENfER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.2D,99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
.. /, /7
I :, I
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
C ,"J I .." (J . , " t'
/ / I t C j '\ c,.(' tJ.. \~ . ( ()' 7.....', tl ~ : (-l, .' . ';ttl .:.;J...-
I} c' , t: .Lei ,..' -- !f '( t' .' i ': 'h') ,e'C' ,:1/7 z< / (!...~(.[T(
D(~~E~'A ~~~E~ (}l~~~~;I;~~ l vL ((C, /
C/;' ["
:> 2 /'.{," ;'([/.?~ _'{L.;' -!ie< ,~c:(
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEE~ SENSE OF PLACE?
, ! :. -I> A"'C LtL("" / <c:.' )7~:-~----
2.
/~ 1'2 ...~., t
,
f1 _'
\.- . ~'"..... " ..
3.
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHE~? .--~ _". " I'
.9 (L L~', I I, ( 7.7~, ,,' - t. ' ) ( ..' --:,.:..- f:. c, {. cLii!.'( t- / [L {:C: (, ( ti.... L '~
- --II c..( tie ~ d [ L ,1.././': 1/:./..:'--,-,_\.--. L-llf /-/t.7P' () ,/1, LC"~":"'j~
, it. / (
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
#\ ' [' , ' ~l" ic!'
----i Lt-Ll L'j (i... -' (J. ,~..' , C" (,
Q:\CITYCENT\O CENTER QUESTIONN RE.5.20.99doc. oc'l 't " {. K
" ..-
{'-f It Ld' C
(; "7"-' /
. t!-.-<~ '
7~) ii. IL I.. J <l (;J ljJ/C ~> ) i frl ~,-'- ,I t in ~'.li d(~ L- {-nr. j,C
't'
. "'.....' <... (', ,{A,~_ :,{ f ....},/' {", ~~~ , (,I" /,_'. 1 ). .'
, _0 rv 1"4.,,", - 'I_,-\.,V\~ ~'.r"'J-<"'" ..~-<.' y---
, ,
. '1"
-------
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~!' I
,[, . '
, -
2.
WHAT DO YQU THINK THE.FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
/" -u:- ~ ~;G It . ..... , ' '- -- I
"t. ~~\/~t.c\ A~, .~,/~-L/...cvL\.. (l-(--1,..-L'--I.u C..(J,\'\ {
.' . f1 - I
..x. ..~J..-0..\..~'--'.J ./_, '"' I ,:,"..~..~" "
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~ I f
C,
o
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? .
l~~~ 'l. t 'JL:~J"l ~ t \ K.. /1C'J. T'- M-v- \ r-t-[C~'
A../-1 c\ J.l.2......~~ (/1 /t-J;: A ....:.~
)
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
-YO
5.
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
/..J/J J/ -y~). J /
'~f~ / /.. (VT"'-
~,~Lt::SS ' 0'-0)""
WHAT DO YOU THINK TJ!E F~CpS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE? J
n~~ M '1~ ~ ^
~ ~ __ - : . '. ~1; nFt,' ',-( fJS - . It(}iJ..J
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
(~jJA-<.LVaj~U!:<!t' !~C<L) '14' F h A<,\:^{. ~,
,4~JJ) (~) d?A"-'<_Q ,,~..; JiZoj \, ( ()
3.
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SEN~f- OF PLACE? " () '1' ,
it!""Pk~ft:~~,::!l~':::ff ~J~L'-LC
~~E~~VE~NTCENT~R~~
SERVICES TOGETHER? " :' i
/1'. ( ?
THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
5.
6.
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
I:l~f::~.~~f,~1t:1;t:~f!~^:to~f!3 5:/.0 <
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc " /fl. _ 'p/j ..--/
W~cu.v~. .[,I~ vW I~.,
&~~~ V7f~1Jo; ~~~,~
~,rr Yd.~. , . ,-:
~?~I !,~-rC>C/ C 7 l?:.u.J-'J....>-J~&L-(>~ /L--+vi/ ! 1 i g /~.:/k '
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
, C ct~ .::;( ~ /}1/IA~~ '
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
r !J . ....;. .1$.'
" ~~1 . ~ ,J-~~.
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
1 I ~ .
-pz/~. IPfl.--~ti/~ii ~~~\~\~9' g1.L""'<-<"-:
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? I
WL~~ Cl/~~1 u'~.b~"'~~~--:
I '
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
W.v~~~~-rj;{~(~.
, (;
WHAT ARE THE MEETING RO~~<:'?MPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? J/ 'rrv
vVl/~~1~~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
---.-.-
City of
RI~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND? 1/0
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
_l\ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~i xl" (.)~~ ~,j-ftr ~~ +.rEk..
1t:!~~~~~~i:~~,~~~~V~L
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY? NO
:.~;::c,~~~)~t~"Z::ic~-~~~~'
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? NO
~,~::~~~:::~~f~f~: ~-~
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? NO
~lQr~~~~~~,~~
~~ ~ L')j;) ~JVu. ~~1j6L,k
~~~,
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~7~~~:!:;r;.'~~i.fl~~
~4
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
LJj~ L.J.Q. J\CJv.e.. -,~ct. VL~ ~ ~~ -rho (.)~ ~
~ ~4 '-~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~~! f 0<1~~_ i frL.h-f j~./ ~/".,~) /h->~~
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
..Q Q. t r a-Q.k"n Q .J .r
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~.~~~_~~ ~~I{'::::'~ L_/~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
~r ~t
/1,~~>~ ~~3 ~~J r ~~G)
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? "
r:n~ /Yl,;:t- urrz.-:T ,,~ G 11..c-r ~ --
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~~~::;:;~~1j~o~~~. ~
cJ
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
~~F~~~ ~r;.;..);' ~r-V .~
o......~~~) ~ -/{"./-r<:L_ :
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~
2.
WHAT ~HINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHO.ULD BE?
f?~ O!A'}~~rt-::t' ~
~ ~ ~r?g.-&~--
/
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
'/?.A'Y"'
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
1!:;j~;;J;~~;1 ~4~~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?,.J.- /Y, /1 '
~_?!1~ ~- ~ ~tW-"
WHAT ARE T~~ OF THE a:CREATION CENTE.R? .
~~~~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? ", A
~~ '~~~
~/~~~'''---~~'
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5,20.99doc.doc
. /O~.
a I/ffJ I rYukJ; WIG
VhB MffJ /~
~~/
-Vnoo{~
-
.
(~~ .M.v.
~~J~
--- ------.
City of
~~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
Q CV-1r<- LL ,
, -.r-.
c...'t~,,-..
2.
CENTER SHOULD BE?
~ '0/- :f. ' ~~LJ
3.
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
b JJ1Jv,",-
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
r
6.
7.
IVJ.w
..v, ~ ,~ ,
WHAT THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
Q,\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20,99,dOC.doc _ A !. J
Q~ ~.ac LLJ i ~"-O 0>-~ >>--cd.- -Y"'wJJ'd. f' }.')
c;- ~.-::'.e. (i2~ - f1-.j ~ C+ J DO" \i>Jr-to. /JJ-,- (>c<
j/)u_ul ~, c^-~wvlJ )rwJ~ .
--. \ '
r !~ce f"~~~' 0~~N,~ /i~ .,'"'01
~1r-<-- yL Q....1K.U0 .-t.L~ .,N.-J!.~ ~o..-"L:J Vi
i1M;.4ru~~ ~~~r t~~
~J i }:..?-- c, ~ ~)4.f'Y'~P~ C< ~vJ"
'd~f J-v~ Y"f'} jth~ J:y..~ >>4) .ALD~
Jj{ . ,~ 1 d&~L.JL ~l J" ~-~
'~~-+--- ,
.I w~. ~
.. ' ,r-:J', "
~ ~ .w '-tL \J ~'-..U. --:C f ,1.J cW ,
~"-A (1rt'<-~ -.- diJd, 0;' it Gr~ .c" i~
(; ,0 0" ,~-~"), -
~ ~ i; "U,~ /k /1: r4 ~ ol~l vi (}J.,--,~ J
i "(JJ.tL..CL ~ v~I:'~ fAcc"-<> - wt, ~. .
'", u~V-/.? LAAA1-~ ~ j J - J I 11
UI'--~v~ ",k...1 I~! J.f .A~/.M.~J-
-
.
Memo via Fax
To:
CC:
City Center Task Force Members
Steve Sarkozy, Kim Way ....-.n. t.J/" ..
Dennis Welsch (651-490-2232) \JV"'-
OS/27/99
City Center Boundary as of May 20, 1999
From:
Date:
Re:
Attached are two maps which are my interpretation of the new boundaries of the City
Center District Please review and comment
Kim mentioned to me at the last meeting that the Task Force did include the
southeast comer of Lex and C in the planning district in order to provide access into
Central Park. We simply omitted placing that space on the map. Perhaps we could
talk about that (small issue) at the next Task Force meeting June 17th.
1
rJ1 }\~
l'
'. .. .
~~:::. '\ . "'~';'~~:c~::,\ t '~; ;;0 Ii i:: ...\.. 'Q;: 1 ~.., t ... "
.~,~~~~~-(.~:~~\: t 1 '::;~ \.. ~ l\~,'<~~:::~~.fji:-,....d~...~ji:"
...~::;' \ .sr\' 1 ~\' ; i w. 0 : . ,~\ ~.:,~, '...~':;"~;'~jI,\~iNf:LS ,::
. ,~~:-~, .':\~~ ~>~'I: : :~...__,.__-::-: ! _.:~,\t ~~..... wi:;: '.;: i '. i:,
..~'.:,~.. .~::-.... ::1.. ':NNiol;jso~.. :. ~ · · · '''', ~\\.., :, I .;: I ..;', ,;:
".'::\.. (f)~,,:~~__ _::. ~ ~ r II. .IS I.....f I, of 1,8\ · :1 · .. I 11, . I ___,. ':,! .:,1
.. '.' '" ~ '~"" ': ~ ,--...................1',. ''\) ":I.'!::., t!:i .;::. ..
\:~:.:~.. ... ~:11 i i ~. ~:i~;.viW~;r~t. .. .! : !:..:.....,.,L.....~jL~..~.~jL~....' i!
. ".":'~\ !I(':" ::... ...,::........J.&.:s\,:~',' .;(LS""'''::-~:''''''''!(I--~'^i:OO~i
,. ...IIU.. . " ' ~ 'II %, ' , "...." ,,~.... ......:'
~~';"~ ::~- ::1' .:::;;~Oii\':!i _ _~ f:;' tH~ I::" "i"- .::
~;-:.. :i, ::,. .n, 'I"':iJ I " 1"10. I:: 1 ,A:,,, ~:" I;:
~...:<~ i ~....::;~~__~j! ~..'.,... i:1t " f i! I f H.. Ii!'. '. Ii'. · H
...... ,rI~ ..."............._....."1 I .,'. "" '",\ 1..1 I"
\'.~ i, -. . ';",...~~'i! ; .." . :i. . i, :. !:' .. Ii.. .. iJ
~.... ~ :' l~' " ,".g .;: I, . i! "0 .:: I "':; rI' " ,:
\:.:,;j.. o.J 06;f>j ~" I!:' l!i" jii'- rn~ .Iii
_, ,'....... g:;'..... .,,'.,,' _ ~ .,'t ...It. "I ,,'. ....
.,.. : ,.~~,;:_....,i...,<::::,':';"~. It:! . i: .. ;, L .::.. ~::
: ; r;.~~.:.~~~;~,..:.- . .. r3::~1 ~:: ~ -- :!:= >>::1 ~ ~:i ;" Ii "
\ .. _m ~. I m' L ~.. 3:".. - " "
~:~"'" ' / \,.:}~;'=~~."""".j)ig~~~:~1~~~-~[:t'~.ll
;:: 'fi":'~':. , -"-j,..."...~.',......,..:':~.'.":,'...:.,...~':~::> ..: "~I,:,: i ~~ ,!:,i~,:~;;t',;,;ro,i~~.:"..Nw.J..;::;,',:::: ~I-: I ,!,i,',l :1:1
-. ::,!,:,i ~....' ~~.J~'!,t:,(:::'~::""'::~,:""", .... :, :.;;;'~' ~ ... .
_... ,&~.\ f U" .~!...f if I Ii if
. ., < _" ~ "Q ."".. . . ". . '. . . d,'
-q t .iE ~ M ..__.! i' ,..... ,,:i,~,','~.".".'~,",'.~.',"'~,,..,~,':,..;,..,..., ":,,,,!. t,:,i::"lf.~:!,',,~:!:,:ii [i ,,::):,',:,',',1::1,',,1
'l,l:~~t~i...::'~.':~:";":~AI3,,:,",:,",,,:.:r.;,"~~:,:;;::',:,!; (I J ':, ':' ,............,........:,,(ji .. .., 31" 0' ~ ",,,'
~ 1M ,/;~~$4t:i~ i! ~ :: ..,i~ ~ ,/'H\\
..... ........ ~:i~.. _ .:i'l ':\& CI),'..._......::Ij...t :' >:"" ;, :""
_._:_'~: ::: ::::: ::-:.;::::::::: :~:::..:...~. .'__-:::::::: ::: ::::: :~.;,;f'" _....._ - - I \
-.... ......~. .....,a............. ::::!
i:t:
.. J.. _ ." .. . ......_....11...., . Q
10
"~':'~:~::~~~":::::7::~~j~~8~~. \ i
IN~!g~:::::'::: ';:,::::,::', ':, ' ., r~am .~~\,,""~' -O~ li~ ~ ~;~"\:'\if' · ~ 11 ~: ~ 'Ii: JC \ : .; \1' NO.LeNIX3'7 \. ri r
.. .. .,... ;3~i::" " 'ri · 'l" .. I .,,' III: ". :ii
. i Q: :t=,~~~iL'.!. '.' ii" '! 1 Ii I , ii: ~' '\il\:
~ i .. -=.,;::1 1 / . I:' 1:,,' ':1"., Wi
0\, '-'_.J:9.'....,/..o J:'~I!. ~iL:'- ii,
"",',.,.~,..,"",.,"""""~"'~,'.,:,w,.,.,.,-,~l n ~iM ~l ~~f" WI; Ii
. :::::::: lI:i, ~\.. ",II: '" ~:I: ~ ,," : I I.:
\'",..............,.// gc:;::::::,:, ',i, '''',)\"..w."."..."."Bi....,,' :.1, '.... ': ': . :,' ,,' !,",i,',!
f::::~:::',,:':''''''':::::::': 0 .... :.~~SI"'./j' //""lHi :: :: :'!
":S:=:!t ~i!.. ::!,
\llfN'iR~ 1".,... : '...........' '........... , . .'
f~~~1Ii _.~. \~~~~;:':;\:ii'
Q"" 11)...' ~.. I" II" .I ,,,,
;; 0:', . ,,:: ;;.: ::.'", . i: :,: ;;::
~;;...._....~::. ,..... ::0. ';:0 :. ...... .: :...... ~:: ::::
':'~:T:;:::~!' i:~~:~::~::aNiii>>w/':::::::::'~':::];: :;:.I'::::~:~'3It'~::,~:,~,:.:,~.:::::::,.::"""'.:'~; i~'.::'~:~~:;::~:~.,~:,.~:\!~::;:::~;:,:-\)ft"-'iijj;i;j;ii:~'::.~.I.:'j.i"I'::,T:H:\~,
:' "1:::,., .. :: ...~. - Ii(::. '. :: ",:: ~o::::::
" ;;~I!BDN'. I sr':. .:ijo9r.N~HSt" .:::a 1"1';i:,::
~I :ltri!jr~2~~~~{~~111 ~J.-I- !!i=::=;\!I~ ~:I\ 1',)\I~i\~
0::::: ~:: ~:,t\~8"'~ ~,.o :: ~ .:'....n......n..'......'......, I::: 0 :..:1 ::::
..~:\. ~!! ~ li':~~:::~:\\i~ Hi Ii .,.:' tij _ (j I~".~';'~~J! 1\1: 0-- :: ",
..n'" _:: t. ;; '. ... "I i ,,! ;, ." .. ~ ~ ;:....'.....'..iIi::"..........'... :;;
':.. '.." ....ij; ""i" ..". ~b ,'.......]1;"..-..-....
.c ~~'\~":,;"'~::li : Jf";~:d~~'j~:ljtf;~1!\
_ . ~. .i? .." ~r::o~k:;:",-1~~!Jl~;';7~~\\\, .,-
I .... . J .. . ......, . ~!! # I ~\.---......" ts:'<::"~'\ Ci<.,
I. . I . . ..::/ ~:: ~\ ; ~J~.), g: : j::
I -II ~ LLlNG//'~ It; ~:\, I:! " ,;f~"';;:;':~;::.f:J;
.. " (J: i .. _' VI'" y-:,....-;;,:.:, "~, i
"b :jS;
.~;:
5j!
<tt' ,
- -/ ~:;::':;.
'~""
,'0.9 :
:-':':'~' ',"c' ,
m~i\
::::
/n\
.::. .
.:::::;;:':/((::,::: '-""~i';'
<1z ~
"
oJ::
~
~
'"
~~
0.. ~
~1!
~ ~
u 0
5 t-~
: i.~
.,~~
:1
'"
~
~
==~
o
.~ ~
~
CI.I
~ ~
~(l.
~~
~~
~~
c
~~
~5
==~
~1
c.
--.g.
~~
==~
~~
.0
C
~"..
, ~ ...
'~.,~ Ii
~~ !'i;
. 'C: i
,5 0
~"'E!
>',,0\
oCeO\
~ g.~
1<1- ~
e-"'~
...~:::E
1>-<0
~
'I
8
~ 1-
Q)
E
Q) I
u
] .8 :NST
~u
Q) Q)
.2: -S
r:n
~4-t1J
~ ~ 1llIJ
0.. -0 =rIJ]
8 S ffiET
u2
Q) Q)
-S r:n
o ~-
--+->-0
--+-> a
5-
8 Q)
-o-S
~~
Q) r:n
~;=:
~
a~
~ Q)
c.8-o
a
--+->
o
.~ Z
.- ~
-0 Q)
(1)-
r:n:=
~ >
-0 (1)
a ~
-~
~ tf -
(1) ._
~ ~
ro r:n
.-
~Q
(1)
~
o
o
--+->
--+->
r:n
(1)?
~ 0
~.-
Q)~
~ r:n
(1) ......
:::::0
.- M
> (1)
~E
o Q)
~u
4-t~
o ._
~u
. ..... "-"
u
E-4
U
~
~=
=~
E-4~~
00 ~~
~ ~ ~~
-
'\ u = z ~
c- <z~
~ ~
I ~zj~
LEXINGTONA,,!N _ ~ ~ ~
~;r:~ - 0 = ~
~ I Z1i Z1i ~- = r-_' ~
o~ ~ ...- r-_' ~ ~
:e~;;- ~~ f!! /0lIlIIII ~ U
~ CbO - .....- ~ Z
~et ernm!5 ~-'='
i~ ~T!rl ~- E-4 ~G
(;)~.:r-o- ~ u ~
- ~>c';S
- ~ E-4~
DUNLAP ST N _____ 00 ~ ~
~ r--------- ~U~
~ (r---- <~~
>>! V~ ~~~
= r:I'.l <-)
<~~
E ~
....... r----. ~
~ ~,~ /7~) ~~\
~ ~ "V
U (J
R.,
o Q.I ~
~ ~ t
'u~
Go ...
~
;j :t'l! Q:1 I) (J
~ i::~ ~
a 0", ~)'
~ ~ ~)
~ 5
~ <( {;/
C") ..
0:: B~ <(
I - att:!.C")
r- t~ 0::
~HEE -
I--- <t
I- __ E ~ -
~ i2
"') Q
OXFORD ST N 1:1"
:i:
a
~
1/1 II) II)
e! e! Q.I
U U U
IV IV IV
coqco
.It) .
~It)~
.. Qj ..
U~G.I
.- e ::J
';Q.I;
i5~~
-eee
CII.s 0
II) 0)-
OeO)
0.._ e
o )("-
... CII ~
o....J..J
'0'0'0
cu-;;....
CII CII II)
<~~
iiiIVIV
- CII CII
~<<
~JI" ~_~~~$.'.;;''t~::t..'''''~-r''''-'
/~.. VlCTORIA"St;'
y,
~
C:( 1I.tr~
C") ~;~
0:: ~~~
It ..
N 1S tfl~l::J11\
--
-
--
-
S'
&~
~S
~"
~~
:I!
"r""
a:I
I
~
t.1
<
IV
CHURCHILL ST
~
-
....
In
N ....1
In In
LEXING ON AVE N
L ~ ,,"=:''''
>;;,11"
,~i'
-~!
'i~~
~~
)
II:
I!:!
~
o
o
s:
- "----
","
.~~
o:t~
~
c:
~ ~
oS E ~
.sJ;~
~ ~
~
a:I
o
Q
g
II:
~
~
o
o
C")
a:I
.~ III
::,;
'I:t i2
In~~ ~
~E ::!
~ a
o
~
~ !~~
-R.,
~
:a ~~
t'c1:;
.,..= GI
&",0
I
Em!
:ERNWQOD ST FERNWOOD srl
ffiEffiFffiE~
ffiffiE~ ~ ~ ~
E: Q!::i "'C
~ 0 ~ ::: (J
"') ~ ~ 0 ~
DELL WOOD ST JELJ.WOOZJST "" I ..... ~
BIEEtE EEEEE 1 JJST 1
I [DJD ~
GRIGGS ST N
1::3
&;~
i.~O
...::!!
~i
N -
N
-is Qo
~
'111'0-
o
Q
g
II: N
~ "-~
~ '''-...... -~
8 = =t~ DELLWOC:::N :=
-...
~ /'0......' f-- f----
"' _~- " :1
E -:5>---* ;
'oS ~+._- -
--III -
CI) !I:
=~ I ~ -
u
.::
<>
5':
-
o
o
1/1
II
_ <>
<lz ':": ~
'"
--a
<.)
en
..
Q.
..
~
c:
.!1/
Q.
U
,~
~
~
~
<>
---
.....
ct:
o I/) ~
- c
... o..!2
.! 01._ Q)
CII C - ~
... ,- CIS (IJ
C C Q.
1/)001...
Qj N 'w ~
.c CII....
CIS 't:J 0
.J ::!
-
'--
=:
~ ~!
'"' :J 21
~ ~ ~~
-..1 3 n
~~~~ 1
..r:: 0
!-< u
'--
Request For Council Action
Date: OS/24/99
Item No: J-3
Department Approval: Manager Approv~~ Agenda Section:
Item Description: City Center: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to create a City
Center District and establish the land use boundary of the District
(PF 3119)
------
Background
The Planning Commission, at their meeting of May 12, 1999, after extensive discussion and public
input, determined it appropriate to continue the public hearing to the July 14, 1999 Planning
Commission meeting, and after completion ofthe Task Force meetings.
Attached is a draft of an excerpt from the May 12th Planning Commission minutes.
In past mailings the Council meeting of May 24th was listed as another opportunity for the public
to provide input into the City Center process. Because the Planning Commission has tabled their
hearing on this topic, the staff recommends the Council table their consideration until after the
Planning Commission has submitted their recommendation to the Council.
Attached is a draft of an excerpt from the May 12th Planning Commission minutes,
Council Action Requested
By motion, table consideration of the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to Create a New
Land Use District and Establish the Land Use Boundary (City Center District) to the Council's
regular meeting of July 26,1999.
,I
Q:\Planning Files\3119_ City Center Comp Plan \RCAextension.doc
, "',) ..,rA~
G: tf \
Memo
To: City Center Task Force Members
From: Craig Klausing
Date: May 20. 1999
Re: City Center Boundaries
Given the level of "misinformation" on LDlS issue, I'm noc:
sure what it would take to make Lhe surrounding neighbors
understand that the task force is only suggesting action
that would give citizens some input into any possible
changes, and that it is not directing or even suggesting
the sort of changes some citizens have mentioned.
Because of the misinformation on this, we (the t:osk force)
might reconsider redrawing the boundaries to exclude some
or those areas where there is the greatest misunderstanding
about what the task fo~ce is suggesting, e.g., the mobile
home park, the condos. That mighc: be one way for the c:aSK
force to state unequivocally that ic: is not suggesting the
city buy the condos or c:he mobile home park.
Thank you for sharing this information with the oLhers.
fAd\
7'dO
Bruce and Jean Urman
1025 Woodhill Dr.
Rosoville, t.1N 55113
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
':;'~
-:J " --:- t
\lame .\.::> no'\..(!--'- i,' t l~i\ \. \,~ (\ l(1,,'-.
Organization
Address /i_.:.s L.,-u::.Jh.~',1 tJ,; r(~ ~:-< ,. ;:!..~
Phone f \:..:. .~. ,.-'-f
Your Roseville Property location
~rt....,-,- tlj .:,.~ .........'--
:i:7
Date ':;. - I ~
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired. The City of Roseville City Center Task force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Center
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1.
Are there specific uses or activities that you and rour organization feel should be
included in the City Center: (Please list)
2.
Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included ,in the 'ty t:enter: (Please list) " . ',' ,'" ,
S) tJ..r"tll~ X.......t.- ~11.0"h.:'- 5,!..WL( tJo'w.....V lUll', r:~
/ /' 'I <.'" 5 " . -H- ';, . .\ (, ., ,u-( c.+ t.Uc/c.[ i ,- ,{ ...J ;-'. 'Ccr.'"
No r~U;-C( . \.l-(Cc-<,!' ! ' '
Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
3.
-----~-._.
What is their specific need?
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or activities have to be available?
5.
:/~ t.C e../,,(. :'l_':- ~
1
Cl.
A-UL)(~0C1.tu.~j; ',.-:. C.lJ cl.o /"u:..+ . +: ~- ) c:.... La~_Q._ ..Lc c.:. c.c,.'-~,_
.;:.....rJ ,- '1 .' ~d- L::.r-o"t !,.L-~ A." \...( (,'-o'y,..t.Cf0_~.~:
V'- fctt.k...:...~ Lee r<:f- ,-'......- {' c. . /' I '
,...f /!.j.:.-.'7 d _h o:\C'ITYCENT\questlOnna,re_05,99.doc i. L. '( (..,-':<.W c: t~1j.o''( --tI~ i,L 't-u:~,~
i.-'-'I-'-.....-{ ..( ~uc...,t ,....~ , .
, .j, 1.._ ' (t,'c s:v..t: at.JT..r.:. d' ~.....:t" c(.,~ 'I- fr::t~c; O...b< >' -,
,\ C.CVrt-tJ.-tfi.fJVo';..:tCV-I'lL~1 l~ .. ~ ...w-J Jf0 _.J ~j Sa..L/ a..1 '-fCu'S ~;'u...:f-
' , / J . . ' 'L" I Ilv~1.-u., /..... I~\..C C '~U:.) ~ (
" , L ..,,-h. . \. ('-L'f I I ~C;Z... -' . . ,- ,',.( -'.{ ,/ '
.,1.. -"- '--...,/ ,.-~,'. . I"", ':,~_~\..~' '..I 6i!_......{...._.__ .-'1_~ 'r-::-~ "._
~ '" '-- ... ~ .. . -
i'f
--
City Center Task Force
Meeting =#=10 Notes
May 20. 1999
L Call to Order: Chair Keith Wietecki called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall.
2, Present: Chair Keith Wietecki, Vice Chair Lois Sinn Lindquist, Don Anderson,
Jan Vanderwall, Perrie HeitIer, Peggy Egli, Richard Bates, Ann Hermes
Staff: Kim Way, Dennis Welsch
3. April IS meeting notes reviewed.
4. Report on Planning Commission input of the May 14,1999 meeting. Dennis
Welsch presented an overview of the comments received at the Planning
Commission meeting, The following comments were described:
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS
FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12.1999
GENERAL SUBJECT
# OF COMMENTS
1)
Mobile Home Park
Will it be purchased; future use, transit/higher density housing
Why transit?
6
3
2)
Traffic Concerns
Comer Lexington & Co. Rd C
3
3)
4)
Decline in property value
2
Parks
Future of Howard Johnson & why not include Central Park
3
5)
~osts
Short and/or long tenn
5
6)
Process
Zoning/Comp PlanfTiming (need more time & info)/site size
14
{A6\
~e
i>~
o
Page 1 of 5
Task Force make-up/participationlinform city-wide area
3
7)
Opposed (no other expression other than "opposed")
2
Chair Wietecki suggested the boundary of the planning district be changed
based on comments from the Planning Commission. He suggested excluding
the mobile home park and all the area east of Oxford Street.
Jan Vanderwall asked for details of the Burlington Northern rail abandonment.
Chair Wietecki explained the route west of Roseville that ~~uld be abandoned
in 1999. Jan Vanderwall asked ifthe rail line was a "use" that should be included
at this time.
Don Anderson explained that transit lines are not viable in Roseville, but rather
should be used as an addition to the pathway system.
Motion: Don Anderson moved, seconded by Lois Sinn Lindquist to amend
the boundary of the City Center Planning District to eliminate the mobile
home park and the land east of Oxford Street.
Lois Sinn Lindquist stated the Task Force was attempting to stay broad-
create an outer limit - to allow for more flexibility.
Jan Vanderwall noted that not much commercial development is planned
within the City Center District. A general discussion of business zoning ensued.
Tom Johnson asked if the railroad right-of-way would be retained in the district
(yes ).
Peggy Egli asked why Howard Johnson was included, but Central Park was not
included. (The north edge and corner access of Central Park were included).
She said the reason to include the parks was not clear. Howard Johnson Park
was to be connected to the City Center. The impacts of indoor vs outdoor parks
must be discussed and understood.
Ann Hermes asked if the mobile home park tenants have any protection from
new uses proposed by new owners of the nine acres. (There is no protection of
the mobile home area, currently guided for residential, while the zoning is B-3
business use).
Motion carred 8-1(Hermes)
Dennis Welsch explained the reasons for the City Center Plan based on Vista
2000, the Comprehensive Plans of 1994 and 1998. the Infrastructure Committee
recommendations of 1998 and the Resident Satisfaction Survey of May. 1998.
Page 2 of 5
-
-
5. Public Comments:
Delores Stewart, Park View Condominiums, explained that there was confusion
over the planning process, the mailings, and the language in the notices.
Roseville should be a homey area with convenience, family area.
Bill Lanski, Dellwood Avenue, wants small town atmosphere and keep Howard
Johnson Park as a small play area. The City does not need an indoor facility or
the added parking. He prefers the open area; not more buildings and open
space. Use the Central Park ball fields as a building site..Jnclude walkways and
upgrade the improvements already in the park.
Mike Hermes, 2796 Galtier, noted that Roseville's identity has not changed,
Unkept yards and lawns keeps property values down. A new building will
increase property values.
Eugene Bohnamen, Lexington Avenue, expressed concern about his house and
the impact on it. He explained that his property would be placed in limbo with
a new City Center District. There is noise and traffic from Lexington Avenue
already. Put the City Center in Centre Pointe. Leave me/my property alone.
Joe Matchinowski, 2690 Oxford, stated that the City Center District should only
be on land not already used. Use Central Park ball fields for building. Use empty
lots on Woodhill. Use land that belongs to Roseville.
AI Sands, 2612 AIdine N, said that Central Park should be induded. Why wasn't
it included. Why was land north of Wood hill included (VFW, Veterans Park,
Shopping Strip)? Why look out 40 years; why not 5 to 10 years? Demonstrate
the need for new land before buying additional property. Take out land north of
Woodhill. Consider the Arona site.
George Warner, Huron Street, noted there was no connection between City
Center and Howard Johnson, which should be left as is. In the City Center
District, the coordination and delivery of city/government services is the only
important use. There is too much traffic, disperse the uses. Keep the library
where it is. Do not cramp the site with too much recreation. Use Lexington and
B site as a recreation site.
Pat Sajak, Parkview Terrace, said she prefers open space. Central Park does
connect neighborhoods and should be protected as open space.
Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn, supports all development. Roseville belongs to all
people. Does the plan represent the needs of all of Roseville?He opposes
spending public money without a referendum. When the plan is complete, the
Task Force must come to the people with a plan for approval (referendum). The
Oval is an example of a project without a referendum. This was a "railroad job".
Page 3 of 5
Joan Jacobson, Oxford Street, said the parks should be left as is. Roseville should
be quiet. Go to the shopping centers and place the Center there.
Shelly Lonski, Dellwood Avenue, asked if the Fire Station was too small for
current equipment. Regarding the phone survey, when and where was it done.
Where would parking be accommodated for new uses? Parking and traffic are
too much for the area and Howard Johnson should remain open space. How can
parks be kept as open space? Can smaller areas be designated for uses, such as
license bureau? Could the improvements be in different parts of Roseville?
(Spread throughout the City).
John Kysylyczyn, 3083 North Victoria, stated that excessively high taxes are also
detrimental. He expressed concern about the information sent to residents. He
was concerned with the quality of and process for gathering public comment.
Ann Berry,1059Woodhill Drive, asked ifthere was a rush to complete the
project? No priorities have been established. There is a huge waste of central
space for public works. Why are some parks included, other not included.
Where would the garage go? Will there be focus groups? Why is no one from
the Task Force from the neighborhood? There is plenty of retail in the
neighborhood that is empty. Why more? Why is there reference to religion and
"public housing"? The pathways concept is more than 20 years old and it is not
opposed.
Five minute break.
AI Kehr, 988 County Road D, provided historical background on need for
planners and architects. The 4O-year!planning horizon is too large. He opposed
the Oval; it does not pay for itself. There is only a need for one downtown -
Rosedale. There is no need for "stone corners". The City needs professional
planners like John Shardlow and Howard Dahlgren.
George Reiling, Heinel Drive, noted that he has land which he intends to
develop.
Becky Sorlein, Dellwood Avenue, expressed support for retaining the open space
and parks.
The parks should not be taken away. The neighborhood is turning over with
small children. Do not put retail in the City Center because there are other
vacancy spaces.
Mildred Roesch, 1000 Woodhill, asked for details regarding the residency of the
members of the Task Force. She questioned the cost of the Task Force study,
She felt the draft report was not professional. Use only the land that the City
owns, but do not develop the parks.
Page 4 of 5
, .
Don Deutch, 1781 Dellwood, recommends no encroachment in existing parks.
Plan well in the future by using the space already owned.
Lois Hopp, Parkview Terrace, expressed concern ~bout the government decision
process and eminent domain. The activityartd communityc.enters do not
always make money. Leave the parks as they are, do not develop them. What
plans are there for the land west of Oxford. She opposed traffic from
Community Center on Oxford. She wants to be informed. (Her first notice went
to Cambridge, MN). '
-.. . -
George Warner stated the definition of the district is important. This is a
railroaded project.
Delores Ford, Dellwood, felt there should be no buildings on the corner. The
vision has come too late for a city center, Do not develop HowardJohnson. The
uses should be spread throughout the city.
Sue Synestegard, Dellwood Avenue, recommended no development in Howard
Johnson Park. She recornmended no retail because it added traffic to Woodhill.
More retail would impact the neighborhood.
Don Anderson, Chair of Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission, stated he
shared the concern that Howard Johnson Park is not developable or replaceable.
If the ball parks in Central Park were proposed as City Center there would be a
major impact. The Arona Community Center should be replaced and moved to
the City Center. The City Center may have a lack of parking space for big events,
Cooperative efforts with other cities and the school district may help relieve the
space needs.
Chair Keith Wietecki read letters into the record from:
Bruce and Jean Urman, Woodhill Joan Goepert, Woodhill
Wallace Herren, RoseviIle Band Wendell Brown
Jan Vanderwall suggested emergency shelter and service center be added for the
government center.
Dick Houck said the audience was not yet representative of the R.oseville
residents consensus.
AI Kehr said he has contacted over 2000 voters. The results are 180 degrees
from the 1998 phone survey. .
No further comments were offered.
The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m..
Q:\CITYCENT\TASK FORCE NOTES_05.20.99.doc
Page 5 of 5
-- ----
Comments relative to City Center Complex
Don Anderson, Chairman, Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission
May 20, 1999
The Parks and Recreation Commission has taken no formal position on the work of the City
Center Task Force. I have informed them of our actions on a regular basis, as has Bob
Bierscheid, Director of Parks and Recreation.
However, we have on many occasions reiterated the need to replace the Activity Center on
Arona and to move the activities located therein elsewhere. The deteriorating condition of the
roof has led to mold, damp floors. In addition the heating system af.'ld other facilities need
renovation and, or replacement. As one who has spent a great deal of time in the building, I
can attest to these needs.
As early as August, 1994, we have discussed the possible replacement. While we haven't
been asked to formally recommend replacement we have concurred on the action of the City
Council in 1996 to solicit bids from developers for redevelopment of this site, leaving a portion
for a neighborhood park. Bids were received but no action was taken by the Council. The
Commission feels that selling the Arona site, and using the proceeds from this sale to move
the activities to the Skating Center site would be in the best interests of the community.
The community room, walking track, and in part, the fitness room, added to the Skating Center
as Phase" reffect partly shifting of some of these activities. We have discussed, a Phase III
potential that would move the remaining meeting rooms, storage areas and Parks and
Recreation offices to an addition attached North of the present structure, curving slightly
around the oval.
One major concern we have had in moving more recreational activities to the City Center site
is the lack of adequate parking. Normally, parking can accommodate the nightly (and daily)
activities, but parking becomes very tight when major events occur at the Skating Center-
the Oval, Ice Arena and Community Room. Fortunately, one season's experience seems to
indicate that existing parking will work.
As far as other recreational and community activities being located on the site, we have had
little or no discussion. The Parks and Recreation Commission has strongly supported
cooperation with the School District - the shared Elementary School gyms and the Gymnastic
Center at the High School being examples. We have looked at other nearby community
centers and have felt that pursing cooperative efforts, either with those communities, the
school district or other public bodies, given the space constraints maybe the better route to
travel. Some of the community and recreational activities proposed by the Task Force for the
City Center site would fall into this ca~egory.
In conclusion, I would reiterate the feeling of the Parks and Recreation Commission that top
priority be given to replacing the Activity Center on Arona, with top consideration given to
moving the activities to a Phase III site attached to the Skating Center. This would be the most
cost effective solution for Roseville.
~ ~
Wallace J Herron
1464 Clarmar Ln
Aoseville MN 55113
v /-1'~
... .. .... '
Name I..~ f\. \ \ ,...( ::
cln OF ROSEVILLE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
'i u ! ",', Organizatio~ "'ore,,=, "''' <<."e,
-.
"
.~\I'.iC .'
Address I L-j r; q ("! u.. ( ,.,. ., (
:.......... 1\ ....~
Phone ,:);:;- ( . (; -:;";::'., i Cf f; I
Your Roseville Property Location '4 {pi.: ',; P f: .... ' .. (
~.
Date S I ) ~ ; ~ ;:1
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired. The City of Roseville City Center Task Force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Center
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should be
included in the City Center: (Please list)
Rosl/..~;\\"- CO>(').,...,.".......,-'I b\'o..l"\~rH'~~( c... I",~--,r~r\,.. d--,~'rJ".,\ '...<-., .::~,,& ?\'n.".....
hO<1\~, 1=-", .1"< W~~Ioc:",; b""-,,,,\. Y~\....~...rS(\.\
2. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included in the City Center: (Please list)
3. Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
1-\ Wo"'-'\o-.. h~ ""'c'\.. i( th..Q, C6rr..'. .'''' , I:.{:....,,~ (I'),,\..~ c,,,,,',('
C.O\"TI..,-,\)..... ':....,..,~-I.... ;\-c \-.o'rt\~, 1:' wc-.J. /). \"":::10"', .",........ '.,,:..,' ,\ '.':'( "'1,, "~ U'<'.<,
WIiiiNJ their s,uUh Pi'-"
:::.G....'\ c.-,...'~,l"""
r-t.-~I- i': .;.........x':" ........ tr. _W......('4.Y ~~.,
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the' City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or actiVities have to be available?
, ' ',W.(I"~~)' \.
O::lmYY\\>. ,",,""r'-,I Bu.."'\ '{"'~.....'!.~yS"'-\ c.:(<:,' '(Y")I'\f'\ e.\i~<; -r.'~ (".:'1'\" If, I\i../,~(\
~',) b'" ':".,r...,\(,\:."" -{~ t~ 'n.....,\. C~'. ~\I..II....,a.~W.''!.K.
5. Other comments: (Feel free to provide additional comments)
-1'"\....1. f:>.mf'\.,:, 'I""'-~I>...'I n
Ge"..." b .... '...... -o! .. 0{ ,\.
'> ,-T. "11-........ '(2, /I. "':\
C;::\ c..-i ......~ ( {\. \ f::t:.. \ ~
0..... -'<;...... W. <.t .s. (\..
,...J '. ~,i\,<. c,. 'P A
..n......: ( ; <.
,.,t+~ .:-,(",.}.,......~
5.1 <;......"r<'-. -\ \.-.....d...
\..,'-~y Q fV"CS'\~pl,,:
(CT"t'-"1"'~ Got'" '.....,)It. "
Q:\CITYCENT\questionnaire_05,99.doc
~.O\~
s''\
4.
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
ISEE7:11;?;;~~~
~z;t;S:~4
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
,I cb-, ~I ~ ~ tiu,
~
2.
3.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? _ . ,
J ~ ~ de:::!! 1 ~ ~~,~
- 4\:.. ~__~ Y">Vl----
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~-'~~Hk~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUFSrIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
TO: City Center Task Force
Members of Roseville City Council
RE: Response To Request For Input
DATE: May 17, 1999
Since we are snowbirds, I have only been to one meeting and watched a couple of
replays on cable. My thoughts, with that limited background, are:
1, Start with a much smaller area. Begin with the immediate needs of city government
and clearly define those. Avoid duplication of services or space already available at
schools, churches and other public buildings. I don't believe any of the land within the
zone is for sale now and it would seem wiser to me to acquire it as it becomes
available-- if the need is there. If the intent is to rezone this land and thereby restrict
what is done with it hereafter, I think the City should be dealing up front with the
current owners now.
2. I've served on a long range planning committee and know the frustration because
few have the ability to see the world a year from now---Iet alone 20 or 40 years. When
ever you print brainstorming ideas, as I believe some of these must have been, it
sounds like "pie in the sky" and is bound to stir the ire of many, Mention library and of
course people are going to react because of the beautiful facility we have, which is
located right where research said it should be.
3. So many of the things mentioned for the center should be private enterprise. I don't
believe it is the business of the City to compete with the other malls.
4. I personally feel that Roseville is too large and diverse for a city center as proposed.
The government buildings yes, but not all the other.
5. Lastly---I got the perception, from the first presentation I heard by the Consultant,
that a lot of planning had gone into this project by someone long before the task fOrce
was formerly introduced. I might be alone in this thought, but it may need some
clarification.
Joan Goepfert
963 Woodhill Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
~.(\- <\ 01
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
Name ;t//..? n (I; .I I
A).~'~'I."
.
Organization
Address; I}- 3
IV,.
r:~, 7'f
.7.
Phone {. 5- ( 977 C; (It:' r
Your Roseville Property Location 5"' c: '>1. (.. .. S &' h.~ .--
Date :5 - - /7 - ;/ 9'
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired. The City of Roseville City Center Task Force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Cenier
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should be
included in the City ~enter: (Please list)
'S.....J I ""' 70-' , ,.. 'J hi.;;' (
,/ :;
2. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included in the City Center: (Please list) ( I
,,;? 1-," S Ii- ~ ~ h t' ('I <." ',"" <... L'...J <' - I (.to e' ..'., I ~~ c,
3. Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
What is their specific need?
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or activities have to be available?
5.
Other comments: (Feel free to provide additional. comments)
~(. '" If 1&.0: -, ' ....,... -i> ~. r'( I ~
CV "" j I ( 11 / t: '" '" . , ("'K' ,'-f:,....
t/
~ <.'c ,; ." I, r~
Q:\ CITYCE", 'T\questionnaire_OS.99,doc
-
.
City Center Task Force
Meeting =#=10 Notes
May 20. 1999
1. Call to Order: Chair Keith Wietecki called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall.
2. Present: Chair Keith Wietecki, Vice Chair Lois Sinn Lindquist, Don Anderson,
Jan Vanderwall, Perrie Heitler, Peggy Egli, Richard Bates, Ann Hermes
Staff: Kim Way, Dennis Welsch
3. April 15 meeting notes reviewed.
4, Report on Planning Commission input of the May 14,1999 meeting. Dennis
Welsch presented an overview of the comments received at the Planning
Commission meeting. The following comments were described:
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS
FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12,1999
GENERAL SUBJECT
# OF COMMENTS
1)
Mobile Home Park
Will it be purchased; future use, transit/higher density housing
Why transit?
6
3
2)
Traffic Concerns
Corner Lexington & Co. Rd C
3
3)
4)
Decline in property value
2
Parks
Future of Howard Johnson & why not include Central Park
3
5)
Costs
Short and/or long term
5
6)
Process
Zoning/Comp Plan/Timing (need more time & info)fsite size
14
Page 1 of 5
--------
- -----
.t1 b) , 0!\
?jIV
Task Force make-up/participation/inform city-wide area
3
7)
Opposed (no other expression other than "opposed")
2
Chair Wietecki suggested the boundary of the planning district be changed
based on comrnents from the Planning Commission. He suggested excluding
the mobile home park and all the area east of Oxford Street.
Jan Vanderwall asked for details of the Burlington Northern rail abandonment.
Chair Wietecki explained the route west of Roseville that would be abandoned
in 1999. Jan Vanderwall asked ifthe rail line was a "use" that should be included
at this time.
Don Anderson explained that transit lines are not viable in Roseville, but rather
should be used as an addition to the pathway system.
Motion: Don Anderson moved, seconded by Lois Sinn Lindquist to amend
the boundary of the City Center Planning District to eliminate the mobile
home park and the land east of Oxford Street.
Lois Sinn Lindquist stated the Task Force was attempting to stay broad -
create an outer limit - to allow for more flexibility.
Jan Vanderwall noted that not much commercial development is planned
within the City Center District. A general discussion of business zoning ensued.
Tom Johnson asked if the railroad right-of-way would be retained in the district
(yes ).
Peggy Egli asked why Howard Johnson was included, but Central Park was not
included. (The north edge and comer access of Central Park were included).
She said the reason to include the parks was not clear. Howard Johnson Park
was to be connected to the City Center. The impacts of indoor vs outdoor parks
must be discussed and understood.
Ann Hermes asked if the mobile home park tenants have any protection from
new uses proposed by new owners of the nine acres. (There is no protection of
the mobile home area, currently guided for residential, while the zoning is B-3
business use),
Motion carred 8-1(Hermes)
Dennis Welsch explained the reasons for the City Center Plan based on Vista
2000, the Comprehensive Plans of 1994 and 1998, the Infrastructure Committee
recommendations of 1998 and the Resident Satisfaction Survey of May, 1998,
Page 2 of 5
-
-
5. Public Comments:
Delores Stewart, Park View Condominiums, explained that there was confusion
over the planning process, the mailings, and the language in the notices.
Roseville should be a homey area with convenience, family area.
Bill Lanski, Dellwood Avenue, wants small town atmosphere and keep Howard
Johnson Park as a small play area. The City does not need an indoor facility or
the added parking, He prefers the open area; not more buildings and open
space. Use the Central Park ball fields as a building site. Include walkways and
upgrade the improvements already in the park.
Mike Hermes, 2796 Galtier, noted that Roseville's identity has not changed.
Unkept yards and lawns keeps property values down. A new building will
increase property values.
Eugene Bohnamen, Lexington Avenue, expressed concern about his house and
the impact on it, He explained that his property would be placed in limbo with
a new City Center District. There is noise and traffic from Lexington Avenue
already, Put the City Center in Centre Pointe. Leave me/my property alone.
Joe Matchinowski, 2690 Oxford, stated that the City Center District should only
be on land not already used, Use Central Park ball fields for building. Use empty
lots on Woodhill. Use land that belongs to Roseville.
AI Sands, 2612 AIdine N, said that Central Park should be included. Why wasn't
it included. Why was land north of Wood hill included (VFW, Veterans Park,
Shopping Strip)? Why look out 40 years; why not 5 to 10 years? Demonstrate
the need for new land before buying additional property. Take out land north of
WoodhilL Consider the Arona site.
George Warner, Huron Street, noted there was no connection between City
Center and Howard Johnson, which should be left as is. In the City Center
District, the coordination and delivery of city/government services is the only
important use. There is too much traffic, disperse the uses. Keep the library
where it is. Do not cramp the site with too much recreation. Use Lexington and
B site as a recreation site.
Pat Sajak. Parkview Terrace, said she prefers open space. Central Park does
connect neighborhoods and should be protected as open space.
Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn, supports all development, Roseville belongs to all
people. Does the plan represent the needs of all of Roseville? He opposes
spending public money without a referendum. When the plan is complete, the
Task Force must come to the people with a plan for approval (referendum). The
Oval is an example of a project without a referendum. This was a "railroad job".
Page 3 of 5
Joan Jacobson, Oxford Street, said the parks should be left as is. Roseville should
be quiet. Go to the shopping centers and place the Center there.
Shelly Lonski, Dellwood Avenue, asked if the Fire Station was too small for
current equipment. Regarding the phone survey, when and where was it done.
Where would parking be accommodated for new uses? Parking and traffic are
too much for the area and Howard Johnson should remain open space, How can
parks be kept as open space? Can smaller areas be designated for uses, such as
license bureau? Could the improvements be in different parts of Roseville?
(Spread throughout the City).
John Kysylyczyn, 3083 North Victoria, stated that excessively high taxes are also
detrimental. He expressed concern about the information sent to residents. He
was concerned with the quality of and process for gathering public comment.
Ann Berry, 1059Woodhill Drive, asked ifthere was a rush to complete the
project? No priorities have been established. There is a huge waste of central
space for public works, Why are some parks included, other not included.
Where would the garage go? Will there be focus groups? Why is no one from
the Task Force from the neighborhood? There is plenty of retail in the
neighborhood that is empty. Why more? Why is there reference to religion and
"public housing"? The pathways concept is more than 20 years old and it is not
opposed.
Five minute break.
Al Kehr, 988 County Road D, provided historical background on need for
planners and architects, The 40-year planning horizon is too large. He opposed
the Oval; it does not pay for itself. There is only a need for one downtown -
Rosedale. There is no need for "stone corners". The City needs professional
planners like John Shardlow and Howard Dahlgren,
George Reiling, Heinel Drive, noted that he has land which he intends to
develop.
Becky Sorlein, Dellwood Avenue, expressed support for retaining the open space
and parks.
The parks should not be taken away. The neighborhood is turning over with
small children. Do not put retail in the City Center because there are other
vacancy spaces.
Mildred Roesch, 1000 Woodhill, asked for details regarding the residency of the
members of the Task Force. She questioned the cost of the Task Force study,
She felt the draft report was not professional. Use only the land that the City
owns, but do not develop the parks.
Page 4 of 5
-
Don Deutch, 1781 Dellwood, recommends no encroachment in existing parks.
Plan well in the future by using the space already owned.
Lois Hopp, Parkview Terrace, expressed concern about the government decision
process and eminent domain. The activity and community centers do not
always make money. Leave the parks as they are, do not develop them. What
plans are there for the land west of Oxford. She opposed traffic from
Community Center on Oxford. She wants to be informed. (Her first notice went
to Cambridge, MN).
George Warner stated the definition of the district is important. This is a
railroaded project.
Delores Ford, Dellwood, felt there should be no buildings on the corner. The
vision has come too late for a city center. Do not develop Howard Johnson. The
uses should be spread throughout the city.
Sue Synestegard, Dellwood Avenue, recommended no development in Howard
Johnson Park. She recommended no retail because it added traffic to Woodhill.
More retail would impact the neighborhood.
Don Anderson, Chair of Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission, stated he
shared the concern that Howard Johnson Park is not developable or replaceable.
If the ball parks in Central Park were proposed as City Center there would be a
major impact. The Arona Community Center should be replaced and moved to
the City Center. The City Center may have a lack of parking space for big events.
Cooperative efforts with other cities and the school district may help relieve the
space needs,
Chair Keith Wietecki read letters into the record from:
Bruce and Jean Urman, Woodhill Joan Goepert, Woodhill
Wallace Herren, Rosevil1e Band Wendell Brown
Jan Vanderwall suggested emergency shelter and service center be added for the
government center,
Dick Houck said the audience was not yet representative of the Roseville
residents consensus.
AI Kehr said he has contacted over 2000 voters. The results are 180 degrees
from the 1998 phone survey,
No further comments were offered.
The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m..
Q:\CITYCENT\ TASK FORCE NOTES_05.20.99,doc
Page 5 of 5
Comments relative to City Center Complex
Don Anderson, Chairman, Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission
May 20,1999
The Parks and Recreation Commission has taken no formal position on the work of the City
Center Task Force. I have informed them of our actions on a regular basis, as has Bob
Bierscheid, Director of Parks and Recreation.
However, we have on many occasions reiterated the need to replace the Activity Center on
Arona and to move the activities located therein elsewhere. The deteriorating condition of the
roof has led to mold, damp floors. In addition the heating system and other facilities need
renovation and, or replacement. As one who has spent a great deal of time in the building, I
can attest to these needs.
As early as August, 1994, we have discussed the possible replacement. While we haven't
been asked to formally recommend replacement we have concurred on the action of the City
Council in 1996 to solicit bids from developers for redevelopment of this site, leaving a portion
for a neighborhood park, Bids were received but no action was taken by the Council. The
Commission feels that selling the Arona site, and using the proceeds from this sale to move
the activities to the Skating Center site would be in the best interests of the community.
The community room, walking track, and in part, the fitness room, added to the Skating Center
as Phase II reflect partly shifting of some of these activities. We have discussed, a Phase III
potential that would move the remaining meeting rooms, storage areas and Parks and
Recreation offices to an addition attached North of the present structure, curving slightly
around the oval.
One major concern we have had in moving more recreational activities to the City Center site
is the lack of adequate parking. Normally, parking can accommodate the nightly (and daily)
activities, but parking becomes very tight when major events occur at the Skating Center-
the Oval, Ice Arena and Community Room. Fortunately, one season's experience seems to
indicate that existing parking will work.
As far as other recreational and community activities being located on the site, we have had
little or no discussion. The Parks and Recreation Commission has strongly supported
cooperation with the School District - the shared Elementary School gyms and the Gymnastic
Center at the High School being examples. We have looked at other nearby community
centers and have felt that pursing cooperative efforts, either with those communities, the
school district or other public bodies, given the space constraints maybe the better route to
travel. Some of the community and recreational activities proposed by the Task Force for the
City Center site would fall into this category.
In conclusion, I would reiterate the feeling of the Parks and Recreation Commission that top
priority be given to replacing the Activity Center on Arona, with top consideration given to
moving the activities to a Phase III site attached to the Skating Center. This would be the most
cost effective solution for Roseville.
-
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTfiR SOUND? /:? '
Y~$. .z- //,K-c. ~hL ~qe",? ,.?-4a/ ~t:J.s'~ v/ /Ic;
/s S-/~t?"'c, /;-'13 ~he. )d~o, ~ Ci' (""/'7 ("e-~,/~r.
/' ./
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
6t:> Ve"~,Ht el'f./ I r'~c ,,-C'q.,.!/t1I<1. t1'",/c:.,. ~/'~ /He. -'?r".
-h'''c.. err- /j I ,
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY? ',/
Yt!~. 4 //Ace,4' 4 . f ~1<1'
/$- tIT.s ; AIt~OY~~/ '25 /k
,
/~..~ ~ ~4/j
C;5 (~/~
C01-fCy~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
y~.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
f ~h/rlk ,?~c, H4PY'C re-..., ~,q't1'z.er,L,'t1'''?
- ~~e. be//er.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
WHAT ARE THE MEETING P.~OM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
, n l'"\~Ov CA.
J'~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
S<<.~ "'*-j.b..J. w~.~ ~~U)~ W~J ~'A. -It; s"':~.
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE? "
~.tl4r.J.3~H~S/~4J~J1:MI
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF ID~NTITY? ,
~~~ ~~::;;~"1ir-l<J. +A.J~
, I
3.
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
~.,,~'~ .3 '
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOG~THER? " " " , ' '"'
~<<- ~~~..~.... ~ ,.JL~~:~
-~ ~A, ij:S&~,", . k," (ts '" '.,:S I ~,'. . "~:h~JId ;c..)
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~.... ~ 4a..f fvt
6.
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING p.aOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
J);JJ- ~ !fJrlt.. f<:r..-J.., ~ · " ^~
~ ~ ~~~~f:G(1 HOI k" , .' / (]'V
$fs ~~ -to . II ~~J:, ~ ,uN*l,v 61' h~ ~ ~ ~ . .' . ,
d.t.., u..f-r; ''If ~iloI1.tr ftJ ..Jt., ~ iI~ W~ * tifk 0,. ~ ,1)",l1'l'i(, ·
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
f"b
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
~ ~_ I -\ ~.. Lu--L ~ /} ~ ()f)/Yo.~
. \
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~()
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
bin
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
--1JD
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
ltJ...l ~ ~ ~
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
~l.tN-- ;..0 ~ o-P~ ~ ~
~o ~(~~ ~~~ "
0;::-
Q:\CITYCENT\C/TY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
t/
, I "
v\../ "-
~# ,_ "'1~. f_ ,:
I iI\..G:.. " :- j ,
I .:
!If If:' - {r(;'c:>
r '::> ," ..
{".. '-+
./ ( ._ [.'-.1,.../ '
;....-- -- .
~Lt'~I'''''''''~ ': ~_~. \- r-
: C,c..', t..
~..J.'f l..)" r
.:.."} \- ...',"--
r t' Lc:ts/c.'Ll
I ~
tJ~~ \ t"\.~
.~,-,:,Cl<..,,-_,.',
f" .. ~ "7 ( ,
r-\..:....-i t. (. v -'-.
j../-
-,.'........
~' ( ,-/..5"0..2, (-:r.. -,..-r
I..A.. ....... '. '" -1.,'.1
,,:..tJyt II L,c'i - )(.:/'(.'.L.-'~
,;.~-,-- . .. :: Sl.J-'
J '
/5.:: (:,.,-'
v
i
CUU'I...(.',:;/i
..-/
-
'~.:_( '.l.' '.~
'-!rL '(.
... , I
,
4/-(
/.
.:.......
'. L c_ '-. '- ,~-
i
;::; .:::
~.,.... r
-i-~~; '_.__
~ll,..i ..~: ,""
.: --:.
- ~.- . .,'
"1.
{, 1,,1 C;
( ,:"'t
.
r '_j.ttl Lt.;. ,_..:', '_ ,-,"J. ~/; '~i..-.
::,I:.,-.~. .-:_/]..:.. ;~-."...~ ~'- ".~!
" >
~.,. .. --
........ ~.
i,i..-otf' ..
'. .. '- .
~(
~~;',~~~/;C-('~ '
!
._._.r .,/
-1
,-'
( ...-'
\- -'
'-
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ~ INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
-1d.d:::. ~ Yrv ~ - ..J) ~ty- ~ tL ~
2.
THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
, ~~~,
3.
DO ~~R OF IDENTITY?
4. '!!!E:ANTAND/ORNEED~F,~~. ,,,-0hn-
~-~1::: ~~ . ~~
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
_ '-11~ }T~~
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING r.~OM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INlTrf OBEMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
71~-L
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
W L--- '-It L-r.-& U?UL "
4.
DO WE WANT AND~ED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? !
;VO
,
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENT~F T~REAT!ON CENTER?
~ ~/ .Jf ;'
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING P-00M COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
U).L ~~ ;;L
.
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
6.
Mimiesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
-5
t?
3.
4.
5.
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING LaOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? . J} . ,l.1f) /,
~~:ii/.1 t1iVLC-{i4(l
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ~ I~T;tt PREMI)l: OFtI~t~ER SO~? ;
~ {J :j~' 4 iJV'liI t-1'JI l!MrfJ~
C /1,1 rI
2.
THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
.I
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF ID711;}"? /
::J: ~Ot~tt f~..('{' ~/{ l-l~~cf,
4.
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
'r.f- /~ /Jl/lot/ trip). eccV'lo l.M..v of .rCj) ('t
-' (
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCBNT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
4.
5.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
HI~ THE FOCUS Of A CITY CENTER ~HOULD'1W.
. ~ ... I i'J . , F.-....,L or (r-(.-<-r-.-L.-
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETH ?
Il/tJi .
tL?! (x:jl1vt~
~ c!7J -a' ;1
J' ~/MJM(
--z,'. , ':.t- ~ WHA~ THE COMPONENTS OF THE Rl!CREATION ~I!NTBR? * A J-
rn~~fJf1L ~~~~;, ?M.FiA.-"><Ll0u'~
. , ~ ,. 11 7M-M~
. ,.~~.J..A-' .,
7. WHAT ARE mE ME~ING ROC:".~ COMPONENTS OF A .
F~~r ~~ti!i.. ..~~U
~ '~~r Iu 1M - ~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENI'ER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED ~ SENSE OF PLACE? ,. -tf-- ~
, . ~~~cq- C7~~ t~ L~~'r'-
-<i3 ,:n~ ~~,-,LLv,"'i,,;;t: . ..'- ]5 - trNf'wd/~C{ ~?b' L-,J
, J d L'.
, '{.J, -'-"-/
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEEp A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
S~C~OGETHER? " ,
, -,,'J ~f-{,t,,~./ t.tf.; M..::{" (1l~J-r' 10 ,-it-( c:U2t
.::..:::t-~. <- ~
a
WHAT ARE THE CO~9~S OF 'fHE ~REAT~ON CENTER?
W v.-<U W '\(.u~ '
~ 'f..
.'. t ~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM ~OMPONENTS OF A
CJ~~Ldf c~~
'0; 'F "';(j i;;, <W-'-1<tuQ "''''] . . .
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc .
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS :rHE IN! IAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOl.!NDl
, ','J:' /;f-. . u!.d'~ A..'-t:?, ,~
(, , ./ ,. -r-'; 'LI ..;/;-t,- (;:''.,."
~ .2~G~- '(~ /
WHAT D~ YOU THI~ TilE FOCUS OF A. CI1Y C~NTtR ~~~ULD BE~~__
cL; ~~A.->'I J 40 -,/1~CZ:;""- ~L-..-\ ~~ V>\, J-f.}c"'1
, ~~
y
ENTER OF IDENTITY? '.~. M " 1 . Q
. 1 N ' ./... ld ;1t{.L{ 0.. / / L-U..--<:--' ,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
af-Y./v
'I7~ 14 /JA'... -ryt~ ~ fc'~' . j.;t' :.." /VJJC o/~1f'--1
'J-.- l'U-'r~J:-~-....r
-
.
6.
7.
MinDesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESEQUESTION8:
1.
IS THE INITIAL,PREMI~E OF C~~ CENTER SOUNDj '.
ft/j, . r; i-y'L '" rA. ~ 0 ~~. ~ 4 ~
~+- ~-:'/.1";r-a-... ~,()... (\~o-..d..~ r['",
ifJ~ F/~, U-
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
ftJ:::--- :""f' ~~ s:J;:: ~ '- ~
Y'\.-.., "", -'-\ '. .::\..- .J-._ _
2.
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDE1'i'TITY?
NB.. ~~. ~ 'J "IY-- ~
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? /
I Jf). rn (~ ~c \~ ~.~.....J. r vt'14-v-c....
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
/,/:J +- V1 ,(l..~~". ;....: .~.-,..;y JA.- ~ r
'- -,
WHAE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~ '~tA. ~ ;:~
, ~ ~ (\", r~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A '
COMM~E~ ~_. ~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
5.
6.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
--
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE Ol_CIYCENTER SOUND? . . . ~d
LY'/.I~~M!:: &1'tLd;:::i;,c,~':J,&' v
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
~ttJ-&f\.MLA-'+ If- pv<-pl:G ,~-h^i' l/Y2u/h'-~ ,
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
-nO,
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
-110 .
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SE~CESTOGETHER? I
I wiMAd k {' on ue.,., ~t-'
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
yY1u{fi-~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
SI)~J. ~tf'Jthn..o, (,tJw.jp"'-~~U ~"1" ad ~~;/J~
d.~;..... ~1Ao-/j)'-,...LILR
Q:\QTYCENT\CITY CENI'ER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc J .
j jf., ",K- rlwl- ~ ;,..1:.. ~ d t..- & (.;+>t <J j,/~{C( j t.ttil
(bYilJltiL..u1 9'1- cU t-;cuc/ J vA f - ~ It>>IC d-.,j).
Z, aUt:{; LaW ~ {5ftAGL aJ&; l~bk.7 jfYt ;;!J~cA ~ ,~, '\~..~~'~.
. , ! ''''' i fll' " 1-" ,/ /~~" .., I, . ...,.pt:-:,.f- r(j'{'i ',J'-
-
4.
, .
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
7 L. Co i 10.) f J a.-( ~<" -"""" r s tL L} O~ s hlC.e. if t..r 0 ye..,r., ""- i..C!. ~
~ It 6 (
p(.....,.,,~) '^J 'fZc-.... , ,tA- .$. ~~'7 t...._/"."/--.... jAJA .!o~e.J".I'. ~
-:r::- bz. (, eve e d~ I.t.-8 ~ 4P- tV<~rJ~ Pb....~J ,,') 101' - rQt..l....J~ ?(-"V\/
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY c:eNTER SHOULD IJE? 'j.:
c:..... <.t? ,,",,^'II. ~ ~ ...... '-AJ -I v..t.. a r e......:::f -.r ,D ~ 7'- /'c. / ,,..::::, ~ ~ ~ -c..
( I r \
of ~ r~r-J"'J f~u'ce..'\ ec\ b'-C....(bJJ(Jr
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
W~ ~& C,^Q... k +-; J .f",..t f- (,."'; ....j Ii 1- ..
2.
3.
t
k.. f.s ;.::;.
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? ,
-:::C-:-'s ~...( r-~/ I.. ,~~ (7 C~Jz~~. ~)(Jf1;"
- I \ If L 5 A 1'__ /..ti!- ~ v ~ c.....'..I.. J J c....o~~ ('e.. (c:Kc.J"~ -!;..v- Cto!. r-e..r
V'\... .
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
T- ~~ -t. (e"L\._ A-o ....re. ~D~ -It..- 7 ~~ Ov~
L, t ,.... ~'7 ~ .t-f.i!..rr ~~7 A.,) () -r)ft.J .! J'<? f'v) Ce. r
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROC:'.: COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
\..~ L L
-
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENfER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
~'^- ~e~~L:-L. 27'S1 'D~/~OoJ Sf.
6 '56- 5"5 ::s (
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
/0
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
a; .0;7" /A<?/ ~~~
3. DO WE NEED A. CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
j0
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
A1
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
Q,\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
-;;.,,17
2.
WHA~ DO ~O~ THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD ,BE?
C/ / L ( ) \ c} Ii. \, ,- ( ,f }...', (.(', ~(-l. ' ' d~\ t;.r.~
~'(', ... "LL .,. ";", (' , /,~~: A,)/ --LC- J-/7!< (cu,[7i.,'
Dbt~~~'A~~~E~oi~~~~I;~~ / iL{lc /
r "1
"--/ I C
:.-':) ;.", :{'l" If (/~.:r-/- -' {c.:.. _. ({c<. ~c: t:
/:. c" t
(1 "
\_ ' ..J:...... ... _
3.
,.- .. _.- ~-
4. DO WEW ANT AND/OR ~E~ SENSE OF ~LACE?__,
(, l>iI'--C I~--L-) i t::: )7~
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? ,'~ __
-/ ' l/,"; I ;
.9 d ;:- ",1. if.'" ,,'. "' :...! ( ..:. f..:: c t.. (f..i.:.! (f ( {. L cC {.. ( ti.. c:.. '"
- '7/ LC i /. C ~ tf L L. t/' , fA c:' .i-~,:,,- !.-~T;:-/ -I'i~rJ- ~ ...6 LC.."'<~~]
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
.....)1 Lt...i.L ((.) I.. IX Ii ',-,' I {, ' (, v t' /, .,. ( /,,' -7'-' /
Q:\CITYCENT\CitY CENTER QUESTIONNA.IRE.5.20.99doc.JOc f. ~. "U- I....~ tL I..L (., ll- .-rc? .
7'-\((./[( JL~l (;/;-;i(~.;",/ )1 t;-(:u..~ I t(jI~.lU[L''-- /nr. <1.(..
~_~"l-t
If
0>~ L-' V:'L-- - i_....t.........."....
I
--1'\j~"'V' ..;.<L. 6.. l~.-y,.......i~.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
}\ I' I
I\'L. ~
I -
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE,FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
v:- ~ -2.~ Ii ' '- . . ,-' I
~t.. ..-<'~\/,...{.~'\.. /C.:., J' t.r,..c"u, (.{'-o--1".-:-ktA.....G:..\\ )~
'11 -
..J(..~~y~~ ./~~ "') "'.-:,.:...:. -
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~ If !
,
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR !SEED A SENSE OF PLACE? .
I'~ - 'J{. AT& ',.
lL;-X .-z..t.1.;L.:J'1 ~ \ t-<... '\...<t- j.J.. v-t_LC..(.,
.:&../-1 r.-\ ../J..o:.,,~~ {ff /U A..c:"~
!
i
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
-YD
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\ClTY CENTER QUFSI'IONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
-"
2.
" , -f/\ ) ,
r::y{lA/ / I ~ (L-P
- IL)/ U "'I - ~"
~ l~) ~ L {3."ss. : j -
77~ilNKZF~CP"S ()F tCITYC~ULD~
~~~;~'~~-;~~~;t;~;rfZ~ &rckt.j.
\)
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDE~T~TY? '~ "
JO:,iL,,~~b2'f" !Leti..! u-u(f If h APAiT .~.
.A~,,(U <<<.' A-{A......I '..) ,',-
1.
3.
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SEN~;. OF PLACE? , ' _ \) ,,'
~\)cJpk:~~~':~~E~~;'~~'
~ ' , /f1'1-i/CU~ ^ .
DO WE WANT ~NEED A GOVERNMENT C NTER ~~
SERVICES TOGETHER? '} " ('
~. \?
,
, ,
~- / ,
5.
~:r j./-I
6.
THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
1j4!.:/lZj:;~ ~~f..~~1;t;~ f!~,:!~~#3 zr:~ ~
Q'\"IT~=~RL=99do<<~ . " . . ;..; f1~~,
~~~~~~~.~
,',. .~.'" ..,~, . ,. ,~, . :.': ,~;~C IA,v f q 'f ;:' A_,-~c.-I.."
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
,C~;:.t~~,J..."
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
'~~~1 .Pfr ,J~,
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
'11~. IP/l;.~tY~P+r~~<-;\~Uj ~~-:;
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? ,
_ WL~ 4/~~J w~b~,,I'~~~;
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
W.v~~~~-r.;;r~/~.
, (J
WHAT ARE THE MEETING RO<<;>~COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? r/"~
V1JL~4~1~~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND? tV 0
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
.1\:tl.~ ~* ~ ~ ~i A'L, (:)~~ ~ r/-1kr ~ ~ ~Jiiz,
~ ~~ ~~'~I.I~g4..vf-~:d,o~,-1-~~j-lo.:"
~ ~~ ~~-' ALoNE
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY? NO
~ ~ I '
Jvn.~ o:z. ~~~~~-~~j",tk~c
.......~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?NO
:v,.~,P;-~'t~~ ~?~f~1: ~-~
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? l\J 0
~~=~~~~~~'~-
'/JQ.~--_L.)~--~~'I)'""
~~~.. ~'(""
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECRE..-\TION CENTER?
~:::~r:'t~~~~!t:<~l~~
.A.J"::.,6
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
l-J~ L.)-O., .J\~..e.. JL~vt. )'L.,.w ~ ~~~ -r),.o (;) ~~ J
.;..A ~. '-.,
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
City of
nlfj
~~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~~ I f ,d~J_ 1. fdl.b-fi~./ ~~) ~~~v
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
...2~r a ~ ~II .J /
3.
DO \\TE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~.~~/~ ':z) ~~11,I{:::':::; ~-/~
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
4 t' . t
----rh..~) ~ ~ ~J ~.--<LO j ~ dN;?,J~A! c)
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? "-
'4JL ~LI.~ "Dc> ~ ~ --
6.
T~S~~!p'NC~ a-l
0" -+-/ ::'6= ~. 0 / :;:'~~rt' ..;..LO(j @ ;:.;~.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
..n \ ~ ~ -4-- . /
~~~ogl"'~, / U A~__'L,<)~
s:2.iO.-.....-~ r;o ~ ../uh CL -
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUFSI'IONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
7.
'~...u ~
-
.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~
2.
'VH~HINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHO.ULD BE?
./3 D..A'}~~.t-V-44. ~ ~~
;t.; ~ ~~__
/
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
1?~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
H~~:;~~i {!:::; '~#i~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERV1CESTOGETHER!~
~_?14,~ 4-"-- r..~.'3l ~:t[(LY'
=~OFTHE:RFATlONCENT~R?~ .
~~~~~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
~ ~~nA~ ~?>-WV/ ~~~-7
~/~~~J'~~'
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
/0 ~,
ex ~, @uld; l/Il~
Jrfj .NiJiJ / ~
&p ~-;
~~
.
5.
6.
('w", .M.d.
7.
~~~
---- ~"
City of
Rt
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP us ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CI(j CENTER SHOULD BE?
~ ~L/.J - ~ 'of- -7~, 'r~'~'/:;.)
~J t..-../ ,
DO WE NEED A C~E,R OF ENTITY?
~ $.--UL vJr.1J<-- '
3.
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
b Jnv"
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
r
I\..; ..A.W
~~ ,~
WHAT THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~TYCENTER?
~~'TY7:m~CFNf;:;:;Oi>L;::;;Zo ~ ~JL- ~wLii f~>:
or ~~.~ Q~ - /1.J ~ C~) t)" \PJtv. w"'- ~
/~J ~, C^-'\[w-J~) )rcv.lJ '...
\ ~y~
r /~ J fo~-wGA, V"~~~bN.~ A~L ,,"-0L).
~~ yL Q.V.-tU0 --,-.L~ /JAj! .",i, J"-oLj q
;1JtM;" 4f~ ~ ~ ~ ~r '0~ LL
~.J i ~ff.- t ';If'- fJ-j.tL(Yh.U~ c< 'OJ 'X
-:;~~1 or~~&L'~ J:J'~ ^~~
~~'. ,J ni ~O .
CI'~' [.t\J> .le.> [..<...L \J "-.'---U. ~ ~ / .J LW ,
~~ (\rtL~ -.- cAJJ. (i " it ~ _l<) I'~~
() .0. 0", u-P":j;:.,~ ~....,
~ :fL 1:: J.J,~.k;' r4 ~ c-.l~t vi 7L-,.-:
, f(J-,_tL, cb ~ v~E4v-J. FA"''-4' w~ ~.
v ur f~~ /yW) ,'h.q! )( -^^'<L.lJ.
-
.
I :
/ u
!
.
i >.
<II
J )
I GO
I I:
0
...
I III
..
I QI
0
110
...
'...
0
...
...
CO
CO
...
...
...
~
...
~
'"
~
~
'"
...
,..j
~
U
U
<
o,D
o,D
0'0
...
] 01
Ii
jO,
; CD I
~~f
110'
..JI
-'
~I
,....1
"'I
0'01
""I
'"
P
,..j
IoJ
...
to.
:3
<
IC
IoJ
IoJ
0>:
~
IoJ
...
IoJ
,..j
~
~
<~I
g.~i;.
. CICI -
"O~~"
vt- . ~
~,
~~
va'
'-'
P Z
IoJ ...
... P..I
~ ::1!i
:J u JOo4H
"- ... >G:
W or-.
CI) ;:& cz::: 'r)
~ "[~"-,,,
en D: W~tn<
"" = ..1..1..1
;j '" ~~;:j
I=: Q 1ise;~
::3 ~ ->0 0>: '"
Q < '" W..I~<
IoJ IIQQIa.I ""..I
... ('!1a.I H< P
g ~[)~ ~~~::J
'" II-IW "'0..1
... Q 0>: - -< <
Cl)IWQIO/Q "'''-'''...
=..IIW ...Q I.) en
o ..I Q '" :S IW =!;i! Q = "- /T, 't..
~ I=: e E Q g ~ ~ ~ : ~ ..i; ; i.' :.: \.....
0>: Q ...00>: """ "''''IW .
~ 2 ~ g ~ j ... ~ ~ ~ i ~ :'::.!jt
"'Oil- = ..1"-0 11-< . .
ox.....~.........,.Ju CLo ,/ ~ ~\
uen 8"-,,,::>::>...t:I .<1"
... IW'" <II ::> IIQ 0'1.) = = ..I ';:"
=III:IWII::UO W=U"'< . ".'
U U 0>: "':z:: IW ......:.:: 0>: 0>: ' :,: : ' " ~
...<U...Q..II.)>O:'::"-ZIO/W ~J ;:'
"- < '" ~ ,..j < < 0>: ... =:z:: ,'" : ......
o IW I&J.....I < '" 0>: IIJ.... .. .
t"'1 ,.... ,., '" ~ U) p.. p.. ...-4 Q 0 C \............'
<< << << << << << << << << << << << <<
~
t:I
o
II::
"-
t:I
z
...
Q
(&J
IIJ
en
Q
<
o
'"
P
~
...
o
..I
t:I
=
...
~
<
"-
!oJ
U
<
to.
'"
::>
'"
~
=
...
...
z
R
~
<
:<:
IoJ
Q
...
>
o
0:;
en
~
t:I
...
~
o
U
'"
o
to.
<
IoJ
'"
<
!oJ
U
<
I&.
'"
::>
'"
Q
'"
;2
'"
IoJ
o
Z
!oJ
CIO
~
<
I>-
O'
Z
...
o
z
...
~
en
IoJ
Q
...
:;-
o
'"
IoJ
~
W
'"
o
=
...
en
en
IoJ
II::
Q
C-
O
...
Ia.I
IW::>
""=
>~
0<
'"
"-<
...
,'"
o
~t;
... ...
...>
~I&.
IoJI&.
....0
0<
::3~
...<
to.
'"
IoJO
::>to.
Z
....
...
Z
[:
Q
~
c
o
....
...
." C 1\1
C.... ....
::> 1\1 U
.c ... <II
JJ ...
<II 0 c..
> c..
.... 0 1\1 <I)
....... ....
....c
... .. :2 &J
<II ... 0
~~>'Z
.... )
<II 0 to
.c C
... "'0. CC --.4
o C ...
601 CO CU :s
.... .....
UIIIIII....
.... E'QI'...
t""4.....-4..,
O,IJ ~ c::
'" 0
U
en
IoJ
~ffi
...
t:len
Z>-
...'"
8",
:;!~
Q<
o>:~
o
to.
'"
Q
15
I&.
!oJ
'"
....
~
>,.Q~nJ.,..c
..c-w..c
<< 0(, \.0 ~ ::
.. - o-J ~ ==
~;1'if NOlfJNIX:n
- V/CTO,RIA 5: ~
- // ~
~ ~ .,--
'" -'<: ~
~ .- "-
a.. ~
..: Vi ..!!
" -g
/0 " " " ;2'; ..11 .
" u ..
a.. u " " <Iz =-- Q.
""S
't:Q.:J :; "
~ ... ~ :; u
a- I
s.... :.J "
::::s z
~
+-'
U
.- ~
.l;j
00
.-
"d Q)
Q)~
00._
::s >
"d Q)
a ~
-~
~ "tf
Q) .-
~ .l;j
cIj.;!3
Q)O
~
Q)
~
u
o
+-'
~
Q)
E
Q)
u
a~
- .-
~u
(I) (I) I
.~ i3 I I
~ '0 Il[l]
~ ~ '
o.."d
8 ~ T
O::S~
u2 a: a: a:
(I) :E:E:E:E
..c= ~
+-' ::s ___-
B"d
+-' ~
~-
(I)
I~~
~..c=
I ~Q) .;!3
I -
I ~
at;;
~ (I) I
O"d'
c: a mIJ
~ ? IITIJ I
::s C,) =ERNWOODST BImERNWOOO_ST ~
g-.B BIEEffi ~. 3:
~ 00 ~ u
(1).- ~ Q
a '2 -"-'ST !i!ITIIO~. . ~
;> <I) <LJ,J."U.J ~ 1; 1; ~ t
0._ I
.2:' U URO 5 HURON 5T
. - '-" I HURON ST 1 1111 ! Tl i \ ! [ ! i I I
U: :: i!! i
CHURCHILL ST
a:::
:I:
~I
l:~~tf~;i:~i~~~
"-,I r -.' '
..f:.,..r .. .' -
I ('! , :
: ad : I I
i :1:1 0:: I 0:: I 0:: i;l'
L---i :I: I :I: I :I:
ia:1 I i 10::
1:1: I; :1:,
I , ' I ' !
a: a: 0::
== == ==
LEXlNG ONAVEN
()
:; e.~
~.a 1:
'-11"
&"'U
I _teFi,..
III _fit
! !..w
I i~!
r~j-~1ia:
III II!! () I
::. ,:I:
~ ;~I I
~I \~\
~ 0 '-----'
o
~
3:
o
Q
~
It'
~
~
o
u
"
2 I!I
.. "
E: .. ~
'j;( e II)
~ a. I::!.
~ <(
m
.f:~~
u~~
~
<
....
tJ
3
:c
~
a:::
:I:
III
:::3
&h
uo
~:e
-
.
c
~ C2
<:; a:: en -.J
"'Q)C~
:;.:: 0 ("J
'-- en;: ~
Q) C ~ 11>
... Q) C ~
en.cc::nrn
-; e 'iij ~ '
.a c.Q) (!)
j E 't.'J ~
o 0
o
~
-
k
""'"
-
cz::
~E-
:CrJJ
E-Q
~~
~z
,,-
Z
-<z
Q<
Z..J
~Q..
Oa:
=~
~E-
=z
E-~
~u
Q~
.....E-
00_
~u
<Q
~~
=00.
<~
o
=
Q..
,
!
~ ~ I'
'" Co
41 ~ '
~ l~ I
1$1
r
-.. --. -
"tJ.A$
,::i!!:"
51:
".!. :::::,:;.
,.:/'Ui..'. :'
"~j
Q::!
(' .~
.......
..:~::~.. ,;;:';'~;;.:.::".t '1()' 0 " I 1"(' .' CI I ~{ t '
'-.'\,~~ ':1110 "f- ':~ u : "->< I!:';, "~,''''~ ',~'I j"oJ. -
'~""~~~~!'~:. t UJ \, j 5 ..... \,,~ ~" I. .0(. :,'" .., I
.....:~ : ;:',' ...'~I: ~ ,,'.1 1:.' ~ : j - ,',' ~ ...... ":.;. ".: ~M~"'1S
,...~':';,. -.:".. '8\,\ ',:,Y.) .._, : " ,:~. : '7A;.''' " ; .~,:..!"': J , I
'~',:" -t4S;,' <i:: '[ '; ',..,'::,::: ';:. , '. i~"~ .," j I ':' I' ,
,.:~,~. ~:-., "I~ , I:NA10.l3S0~ pi :~" ~ ~':'I', ,I ",. ,.:', J
" '::...; ~~':...~..::. 1 I I r, .J.S I..'" ' '\~ " ::. . ,,' ...:", I · ,
~,' '" '" _..~' t ':, ,.......... ,....' .......,. ~'.\ I:' Lt. ..' I .' '; ..
"..:-, .. 'I r ': -t!:'....;;lIrin.:.riW::.':'.'I..' ') ,.:.;,' '.. ,. t p,
''''::.'~ ~:t ::.._ q.::.....~.....~~ ...,.. I ":. ......::;...'::1 I'
. t\\\ j::} _ ~:; ... ~ ::.~:~:~~.~,~,~!2 ~ .~~.~,' . ::';1S"~-:;;~'~':.""'i':;\~:0i:~~;
",," " ' , : ___,...,............ ,~ ~, C 'I f' ~ ..' I ~:: I r'
~.'\ 'j: ;:! '. :;; I Qal,Q,Vtp;!jJ' " - - , :.. ,;; I .A II';; ~;; t ,::
"~\':\ . I ~ ,!....,...,~ ';: ..... ,.. !![t " I:, J I 1;'0 · I; I. ',Ii'. .:1
.,', " ' I' ':1$'......::.,', ........,........::1 ' ,':, I ,: I I,:" ,,: I I"
'\,," I!; .. '-i:'r"'J,I~;! ..: ~ Iii t I;" :":;" ..:; 0; .:,
~:'~ :: L f)i, :- I ~ I ',I I.,' .;: I .." '" ,':: '
~~:~,.:7<;"s". ~: f. ..~,~t!; -~ , 3 ~;1: L; ~ Ii: ~ : I: ~ {! (
.~ !,:,;,;'':';;;~~'~;;'~;;;;:;'~''''_''.P' :~~:. !t:!i::::. :! l ~~il:"~ii ;'
'I, ' _ of -t. -t', I;, r -- .. : I :: ~ :: :,
: __..- .'. .'" t:,"'." ~:.. ". ~, .
\h~:~:;'::,0:'.'ViiffI:;j',,"::':':::"':'::::::"'(~,,~:.:,::,,:~jL7~k~:~:~~;":::~}:;:;:';?~:];
t'.::i ..I. .. "WIfIIiJ~' ~'~;c_. .',
I':;
:I~.~.~.~~.~.ij!:l ,1':1-: ~:
;~~iiW"~ .:, ~ !: C)'"
:,,:, ";:~ :;; ; ~" ~ .
.. CI) ..._.. .._I ::Ji" :: t. :: ::t.:.'......
1'~~;:;;~;f('"'' " ;" o~,;;;:
"",..........!. ..... ....~}~~!q!;2.j. '..~It~i..~.'.....,.....
~~,iAtf.~ ~,f '. ~~r;' .'~~r~ ..~(~ .~\ NO.J.eN/xii':' ,..
~~h:~t-;.i:~ 1::",/1, ~i' &',' \Ii
'~I~IG!... ';n, 'ii' ~ · 'i': , <\..,.\g
: ,_~,:",. '.';" filii Ii I P!!~ .
',;':J 'i/I II' 1:.,' ';i'I. , t
'~:Ij-: .l'!!'.,:,~~/ :.8 ; I:\~i ~ ~~~~'~ iii\
~~lUi~~""~ f3~l.~. \1 i
'_ -:::11/), , . IIC '6, ~: , ;!\\ !.
:::-,~iO:CJ"'*~!II'" C)i., ~,<::::::, Ii
.... "'0:' ' .1&;., Ii, ' >::...., I,
Q,..':, \,',,; '. ".,-, :1 .1 .
0': : . ..): t .. I: I ';" :.
0... ::$ /..:'~' , '3j i("', , " """ " ,.", ".
,,:.a.., J' P CJ::' .-
.~~ it\,~ ,.., , .." ,..,....... "
.' " :: ~~'.' '::;:::
.~.. ''''
i::~~r;:1., ·
.............:1". ,....... ~ :: ~ ~. ,. ::.i "I ~ "
- ~[:__~"., 0'. .. =,,'''~ ,'~ i':F. ...~ '. '.~ .' jI .'
.:~r;:::~;f::~::~::;:aMiiwH'::;:::;::::,~.:::] i: :;::I::::':~~^:\;/:'~:'i"':"'~':::::""'''''''''''':,.,~.....,; f:~:~'~'~':';:~:~"~:"~':;i~::::::~~:,:)tjj~ii~;ii'""~I'! c'l:':CfH'~
Q:: ::,.. iii :: ...:, - "~. ' "...,:: ~Q::::::
:: 0(;:~.._._...J' ST::. ::...,.8DiliIHS" .::: 1::1-';:::
n.= \L~::~',~::",.~ ~":::::;::::! ' - : !::.::.....,.,:,.:....".....",'.........,'....../ I : \~ i() ~ n 1 i!: \:
u' _1f.~.:..i1:,.,;;..,,~~...'::....;~.!; ~M :;,...........;;. I::: 5i!1::1~::i
i:\ nil:;:' ~~"':"':~!! I :~ · i~M''''''''Wli\1 r \~ \ 3!\ ::::'
: 1i': I:' "'-8... ~ "10 :: f "............................... .::: 01:..:1 ,,::
,....il. ~\i ~ lrr:~:~;;~.. ~'1)~. Ii :t ~!>." (j 'I \I.~.;.~.~.JI U! u__ \\ \\
.....,. _ I, , II '. ...)1 i "I I I ,. ,:,' i ~ :(.............tM:,..'uu..... I. ,::: " I:
',.... .... ....1."3,'. '1'1 ~o :,.......:5.........' ""
~i!;...:.;Jli.::.i : Jf";~!~J~~..1:\'.~;i\t~~~1r;,. j\ \i
.0 :i... ..' , I ....."""0 .-,." ...... .J " . ~ - .."t " . - .", ,
_ ....... ...:>'" .;: <:".rdl ~;~ '<:<~..,('>"::..~::";'~:\v: ~ ..;::/' \: \'
I "-i = J .;... . ....:>.., . ~:! # , ~/~:;:::::~ii!" ~;: \;,~ .:=:,:;::...... ii :
I,.-,~ '" ~~ELLlNc;.,,::::~ I 8': .. t::,:\ ~:: ~;:~~..:::.",::!~/::: ../'/' '''\,;
I \
; i..
.;":..,.
, "':~" ...
.'C"III1r:::, "', '"
~;: ..($;'... "
~j.1 t ::~.i:<~;::,.._.....
-. '" r; , ". .~.....
f !!:: Iii. ........'
, ;! ~ . g r
. . :!.. eii I P
· :L;...,;:~iL~ .
.. ;:31\~ ..r
:' "
....
, ,
;;.J.S" ;~ "
:....................................
, tpo'o~~~/
"
',I
I <Iz .,.
(
" ~
u
,
:1 ~
'"
~~ ~
j~
> -
" c
..~""
~ ~~
= ~ .~
;..:~~
"
~
~
:::~
~~
. ..... L()
~ (1)
~ ~
~&f
~~
~~
........~
~ a;
-..~
~5
:::~
~]
a.
ar-..g.
~~
==~
a~
o
. .....
u
r"~
o u
~ ~
.5 ~
~ >. C
~ E g:;.
~ g.~
; - >-
& ~~.
... ""'"
"-Q
,
i'" .~
....: ,
o~~
'(;oJ;;
d~,
~9
f-t~
::-
'g
~
:.-
LEXlNG ON A VE N
. :tl~~
; ... f _ sr.tiotJ tI1 01 I
----, I~..., ~:!:: I
: i i~! o:a:cf
i O!. ~ (
) I' ~~i \'W ;
, ~", I
I L 1!1 i III .. :J iffi
, ~ ~ I :>, ~ : ~I ,
'-.: .. Ii: ..., :O'!
i "" t\ ::Ii ::! 'Sl.
, ~c.. ~ 'O~
o '-
~ '-;
~ 8'~ I'
~"'1:
..,:.. f
~",o i
I
1 ':i ~
"'t:j <l>
<l>-
VJ:=
;:t :>
~ <l>
~ ~
-~
~ ...J'
<l>.~
C:.1=
c;:I t'J'}
.-
~O
~
C,)
o
....
--
"'::
~ i
~ ~
""-
;
<c~=~
ME'"
ex: i;j
N J.S 'tflHOJ.:J11I
...
i~
11<3
31
~
OJ
e~
.. ..
~o
o ..
:t'l'!
~i
0"
'"
;...,
<l>
-S
<l>
U
a~
- .-
~U
0,) <l> is
:> ~ 'I i I is
. c;j ? 1.--LLlLLLJ ~
c:......."
<l>O~' ,
.J::?-- I I
~~ i:' i I
E = T
-I' I I II
0.... 11/,
~~ II i II
-.:S t'J'}
;j
B~
.... ~
c: cfj
0,) -
E ~
~~
~.J::
0,) VJ
~~
a~
;... <l>
~~
S
ct
C")
cx:
,
t~1 :
I a)! CD I
t:
2 13
"" t:
~ t.I .
'i @ ~
... .. I:!,
~ ~
"I:t
CD
c(
C")
cx:
....
VJ
o,)-+='
:::t u
r::J" .-
iU.1=
;... VJ
iU .-
::::0
.- """
>;2
~ c:
o Q
~U
~.Q
0._
.,QU
..... '-'
U
/ Ere
fLljJ '__s
H3fEEB~ EfffBi
ffffifB~ ~
g 0
I ~~HfR 'CIIllJ'
HURONST ~
II I I I J I I
:::1
&=~
""0
~~
----------------
\
\
7---
/
,'.. ./
VICTORIA ST 1
,/
'"
'"
/'
"
~
;;:;
A
:.... ~!
<{z
~
?)
:n
Q
...,
...,
'"
3:
()
(:) 1.1/
- C
.. o..!
.! O!._ ~
GI ,E ~ '
.. C c 2
1.1/ 0 O! ....
'ii '" . ;;; Q;
.Q GI~
II? "c--.
... ~
I
.....'\
: ./
:i f[ <(
~I~ C")
. \.g cx:
; I 8
lIu
~
"
~
U
-
c==
~E-
:Cen
; --
~Q::--"
::'\
en r..6
- "wi ('., ,
;;... Z ,~
".;-'
.... Z~'
~ 7- ~:
Q ~.~,
Z~:;;i'
--, .....;j "": I
o=~i
=....., ~I
~~
~ E-c...:j
:c Z ~I
E- ~;--: r
~ U~II
Q ;;... ";::
00 t: ~I
z U ~
~ V
Q:'"
~ r_l ~
~~1:::
c:: CI'1 '"
~~~
o
~
~
I.'; .
I I'
.,;.,~'""";I!i"~'
"<~~~ff. '~"1i.,' f+
!t,:" ff".,;~~:~
< 'l,~.^ .
i '
~
q:
t-.
tl
5
:.::
~
g ~
UI Q.
QJ .8
!3 - ""
~ ~~
go!:'..
~';.',
" "
o~
~
.~
.~
~,- .
"
.,
,-'
". 4 ;~O ~.... :~
., '
. ." ~ .'
j~~.~&kr
, .. ~......~.~ .
r.,... - '.' ,- .$1,,-
".) , ' '
; -rlvzJJ:'j 0 ~ P05ev~ /I <- /5 I ~ "'J . cd- -/}",
,:. po:ss~ b j/ (f~) 0 f c! ~"-\2J Uf ~ ;'(j C\. ~ Le7d:u-: / Y) Rus ~/--i (I c--.
J: 17~ ~;J"f L" +f-o'j 0rC {ooJ(j If! cJ- I Y\cl Vt ~ l-b/-JtlrA J d'v"/j~
: 'a rd VduC1.~ forK..
-,0 '.
". .,. ."
ii;, - ,
,0, .. .":.;.' '..', ...- . .::\
. ;.
, .
. '
, "
~.. :"",. -, ......... ,-
, ' '
~Jvlax1!.\(l ( Dr; \~t..._
f'vVV~"7
IJ .' ,,-~.
nO~.;J~' t.!( -n, 0,1-:/1..
_ <c:...
1";~:'7- 5~~
(. -l.:!br
~ f;:~c(
tvorc(/
.. ,
(ou. ;...it.; Rd C
, :{-f (101.<. O~ {i/4,/y\<-. (J.-rJ.. d ,;.fll~ ..tJ~/4."'v of O:l1j .dl!<:,drd4
iAt.d l.J.wJ d ,t<1..~f.. C{.L-jo-'-;:i f-h/~~r). ~c/""f1 56Y1 !hrk_/ t1..N./. (Jr (/""]cr(.4..~
-{'S12..t(10)N~~/CI../\d c~"\~t~f1 (jY) (I")O~V".t~PI..... p!tCi4<-C.fI!-.( t/w
[it.. of LI 10 - ;<,;)'7 ~ Q/A .rlo/tv~,r <f' "l'on or lJ.rf{~ -(j,~_/./~ o)-:Olif
():~(;,&O (jtJ:~ CQ,....}-if On<rP/ I 5~ 7/3, t=vQ"",: -!AD'JJ... hJe../)Cl~. 0.. LJ<Y!'JJ-
(1" PNk. S'1'.--I4........ f.a.-u.. J {kPO.-1L5 rr.""':.(- ~J:-~, P/((l4<..,!v.y ,ht;:;. V()<()~
{ '(Oh ~i. eorl~::JU ~.11'L f4<!;k.fo(l0~bq.!JiL'0WI/lY:nu)-
IA OLv' oPt" I '- lJ '.1.1' .
&c.~ir{ td {(t'. fJ1111.J11 - '\i~t.l" o~ ~ 9?P~ pt~i(,.o//)){JY).
~ tJYL-{)Cn3. ~ .,: J3eJl~' 9>dlf>'""'<-1-
___- F--," "1/-- rl,j/l-\6C-t{-.:;)
O\.'~ ~
,-" "~____,_?ot{ - q~'-{4
. '..,.....----:T-..'.:J>-;".~...-'-.-'
f"~'
;.:'\: j-,
. ... , ~
~.., ,~
, I~
0/7. )c
~~',~=--
---------- ---..-.----~-~ -. ---
-.....
, ,
. "y;
-: ~-'
, .
.---. .~...._"'~..--..,....,...--~._-
~,.....~'-'--~'------. "~~~_. .~{Jic~;,.."".-'-,.
"'-,.,."...~
.f
.i
,
. ..: \- I~'
/
4.
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~;/f:~~~/t~-- ~
~zT;t;~~~~
2.
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
,J ~. ~J ~ AvU- ~u,
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? _ . _
J~ c:- ~:::) 1 ~~~~,/~
- .:\:. ~L.--~ ~ "
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~-'~~H.k~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTlONNAIRE.5,20.99doc.doc
_~""W": Walbce-:i Herron
:~. 1464 Clarmar Ln
<: ' ' . Roseville MN 55113
v /"./~
Name ~~ f'\.\ \ r" -:. -:
cln OF ROSEVILLE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
fh " c ,.. organizatio\,: cO'. cr.\=, '" R", > ",
"
-:.0) r. i(
Address I /.../ r; ~I c: I(\.' r'" ,\ (
~.;,).... ("'\ ...:-
Phone ~=; I - (; -:;,~, \ 'i;; I
Your Roseville Property Location /[fI~: '.:... r': (,
,
t'".. \.
Date S ! ) q / ~ ::'
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired. The City of Roseville City Center Task Force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Center
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should be
included in the City Center: (Please list)
RDS<C-J~\\~ c..o"'''''''''^-'''\-~I h<_'<'\~ 'rl~" ~r c... p,'...".....rI" d.~, 'J".'\ {'''-<-' . , ..::~'"'~ ~n"'H...,
ho"",",, ~O( I -r< w"'~Ioc:\'j b",->,.,\ ....<Ck,:;"r,S"'1
2. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included in the City Center: (Please list)
3. Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
j...\ W ou..-\a.-.. h~ Y'I\(.... ; (t''''-R, (Dr".',,'..., ""1 I~,(, ,..,,\ ('~,.\A c.,-,' ~.
C.O~'('t'\~~.'-'" I':"V~.\X.,' :\'"< ~.,.......c:..J:' Wo0;)~ \.....:,[-:-:, '''':('''~ '''''o.:-':'\. . Gi ,t'''1''~ .,'j.. . u'r...-r,
WI'iiiif"'h toIMIir Ii' iT' J:! i P' - f 11
-c..G.....\ ~""""t\.t...r. r~:-,t ~ ~ ~""'.;r.:' ......~ -.0..... (" -_'t ':""',
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or activities have to be available?
, """(I''''~'1 \.
CamrY\\'\Y\,-1:'-! 13v.."A 1~"-e.,,-ySo....\ v.J~ 'fYi:"\f\ ~1J1:.<; T'~ t..;Q,,\,. "''''~{\
~'~J t><< f' "r.... \ If,\:-"" -{\:,> ",I...", he....'\. O'"'~. ".\I-''''''1(LW.:<r,I(<
5.
Other comments: (Feel free to provide additional comments)
--I"'r-..L (4f"<'\p......', 'I"......~"'-\ ("'q c;::\ c.~.,.,..,. ('" \ (-'\:" 'l ('.) :,~. ,\<. (" '(,' A
Cu.-"'- 'c,~ '",",,,,,-t,\. 0,", -'<I.-.. w.<,t 5.,\.~ --'\r...,C ;<.
';',~ ~ 11-.___ \'~6.,,,;\ CO.....C..f\"\ ",r. ',yO," ,','t+-... _rl.r.J.c.....,i\....
<;'/,,\;..,""'" ~\......~
\...~""YQ mQS\ \=\c,pl,,:
Q:\CITYCENT\questionnaire_05.99,doc
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ~ INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~~~~- ~~ly:'~ a~
2.
THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
, ~~~.
3.
DO ~~~ROF IDENTITY?
4.
u.. &f->>7-
~~,
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
_ '-1t~ }r~'
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING r.~OM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q,\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITW!5REMlSE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
71tr-JAL
3.
DO WE NEED A CEN1'ER OF IDENTITY?
W L- '-AM Af2 fJ-xJL"
4.
DO WEWANT AN~ED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? I
/VO
.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENWF T~REAT!ON CENTER?
~ J..R/ ~:t: '"
6.
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING P.00M COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
u)~ ~/ ;;L
.
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
~ ~
3. DO
4.
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOG THER? 0 f1 '
-- "'4W II I? tv" I (,; , !) if .Al t
- fJt(C7~71}12.1
WHAT ARE THE cotO?!l:-S F '!f!E ~CRBATION CENTER?
'~' ;V7J (f ic4A_,
6.
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING 'G\)OM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? ~1 . t ~ It
Q(+: '( IV-v ? ~,
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
City of
RI~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE I~T~_ PREMIY': OF CI;vl C~ER SO~? rI
~ ~ p e.l ~ f 4 II ... I /I I/f!.j I f!M u.s:
c1ur/t'
2.
WHAT DO YOU ;:I~ THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
Co v, .s a If Q..... (!){ W .t nul/' t f f
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTI1]r? I
.:r: kOt~tt f~'.{'fl ~If lIt~,'/!. '
4.
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
_J::: .(. ,-+- IIJ 0 0 t/ u/ e J. e c- (; lt1 t? l.AA. r 0 ( .f Cfl (t!
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
City of
R4~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INIyREMISE.OF CITY CENTER SOUN~ ffi -,t. .
(f~A-" ~ cr 0. -to. 41LU.fL ." f~/~{.cl1fJ1#1
J &LI'-4 ~ /J J~~/ ~ t1 Cif'C-c dP>1V"<".M3- ,7
wpAT DO ~OilNJ' THE FOCUS 01' A CITY CENTER ~HOULD,B~l'
~'!1::. _ C:r/ - 22l~1)~' FkJ- ~ &<M"J-
2.
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
f4-
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETH ?
II/oi l{ .
7.
. " ~ t!h}-J..A-'
WHAT ARE THE ME~ING ROC~.~ COMPONENTS OF A
:~fZ2'r (k~ri!i~~U
1,.' ~~f' ~/<A - Ct4-
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ,THE INI IAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOIJNDi
I eo, ~' 1\ ~, } J!~<k'"12:., . '-€:
(, , .' J J
, L~ .~~
WHAT DO YOU THINK TH~FO~~ t;~:~IT~~ ~H~ULD BE? )
C L; /'~"'(.-Y\ < <lO -,/1 ~CZ;;,^- C~t..'"'"'\ -/^-t' VJ\, J-f)c"i
, ~
1
DO WE NEED A ~ENTER OF IDENTITY? '.-1-
J;tA.<~jLl Me.d:j' V..!i;7\{;:< U .~
( "". '
/, ....,....... ..'
2.
3.
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? " -tf- ~
. ~-r<..Act:r C'o~ ?r- U;~-t~
-<i3 .m-U ~ ~UV~-k.h(r: -' 7 j -- ~ t/Ut-II k t1 r:J!;!Y;L-rJ
. ,J ~1 r~-f..-(/
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEEp A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES OGETHER? " ,
. " HI), / ~JJ:; M~ fttL-GJ-f' 10 .1L< i<-2t
-=-=:t-OC' {., ~
o
WHATARETHECO~9~SOFTHE
W ' . \A.<U.. ~),'cU~
~
5.
6.
, <:"I
- r;r.. Ir ~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~UNITY CENTE~r . " JJ r A --4
J. ~~ fW!.~Jf C~ ~ rJ- t<'v>
0.", - ~ ,ff:;-. wY- (~ iMAl..z /
Q:\CITYCENf\CITY CENfER QUESTIONNAIRRS.20.99doc.doc .
Tl~ ~ vVr\- ~V~4 ~ r~
\.J-.- fLJ-~r~J:-~'-f
.
a +' ~ f\AJI'- .() .r.~1f^-r
, :::}/\ /7 V"
-
-
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS ~~~ ~NIT1f :~MI~E ~~ ~~~ C~E~~,UNDk ~ ~,
~.j... S:-:/GJ--r'" ~ 0<-_ (\~(l...-.~~.w-",^- r[',,-.
rP~ F/ c:~,
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
P~_J -./-1 /'" ,
',,_ (_ ~_....., ~,V'-.. :J.../>..A.,,^-^- s:...;:;:: ~. a- ~
~,h--u I'"\,./-." (~) c.~.__
2.
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
No.. ~~. ~- ~ ,) V(Y- ~
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? J
I/o. rn (~~ ~ ~,.#...J. vYVh..-c...
. -, 1
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
li'J +- n ,Q.-<::-P./..:~.-r;>:" )'.!\.- ~ I
- \.. -,
6.
WHA~ COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~.Ve..L ~o..... ~ ~~
, ~~ (' ~
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMVNI~E% ~. ~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENfER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. CENTER SOUND?
);' .
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
--4D ~ ~ I'V\,L~./+ Ii- pV<-1> I; C ,yr-..a. f) ^(' I/Y2 ~ 1-1/ - ~
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
?li/ ,
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
-170.
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERV}C1ES TOGETHER? . I
.L::.. ' JiJillA--ld k (" c>n ueh~r-
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
VY1K{fi-~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CONUd~TYCENTER?
5/Jl.t+.J. O'f'J~. tt.J'rY\jrz- ~hU /()'L~J-iJ' a J ~i.A;p~
d~;t"\. Y/A.........(j)/-u41
/,;;~:aTY;::u..J;::i:"'~r1 be- &- ~;~ o Ah.U 5 f..Jj
(OYtfJiduui 9<>-- dt ~Icl.k( /; vA f - ~ lou/C J-~),
~ aVt(; L~ kit ~ {5fua /2uC1.: lv..bk.7 bfft :;;!J~VL ~ -~I t'V-~'~'
# .J., I V1 L. .4 t1 r, " h' 0./ 1/1 /,/ (., ,~.., / ,/ J , '). yf, r-"/. f r ()\"'" . _ ),;-
-
.
4.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
7 t.- c.. ~ ....) t J a-l ~"t,. -""; ~ C2... J' & ~ s h1C..e. ;I 40 ye....r:> 0... L..<?- ~
~ If {
D{.........'A\ \j ~,c;;..".., 1#..-65... ~~l7 otL..'Vt~ )....IA H>va.r~~..I'.
I . , {, r .. - ~ \
"]:::.. be () Etvet e dt!.J I.oot..8 CL 4P- ~/!:"J~ fb....~J ;S /"11- r~.J~ ?{-.vt.J
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHoULD 8E? '1.'
i.....<..>..v\'111. ~~ 1~...v-1vJG. j r~~ i';;h/j>~~ ~ ~-<.
o.(. ~ r~r) "" j fe....i'u ~ c~ '\ ~ b'-t...'l J (Jf
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
W~ ~c. OoAQ.. Le h J ~ f- I' v; "'j \; 1- .
2.
3.
A SENSE OF PLACE?
r
I
~fs N
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERV1CESTOGETHER? ,
~:'s "1...( t-~l I.. ,~~ (7 C~Jz<!!~. ~)(JH';'"
- I) 'j,('" .S It. 1'-- c,Je. \ v ~ c..-. , .. I p S J L-..o--...A-~ re.. (~u.::r~ ~ Ce T~
.".. vt.. .
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
T '^~~ {... (~'LA. ",-""oAr... ~;').......7 1L...."1 72....e. Ov.......,(
L r ""~"7 ~ t-krr ~'-"";7 Ac) () -r)<Z.j ~ J"C?rv) C.e r
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROC~.: COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
I....~ L L
~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAlRE.5.20.99doc.doc
~.... ~E'....~"-L. 27"8f 'j)~/C<-UDoJ Sf.
6'56- 55 :s r
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
M
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
ctj .0/74<?/ &1;77
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
j0
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
~
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
-ft..,17
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
C. ,/ '1 I ' " ' ) \ , - ( . '-'!' . 'L .' f..,.,
i / I [ l. I (/ d.. \., I , ,,' l..." ti.': I. " I t,l \, ";'-'
/(, ,: &l,L ",...! l', //'~:/,,',..cr J/7!-.:." ((<..-Crt<-
I ,/ I (" I' I,'
DbL~NEE~1A'~~~E~ol~D~~;I~~~ J 'Ll(/(- :',,'
r ..,
'-/ I '[
:.,'!, i.'.Z.l/ /'(C.l~.:r-:/--- ~'{LC -(ic< -:,,~t
DO WE WANT AND/OR ~E~ SENSE ~
( ~ if 11""C i;:J.. -' / c:: )7~ --
...<_ -/2....:.' t.
0:' \._1 ,/'1:..1.......-.... _
i
3.
4.
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?,.,
2J (Ll') /{ 7.7,\ .,'"1,<
- 'TI L ( i f C ~ d L L ,v. I: " ,
{ {, i
6.
. [, ....:>, r. ' 'f)'Ii'. ....!-ll.,
,J Ct' <1, " ,~/ -"-i-..;// cL.~'~~',~ (f /L;L l(" ~ tlL .~
IcD -'---',.... ." 111-1-2.. "r,,- -l <.,"'-"L/,i'..::.:r-'1'
/ \.-.J
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
__)/ U_i,(..LL ,j ~. f:!l Ii ......" f I. '(. II t';;" {' /- ~'7--' /
Q:\CITYCENT\cifY CENTER QUESTIONNIJRE.5.20.99doc.Jocl,L '. '. (f'-. L ,:... d. C.L {' L Cl.-<! '
, ~ [' /,' / . //,. \ . f, {!-J
7- L L ( I l.l i ~1 i?t c.~../ h b-l ...u..:- .. tV) ZJ.u(( (. ':!.cJ...C
'f-' I ',i
-A.;._i.'-")L-<.. f>>t'~'(;;'~- (,"-,v\....
-..-,J" 1'.......'V'1 A t (i /_/' ;~,
J .~V-' .-J.....t.-" _"...(;., T -/
!:.c'.,." \
_ '~. t"~ , .~
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~ ./. I
L\ C ~
I
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE.FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
,l -<~!f~ ~ A~;to'.~/f"';'..1V~'C ({'-o~~k2u tc:,,\~ r
x .~..I-0.....'\..'^-.;J /_) ") ""',.-:..:...::. "
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
----^ If !
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE? ,
{ '~ . '.d{. ~ T G: " .
l..;-X J..t '\.;L:.J.'1 f:",.\ K.. . C<t-. J.J.. u~L.G:-\-'
A...:...::-l (_\ /~I,~~ [11 jU.A ..c:"'>:
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
-YO
5.
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
7.
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
2.
/....! ~ ,) 11), )
~~~ I I.(~
'"11/7 //;} />0.... ~
In - -; ,J L /3." s s ' ' CU/ V - "l/'./
~ YOU THINK THE FOCpS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE? -?
ijJ,:::j;!;';~~/;'Gtp:,; !::1:(~jt-.j -
DO)VE NEED A ~ENTER O~ I~E~T~TY~ . , ~
c3 ~~ r7h19-t1-r. .ff'-V',-li) (/4 IT h
.~AU) <<<) (!? A~~IJ ~.. .i ).:,.(v.J '. \
~
A<<-<6 0,
3.
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENS~ OF PLACE? .' _ \) ;,'
~ ~ ~~~ d-~~ CV ~l"LG
-_Ii p~ -.u -, -. · -r -4~,,- ;;fl: , . ~)
~'~a)~ ' ci /1)YA/'L/:
DO WE WANT ~EED A GOVERNMENT CENTER ~ifif1(i'L .
SERVICES TOGETHER? \ 'j " ('
"" ,?
/ I'. <
,
THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
5.
6.
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~u]uTYCENTER?
1jL~f!::L :~f};~~1;t:;f!~';/;;<>it::! zr:~-<
Q:\CITYCENT. \CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc. "/fl 'r) _
. .Jz.# cuJU zt-v .' [.1 ~ vW I i~-<./tR~
I~ ~ ~ ~~4.' 7iJ1'qbf ;J}t. of J~~~
~,fr '/.-)~. - -
./ f. ,'<-11 ,0' c.:'i ' 1?'N~,__(j_0"~.~L-A..-L2-?~(j j/0J/ ! 1 i 8' .~~~k'
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
, a ~ .:;;( ~ -#IA-'--<--L '
2.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
r IJ ,'...;' ~ (~.l
': ~~-J ~ ~.
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
-n/~. &U.e. ,~v ~~ ~~"_P-;'~q /YU~":
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
5.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? I
_ WL~ 'l/~~) u/~k~,Y'~~~-:
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
W.)/~~~~-r;:r~(~,
, ()
WHAT ARE THE MEETING RO~~'-..COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER? r/~r
WL/~~l~~
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
..
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND? tV 0
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
.l\ ~~ -d ~ j,.;, ~ xl" (.)~ J A,f- 'f'k- ~ ~ 4-.ik.,
~~~~~~~\1;;~~A-cjJ'-<,=
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY? NO
~~;z,f~~~tr:1i,~~!k:k~~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?/'JO
M.~~;::&:~::: ~f~f~1; (JC)-~
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? NO
kwr~~~~~~^~
~~ ~ L..)~ ~JVu. ~~jJ6c2
~~~,
6. WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~~~~t&Jt~!~.t,:t~;;:~
.A..A> ~
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
1-J~ ~).Q .J\~--e.. ~~.ct- VL..-w.:va ~ ~ -r I.o (.) ~ ~
~ I'kw.
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
~-.:(_! f ~~....L f'o..h-fJI./ ~H~) ~~~~
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
.1~r a Q ~ Q .J /
3. DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
~.,,~~:~~~d) ~~'{~~~,/~
4. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
~ r .. (
--rh~.: } ~ GU -P>-c~ J) ~~ j fnJ ~.~ 0 )
5. DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? \. '
'-:n, ~ urrz-:F D" Ylc-r ~ '-
6.
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
t.~::::)~:J;~~~, ~
aJ
7. WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
~~FJJ~~ r;;-__'r;~)~ ~...u~
O....~ltJU ~ -PtIJ.hCL._ .
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
-
.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS THE INITIAL PREMISE OF CITY CENTER SOUND?
'1i,.,
2.
WHAT ~HINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY, CENTER SHO,ULD BE?
p~ G:s..A'}~~LIl1lZ. -:t' ~~
;t.; ~ ~~->
/
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
1?~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
{;~~";/; ~A~:I ~ '~4~~~~
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER:+ A //, /J "
~_--.~~. ~ ~tl..Y
WHAT ARE T~~ OF THE :CREATION CENTER? .
~-~~~~~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~~TYCENTER?
~~"J~~'~)~~~
~~~~~~.
I f
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
. fa~.
eX I/f!7 i rJJuld; lUG
J(fJ ~/~
~~7
~~
5.
6.
(~-- ~
7,
~~J~
---~"
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
LX n,l.'v-c..L( .
c~'-'-
2.
CENTER SHOULD BE?
~ '+- :t . ~'>.,6-:J
3.
DO WE NEED A CENTE;R OF
~ s.A..~ ~'1J"'--
4.
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
h JffiJ"-
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITH ALL
SERVICES TOGETHER?
cr
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF T
N-LL
1VJ...,w
-00 ke- ,~ .
WHAT THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER?
(j2 ~TY~ITY~CFNf;:;:;IO~I~ ~~ >>d- ~J.ri f ~>c~
"f"" ~~,4 CK~ - fLJ t10 C~) D", '\P..JrLo. I;J-L 0-<
f~UJ-J ~ CA~J )~~ .
- " , '
r f~ct f\M~' ~nN.~ /H-v,- "'"j, .
~~, yL. ~1-CU0 ..LvL~ ~/O(A~jJ r~/L ~2 .'~<.(J/~ q
/UA;.~U~~ ~~~ {~~-L
~i ~~ l: k ~j'~~ ~~vJ"
-~~=10C.lw:t:lz :~~
~7'. . ~ Oi -r D.
O'D' L./0 .{.o lA-c \.J N--LL J.-. f~ i .J cW ,
t1r-0'-A (1rC\~ ..... otLJ. 3;' I' t ~ -,Co /~J--
(; ,0. 0" ,~J;:.-, ~. _
~ ~ i; dJ'/kQ-.ub:, 1: 1:4 ~ ),;_'iJi"J." 0f 'Jil~ L
i ~<'~J.~tL ~ v7[; -4~ rcc"", -- w~ "..-I 7
.~ Uo ~ 4W) ''NJ1h J.",JJJ.
TO: City Center Task Force
Members of Roseville City Council
RE: Response To Request For Input
DATE: May 17, 1999
Since we are snowbirds, I have only been to one meeting and watched a couple of
replays on cable. My thoughts, with that limited background, are:
1. Start with a much smaller area. Begin with the immediate needs of city government
and clearly define those. Avoid duplication of services or space already available at
schools, churches and other public buildings. I don't believe any of the land within the
zone is for sale now and it would seem wiser to me to acquire it as it becomes
available-- if the need is there. If the intent is to rezone this land and thereby restrict
what is done with it hereafter, I think the City should be dealing up front with the
current owners now.
2. I've served on a long range planning committee and know the frustration because
few have the ability to see the world a year from now---Iet alone 20 or 40 years. When
ever you print brainstorming ideas, as I believe some of these must have been, it
sounds like "pie in the sky" and is bound to stir the ire of many. Mention library and of
course people are going to react because of the beautiful facility we have, which is
located right where research said it should be.
3. So many of the things mentioned for the center should be private enterprise. I don't
believe it is the business of the City to compete with the other malls.
4. I personally feel that Roseville is too large and diverse for a city center as proposed.
The government buildings yes, but not all the other.
5. Lastly---I got the perception, from the first presentation I heard by the Consultant,
that a lot of planning had gone into this project by someone long before the task fOrce
was formerly introduced. I might be alone in this thought, but it may need some
clarification.
Joan Goepfert
963 Woodhill Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
<7 S'I ,1!\9\
CITY OF ROSEVlllE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
Name t//..?"h (./.; .I I ;9 ).. ~' ~ 'h,
,
Address ; 7.J 3 IV,.
Organization
c~, 7'f
./.
Phone 65'/ L/77 c; (/{,:' r
Your Roseville Property Location '5" co >>t (.. t.., f t, h c .~
Date j - - /7 - 7' f
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired. The City of Roseville City Center Task Force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Center
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should be
included in the City ~enter: (Please list)
<), \,.;../ , ..... .,..., · ... '} .d., - (
./ y -.
2. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included in the City Center: (Please list) II
l) 1.1t.:. S ~ : ~ h 1;1 cl ~ ~ <... ~'..J .. - I ( ..L e' ..'.~ I (.1 (.
3. Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
What is their specific need?
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or activities have to be available?
5.
Other comments: (Feel free to provide additional com~ents)
dT;,... I( I .." -, ' ,'...)0- .;> tf.)o-.., I ~'
CV toJ ~ If /1 / t;:. ......... .
V'
ti; .:c o. I, f I.
Q:\CITYCE1I.'T\questionnaire_OS.99.doc
-
.
f~ 3 \\9
~
ELLERBE BECKET
~
May 14, 1999
Mr. Dennis Welsch, Director
Community Development Department
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Re: Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Commission No.: 7491.9820.00.00
Kim N. Way
Vice President
Urban Design
Director
Subject: Invoices L003 and X003
Dear Dennis:
800 laSalle
Avenue
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
Telephone:
612.376.2026
Facsim ile:
612.376.2552
E-mail: Kim _ Way@
ellerbebecket.com
Please find enclosed Ellerbe Becket's Invoices L003 and X003, dated May 14, 1999 in the
amount of $6,698.29 (Professional Fees) and $91.76(Reimbursable Charges), for the
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy. These invoices include
time and expenses through May 8, 1999 for time spent in preparation and Task Force
Meeting #9, meetings with staff, preparation of the City Center Concept Alternatives and
ongoing project review and management.
Please note that we have now exceeded our Phase I contract amount by $3,919.00. All
professional time spent on the project will be billed on an hourly basis plus reimbursable
expenses, until a new contract is agreed. The $3,919.00 plus any additional professional
time since May 8, 1999 will be billed during the next billing cycle in June.
"
If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
.
y ~/t1~
"ix ~u,ew ~"
m N. Way, Vice President
ban Design Director
c. Michelle Rothwell
__I
<S~ ~.
E& ~.
--
)~\~
ELLE'R.BE BECKET
"
Architects Engineers Planners
800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis, MN USA 55402-2014
Remit to:
Ellerbe Becket
NW 8400
P.O. Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485-8400
Invoice
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MR STEVEN R SARKOZY CITY MANAGER
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Invoice # 7491982000-L003
Invoice Date: 05/14/1999
Invoice Amount: $6,698.29
Terms: NET 30
Due Date: 06/13/1999
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Summary Invoice
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CITY CENTER Project 7491.9820.00.00
Contract Amount: 4,800.00
Amount Billed to Date:
$44,800.00
DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE
Through 05/08/1999
$4,246.92 X 2.50
LESS AMOUNT OVER CEILING:
$10,617.29
($3,919.00)
AMOUNT DUE AND NOW PAYABLE
$6,698.29 \V
Olf--\i
r'^ \P\q
lD\~
~L '
1~
r-tJ~ .
A service charge ot 1,5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum permissible by law) will
be payable on any past due account
ELLERBE BECKET
. " ~
ELLERBE BECKET, INC,
Detail Schedule
Invoice # 7491982000-L003
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CITY CENTER Project 7491.9820.00.00
Dept Phase Employee ID & Name
302001 5710-MP 7276 - Rothwell, Michelle
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102023 5710-03 1750 - Eyberg, Donald Theodor
102028 5710-03 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-03 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim Nonnan
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE HOURS
Current
Hrs
Timesheet Comments
1.00
38.00
14.00
2.00
28.50
2.50
2.00
4.00
12.00
2.00
2.00
12.00
4.00
1.00
125.00
Task Force Meeting # 8
Task Force Meeting # 8
Page 1
~
ELLERBE BECKET
,"
Architects Engineers Planners
800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis. MN USA 55402~2014
Remit to:
Ellerbe Becket
NW 8400
P.O. Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485-8400
Invoice
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MR STEVEN R SARKOZY CITY MANAGER
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Invoice # 7491982000-X003
Invoice Date: 05/14/1999
Invoice Amount: $91.76
Terms: NET 30
Due Date: 06/13/1999
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Summary Invoice
EXPENSES - CITY CENTER Project 7491.9820.00.99
Amount Billed to Date:
$727.59
Total Travel:
Total Reproduction:
Total Miscellaneous:
Total Reim~ursable Charges:
$48.03
$24.23
$19.50
$91.76
AMOUNT DUE AND NOW PAYABLE
$91.76
A service charge ot 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum permissible by law) will
be payable on any past due account
ELLERBE BECKET
,
Invoice # 7491982000-X003
1 ~.
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Detail Schedule
EXPENSES - CITY CENTER Project 7491.9820.00.99
Vendor ID & Name
08464 - WAY, KIM
Direct Meals
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
Direct Travel
Total Dollars Transaction Description
$4.53 1999-03-08 Meals
$4.53
$7.00 1999-03-08 Parking I Taxi I Bu
$6.50 1999-03-08 Mise. Other
$1.00 1999-03-16 Parking I Taxi I Bu
$6.50 1999-03-16 Mise - Other
$7.50 1999-03-18 Parking I Taxi / Bu
$8.00 1999-04-22 Parking / Taxi / Bu
$7.00 1999-04-15 Parking / Taxi / Bu
Total Travel:
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Reproduction Inside
Total Reproduction:
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY. KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
Direct Misc
$43.50
$48.03
$2.82 Sets Plot Bond
$5.64 Sets Plot Bond
$3.38 ERS Sets Plot Bond 12/31/98
$5.63 ERS Sets Plot Bond 2/15/99
$6.76 ERS Sets Plot Bond 2128/99
$24.23
$24.23
$6.50 1999-03-18 Mise - Other
$6.50 1999-04-15 Mise - Other
$6.50 1999-04-22 Mise - Other
Total Miscellaneous:
Total Reimbursable Charges:
$19.50
$19.50
$91.76
Page 1
.
June 8, 1998
Mr. Terry Kayser
Grants and Loan Manager
Office of Local Assistance
Metropolitan Council
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634
RE: Planning Grant #SG97157, City of Roseville
Dear Terry:
/(tt)
Attached is the exc pt from the minutes of the May 26, 1998 City Council meeting
allocating the Pia ing Grant #SG970157 for $7,670 to the City Center Planning
Proceess. Note at the City will be matching the funds and the entire project (Phase I)
will exceed $ , . Ellerbe-Becket, through Bryan Carlson and Kim Way, have begun
~e{ the Phase I work, ~ ~ ~C&u ~ t\-, l.!E,oOl). ~ ~
As more information becomes available, we will forward copies for your records.
Sincerely,
Dennis P. Welsch 490-2232
Communitiy Development Director
Attachments: Ellerbe Becket Planning Proposal
Excerpt of minutes: City Council meeting of May 26, 1998
)(c... P{ 0 \ \C\.
Q:\GRANTS\CITYCENT.WPD
'"
CitY- of
~SBVfbbE
Minnesota
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113
651.490.2232 fax: 651.490.2931 http://www.ci.roseville,mn.us
May 12,1999
Dear Comrnunity Leader:
The members of the Roseville City Center Task Force would like to invite you to their
next regular meeting on Thursday, May 20,1999, at 6:30 p.m" in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall.
The 13-member citizen Task Force was appointed by the City Council in August, 1998
to assist in determining the City Center needs study area for the next 20 to 40 years.
The Task Force has identified three primary uses: government center; community
center-meeting space; and, recreation center. As a leading member of our community,
the Task Force would like to request that you share your thoughts regarding City
Center joint needs and potential. Are there specific ideas or features that should be
considered? Are there special groups who should be considered?
Since part of the discussion for the City Center Complex deals with issues of meeting
spaces and recreation, your perspective on the use of this site now and for the next 20
to 40 years will help the Task Force determine the need and timing for various
components.
Attached is a copy of the Task Force proposal and the uses proposed within the
District,
If you cannot attend the meeting, I have attached a short survey that you can return to
the Community Development Department.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
-tidiu LUlehkeit'-,)
Keith Wietecki
Chair, City Center Task Force
Attachment: Task Force Proposal; District Survey
Q:\CITYCENT\invitation_05.20.99.doc
CA~
7''(V'
'.
CITY OF ROSEVlllE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
Name
Organization
Address
Phone
Your Roseville Property Location
Date
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired, The City of Roseville City Center Task Force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Center
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should be
included in the City Center: (Please list)
2. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included in the City Center: (Please list)
3. Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
What is their specific need?
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or activities have to be available?
5. Other comments: (Feel free to provide additional comments)
Q:\CITYCENT\questionnaire_OS.99.doc
--DRAFT -(04/22/99)
City Center District
The City of Roseville adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, attaching an
implementation strategy to create a master plan for a city center to be located generally
around the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road "C".
The City Council created a citizen task force in 1998 with a charge to define the city center
concept, identify the community needs, and more specifically locate the district. The City
of Roseville and a Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Planning Grant provided funds
for this task force study.
In May, 1999, the Task Force completed phase one of the study approving and
recommending adoption of the purpose, market/users, uses, and location of a City Center
District.
PURPOSE OF DISTRICT:
The purpose of the City Center District is to create a centrally located area within
Roseville with a unique sense of community, a gathering place with social intimacy; a
destination which focuses on community participation and meetings, recreation,
government services, and may have complementary educational, retail and housing uses.
MARKET AND ANTICIPATED USERS:
The market and users for this district are residents of Roseville, the adjacent communities and the
regional, national, and world-wide users of the specialized services offered within the district.
PLANNED USES WITHIN DISTRICT:
The planned public and privately owned uses foreseen within this district are envisioned to be a:
. source of pride
. communal gathering place; a hub of Roseville community activity for all ages
. center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
. locale for the development of mental and physical health
. venue for government, education, cultural, and sport activities
. marketplace for complementary services and goods
. intergenerational residential living of varied styles
I
~
CATEGORIES OF VISION, IDEAS, SPECIFIC USES:
I. Uses will be both indoor and outdoor.
2. City support services (roads, paths, parks, utilities, and safety) will be an integral
part of the design.
3. Operational/maintenance features will be designed with efficiency and
functionality.
4. Emphasis will be placed on tone, character, sense of place, ambiance.
5. There will be both active and passive areas
6. Design will include expansion flexibility
7. The site will be a "site for all seasons", featuring seasonal events.
8. The public and private sectors will playa role in the design, financing and
construction either through collaborative work or partnerships.
9. Efficiency, durability, and longevity will be a part of all design.
Examples of specific uses identified for the City Center include the following:
1. Government Center
Updated fire/police facility; updated government complex - state, city, county;
government center schools; county service center
2. Community Center
Meeting rooms; teen center; service center; multi-purpose rooms; child care facilities;
volunteer organization spaces; performance theatre; seminar theater; art/history center;
home/garden education facility; continuing education community center; Transit Village
- a major transit facility, possibly Light Rail or Commuter Rail; conference facility;
solarium; storage space for center organizations; religious facility; CTV, city, cable
system; public access studio; satellite postal service; Mini-Conference Center; gallery
area; neighborhood promotion; massage center; community nurselhealth services;
kitchen! reception area; technology center - internet access library; charter schools
3. Recreation Center
Outdoor facilities; amphitheater; indoor swimming pool; indoor play area; indoor play
area and park; indoor tennis, park and recreation center offices; climbing wall, outdoor
track; basketball/volleyball gym; child play area; craft castle or room; private recreation
area; putting greens;
4. Complementary Retail
Food service/restaurants; neighborhood retail; kiosk/cart vendors; beauty/ barber shops;
service-retail; home office service center
5. Complementary Housing
Mixed housing types for all ages and life styles;
2
--
6. Other Uses and Themes
Street level mixed use area; design that blurs distinction between indoor and outdoor;
specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; pathways between the facilities; land mark;
carefully planned parking facilities; a safe place to be; pathway access to community;
human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes; public art;
intergenerational activities/connections; aesthetic continuity to Central Park; quality
decorative ornamental lighting; design continuity; architectural design that breaks from
precedent; passive village square; design for flexible open ended growth; signage
(informational and directional); efficient street accesses; parkway-tree lined streets with
walkways; County Road C and Lexington as street entry with streetscape;
monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens; co-generation of energy.
DEFINITION OF THE DISTRICT (draft for consideration and inclusion in
Comprehensive Plan after a public hearing to be held on May 12, 1999, by the
Roseville Planning Commission, with a decision by the City Council
anticipated May 24, 1999, or at a later date.)
Within the City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan and Map, (Section 4, Subsection II, pages two
and three), the listing and description of Land Use Categories is hereby amended to add the "City
Center Land Use District" as follows: This district, with a boundary as described above and
consisting of approximately 121 acres, shall be defined as a mixed use area wherein current and
future public and private uses may occur simultaneously and adjacent to each other. The uses
may include center(s) for the community, government, and recreation programs, with
complementary public or private housing, retail, transportation, and other uses as allowed in the
City Center District Zoning Ordinance. The site planning, design and architecture, and public
infrastructure investments shall be consistent with a master plan for the area. It is anticipated that
the zoning for this district will be a Planned Unit Development. All new developments will be
reviewed as an amendment to the PUD.
PUBLIC PARTICPATION AND INPUT PROCESS
Process continues with notice, displays, public meetings, and video of meetings; invitations and
discussions with interest groups and residents at May 20th meeting; Planning Commission to hold
public hearings on addition of" City Center District" to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
LOCATION OF DISTRICT:
The location of the City Center District is the area shown on the attached map and generally
described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Howard Johnson Park along WoodhiIl
Drive, east along the Woodhill Drive right-of-way (and also including the VFW, Shopping
Center, and Veteran's Park north of Wood hill Drive) to Victoria Street; then south along Victoria
to the intersection with County Road "C"; then west along the south right-of-way line of the
BNSF railroad right-of-way (and also including the Roseville Mobile Home Park adjacent to the
railroad right-of-way) to a point of intersection with a line extended south along the west
property line of Howard Johnson Park; the north along the west edge of Howard Johnson Park to
3
-- -------- -------
~
..
the point of beginning.
Because street views and entries to the City Center play an important role in the "sense of place",
the district includes the right-of-way of Wood hill Drive from Hamline Avenue to Victoria Street;
County Road "C "from Hamline Avenue to Victoria Street, Lexington Avenue from County
Road "C-2" to Highway 36; and Victoria Street from Woodhill to County Road "C".
Q:\CITYCENT\City Center District.ed3(042199),doc
4
-
II
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
ent Approval:
DATE: 05/12/99
ITEM NO: 6A
Agenda Section:
HEARING
City Center Task Force Recommendation to amend the Comprehensive Plan
and establish a Comprehensive Plan City Center District (PF# 3119)
Manager Approval:
Ite Description:
1.0 REQUESTED ACTION
1.1 The City Center Task Force was appointed by the City Council in 1998 to establish a vision
and a plan for the City Center. The City Center Master Plan was one of the concepts in the
Comprehensive Plan that was to be complete after the original adoption in1994. The Task
Force seeks public input and City (Planning Commission and City Council) approval of an
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that recognizes the long tenn vision, proposed uses,
and district boundaries of the City Center District.
1.2 The Task Force has worked for eight months with urban planning consultant Kim Way to
prepare a 40 year vision and the uses that may be mcluded in the plan. During that time they
have met at least monthly and taken a tour of community centers and recreation centers
throughout the suburban metropolitan area. They have also reviewed city surveys, socio-
demographics for the area and heard from the city departments regarding the users of
services and future needs.
1.3 The tentative hearing and action schedule for this project is as follows:
05/12/99 Planning Commission hearing and recommendation on the plan
05120/99 Task Force meeting with public and interest groups on uses proposed within
the City Center
OS/24/99 City Council action on plan
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Vista 2000, a community projection of what Roseville should look like in year 2000,
recommended that the city create a "sense of place" and "construct a Roseville Community
Center which would provide areas for seniors, gymnastics, cou..'i games, fitness, water play,
meeting space, cultural arts and social gatherings"(page 9). The Vista teams also
recommended"... a pathway (sidewalk) system that connect park trails with major civic
buildings, recreational and cultural facilities and shopping facilities". (page 10)
In 1994 the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. Within that plan (and the 1998 plan)
was an implementation program which included creating a city center master plan. (Section
II, p.3 ) A goal of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan is to "Create a master-planned Civic Center
Complex for government, life safety, public recreation and specilaized housing located on
PF3119 - RCA (05/12/99) - Page I of 4
n-q~
S-~ .r
land surrounding the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road C". (Section 3,
p.17,#16)
2.2 The 121 acre proposed City Center District is currently designated in the Comprehensive
Plan for park, civic uses, high density housing, low density housing, and school uses.
2.3 In addition to existing parks, three primarily civic uses are proposed within the District - a
government center, community center, and a recreation center. Complementary uses
proposed include accessory retail uses and higher density housing.
2.4 The site is extensive in size, in part, to provide for improved pathway and sidewalk access
to the community buildings and public park facilities.
2.5 Adjacent to Conty Road C is the Burlington Northern railway right-ofway.(now leased to
Minnesota Transfer). A portion of this right-of-way is already being abandon in Hennepin
County. It is possible that the rail line in Roseville, including the area adjacent to the city
center site may be abandon in the future. A City policy is to acquire such abandon rail lines
for public use for pathways or transit uses. Because the city center would be a natural
pedestrian or transit stop for most residents, the rail line right-of-way could be an asset to the
city center and the adjoining property.
3.0 STAFF COMMENTS & FINDINGS
In reviewing this item, staff had the following comments:
3.1 The City's Comprehensive Plan map designates portions of the County Road C and
Lexington area for civic uses and the remainder for residential, school, and park uses. The
zoning ofthe site is single family (R-l), general business (B-3), and multi-family three to
twenty-four units per acre (R3-A). Maps are attached. The proposed uses are consistent with
the comprehensive plan map.
3.2. The City's Comprehensive Plan text currently specifically does address these palcels and the
concept of a city center. The policies within the plan also provide direction to eliminate
blight, upgrade neighborhoods with a mix of compatible uses, and provide access to
community and recreation resources. The proposed uses are consistent with the
comprehensive plan goals, policies, and general text as described in Section 2 of this report.
3.3 Lexington Avenue currently has a capacity of 18,000 vehicle trips per day, with a current use
of 14,000 vehicles per day. County Road C also has a capacity of approximately 18,000
vehicle trips per day, with current use of approximately 11,000 vehicle trips. By year 2020
Lexington is expected to increase to 17,000 trips, while County Road C will increase to
14,500 trips. Turning lanes could increase the capacity at the comer of Lexington and C.
recognizing the many of the proposed uses already exist on the city center site, there appears
to be adequate capacity to serve the proposal. As new facilities are proposed, the potential
PF3119 - RCA (05/12/99) - Page 2 of 4
traffic should be re-examined.
3.4 Utilities are available and have capacity for any use the city center proposal anticipates.
3.5 In the future, the Planning Commission and Council would have to approve a new mixed use
zoning district which would comply with the proposed City Center Comprehensive Plan
District. Based on the description of the proposed City Center Comprehensive Plan District,
existing development would be allowed to remain and be a permitted use in a mixed use,
Planned Unit Development (PUD) zone. However, at some future time when either a public
or private property owner proposes a change to the existing land use and an amendment to
the yet-to-be-defined PUD, a public hearing would be required. Through this hearing
process, the individual and cumulative impacts of each development would then be discussed
as they are proposed.
3.6 In conjunction with the application for concept development plan approval, the following
documents have been submitted and reviewed by staff in preparation of this report:
a. City Center Comprehensive Plan Proposed District and Boundary
b. April, 1999 City Center Task Force Meeting Notes
c. Summary of Task Force Activities
4,0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION
4.1 Based on the [mdings outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends approval of the
Comprehensive Plan amendment to create a new Plan District entitled the "City Center
District" as more fully described in the attached report from the City Center Task Force.
The proposal is consistent with previous direction in the Comprehensive Plans of 1994 and
1998.
5.0 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
On April 17, 1999, the City Center Task Force discussed the issues (see attached excerpt
from the draft minutes). The Task Force, by consensus, recommended approval of the
plan
6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION
By motion, approve the new City Center Planning District as consistent with previous
direction in the Comprehensive Plans of 1994 and 1998, and recommend that the Council
approve adoption of the new district as an amendment to the City Comprehensive Plan.
(If the City Council approves the Plan amendment, the City must also seek Metropolitan
Council review prior and approval.)
PF3119 - RCA (05/12/99) - Page 3 of 4
Attachments: Location Compo Plan and Zoning maps; District Boundary Plan; Task Force
Report; Meeting Notes from April17 meeting;
Q:\CITYCENT\PF3119-PCA(051299),doc
PF3119 - RCA (05/12/99) - Page 4 of 4
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12, 1999:
RE: AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CREATE
A CITY CENTER DISTRICT AND BOUNDARY
6b. Plannin2 File 3119. City of Roseville request for an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to create a new land use district (City Center District) and to
establish the land-use boundary of the City Center District, Roseville, MN.
Chair Klausing opened the hearing and requested a report on the proposal. Mr.
Keith Wietecki, chairperson of the City Center Task Force, presented a summary
of the Task Force Report.
Mr. Wietecki explained the legislative function of comprehensive planning, He
noted in 1994 the Comprehensive Plan was updated. A change in the
Comprehensive Plan is a change to future land use. No land use changes until the
owner of the property makes a physical change.
He explained the previous decision-making process, Vista 2000 program, and the
need to appoint a task force to look at the City Center Plan.
The purpose of the district was to create a central area within Roseville and to
create a unique sense of place. The proposed uses included a government center,
recreation center, community center, housing transportation and park uses.
Intentions of the district include:
. Providing uniform access
. Tie together parcels
. Create common design themes
Mr. Wietecki illustrated the district boundary and described the parcels that would
be included,
Chair Klausing asked for clarification on the "downtown Roseville" concept. Mr.
Wietecki explained the downtown would be a meeting space, a sense of place.
Chair Klausing and Member Egli explained that they were both on the Task
Force.
Member Egli asked for examples of civic centers that had been toured. Mr.
Wietecki listed the following:
. Brooklyn Center
. Maple Grove/Plymouth
. Chanhassen
. Prior Lake/Mystic Lake
. 50th. And France
.~q,
~\1-
. Edinborough and Centennial Lakes
. Maplewood Community Center
. Shoreview Community Center
Member Rhody asked what process the Task Force has completed regarding the
trailer park. Keith Wietecki explained the process of the re-development. He
noted in 40 years, something will happen on this site. Whatever replaces or
improves the mobile home park must adhere to the Comprehensive Plan. The
Task Force is now taking public input from the residents and interest groups,
Member Olson asked why the VFW was included.
Member Wilke noted that the whole project would be completed in 40 years.
What is a timetable for the City Center? Mr. Wietecki noted that the Arona
building recreation center needs to be moved in 2-4 years and will include a
referendum. The schools are getting crowded, the meeting space is small, the
recreation center is deteriorating, the fire station is too small. The private
development is a much longer-tenn issue.
Member Cunningham asked how long it took to construct other centers. Mr.
Wietecki estimated 5-10 years.
Member Olson asked if there was enough space to add facilities to this site, Mr.
Wietecki noted higher buildings and ramps can be done but are expensive. The
public works building could be moved to a coordinated central location.
Chair Klausing asked why is it necessary? What purpose is there to amend the
Plan if no changes in land use will occur? Mr. Wietecki noted that the plan gives
time to decide what will be on the site in the future. It provides assurance of
future land use and zoning.
Member Egli asked for explanation of public input that will occur and has
occurred. Mr. Wietecki noted what meetings were held once per month.
Community discussions will begin again on May 20, 1999. He listed the
organizations that have already been invited.
A ten-minute break was taken,
Donna Hanson, mobile home park, was concerned about the time frame - when
will the mobile home park be bought? Keith Wietecki responded the reason for
the mobile home park inclusion is for a light-rail transit stop. The primary use
will include transit and higher density housing. The transit will be detennined by
the legislative funding.
Chair Klausing noted that he was opposed to city acquisition of the mobile home
park because the Huberty site has higher priority as does the public works
relocation. The value of a diverse housing stock is important to the city (from
Vista 2000).
Rebecca Caulfield, 1117 Oakcrest, explained that traffic was a major concern.
What is proposed on Lexington and County Road C right-of-way? Mr. Wietecki
stated that the right-of-way would be improved but not private property, Is traffic
to increase? (Not yet, awaiting specific proposals)
Eugene Bahniman, 2656 Lexington Avenue, expressed concern about decline in
property value on his site, and more traffic on the site, He asked what is "a source
of pride"? What is an indoor/outdoor park?
Tonya Lafollette, mobile home park resident, lives her because of location,
security; put a recreation center in Central Park. The neighborhood is good. Does
the City have any idea when transit would come to Roseville?
Bill Lonsky, 2725 Dellwood Ave., asked what will happen to Howard Johnson
Park? Why did the boundary not include Central Park? What stops a commercial
tattoo parlor? Will property values change? Mr. Wietecki noted there is currently
no linkage to Howard Johnson Park.
Alice Pierce, Snelling Avenue, asked how much was the grant? What are the
long-term costs of this plan? Will there be an increase in tax rates to the City of
Roseville? Hamline Center is in need of commercial revamping. Mr. Wietecki
noted that long-term costs are unclear at this time, but hopes are that costs can be
shared with public/private partnership.
Jim Foley, 2717 Merrill St., stated the city does not need more buildings or
transit.
Paula Griffin, mobile home park, stated she was opposed to changes in the mobile
home park.
Paula Maczko, Fernwood Ave., expressed concern about property tax, property
value, and traffic. Where will the building be located and what will the zoning
be?
Sheila Ryan, 2690 Oxford St., Parkview Terrace Condos, asked why this comes to
the Planning Commission first? Mr. Wietecki explained the need for the district in
order to prepare the master plan, Why "may" is used on complementary uses
such as housing or retail?
Don Siegfried, 2680 Oxford St., Parkview Terrace Condo, asked how an
amphitheater, pool, and all the other uses will fit within 121 acres? Should the
planning process be more specific? Why should Central Park not be included?
Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn Ave, asked what the zoning process is? Why-what
do you want to do with it? Where is the plan? Why weren't all property owners
notified?
Joan Jacobson, 2690 Oxford, asked why transit/rail when bus system is lousy?
Prefer a bike path, no shopping center, move school to Hamline Center.
Mildred Roesch, 1000 Woodhill Dr., asked why adjacent residents are not part of
the Task Force? Is it possible that residents could be added? The planning
process is too short (9 months). Is the comprehensive plan the first step for
rezoning? What guarantees are there that the plan will remain? Look only at the
"purple" area with city buildings.
John Wilson, mobile home park, asked why the change in the comprehensive plan
to higher density?
Caroline Cash, 2743 Dellwood, why is Scott Bergs of Falcon Heights on the Task
Force?
Mike Flanagan, 1016 Woodhill Dr., asked if nothing will happen in 4 years? Can
the City say there is a "sense of pride" in the community?
Karla Miller, VFW member, asked why the residents at the meeting were not
asked to participate?
Delores Ford, 2734 Dellwood, asked what guarantee is there that the City Center
District will not be expanded in the future?
Member Wilke asked if the Task Force was asked to study a specific site?
(Lexington and C). Member Egli noted that the 1994 Comprehensive Plan did
specify this area?
Steve Webster asked why the mobile home court was not brought up as a strip
center? Why re-zone to high density?
Laurie Carr, 2733 Dellwood, noted that Roseville has small parks and projects;
when considering a City Center, would it change the scale? If zoning changes,
will the requirements not change?
Jean Urman, 1025 Woodhill Dr., asked for clarification regarding zoning.
Pam John, MnDOT, stated that she had not heard of the mass transit proposaL
What action would be taken to establish an ordinance regarding the mobile home
court?
George Warner, 2658 Huron St., asked what would be the zoning of Howard
Johnson Park?
John Kyslycian, Victoria Ave., asked for details of the cost of the consultant
contract? What is the final cost? When is the final phase of the Task Force? (In
the year 2000) What is down grading of zoning in the mobile home park?
Sheila Mahnken, mobile home park, asked why the process is reversed? What are
the number of years to build a city center? Why did the Task Force not look at St.
Paul Recreation Centers? Why is there a "market place" included? Why is the
area south of "C", west of the mobile home park not included? Who are the
organizations that will be contacted to provide input? Why should businesses pay
for renovations? Not many of the organizations listed were located in the study
area. Did resident or city needs start the process?
Wendell Brown, Griggs Ave" explained that the Task Force has planned and
fairly treated the topics,
Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn, stated this is premature because all Roseville
residents have not been told what will happen and what it will cost. Nine months
planning is too short of a time. He explained that the city previously held
citywide meetings on the road reconstruction. Table this. Do not give the City
Council a recommendation. Take no action.
Bill Lonsky, 2725 Dellwood Ave., stated no action should be taken. Postpone
your recommendation and vote. This is a confusing project. Why should the vote
be biased by the Task Force?
Karen Bahniman, Lexington Ave., said she was opposed.
George Warner, 2658 Huron St., stated the project was premature and should not
be recommended. The area should be smaller and include only the city site.
John Kyslycian, Victoria St., stated that the issue should be tabled. There are
questions to be answered. The area is too large, should start smaller and with a
finite plan. The Burlington Northern line will be abandoned. The state and state
agencies, then county have first options on the railroad line. Light rail time-lines
are a guess, There are assumptions that have been made, The trailer park
ordinance (ss327c) is unclear. The county sheriff and state may ask to build a
building on the city center site. The county wants a countywide dispatch and
police facility with jail and courthouse. Buildings are not a source of pride.
Karla Miller, 2133 Avon St., said she was not allowed to speak at the Task Force
meetings, She is a VFW and American Legion member and bikes to work. She
likes Roseville as it is.
Tonya Lafollette, 2599 Lexington, asked the Planning Commission to think of the
people who this will impact.
No further comments were offered.
Chair Klausing closed the public hearing.
Chair Klausing noted that the council appointed Chair Klausing and Member Egli
to both committees. Member Egli stated that she has no problem with the
Member Egli and Chair Klausing participation.
Member Mulder noted there is no personal gain or conflict.
Chair Klausing noted that there could have been more public input. It is unclear
where additional meetings with the Task Force would have changed the
recommendation from them.
Member Olson stated that the designation in the Comprehensive Plan is too
premature. The Task Force meetings may help. There should be citywide
discussion.
Member Mulder explained that he was concerned that the Task Force
recommendation may be premature because a consensus is necessary. A greater
comfort level is needed. There are many myths that must be corrected.
Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Rhody, to continue the
public hearing to the July 14, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, after the Task
Force meetings.
Mr. Wietecki asked the commission what the expectation would be in July from
the Task Force? Member Mulder asked for more detail. Member Olson asked
what type of meeting will be held and who will be invited?
Chair Klausing asked if the hearing must be re-advertised if the district boundary
is enlarged to include the Central Park area.
Member Rhody explained that the "go slow" approach will allow residents to
meet with the Task Force.
Member Egli noted that more themes may appear and that it may reqUIre
amending the boundaries.
Member Wilke explained that the process and education on the topic must be
expanded. What does this project really do?
Member Cunningham described what other community center services may be.
The scope has expanded and impacts more neighborhoods. Should this project be
centralized or decentralized?
Chair Klausing explained that the Task Force must "sell the idea." Nothing new
may occur,
Member Rhody said this was/should have been a concept review with a 60-day
pause, There should be a firm proposal for the Commission to review.
Ayes: Wilke, Cunningham, Mulder, Olson, Rhody, Egli, Klausing
Nays: None
Motion Carried: 7-0
Community
Development
May 1999
Proposed City Center District
City of Roseville
Area Percent of
(acres) Proposed
City Center
Area
Comp Plan Designation
(Future Land Use) B- Business 4.8 3.9%
C-Civic 19.4 16.0%
HR-High Density Residential 29.7 24.6%
LR-Low Density Residential 2.3 1.9%
P-Park 17.6 14.5%
ROW-Right-of-Way 32.7 27.0%
RR-Railroad 8.8 7.2%
S-School 5.8 4.8%
Total: 121.0 100.0%
Existing Land Use
(35W Designations) IN-I nstitutional 19.4 16.0%
MF-Multi Family 10.6 8.8%
MHP-Mobile Home Park 9.1 7.6%
NC-Neighborhood Commercial 2.8 2.3%
OFC-Office 5.9 4.8%
RC-Regional Commercial 1.9 1.6%
ROW-Right-of-Way 32.7 27.0%
SFA-Single Family Attached 0.6 0.5%
SFD-Single Family Detached 7.2 5.9%
SRO-SportlRecreation-Outdoor 17.6 14.5%
UTL-Utility (Railroad) 8.8 7.2%
VDL-Vacant-Developable 4.5 3.7%
Total: 121.0 100.0%
Zoning Designation
B1-Limited Business 0.4 0.3%
B2-Retail Business 0.3 0.2%
B3-General Business 9.1 7.6%
B4-Retail Office Service 4.5 3.7%
R1-Single Family Residential 54.1 44.7%
R2-Two Family Residential 0.6 0.5%
R3A- Three to Twenty Four Family 10.6 8.8%
ROW-Right-of-Way 32.7 27.0%
RR-Railroad 8.8 7.2%
Total: 121.0 100.0%
05/06/1999 City_ Center_Designation_Areas.xls
( .o.vr!\
7'\0
City of
~
Minnesota
Community Development Department
May 5, 1999
Dear Resident:
During the month of May three meetings will be held on the concept of a City Center.
This is a continuing planning process to detennine the future needs of the city.
The first meeting will be held on Wednesday, May lih. The City of Roseville Planning
Commission will hold a hearing to gain public comment on the proposal by the City
Center Task Force to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan - a long range view (up to
40 years) of what area should be included in the future city center district. Pathways
from the adjoining neighborhoods to the City Center also may be proposed. The
recommendations from the Task Force are attached.
The second meeting will be held on Thursday, May 20th. The City Center Task Force
will seek additional comment on the mix of features that should be included within the
City Center. In addition to the existing uses in the area, three new primary uses are
proposed: a government center for local government, a community center with meeting
spaces; and/or a recreation center with more recreation facilities.
The third meeting is the City Council meeting to be held on May 24th. The City Council
will review the comments from the other two meetings and consider next steps in the
planning process.
All meetings begin at 6:30pm in the City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive.
Attached are the descriptions of the City Center Concept and the notes from the last Task
Force meeting. Also attached is a list of the citizens on the City Center Task Force and
the City Planning Commission.
If there are questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~
Dennis Welsch, (651-490-2232)
Community Development Director
Q:\CITYCENT\3meetingnotice(May3),doc
OvO\,
~J)'
. ~ y(.'!>II<\ S- ~S~ c;
i~~ . ~~
t:LJ ;f~~M
<i?- ~ ;'15"9", 0~
~. ~ ~
W ~ tf-1J
(~~ )~
7' tJ-t/ ~ -ck
, t~ tLA--1L .) W..L- ~
h~ , . :k~~
J'f}TL~~~ "rllJ~
r: - /1 . r-_.. _ J ~ · - }
~ LA._~_~-^_'l./6"YV') ,~ ~ ~ ~-
0J-n -z;I1-L ~ ~
~-rl/ iuL
'~/ ~~ ~)
-; .- (ll-;;- f . r .
, ~
~ ' . V'-YL/ ~ :,
" ~~!/~
~ ,~. ~ ~
tUJ-- ~ '7~ ~) ~-
~ . U~!/UJL~
~. ,r Y-~ c~(J
~~~~~
y
~ ~z ?~Lo~J
~ ~ ~ ~'-d'\_
~ ~ L1A~~
~ t6 ~-j.~ ..~.
'. , '- GI' ~ )
~ . ,~
~~:uf~
~ ~cL~
.
~-Vl__~b. .
i~ ~~~.
\J2j ~. .,f? ~~eJ
~ ~ ' /)'"
~ .A;tu ~ ~
~/L . ' ~ ~-aJ)
~ ~,M ~~~;cz-
~.~
~ ) ~~~
~~ ~~
cJL...
Wn ! ~/L~
//,f"o &~aJ
If ~,z/~ul ~J
-- -- -----
City of RosevilIe
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:
Police
Division:
1. Date: 4/30/99
2. Name of Building or Facility: Currently: City Hall, fur.lfe: Public SafetylPolice
3. Location of Building or Facility: On sitel ot1, either is acceptable
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 27 years
5. Size of existing building (square feet): Designated Police area is approx. 2,000
Sq. ft.
6. Size of existing site (acres): No idea
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: We currently have 25 work
stations, many of which are shared.
8. Employee parking (number): We use spaces that are shared by everyone coming
to City Hall, either employed or visiting. Security is at a nlinimum for police
'lehicles.
9. Customer parking (number): unknown
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): Eleven parking spaces are
currently reserved for units at the Public Works garage. The garage houses less
than Vz of our fleet.
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: L'1door fireanns range,
holding cells, male and female locker rooms, interrogation/interview rooms,
records storage area to maintain privacy and security requirements, areas for
volunteer reserve units, training room, etc.
2
, (A~
vt ')0'
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
Reserves, Explorers.
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: None
14. Structural conditional of building: good
15. Operational condition of the building: poor
16. Other issues: Limited space, data privacy issues (statutory), severe space
limitations for evidence and property room, female locker space, line up
limitations during changeover, prisoner handling and processing, space for
records, no meeting room space, to much sharing of work stations, storage for any
large items, zero technology for the training room.
)
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessme<1t of Facility Needs
Department: Police
Division:
NE\V FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
17. Year the new building would be needed: ASAP, we are working with severe
space limitations now.
18. Size of new building (square feet): Approx. 25,000 Sq. Ft.
19. Size of new site (acres): Unknown
20. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 4 spaces for
records techs, 4 administrative offices, 2 CSO spaces, I space for reserve officers
(currently we have 24 on staff), 5 investigator work stations, 1 juvenile officer, I
school liaison officer, 1 crime prevention officer, 1 operation Lts, Office, 3 spaces
shared by 6 Sgts., 6 spaces shared by 32 officers for reports etc. Approx total
29.
21. Estimated employee parking (number): 20
22. . Estimated customer parking (number): 20
23. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): 25 spaces
24. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Security keys when
building closed at night, Firearms Range, cells, security needs, sally port for
bringing in prisoners, prisoner processing area, male! female locker rooms, large
training room, interrogation/interview room.
25. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
None, but we could co-exist with the fire department and possibly consolidate
some efforts, which in the long run might save the city some money.
-t
---------
26. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: None
27. Unique structures needed within new building: Cell Block, Fireanns Range.
28. Unique operational improvements within new building: The center could be set
up with administration from both fire and police working from the center. I think
a new building would create a number of unique opponunities for the future.
29. Unique land/siting issues: Should be located for easy access by public and
employees.
30. Other issues: Security.
Q :'C[TYCENT\Ci tyC~nterDi5trictAs5essment5(0422 99),doc
5
City of Roseville
City Centt'r Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division:Accounting
I, Date: April 26, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility: City Hali
3. Location of Building or FaciJity: Civic Center Campus
EXISTING FACILITY
4, Age of Current Building: 22 years
5, Size of existing building (square feet): (Our share is 1,200 sq, ft.)
6. Size of existing site (acres):nla
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: 7
8. Employee parking (number): 7
9. Customer parking (number): Shared 2-4
10, Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): nla
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Attractively
decorated and designed. Very compact yet functional
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
1 ~
- -"
Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: 0
14, Structural condition of the building: Good
15. Operational condition of the building: Good
16. Other issues
~,~~, ~~
2
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division: Accounting
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed: 2005
17, Size of new building (square feet): 1,500 sq ft.
18, Size of new site (acres): nIa
19, Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 7-8
20, Estimated employee parking (number): 7-8
21, Estimated customer parking (number): 3-4 shared
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): n/a
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Designed for high
tech operation
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation: ?
25. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: n/a
26. Unique structures needed within new building: none
27. Unique operational improvements within new building: Designed with
receptionist and department within the same work area for more efficient
operation
28. Unique land/siting issues: nIa
29, Other issues:
3
Citv of RosevilIe
~~llP4;O
~
. ~h,,1co
~
't)"c. '\1tL'-'1tEO 11>
~~ ~ ~-e..AGCUI""'"
1\M W\...... ~/~
~~~.
~~
-
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Parks and Recreation
Division:
I. Date: April 22, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility: Roseville Activity Center
3. Location of Building or Faciiity: 2800 Arona St.
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 38 years (constructed 1961)
5. Size of existing building (square feet): 36,000
6. Size of existing site (acres): 14.7
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: 11 full time, 1 part time
. 2 Admin.
. 4 Programmers
. I intern
. 1 custodian
e 3 cierical
. I teen coordinator (part time)
8. Employee parking (number): 12 plus City van and occasional other city vehicles
left overnight.
9. Customer parking (number): 123
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.):
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation:
. Small gymnasium
. Teen center
. Community group storage space
2
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site:
$49,000 (lease approximately 4,800 s.f. to Moundsview Schools and ACCEL
Academy
14. Structural condition of the building: Very poor!
" Roof leaks
" carpeting must be removed because of mold concerns
" windows are very energy in-efficient
" steam traps all leak and add to mold concern
15. Operational condition of the building: functions well for users but is very in-
efficient to operate.
16. Other issues
City of R('sevillc
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Parks and Recreation
Division:
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed:
" 2001 for Administrative offices and community space
. 2002 for aquatics and recreational space
17. Size of new building (square feet):
" Administrative offices 1,500 s.f.
. Recreational space 25,000 s.f.
. Aquatics 18,000 s.f.
. Community space 5,000 s.f.
" Art space 16,000 s.f.
3
. Community storage space 3,300 s.f.
. Child care area 1,000 s.f.
. Snack bar 1,000 s.f
. Indoor play area 4,2000 s.f.
. Indoor Winter Garden s.f. ????
NOTE: Square foot estimates DO NOT include, lockerrooms, mechanical,
circulation, storage, reception spaces
These estimates are also based on the middle range of ultimate facilities.
18. Size of new site (acres): 4 acres (ramped parking)
19. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 14
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 17
21. Estimated customer parking (number): 400 (includes current 225 spaces at
Skating Center)
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f):
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation:
. Parks and Recreation Administrative Offices
. Community meeting space
. Leisure pool complex
. Recreational activity space including fitness area, gym, indoor playground
. Arts space
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
25. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: $80,000
from recreational fees ii'om pool and fitness areas. Potential additional funds
from leasing school or private accessory space.
26. Unique structures needed within new building:
. Parking ramp
. High ceilings tor water slides in pool
~ Gym with high ceilings for climbing structure and ball area
. Indoor playground
8 Indoor winter garden
. Storage bays for community group equipment
4
27. Unique operational improvements within new building:
. good connections between activities.
. Like concept of administrative offices, storage space and meeting rooms
being added to north end of OV AL.
28. Unique land/siting issues:
. Green space and outdoor assembly space.
. Good pathway connections
29. Other issues:
. Connections to Central park
. Private restaurant and physical therapy clinic added
Q:\CITYC ENTlCityCenterDistrictAs:;essments(042299) ,doc
5
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:
Police
Division:
1. Date: 4/30/99
2. Name of Building or Facility: Currently: City Hall, future: Public Safety/Police
3. Location of Building or Facility: On sitel off, either is acceptable
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 27 years
5. Size of existing building (square feet): Designated Police area is approx. 2,000
Sq. ft.
6. Size of existing site (acres): No idea
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: We currently have 25 work
stations, many ofwmch are shared.
8. Employee parking (number): We use spaces that are shared by everyone coming
to City Hall, either employed or visiting. Security is at a minimum for police
vehicles.
9. Customer parking (number): unknown
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): Eleven parking spaces are
currently reserved for units at the Public Works garage. The garage houses less
than Yz of our fleet.
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: L'1door firearms range,
holding cells, male and female locker rooms, interrogation/interview rooms,
records storage area to maintain privacy a.'1d security requirements, areas for
volunteer reserve units, training room, etc.
1
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
Reserves, Explorers.
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.O of your building or site: None
14. Structural conditional of building: good
15. Operational condition of the building: poor
16. Other issues: Limited space, data privacy issues (statutory), severe space
limitations for evidence and property room, female locker space, line up
limitations during changeover, prisoner handling and processing, space for
records, no meeting room space, to much sharing of work stations, storage for any
large items, zero technology for the training room.
3
City of RosevilIe
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Police
Division:
NE\V F ACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
~w FACILITY
17. Year the new building would be needed: ASAP, we are working with severe
space limitations now.
18. Size of new building (square feet): Approx. 25,000 Sq. Ft.
19. Size of new site (acres): Unknown
20. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 4 spaces for
records techs, 4 administrative offices, 2 CSO spaces, 1 space for reserve officers
(currently we have 24 on staff), 5 investigator work stations, 1 juvenile officer, I
school liaison officer, 1 crime prevention officer, I operation Lts. Office, 3 spaces
shared by 6 SgtS., 6 spaces shared by 32 officers for reports etc. Approx total
29.
21. Estimated employee parking (number): 20
22. . Estimated customer parking (number): 20
23. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): 25 spaces
24. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Security keys when
building closed at night, Firearms Range, cells, security needs, sally port for
bringing in prisoners, prisoner processing area, male/ female locker rooms, large
training room, interrogation/interview room.
25. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
None, but we could co-exist with the fire d~partment and possibly consolidate
some efforts, which in the long run might save the city some money.
4
---------------
26. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (5.f.) of your building or site: None
27. Unique structures needed within new building: Cell Block, Fireanns Range.
28. Unique operational improvements within new building: The center could be set
up with administration from both fire and police working from the center. I think
a new building would create a number of unique opporrunities for the future.
29. Unique land/siting issues: Should be located for easy access by public and
employees.
30. Other issues: Security.
Q: 'CITYCENT\Ci tyCenterDistrictAssessments(042299) ,doc
j
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division:Accounting
I, Date: April 26, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility: City Hall
3. Location of Building or Facility: Civic Center Campus
EXISTING FACILITY
4, Age of Current Building: 22 years
5. Size of existing building (square feet): (Our share is 1,200 sq. ft.)
6. Size of existing site (acres):nJa
7, Number of employees with work stations in building: 7
8. Employee parking (number): 7
9. Customer parking (number): Shared 2-4
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): nJa
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Attractively
decorated and designed. Very compact yet functional
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
I~
- -'.
Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: 0
14. Structural condition of the building: Good
15. Operational condition of the building: Good
16. Other issues
2
- -----------
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division: Accounting
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16, Year the new building would be needed: 2005
17. Size of new building (square feet): 1,500 sq ft.
18. Size of new site (acres): nJa
19, Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 7-8
20, Estimated employee parking (number): 7-8
21, Estimated customer parking (number): 3-4 shared
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s,f): n/a
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operaticn: Designed for high
tech operation
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation: ?
25, Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s,f) of your building or site: nla
26. Unique stlllctures needed within new building: ncne
27. Unique operational improvements within new building: Designed with
receptionist and department within the same work area for more efficient
operation
28, Unique land/siting issues: nJa
29. Other issues:
3
y"---/~,~=
City of Roseville
City Center T,lSk Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division: License Center
1.
Date:
April 26, 1999
2, Name of Building or Facility Old City Hall.
3, Location ofBuilcling or Facility: Civic Center Campus (both)
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 50 Years?
5, Size of existing building (square feet): 2,500
6. Size of existing site (acres): N/ A
7, Number of employees with work stations in building: 10,5
8. Employee parking (number):8
9. Customer parking (number):60
10, Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): N/A
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Server Farm with
Fibre Optic connections
12, Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s,f.) of your building or site: $145,000
14. Stmctural condition of the building: Fair
15. Operational condition of the building: Fair
16, Other issues
:2
r
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:Finance
Division:License
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assum~ you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed: 2005
17. Size of new building (square feet):3,OOO
18, Size of new site (acres) : Unknown
19, Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 12
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 10
21. Estimated customer parking (number):70
22, Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): N/A
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: A drive up for tabs
might be nice.
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
25. Revenue (annual) from ieases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: 150,000-
175,000
26, Unique structures needed within new building: N/ A
27. Unique operational improvements within new building: Wired for technology
room as IS now.
28. Unique land/siting issues:
29. Other issues:
3
"
UPDATED VERSION: 9/20/00
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:
Police
Division:
1. Date: 4/30/99
2. Name of Building or Facility: Currently: City Hall, future: Public Safety/Police
3. Location of Building or Facility: On site/off, either is acceptable
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 27 years
5. Size of existing building (square feet): Designated Police area is approx. 3,000 sq. ft.
6. Size of existing site (acres): No idea
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: We currently have 27 work
stations, many of which are shared.
8. Employee parking (number): We use spaces that are shared by everyone coming to City
Hall, either employed or visiting. Security is at a minimum for police vehicles. Parking
for cruisers at lower lot, approximately 10 vehicles.
9. Customer parking (number): unknown
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): Eleven parking spaces are currently
reserved for units at the Public Works garage. The garage houses less than 1;2 of our fleet.
II. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Indoor firearms range,
holding cells for prisoners, male and female locker rooms, interrogation/interview rooms,
Intoxilyzer room, records management area to maintain privacy and security
requirements, areas for volunteer reserve units, training room, evidence handling area,
community policing impacts, day/night operational issues, onsite traffic separation,
perimeter security, etc.
UPDATED VERSION: 9/20/00
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
Reserves, Explorers, CSOs, Cadets, Volunteers.
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: None
14. Structural condition of building: good
15. Operational condition of building: poor
16. Other issues: Limited space, data privacy issues (statutory), severe space limitations for
evidence and property room, female locker space, line up limitations during changeover,
prisoner handling and processing, space for records, no meeting room space, to much
sharing of work stations, limited storage for any large items, zero technology for the
training room.
UPDATED VERSION: 9/20/00
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Police
Division:
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center (Public
Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center Site):
NEW FACILITY:
17. Year the new building would be needed: ASAP, we are working with severe space
limitations now.
18. Size of new building (square feet): Approx. 25,000 Sq. Ft.
19. Size of new site (acres): Unknown
20. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 4 spaces for records
techs, 4 administrative offices, 2 CSO spaces, I area for reserve officers (currently we
have 24 on staff), 5 investigator work stations, 1 juvenile officer, 1 school liaison officer,
I crime prevention officer, 1 operations Lts. Office, 3 spaces shared by 6 Sgts., 6 spaces
shared by 32 officers for reports etc., one
21. Estimated employee parking (number): 25
22. Estimated customer parking (number): 30
23. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): 25 spaces
24. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Security system for after
hours, Firearms range, cells, security needs, sally port for brining in prisoners, prisoner
processing area, male/female locker rooms, large training room, interrogation/interview
rooms, evidence room, onsite traffic separation, community policing impacts, perimeter
security, tactical team storage area, weapons safe and storage area for ammunition, gas
etc., intoxilyzer room, etc.
25. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation: None,
but we could co-exist with the fire department and possibly consolidate some efforts,
which in the long run might save the city some money.
. .~
..
UPDATED VERSION: 9/20/00
26. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building on site: None
27. Unique structures needed with new building: Cell Block, Firearms Range, also see 20 &
24.
28. Unique operational improvements within new building: The center could be set up with
administration from both fire and police working from the center. We could also share
training facilities. I think a new building would create a number of unique opportunities
for the future.
29. Unique land/siting issues: should be located for easy access by public and employees.
30. Other issues: All covered previously.
Welsch, Dennis
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-
Morrison, Pat
Tuesday, September 12, 20009:25 AM
Welsch, Dennis
RE: City Hall Improvements
Dennis,
i think we need "work space" - for departmental copy machine, three hole punch machine, etc.- area to put
agendas/reports together - also, we need area for our departmental supplies (area around the round table a bit of a mess
all the time) - and we need space for a small, comfortable library for staff to sit back & study, read, etc....
Pat
un-Original Messageum
From: Welsch, Dennis
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 4:42 PM
To: *RV_CommDev
Subject: City Hall Improvements
Community Development Staff:
(As an effort to reduce the amount of paper, I am emailing this.)
Kim Way of Ellerbe Becket Architects is working on a "needs analysis" for each department in City Hall He wants to
know what type of space and improvements should be made for each department and what you can see for the next
20 years. Some suggestions I have received for our department include:
We need more meeting space!*#! ...and by the way, can you see that it is heated and cooled properly with some
fresh air changes?
Parking is getting tighter - will this always be, will there be more or less parking in the future?
Individual work spaces seem to be getting smaller, there is not enough plan space, or book shelf space, or display
space.
Is there space for GMMHC (Housing Resource Center) in our department?
Where can we store equipment? Is it really necessary that we have a copy machine in the midst of our office
space? Where do dept. cars go in the future?
Is there room for an electrical inspector in the future?
Is there room for interns and consultants if they join us for a shorter period of time?
Your thoughts on these issues and others are greatly appreciated. In the next 2 weeks we will meet as a staff to
discuss your ideas for these and other improvements. Thanks Dennis
Dennis Welsch
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, Mn. 55113
Phone: 651-490.2232; Fax 651-490-2931
See Roseville's Internet Home Page at: www.cLroseville.mn.us
1
&
W~
Welsch, Dennis
<Q.~ ~ ~
3/( 9.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
~
Welsch, Dennis
Monday, September 11, 2000 4:42 PM
*RV CommDev
City -Hall Improvements
Community Development Staff:
(As an effort to reduce the amount of paper, I am emailing this,)
Kim Way of Ellerbe Becket Architects is working on a "needs analysis" for each department in City Hall He wants to know
what type of space and improvements should be made for each department and what you can see for the next 20 years.
Some suggestions I have received for our department include:
We need more meeting space!*#! ...and by the way, can you see that it is heated and cooled properly with some
fresh air changes?
Parking is getting tighter - will this always be, will there be more or less parking in the future?
Individual work spaces seem to be getting smaller, there is not enough plan space, or book shelf space, or display
space.
Is there space for GMMHC (Housing Resource Center) in our department?
Where can we store equipment? Is it really necessary that we have a copy machine in the midst of our office
space? Where do dept. cars go in the future?
Is there room for an electrical inspector in the future?
Is there room for interns and consultants if they join us for a shorter period of time?
Your thoughts on these issues and others are greatly appreciated. In the next 2 weeks we will meet as a staff to discuss
your ideas for these and other improvements. Thanks Dennis
Dennis Welsch
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, Mn, 55113
Phone: 651-490-2232; Fax 651-490-2931
See Roseville's Internet Home Page at: www.cLroseville.mn.us
1
,cY
\:
c.\: ~
_V-"-J~'~~
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division: License Center
1.
Date:
April 26, 1999
2, Name of Building or Facility Old City Hal!.
3, Location of Builc1ing or Facil ity: Civic Center Campus (both)
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 50 Years ')
5, Size of existing building (square feet): 2,500
6, Size of existing site (acres): N/A
7, Number of employees with work stations in building: 10,5
8. Employee parking (number):8
9. Customer parking (number):60
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): N/A
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Server Farm with
Fibre Optic connections
12, Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13, Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f) of your building or site: $145,000
14. Stmctural condition of the building: Fair
15. Operational condition of the building: Fair
16. Other issues
2
0\0\
11~'
J\lI
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:Finance
Division: License
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16, Year the new building would be needed: 2005
17. Size of new building (square feet):3,OOO
18. Size of new site (acres): Unknown
19. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 12
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 10
21. Estimated customer parking (number):70
22, Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s,f.): N/A
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: A drive up for tabs
might be nice.
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
25. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: 150,000-
175,000
26, Unique structures needed within new building: N/ A
27. Unique operational improvements within new building: Wired for technology
room as IS now.
28. Unique land/siting issues:
29, Other issues:
3
i>'
,
--DRAFT -(04/22/99)
City Center District
The City of Roseville adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, attaching an
implementation strategy to create a master plan for a city center to be located generally
around the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road "C".
The City Council created a citizen task force in 1998 with a charge to define the city center
concept, identify the community needs, and more specifically locate the district. The City
of Roseville and a Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Planning Grant provided funds
for this task force study.
in May, 1999, the Task Force completed phase one of the study approving and
recommending adoption of the purpose, market/users, uses, and location of a City Center
District,
PURPOSE OF DISTRICT:
The purpose of the City Center District is to create a centrally located area within
Roseville with a unique sense of community, a gathering place with social intimacy: a
destination which focuses on community participation and meetings, recreation,
government services, and may have complementary educationaL retail and housing LIses.
MARKET AND ANTICIPATED USERS:
The market and users for this district are residents of Roseville, the adjacent communities and the
regional, national, and world-wide users of the specialized services oftered within the district.
PLA.t~ED USES WITHIN DISTRICT:
The planned public and privately owned uses foreseen within this district are envisioned to be a:
. source of pride
. conununal gathering place; a hub of Roseville community activity for all ages
e center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
. locale for the development of mental and physical health
. venue for government, education, cultural, and sport activities
. marketplace for complementary services and goods
. intergenerational residential living of varied styles
d\
:Gf'(
~<6-
~
CATEGORIES OF VISION. IDEAS. SPECIFIC USES:
1. Uses will be both indoor and outdoor.
2. City support services (roads, paths, parks, utilities, and safety) will be an integral
part of the design.
3. Operational/maintenance features will be designed with efficiency and
functionality.
4. Emphasis will be placed on tone, character, sense of place. ambiance.
5. There will be both active and passive areas
6. Design will include expansion flexibility
7. The site will be a "site for all seasons", featuring seasonal events.
8. The public and private sectors will playa role in the design, financing and
construction either through collaborative work or partnerships.
9. Efficiency, durability, and longevity will be a part of all design.
Examples of specific uses identified for the City Center include the following:
1. Government Center
Updated fire/police facility; updated go\'ernment complex - state. city. county:
government center schools; county service center
2. Community Center
Meeting rooms; teen center; service center: multi-purpose rooms; child care facilities:
volunteer organization spaces; performance theatre; seminar theater; art/history center:
home/garden education facility; continuing education community center; Transit Village
- a major transit facility, possibly Light Rail or Commuter Rail; conference facility:
solarium; storage space for center organizations; religious facility; CTV, city, cable
system; public access studio; satellite postal service; Mini-Conference Center; gallery
area; neighborhood promotion; massage center; community nurse/health services;
kitchen! reception area; technology center - internet access library; charter schools
3, Recreation Center
Outdoor facilities; amphitheater; indoor swimming pool; indoor play area; indoor play
area and park; indoor termis, park and recreation center offices; climbing wall, outdoor
track; basketball/volieyball gym; child play area; craft castle or room; private recreation
area; putting greens;
4. Complementary Retail
Food service/restaurants; neighborhood retail; kiosk/cart vendors; beautyl barber shops;
service-retail; home office service center
5. Complementary Housing
Mixed housing types for all ages and life styles;
2
..
6. Other Uses and Themes
Street level mixed use area; design that blurs distinction between indoor and outdoor;
specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; pathways between the facilities; land mark:
carefully planned parking facilities; a safe place to be; pathway access to community:
human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes; public art;
intergenerational activities/connections; aesthetic continuity to Central Park; quality
decorative ornamental lighting; design continuity; architectural design that breaks from
precedent; passive village square; design for flexible open ended growth; signage
(informational and directional); efficient street accesses; parkway-tree lined streets with
walkways; County Road C and Lexington as street entry with streetscape;
monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens; co-generation of energy.
DEFINITION OF THE DISTRICT (draft for consideration and inclusion in
Comprehensive Plan afte." a public hearing to be held QD May 12. 1999. by the
Roseville Planning Commission. with a decision by the City Council
anticipated May 24. 1999. or at a later dateJ
Within the City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan and Map, (Section 4, Subsection 11, pages t\\O
and three), the listing and description of Land Use Categories is hereby amended to add the "City
Center Land Use District" as follows: This district, with a boundary as described above and
consisting of approximately 121 acres, shall be defined as a mixed use area wherein cun-ent and
future public and private uses may occur simultaneously and adjacent to each other. The uses
may include center(s) for the community, government, and recreation programs, with
complementary public or private housing, retail, transportation, and other uses as allowed in the
City Center District Zoning Ordinance. The site planning, design and architecture, and public
infrastructure investments shall be consistent with a master plan for the area. It is anticipated that
the zoning for this district wili be a Planned Unit Development. All new developments will be
reviewed as an amendment to the PUD.
PUBLIC PARTICPATION AND INPlJ.T PROCESS
Process continues with notice, displays, public meetings, and video of meetings; invitations and
discussions with interest groups and residents at May 20th meeting; Planning Commission to hold
public hearings on addition of" City Center District" to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
LOCA TION OF DISTRICT:
The location of the City Center District is the area shown on the attached map and generally
described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of Howard Johnson Park along Woodhill
Drive, east along the Woodhill Drive right-of-way (and also including the VFW, Shopping
Center, and Veteran's Park north of Woodhill Drive) to Victoria Street; then south along Victoria
to the intersection with County Road "C"; then west along the south right-of-way line of the
BNSF railroad right-of-way (and also including the Roseville Mobile Home Park adjacent to the
railroad right-of-way) to a point of intersection with a line extended south along the west
property line of Howard Johnson Park; the north along the west edge of Ho\vard johnson Park to
'"
-'
-
the point of beginning.
Because street view's and entries to the City Center play an important role in the "sense of place".
the district includes the right-of-way of Woodhil1 Drive from Hamline A venue to Victoria Street:
County Road "C " from Hamline A venue tu Victo!'ia Street, Lexington A venue from Count,:.;
Road "C-2" to Highway 36; and Victoria Street from Woodhill to County Road "C",
Q:ICITYCENTlCity Center DistricLed3(042199),doc
4
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Parks and Recreation
Division:
I. Date: April 22, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility: Roseville Activity Center
3. Location of Building or Faciiity: 2800 Arana S1.
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 38 years (constructed 1961)
5. Size of existing building (square feet): 36,000
6. Size of existing site (acres): 14.7
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: 11 full time, I part time
. 2 Admin.
. 4 Programmers
. I intern
. 1 custodian
. 3 ciericai
. I teen coordinator (part time)
8. Employee parking (number): 12 plus City van and occasional other city vehicles
left overnight.
9. Customer parking (number): 123
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.):
i 1. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation:
. Small gymnasium
. Teen center
o Community group storage space
2
, 1.-- - C\ <\.
\..{~v
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site:
$49,000 (lease approximately -+,800 s.f. to Moundsview Schools and ACCEL
Academy
14. Structural condition of the building: Very poor!
" Roof leaks
" carpeting must be removed because of mold concerns
" windows are very energy in-efficient
" steam traps all leak and add to mold concern
15. Operational condition of the building: functions well for users but is very in-
efficient to operate.
16. Other issues
City of Rosevillc
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Parks and Recreation
Division:
NEW }~ACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed:
" 2001 for Administrative offices and community space
. 2002 for aquatics and recreational space
17. Size of new building (square feet):
" Administrative offices 1,500 s.f.
. Recreational space 25,000 s.f
It Aquatics 18,000 s.f.
" Community space 5,000 s.f.
" Art space 16,000 s.f.
3
. Community storage space 3,300 s.f.
. Child care area 1,000 s.f.
. Snack bar 1,000 s.f.
. Indoor play area 4,2000 s.f.
. Indoor Winter Garden s.f. ????
NOTE: Square foot estimates DO NOT include, lockerrooms, mechanical,
circulation, storage, reception spaces
These estimates are also based on the middle range of ultimate facilities.
18. Size of new site (acres): 4 acres (ramped parking)
19. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 14
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 17
21. Estimated customer parking (number): 400 (includes current 225 spaces at
Skating Center)
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.):
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation:
. Parks and Recreation Administrative Offices
. Community meeting space
. Leisure pool complex
. Recreational activity space induding fitness area, gym, indoor playground
. Arts space
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
25. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: $80,000
from recreational fees from pool and fitness areas. Potential additional funds
from leasing school or private accessory space.
26. Unique structures needed within new building:
. Parking ramp
. High ceilings for water slides in pool
. Gym with high ceilings for climbing structure and ball area
. Indoor playground
e Indoor winter garden
. Storage bays for ccrrmmnity group equipment
4
27. Unique operational improvements within new building:
. good connections between activities.
. Like concept of administrative offices, storage space and meeting rooms
being added to north end of OVAL.
28. Unique land/siting issues:
. Green space and outdoor assembly space.
. Good pathway connections
29. Other issues:
. Connections to Central park
. Private restaurant and physical therapy clinic added
Q :ICITYC ENT\C ityCenterDistrictAsJessments(042299),doc
5
CJ~~I/ &
q;fj; Jr"~ . .. . . ... .O-G 1M~_ . cJ-I[I'i 1 '1'1 '__ _ _. .. __ '.
~~ .. ---,.. - -.., - , ,-- -,
.L. G:~ Ct ~kA. ~~ ~. ___. _ _._ ,__ _ . _ .. ,__ _. ,_ _., .., .. _
.. ". ~k~cQ ~ ~ _ ___ _. ' __
, '_~'_'~_ ~~_~~ u n" ,,___,___.,__.
Q. Q~~":;). (~~~, do~t wo~) ___. _,
, . ,ud.._ -pO<J\A~~ _ _ _ ,.' _ _ _ _
~~~ ~~~ e. _~~ ~ .~_~~~ crf,u4L~W:l?t ~~ (~Le-k,h~Y\" .
; ~" t.', ~ -w&e.&,cJ__~~ !!~,V-~1o~,<b~~~- \f0AY:
, ,'J. ~f~et_ttf~~tt.t:'-- CO~n\~Vl~.--- -,,---- -------
, "nn~.-CQ~le;tL~~~~~,~~,--.------ ,__,_,
L. ~4-~~~.~ea~ ~,., ,-_"-
. , .' ,,;r._'Y\~_~~_-=-- . __,____,__ _.'__,.._,__,__
j~q~.~. ,- ----+-~~-~~-~-~~~~,_...
~~. . k.w.,Q-ru.~~ ~ l'1..~iw'1~) ...
,~\, ... "'. . ,..- -~.a~~~l2>~~. (1,~i.~~..::-~~)-,--.
.~~t:u .. _.~ ~~...~~_....:ttj~--. ...__
_~~~~.....~.~~~co le~... ... .....
. ....._.-.__._....~,..._- - - - ------ _.--_.- - - -~ --".---- ----- - -- -. +- -.---.-. ---- --- ~- - -- -'- - - -- -- ~ -' -- - _. .- -- .
'1. Y~..- '11~ ~ .~"\ ~ e."t( 1s~ (C4<~ ')... . '--
." '.-, ..- ,~. .. -~jL1t:~-~~~ ~~~ ~c.l.___, ,.-.----,-,--
.. u. u. .._ '~-d.,<~~~u1L~~\M ~~~s,"J~c2.L.'Iolftw.)..)..
. ,-,---.. ,. '. . ~ -: '- -~-~ ~~c2 v...r ~ -.,- - - , ,n.
,_._,,_ __"_.,_~., ~.J ,~ ~~~j,~"'------.-. ___ ______ __.. _ __ '_" _ .__
... .. j.~~~.c..~.It~ ..~.I">cWl~. ... u.__" . u.'.
-- ..: ..u~~J...~ ftv./~-\:A~~-~-~ .
u. .... -m-~.~K'-~4:h2 ee... ~t~~~~:.~-~-.n...O\-
rA .0\:.
_ _ _ ---- -,<.. --, ---------- u. _ _ _. __n___ ,---'. .... ----- n -.-, ,- '\f(\ \ -- ,-
"---..-.-- ----- ----_.-
----- -- -. -- --~.._-- ~'.-
-- ._-----.._-_..-.~--
__., _.._.,. _._._______.___n...____ .
"_.-.- - ..----.-.-
-----.---.------.--.-,--,--.--"--- . _... -----_... '---'---"~'-'-"
.-.- -.,----.--- -- --... .-
. -.-.. --- .----.
-_.._~._-------------_.--.---.- .-
--_..- --.-..--- -
---.- ...-. -.'~._-_. ---,.. --..---- ,....__.~---...--.._....~..--._----,_.
----_......_---,- ._.-
-~.._.._~~~._.__..-
---.--.--.-------...
---"-~----'-" '--'---'- ..--- -_._--
_~_~ ____. __ ..__u______.___.u_ __..__.__
-------_.-..~'-.._._..__.._.- ---.
--"-"--.-'-" .---.-.
----------.-..---.....-----------------..-.-- ..---.-.--- _. ._--- .---
--.----.----
- _..__.~._..- ....- --_.~_._-----
-------_.~--
---.-.---------. -,---_. --. _.._-----_._--...~_.. .__._-~._,..._.
- -----_..----
--,---_. - -'.- ._-
-----.-----. ----------~.__._--- -------------. .--
- ._--~--
._..~...._--------,,---- .~---
--------.-- .._~
-----.------. -----,-...---..-------.-.-.--..---.--.-,---..-.-
-.--------.-.- - -.---'---
__.._.__._..w.....__..___ _ _,_w________
.. ..--.---..-..--
---_._--_._----~.-. -"'- --~_._._--_._---_.~--_._--- _...~-
..,~,---_._.-._._--~-~._,-
----~._-,-
_.._.._~.~---_.__. -
- -._---- ...._--
- ------ - .----
,-->---_._._--~_._~.~.._..._-,---_...._--,._------_.__.~-" --'---,-.--.
_.._".....__._,.,-,._._-~-----_.-_. ---------.-
--.--.---.-..--- '-.. --- --.. ~_.-._- -.- -- .----- -----
-~._~.,---,-_.~--_.--------_.._-_..__._.-.-_. -,_..'_.._-----~ -. --.---..-- ..---.---.-..
-..------.. .- --.-..--.---"
_..______._.a
-------_.-.._---_..,---~~._-,
-_.-.-.~._~--------,~~-_._---._------ --
--- - -------.-----------.-
-.-.--.---'-
-~_._---------.,--.,--_._--..~--.~._--.._-_._.----_._--_. ,,- . ------.--- ~_.._~-_. -.-. ----- -_._---_._--,---~
.------..- -_.__.~,--_.- -------...,.---.-.----
~
-----_. .-------------------------.. ----_.~---_.__.._---".__.__._..._-----_._----_._------.~_._._.._---------------
._---~--,--- -----
-.------.---
___._....___..._____ _._.____._.._ - ___.. ._.-'__'_U__ _ _ .____._ ______ _ _.________.___ ___ ___ __.__~____~_ .___ _~___._
-'-.--,-.--.-
.._._--------,-~~,_._--. ..~.---- - - ---------..--.-.-..,--
.----- ...._-_. ...------..... -_._~_._--_..-
------. -----.-- ----,---.-- ------ _.-
---- .---
--,_..~._--_.._~---_.--~---_._-~------
-_.__.~_. ...----- ...-.---------- -----.-
------
---------.-.--
.--.....--._-_._------ -------.-----.-----
-------- --~--- --~----~._-------
._,..~_..~-_._-~.._----~. ._--_.-...~._._._--,-,_...
_-.- ----~--,_._---.._-,_.
-------------_._~---_..~ --- ._-_...-- --.-...--,--
_..._,------.._--
w___~_____._ ._'__~____'____W_,w__._____._.______.___,____._.________ ___._._.________.__..__..____ ____
------~...-_.__...._--,---- -,.-
---,,--...----..
--_._-------.,----- ---".._~'-_.
...- ..-.__.~.----_..--..-
-
.
City Center Task Force
Meeting #9 Notes
April 15. 1999
1. Call to Order: Chair Keith Wietecki called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall.
2. Present: Chair Keith Wietecki, Vice Chair Lois Sinn Lindquist, Pat Johnson,
Don Anderson, Scott Bergs, Jan Vanderwall, Joseph Smith, Perrie Heider, Peggy
Egli
Staff: Kim Way, Dennis Welsch, Sgt. Mike Palermo, Bob Murphy
Council: Barb Mastel
3. March meeting notes: Approved, with Chair Keith Wietecki being present.
4. Chair Keith Wietecki described the need to respond to the planning procedures. If
the Task Force proceeds without amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, there
may be a waste of time or usurp the public process. It will take three to four
months to proceed through the public review. Chair Keith Wietecki will update
the City Council on Monday, April 19th. He will ask for further direction.
Pat Johnson noted that at some point the Task Force will invite input from the
interest groups and residents. Could this be moved to the Planning Commission
for hearings? Could the boundary be sent to the Planning Commission. Peggy
Egli felt the interest groups could add more detail to the uses needed/desired on
the site.
Don Anderson suggested that interest groups should be involved early; perhaps to
move forward on the geography and the improvements. This is an opportunity to
gain input on "the sense of place". The drawings and the new text will help
describe the site.
~~
0\~'
Page 1 of 3
Jan Vanderwall noted that the five phase process was part of the original charge.
By stopping, do we lose some of the momentum? Pat Johnson agreed that
momentum is important and meetings with the public should continue.
The phases of the Charge are:
Phase l(a)
Phase I (b)
Phase l(c)
Phase 1 (d)
Site Assessment
Baseline Data
Public participation
City Center Vision
Phase 2
Development Analyses
Phase 3
Develop Master Plan Alternatives
Phase 4
Master Plan Formulation
Phase 5
Documentation
Chair Wietecki asked staff to prepare the documentation on existing conditions.
Staff had asked that a vision be created first, then tested against the existing
conditions.
Chair Wietecki noted the conditions of Park and Recreation buildings are
inadequate for today's operating conditions. The next step should be to record the
economic, operations, conditions and functional condition of the city buildings.
Chair Wietecki suggested a standard recording format for each of the city
facilities. The school facilities should also be documented.
Pat Johnson asked if the meeting notes could be used for background.
Jan Vander.vall asked if staff could bring together a summary of background data
and combine it with pictures of the sites.
Don Anderson noted that the Park and Recreation Committee did document the
need for new facilities in 1995-1996.
Lois Sinn Lindquist noted that original input was to be easily accessible reaction
from citizens and interest groups, not necessarily a set of hearings. Focus groups
may sell the process and add momentum, while giving the Task Force
confirmation of direction.
Chair Keith Wietecki suggested interest groups be invited in May. Peggy Egli
suggested a brief overview to be sent with invitations to the interest groups for the
Page 2 of 3
next meeting, May 20th, and may carry on to the June 17th meeting. Written
comments would also be invited. Reactions will be sought concerning the limited
facilities and conditions, and how to expand the City Center site in concept form
to concentrate services in this area.
Jan Vanderwall suggested a presentation with Kim providing ten minutes of
pictures/concepts.
5. The Task Force reviewed and revised the draft City Center District. A general
discussion of procedure ensued. The preamble was discussed.
(At the March meeting, the Task Force identified the geographical boundaries of
the district.)
Two approaches to the review and adoption of" district" language were
discussed. The Task Force requested staff to prepare" district" language and send
it to Task Force members for review and comment in the next week. The Chair,
Vice Chair and other volunteers (Scott Berg) will review and resolve language
differences.
At the next meeting, the Task Force should have full background in time to put
together a presentation for the interest groups. In this planning process, the
Planning Commission will hold hearings and the City Council will hold public
discussions. The planning process will remain amendable as new information
becomes available.
The next meeting will include a presentation on needs, with the interest groups
and the broader audiences requested to comment and provide direction. Kim Way
will present general design criteria.
6. Next Meeting. The Task Force will meet next on Thursday, May 20, 1999, from
6:30 to 9:00 p.m. Interest groups and citizen/residents will be invited to
comment. Staff to prepare room for audience participation.
Q:\CITYCENlITASK FORCE NOTES_04.15,99,doc
Page 3 of 3
...
:; Qj
(,j '"
.... 0
c.. eo
~ : ~
.... =
o 0
=;.:,1\
.9 1i QI 'C
~ !:I.~ (,j
~I:-g~
~ i:.I (\I Q
.... ~
o =
S '5
.... QI
E-t=
-a ...
= =
o QJ
1:3 (,j s
;a;ES
"t:I = 0
<:i:.IU
.... ~
o =
~ .C
~ ~
i:.I=
Qj
~
o .S<
.. (,j
~ ....
o t:
=~
0"\
0"\
0"\
,...;
00
C'I
:-:::1
I-<
~
~
c:I
;,; 0
= Q/)
.9 c
.. ....
'" ~
~QI
~a :::E
...
a Qj
(,j '"
.... 0
c.. eo
~:~
.... -g =
0=0
= f ....
.9 QI ,~
~ !:I. -a (,j
(,j I: ~ ~
~i:.I~Q
'"0 ~
QJ .C
S ~
E=:=
-a ...
= =.... ~
o QI 0 =
.~ .~ S QI....
;a:cs (,j~
"t:I=o dQl
<:i:.IU s:=
Qj
~
o ,S<
.. (,j
~ ....
o t:
=~
;,;
=
o
,...
..
'"
QI
a
~
<:
0"\
0"\
0"\
,...;
00
C'I
:-:::1
I-<
~
Q)
..
c:I
o
Q/)
I::
~,~ fA
v\: }-~ .U\
--DRAFT -(04/22/99)
City Center District
The City of Roseville adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, attaching an
implementation strategy to create a master plan for a city center to be located generally
around the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road "C".
The City Council created a citizen task force in 1998 with a charge to define the city center
concept, identify the community needs, and more specifically locate the district. The City
of Ros eville , and a Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Planning Grant provided funds
for this task force study.
In May, 1999, the Task Force completed phase onc of the study approving and
recommending adoption of the purpose, market/users, uses, and location of a City Center
District,
PURPOSE OJ:<" DISTRICT:
The purpose of the City Center District is to create a centraliy located area within
Roseville with a unique sense of community, a gathering place with social intimacy: a
destination which focuses on community participation and meetings. recreation.
government services, and may have complementary educational, retail and housing uses.
MARKET AND ANTICIPATED USERS:
The market and users for this district are residents of Roseville, the adjacent communities and the
regional, national, and world-wide users of the specialized services otfered within the district.
PLANNED USES WITHIN DISTRICT:
The planned public and privately owned uses foreseen within this district are envisioned to be a:
. source of pride
. communal gathering place; a hub of Roseville community activity for all ages
. center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
. locale for the developmt:nt of mental and physical health
. venue for government, education, cultural, and sport activities
. marketplace for complementary services and goods
. intergenerational residential living of varied styles
U\.. d--)- -C\ C\
CATEGORIES OF VISION. IDEAS. SPECIFIC USES:
1. Uses will be both indoor and outdoor.
2. City support services (roads, paths, parks, utilities, and safety) will be an integral
part of the design.
3. Operational/maintenance features will be designed with efficiency and
functionality.
4. Emphasis will be placed on tone, character, sense of place, ambiance.
5. There will be both active and passive areas
6. Design will include expansion flexibility
7. The site will be a "site for all seasons", featuring seasonal events.
8. The public and private sectors will playa role in the design, financing and
construction either through collaborative work or partnerships.
9. Efficiency, durability, and longevity will be a part of all design.
Examples of specific uses identified for the City Center include the following:
1. Government Center
Updated fire/police facility; updated goy'ernment complex - state, city, \..Ounty:
government center schools; county service center
2. Communi!)' Center
Meeting rooms; teen center; service center; multi-purpose rooms; child care facilities;
volunteer organization spaces; performance theatre; seminar theater; art/history center;
home/garden education facility; continuing education community center; Transit Village
- a major transit facility, possibly Light Rail or Commuter Rail; conference facility:
solarium; storage space for center organizations; religious facility; CTV, city. cable
syskm; public access studio; satellite postal service; Mini-Conference Center; gallery
area; neighborhood promotion; massage center; community nurse/health services;
kitchen! reception area; technology center - internet access library; charter schools
3. Recreation Center
Outdoor facilities; amphitheater; indoor swimming pool; indoor play area; indoor play
area and park; indoor termis, park and recreation center uffices; climbing wall, outduor
track; basketball/volleyball gym; child play area; craft castle or room; pri vate recreation
area; putting greens;
4. Complementary Retail
Food service/restaurants; neighborhood retail; kiosk/cart vendors; beauty! barber shops;
service-retail; home office service center
5. Complementary Housing
Mixed housing types for all ages and life styles;
2
6. Other Uses and Themes
Street level mixed use area; design that blurs distinction between indoor and outdoor;
specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; pathways between the facilities; land mark:
carefully planned parking facilities; a safe place to be; pathway access to community;
human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes; public art;
intergenerational activities/connections; aesthetic continuity to Central Park; quality
decorative ornamental lighting; design continuity; architectural design that breaks from
precedent; passive village square; design for flexible open ended growth; signage
(informational and directional); efficient street accesses; parkway-tree lined streets with
walkways; County Road C and Lexington as street entry with streetscape;
monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens; co-generation of energy.
DEFINITION OF THE DISTRICT (draft for consideration and inclusion in
Comprehensive Plan after a public hearing to be held Qn l\lay 12. 1999. by the
Roseville Planning Commission. with a decision by the City Council
anticipated May 24. 1999. or at a later dateJ
Within the City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan and Map, (Section 4, Subsection iI, pages t\VO
and three), the listing and description of Land Use Categories is hereby amended to add the "City
Center Land Use District" as follows: This district, with a boundary as described above and
consisting of approximately 121 acres, shall be defined as a mixed use area wherein current and
future public and private uses may occur simultaneously and adjacent to each other. The uses
may include center(s) for the community, government, and recreation programs, with
complementary public or private housing, retail, transportation, and other uses as allowed in the
City Center District Zoning Ordinance. The site planning, design and architecture, and public
infrastructure investments shall be consistent with a master plan for the area. It is anticipated that
the zoning for this district will be a Planned Unit Development. All new developments will be
reviewed as an amendment to the PUD.
PUBLIC PARTICPATION AND INPUT P.ROCESS
Process continues with notice, displays, public meetings, and video of meetings; invitations and
discussions with interest groups and residents at May 20th meeting; Planning Commission to hold
public hearings on addition of" City Center District" to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
LOCATION OF DISTRICT:
The location of the City Center District is the area shown on the attached map and generally
described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of Howard Johnson Park along Woodhill
Drive, east along the Woodhill Drive right-of-way (and also including the VFW, Shopping
Center, and Veteran's Park north of Wood hill Drive) to Victoria Street; then south along Victoria
to the intersection with County Road "C"; then west along the south right-of-way line of the
BNSF railroad right-of-way (and also including the Roseville Mobile Home Park adjacent to the
railroad right-of-way) to a point of intersection with a line extended south along the west
property line of Howard Johnson Park; the north along the west edge of Howard Johnson Park to
3
the point of beginning.
Because street views and entries to the City Center play an important role in the "sense of place".
the district includes the right-of-way of Wood hill Drive from Hamline Avenue to Victoria Street;
County Road "C " from Hamline A venue tu Victoria Street, Lexington A venue from County
Road "C-2" to Highway 36; and Victoria Street from Woodhill to County Road "C",
Q:\CITYCENT\Cit)' Center District.ed3(042199),doc
4
"0
"0 fa
fa v gf
~ g 'u
u '" ';8
~:iS i:: I': ,d
.~ ~ ~ <;:: Ii.~
't 0) c::":.2 i(j
~ t lil~
"0 'E' ~.8 0..0
.._~_(/)" ~ ~ tI.O~b~
_ OJ) c:: c:: .- 0..
'E '~?A .~ ~ ~ ro
- "0 ..: '" O;J....;:: 2
rn" ~ B~.?;-~roQ)
~ g ~.- '" ~ ;> ~
. a ~ 0)]"'" ~ '.g ::>
5 0.. .~ ..c:: ,_;> '::;: c:: 0.. .... i:;>
o '" '" u '" OJ ~ .2 '::;'
'E .;3 ~ 0)" gj r:;:: ~.~ '" a:;
g~ :::> C::0..c::",,,,=0J)
"Oa ~ 1tj B ~ .9 == ~ 8 g
~ c::c"''''2..c::-
"g 0) o"';j....uOJ)"O
....0 '.) "O~o..<8~::sa
g ..::.. ;j ~.+:: ~ 0) 0) ]
] ~ ~ ~. ~ OJ'~ ~ ~ ~
u . c: o....c:: "0" .- .... _
~ .~ ~.t; 2 0 ~ '" s..s:g
..0 ~ '~.g ...::;:: ~ .S 2 ] 'Qj 3
O)..."Ot;j~;::..o_ ",c::"O"
~ ~.s .~ ] .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ 'B g
:$ ~ ~ e .9 ~ Q) ~'!i1 ~ E .~
t/J Q) "0 ~ ~ ...... en U
~.~'go0.3 8] iG]] 58
~Uo.. O-oWf-;Of-;f-;uW
t;j
...
OJ)
0)
.5
a
0)
..0
~
rJ:J
~
rJ:J
;;;;>
U
~
~
~
U
~
~
rJ:J
rJ:J
-0(
~
::i
~
Z
o
~
rJ:J
>
~
o
rJ:J
~
ca
o
C-'
~
E-o
-0(
U
'""'
;>,
~
'"
"0
a
"""';C"'i
....;
~"';..or--:oO
-
Qo,
a-,
--
N
N
--
...,.
c
J
~
~
~
I
I
b
'i
..
..
=
..
bJ)
"0
= $
= =
bJ)~
=-
:fi~
.s.s~
= t
..,:-=~
g:;~~
-c
.S '<3 ~
; = g
==.su
.. "0
;> = =
'r;;..! =
==.."
1 t ;
"-"
.. '" ;>
0..=0(
a a =
0=0
~..biJ
.1,:: ~.9
~ !3 ~
Q..s~
0;>,0
~ if ~
a,;, ..... ....
-0:-
~ ~ ~
~ = t
o 0 -
~ ;:: .5
.... = ..
o=..c::
.€ e;
u .. =
..i5.:::
~.5 ~
...
CJ
.....
~
...
rI:J
.....
~
~
~
...
==
~
U
~
.....
U
..
~E'"
=u"O
~ =
c1.E
'<3 ~ ~
~...:"'C
oS 'c .;:
.. _ 0
= '" ..
=:0=
.. .. =
"O..c::=
o - ..
.... .. e"
.. -
~~:
= .s "2
.c ;>, =
~ = =
.:~=:
.... <<: ~
.- ..... ...
:t ~ ';';;
go=..=
~ '" ..
~....c::
-....
= 0 ..
';;; 8 a
~"Oo
.s;~
.::.: v;'y
'" "0 =
.s..=
= ~ 0
.. u
.~ C =
.~'c .;!
C'.J =:.=
= a 0
~8g.;.:,
1; 8 .; "0
....~=
b-=~~
.... = ..
'<3 .c "0 ~
=: =..~
===-
~~~.;;
c .-: ~ .s
._ Q. 4,) ~
u..~:E
.. ~~,-:
.c 0 .... 0
~ '" 0....
0'
OD
c::
.~
.9
~
0)
.;3
0)
"0
:::
U
.S
...
0)
'E
<!J
U
;>,
....
u
0)
.;3
...
<8
"0
Q)
!B
c:
0)
::a
'"
'"
'"
=
'"
=
'<3
..
0..
'"
0-0
o
'"
Q)
15..
~
~
W
;.:;
c:
:::
o
u
~
'u
0)"
E
'"
I
~
0)
15..
8
o
u
E ~
~@
0) Q)
;> u
~'~
"0 '"
0) ;>,
~~
g.g
~ir
'" _ 0
~ 'u,.8
=..s~
QI 0) ...
U .~ Q)
o~
..e-u
0) .....
~ 5
] ~
~ ~
~~
-
==
QI
e
=
'"
QI
~
C-'
...;
..
..
-
=
..
u
C
-gu
os 0:
bJ)....
= 0
.- =
6 .~
.. ....
=..=
~~
;>'''0
"0 =
.s 0:
'" '"
.. ..
..c:: '"
.... =
.... '"
o ..
.. ..
= '"
o =
..';:;
~~
..c:: ..
=..0:
"0 8
~ ~
.. '"
is. 0
8 e-
o :::>
'" =..
.. ..
"'..c::
.. ....
0....
... 0
..:.:: =
~ .g
~Q.
.. 0
..c::"O
_ =
~:
~ .-
~"O
- =
~ ..
;>'8"':
~ 8.1:
.-:; 0-
'" '"
.sti:S
Q)
OJ)
Ct5' ti" ~ Q
:_E~>~~~ '"
<.J ~ :.:: ..g ca rn'" '0
'u i::"{jj'u u 100 ~ 0
..s 0 fa..s >; j,; '> "5
v.....~Q).~Ei.-4{/)
~t~@~"d~~
:E t:~u8]~
u t' 8 g ." ~.:e ."
"'..... _ ~~ U._ >. ~ 11) ~
Q)~ O>.~~~s
8 .;3 '@ ~:;:: c:: ::1..0
8~8~J1~~~
~.s e B ~ 'E '8 ~
o 8 0 ::: 0 ,- ::1 u
~ Q) ~ 8 '@) ~ s g
0.:"..08~,-,S't)
..!. ~ '.g 8 ...,~ 8 E
3]g6~tt.~_
8....."0 0 "'<c
,,; Q' ~.t;'.g "i 0) I
~ ~ .S p:: .~ ~ u t
o:J~g.E8P.~C:
u t: .~ .~ f.D 2 ~ B
8~g~o;s~~
t::<!Ju1:>t2S~
': ~ ~ ~ ~ fi5 i::""O
~ ~);: VJ U 0".9..2
Q)~C,)&~~ou
'" c: 0..<.S "<2 =' 82
Q) {/) C ~ !l) ~ 0 .....
~ C,) c: 0'- Q V) ~ ~
= .:: ,S: '+:: '5 8. r! 0. ~
QlO)"f.i"'''''''u-.:l
u2Ng4"<ouO'::
:" '0 "O:~ :>JJ ~ ,.8 .S:
C S oj 0) .:: ~,~ 5 15.
"-o/jl)ddO-.J:JO.)
=05~.)::t).g~~
= .... t ~ 5 ef 0..!:P ...
e gf 2 ~'~ ::: 8' ~ ~
e '01 3 ~ 8'~ 2 of.8
OCl)-~~-{/)Q).B
U::E~.8I~~~:;;a
M
~
U
~
~
E-o
rJ:J
~
Q
~
o
~
rJ:J
o
=..
~
;J
=..
.;
Q)
'" '"
;.:; ~
s:= ~ .5
:.s ,5 a ~
'~.5'~ ]
~t;j~]
~ '(3 ~ C:j
o f,...,. ._
"B '" "'"
~;S6hi)
u'~'B ~,
-;'13~~
::; ~ 8.S:
J::: c.. "'t:J <<i
Bgfag
8 '5 S ~
'" .s .+:: ""
Q) '" '" a
~ OL).~ c
t) ~ '€ E
B 6", 0)
.- 0..-
,~ ~,~ 8'
U s::i 0
'5 8 3 u
'" g 8 ~
~'E@~
~ ~ ~ ~
0) .:: 0 a
u~r!"O
,Q~:ga
uO'"u","
Q) '0 <8 ~
.;3 ::: ..c:: 'E
'E~~~
1A ;:: .:: c:
o Q) 0 0)
~ a '.g ~
~ [; .S ~
~~t);>
f-;c::.::~0J
rJ:J
~
~
rJ:J
;J
~
~
E-o
-0(
~
-
U
~
E-o
Z
-0(
~
Z
<
E-o
~
~
~
-0(
~
100
11/
....
=
III
U
=
.S;
....
CIS
11/
..
CJ
QI
~
c::
;>, ... 0
~ g'~
0.."0 ~
... ..... u
o ::: 0)
00...
] -"' Q)
.- --; ~
OJ' ;:: .~
~gfo..
;>,:is a
~ a 0
0..;.:: 0
... u ...
o .... &-.
o '" 0
"OCJJ~
.S i:E '"
~"' 0 ~
8 t) ~
0...... '"
100 ~ t;
.:: u
's 8 ~
a '+:: ~
.~ i'J >.
V) t3 C'j
S2:~
0"0::9
"Oc:::.2
,S '" u
," ~ 8"
t '" ;>,
O;J 0.. OJ)
o ","
.;3 '2 ]
i~]'
~ 50
~"'.g ~
.:!:!.S '"
.-:= . '" ..D
:::~~
u a..:.:
..s 0.. gj
"'"0..0
g 8 ."
"0",":':
'5GJ~
o ~ p
t-i
Q)
.;3
]tJ
~ '5
.3 ~
'0 Q)
:::.;3
8 c
@:S
~ '~
!3-g
u ...
~~
'" 0
o '"
.;3 ~
';>
~ &-.
';> ~
0)"0
VJ Q)
o .~
e:t;j
o 'u
'" Q)
E ~
0) Q)
~-5
0)0-0
... 0
Q) '"
~ t
..... '"
u :::
'S d)
","0
:a .~
"'-0
~a::
... 0
<2 ;::
","0
t ~
'"
:::t;j
"0 .::
8 ,S:
Q)~
-'"
~~
a g
0) .@)
..c Q)
f-; ...
~
U
~
~
E-o
rJ:J
~
~
z
~
=
E-o
~
~
rJ:J
~
rJ:J
;J
~
~
~
-0(
..;I
~
itJ"
0.
o
..c::
'"
...
Q)
..0
a
..0
~
'"
<!J
..0
","
...
o
"0
.::
Q)
;>
'g
u
:;;:
'"
o
:;;a
'"
0)
'E>
'"
~
"0
a
C"I
'"
c::
Q)
0)
...
OJ)
OJ)
.::
.~
0..
OJ'
0)
~
'<<;
't)
... ...
-.:12
o .::
o 0
13 u
.8 ,~
-&~
_.~ ~
'; c:: 0)
~ rn ~
~~"O
tSQ
~ '" S
~ t) 9
= ~....
QI---
e.~ .~
~ ~ ~
=-~b
e "0 u
Q o'~
U~~
'"
0fIJ>
= ~
'r;;
=t;j
Q ...
=<2
'"
C8.
.5~
= OJ)
QI ,S
e ;g
QI 0
'C.;;
e 0)
Q .~
U::E
..;
.n
0:;
o
..0
B
"'0
~
o
'(jj
.;;
c::
0)
Q)
~
'"
o
:>JJ
'"
t;j
...
<8
~
:~ ~
() en .~
~.~ :~
.~ >.s t)
3[)~~
s 00 QJ t::
~ .;;J_ ..c:: 0 VJ
_~,,=o.."'t)~
OC:::ucno~
(.) ~ 'V) ~ ~ ~
~VJ>'- r.fJ
~~,&~-g-g
~ 0 ~ e : .~
C26'~a8;>
~ .~ CTj 8 'E ~
.od)t=d~~
::: "0 E .g >. ,-
-;]t;~S~
gC::t;j
g .~ ~ -g 8 .~
Q..~8-:~~
OJ)'- go ~ S"r;J
c:::~~~o~
'5 8 ~ ~ ~ ~
0.;3 u"O 0 0-
::a ~ .8 0 ;> .... .S:
:5.bJ)~.s~8~
4-oI--;-1-I1-I~1-I
o=<8<8op"~
- ~...... C1)
~~t~~~~
~ 8 ~ ~ ~ g .~
~<(f
'^-
tJ
'S
'"
:a
'"
~
c::
;S
.~
.::
Q)
0)
'"
~
<2
'"
Q)
'"
:::
"0
0)
c::
~
o
;>,
]
'"
;>
'c
0..
"0
8
.~
::i5
:::
0..
"0
Q)
c::
8
15..
Q)
..c::
f-;
. . . . . . .
cb
:::
'2
:::
'50
<U
..0
<<-<
o
i:i
'0
p..
<U
-5
"v i)
U IV
ro .i:;J
c.. (/] ~
'0 .~ g
~~U
~;; 6,
,'" o.g ~
Q)-Q)"'t:j;
-5~;jro
.5 ~ ~ ~
<U;>;>>.
"0 <C< i:i
'- (1) s:: ::s
-=.90
1ii:..::: 01) U
1:: p.5 0
o ~ ~ .-
p..::r: <U-
.5 6 -:]
co!)'1:J
~ ~ ~ g
~~~~
c..'c '" 6
.... Q'C 0
~-.9<t:
~ :2 .~ ......
U-g>~
>-'00-
.<;:: ~ ;; V)
U <<-< ;::3.~
lj022
->.;>u
o '" -< ;.::
- ~ <U......
.~ ~ ~]
.:: ..!. F= CIj
::: ..::: o:! .,
~,~::r: ~
1ii lj 6 ~
'" _ 0 ~
~~<l::..:::
.~ -g U :i
!) '0:; ~
<U ,5 -0 -
.p ....... C!j...
~.~ ~ ~
'" _ >.S-!
~~i:i;'
u ;j ro
<U <U 0 0
cc-5uo::
~
8
b
U
~
z
UJ
u
>-
I-
9
6
u
.g
0::
e>-
N
....
~
~
13
.~
is
"1
Q,I
e
Q,I
-=
E-o
't:S
C
~
"1
Q,I
"1
;;;I
I-
Q,I
-=
o
-i 6-5
~ E i- 0 .g .~
~ ] .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0-6 cr~c:::- c::
-0 '" ....0 01) '" <U
a :_E 8 .., ~ Ctj .~ 13 (u"' cc;
.... .8 1:: p.. -5 ..c.5 ~ c:
g '(3 '" ro "@ S, ~ ~ fA.9
-tjc.E CJ"J U '-~::> cu-"'Cd
c: Q) 8 - c: 'C;; 8: '- Q) '-
._ _ ~,,~ ~ ,..,n! Q) Q)
c: -:::: ~ ~ u v ....u ;. p c:
~~~~.8e:g~~~
Z ~ ] ~ >..a ~].<;:: 8
~d)caa'3~c~~cn
Oc: -; p.. -5 .5:.a ~ it) t ~
_uo<u:::-o
'B ~] ca g ~ Q) ~ Q) ~
::: ~ 0 ,;:! u .,:D 8 ~ 01)
''::; ...c:: ..........c: u >"~ Q ,g ;>-.
~ s. ~ s'~'~ Q) C'j CI] c+:::
CI] ."'~ OJ)-:S ~e+:: 'E en ~
52 Q.,8.~'g~ ~ cd E
:O::::~OcdO Cl:Js:::...c
;> cd +-I on (,) s:::: c: .s "'d
Cd ~ r.n "'d CJ"J s:: .~ !1J OJ) s:::
-:5 0 cd ; 5.SO ~'(3 c ro
s:: ~ CI] CI] ''::: en "'d ~ .~ ~
.~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ (J ~ ~ ~
'" .;:: .- .i:;J 2 1<3 ^ -0 0
~f1=G o;,j);j-C:~
~ ro oj) u.5 cr ro ro ..
~"' :"9 ~ .5 ~ .:c: en 25 ~
<U 0 01)::= <U ._~ <U .;:: U ro
1<3 ::: .5 ~ :; ~ ~ -g ~
Q) 100-0 ~ ;> ~:::: '- 0'-
~ .g @ ~ '<3 i:i .;; :.s 0:: ~
-0 .;g p.. p.. ro <U <U -0 >',ro
~ Iii -g ~ "@ E.::: 1ii i:i ~
'g E @ ~ 8 ! ~ ro g ;
ro ro <u.;:: 23 ~ c: u CJ)
1) E Q. ca fS (!) ."'.9 (,) E
[; ~ ~ ~ ~.:= ~ (;j ~ (l)
~~21ii~'f:!-gE~g
<uu<u61;:;Ou<8=C:
~ ~ ~ ::s C g ~.5 ~ ~
v. '" u"::: ._ -0 p.. '-' ;> _
\0
Q,I
.S ;S
~
....
~
I-
o
0\
0\
0\
....
o C "'d (l) c;j
Z9 1ii -5-5cu
?3 ~"'O ~ ~ .5 ~ "tj .D
CJ)"::: c: <U;j -g -g ; .~
~j~~~-5~.g:g~
::: .8 -g 'v <:i .~ "@ roo [i; E
.9 -0 '" 1;:;..::: g'j ~ ,;2 p..
t>.g~..cogVJ::J.:::~
~~]~~tn~j~t
{/)cIj~ca e~u~~
.[>.'" <u.8 p..-51<3 OJ ~
~~cIj~cc::o"O-5c
.9 ~ C""d ~ .,5 "0 a 0:;:
uo<::ro<Uroro~:::<+=<.....
~ ,~ g '~ :g' ~ d'.29 1ii E
-- ~ 0 ""t:j ~ .9 ~ 0.. v
0:..-..0 ro ::: -0 <Ii -0 ... 6
ro23ro~ro:::t ,<Up..
:2: ~..:::_ -0 >. ro 0 gf t=i..s
<U -;;; ,p.. ,- ;g <U
"0 ~ .~ ~ E ~ c ~ >
1iiu;>,.B0 cu1ii1iiroQ
c:~u~g6.i:;Jc..":::
~ ;:J'5 cu oj E '<U'<;::'-
p.. -0 .~ ..0 "3 ~ '@ .<;:: ~ :5
<U:::-O_Eo~"'i:i
,~ j .~ ] 't;) 00 io.o" ~ E ~
::: <<-< ..::: '" .... ;>: 01) f- .~ 5
<uof- ;j-::: ."'@
~ !:: tr) en 8 'E 'Cij ~ 5 -
.... 0 > ~ 0 ;j ;j cup..
p..._ ;> U >. E ..2 ~ <U ro
E o...s ro ro E <U .:::: ..0 <U
8 '6 ::8 N E 8 <Ii "'2 ~ ..0
'" '" ~ <U ,::: 0..::: ,-
~~ ro~~.g 5.gf~ ~
.~ -g .-g <Ii 8 .9 23 'c i:i u
'" ro .... 6 ro ~ u 0 <U E
~ gf.~'~ .::: ~:..::: N B ~
~ .; 0 e ~ 'E' ~ ."9 ~ en
~ ~ Q) 8: -g 'E ~ ~ ,5 :s
U'<;:: ..:::_cu ~ ~ ro ~ ~ is <u.9
'-' o.~ f1) C io.o s,.._
V "' C o.o::c"d IV ~.3
-5~jc;j.26c:g
c 1-0 ".,:: 0.. g 11) ~ t:
:.a oS ~,~ 11) ,- 0.. u CIJ
,~ "0 .... ~ ~ ~ E D ,i:
~[i;~82e8i:J]
:~
....
=
~
d
;:J
p..
<U
.g
.8
i:i
<U
6
-0
c:
<U
E
ro
c:
ro
'"
~ro
c:-o
'2 <U
o ~
N <U
Q) 'S:
-S ~
rJ1
rJ1
~
U
o
=:
~
E-o
;;;I
~
Z
....
Q
Z
<
Z
o
-
E-o
<
~
U
....
~
<
~
U
-
....;I
~
;;;I
~
-o~
@..:::
~ B
.g 5
,~'m s::
;> .~ 5:
.5 6 <U
.. 6 ;>
~Uci '(ij
c: :::
.- 01) <U
~ ,S ~
ec:p..
<<-< 1ii 6
~Q:;8
~onen
'S: '5 ~
-o~i:J
1ii 6 <U
"'~ -=
~o 0
c: N -
';:: ~:::
<U ro -
<U :2: .~
E.....~
u cIj.-
:..::: '" Q
.g E ~
p..~ i:i
ur 'r;) Q)
~~U
0.. '"0 C
,~ 1ii i:J
-0 j3,.'
.~ g '0
o 50 a
C t;j :€
~~:g
;> i:i ro
Vi ,_ C
~ -5 ~
.5 '~ gf
c: '" ....
o c: ro
u 0 <U
Vi 'C;; ..c
8 ~ ~
e]-g
p.. v p..
"'"
~
u
....
"
E-o
rJ1
....
Q
~
o
z
o
....
E-o
<(
U
o
....;I
.~ 0) 2
~ C -€ ~
~ 0 .'Q f1) B ~
;::::0CJ)>.g p..
i:! ~ ,5 CJ)...... i:i c:
iUOI)p..COCU"'o
c: c: p.. 0 <U,~ ~ '"
~..s ..2 "@ .5 -0 <U .E
-0 ro(/]o<:: >.ro-S~
1ii~:>g~]~-o
p..p..~",...:..p..:::8
;gc: ~o<u..s~
"'0>~..l.6ojo
-o~<u-5":::o..:::::r:
Q) ..E -5 ;,.:. ,9P::r: :; ~
-5~~8~~~~
~ "'0 .- 1-0 ..... ,- "'tj co
~1-"'gci5g~<LJ"O
<U ~ U ,~ '" :2: -g ~
..s 0 .S 0 ~ ~ ~ a3
a= ~.~~:= OJ ~
c: o"@>c:t,_s-s
~""-oo2'"
oEC:-ro~roOl)
~o~~r;jI1)~g
a1 ~ ~.t ~ .g '~"@ M
a~~=5~c::"€
lj~"a:;::-5:.s.g g
-- .... ....!.. ::a ," ~ U Q)
.~ g i1 0 L g ~ .g
1:) ~ 'C ~ ~ '~ ~ ji
'5 ~ <U ... [;j
Vi ~ ,2: ~ ~ ~ .- p...
iS~Q~O::~'O:::
~c:;::::1::o~i:i~
<;:: '2 .- g c: '-"0 :::
"'c::a ~>.p..":::
U<u.- 0"><: 0 ro ro 0
~o~u~ -,
ot:Q:>p....:::...:...8"E
,- ? tf) ,-::: 0..-... cIj
u ;n <U 'c: ~ ..l. ~ ~
<u:::.groc:i1~o
-5..s OJ) 1;:; 0 ,- ,,'. ::r:
4-1.......... t:: ..... ';:: I- -- 4---
o<8o<uu-090
:::","@>1Aro-<u
.9 ~ ..... "0 t ~ fn.5
~ ~ ~ a "E 'a 'C ~
g ~ 0)", s,..""~ ~ ~ t
- '5 ~ B -:s r./J 0 &
~ ~.~ ~ 9 z..!:: 8
f- -0 Q U - t:Q '~ p..
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION
DATE: 04/19/99
ITEM NO:
Department Approval:
~CriPtion:
Manager Approval:
Agenda Section:
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE PROGRESS
Attached is the draft report from the City Center Task Force work to date. Changes
may occur to this report after the April 15th meeting of the Task Force. Staff will
provide updates at the meeting,
The Task Force has been meeting since September 1998 and has nearly complete the
first phase of the project. The first phase was to define a vision and recommend any
changes necessary to the Comprehensive Plan or other Public Policy documents in
order to complete the City Center master plan.
Chairman Keith Wietecki, Vice-Chair Lois Sinn Lindquist, Planning Commission
Chair Craig Klausing and others will attend the Council Work Session on April 19th
to provide the Council with a progress report and seek further direction before
completion of the phase 1 tasks.
Q:\CITYCENT\Phase 1 Report(041999),doc
1
q<\
v\.\ 0\.'
--DRAFT--
City Center District
The City of Roseville adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, attaching an
implementation strategy to create a master plan for a city center to be located generally
around the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road "C".
The City Council created a citizen task force in 1998 with a charge to define the city center
concept, identify the community needs, and more specifically locate the district. The City
of Roseville and a Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Planning Grant provided funds
for this task force study.
In , 1999, the Task Force completed phase one of the study approving and
recommending adoption of the purpose, market/users, uses, and location of a City Center
District.
PURPOSE OF DISTRICT:
The purpose of the City Center District is to create a centrally located area within
Roseville with a unique sense of community or "place" and social intimacy; a location
which focuses on community participation and meetings, recreation, government
services, and may have complementary educational, retail and housing uses.
MARKET AND ANTICIPATED USERS:
The market and users for this district are residents of Roseville, the adjacent communities and the
regional, national, and world-wide users of the specialized services offered within the district.
PLANNED USES WITHIN DISTRICT:
The planned public and privately owned uses foreseen within this district are envisioned to be a:
1. communal gathering place; a hub of Roseville community activity for all ages
2. center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
3. locale for the development of mental and physical health
4. venue for government, education, cultural, and sport activities
5. entrepreneurial marketplace for services and goods
6. intergenerational residential living of varied styles
7. source of community pride
2
CATEGORIES OF VISION. IDEAS. SPECIFIC USES:
The Task Force felt the uses should include the following concepts
I. Uses should be both indoor and outdoor.
2. City support services (roads, paths, parks, utilities, safety) should be an integral
part of the design.
3. Emphasis should be placed on tone, character, sense of place, ambiance.
4. Activities should be identified for current and future users.
5. There should be active and passive areas
6. Whatever is designed should include flexibility for expansion
7. The site should be a "site for all seasons", featuring seasonal events.
8. The public and private sector should playa role in the design, financing and
construction either through collaborative work or partnerships.
9. Operational/maintenance features should be designed with efficiency and
functionality in mind.
10. Efficiency, durability, and longevity should be a part of all design.
Examples of specific uses identified for the City Center include the following:
1. Government Center
updated fire/police facility; updated government complex - state, city, county;
government center schools; county service center
2. Community Center
Meeting rooms; teen center; service center; multi-purpose rooms; child care facilities;
volunteer organization spaces; performance theatre; seminar theater; artIhistory center;
home/garden education facility; continuing education community center; Transit Village
- a major transit facility, possibly LRT, HR; conference facility; solarium; storage space
for center organizations; religious facility; CTV, city, cable system; public access studio;
satellite postal service; Mini-Conference Center; gallery area; neighborhood promotion;
massage center; community nurse/health services; kitchen/wedding reception area;
technology center - internet access library; charter schools
3. Recreation Center
outdoor facilities; amphitheater; swimming pool indoor; indoor play area; indoor park
indoor tennis, park and recreation center offices; climbing wall, outdoor track;
basketball/volleyball gym; child play area; craft castle or room; private recreation
area;putting greens;
4. Complementary Retail
food service/restaurants; neighborhood retail; kiosk/and select cart vendors; beauty and
barber shops; service-retail; home office service center
3
5. Complementary Housing
mixed housing types for all ages and life styles;
6. Other Uses and Themes
street level mixed use area; design that blurs distinction between indoor and outdoor;
specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; pathways between the facilities; land mark;
carefully planned parking facilities; a safe place to be; good path access to community;
human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes; statutes and outdoor art;
intergeneration activities/connections; aesthetic continuity in Central Park; good and
decorative ornamental lighting; design continuity; an architectural design that breaks
from precedent; passive village square; design for flexible open ended growth; signage
activities (informational and directional); good street accesses; parkway-tree lined streets
with walkways; County Road C and Lexington as street entry with streetscape;
monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens; co-generation of energy.
DEFINITION OF THE DISTRICT (for inclusion in Comprehensive Plan)
Draft to be prepared by staff, April 16 - 22, and distrbuted to Task Force members for
comments, additions, deletions
PUBLIC PARTICPATION AND INPUT PROCESS
Process continues with notice, public meetings, and video of meetings; invitations and
discussions with interest groups and residents at May 20th meeting; Planning Commission to hold
public hearings on addition of" City Center District" to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
LOCATION OF DISTRICT:
The location of the City Center District is the area shown on the attached map and generally
described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Howard Johnson Park along Woodhill
Drive, east along the Woodhill Drive right-of-way (and also including the VFW, Shopping
Center, and Veteran's Park north of Wood hill Drive) to Victoria Street; then south along Victoria
to the intersection with County Road "C"; then west along the south right-of-way line ofthe
BNSF railroad right-of-way (and also including the Roseville Mobile Home Park adjacent to the
railroad right-of-way) to a point of intersection with a line extended south along the west
property line of Howard Johnson Park; the north along the west edge of Howard Johnson Park to
the point of beginning.
Because street views and entries to the City Center play an important role in the "sense of place',
the district includes the right-of-way of Wood hill Drive from Hamline Avenue to Victoria Street;
County Road "C " from Hamline A venue to Victoria Street, Lexington A venue from County
Road "C-2" to Highway 36; and Victoria Street from Woodhill to County Road "C".
4
--DRAFT --
City Center Task Force Report
Notes Summarized by Dennis Welsch
April 5, 1999
BACKGROUND (June.1998) bv Bob Bierscheid
Over the past several years, the City of Roseville has invested much time and energy through
numerous attempts to defme its future. City Council planning sessions, specialized committees,
consultant reports and the Recreation Infrastructure Committee have been extensions of direction
received in the VISTA 2000. One common thread of each of the processes has been the
recognition of the need for a core community area that is generally described as "City Center."
This vision is more than a community center, more than a modern city hall, more than a
supporting business district and more than a quality residential site. It is an integration of an of
these activities into a blended formula of play, service, commerce and habitation in a commons
so coordinated that all of these functions thrive and grow synergistically.
Although the key ingredient for the well being of the community will continue to be the strength
of neighborhoods, studies of healthy communities reveal a common thread in that they all have a
thriving community focus. Several other Twin Cities communities, such as Shoreview,
Maplewood and Chaska have developed highly developed community centers. These efforts have
relied totally on public spending and government management to provide services. A few cities
including the St. Paul Town Square project, Edinborough in Edina and the Lifetime Fitness Center
in Plymouth have attempted integrating commerce and government into a common delivery
system. The general purpose of the proposed City Council action is to initiate a process to explore
Roseville's response to the "City Center" concept with the understanding that planning, design
and implementation of the community's vision will be staged over time.
"City Center" is envisioned to be a:
-communal gathering place
-center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
-a locale for the development of mental and physical health
-major venue for state, national and international cultural, sport and business activities
-an entrepreneurial marketplace for services and goods
-residential living of varied styles
-source of community pride
-hub of Roseville community activity
The current Civic Center has provided some of these elements but has been limited because of a
lack of long range comprehensive planning and the essential critical mass of activities and services.
Using the four corners concept, this area has these significant attributes:
5
1. The natural resources and beauty of Central Park
2. The surrounding developable space
3. The existing infrastructure including the unique features of the Skating Center and
City Hall.
4. Healthy nearby residential neighborhoods
5. The most important of all elements, the central community location. The founders of
the community recognized the importance of centrality when they chose this site as
the civic center. During the developing years, the city has capitalized on the location
through the construction of key civic facilities and the establishment of major vehicular
and pedestrian thoroughfares that make this area the most accessible in the city.
Through careful planning, these resources can be used to build a quality City Center capable of
making Roseville a strong, viable, livable community for many generations to come.
CITY CENTER PRINCIPALS
In order to maximize the special opportunity available to our community, "City Center " will be
based on these guiding principals. The general objective is to develop a community hospitality
center that would involve all of the community, broaden the base of participation and involve
opportunities for public, private, and not-for profit investment:
. Community Participation-Pathways to New Opportunities
The City Center process must not only allow, but rather demand continued
extensive participation by all segments of the community. Community groups,
neighborhoods, businesses, civic leaders, the Chamber of Commerce and individual
citizens all have a common stake in the future core of our City. More, rather than
less, citizen involvement will characterize the success of the project. It is
envisioned that numerous, simultaneous but interconnected planning and discussion
efforts will take place throughout the process. Continued public participation will
build on the sound work of previous studies- most of which have addressed the use
of public funds. Public participation in the form of the community wide visioning
process of VISTA 2000 and the specific parks and recreation facility
recommendations of the Infrastructure Committee and earlier efforts of the Parks
and Recreation Commission provide the foundation for the "City Center" planning.
This process will broaden the base of community use, ownership and acceptance.
. Quality in Materials and Services
Roseville already has developed a history of high quality expectations as evidenced
by design standards, PMP and PIP improvement criteria and service delivery
requirements for all city functions. In City Center, the best materials, newest
technologies, latest designs and high efficiency service formulas must be
incorporated into all planning strategies.
. Collaboration
The very definition of the word collaboration means the coming together of
individual interests committed to a singular common goal with the willingness of
6
all participating entities to provide resources, shared decision making and resultant
benefits. "City Center", instead of relying solely on public dollars, will combine
cost efficient government investment with commercial partnerships and a growing
citizen volunteer effort that has been an ongoing Roseville signature characteristic.
. Leveraging
Four years ago, the City Council established development policies which they
recently reaffIrmed which recognizes that a total reliance on public dollar
investment cannot support the future extensive redevelopment necessary for a city
such as Roseville. The adopted policy requires the leveraging of private and non-
city tax dollars for citizen tax dollars spent. The acquisition and preservation of the
significant natural resources of the St. Paul Waterworks property through the use
of communication tower revenues is an example of creative leveraging. "City
Center" will require similarly creative leveraging.
. Creativity, Compatibility and Flexibility of Usage
Traffic patterns, linkages, commercial endeavors, green space, spatial
relationships, architecture, parking, pedestrian circulation, etc., all will require the
best creative thinking of neighbors, citizens, users, planners and professional
consultants to insure the highest quality, most livable and cost effective spaces
possible. The commitment to explore creative alternatives is not intended to commit
the City Council to a particular outcome. Rather, it is the City Council direction
to explore and evaluate the merits and opportunity costs of all reasonable
alternatives to the "City Center" site.
. Establishing Critical Mass
Addressing community needs, to the broadest range feasible is the basic tenet and
the programmatic theme of "City Center". Interests of all ages, types and economic
strata will be incorporated into a broad based systems of places and activities. This
critical mass will at the same time allow for speciality programs to operate using
a more focused financial support base than relying on general public support.
Speciality retail shops, small offIces and world class sports intermingled with
public gathering spaces, social hall, exercise parlors and residences all on a close
proximity and accessible area.
. Efficient, Productive and Environmentally Sensitive Land Use
Recent Metropolitan Council reports have stressed that the effIcient and productive
use of urban land is as important as the under utilization of large tracts with very
low density. The critical element is the development of uses that have an
underlying, inter-related support base that is sensitive to the bounds of nature.
Realizing that many uses can coexist in limited space and in fact thrive is the
nucleus of the vision. The developmental stages must be consistent with the City's
comprehensive plan and not impact a delicate ecological system. Neighborhoods
must not only be protected from traffic, sound, light and views but must also be
enriched by their proximity to this community hub. Current uses such as city hall,
public works and the central fire station must be critically evaluated and improved
based on longer range, comprehensive planning.
7
. Neighborhood Building
As stated earlier, neighborhoods near and far from "City Center" will continue to
be the molecular base of livable Roseville. This vision is not one of taking away
from this base but rather enhancing it by creating community value and by a large
scale demonstration from which localities throughout the city can learn. As is
proposed in "City Center", churches, schools, store fronts and day care centers can
all be used as neighborhood focal points while still coming together for more
needed central services and products.
TIME LINE
The "City Center" process involves both short and long term efforts. It is important to move
expeditiously to an overall vision for the civic center and its contiguous areas. Steps should be
taken to develop plans for the creation of critical mass attached to the existing Skating Center. At
the same time, plans should be reconstituted for the redevelopment of the Arona site for residential
living. Simultaneously, comprehensive planning should start for the infrastructure and land
massing needed for a completed center of the community. Integration of private commerce,
residential and recreational related facilities with existing structures should be explored.
Rethinking of some existing structures and where and how they can best be suited should be
included.
Specifically, the following time line is proposed:
. Preliminary Master Plan
This will be the outline for various study options and sequences. Areas of study
and suggested processes will be identified.
. Phase I A (Activity Center integration onto complex)
Plans and specifications for moving functions from the current Roseville Activity
Center will be completed for Council review based on numerous planning sessions
with residents, user groups, community groups, commissions and committees.
Following approval, the plans will be bid for construction.
. Phase I B (Housing Plan for Arona site)
Using a concurrent process, plans will be reviewed by the Council and a developer
selected for redeveloping of the Arona site.
. Final preliminary draft of "City Center"Master Plan
This version of the Master Plan will show the ultimate scope and sequence of the
possibilities identified for the "four corners" of the "City Center" concept. Issues,
potential partnerships, land use projections and further processes for moving
forward will all be detailed in this plan.f
8
. Construction of Phase I & II
(I) Anticipated construction of community space at the civic center including
upgrades to the Skating Center per the contract with the State of Minnesota and
replacement of the activity center space and the (II) construction of a housing
project on the Arona site will begin.
. Establishment of nature and completion of Phases III, IV, V, etc.
This will be the completed vision for the future of the "City Center" concept.
Detailed land use plans and typical section drawings and renderings future land and
building features will be shown. As in other plans such as Twin Lakes, Gateway
etc., a narrative guide for future courses of action will be stated.
INITIAL STEPS
There are two steps necessary to successfully initiate the "City Center" process:
1. Authorize staff to assemble a design team. This professional team will be
responsible for being, along with city staff, commissions, committees and the
Council, the catalysts for citizen participation, partnership opportunity leads and
design options. They will guide the development of the "City Center" master plan.
2. Authorize staff to re-institute the planning process for the redevelopment of the
Arona (Activity Center) site. This part of the project will address not only the
needs for housing and the refurbishing and revitalization of the Arona
neighborhood creating increased value in this portion of the city, it will also serve
as a financial resource for future phases of "City Center".
In October, the Task Force discussed "What does Roseville City Center mean to you?".
Craig Klausing stated that getting people together was important as he grew up, such as
the corner store. It should be a place where children and adults are attracted to a mix of
activities. It creates a place where people want to go - "a place to go to".
Dick Bates said he enjoyed living above a town and people watching and walking in the
community; proximity to uses is important.
/
Lois Sinn Lindquist said she thinks not of a "city" but of town, village, green spaces,
public art, public/private investments, living environment; an area proud to visit
(visibility); the right kind of walking environment with a sense of cleanliness, charm and
safeness; a place of people comfort.
Jan Vanderwall said city center is year-round; it is not a traffic impedance; community
needs to get to it and through it.
Perri Hettler said she wants to focus on those things that should be preserved (Central
Park); no six story buildings; no large hotels; build on to City Hall; year-round theatre,
9
small scale unique retail (50th and France).
Ann Hermes said city center should be a tool to keep all of our homes appreciating in
value. Buildings need to be upgraded (small retail, two stories, umbrellas, water
fountains). Think what will be here in the long-range future (2010?).
Don Anderson said the infrastructure Committee recommended creating city identitv
through the park and parkway systems. The Oval can be "built on". There is need for
affordable senior housing. Gilman Village has created small shop concepts; a mix of uses.
Tom Johnson said accessibility is important. Congregating on this area along C and
Lexington is important. Accessibility along both is a key. How can we get from city hall
to the park.
Peggy Egli said Central Park should be a year-round promenade. Indoor spaces like the
Como Conservatory would be nice. The Activity Center should be moved to Lexington
and C. A convenience center would be nice; affordable and assisted senior housing;
extend the study to Lexington @ Highway 36 and create identity; create parkways and
boulevards.
Scott Bergs said a City Center has a sense of pride and identity. Build on positives now
available; a location between Minneapolis and St. Paul. Create a gathering place. Take
advantage of streets and 8 to 5 residents.
In November the Task Force Chair Keith Wietecki reviewed past activities and the November
7th City Tour. He asked that the Task Force consider a definition of "community center". We do
not want pre-dominant retail or large corporate office (Landmarks) for Roseville City Center.
The uses must be complementary to the site and center and housing could be included in the
vision of the center.
The difference between "community center" (building) vs. "city center" (place) was discussed. It
is an area or place in the community, not a building. The charge is to pull Roseville together -
put components together that people of the community agree should be placed together. An
"activity center" is a group of activities at a location. A community center is not the geographic
center of the community.
Kim Way asked for likes and dislikes ofthe November 7th community center tour.
a. Brooklyn Park. All civic campus (a site); nationals guard armory, no sidewalks,
pedestrian pathways, add-on buildings, busy, little planning, a number of
activities, senior center, recreation center, activity rooms, skate center, not
aesthetically pleasing - dark, long hallways, library, city maintenance garage. No
sense of entry or door; federal, state, county, city, school district, tank display out
front; shooting center.
b. Maple Grove. Hard to tell ifthis was going to work today, but will take 20 years
10
to complete; former gravel pit site that was being redeveloped by developer. City
takes "back seat" to master plan; created partnerships with builders/retailers.
Partnership could be used in Roseville, just differently; nice meeting spaces, good
indoor/outdoor connection to lake; teen and senior center heavily used with a
theatre; nice walk-through pattern; lots of good space; revenue from parties;
feeling of spaciousness; scattered group seating; space was gracious and sunny.
c. Plymouth. Where was city hall? Was the community building the city center;
parking problems; senior building not on site and not well planned; city, school
Life- Time partnership; no small child admittance; need to take advantage of
shared parking; be careful of public/private partnerships - get even treatment;
seniors wanted separated site from activity, retail (Cub), movie theatre, fast food
in area; located near major thoroughfares; private development activity wants
traffic and visibility.
d. Minnetonka. Civic center only; seniors and city hall together; hockey and
"Marsh" fitness site; no walking access to neighborhood; isolated; water and
decking were beautiful; dog training facility; site isolation.
e. Chaska. Has traditional city center and a community center adjacent to schools -
not near downtown; must drive to the facility; no community around it;
continuous add-on facility. Poor parking; On a mid-Saturday it was hardly used.
Theatre-auditorium art display center. Trying to build adjacent to neighborhood.
f. Chaska Downtown. Small town Minnesota with town square; could be placed in
a Roseville park or city center; decorative amenities; Highway 212 cuts through
site; nice main street.
g. Prior Lake-Dakota Fitness Center. Owned and operated by Native American
community; City of Prior Lake has access to it; was it a city center for Native
American community or meeting space? Discovery Zone was private operating
firm for child care drop-ins; emphasis on buildings; isolated from everything;
shooting range along with recreation center.
h. Edinborough. Too dense, too high, least used facility; the city center was too
dense like big glitz hotel with lobby; not easily connected but two separate
projects; playground and skating amenities are used by small kids, mothers,
seniors; summer use was less - mostly a winter activity center; closed off to rest
of Edina community - will not unify the community; should be next to Southdale;
liked tennis and golf greens. Centennial Lakes in summer - active; in winter as
skating rink; retail is adjacent to residential; built for users of area; very unnatural;
lots of concrete, engineered spaces.
1. 50th and France. Lighting great; active! Two city personalities; street level retail
and housing above; need multiple stories to be financially feasible; need
public/private partnership; traffic congestion!
11
J. North St. Paul. No parking; across from public works; no community entrance.
k. New Brighton. Good example of community center with play area always busy;
an accommodation and connection of many uses; partnership with Mounds View
School District; replaced commercial with residential.
1. Maplewood and Shoreview. Lots of civic uses but not connected; typically
suburban; stand-alone buildings.
m. General observations:
find compatible uses to share parking
need to join together the uses; housing and retail with parking at rear;
many centers were not yet part of community
all buildings were not awe-inspiring; in Roseville we use "campus-like"
developments; Center Pointe in Roseville is a good example; is there a
community sense of architectural identity? Would buildings in Roseville
be add-ons?
City Center VisionlIdeas from the November meeting included:
Meeting rooms; updated fire/police facility; outdoor facilities; amphitheater swimming
pool indoor; street level mixed use area; updated government complex - state, city,
county; indoor play area; mixed housing; design that blurs distinction between indoor and
outdoor; specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; teen center; service center; multi-
purpose rooms; child care facilities; volunteer organization spaces; performance theatre;
seminar theater; pathways between the facilities; land mark for the center; good path
access to community, human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes;
art/history center; fitness area; racquetball courts; a safe place to be; home/garden
education facility; continuing community center, indoor tennis, carefully planned parking
facilities; major transit facility, possibly LRT, HR; food service/restaurants; conference
facility; kiosk/and select cart vendors; solarium; storage space for center organizations;
statutes and outdoor art; park and recreation center offices; climbing wall, intergeneration
activities/connections; aesthetic continuity in Central Park; good and decorative
ornamental lighting; religious facility; outdoor track; design continuity; government
center schools, CTV, city, cable system; an architectural design that breaks from
precedent; passive village square; beauty and barber shops; public access studio; satellite
postal service; design for flexible open ended growth; gallery area; neighborhood
promotion; massage center; community nurse/health services; kitchen/wedding reception
area; technology center - internet access library; child play area; craft castle or room;
signage activities (informational and directional); putting greens; good street accesses;
parkway-tree lined streets with walkways; basketball/volleyball; service-retail; County
Road C as a street; streetscape; monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens.
12
CATEGORIES OF VISION/IDEAS:
1. Uses; indoor/outdoor
2. Infrastructure
3. Tone, character, sense of place, ambiance
4. Type of users
5. Active/passive
6. Design flexibility for expansion
7. Seasonal
8. Public/private
9. Operational/maintenance costs
In January, Steve Sarkozy, City Manager, provided a summary of which uses have been
compiled by the administrative staff. He suggested:
1. Transit Village
2. Mini-Conference Center
3. Cable/TV technology center
4. County service center
5. Housing
6. Private recreation area
7. Charter schools
8. Indoor playground
9. Home office service center
10. Day care facility
11. Indoor park
12. Neighborhood retail
13. Community library
14. Co-generation of energy
Details regarding" private recreation" uses have been discussed. How immediate are
these uses - when? The private sector is limited by available land. It is not clear yet
whether this is a "best fit" for the City.
Transit - what things may happen in next five to ten years. LRT, commuter trains, bike
pathways, a bus lane are all possible, some on the same site.
Parking on the site is important. What are the possibilities for ramping. With more uses,
a parking structure would be necessary. Steve Sarkozy said the Task Force must tell the
City" What feels right" and are we ready for this new type of development.
Kim Way reviewed the vision statement and suggested "testing" what can fit on the site,
after confirming all the uses that should be incorporated as a portion of the City Center.
The February Task Force meeting was an opportunity for the members to think big and
futuristic. The City Center Planner, Kim Way asked the members to consider three functional use
13
options for the future: a government center, a recreation center, and community center.
These types of uses could be combined in a number of layouts at the City center site. The
Task Force reviewed the Main Street option, the Parkway Option, and the City Commons
Option. Each have distinct advantages and features.
More discussion occurred with the Roseville Schools and Supt. John Thien - what kind of
synergy could there be with the schools. The two school pools have been talked about and that
the Owasso School could add to the future of the City-School cooperative projects.
Schools will have more extended day and evening opportunities. Schools will have the
young care centers and senior centers throughout the day. These spaces can be used for
meetings at other times.
Indoor pool and play areas will be used evenings and weekends, but could be matched
with education activities, parking, and other space. There is tremendous demand for gym
space.
Kim Way asked for school plans (both districts) illustrating an inventory of spaces and
uses now occupying the space. The four uses proposed on the City Center site are
government center, recreation center, community center, and housing.
In the government center, an updated government building complex was needed (police
size; public works relocation; licensing; add park and recreation; keep everything now
here, here; public safety building).
In the future the library could be combined with a Technology Center. Post office and
licensing may be a possibility, even combined with a private service center. Where
should the technology hub be located in Roseville? Leave the City Center design open for
these options. Within the Community Center" gathering-learning spaces" , the Task
Force higWighted uses such as:
. Multi-purpose rooms and teen center
. Conference rooms
. Seminar and performance theatre
. Public access/cable studios
. Child and senior care facilities
. Art display center and outdoor display
. Community health clinic center and services (related but not in a government center)
. a lower priority because of space
. perhaps put health service center at Fire Stations
. Technology center and conference center + studio + hub
. History archives and center or "Hallway of Memories"
. Hands-on arts activities within community center
. Year-round solarium indoor/outdoor space, especially as a design element of
architecture which integrates indoor and outdoor uses and connects them
14
Within the recreation center:
. Recreation swimming facilities (lan Van der Wall will provide pool conditions or
schedules)
. Indoor children's play area (eagle's nest or discovery zone)
. Child care facilities for recreation users
. Fitness center (private facility possibility)
. Racquetball courts (private facility possibility)
. Indoor Tennis (private facility possibility)
. Basketball/volley ball (private facility possibility)
. Climbing wall (private facility possibility)
. Indoor track (private facility possibility)
. Massage center (private facility possibility)
. Putting green (private facility possibility)
. Oval - public
. Ice arena - public
What keeps a government /community center vibrant? Who are the users we want in this center?
Should the concept follow? Integrate three concepts into one place, be blendable, fluid. The project
must have" connectivity" .
The fire and public works facilities may be more industrial in nature, may not fit in accounting
center.
Are there" special needs" facilities that could be included?
Parking should be considered an integral part of each concept.
Residential characteristics of the center may include:
. do transit and residential uses work together?
. could a transit site go on mobile home site?
. does transit site include more density surrounding it?
. encourage housing within Comprehensive Plan (guide it)
. how could the city connect uses across transit lines?
. does there need to be a better government center connection to Central Park?
. design an interconnected campus site.
All three concepts included the three primary uses but had different emphasis. For example, the
Parkway concept has wide green spaces and pedestrian activity along Lexington Parkway and
County Road C. Approximately 1000 parking spaces, in a ramp, would be needed to serve the
expanded government and recreation centers. The new uses are oriented to the parkways; the
parking spaces are behind the new uses. From the northwest corner of Lexington and County
Road C a winter garden faces Central Park. The recreation center extends from the current
skating center south to County Road. The government center remains at the corner of
Lexington and C.
15
The Main Street concept is oriented to a new north south road which connects County Road C
and Woodhilll in a straight north south fashion, just east ofthe skating center. This main street
would allow for "drop offs' at many different entry points to the skating and recreation center,
the community center and the government center. A pool would be placed south of the skating
center. The government center would remain on the corner of Lexington and County Road C,
while the community center would face Woodhill. A winter garden would be constructed directly
east, across the main street from the skating center. Parking will be east of the garden. A public
safety (police and fire) building would be located at Woodhill and Lexington. The main street
becomes the open space entrance to the winter garden.
The City Square/Commons Concept creates an internal focus of central open space with all
uses fronting on the square. Recreation and a pool are adjacent to the skating center. The
government center faces county Road C; the public safety building faces Lexington; the
community center is located at the corner of Lexington and W oodhill. Service parking would be
attached to the skating center. The main parking would be located under the city square.
In March the Task Force reviewed City Cent er Concepts:
Kim Way described the three City Center Concepts (Parkway Concept; Main Street Uses; and a
City Square Concept) with four major uses. The charge to the Task Force was discussed; what
are the steps (development strategies) necessary to implement the plan. The end product must
have a strategy based on economic reality.
Kim Way described the program, noting that the design and scale or size will be a future step. He
challenged the Task Force to define the "City Center area or district". Details are needed on the
"Program" which is to fit into the areas, the "boxes" that hold the uses; size of the boxes; and the
location on the site. The City Center must take into account the opportunity (and value created) at
the edges of the City Center.
The Task Force eventually must prioritize the proposed uses; i.e., pools vs police facilities. In
addition the Task Force must answer where does public works facility go and whether the City
needs a new public safety facility? By defining the uses and the market, the consultants will be
able to create a spatial relationship for the required parking
The Task Force agreed the visioning process has been completed, but a reality check must allow
the Task Force to deal with immediate concerns.
The Task Force, as a consensus, evaluated the three concepts and found that the City Square
concept best fit their value statements in part because the" Square" gives a heart, focus, or center
to the community; a sense of place. The City Square concept works best because it does not rely
on the street system and calm traffic on both County Road C and Lexington. The City Square
should be an "intense" design with a critical mass and activity on the site, while not
overwhelming the site. The Task Force preferred more density as in the City Square. Yet, there is
a lack of central parking accessible to all. City Hall could be moved if it allowed the Community
Center activities to thrive. Moving the pool away from the skating center may help each
functions better. A Main Street concept could be built into the City Square concept but a
16
sprawling City Center parking lot was not favored.
Parking along the north edge (W oodhill side) across from the shopping center appears feasible,
with smaller service parking adjacent to uses. Approximately 1,000 parking spaces are needed to
support all uses. Transit stops along the railroad may require more parking. The height of
parking structures is a major concern. There is a concern with fire access near the parking ramp
turning movements.
The Winter Garden should link diagonally across Lexington, from City Square and Central Park..
Performances at Central Park may be enhanced by expanded program space within City Square.
An arts and craft area within the Winter Park may work well. These sites should be "intimate" ,
providing enhanced dynamics among participants.
The Task Force asked if there should be a priority; what happened first (implementation strategy).
Dennis Welsch described the community planning and hearing process that would be used to gain
Planning Commission and public input (and eventually seek project approval. From the City
Council).
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION (March, 1999):
The Task Force consensus refined the City Center District boundaries. Staff was directed to
prepare a map and language for the Comprehensive Plan" District" amendment.
The entry to City Center along Lexington and" C" should be reconstruction into a parkway as
has been previously approved in the Pathway Plan and the Comprehensive Plan.
George Reiling, Sf. described his view of the development history in Roseville.
NEXT STEPS
Kim Way noted that Phase I of the Task is near completion. On the Task Force charge, the
monthly meetings process for this program was to take six to nine months.
The schedule includes a Planning Commission process. After the City reviews the Task Force
report and analyzes the impacts, the Task Force would then respond to the input from the City.
The Task Force found that the approach/process is currently an "undone" idea. and encouraged
further review at the Task Force level prior to proposing a recommendation to the Planning
Commission. Then, the Task Force should be very clear about the direction sent. The Task Force
should continue to work, gain input and should hear from others..
Kim was directed to continue the refinement of the City Square Concept.
17
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEMBERS:
KEITH WIETECKI, CHAIR
2428 FARRINGTON CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
LOIS SINN LINDQUIST, VICE-CHAIR
2706 WESTWOOD
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
PATRICIA JOHNSON
2986 MILDRED DR.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
PEGGY EGLI
705 HEINEL CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
DONALD ANDERSON
948 W. CO. RD. D
ROSEVILLE, MN 55126
RICHARD A. BATES
2616 NO. FAIRVIEW AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
PERRIE N. HEITLER
459 W. CO. RD C
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
THOMAS JOHNSON
1678 LYDIA AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
JOSEPH SMITH
895 TRANSIT AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
SCOTT 1. BERGS
534-2 LOVELL AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
ANN M. HERMES
2796 GAL TIER ST.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
18
CRAIG KLAUSING
447 ROSE PLACE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
JAN V ANDERW ALL
395 W. CO. RD. C
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Q:\CITYCENT\City Center Task Force Summary(040599).doc
19
Q)
...
d
Qj
~
...
d
D
Qj
,J:
.....
....
o
'"
Qj
'"
d
,J:
0..
Qj
,J:
E-<
s::
.g s
~ ~:~
e ;g 'u >
~ o'f ~
Qj Q) d s::
"'Co..Qj
.( .- U U
~1~ ~
~~~U
(;,:C'U'::O
'"-"------
1""""'1 ""'" 1""""'I.....t
Q) Q) Qj Q)
tIJ (f.) tfJ tI)
d d d .,
,J:,J:,J:..<::
0..0..0..0..
cu
~ fIJ
~~
"':'::2
III
~a-.
1-:tI=
a..
cu
1:
cu
'-J
o
'"
Q)
.;
d
s::
<:
.....
C
Q)
E
0..
o
OJ
>
OJ
o
N
Qj
'"
.,
,J:
p..
<IJ
~
';J
.,
c::
...
...
.....
:;z
c::
(\:I
'S:
...
...
.....
'"
d
~
0..
o
~
Q./
o
M
Q./
'"
.,
c:
;
C
o
';J
d
"a
E
...
o
""
s::
(\:I
'S:
...
Qj
.....
'"
(\:I
::E
"'"
Q./
'"
d
,J:
p..
s::
o
:e
....
C
Qj
E
;:S
u
o
0,
.;
c:
.9
..... bJ)
~ .5
c: ~
8 'x
~Q)
,S]
~~
~ ~
s:: '0;
o bJ)
C 01
.~ 13
..........
(\:I <IJ
..... ...
c:.....
E 5
8-5
O~
"1:1 ~
Q./t;:::
73"1:1
Q./ OJ
~'\;;
p.~
Q),U
o..~
B c
!::: .S:!
~ .~
" 01
Q).....
~ 0:
",,J:
(\:I.....
J2"1:1
u~
~ ~ ~
'-"1:1 -
;s: 0: .S:!
J-4~'-::;
'OJ 1:::"1:1
..c: (\:I c::
ut'iJ8
U')
Q)
'"
<<S
..c:
p..
.S
E
ci.
II')
M
I.i:5
.....
<<S
...
Q)
"
...
o
o
.....
~
c
',p
Q)
Qj
E
Q./
..c:
.....
"0
'"
=a
U
J2
~ca
~:c
~.~
..c:U
..... .....
'w 0
~ ~
... Q./
]"5
u~
;.;u
"'-
"E 'u
o 5
o 0
....u
0;]
u.....
@
~
d'~
~ ..;
c: Q,>
.g:E
:'X
~ .~
. t::
.~~
;:S .
C"..c:
"'0"::
.S E
...<tI)
c::..c:
c: 0..
ti5 ~
'" 0
'6~
...<=
... 0:
'ra ~
..c: Q./
U"1:I
Q) c::
.;! ~
> c:
:i~
~ ur
.2: ~
;s:~
..c:~
.~ 0
w U
~tI)
.~ ci
01 0
o ~
"0
-g c:
...<
~ g ~
~o~
N
"1:1
...
o
u
~ ~ ~
: .8 '0
~... Q./
c:: ..c ..c:
;a~~
:;::: ;:S 0
]]g
s:: '" ',t1
,9 ~:a
~t;g
QJ~(j
~~~
~ c c:
"CJ ... ,9
c: ..c: .....
0: E-< u
~ . c::
~~t.E
~.9 ]
~:~ td
0"1:1 '"
~ g g
o U '..-I
',p b/).~
:a .S ]
g e 8
u OJ .
~ go ~
~ (/).9
13.~ '\;;
....." ...
o 0 gs"
c.... 0
:s Ci cJ
QJ ~ .-
~ ~ E
._ ., 0 .,;
;s:g.s~
.=: ~ ~;e
] ttS Q) =
u .S .s .E
~
e.
;:S
::E
..0
o
eA
o
E
...
QJ
~
p..
Q./
-'<
~
tb
tI)
..a
U
'"
~
'"
'2
5]
o ~
>.::E
~-e
0:
SeA
Q1:j
!ti C
ZJ g
tlJU
t'
'0
Q)
,J:
....
....
o
..c:
U
<<S
...
...-0
~~
.... c:
'" Q)
E E
,.E 13
bJ)0
.5 ~
"0..0
S ~
~~
,,::9
~ g
]~
ZJ '"
'" Q)
t'd :E
,,:-=
v u
~tS
~o
bJ)0
::s..c:
'" U
:!2 '"
~~
....E-<
Q)
~ .~
... ....
'(;J ;.=
..c: '0
uJS
-0
c
;:S
o
i
u
.,
..0
...
.s
"1:1
Q)
'"
;:S
Q)
..0
"CJ
"a
o
U
'"
Q)
.....
o
c:
~
,5
.....
Q)
Q)
E
Q)
..c:
.....
~
"1:1
OJ
~
'"
.,
c:
o
'"
c
.r:::
o
-,
.....
c::
~
"1:1
c:
::S
o
i
U
0:
..0
....
o
t-
o:
E
E
;:S
'"
0:
...
'"
,J:
..... .
Q) '"
~...
B~
~Q)
-8 -:5
..0....
::9 ~
g ~
u.E
~'a.
.....
",..c:
~ .~
] .~
'" Q)
0: c
=:.0
~ g
Q) U
]]
0: <tI
> <tI
a ~
-,"1:1
~ ci
... - 0::= ,9
.g a ..... .<:: 'd
Q)_Q)~\V
U p.. ~:!2 .::
o.....c:u"1:l
~.:: ~ .& tu
~"'JjQ)..c:
c: 5 ., .- t:
'2 ~ ~ ;s: .E
]o..~:E!5
0.. E ..... ,tJ,i '::
0)0-....-
-5 u u3 .=: ~
Q) '" 0:::=
B oB 2j D '~
"0 0
c::Bo..~:t
o,5uQ)
IE' c ;.= 'S: '" .
~ Q)..o Q)-O'\
E ::S ........
B"1:I ~~ '2
"1:1 5..c:..c 0..
~ E..... [<
c<<S&Q)>,
Q./ ..... ;:S..c: <<S
-5s;g.....",o
] ~ r~~
.t:: is E 8 c
~~~-5o
~~~13~
:!2o...Q)c
u ..... ~ g ::s
qJ'o..(tI..O
~ ... :: o..U
.- ~ t'\5 0 ~
;s:&...~u
-5~.D-5Q)
'Qj ~ ~ c :S
~E--<EoEQ)
.:: 0) OJ ~
~-5~~"&
u~-:St8:j
....;
c::
II)
'"
'"
6..
bJ)
c::
'OJ
.D
'(;1
(j
...
....
'"
~
.t:
....
'OJ
~
..
'@
.t:
U
..c:
'~
--d
!1:
8
0..
c..
<:
0;
...
....
o
c::
bD
,5
~
'"
S
..c:
~
::s
::E
M
.,f
.....
c
...
E
;:S
u
o
"0
"'0
;a
Q)
Q)
tJ
'8
E
o
u
'"
.9
.....
'"
'"
...
<.J
...
~
"1:I-c
c:o-.
.,0'1
~";'
t;LO
p..~
"'......
-5 .S
... '"
~ Q)
..t:::::;
,j,.,J.:.=
13 '0
.....JS
g ~
8 ~
'" ...
~~
]11
< Q)
c: t::
o Q)
ooB
OJ
-5 ...
E -5
o 0
<l:: ~.::
=s .5 ';'
0.. bJ) c:: ~
.5 .5 ~"1:1
~ ~ ~ ~
'S: 0: ... 0
c: 'S: -5 E
..... Q) 0 '"0
~-E~~
...B5::9
~11~g
o>..ou
"" 0 '"
~e~g.
0:"''''00
~~31ob
..c:'- 0 .....
oIJ of.D ifJ
1:"1:1"'~
'0 "3 -5 =
0.. 0 "1:1 .-
",u"a~ oJ
g28~'~
:; ~ ", ~ ]
<<I ""0 ~._ ~
'\;;.~ ,5 ~ S
-:5 10-1 ~ Q"'O
"O"1:IQ)~Q)
l1 ~ ~ QJ .~
g R..8 p.. ~
c:gc:c:;a
~ 6b'~ .~ ~
.a ~ .~ .~ ~
o ~ S S c
-'~EE'"
'\;; 1: 0 0 ~
~ ,_ U U ;:S
c
.9
.... QJ
U U
., ...
Q) '" 0
... ;:S ""
~g-,<
,g...~
~ .E-f
cu~QJ
~c..c:
C'::I'- .....,
>.~~
~~ ,~
~ co '6:0
]tj~
.8:~
'" >. .
~:-=E
;> ~ ~
~~c
g.~e
~ ~ 08
r=: '0
,- c"1:l
.~ u) --g
o c.. "0
't;; g ~
oB bb '"
~t)Wt:
~ ~ g.~
c:~o..i.)
~ .5 QJ ~
'S "1:1 -5 :a
.ga~'C1
c: '" '" c:
.- t:: >. 0
-1 gs <<S '.;::J
c: ,- E '"
.s'~ '" E
tI) <.J go ..a
,~ g 0 s::
.3<l::bb8
"" c
io..8 ~
~ R.t:: Q) C
@g;S:-5-;
'CD 10-1 . b.O'-
~ ~ ~.5 ~
rJ) ._ c: Q)
~~tj~~
..,.~Q)Eu",
"" c t:: U
.S .;;;~ 8 ~
"'-5~.zu
~oQ)bJ)Q)
'S: ~ a g-5
,5 g ~ ~ ]
15~-f..o~~
"'ZJo~j;f~
c..'S: ..... is OJ <<S
O::Sc:C:",o",
._ 0 :: ~ ._
Sb.r::: ..., 0 ~-5
.....~t::..coc
~ ;s; ~ (,) ~.-
.... ~ U ttI ""0 :;f:I
~ C i;'~ c: ~
,5 ~ 8 . ~'1:
"1:I15"1:111~...
~ 0 a 'S: .9 ~
~~5~.5~~
bJ)Q)oQ)l:....
;:S._N..oOC
,'" t: i;' 0 u ~
~Q)..,.~"Oc:
<.J ~ "'" ., c: 0
~ ~ ~:s : Ou
._._ c ::s Q.J ~
::> ... ';J 0 ,-
;>..oQ)~~E
..c: ., Q) .-...
,~"1:IE~~..8
W Q.I.... ::: ~....
~~><Q)"Oc..
.. Q) Q) E '" Q./
'8~:E:,;::g
..c: ::s..c: 0 E 0
u"'.....u;.=u
'"
~
..c: ::
... Q)
<Ii c::
0.. Q)
~c:: -5
.,,,,"1:1
Q./ '" c::
"1:1'- .,
~:E ~
~ E-< .~
.5 l1 ~
QJC::"1:I
~e]
"a~E-<
..8 e.'
'" 0.. ~
'" E 0:
0.. ,- is..
;:S.......
~-5 ~
...."0 '"
~ ~ ~
~ >-. t1J
.......<:: Q)
.5 0.. oB
....., ~ ~ a:i
~ ~~.-g
~ QJ o.
"1:1 ~'Ei]
~~ ~~
Q"I~'-..D
~g ,5'5
;1-0 gb~
C~O"O
o "" .... c..
~ t; ~OJ
<11 ..8 'S ..c:
"'Cw====
~ ~ 1: '~
C e 8......
ooo..~
0.....0.....
oJ
bJ)
..
'"
.r:::
U ....
- .,
Ci]..c: Qj
c: ..... ::S
'60"1:1 c:
'i: ~ '':;
o ... C
OJ ~ 8
'51:"'0
'OfE:;
t..a]
[.2. ~
f/)~=
~p..-g
'" ", 0..
'" E ...
~;:s-5
2~-E
~ e .~
'" 0 '"
~8~
~]'~
> ..... ...
~'C1E
,J:"'"O
~ g a
01"'.....
-5 '" a
"1:I~t:
~~ &
C ~ E
= 0'-
., "1:1 .:2
~t>DE
~.s ::S
C g; 1:
>0: 0 v
..... E
C '" 0
~~E
'"
a
N
(IJ
C>
ro
Cl.
'"
a
Q)
C>
<tI
Cl.
~ ~f1\ CJ\
v:.. "
'-'
o
'"
'"
-:::
~
'E
I::
~
b.I)
I::
:0
'S:
o
..
c..
E
i2
..r:
.~
I::
o
'Z
'"
.u
I::
'"
'"
'"
..
c..
'"
-a
'"
.....
'"
<11
tIP
t:>D.;
:J .....
'" p..
to ~
~ 5
OJ u
-a ---
I:: '"
'" OJ
>B
I:: u
~.~
-.;
..
'"
I::
<11
to!)
<:
..3
U
';:
.u
"'--0
6 ~
.. '"
~ G
~ .~
u-a
c~
o ~
d:~
",.J:>
~ ~
<11 <11
:5~
-a <11
<1I.c
.~ E-<
~-ci
-a ~
I:: '"
'" c
-a '"
<11 <11
~ ~
'S: "2
<11 U
.. 0
~ ~
.. "-
o 0
\.Lo I::
'.-OG 0
'" .-
'" '"
E-< ;g
<11 U
...c .~
E-<ov
If"i
'"
'-'
.;:
'"
~
S!
ovE=
c '"
'" v >
~ ~~~
.... g ~ t:
3: to!).u
"'C~~
~~ C ~
:J: aJ;:
2",~ -5 ,~
ct1 b r:: c;
.. fJ} ':; \-0
~u:o ~ ~
'5 -~ E__
.:!i '" E bD
.,,0.0"
~ ~ u ~
o o.-a .....
5.8~b
'Z It: ~ J5
c..Cl:SQ)'-"
0-;; 'S: '"
"'O~QJ~
tU Q) ~ QJ
]~C;c
ctt~~~
~g'~~
'S: .....J:> ..
OJ8E~
).... ... (!) "-J
OJ 0 E 0
-5~~"'g.;
o (/) ..... d 8
;; ~ J: ,= ~
~OJ.-OG~~
u.c~Uif:
g~E-<8:O
~ ~ .8'- a1
g.~,,;:::>-~
o G -a .~ 5b
~ '" I:: ... I::
E-<:O~O!:!
:0
o
~
-,;
u
:.c
0.
'"
..
I:JJ
o
OJ
tof)
OJ
..r:
.u
-a
OJ
S
c
OJ
::2
OJ
u
..
o
\.Lo
.-OG
'"
'"
E-<
OJ
..r:
.u
tiC
I::
'Z
OJ
OJ
E
.c..3
u u
.. ....
'" ..
~ .~
OJ-a
..r: OJ
.u.c
.u .u
~'O
.u
~ <lJ ~ c
E -5 -g .~
Q) u) 0.. E
E tI.I "'0 :-
.~ ~ <3 ~
.5 2..r: c
0.= $
-g ~'~ OJ
:0 ,_ _ C
o c: 'u {/)
10-0 c: c: C"J
J;P '" ... OJ
u"D..oJS
d cIJ U ~
~:.cc~
:E~OE
~-:~ ~
'" <IJ .u
..<: c.. ov '0;
:gg~E
g 6h '" ~
.c ~ gf=
~ ~'J: .~
~ ~ ~ tI)
ol::.cg]
~ '~:9 u
.-OG..<:o2
~~.c;:;
t-<S'21::
OJ I:: ;:; '2
-5 0 I:: I::
00'~ .2 ~
'E c .~ ~ ~
OJ '" 6.c ~
~~6E-<,-;::
- ~ 0 ca
X ;u ~ ~
~ [) ~.~ ~
.,..,~...t: '2 tfj E
_ ~ a:: B c
:;: gn.2 ,~ ~
.......uc..-a.J:>
'"
0-
S .S
tc~
v.; -
f:: .g
S u
I:: ~
.~ :.s
..r: '"
......"
'S:
'~ 2
c..
4~
~ ;;
I::c
I:: OJ
o E
[3 E
'.g 8
~ 0 <<i
c.6-.1 'C
~] .~
.. ..... ....
c..~U
'" ;:! I::
OJ g'.!:P
"'0 .. '"
-=(f.)~
~~-;
I:: ....
- OJ OJ
~;al::
bDg~
.5 ~ C
~"'t:J ~
OJ '" OJ
E 8 ~
.u.J:>_
~~~
I:: .u >.
OJ "'0 '"
~~$
...
,-
o
J::
cr\
~ ::>
C\ .u
......"'0
o~
:'J'S:
>'1::
co ._
~~
>,_ c
.; ~ ,g
E {/) g.
1 ~'u
E-< ~ .~
c:: 'ti) ~
o~o..
><---'"
OJ I:: g
= ~ ~
~ :-2 :e
OJ u g
E -a ....
-@S
.~ '" ~
OJ g. 0
~ 0 0
o 6h ~
\.Lo ....
~~~
~21~
OJ I:: 0.
.c_o
E-< .~
bbE;,5
I:: p.. CI)
.~ ~..s
'<:J a> C
~ 0 '"
.u E
';<oE
'" <") 0
Z..cu
'"
'0
M
QJ
0>
en
a.
u
-a
g:
.,.;
3,
t
b
z
'"
u
'"
o
"-
""
v.
~
~
'"
u
>-
E-
9:
CJ
-6
-- DRAFT--
City Center Task Force Report
Notes Summarized by Dennis Welsch
April 5, 1999
BACKGROUND (June.1998) by Bob Bierscheid
Over the past several years, the City of Roseville has invested much time and energy through
numerous attempts to define its future. City Council planning sessions, specialized committees,
consultant reports and the Recreation Infrastructure Committee have been extensions of
direction received in the VISTA 2000. One common thread of each of the processes has been
the recognition of the need for a core community area that is generally described as "City
Center." This vision is more than a community center, more than a modern city hall, more
than a supporting business district and more than a quality residential site. It is an integration
of all of these activities into a blended formula of play, service, commerce and habitation in a
commons so coordinated that all of these functions thrive and grow synergistically.
Although the key ingredient for the well being of the community will continue to be the
strength of neighborhoods, studies of healthy communities reveal a common thread in that they
all have a thriving community focus. Several other Twin Cities communities, such as
Shoreview, Maplewood and Chaska have developed higWy developed community centers.
These efforts have relied totally on public spending and government management to provide
services. A few cities including the St. Paul Town Square project, Edinborough in Edina and
the Lifetime Fitness Center in Plymouth have attempted integrating commerce and government
into a common delivery system. The general purpose of the proposed City Council action is to
initiate a process to explore Roseville's response to the "City Center" concept with the
understanding that planning, design and implementation of the community's vision will be
staged over time.
"City Center" is envisioned to be a:
-communal gathering place
-center for the coordination and delivery of essential services
-a locale for the development of mental and physical health
-major venue for state, national and international cultural, sport and business activities
-an entrepreneurial marketplace for services and goods
-residential living of varied styles
-source of community pride
-hub of Roseville community activity
,,c, ~ o..f^.
\..t\.:'l
The current Civic Center has provided some of these elements but has been limited
because of a lack of long range comprehensive planning and the essential critical mass
of activities and services. Using the four comers concept, this area has these significant
attributes:
1. The natural resources and beauty of Central Park
2. The surrounding developable space
3. The existing infrastructure including the unique features of the Skating Center
and
City Hall.
4. Healthy nearby residential neighborhoods
5. The most important of all elements, the central community location. The
founders of the community recognized the importance of centrality when they
chose this site as the civic center. During the developing years, the city has
capitalized on the location through the construction of key civic facilities and
the establishment of major vehicular and pedestrian thoroughfares that make
this area the most accessible in the city.
Through careful planning, these resources can be used to build a quality City Center
capable of making Roseville a strong, viable, livable community for many generations
to come.
,
CITY CENTER PRINCIPALS
In order to maximize the special opportunity available to our community, "City
Center"will be based on these guiding principals. The general objective is to develop a
community hospitality center that would involve all of the community, broaden the base
of participation and involve opportunities for public, private, and not-for profit
investment:
. Community Participation-Pathways to New Opportunities
The City Center process must not only allow, but rather demand
continued extensive participation by all segments of the community.
Community groups, neighborhoods, businesses, civic leaders, the
Chamber of Commerce and individual citizens all have a common stake
in the future core of our City. More, rather than less, citizen
involvement will characterize the success of the project. It is envisioned
that numerous, simultaneous but interconnected planning and discussion
efforts will take place throughout the process. Continued public
participation will build on the sound work of previous studies- most of
which have addressed the use of public funds. Public participation in the
form of the community wide visioning process of VISTA 2000 and the
specific parks and recreation facility recommendations of the
Infrastructure Committee and earlier efforts of the Parks and Recreation
Commission provide the foundation for the "City Center" planning. This
2
process will broaden the base of community use, ownership and
acceptance.
. Quality in Materials and Services
Roseville already has developed a history of high quality expectations as
evidenced by design standards, PMP and PIP improvement criteria and
service delivery requirements for all city functions. In City Center, the
best materials, newest technologies, latest designs and high efficiency
service formulas must be incorporated into all planning strategies.
. Collaboration
The very definition of the word collaboration means the coming together
of individual interests committed to a singular common goal with the
willingness of all participating entities to provide resources, shared
decision making and resultant benefits. "City Center", instead of relying
solely on public dollars, will combine cost efficient government
investment with commercial partnerships and a growing citizen volunteer
effort that has been an ongoing Roseville signature characteristic.
. Leveraging
Four years ago, the City Council established development policies which
they recently reaffirmed which recognizes that a total reliance on public
dollar investment cannot support the future extensive redevelopment
necessary for a city such as Roseville. The adopted policy requires the
leveraging of private and non-city tax dollars for citizen tax dollars
spent. The acquisition and preservation of the significant natural
resources of the St. Paul Waterworks property through the use of
communication tower revenues is an example of creative leveraging.
"City Center" will require similarly creative leveraging.
. Creativity, Compatibility and Flexibility of Usage
Traffic patterns, linkages, commercial endeavors, green space, spatial
relationships, architecture, parking, pedestrian circulation, etc., all will
require the best creative thinking of neighbors, citizens, users, planners
and professional consultants to insure the highest quality, most livable
and cost effective spaces possible. The commitment to explore creative
alternatives is not intended to commit the City Council to a particular
outcome. Rather, it is the City Council direction to explore and evaluate
the merits and opportunity costs of all reasonable alternatives to the
"City Center" site.
. Establishing Critical Mass
Addressing community needs, to the broadest range feasible is the basic
tenet and the programmatic theme of "City Center". Interests of all ages,
3
types and economic strata will be incorporated into a broad based
systems of places and activities. This critical mass will at the same time
allow for speciality programs to operate using a more focused financial
support base than relying on general public support. Speciality retail
shops, small offices and world class sports intenningled with public
gathering spaces, social hall, exercise parlors and residences all on a
close proximity and accessible area.
. Efficient, Productive and Environmentally Sensitive Land Use
Recent Metropolitan Council reports have stressed that the efficient and
productive use of urban land is as important as the under utilization of
large tracts with very low density. The critical element is the
development of uses that have an underlying, inter-related support base
that is sensitive to the bounds of nature. Realizing that many uses can
coexist in limited space and in fact thrive is the nucleus of the vision.
The developmental stages must be consistent with the City's
comprehensive plan and not impact a delicate ecological system.
Neighborhoods must not only be protected from traffic, sound, light and
views but must also be enriched by their proximity to this community
hub. Current uses such as city hall, public works and the central fire
station must be critically evaluated and improved based on longer range,
comprehensive planning.
. Neighborhood Building
As stated earlier, neighborhoods near and far from "City Center" will
continue to be the molecular base of livable Roseville. This vision is not
one of taking away from this base but rather enhancing it by creating
community value and by a large scale demonstration from which
localities throughout the city can learn. As is proposed in "City Center",
churches, schools, store fronts and day care centers can all be used as
neighborhood focal points while still coming together for more needed
central services and products.
TIME LINE
The "City Center" process involves both short and long tenn efforts. It is important to
move expeditiously to an overall vision for the civic center and its contiguous areas.
Steps should be taken to develop plans for the creation of critical mass attached to the
existing Skating Center. At the same time, plans should be reconstituted for the
redevelopment of the Arona site for residential living. Simultaneously, comprehensive
planning should start for the infrastructure and land massing needed for a completed
center of the community. Integration of private commerce, residential and recreational
related facilities with existing structures should be explored. Rethinking of some
existing structures and where and how they can best be suited should be included.
4
Specifically, the following time line is proposed:
. Preliminary Master Plan
This will be the outline for various study options and sequences. Areas
of study and suggested processes will be identified.
. Phase I A (Activity Center integration onto complex)
Plans and specifications for moving functions from the current Roseville
Activity Center will be completed for Council review based on numerous
planning sessions with residents, user groups, community groups,
commissions and committees. Following approval, the plans will be bid
for construction.
. Phase I B (Housing Plan for Arona site)
Using a concurrent process, plans will be reviewed by the Council and a
developer selected for redeveloping of the Arona site.
. Final preliminary draft of "City Center"Master Plan
This version of the Master Plan will show the ultimate scope and
sequence of the possibilities identified for the "four corners" of the "City
Center" concept. Issues, potential partnerships, land use projections and
further processes for moving forward will all be detailed in this plan.
. Construction of Phase I & II
(I) Anticipated construction of community space at the CIVIC center
including upgrades to the Skating Center per the contract with the State
of Minnesota and replacement of the activity center space and the (II)
construction of a housing project on the Arona site will begin.
. Establishment of nature and completion of Phases III, IV, V, etc.
This will be the completed vision for the future of the "City Center"
'concept. Detailed land use plans and typical section drawings and
renderings future land and building features will be shown. As in other
plans such as Twin Lakes, Gateway etc., a narrative guide for future
courses of action will be stated.
INITIAL STEPS
There are two steps necessary to successfully initiate the "City Center" process:
1. Authorize staff to assemble a design team. This professional team will be
responsible for being, along with city staff, commissions, committees
and the Council, the catalysts for citizen participation, partnership
5
opportunity leads and design options. They will guide the development of
the "City Center" master plan.
2. Authorize staff to re-institute the planning process for the redevelopment
of the Arona (Activity Center) site. This part of the project will address
not only the needs for housing and the refurbishing and revitalization of
the Arona neighborhood creating increased value in this portion of the
city, it will also serve as a financial resource for future phases of "City
Center" .
In October, the Task Force discussed "What does Roseville City Center mean to you?".
Craig Klausing stated that getting people together was important as he grew up,
such as the corner store. It should be a place where children and adults are
attracted to a mix of activities. It creates a place where people want to go -- "a
place to go to",
Dick Bates said he enjoyed living above a town and people watching and walking
in the community; proximity to uses is important.
Lois Sinn Lindquist said she thinks not of a "city" but of town, village, green
spaces, public art, public/private investments, living environment; an area proud
to visit (visibility); the right kind of walking environment with a sense of
cleanliness, charm and safeness; a place of people comfort.
Jan Vanderwall said city center is year-round; it is not a traffic impedance;
community needs to get to it and through it.
Perri Hettler said she wants to focus on those things that should be preserved
(Central Park); no six story buildings; no large hotels; build on to City Hall; year-
round theatre, small scale unique retail (50th and France).
Ann Hennes said city center should be a tool to keep all of our homes
appreciating in value. Buildings need to be upgraded (small retail, two stories,
umbrellas, water fountains). Think what will be here in the long-range future
(20 I O?).
Don Anderson said the infrastructure Committee recommended creating city
identity through the park and parkway systems. The Oval can be "built on".
There is need for affordable senior housing. Gilman Village has created small
shop concepts; a mix of uses.
Tom Johnson said accessibility is important. Congregating on this area along C
and Lexington is important. Accessibility along both is a key. How can we get
from city hall to the park.
6
Peggy Egli said Central Park should be a year-round promenade. Indoor spaces
like the Como Conservatory would be nice. The Activity Center should be moved
to Lexington and C. A convenience center would be nice; affordable and assisted
senior housing; extend the study to Lexington @ Highway 36 and create identity;
create parkways and boulevards.
Scott Bergs said a City Center has a sense of pride and identity. Build on
positives now available; a location between Minneapolis and St. Paul. Create a
gathering place. Take advantage of streets and 8 to 5 residents.
In November the Task Force Chair Keith Wietecki reviewed past activities and the
November 7th City Tour. He asked that the Task Force consider a definition of
"community center". We do not want pre-dominant retail or large corporate office
(Landmarks) for Roseville City Center. The uses must be complementary to the site and
center and housing could be included in the vision ofthe center.
The difference between "community center" (building) vs. "city center" (place) was
discussed. It is an area or place in the community, not a building. The charge is to pull
Roseville together - put components together that people of the community agree should
be placed together. An "activity center" is a group of activities at a location. A
community center is not the geographic center of the community.
Kim Way asked for likes and dislikes of the November 7th community center tour.
a. Brooklyn Park. All civic campus (a site); nationals guard armory, no
sidewalks, pedestrian pathways, add-on buildings, busy, little planning, a
number of activities, senior center, recreation center, activity rooms, skate
center, not aesthetically pleasing - dark, long hallways, library, city
maintenance garage. No sense of entry or door; federal, state, county, city,
school district, tank display out front; shooting center.
b. Maple Grove. Hard to tell ifthis was going to work today, but will take
20 years to complete; fonner gravel pit site that was being redeveloped by
developer. City takes "back seat" to master plan; created partnerships with
builders/retailers. Partnership could be used in Roseville, just differently;
nice meeting spaces, good indoor/outdoor connection to lake; teen and
senior center heavily used with a theatre; nice walk-through pattern; lots
of good space; revenue from parties; feeling of spaciousness; scattered
group seating; space was gracious and sunny.
c. Plymouth. Where was city hall? Was the community building the city
center; parking problems; senior building not on site and not well planned;
city, school Life-Time partnership; no small child admittance; need to take
advantage of shared parking; be careful of public/private partnerships -
get even treatment; seniors wanted separated site from activity, retail
7
(Cub), movie theatre, fast food in area; located near major thoroughfares;
private development activity wants traffic and visibility.
d. Minnetonka. Civic center only; seniors and city hall together; hockey and
"Marsh" fitness site; no walking access to neighborhood; isolated; water
and decking were beautiful; dog training facility; site isolation.
e. Chaska. Has traditional city center and a community center adjacent to
schools - not near downtown; must drive to the facility; no community
around it; continuous add-on facility. Poor parking; On a mid-Saturday it
was hardly used. Theatre-auditorium art display center. Trying to build
adjacent to neighborhood.
f. Chaska Downtown. Small town Minnesota with town square; could be
placed in a Roseville park or city center; decorative amenities; Highway
212 cuts through site; nice main street.
g. Prior Lake-Dakota Fitness Center. Owned and operated by Native
American community; City of Prior Lake has access to it; was it a city
center for Native American community or meeting space? Discovery Zone
was private operating firm for child care drop-ins; emphasis on buildings;
isolated from everything; shooting range along with recreation center.
h. Edinborough. Too dense, too high, least used facility; the city center was
too dense like big glitz hotel with lobby; not easily connected but two
separate projects; playground and skating amenities are used by small
kids, mothers, seniors; summer use was less - mostly a winter activity
center; closed off to rest of Edina community - will not unify the
community; should be next to Southdale; liked tennis and golf greens.
Centennial Lakes in summer - active; in winter as skating rink; retail is
adjacent to residential; built for users of area; very unnatural; lots of
concrete, engineered spaces.
1. 50th and France. Lighting great; active! Two city personalities; street level
retail and housing above; need multiple stories to be financially feasible;
need public/private partnership; traffic congestion!
J. North St. Paul. No parking; across from public works; no community
entrance.
k. New Brighton. Good example of community center with play area always
busy; an accommodation and connection of many uses; partnership with
Mounds View School District; replaced commercial with residential.
1. Maplewood and Shoreview. Lots of civic uses but not connected;
typically suburban; stand-alone buildings.
8
m. General observations:
find compatible uses to share parking
need to join together the uses; housing and retail with parking at
rear; many centers were not yet part of community
all buildings were not awe-inspiring; in Roseville we use "campus-
like" developments; Center Pointe in Roseville is a good example;
is there a community sense of architectural identity? Would
buildings in Roseville be add-ons?
City Center Vision/Ideas from the November meeting included:
Meeting rooms; updated fire/police facility; outdoor facilities; amphitheater
swimming pool indoor; street level mixed use area; updated government complex
- state, city, county; indoor play area; mixed housing; design that blurs distinction
between indoor and outdoor; specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; teen
center; service center; multi-purpose rooms; child care facilities; volunteer
organization spaces; performance theatre; seminar theater; pathways between the
facilities; land mark for the center; good path access to community, human scale,
campus setting, trees and topographical changes; art/history center; fitness area;
racquetball courts; a safe place to be; home/garden education facility; continuing
community center, indoor tennis, carefully planned parking facilities; major
transit facility, possibly LRT, HR; food service/restaurants; conference facility;
kiosk/and select cart vendors; solarium; storage space for center organizations;
statutes and outdoor art; park and recreation center offices; climbing wall,
intergeneration activities/connections; aesthetic continuity in Central Park; good
and decorative ornamental lighting; religious facility; outdoor track; design
continuity; government center schools, CTV, city, cable system; an architectural
design that breaks from precedent; passive village square; beauty and barber
shops; public access studio; satellite postal service; design for flexible open ended
growth; gallery area; neighborhood promotion; massage center; community
nurse/health services; kitchen/wedding reception area; technology center -
internet access library; child play area; craft castle or room; signage activities
(informational and directional); putting greens; good street accesses; parkway-tree
lined streets with walkways; basketball/volleyball; service-retail; County Road C
as a street; streetscape; monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens.
CATEGORIES OF VISION/IDEAS:
1. Uses; indoor/outdoor
2. Infrastructure
3. Tone, character, sense of place, ambiance
4. Type of users
5. Active/passive
6. Design flexibility for expansion
9
7. Seasonal
8. Public/private
9. Operational/maintenance costs
In January, Steve Sarkozy, City Manager, provided a summary of which uses have been
compiled by the administrative staff. He suggested:
a. Transit Village
b. Mini-Conference Center
c. Cable/TV technology center
d. County service center
e. Housing
, f. Private recreation area
g. Charter schools
h. Indoor playground
1. Home office service center
J. Day care facility
k. Indoor park
1. Neighborhood retail
m. Community library
n. Co-generation of energy
Details regarding" private recreation" uses have been discussed. How immediate
are these uses - when? The private sector is limited by available land. It is not
clear yet whether this is a "best fit" for the City.
Transit - what things may happen in next five to ten years. LRT, commuter'
trains, bike pathways, a bus lane are all possible, some on the same site.
Parking on the site is important. What are the possibilities for ramping. With
more uses, a parking structure would be necessary. Steve Sarkozy said the Task
Force must tell the City" What feels right" and are we ready for this new type of
development.
Kim Way reviewed the vision statement and suggested "testing" what can fit on
the site, after confirming all the uses that should be incorporated as a portion of
the City Center.
The February Task Force meeting was an opportunity for the members to think big and
futuristic. The City Center Planner, Kim Way asked the members to consider three
functional use options for the future: a government center, a recreation center, and
community center.
10
These types of uses could be combined in a number of layouts at the City center site. The
Task Force reviewed the Main Street option, the Parkway Option, and the City Commons
Option. Each have distinct advantages and features.
More discussion occurred with the Roseville Schools and Supt. John Thien - what kind
of synergy could there be with the schools. The two school pools have been talked about
and that the Owasso School could add to the future ofthe City-School cooperative
projects.
Schools will have more extended day and evening opportunities. Schools will
have the young care centers and senior centers throughout the day. These spaces
can be used for meetings at other times.
Indoor pool and play areas will be used evenings and weekends, but could be
matched with education activities, parking, and other space. There is tremendous
demand for gym space.
Kim Way asked for school plans (both districts) illustrating an inventory of spaces
and uses now occupying the space. The four uses proposed on the City Center
site are government center, recreation center, community center, and housing.
In the government center, an updated government building complex was needed
(police size; public works relocation; licensing; add park and recreation; keep
everything now here, here; public safety building).
In the future the library could be combined with a Technology Center. Post office
and licensing may be a possibility, even combined with a private servi~e center.
Where should the technology hub be located in Roseville? Leave the City Center
design open for these options. Within the Community Center" gathering-learning
spaces" , the Task Force highlighted uses such as:
o Multi-purpose rooms and teen center
o Conference rooms
o Seminar and performance theatre
o Public access/cable studios
o Child and senior care facilities
o Art display center and outdoor display
o Community health clinic center and services (related but not in a government
center)
a lower priority because of space
perhaps put health service center at Fire Stations
o Technology center and conference center + studio + hub
o History archives and center or" Hallway of Memories"
o Hands-on arts activities within community center
11
o Year-round solarium indoor/outdoor space, especially as a design element of
architecture which integrates indoor and outdoor uses and connects them
Within the recreation center:
o Recreation swimming facilities (Jan Van der Wall will provide pool
conditions or schedules)
o Indoor children's play area (eagle's nest or discovery zone)
o Child care facilities for recreation users
o Fitness center (private facility possibility)
o Racquetball courts (private facility possibility)
o Indoor Tennis (private facility possibility)
o Basketball/volley ball (private facility possibility)
o Climbing wall (private facility possibility)
o Indoor track (private facility possibility)
o Massage center (private facility possibility)
o Putting green (private facility possibility)
o Oval - public
o Ice arena - public
What keeps a government /community center vibrant? Who are the users we want in this
center? Should the concept follow? Integrate three concepts into one place, be blendable,
fluid. The project must have" connectivity" .
The fire and public works facilities may be more industrial in nature, may not fit in
accounting center.
Are there" special needs" facilities that could be included?
Parking should be considered an integral part of each concept.
Residential characteristics of the center may include:
do transit and residential uses work together?
could a transit site go on mobile home site?
does transit site include more density surrounding it?
encourage housing within Comprehensive Plan (guide it)
how could the city connect uses across transit lines?
does there need to be a better government center connection to
Central Park?
design an interconnected campus site.
All three concepts included the three primary uses but had different emphasis. For
example, the Parkway concept has wide green spaces and pedestrian activity along
12
Lexington Parkway and County Road C. Approximately 1000 parking spaces, in a ramp,
would be needed to serve the expanded government and recreation centers. The new uses
are oriented to the parkways; the parking spaces are behind the new uses. From the
northwest comer of Lexington and County Road C a winter garden faces Central Park.
The recreation center extends from the current skating center south to County Road.
The government center remains at the comer of Lexington and C.
The Main Street concept is oriented to a new north south road which connects County
Road C and Woodhilll in a straight north south fashion, just east of the skating center.
This main street would allow for "drop offs' at many different entry points to the skating
and recreation center, the community center and the government center. A pool would be
placed south of the skating center. The government center would remain on the comer of
Lexington and County Road C, while the community center would face W oodhill. A
winter garden would be constructed directly east, across the main street from the skating
center. Parking will be east of the garden. A public safety (police and fire) building
would be located at W oodhill and Lexington. The main street becomes the open space
entrance to the winter garden.
The City Square/Commons Concept creates an internal focus of central open space
with all uses fronting on the square. Recreation and a pool are adjacent to the skating
center. The government center faces county Road C; the public safety building faces
Lexington; the community center is located at the comer of Lexington and Woodhill.
Service parking would be attached to the skating center. The main parking would be
located under the city square.
In March the Task Force reviewed City Center Concepts:
Kim Way described the three City Center Concepts (Parkway Concept; Main Street Uses;
and a City Square Concept) with four major uses. The charge to the Task Force was
discussed; what are the steps (development strategies) necessary to implement the plan.
The end product must have a strategy based on economic reality.
Kim Way described the program, noting that the design and scale or size will be a future
step. He challenged the Task Force to define the "City Center area or district". Details are
needed on the "Program" which is to fit into the areas, the "boxes" that hold the uses;
size of the boxes; and the location on the site. The City Center must take into account the
opportunity (and value created) at the edges of the City Center.
The Task Force eventually must prioritize the proposed uses; i.e., pools vs police
facilities. In addition the Task Force must answer where does public works facility go
and whether the City needs a new public safety facility? By defining the uses and the
market, the consultants will be able to create a spatial relationship for the required
parking
13
The Task Force agreed the visioning process has been completed, but a reality check
must allow the Task Force to deal with immediate concerns.
The Task Force, as a consensus, evaluated the three concepts and found that the City
Square concept best fit their value statements in part because the" Square" gives a heart,
focus, or center to the community; a sense of place. The City Square concept works best
because it does not rely on the street system and calm traffic on both County Road C and
Lexington. The City Square should be an "intense" design with a critical mass and
activity on the site, while not overwhelming the site. The Task Force preferred more
density as in the City Square. Yet, there is a lack of central parking accessible to all. City
Hall could be moved if it allowed the Community Center activities to thrive. Moving the
pool away from the skating center may help each functions better. A Main Street concept
could be built into the City Square concept but a sprawling City Center parking lot was
not favored.
Parking along the north edge (W oodhill side) across from the shopping center appears
feasible, with smaller service parking adjacent to uses. Approximately 1,000 parking
spaces are needed to support all uses. Transit stops along the railroad may require more
parking. The height of parking structures is a major concern. There is a concern with fire
access near the parking ramp turning movements.
The Winter Garden should link diagonally across Lexington, from City Square and
Central Park.. Performances at Central Park may be enhanced by expanded program
space within City Square. An arts and craft area within the Winter Park may work well.
These sites should be "intimate", providing enhanced dynamics among participants.
r
The Task Force asked if there should be a priority; what happened first (implementation
strategy). Dennis Welsch described the community planning and hearing process that
would be used to gain Planning Commission and public input (and eventually seek
project approval. From the City Council).
TASKFORCE RECOMMENDATION (March,1999):
The Task Force consensus refined the City Center District boundaries. Staff was directed
to prepare a map and language for the Comprehensive Plan" District" amendment.
The entry to City Center along Lexington and "C" should be reconstruction into a
parkway as has been previously approved in the Pathway Plan and the Comprehensive
Plan.
George Reiling, Sr. described his view of the development history in Roseville.
14
NEXT STEPS
Kim Way noted that Phase I of the Task is near completion. On the Task Force charge,
the monthly meetings process for this program was to take six to nine months.
The schedule includes a Planning Commission process. After the City reviews the Task
Force report and analyzes the impacts, the Task Force would then respond to the input
from the City.
The Task Force found that the approach/process is currently an "undone" idea. and
encouraged further review at the Task Force level prior to proposing a recommendation
to the Planning Commission. Then, the Task Force should be very clear about the
direction sent. The Task Force should continue to work, gain input and should hear from
others. .
Kim was directed to continue the refinement of the City Square Concept.
15
05/03/99 10:09 FAX 651 223 5318
LAW OFFICES
, -, ,
CO.(""
Dept.
~f.
Fill ~
~01
Co.
Phone'
Fu'
ROSEVILLE :MOBILE HOME PARK
RESIDENTS
TIle City of R05eUIIIe IuJ5 pi... for your park........
City Center task Force Meeting #8
Tbunday, March 18, 1999
Tbe City center development plan will affect Roseville
Mobile Home Park. Task foree members mapped-out tbe
plot for the future eity center project which ~
your park!
Without a Park Closing OrdinaDce, you may be left with
NOTHING! !-no relocation costs and no buy-outs of your
homes.
~ ~ ~~'ij' wrn ~@@.....
PI rli Meeting
Where: RosevilJe Public Library
WIleD: Saturday, May 81:00.2:30
?? Any Quest1cns~
Ca.U Danna. Ba.nson of lot #330 at 483-6698 or JlirJam at APAO @
(681) 644-8825. APAC 1&anan-~ tenant's 1.]-mon1brres1d~"-s
afman'\dlctured. (mcb11.e) home parks.
~'~ .:;: _!At. .~~ C';
... ..' ~
,. '1. '-.
..... ... ':..
AJIj~ .. Q F ChIJ~
2395 Unj"n',fi~}I Allenue West. Suite 202 5,. Ptlul. MN 55';'. Tel.. (6~(i~.5S2.s EtA (651) 642-0060
. .ov~
-(L) ~~
;;
iliJ);~~{ ~tW' t.kt~ " [1~iIillti1lli;mR'! ~ ~: ~ ~o 9.n:r~ jj ~'B~""~: ...~0,~ '
:~'~~X:~*''''::.~::.~:::~~"::::~~,~~~,~~~~'X,:~",::,~~~'>>.~~~,~~,'. ~@.":-"':-~~",~~~::'":::';.:.":~~". ....x:-'}.~':-~:::::.':~:::.':,':>>~~~::.~..::.":::.-::-.":-"::-,::::.~'::-":-~..~':-.~:::~,
:::.:.w-":~~w.....~,.~
T~"">>\ ~""... "':-:y~.;:: ~< "= *:.~ r~"""'" ..... .. :;;:...:;::<<....... ...... ..x..... .... ;';","';.;.;".~........... V" ..... ..... ...... ................. :::':';':':-;..,.
. ......,. .................... .N......... ....:;:: ;.oX'::... .....;.,:.. ..;:~. ::~.............. :-,,' ....-:-..... ....x .."'.~~
~\W~}r~~%~~~~1&~.~;..::::~~~>>~_<<t~R~w.mmr;~~~~~~tW~~~~W~8~%~~~:~::\i%\.k..~.::~~~~~~~~~1K~i~~'"
~?t~ J.!t.(..~{?""1..@.< ;i. :';.' 6'J$ !. ; (>' ~ '. ~~r*'J!!~~.k~{~~~~~~W$l~~~*@illt~rnt\m~~1~~_:$t~~~ ~
Thus far the City has adopted a "piecemeal" approach to the City Center.
What is needed is a 21 st century model for what a City Center can be.
The John Rose Oval and Ice Arena are fixes.
The new City Center should be a multi-use facility based on a public/private partnership.
The existmg layers of government can be an asset and resource: State, County,
Government Center, Cable Communications - Productions, Media One
There needs to be points where City Council and the Task Force interface.
We need to have forward thinking.
Unsure how the VFW can fit into the City Center?
Web site can be a way to communicate the City Center process to the community - Jerry
Beck is responsible for the City of Roseville web page.
Density is okay.
The City Center needs to have diversity.
"Think Big" - This is our challenge. Roseville City Center will be so successful that it will
be featured on the cover of national magazines.
We need to think of possibilities not problems.
We need vision and excitement.
Ifwe are going to do it, let's do it right. Put in all the extras.
Langton and Acorn Parks are examples of the City providing a good quality facility.
The City is set with park land and now needs to focus on bringing them up to standards
The City needs some signature pieces as part of the park system.
Central Park is one of the great assets ofRoseville. It is one of the busiest parks in the
metro area.
Centennial Lakes could be a model for Roseville City Center
Vail, Colorado has done a good job at creating a walkable and exciting city center.
The City Center needs to be more than a government center.
The City has done a good job at redevelopment of the 18 acre school property south of
Lake Owasso for new housing.
City and residents need more meeting rooms.
A new public safety building is needed.
The City Center should have a mix of uses.
A public/private partnership is also important.
The community has a building height phobia. 10-12 Stories would be maximum
acceptable.
~f6
\~~L'
Quality lighting & paving should be important considerations in the planning and design of
the City Center and in linking it to other areas of the community
Vista 2000 has provided a good base of information about what the community wants.
There will probably need to be public referendum on the City Center
We may be pushing the envelope in terms of time. Next fall is the last term for three
existing councilors
Intensity of development and traffic will be the two major issues
South and west neighborhoods will be more favorable toward City Center concept. North
and east neighborhoods may not see need.
Streetscape linkages will be an important element in unifying the community. The
Lexington Avenue corridor, from Como to Shoreview can be an effective linkage.
Ellerbe Becket needs to push the envelope of this project.
The community has already been through the process of considering a "Community
Center" .
Several good groups of people were involved in the process
The elements of a Community Center are:
Centralize all city agencies
Public Works Department relocated
New Public Safety Building - Ideally located in City Center.
Relocate mobile home park - Twin Lakes Area?
Burlington Northern rail line abandoned and R.O.W. utilized for light raiVcommuter
rail. (Solves St. James Addition rail issue)
County Road B/Lexington - Optional site for community center
Good Location
Pressure to keep park
Could include teen center - walk to/from High School
City has dispersed some community facility needs to schools - Gymnasiums, gymnastics
facility .
Continued need for more studio space, senior center/teen center, workout facility/small
gym, pool.
Shoreview is a good model for a community center that would meet the needs of the
Roseville community.
The key components of the City Center should include:
The John Rose Oval is a great community resource. There is a need for more creative uses
of it, like the skate park.
Ice Arena
Community Center
Public safety building
Need to centralize City activities
Restaurant (?)
Site Size is an issue. How much can we fit on this site?
Apartments border site to the north. The land to the west contains construction rubble.
This land may be difficult or expensive to build on.
The Activity Center is old and in a bad location. It needs to move to the City Center
The site can then be redeveloped.
County Road BlLexington is another site in the City available for redevelopment.- Public
Safety Building, park?
There probably is enough ball diamonds and ice rinks.
This project will probably go to referendum.
If the community goes ahead with the City Center what happens in the next 20 years?
NIMBYISM and Financing will be key issues.
Population over 55, conservative community.
RosevilJe has never had school bond issue fail.
The task force needs to take pulse of community. The results of Decision Resources'
survey provides a good first step in the process.
The City Center could be the location for centralized bus service for the community with
the potential for a Roseville Park n' Ride.
Roseville needs a "Lasting Piece". Create a planning & design framework for the City
Center that can be implemented over time,
What can and cannot happen?
What are the constraints?
How much stuff can we fit?
Density and building height will be issues.
RosedaJe Center is the tallest building in Roseville and it is nine stories.
A City Center "Campus" is not the model. The Civic Complex is an 8:00 - 5:00 place.
A City Center needs to have:
1. 24-hour interest - self policing
2. Attract as much private investment as possible
The Recreation component needs to cater to both tuxedo and sweat socks crowds.
The John Rose Oval is self-sustaining, internationaJ venue.
City Center should be:
First Class.
Quality materials, quality maintenance.
The most uses and amenities for the least public money.
Fun to come to.
---
The City Center should have an automobile orientation. It should also be well connected
by sidewalks and trails.
The transit circulator should connect the community to the City Center.
The rail corridor should be reserved as a transitlbusway.
There is a general lack of use able space in the existing civic center.
Larpenter Avenue streetscape is a positive step in improving the image of the City.
Funding fTom ISTEA.
A new Public Safety building is needed.
Public Works Department doesn't need to be in City Center
Lexington Avenue should be a boulevard.
County Road B/Lexington is another project the City is considering.
The options include; all park, a public building or the historic society/arts center
Activity Center needs to move to City Center
City Hall will continue to be part of City Center.
Parking will be an issue and additional development may require a parking ramp.
A community center should be a component of the City Center. It doesn't need to be a
Taj Mahal. A community center needs a 300 seat community room
There is probably not a need for a gymnasium. The City has two new full-size
gymnasiums as part of existing school facilities.
The Roseville gymnastic facility is another new asset to the community.
A walking track around the John Rose Oval might be a nice addition.
The City Center needs to be a place that the community can call "home". A place to:
To learn
For government
For fiiendship
To be Proud of
For seniors to meet
A game room for the youth ofRoseville to enjoy.
Facilities that provide quality educationaVmedia resources to keep the kids off the streets.
Learning/Education should be key functions of the City Center.
The City Center should provide the opportunity for seniors to share their knowledge with
children - Mentoring programs.
Ideally there should be a referendum in November 1999
The Greatest challenges are:
How to sell it?
Don't make it too glitzy.
Develop cooperation with the schools.
Pay attention to special interest groups.
---------.--..-
We need to do it right!
Learn from past mistakes, the John Rose Oval and Ice Arena
Develop a strong image.
Lots of activity, uses.
Pedestrian activity
Traffic free
Density
Cedar Square West may be a model.
The City Center needs to provide for a range of customers.
Arts
Housing
Families spending a day
The Burlington Northern Railway is an opportunity. It currently only serves one user,
Minnesota Commercial.
The City Center is not city government. It should have the community outreach part of
city government
Public Works can move
A new Public Safety building is needed
We need to be sensitive to public politics. The recreational lobby will be focused on a
community center.
A Successful City Center strategy will:
Provide an articulated vision that meets established goals without compromise
Be financially achievable
Provide a place that people will identify as the City Center - the image ofRoseville.
Provide a framework for future development.
The City Center includes:
A collection of government buildings
City Administration
Police/Fire Departments
Parks & Recreation Department
There is need for a new Public Safety building. This facility would include:
Parking lot for volunteer parking (60 cars)
Three bay garage to house fire apparatus.
One drive-through fire apparatus bay.
Hose Drying Tower - 25 feet high
The City currently uses training facilities in St. Paul
A City Center location for the Public Safety building would be ideal - The Public Safety
building should be located on Lexington Avenue as close to T.H. 36 as possible.
A new Public Safety building is more important than its location.
The City Center should have uses that attract people.
The John Rose Oval and Ice Arena would be more related to a Community Center
A Community Center would include:
Pool
Exercise Room
Racquetball Courts
Police department has specific space needs. They have a demand for lots of storage,
separate female officer and employee facilities, more office space, police library.
The police department handles a number of juvenile case. There is an important issue of
privacy related to juveniles.
There is a need for a larger squad room and more interview rooms.
A joint Public Safety building would be the ideal situation.
The current location of police and fire service is fine. The Roseville community identifies
the civic area with city government.
The Public Works Department currently houses the police vehicles. This is not an ideal
situation. This is not the secure area that they need. Secured parking is necessity.
There is also an inside firing range that is important to police operations.
The Public Safety building needs to be on a main drag.
No closer to commercial than they currently are.
If starting over with location, keep it centraL
Think of a centrally located complex with spokes out into the community
The City Center includes:
Community Center
Public Safety building
Government ServiceslRecreation
The police department has always been part of something else. A rreestanding Public
Safety building would give them more autonomy.
The police department employs 1/3 of all city employees.
The City Center has great potential.
The City has spent the last 2-3 years investing in the quality of the physical environment
through the introduction landscaping; fountains, flowers, signage, etc.
Need to preserve existing green space.
The City Center needs to have an attractive and high quality environment. Water, flowers,
a sense of place and pleasing materials.
City Council was not on the same page in tenns of 1994 - 1995 priorities.
The timing is now critical in tenns of the financial position of the City.
The City has the ability to leverage about $15 million in bonds over the next 3-5 years.
There is a concern that this project and process has credibility with community.
Holding community meetings in specific neighborhoods would be the ideal way to involve
as many members of the community in the process, as possible.
The Neighborhood Watch groups may be the best way to organize these neighborhood
meetings.
The City newsletter and Web site will be other useful communication tools.
It might be useful review the process that was used to bring the John Rose Oval to its
current location.
The City Center needs to make sense for Roseville.
The Public Safety building is a component that makes sense.
Don't create the image that "government" is getting bigger.
City government is just a part of the City Center.
The potential to construct a roof over the John Rose Oval may make sense, but not by
itself It has to be discussed as part of the wider strategy.
15,OOOpeoplelmonth use activity center. If the Activity Center functions move to the City
Center this provides a base line for understanding potential usership.
The City Center process needs to build community support.
The process needs to be more conclusive in its final results.
Peoples names involved in the project need to become synonymous with the process.
Press releases can help to raise the profile of the project and process.
The City Center strategy needs to be reasonable and doable. Key components might
include; market rate housing, office space, recreation, senior housing, retail, entertainment.
The police and fire departments have space needs. A combined new Public Safety building
is being considered
The Parks and Recreation Department needs to be part of the City Center as they will be
involved in its long-term management.
The financial aspect of the City Center needs to be considered. The City may have bond
funding to use for this project over the next 3-5 years. Local option sales tax is another
potential source of funding. The City should also look for funding ITom private sector
partners.
City Hall is currently underutilizing a key comer site in the City. City Hall could be
expanded to take advantage ofthis important location with public spaces that overlook
and link to Central Park. The Burlington Northern Rail Line presents a longer term
opportunity for commuter or light rail transit. The City Center could have a major transit
station on the line.
The Activity Center will functi~n in the short term until a new Community Center can be
developed. While the current Activity Center needs ongoing maintenance, there is nothing
major that will prevent it ITom being used for the foreseeable future. There is a concern
about employee satisfaction working in the current facility.
Centennial Lakes/Edinburgh could be a model for Roseville City Center.
The first Community Center proposal had a gymnasium component, arts space, preschool.
The referendum was for $8 million and the facility was estimated at $6 million. There was
no pool proposed as part of the plan.
The new City Center should have:
Some kind of gymnasium - Lifetime Fitness?
Leisure pool - Indoor and outdoor
A social recreation building, a meeting place
A successful City Center strategy will:
Have a pool
Survey the community ahead of any final decision making
Involve the school district
Have an open public process
Specific Central Park improvements would involve updating the facilities that are currently
there. The Jaycee shelter needs to be renovated. The parking problem needs to be solved.
One of the products of the Vista 2000 process is the new housing development on the
school land to the south of Lake Owasso. This is a quality development that the City can
use as a model for future public redevelopment projects.
The other focus of Vista 2000 was on creating a greater diversity of housing in Roseville.
As a result the City has new low income housing that is working well.
Roseville has a real sense of "neighborhood".
Many neighborhoods in the City have block parties.
Central Park has been a great asset for the community.
Roseville residents use Shoreview and Fairview community centers
Physical fitness is part of the community.
Roseville is about families.
It is difficult to define specific neighborhoods in Roseville. Probably the clearest since of
neighborhood is defined by the street you live on. This is reinforced by the block parties.
Can you
The business community is also an important part ofRoseville. The businesses are not
well connected to community.
The Suburban Chamber of Commerce, which started in Roseville, represents business.
Their focus is primarily on business retention / new business development. Many business
people visit Central Park at lunch. A fitness center might cater to the business community.
Roseville has provided a lot of new housing, especially housing products other than single
family detached (i.e. townhomes)
There is a need for more senior housing, especially one level homes.
Potential for "continuum of care" housing.
Some existing senior housing - Center Point
The City also needs to focus on getting new families moving to Roseville.
There is a concern amongst existing residents about the maintenance of senior residents
property.
Roseville is a collection of post war homes.
It is stable and attractive in general, but some area are "going to seed".
Young families leave when children reach school age.
Schools may become a real issue? The latest round of testing showed lower than average
test scores.
Roseville has no center.
The City Center should be a series of buildings with lots of Chann
Like a European market area.
The infrastructure for the City Center should set the overall ambiance, establish the big
picture.
"City Center" is not the center of Roseville
County Road B and Dale Street is the Statistical population center ofRoseville.
Maplewood community pool popular facility.
Play pool - children
Lap pool - Diving - exercise
Wann pool- seniors
A pool is an important component of a community center and the City Center
Pedestrian bridges across Lexington and County Road C to Central Park so that families
can move freely around the City Center.
Roseville's physical attributes "Lack Chann".
Need input from Roseville residents.
Aesthetics will be an important concern of residents
Need to have collaboration in developing City Center.
Develop joint memberships with other cities.
Think oflinkages with St. Paul.
*Collaborate with school district.
City recreation programs can interface and coordinate with school day.
School bus linkage from school to community center/Central Park. 70% of Roseville
grade school students participate in City sponsored after school programs.
* Adequate pathways and general accessibility should be an important goal of the City
Center
*Community Center
*Safety - Pedestrian crossings, either controlled at grade or above grade.
Adequate lighting to make the City Center feel safe at night.
The City Center should include:
Food / Beverage establishments
Not just a snack bar
Family style restaurant
Coffee shop / Cafe (Caribou Coffee)
Ice cream
The City Center should be connected to Roseville Circulator transit service.
North of County Road C2, Roseville is oriented to Shoreview. We need to engage these
neighborhoods in the process.
The City Center should be a focal point for people's lives.
Music, Dance, Arts
City government - yes
The City Center process needs to have maximum community input.
The City Center process will provide many challenges ahead.
Environmental concerns cut across all committees.
Pathways and linkages are an important part of the community.
Roseville has a real "Sense of community".
Burlington Northern Rail Line has great potential. The City could bring back a trolley or
steam train to link to other parts of the Twin Cities.
Automobile congestion is a concern. Alternative transit modes should be integrated into
the planning and design of the City Center.
Tax Base - Will tax revenues increase? What new revenue can be created?
Historic tax situation
What new stresses will be put on city resources?
What new costs will occur trom these stresses?
Planning
Snow Removal
Inspections
Concern that we do not taking park land for development.
What is government's role in this type of development?
Does the public sector have the necessary business expertise or development knowledge?
Will the City Center create competition for Rosedale Center?
Health care facilities - For the middle/upper middle class? Or all people?
If there is housing in the City Center, what types of dwellings should be provided?
Lower cost housing would probably not be part of City Center.
The underlying issue with housing is between the "have and have nots".
University retirement community might provide a model for Roseville City Center -
Masonic Center. There is a need for more housing families and seniors. A retirement
center.
Define housing carefully.
The June 1998 Community Survey suggested that 52% of respondents did not want hotel.
We should look to neighboring communities as models; White Bear Lake?
City Center businesses need to illustrate their benefit for the community.
There is an issue of "bigness". How big should the City Center be?
Development and Redevelopment often brings perceived and real traffic congestion. The
City Center strategy needs to define the pace and timing of development, so that the
support infTastructure can absorb it.
Does the current zoning support the concept of the City Center. What new zoning
categories or guidelines need to be in place to support the concept.
The City Center should preserve or add to the aesthetics ofRoseville.
Make the community more attractive.
Enhance, expand Central Park
Preserve Wetlands, don't disrupt the environment.
Create something uniquely Roseville.
Integrate environment into buildings.
Trails / pathways an important part ofRoseville. People need to be given an alternative to
the automobile.
Shoreview has a great community center. People really love it.
Roseville needs a community center like Shoreview
Brooklyn Center also has an attractive community facility.
RoseviUe needs an auditorium space.
Edinburgh could be a model for the City Center.
It is a real public/private partnership.
It has a great variety things, mixed use activities.
It is very participatory.
They have spaces for proms and weddings.
The City Center should have a pool, water slides, entertainment.
SALL Y OLSON 2838 Aglen St 489-8811 Wednesday, 9:00 a.m.
(HOUSING) (NoStar October 14
Bank)
JOANNE CHABOT 254 McCarrons Blvd N. 487-4123 Wednesday, 10:00 a.m.
(LEISURE) October 14
DENNY McCLELLAND 1385 Roselawn Ave. W. 644-0230 Wednesday, 11 :00 a.m.
(ENVIRONMENT) October 14
HARRY WERNECKE 475 Centennial Dr. 481-1904 Wednesday, 2:00 p.m.
(TRANSPORTATION) October 14
LOUELLEN ESSEX 1968 Skillman Ave W. 631-8413 Wednesday I 3:00 p.m.
(PUBLIC SAFETY) October 14
EDWARD ROBERTS 3022 W. Owasso Blvd 484-1162 Wednesday I 4:00 p.m.
(ECONOMIC Octoer 14
DEVELOPMENT)
VISTA 2000 CHAIR INTERVIEWS
Prepared by: Community Development Department
Dated: October 13, 1998
Q:\CITYCENnVIST AchairlnterSched .doc
(L 9\<i
\\:$'" J
October 6, 1998
Mr. Thor Bank
2185 Draper Avenue
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Dear Mr. Bank:
The City of Roseville would like your assistance!
As Chair of the Transportation sector study group, for VISTA 2000, you provided essential
information throughout the process. We would once again like your input on the City Center
project.
Mr. Kim Way, of Ellerbe Becket, is in the process of interviewing key "players" in the process, and
would like the opportunity to visit with each of the VISTA 2000 Chairpersons. It is anticipated the
interview will last about 45 minutes.
Mr. Way has set aside Wednesday, October 14th, and/or Thursday, October 15th for the
respective interviews. Attached is a schedule indicating the date/time set aside for your interview.
If this is not convenient, please call Pat Morrison of our staff (490-2279) to reschedule another
time on either the 14th or 15th.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
City of Roseville
Dennis Welsch
Community Development Director
Attachment: Interview Schedule: VISTA 2000 Chairs
Q:\CITYCENnlnterviewLetterVista 2000.doc
\\)-~, '\~
~ ~
.
CITY CENTER
(Revised) INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
With: Kim Way, Ellerbe Becket
Karl Keel
Public Works Director
Friday, October 2
Dick Forletti
Fire Chief
Friday, October 2
Paul Wood
Police Chief
Friday, October 2
Steve North
Asst. Manager
Friday, October 2
Ed Burrell
Finance Director
Monday, October 5
Bob Bierscheid
Parks & Recreation Dir.
Monday, October 5
10:30 a.m.
11 :30 a.m.
1 :00 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
1 :00 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
Prepared: October 1, 1998
Q:\CITYCENT\lnterviews Dept Heads.doc
~O /\ ~~
CITY CENTER STAFF MEEETING
September 17,1998,10:30 a.m., City Hall
NOTES
1. Present: Bob Bierscheid, John Carpenter, Kim Way, Dennis Welsch
2. Notice of First Task Force Meeting
+ to be held October 8, 1998
+ Morten & Assoc. will attend meeting (Dave Fiebelkorn)
3. Committee Members
+ 19 potential members now - will be interviewing September 21st
+ Meeting must be videotaped for record as city policy
+ Kim provided draft first agenda (see handout)
+ Introduction of Team and Task Force by Dennis and/or Council designate
+ Location - City Council Chambers
Add another monitor
+ Handout of staff and resources (Glen VanWormer, Dan Soler, Transit/Light and
Heavy Rail)
+ Handout Charge and Ground Rules
+ Work program and schedule
+ Prepare maps of existing conditions, area and potential projects/plans in Comp
Plan.
+ Prepare list of mixed use City Center concepts in Metro
4\ Demographics Information
+ Resident population multifamily and single family
+ 60% turn-over in multifamily over two years
+ 8% turn-over in single family over two years
+ Roseville Center and regional draw - check with David for additional info
+ Market to school district boundaries for recreational services
+ High school students and families
5. Other Business
+ Historical perspective from Bob B.
+ White paper on City Center concepts from Bob Bierscheid to be part of first
packet.
INTERVIEWS WITH COUNCIL:
September 21 - September 25
September 28 - October 2
45 minutes
23,24
29
Q:\CITYCENT\CITY CENTER TASK FORCE NOTES 091798.doc
~~
~-0
Roseville City Center Study and Task Force
Draft Revised: 8/14/98
Assuming the Council selects Task Force members by August 28, 1998 the following outline has
been prepared for the work of the Task Force.
1, Meeting Schedule:
Once per month, beginning at 6:30 pm through 9:00pm
September 24, 1998
October 22, 1998
November 19, 1998
December 17, 1998
2. Staff to prepare a list of community leaders (especially Vista 2000) for Kim Way to
interview prior to September 24.
Interviews would be at City Hall with Kim Way.
Pat Morrison (Community Development, 490-2279) will handle scheduling.
3. Request Task Force to review interview list and add to list of community leaders who
should be interviewed.
4. Request Task Force to adopt a set ofmles for operation. September 24, 1998,
5. Report to Task Force on interviews and demographics and trends. September 24.
6. Request Task Force to add/delete Discovery Workshop participants from list submitted
by Kim Way and Staff at September 24, 1998 meeting
7. Discovery Workshops -learn about vision and details needed by each group.
8. Request Task Force to nominate a Chair person at their October 1998 meeting.
9. Prepare for Design Event in Late October.
10. Further work...
Q:\CITYCEN1\TF-SCHED.WPD
\0: ~<\
~'\J
.'
f',*~
VISTA 2000
Study Group Chairs
Sally Olson, 2619 Herschel St 633-3444
Housing
Joanne Chabot, 254 McCarrons Blvd N 487-4123
Leisure
Denny McClelland, 1385 Roselawn Ave W 644-0230
Environmental Issues
Thor Bank, 2185 Draper Ave 631-0271
Transportation
Harry Wernecke, 475 Centennial Drive 481-1904
Transportation
Louellen Essex, 1968 Skillman Ave W 631-8413
Public Safety
Edward Roberts, 3022 W Owasso Blvd 484-1162
Economic Development
Don Anderson, 948 W County Rd D 484-6039
Parks
Keith Weitecki, 2428 Farrington Circle 481-7890
Long Range Planning
'5 i
'" 00'
:..a.G
~~
;:J ';:;
.", 1)
" '"
..sa
::..r
1) "
" 't:
~ ~
~~
~ 1)
~ c
o 1)
~u
~ ;>. .
~G
,~ .s
'"
,,'-
,g so
~
Co
e "
o '"
U 0
.0
1) 1)
-5 ~
E.",
:: ~
1)-
= 1)
""-5
5~
~:.:
;,j
:..: "-
... ,1)
.0 "'"
; ~
1)~
:1 t}
::r,_
'J ,:,
... on
rJ .-
=Q
.~ ~
:I') c:
o "
:>::u
~ ~,
~0
0'-'
The City of
D[~"'~
.I.~~
Minnesota
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
ROSEVlLLE, MINNESOTA 55113-1899
-.~':-r -'j
<I>
-
gg~
~'Q
II
. 0
-0
~M
"'0
~
5i
~",j
Z::-'j'
0- ..
-Q
!;: c2 j
U:"j'
~ifi "
~c,
o
Z
u
E
~
1J'
::'"
;":":::<:7\
,.D~'="
"t:: ~-~
~2~
~~'c:-;
~o< '
r:1
::!
(I)
.~
.......
0
Z ~
0.0 '"
I:: 0
'0-< g<
~ ~
(I)
::r: '......,
0
b
to
M
d
:E
...,
.~
tI) ~
'"'
(i) :::=
~ ~>
~
0 tI)
0
€ p:;
......
Q) 0
g. c
'"' u
~
~ .8
';1 "'0
= =
Q) 'CIS
~'.,~....
'"' u u
0..'- ';::
a ",ti ~
8iSa
Q). 8 ~,
...c:,j\~ ,~-,
~'5 5
:::c..>u
=:cC'
~:,u r;J'
C''---' Q)'
,"g;i!tifS;(
Q),.c ......,.
;;~iF
~":fj =;.
~S.rci :::I,.
~,'il =..8.
~"~ ,~
g1..~ :::I,.
'"'= -g
.~ CIS~,
..., ,(I.)~
='..., (1.)"
CIS CIS '""
.~ ~ -:0".
'Q..u..r.:
~.8~
(I.) = CIS
E5.g ~
..., bJ)~ o..c W (1.)...... (1.)'" (I.) CIS.....'"
! ~. :; ~> .~ ~ :6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ] ~ a ~
::~(I.)'~ g (I.)~~&'5:@~;:;U)~ ;::
g * -fi :: '"3 ~ ~ CIS g. '0 -5 .8 'g ~ g
'(I.) aj 'oJ) 0;;:1 ~ ,~ (I.) 0 ~ (I.) C (I.) ""';i: .~
..c .~ .= :6' !;j ~ 1S ..... '!': .gf +-> :::I .~ ..s,-fi
"",",.:ao""~P:;""""Q)~'Euc>~, ....
~ :: ..=1~.s 9(1j ~ ~'~ w, ~ .8:B u~
~],i.S ~ -B i ~l-B'~ ':e ~ (I.) .8 '" ,~
.~ ],~l .8 .;:: ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ;@ 5~ ~ ;0
'6b~ 'Ol t: CIS".S :::I "6b 0 ;,P E-< 8 :>u P:; ~
'(1.), ,;::.; , " 0 .;:: :::s "U .~ ca ~ ~ CIS <:.. .t>' oW
..Q: ~,~ ,12 .8~'.5 '"'..c op:;J;: (1.)] c= .
,.CI.I'-'.'CIS:'.:si:: ,u.(I.). ' ,"',~ ',r.3"'2')'~' ='0 ' ':1'.,p a
'<<fO::~':,,", '~ ..r.:' 0' '::t':I :::I"..., 'c"'...'.:= P:; O:':'itI,. 0..
'" ca '>, 'ci'Z, ...-.....:38 ~'-:S ''''~:88 .C;.):~ ..'
~ .:.0:, t':I", 'oJ) 'oJ) '<<I 0;;:1 ",'"' QIJ,~ t':I 'c 0 ;-;;" 'CJ)'~
Q ,",',,!> .,.,,:.,=.c:L,'" .,t':I", ".0.. q) >'(I.)::r::.. .u &~H A:::",:"..
';,....' 't':I:/>;>",:,':=:"0"0 '. c';t,,",,:- ...C::' .g';>.i>. ",..., ==::',=',I'~iil\O,
t) c....,..,""'o ":c!,-:::::...... "CIS;. (I.) ";:! :(1.)......0 ,.t"!:.., 8 ':::10' .::1,.,..... .
, -,~.. - .. ..c - .... ...:~::~
,~=>,..!.,~ ..r.:~.>-.,s' $,...,..., 9 .g "cv::O:~~E6V
;'~!;~ .,~, ,g>:~I'l.B:~'~'l]u i~:: 'g ~'g:~'
'";3 ..r.: i."'''' CI.I t::o....,.= p.."O"' . ~ ;::';i"" ...
,'oJ).$; ,(I.). ,= c: ~ ,.=. ":;::"p (I.) 0 .", E'ilot' i~:?~
.~ 'ti,~ '')', ~.s. ~,8' t':Io-fi ~ : ~':~ 0.:E ,-
,~ ~ C1 ~ ~ 6"~~:E ,i: .8....... ~~ ~, I~. ~.'.':.'.'~.
~:@ ~'~" ~ ~. ] ~".~ .~ ~'.~ ~. ~ l'g:e::'~
0........ O,'oJ)tr.o ~,!:1 t':I.9 -g c.. ~ 0 =0 tr.o Q QJ).~
00 0 O. t':I. '8 ~ tit':l = ~ U ' . CIS '.. = ,:tI)
~~I~ 's;:'g ~ ~. ~ ~ ..~ ~ 9 ...., ~"g B 'a'~'
(I.) 8 " g...., :::I U) E !;j ::r:: = ~ gj 'x ..., Q a'"
E5 8 ~ ~;:; 8. ~ :@ :5 '0 :f.Ef~ ~;:; < ~:i1~
, -. ,
"i
C'I
~
~
:>:.
t':I
,~
....
C1
'"'
~
....
=
'(I.)
u
,(J
:s;:, .
U
'10
, 1.0
';".'')' }\.O
" .~~
"i):~"
:s
:~"
u."
0;;:1
(J
'.=
',:::I,
o
U
,~
:::r::
c
u
.: 0'
(j), ......
co......
C' 0'\ M
t':I oo:r u.,
P: 0 '" ~
.....:::1 0
.~ ~d t:
u..... a .Q)
,w ~ a.i Qj
t~~I]
.... lri ~ CIS
. ,~tO 0 0'\
<.Q'_~' ,'1 t'--
-,c.;i&j; . ~Q, ~
,'" ,'~ @!J .
$..;::,:aj IQ), ~,
.~""'.q;,:=,.~ ''<I"'
'c"::: 's;:..::: .......
CIS .... ~ U to
~ tI)' tI) \0
;~I~liO : '8. ...,
';::"'~: P:;''''; c
CIS ...oaj t':I (I.)
':~'.", .~:a' S
~(I.),,",,,,O. Q
]~o-.s 0'
;';\/jiJ .~. ]
o:J ,"', u , .~
, ~ ~<E ~ !3
asuo E
,::S :d:5 c;i a
~~~~ 8.
c-,
CJ'\
c-,
,...,
00
N
.......C'i
'"'
('j)
....
=
('j)
u
~.~
uu
-
.;:
0..
~
2:j ""
~ N'~
:5~
.~
.......
.... = Qj
.;.z 0 .... 0 OJ .;.z ... i,j
= Q; = a t':I ... biJ = = biJ (OJ =
t':I '" .9 'oJ)Q.. ""' .9 (I.) ""' c.. .9
.::! 0 J,.j Q,) ... 0 c: .::! 8 0 c: 0 :Q
.... ~.... ~ 'C ... ~ 'C ... ....,
.... ~ t':I Q) :a :c s :: :I)
~ lot (J o '" '" .5 <': ~ <': .... ;- ~
0 c.. ? ~ ."" c: !:! ~ " ::: 0 ~ 0 ;
"- ...
T RAN S M
T TAL
~C\~ S ~
p~ NZ.;~~:\"_
~~~~~~~
D 1Jl@[]O~&
i iliJAR 2 4 1998 ~
~ "
""- ----
ELLERBE BECKET
"
March 20,1998
TO: Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
c: Don Eyberg, Kim Way
VIA: Facsimile 612-490-2276
FROM: Bryan D. Carlson, ASLA
Senior Vice President, Design Principal Planning and Landscape Architecture
800 LaSalle Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Tel: 612-376-2447 Fax: 612-376-2552
E-mail: Bryan_Carlson@ellerbebecket.com
PROJECT: Roseville City Center
SUBJECT: Skating Center Expansion Evaluation
QTY
WE ARE SENDING: 1
DATE
3/2098
DESCRIPTION
Letter of Assessment of Phase 2 Skating Center
Expansion and Renovation
REMARKS: Steve, I hope this will appropriately respond to your needs and those of the City
Council. If you notice any obvious discrepancies from our discussions, please call
me. I will try to address them and modify my letter to clarify our position. I will be
in the office the rest of today as well as all day Monday.
SIGNED:
f}vq
.11
'),
ELLERBE BECKET
~
March 20,1998
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Re:
Subject:
Roseville City Center
Skating Center Expansion Evaluation
Dear Mr. Sarkozy:
We are very excited about the vision you and the City staff have presented for a new City
Center in Roseville. This concept is a wonderful opportunity for the City to further it's
goal of becoming a truly livable city. We are excited to be apart of it and feel that the
Phase 2 Skating Center expansion we be a supporting contribution toward that goal.
Ellerbe Becket is pleased to offer this assessment of the proposed Phase 2 Skating Center
expansion and renovation project with respect to its potential impact on the future
development of a Skating Entertainment and Event Center and the longer term vision for
the City Center development.
The Ellerbe Becket team has:
. Visually surveyed the existing site and facilities.
. Reviewed current plans for the expansion and renovation of the existing Skating
Center.
. Met with the project architect, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, regarding
the current Phase 2 expansion and future expansion concepts for the Skating Center.
. Met with City staff members to discuss current Phase 2 plans for the Skating Center
expansion and their longer term vision for the City Center development.
Summary Assessment
The current Phase 2 proposal expanding north and west from the existing ice arena does
not appear to preclude or negatively impact the future expansion of the Skating Center or
long term development of the City Center concept. This expansion provides for the
immediate and, as we understand, critical program needs for; multipurpose community
space for banquets, organized City functions, community clubs and indoor spill over space
from the ice arena and oval, as well as team, fitness and miscellaneous utility space for the
Skating Center.
Phase 3 and subsequent phases of expansion of the Skating Center warrant further study of
the broader City Center concept before proceeding with detailed development plans and
construction. This includes the Skating Center Phase 3 expansion of community activity
spaces and offices to the north and the restaurant and pro shop development to the south.
Bryan D, Carlson,
ASLA
Senior Vice President
Design Principal
Planning and
Landscape
Architecture
800 LaSalle
Avenue
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
Telephone:
612-376-2447
Facsimile:
612,376,2552
E.mail:
Bryan _ Carlson@
ellerbebecket.com
p$
(YO
J
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
March 20,1998
Page 2
Additional future development opportunities have been proposed including an aquatic
center, ice arena, fitness center and others, all potentially with different operational
venues. These may represent great opportunities, but also have significant implications for
longer term site development that should be carefully studied.
General Feedback and Comment Summary
Site and Visitor Services
The Phase 2 layout for visibility, access, parking, circulation, orientation points, rest rooms
and food service as they relate to the site will provide improved use of the Skating Center.
Phase 3 expansion can be accommodated with careful additional planning and detailed
design. Further expansion will have significant site implications requiring long term
strategic planning.
. The existing Skating Center has two main parking areas adequately serving the
facilities. Event activities currently require exit only onto Woodhill Drive. It is not
anticipated that Phase 2 or Phase 3 expansion plans will significantly impact the
quantity of parking or vehicular circulation.
. Existing pedestrian access to the Skating Center is through a single entrance at the
northwest corner of parking lot B. Skating Center access during events utilizing lot C
is circuitous. The Phase 2 expansion will add a second entry to the Skating Center at
the southwest corner of parking lot C, improving pedestrian access during events and
general flexibility for the Skating Center and commons/community areas.
. Phase 3 expansion of the Skating Center is planned to take place at each of the two
Skating Center entries. This expansion may not immediately impact the site vehicular
access or circulation, however, the impact on the pedestrian entry areas will need to be
carefully assessed and designed. Programming or scheduling of events will remain an
important consideration.
. Future expansion beyond Phase 3 north and west of the ice arena and around the Oval
is achievable. A small addition north of the ice arena is also achievable. However,
future significant expansion such as an additional sheet of ice, an aquatic center or a
fitness center that displaces existing parking and increases parking demand will have a
major impact the entire Civic Center site, not just the Skating Center site. Also this
additional/larger recreational use must be carefully considered in the overall balance of
land use in this City Center area.
Facilities and Operations
The Phase 2 layout for spatial organization, pedestrian circulation and orientation together
with the addition needed facilities including team rooms, rest rooms, food service, etc. will
provide improved use of the Skating Center. Phase 3 expansion can be accommodated
with careful additional planning and design. We feel that all non ice related functions
should be carefully studied before Phase 3 or subsequent development is undertaken.
Expansion beyond Phase 3 has significant site implications that require long term strategic
planning by the City.
. Recreation and Sports Activities - Phase 2 circulation, adjacencies and general layout
for: locker rooms, meeting spaces and associated facilities, work well. We assume the
locker rooms and community spaces are adequately sized /configured based on your
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
March 20, 1998
Page 3
programmatic needs. Phase 3 expansion at the lower level has large activity rooms
connecting directly to the team room corridor. This may be heavily traveled, and it
may be desired, if not required, to provide a wider corridor. Service access to the Oval
physically separates the lower level, limiting expansion space.
. Community and Entertainment Activities - Phase 2 circulation, adjacencies and
general layout for: the commons, concessions, reception and gathering spaces,
banquet and meeting spaces work well. Again we assume that these areas are
adequately sized for your programmatic needs. The kitchen is adequately sized for
catering, not food preparation. If food service requires expansion, it has limited space
to the north and service access becomes a greater intrusion on the public space. As
mentioned earlier, the additional entry on the north side of the commons space is
important asset for the Skating Center.
. StaWmaintenance access and circulation. service loadinwdelivery access - Phase 2
access and service from parking lot C is mid level and through a half flight of steps,
while on grade access would be more desirable. With subsequent expansion, service
will become a more significant issue and we suggest further review of its location.
Additionally, an alternate location for the service road might be considered to allow
flexibility for a larger and better connection of the lower level facilities.
. Restaurant and Pro Shop - The Pro shop has a direct relationship to ice activities and
can enhance service and hopefully supplement revenues. The proposed restaurant
may follow suit with the pro shop, or possibly compete with Skating Center
concessions. The restaurant will require separate kitchen, service and dining space.
The site discussed for the restaurant places a significant amount of pressure on an
already tight entry to the Skating Center. Careful consideration should be given to
how this restaurant will integrate with the Skating Center operations, function and
physical facilities.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this assessment to the City. If you have any
questions or would like to further discuss these comments, please do not hesitate to call me
at any time. We look forward to continuing our relationship with the City of Roseville and
to assist the City in achieving its vision of its new City Center.
Sincerely,
c: Don Eyberg, Kim Way
C:\sarIdt3,doc
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Minnesota
CITY CENTER QUESTIONNAIRE
PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
1.
IS~MIS~ O~ ~CENTERSOf!ND?~
(l~ J:;1/:;'/v';;~/4J-- -~ <--
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FOCUS OF A CITY CENTER SHOULD BE?
~~#;~~~~J;
2.
DO WE NEED A CENTER OF IDENTITY?
"J k~i~~du,
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A SENSE OF PLACE?
'7L.D
DO WE WANT AND/OR NEED A GOVERNMENT CENTER WITRALL
SERVICES TOGETHER? _ . _
J ~ ':- d:::J 1 ~ ~ ~ttu., /~
- ~ &~p--~ ~
WHAT ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE RECREATION CENTER?
~-~~Hk~
WHAT ARE THE MEETING ROOM COMPONENTS OF A
CO~U~TYCENTER?
Q:\CITYCENr\CITY CENfER QUESTIONNAIRE.5.20.99doc.doc
.' ~..:. ' ~ce j Herron
,'~'i 1464 Clarmar Ln
':" Roseville MN 55113
v /..(~
Name \.).) f'.'.. \ \ {~ ~ '.
(In OF ROSEVlllE
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
Interest Group Questionnaire
" >." c, . OrganiZatiO~ <C' > ff"~' "', [2.0'"
"
"..-C''I I' if
Address \!-I (::> LJ ("! 0-, ( i-' ., (
............ .... '''~
Phone ,::,.;;;! . ~ ~?", \.:; "; ,
Your Roseville Property Location 14/ ~:
,
,
"" J 1....:
.'
"
Date S / ) ~ ; ~ ;,
In 1998 a city resident survey found that additional government, meeting space, and
recreation facilities were desired. The City of Roseville City Center Task Force is interested
in obtaining your perspective regarding the issues that should be included in the City Center
area, located at Lexington Avenue and County Road C. The three primary uses (or
expansions of existing uses) proposed are: a government center, a community meetings
center; and a recreation center.
1. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should be
included in the City Center: (Please list)
Ros\(.-.J:\\~ Co "".....""'-,,, ,-'I b........d.. N~,e ~r c... "'~-v-.....(\" d-~<; 'J".'\ r.'l.":.... .::~,"<.\ ?\P"'r'
h.O"",Q. f:,,,,
,-tc W"t.~K.\.....
.
bv.- >~.\ "'",\"'i' "- r ~ ;..\
2. Are there specific uses or activities that you and your organization feel should not
be included in the City Center: (Please list)
(0 IT> ,,",\)..r. "
3. Are there social or business users/customers who may have unique needs that
would be satisfied at the City Center:
What groups are these?
1.. \ W 0.......\ 0.... h ~ yo, , ( " \ ( 1:' '""', C c. r", I ,"'~ '", i i -:., (~ ",.~ ; I"I', \ ,\
" Vr:....~, - : \"( ~"rt\ Ii::.. -:1 W 0.....:.. ,'1-- '-:J r"'~ ~,,:('....\... .~"..~,~'.\ 0:: I . \ ...\ .r, .'.... u \f'..O:- ,
WIiiif"h tlMir fil'lIIIifia Rir'
-:::".u..~\ ~"t'""...~i.li/'" {'~;-'\ ~ ~ v......x l' ...... <.:: ...:....:.,.-. (...._y -.
c......... \' ~ .
"
4. If the needs of the social or business users are to be met at the City Center site
during the day or week, when would these uses or activities have to be available?
c....(\"..,.-<<1'1 \.
Commv..n;-i:'-I Bv......,\ I '1....,'I-"-rS C>..\ r...('" '1"'"I:'">f', ~v~'; T'; ,....::>..i" '\....~{\
~" b" f, ",.,,11.\.' '.. -i:~ "''''', hI."" 0.....01, "'\!",I\~(LW."1,i(.
5.
Other comments: (Feel free to provide additional comments)
.....\1.,... ~m~\"","'I--...~",-,q u::\ Ci~'......(,>\ (-'1-.,,1{ \");,./\<' (,... 9[\
c(}... ...... 'c. " '...... " " .. ,\ 0 r-, -'< \.-.. w." t 5. (~ --( r-..., c ; <.
;:,.~~ -rh.~\.?,!L~~. CO.....C..fT( "''-. '..><11 ..,'tT"'~r\..J...,.....~
~'<,h.\""'" \\......~
Wl-.......vQ maS; ~;"(OP\.:'
Q:\ CITYCENT\questionnaire_ 05. 99,doc
---
--
II
I ..
f
I >0
01
:-
CO
I c:
I 0
....
I 01
..
I Qj
0
CO
..
...
0
...
...
Qj
II
....
..
..
...
....
;C
'"
t;
101
:E
:=
'"
...
,.J
~
0
u
u
<
.c
.c
'"
....
c:>
101
I-'
:2:
j
a..
"
Z
...
Q,.J
~~
U .........
I-' :>c::
W OP-
;4 ex; c/)
"(.oJ fJ,..
"'I-' v:>
4J~{J')<
..J..J,.J
~~;:j
s8~~
v:>
oa
:::>
'"
;C
I/)
'"
c:>
,.J
101
... c:>
~ ~
,.J . >- '" '"
~ :iQ:3 ~;j8<
ti 101101 ...<c:>c:>
:::> ~ti~ ~~!::~
..: ~1oI "'O,.J
I-' c:> '" - -< <
I/)1oIC:>1O/C:> "'1>-"'1-'
:2:,.J1oI ...c:> I,.') '"
O,.JQ"':51O/ :z:~c:>:z:a..
Ut:~~ ti ;O~"':::>
m ml-'C:>:::> "'''' :z:~
..:c:> ...0": ...... m...1oI
10/3 C:>,.JI/) I-' C:>1oI<,.J
1-';:)3.... I/) I-'~,.J!:u
~ ;:)~'~ i5 :!S
:=~ I&<I,.')UI-'XI-'I-'O~
1/)01&< :2: ,.Ja..0 1&<<
OX....IoI.......,.JU I>-
UII) 81>-11):::>:::> "'1,.')
....loIm <II:::>oaO'I,.'):Z::Z:,.J
:Z:"'IoI"'UO I&I:2:U...<
uu..: "':=101 .......~..:..:,""..
....<UI-'c:>,.JI,.')>-~p..:z:~1oI ,J .
a..o<:a~,.J~j<oD~IoIj:... ::
t"'t ,..... M P::; ..J ~ en p.. Q.. ...... 0 C,;) C "'..............'
....~. ;~
(: W....
............
! 0)
l~
!Ol
; CD f
t~t
/0,
~!
c:
0
...
..
~ c: '"
C:'" ...
:> '" u
0<: .. Qj
.&J ...
I,.') Qj 0 Co
:2: :- Co
... "'1"'4 0 CtI tI]
m ... .. .....
'" ....c
c:> w ... .. :> ..
< m '" Qj ... 0
0 ~ c:> 6~ >00
'" ...
"" ... :-
Q I,.') 0 OI 0 to
:2: I-' 0<: c:
< I-' 101 c:> ..."'Ov...-1
l3 101:::> Z o c: ..
I-' c:>:z: < .... ~ ~ ::J
0 0 ~~ ..... "'.&J
,.J U m (J QJ a:I...-t
m 0< 1&1 ..... E OI ...
<.:> '" \OJ '" ~~ ...-1........-4...
:z: 0 0 1'-< o .., ~ c:
... I&. ... ,.JIL '" 0
m ~ :z: 1 ex: I-' ... u
~I c:> ~ < \OJ 0 0'" .......
,.J < 101 oa ~t; Z>- ='QJ~"O
W a.. '" ...'" 00<: ... c:
... <.:> < ~ ........ gex: ~.;,..J CO r;1
"- 0 \OJ 1-':> C.I
,.J ex: u 1&1 < ~~ ~~ '" 00 I
,.J a.. < U I'- .,.; c: .... t:..
1'1 < ~ < 101"- Q< "....
oa I,.') '" ~ <.:>' a..0 :J ex: > 0 ..
.cl :z: ::> '" :2: 0< ex: C..... 0<:
101 ... I/) ::> ... 0 0: 00'"
"'I w Q II) " j~ "- 0 ... ...
ex: 1&1 ~ Z GGJ~ :> ...
--'I i: 1&1 c:> ... ...< II) ... ... o 0
m < ex: :J "- p W ., '" >0'"
:= ~ m ex: S z c: ...
1&1 ~ WO 0 MOl
I-' 101 101 ::>"- I&. "",,"Uj "f"'f c:
\OJ :z: Q 101 Q :z: :> """ ...., ....-I >.
,.J ... ... t;( ..... ... 1&1 0 0 :> ... ...
~ I-' :> :> I-' II) >.c.oQJ~ ~AV' N01':JNIXn
:z: 0 w 0 ;z: ~ .r::......~C
0 0 '" ex: ex: 0 << 0(. ~ ~ ='
U U "" U Co. U " .. 0 ~
--..---------
-+-'
U
. .... ~
.]:j
m
. ....
""d
a.>~
m;;:::
::s >
""d a.>
fd C5
-~
~ -+-,"
a.> .~
~ I-<
~1;)
. ....
~O
Q)
I-<
U
o
-+-'
VICTORIA ST
I
,/
a..
t~fi
. ~ ~ ~
t:~.s
1::Q.:2
~ -'
I-<
Q)
E
a.>
U
@~
- . ....
~U
Q) Q)
. ~ .l::
m -+-'
~4-I'l
~ 0 ~:]
~ ~ I
o..""d
S ~ T CHURCHILL ST
8] n;:g """
Q) I!I![!l!J:E :E :E
.l:: ~ LEXlNG ON A VE N
-+-' ~
~ ____' I Rosevi/IeRte
.s ""d c: ID I ~,,~nlH ,~~
-+-' ~ ~ ~ m Ii~k -...... O:t:~
5 - H ~ I ~j--I~Q: I
S ~ I!: o:r: a:::: ~ i~ U I
""d -:;:: :I: it:: ~ 1
~ ~ ~I i~\ \
~ m ~ \~~
fa ~ ~ ~ ~'1
c: .!!"'.. U
~ 1;) I ~~
1 ! 1mB ffiffiHm I &'~ u~ j
cr'..... EEEEffij
Q) I-<
1-<1;)
~ Q . ~
I-<
a.>
E
~ ~ DELLWOODST' DO S . -_I~~ '" - . 8.
.€ 81ffiHEB tEIE HURONS' i
U I iTTlTTl ! l
, i I ! :' ;
..,,'
~
.....
--
!:::
~
V
a::::
:I:
: I
, "I
, :I:i 0::
~:x:
'''I
j:I:
I I
" ! " 1'-----'1 I'
:I:I:I: "I
: I:I: !,
o
Q
~
a:
t
~
o
o
~
o:t
I-
f3
5
:.:
~
o
~
q~
, a:,
o
-------
-
.
,"
=>
=>
:5
<n
~I
.!!
~i
"-
<;
. '
2'1
"I
I
,
. '"
<Iz "N
'-'
-,;
'-'
'ZJ
c::
to
.. a:
o en
... 41 c::
:u .~ 0
.... en '';:;
41 c:: to
'- 41 c::
en .c 01
Q) 41 'iij
.Q'-4I
to C. 'C
..J E
o
u
~
-.J
Q)
....
cu
'"
Q;
(J
....
~l
Q:; i
J::
Q
~
r
-
..
W
-
f"'tI#
~-
:c~
E--
Q
~Coj
~Z
~-
<~
Q~
Z.J
~Q.,
OQ:::
=~
~E-
:cZ
E-~
~U
Q>
.....E-
00._
~U
<Q
~~
=:rfJ
<~
o
=
Q.
----- ----
~
~
II)
~
t:::
OJ
=
-11"'1
.....
~
~
~
5-4
~
.....
=
~
u
~
.....
-11"'1
U
July 12, 1999
Minneso'" &al Ert4lejouT1IIJI
Page 5
~
The city of
Maple Grove
will soon
shape up
NORTHWEST PLANS
NEW FITNESS CLUB
The city of Maple Grove is about to '
get its first health club, .' ,
Last month, the city apl'{oved North.
west Rae uet Swim and ealth <..:lub s
aus to deve 0 a two- e . , .
~are oat aCI 1~1 at WI e a ac cd
to the CltV.S 111:\ ( SQuare toot commu-
..11.i.1Y center. located east of the Weaycr
LakeToadllnterstate 94 interChange,
The club, which will be Northwest's
II th Twin cities location. will operate as
i IS own entity but share some amenities
with the community center.
"Maple Grove is a tremendous mar-
ket:' says Jerry Noyce. Northwest.s
regional manager. adding that he expects
the new club to draw members from
throughout Maple Grove as well as
neighboring suburbs, including Cham,
plin and Plymouth,
The city plans to sell Northwest about
5,5 acres of land for the development.
Club owners also will have an option on
an additional three acres for future
expansion, says AI Madsen, Maple
Grove ciry administrator. Neither North-
west nor city officials will disclose a
potential sale price for the land,
" They're in the final
stages of financing and
they're out fOr pricing
with contractors. "
-Terry Just
director of parh and recreaJion
city of Mapk Grove
Noyce says a cost estimate for the club.
is not yet available as Northwest is still
running the numbers. Northwest is work-
ing with lender J,P, Morgan,
"They're in the final stages of financ-
ing and th~y're out for pricing with con-
tractors," says Terry Just, Maple Grove
director of parks and recreation,
Typically, Northwest clubs average
about 150,000 square feet ahd feature full,
service exercise equipment. swimming
pools and sports facilities. However, the
Maple Grove club will be significantly
smaller and will not contain tennis/racquet,
ball courts or an indoor pool. The club will
share the community center's indoor pool,
while the Northwest facility will feature an
outdoor pool that will be available to users
of the conununity center.
"TIllS will be a new design," Noyce says,
adding that plans call for a full fitness cen,
ter with an indoor running track and aero-
bic studio, a pro shop. snack bac and
locker rooms with full.length lockers.
The outdoor pool is scheduled to open
in June 2000 and the club is expected to
REPORTS
open in September 2000,
Plans for the Northwest facility in Maple
Grove were first discussed in 1996, but the
club was unable to line up the financing
(MREI, 9.16-96), At that time, the propos'
al called for a 170,000 to 180,000 square
foot facility to be developed on 15 acres,
which would have been the chain's largest
club,
The club owners at the time. Harvey
Ratner and Marvin Wolfenson, were frus,
trated that their lenders would not advance
new money for expansion. They ended up
Selling the chain of clubs in March 1997 to
Denver.based Club Sports International,
which also owns Aagsh!p Athletic Club in
"Mapk Grove is a
tremendous market. "
-Jerry Noyce
regional manager
Norlhwest RacqUl!t Swim
and Health Club
Eden Prairie,
As for future expansion, Noyce says
there is nothing definite, but "we're look.
ing at possibly expanding in the Twin
Cities market." He will not disclose possi,
ble locations,
In 1996, the club also had plans to devel,
op a facility in Oakdale, but once again the
lack of financing put a halt to that project.
Noyce says OakdaIe is still a possibility,
but he wilJ not comment further, .u, lVolf
.. ;,"~~_,~"ihiiM~"'~___ _., J'
- ---~--._._~~.__.._~..._~-~-~'-'--"'_._---'--' ~-_._--~----_._..,._-- -'-'---"~_.-'-- -- ---_....-
. . . ~-~ . /'. ~ A.:;~~.~*-~~~~~~~~~~.~:~~E~~~:~;;t:::::~=:;~~~;~:~~~~~~~~~:~~~~:(':~:~!~t1.!~~:i~~~.~~:~\:'.
.........;.".;..
, ..
.
,
.,
~..
.,
~ ~
j~
,
9~
~.
~
ii',
it,
~
~
~"
~
~.
~'
iJ"
)1 II
eP
:~
,
~,
I
~,
~
~
~
.,
.
.
/
. - .-.- -. - ---.
\ 3: ~t,-~-""~ :.~.. --.~_ ' : "" "'. .'..'----.~~>.",:"'.'-ii'. :-~--.'.:'......, ,"\'<' ~:"-'"
.,. ~" _____,.~r----, ~.-!"-..... ' ", ---_ L__~. '....J ',-_:'-'..V--' -. '_! -...-.... " ','
i ~(J~~~~~~~~~~~';
, __._.L~_.,_~__~_:.._......_...:....~~~~._'....I~..'-.. IS.' " i
;
I
'--"--
/ ~
<-...." ~
') ~
./",
c' .,--
" i s-d ~ ~ \ k-" " L\
~ ~...r. - .---... --...~...!
\ ~~_........../ -,-...:"
\.' --.-..... - .....,.......--~-
,,\ ~ .,~\ \ ., ~ \
~.,' .. I>;h~)\>>-::5;;:=-=-=-~=c,=- ~---,.~ ,...-./
~ j j /~~>I:/"/~~--
JI i, :! i /I't//./ l l \ '-/ '>"'"
, '(' /".' " 'r "0" '\
, \' I' /1,11/1/ /< \' " '" .L \
. ! 1 \ /11f-i./ /' """\ . b l
, \ '\ i,(i,'h f , ',' I i
. - { j' 'I ,.. - I \
~"\\"i\'\',~~ "l)
. \, \ \\\ ) \. "'\. .: ii
:lt~>~'~~\ ,,\ -. .. l'
~::,~-....;: ~..b.-~' I . -.-,-.---.-,~{2~!
.... -, .':''-...::--,'~.....:~ ~:::-:::- '----.L-j , ',/. ;~
8---- '. ~~ -" " = - -,-J--------.,------ --
.. ;:t.~:~~...,.----..."! ""-~~ ---.~~--,~------~-....,------.!.-........;--::-~ ....;-~~-
r ....~.. '. ^"........ ..... S::::::. '---..., " '~-~ --'- '-'- ~)x::-~
~~~1;~- ~~:~:-.-~;~~:~~~~;:.
. I
---~---- -
~
8
8
~
iJ
8
~
~
i
t9
6
~
~
~
8
81.
8
IJ
~
~
I
~.
8
~
~
8
~'
~
, ;
.
.
.
"'~
"
. __ ''!T.<;~"~:1''~''
~...c,.i. ~.., '~"'",
~. ....... V'.~ '.--"
(.
Ie
a
c:
o
........
4->
ge
if)
='
--
--
~
, ,\ .
I---
i Q;)
i
I
I 'Q;)
. I
I Q;)
I
!
Q;)Q;) Q;)
Q;)
Q;) Q;)Q;)
I Q;)Q;) 000000000 Q;J Q;J0 00~0
I
100 00
I 0 0
0 0
0 Q;)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
. 0- 0
0 0
0 t 0
0 ~-- \ ! 0
0
"'I 0
0 0
--,0 . Q-,_J 0
~~- 0
I....~ ~
0
I 0 0
0
L~
Q;J f-4
Q;J
Z
0 0
@ Q ~~
0 0 ~<
~ ~ ~
Q ~ z2~ 0 .\
i=u o~~O),~UO~A; (/)
. Q 0 "
~ UUh~U~~~~ fJ
0 0
0 ~ o~uz"uA;I:8u~~
,,- ..: N ... ...
-_. ~ . - ., "-.- _. ~-~._-_. - -. .- --- - .- ,- --- -" -- --~. -"--'-" - ~." .
--_._~----- - --~--- --,- --
.. .- -- - .
-..----- --- - -
o
o
Q
GG ~
G GGGGGGGGGGG GGGGG'{G~
~ . ~G-~.,
Db
/-----1;
,-.f.' I -18
\ '
....... ~, ~ :
I ____,.._, ~~, 1
L--- _., ,.,,~ ~
I r---:o iL..J
'-J!' j
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q~
Q~
~
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
o
~
~
o
~
o
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
10
I
I~~
I ~
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
0,
~
~
~
~.
~",'"
Q
o
Q li:I,:,:IIIIII,1111 ~-~
o III!I!IIIII 1Ji=-
Li!II.'II!11 II :3 I
~ -: ;II':il':!!n~:::I
11I11 I1111 !~ II I
-' Q , ~IIClill!F ~ I I
-- II" l
..'-0 " ",/ :'~.-' ~~
o
~
o
~
Q
0~
~~
~ II
~
~
_A ___ _ _ _______
I ;
I '
1 I
I '
\ I
",~
i
I
J
l
a
~ Z I- ~
o~ 0 1E8~~go!!
e t;;~~ ~I~~ ~~~~~
~ ~8~ ~L~~ !o~~~
_.- - - "-_. -~- ~.-~.---- - -- ._.
.--- . '. --. -.
II. ' ~ ,
~
Z
c:
~1
!"'~
~
en
~
.
J ... 1.-j,.-~--"-----'-- --- ~_..------ - - ---
;
0 0
. Q '0
Q 0
: 00 <i;)(i:;)0 0 2 0
~0
0
I 0~ 000000000 0 0 00
I'
00 00
0 l? 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0' 0
I ~ ~
0 0
I 0 0
. 0"
e 0
I 0 II! ~~ 0
0 0
0 0
0 :; i il
0
0 I ,j !::
1:1 0
F~ 0
! ! i j : t ~ : ; ! ' 0
I ..
I ' 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Q 0 :>
. 0 0 Z
~- 0
I 0 0 t!
, a'
4. '
0 0 ~
-lido.. ~~
I 0 o~~~~~ 0
. I (f::J
0 ........
ti~r"\i 0 ~
I 0 mz ~Z&J
o 8 u~~~ 0
0 z..:
- - _... __,_0__..__._____. ..~._______~___~_._,~_.._._._.__.._
.' .. '--.. .
~_______ - ... .__u_ _
!---
i ~
i 'iOJ
I 0
I ~ Q
I ~~ ~~~~~~<S)(;b)~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~
I~-.
I 0
[ 0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(5
~~ I&. z
IF=~ o~o
~ ~i~5hi
. . _. _. --. -.- .-... - ~ .. ..
- - -_.-..-
.
4. (~I ,
~
z
Q
r~
~...~
~
r-'04
en
""""'
tj
.
j ...:--;._------,. -.---,. - .
Q
o
Q
00 ~
,"00 00000000000 000000€J
,..... -
I~'~
~"
~,
~
~.,'
~
~
~
~'
~
~
~,
0-
(i;)
~
~
0'
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
L~
I
I ~
I ~
~
~
~
~
e:
I
el
e
~
'~
~
~
~
~~
0~
~
~
~
o
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
~
o
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
~
~
o
L
..J
~ '<~..J
II. z~~~~~
~~:JZQQ~Q
. ~z~:Jz~~~
~ o~~E~~~~~
Z ~J:~~u~...~o
..- .-~.- - "..-- -'.~'-
x
z
o
r-'
t~'~
.<
!Xi
~
~
~
r---------~- -.--
I
._ __ _ _ _ _ _. _ d_
I--
i
i
I
I
I ~ ~
i ~
~~
1~6) 0~~~~~~~~~~ ~~0~~~
..,.. --- ,.. '~
~0
~.. n
~ ~ '
o ~...
o
o
~
~
'~
G>
'0,.
~' ,
~'
o
~,
'0
o
o
o
.~
o
~
o
,~
o
o
o
~
o
I 0
.
~, .~, ",~ I
:~ ~~~~"', I
k .~' f
t, ~\. , I
'-, .'~ _f' '--.:, I
~S:~~~~<<: 'I::: >,.' "-: " :
~';<~"."", '<:' , " ,r------'
~,''&'~ 1'- ,'- ',' I!
!:'-<:-:::-;"""<':"i '" , I
~~~~~~~,~~~':,~~ __ :.~ '. . I
~~:~:' r~- ....;.~.. --" Ii:
, ' t!.
.
,
~-
~_--, J ~
t, I
\;
I
>-
z >- 0(
~u ~~~~~~~u
~~ ~ ~! II: ~ zi a; ~ ~
o ~u.~o~~iOv~fi)o
Z O:>UZ"IL Zl:U
..: rI ...
o
'0
o
o
~
00
~0
~
~
o
~
o
o
o
~
I~
o
~
o
o
~
~
~
o
o
~
o
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
---.. - . -~- - .- -- - -- -
.
. .. ~
~
Z
c:
I-~
f..,..
., .
.:et.....
....'
~
en
i-J
g
4
, .. . ',---.--------..--.....'- - ,.. ,..
,
f----
i Q
i
I
I 'Q
.' I
I Q Q
I
i
: . GGGG(i;)G~ Q,
QQ
Q
'QQ QQ
I~Q. QQQQQQQQQQ
; I '" ' ''5:
1Q0 QQ
I Q Q
Q Q
Q 0
Q' 0
Q 0
Q Q
Q Q
Q' II Q
0 0
Q Q
Q- 0
. Q'
I Q
Q
Q
I Q Q
Q ~--
I , 0
Q' Q
Q Q
,Q rL-,-J Q
b~-, ~ Q
10 Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q Q t--1
Q Q z
c'
Q ,.'
Q ~<4
f~~
Q Q ....~
. .......
Q o~ o50~ Q ~
. Q (/)
';:) ol"-~ Q ::>
~t;I:~~~aII
Q o~~w8~~~ Q @
Q z UU ::J U
..: N
. . .-- .~ .
- - ---.....--..
-~------
~- . - .
. . ----~
(;)
o
~ ' Q
00 ~
~fi)00000000000 0000~~0~
~.~. ,
,~, ~,::,':,~~J~I:>II
'_ -'. ~~~'~~':~>'.: '1 =
tC\,. I ":"".' ',' I &: ,':
\C)I ~, .:- .....--- ~
~~:~~ !;gl
C\ I..... I I
\()I ~~~~~J ~~,
0- :~ ,'_
, ~, --,
~~,
~
~.
'~
~
~,-,
~.,
~'
~
, '.~
--~
,~
"'~
-,'(@
,'~
, '~
'~
~
.~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ - .. .- .. -.-- ..-..- ._- ... -. .....-.. ---
I
II
!;
t
,
I
tI
crt., J~
z
~~~~ ...~
It; 0 ~
::>. Z
~ ~:J~t;u-
i= II:Qii!zij9
~ ~o~~~~i
- ....
o
o
~
o
~
~0
~~
~
o
o
o
o
~
o
~
~
o
o
I 0
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
o
.
,- .. -'.-, '.
<
<
Z
o
~i
t.~
.<
~
en
~
~
'- --,----
.__. - - -. _..~ .....-. -- -- - .-..------...-. --.
"
..(.,.,,~ .- ------- --- - - -
-- --
.
'<Y
Q
.! Q
Q
Q'Q Q
Q
I(i;)~ QQ QQ (is) Q (~;)(iy Q Q Q QQQQ~~Q QQ
Q~ QQ
Q. I - Q
Q~ - I - Q
-.. -,
_. --
~ 0 ~
Q 3; ::, Q
~ ~ao~ ~:H Q
Q Q
QQ Q
Q Q
~' Q
Q Q
Q Q
i Q Q
.~ 0 Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q ~-- Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q C J Q
-- Q
.. 'Q ~
~ . L:-, l Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q ~
Q Q ~
Q Q Z
0
Q Q ~i
t~'"
Q Q .<
Q II. ri
~~B~~ Q
. V)
Q Q ~
Q gj~Z~~~ 5
I-oi~or: Q
Q OUII..uu
Z ..: rI
-.-.------------ .------- --.----
o
Q
Q
. : - ~
~0
iQQ QQQQQQQQQQQ QQQQQQ
I
100
I 0,
o
o
~'
o
0~
o
o
o
o
~
~.,
o
~
~'
~
o
~
'~'0
'~
~
o
o
~
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
o
~
o
~
00
~~
Q
~
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
o
~
o
o
Q
Q
o
; , I . !'i"
-'
..- ~ tf CJ In
~9~ .J zO
~~o:g o8~~i~ 8~5
~i!U unun;~
-...I ...
"
, 1
~-
U
Z
o
~;
t'~
.<
fj
en
~
~
\
\
\
\
I
j
e,~,-,L...-,........,,~_ ,."",<Oi~
Ros~~jli~~~i.Jt~j;"I.::~~t{e~{~~~j;p~inge','a t."
", 'c', ,',' ,','.., ,'.. ..,..:"J',",'....".." :;-.:;:,'..i-.,(,:->'..~ ":"'j";.",,;,,.-_ "",,-::;, "~I
. P ". .... .'jdd.t..t'; t'iQ;i;;7:"n;PO;'dQIYGeO\~;t)"w~'-r,eaibY'~~[f' -=.dmglo . i
,'-'. -;.-.,' :;":;t.
· 0 . The "">p.'e~'d."\i''1t)t,\j,\!j,d' ,. T'q~,:JIK."'Y . '7"'",,'lh"' ..~~d f~i! a. ...pmu"ily.~eote.t; o.
'''''Oa'loo ~od,~Y.~'J(ii).e.'!~9i!!l ,. oe'.a,J!i!'.r,~r 0 ..et!.~",ea~.withi o:.'M.ci!Y'Ao?'~', idea,.~a~ a ..
' cify, mainly,~long,..~o,:Q,n,tY;R~a. ,..an~ Lexmgto :'::"'pafli'\Vay;,sYsfein:!~"'~onne~t:a!lthep~'rksand city
Avenue. 'R~co.ritmen~~tj~)f1s_Jro.m, w.~:..t~~~, f,?rc~ ,a!~q>: ~..,~etiii2esJvithiri Rp~~yil'e."::;:;../,>, ',\// ;;,;.'. ,-'-.
',called for .th~ ~af~1l J? ..b,~'~~~'it\?,~!i~,~9l~~r r~~~~,,~.i1~;ieat:: i ,',: .. " u~i:~~~~!t"':< '~rti~O,Te!,f_t~~ iIL1'99,2: -l!pon",t.he
zones and hml((f~ r~!all S~rvIC~S.; Y:i ,3t~;g~, 'J,:,8:r;1;,'t en'dilt' " .. _,;th..e>;,M!sta,...?OQq;,s!~dy,
' .' Origin,a!iYd~:~,J,p,i?,k..?.~~~;~r~ :~~,~i~~~~~h~f:f~&;~V1n~j~):~~ ", .. ' /p}~h,~as:amen..ded-;in~1994
Coun..ty ,Road C! ~oodh~V; 9.~I';~!..' ~.,~na Street and ,to'''b'e8r:slaYi,ng~tlfe<,gt9.~Q.~~wpr~JO(~~.th proJects,
' th~. W(fst~I]1:edge 9!},JiQ~~r~il,o~nson Park. The'area ,'.Wel~,c . i~"UPJle~,:p'apf.~_ays, w6rK~,b'egal1.shQrtJ~
,also"irichided Vete~a'ns}~ark,'.aJ1.:<f, the' V,FW .CI~b to .t.~~..: {:there rid~c9nr 'lies g~'d~y::," . . '. '. '
nortJi\ of,WoodhHL:.Qr(ye,.:.liJ!.Ii1geRos~vIl1e', ,.' "" ept:i ;.""as!~iibt;'ii14~h~adjon':01})hecity
.Hoi\(e'~~ifi>!~ "fi?~'(,llf~9f~~~"i!:j;~~.~$i~"i . . :\ Q,} ",?ii:Tj)~i.r~J"'~di>mie!ei>~o,ne
,over 121'acres. wer~"Qclu,d_e..d, In-the;i,RI~ oca1f:t~sidehts/was1'conducted, and a CIty
D.i".,.,,) ,; i'E~iii!t;t:r' .' "i','~~,,, 9~~~, ;..(i€<f;~~:~'R!#!,iifi'~id~otS 'Uryeye~
How~v,e!, o","'~u',,,"'."pla,"ts .JroOl area..." ",";':14!~i'!M~!t.e'i["'W~ .u"~ol:9'!y;S&~~cr;I' appoml~da .
at both .,the' Eos,eYI!Ie,?P{a~n!ng~~mml~slOn meetl,,;,; .- '~;:t3:m'emt1e~:tasJ(:~force.;tQ ..,b~gireplf\n.Jii.9g !he ,~~~;\.;Jhal'
i~~~}i!j~'i~!mv~~f.[~~~ijt~~'E1i~~t~~~~i!~l~~~hS
..),
."h...
; ~
v
-----
I~"""'''-
...;~
-~h---'-,.' -F"" '.";'
Goose, rom.'
~';;~~)V:a,1 ~,o:~,~/:- : ,
;~travet Qil,es\::
,:t~~~?~\)~;:;:: :'r:~'\~f:/hfA~j:/'; ~
t~., '''/~'':')' ",:..~,:,;'t.> ::.'.... .' /!:.(.:,j?:..,..,"".'. ,,\),>,.,};:;, :.~<...i;l;,:..J}/~.:.',;'~.:::,',.:i ',~
a'S' . ';:-< .'0' "..~'~;;.m.: ,.; "..", ", .,: "D6
.', '.. 'J,: ," ,.~~-,~.~!:,.',:~ ~ \t'-S': if, ;- > .~
\~Oi;hl~~~~ih~,~:~i:4,~i4~J~~t~t~:9tr , ' ,.~;i:;:f~>:::::
j '''The'ta~kforc:e'wilfgiyen ihe;.c~irg~\9f:Qe.firii~g..t
Idiy c:enter"'~oncepfi: i~~nt1(yin'g::tJi,~:tornffi'U'nHy;'sne~d.
I'.,... ..~}.,"_',:. H ,.l-c~.;J.>.Fi,j..,~:. _;.."._,i'.1~.Jf~~<l^';rr."',. _.....:,1'...'.,
land locatiitg..the,~bou ndariesfforAhejdisifipt;~!::Wiete~k'
, _:. ".." <'" :'_'" "..' .; .,_j ',1"1 :.; ,';" .' ; ;"':", ", f','"/~-:,,,;,,~ . .<,.' . . I,:', ,:._;'\\-:...._1-~'>,>~r.:. }{, f:.... ,~:', ',;,:,-:,?' .'<
:said:',,~'.~):':,~'nlel)~,ij1gJt.h~i~Bomp.r~h~p~j,y~;{'R!~.Qk~!F' . ,,' ,
:~~~~:~;:!sj{t:~J~~:sfl~~~%;:~~~~ft"".:t'.}ffN~thiO
'wi 11:chang~'. u'l1ii !.:a: prgR~~~I; ~oiri~s';bef6~e;ti1~ :,c~urici,
:. .. ''':':~/' :,,_ \.~,:~~~., -:.".;..:.~,:..:..~.._,..,,"..._.~:~'_;~,';.~..,,~;.."'.,-";).,/.' .;:t::-:. ~,
,and action i~take~'to:iriitlatet.h~fi::Ii~~ge.?!::;,~::"i,." ..:;
:cr~~~:.~~~J~Kfrr9~~~!~~~!M,~;iM,~:~:~~!:.;it&ir,., .-(;,
prov.ldec?mmll n!ty~a,th~rmgsp~cey r~creatloJ]~,!,;a.r~~,~~" (f),
andgovernmentservlces. ' ! . . "',"', " "':':~ ' "''':'...
, "On~,: ~hing, ~~.~~.!i.f}~~,:~?'.~he Y,sii,~gp,9~t\1dr'*~))~~: :~{:'::,."
tha,t the'CdY's,;,s.e,rvlces'~r~,scaH,~re(J.aro.u.nd:.R()se~11,!~,:~' ; > ,:,.1', ",,";:;n;~.'::
Wieteckisaid:,''''rhi$> ,'ds'ahwpul ; "'<:'tri~m~iil :)'4,
'~~~~~~{~w~~jI!{~,;J~1lf:L~~~:~~t~~: ;. ;~'"
propertY,itn Ahe 'Plty:;to.!'retall;<Thls :dlstncf.''Yo\11d '11.0,
allo~' for, large,r~ia1 "'or ijhd:us~'ri:il d~v~toP!l1<int"i6,t~;
,.','f...-~:., ._,,, ...., -t f'(- .1.,...>.,:",.~".,...,(." ,..;t,,..., -.~"" /'._.J:,.....,~.".
~i~a.:,~t,.w~uld,; ,a~tit~I!y!Jp.tQ!~CC~~~jii,ff9!'Ii;(!at'ge;,~cal
t~f~~~~~~~f!j~!~~yl~!1~
paI:k;: l'1do9~, ~WI!11 m.."g;~PQQI ;;ba!!,~~!ba.llI.:f~Hey1?a.lJ
~;:~~~~;&.if~;~: .
"'"",,'J" .',.,. ,', ,
':'9.9.6IMe&q~';,Qrand~:Ma~uis'G!
)-/:,,'\i~~;--:.,-:<t~,[; " _ . '..... :., '.';c, " .. 1
;~~ . '$ll~lA~~,;~~~;~'~~'}
.",,' """'''''''1i91'GMC~' m" nt, ~"4x' 4 '4D V6 f
'--,:,: .,~. .",,;'.~:'t, ;'\V- ,-"'1. ' ? '. ,.... /"
';'~~"jj:2~~~fJ(;Z[!('~0"'~'~~f''f".::..,J::, ;,>. J ,::,f;r: ' ,- .
.,~".,;":;,'"".'."Ci. ',',i'.~W~....1;..{~,;.::.':~;~.'.'i;f.~:'~9,'9,..8" ','..~.,...M.., C',. :Sa"v'a"n' n' ,a"C.arg'Q'V an
;:;:;cc; ~..:1'1{~;~'F.;f;1;,~,.:}':',;<t, ,"'1., ','," '.'." ' I
"::~':~t;.~!;;~:;~~i,'\i(("'~\i;:~~'/'['.:9;" "9"'8' ,/g~'ey:t;ro':' "e' ':5' .'0' 'EX"",:' C' a' ", At
;r2~, r?:~:;}<)::~w,~!~E;,}';~\;:::;ici~!':'f'i .,1~!J .~">, r" .jI;.~' ., I".~,,!t,
., ..';::' v,,'/",',;t,<, . ,:{., , ,,:,.;.' ftftft'ftljlA..."ldIA:1 IA~A:n~ 'IAi
\
,,; " .' ,: J;t;i::, .. i~'<i:~~;1('; '5~f:'~';V(f;;&2HJ ;';i~~;7f;" P',,:1
The ~I~ ,Cente'r;task~ I7,QrCeorlglrially,'proposed ;fnclud'lng ovef.121" acr~s ;o,:'iana'l nto' a brand r
. the develop'ment1it(the:ar~ii;:70ri'M'ay' 2"();'the':bbundarlesw~r~' redrawn to'i~kti' o'ut'the: Rosevllli
,':;~:.~~~rl~!~r!\~~~i;'~iiI1}~~iltf~~ji;1!~:;:4;~~1
,P e,~~s t;P~W,~I1,~;~y~,h.w".ei1.~(W~,S,~Jt,o" t,~,(:,{~,~,~~;X;~A;<1S~~I,l}g4or! ~,Q~pg~~:J9/:t~,~,'S1tYJ,S,~'<;;9IJ1prehensl ve j
, ,'Yiet(:~kr;~aid:>~~~e\al~.~ar1t~J~~~ito.~~fMr{th~~~i;p! ~ii::;:;y,?:u:ye, ,adirritt ed.:yoti ,tare:nowhere: ? ear'!
f,~.~d,~~~t,:::~,,~;~,~~~;~~'~jf~r"f;~.*~\.~t7r.h~':~i~:<,;,:;~~;#~:~,h Y~'~~~;6:l.:p~~;e.~~~~ti/:~h:~~tel~ \
, " ',r.~~:~~til'~;:?~i~n:h~~~'~:',[:,,';f?>f},i~/}"~:;:? ',:;;i5;,~;::;\'ai:,:~:~,,~y~y~~~Jb;;Qo:~6,T~J~?"~f. ;,[~e:t~I,",~ ' that may,
,,:, ',';, ;ResidentS;,rea:cftoplaii~~!.";;;h';-.';:iJ:,'~i;,:"-, Wietec:ki iiesponded'th!it: :the'task~ Jorce",'as
': ,,:;:':r.~~p~; IS :somet~ln~Y9~!~U; n~~~"t();:k,~ep,:~n:;'..'1 ~rge'!~~~l~f~';~ e,af;tng /r,qm, ~pe9 11.1;;! nt (frest.-
'W)?,~;J\()~~V.,ne:;~x!~9gs',~q';~I! ,th~' ~eo~I~!'r:,'~ar,d,}~~,~ro.~p~ "I}~~~"~~:~~~~,,t~~ t~~~, f9I~e ~Jso, ha,s ,h~ard
, r.~~t4~~9:pl?~ :-I~q~~~':t~~~~y'e;J~RPP.~~~i~h.~~~~)'ij,t,~~M>i;! h, t:.Il~~?~~<o,~,:,~,~,t:') f,~,~>>-'gB~5r~I1),~p;t ' pJf l ~e~,
",~!tY?':9d; t~,t?~~<r.qH~S,I;:h~,!);:sl?~qt;~m()!I~Y;i~l!h()~b);;',11 c!p d.lpg;:tb~; i"PpJlS ~,;:d ~ p~rt!11 ~,l1h a n ~ ,f 1 r~;
.i!:RP'r.o;v,~~~a~fI ;te!e~en~u~,~a9;d :it~Joo~s;I\~e~~'e~i-e:,;,;:~ep~r~fTlt:ftJ" ,b<3!~:o(~,~i~n,"f,1ee~ ;m~!~ ,space a~ '
going' "()~q,t!iat',d!re,c~,ton:ag~inf. Ti: "I,;j;~, ';:i/ ,.,.:: t_~~jr..~~,rv,ice,~,;~wa;?,~,)r ,~~'e: <:ofI1~u,nity, T6e"1
, :i1';;' t~i~,;:n?,~/ M~~,ris~, :p.l,~~:n~~?~: ~uJ",~h,~,~: ~t~~: i!1 i!.. ~ar:k, ~W~ '~~C,~~,~\i!J.n::pep'~~,I1J~nt a]so i,s.l?oking :
RJ.~f~'lt ~h9uJd.: ef~r~'thelp.9.QI%i~Qr:;a>yqte'7<.' fO,rL~:,ne?N; '~J~I1l~"b,,~<::a~~~.;of:p~or condltJ{~ns at I
, Mouck 'continu 'u'(shOuld. be':'able!to"sayi-., . , urrerit'site oncAroria Street.,!,. ,<, ,', :, ,I
I'"" {"'?-_"'_' t'l:,. .i>J~J\~ v>t',..)~ i""'JC" "-"''''~ii-r..!f~<'''' .;..u ...~. _~;,/ \;lZ 1..rf~.q1'ii~jOi"-~ .~JU.'::<-~'.'>_lJ""fl\...,...' U,,"J _". ,~,.~ <":,.~;I..J'
this 'is' wliat 'w >' . e" is:is'" e 'yi:'esiuenLdirectly affected b~, tlie :1
! ....~. ~:..~..~"~.. :.. .....I~.:..~ "~-i-:-;.~:~,:~~:.Jj ,....~f} ~t 11.pJ'~~~~~'"\t~}lP'__~~/-. '~.:<~ .~/....J/;.JI"Ti ..~,n,I-'J.t ...dj ..:
. "'~9.(J.1g~;~<i~~t;,c;'?f~,e::cltJ~e , ~~.yl iil.:~'" 1;\;1 ,2~iiJ.~I,~ji~,u~~ne ~a~,n~,~~t:ln;'a hpm,~'q~~er( 'I
, hj,~,WY,( of~~ppr?~ing:~e(e(el1~tims2w~e?", ey,~~~~;",,,I,i'f.i9g:':"a'sr<;W~ Jrom1;9ity;! Hall' ;g~ It,he ,western, i
, ptppos~(J to 'th,e~'coriectl)', :rhi~'Brop;o,~ans:w~y'n:-~~o~:~.e~~i?J, '~9u~tr. RO,ad, C '!In,d. Lexington:i
."~~~~i~~ft[~R~~i.rJ~g~i~~,!~gJ~~~~~r]1~j~~~~~~'::';~i~~,~~~i'.'.~l ('{{ii:~'h:~:~~;~~~X~' ~~:l:k'::,'~,b~~t" " ~ h'e :~;
O'lal was built.;'Letthe pe'9ple have 'a,' say in " possi~il.jt~~,s(al)d);tlje:'niCe buildings you war!! t9:"J
:~R~~~[dfni,~~~f~~#~~~~~~~I~il~i<g~~~~f6s'~ff~~l!~;t~~~tf.i~~~~r~11~~~rt~'i!~f~~~~~!th~~~r;~~":1
:;?1,t\What?s- th~"'r,u5~,?'~;Berr~:.~!)ked,taS.k;,for~e",liPl,an;to?~~!!~r!,\b$e.ptern.ber; anc;l;.no.~, I, don,~t, oj
r~r}~~s:\~:.~Yf';:i~~~it. . ~fr{~~{f;:11,if~~ff3:~t:~~;i;t~;IT~
le~,Clty Ce!1t~~~[)I~trl,~ J.. ,1~h)v:.O:~I~~~Jp~gu~d~'M~"
, M6blleHo,",'e~.~r~;atid' ,all;t~e.prqperty~West~:of.:i'r
t ~ ,'u: ::',,' );:, :~~. ~~,:fiJ~" ~i;~:b;~::~<,<:)>~~~;:;;iJ}!
i 'know wli . 'oini';;.:io:'tie"at 'if this',dian' e'?""-)' ;",
r ~~~,: th'~~;~g~';;~)!~~~,t~#~rg\p'~:y ,life.:'j~~l~t.eJt/,r
f, ~?m,e9,o.,e~~I~,~{p~~Y'~,9PNr()hqf. f11Y;'; p,rqp~r-t~":;:";:'r::: '~/~5:
~<:' ',:,cc b,\VasHer~" before,;the. Ce.l1tgJ.;'~arJ<{:~~fore :FiJ J
~~rf;~~~~~~fd\1~~;~{~~f~Jl~~~\0~ '.. ~
~: ;cpr~~r.,::Wel.li::-tfi,a.!iC:.9rn,ers:,pr;l':tJy:;slTI!lJI, now.;;,,;,I,';,:. e:,:~'..,
[''thii';;''., ,oN'r '125 ;;;~<tev'l.p.d'aCi." ;n"h"~" 'f'" "",',,;fiif:';;i~ '
tltfitfi1irtif~ti~?i,r' ;'5.i;;E,I~
";nei "hborho6d(the'n~' s;,~lwa""s'ia'sti'l1lCerwhCi:rUii1
~flrljt~fn:.' '/k:~~~i
r~}j~{2~:~hIi\~
~~~~~~
l;i1 :;:;' c". '
"')..::
~~:'~~y:; ',;:
~\il<::~
iit1
r~f::,~\\'.h .'r'V'h\,~,.~,~",~~,!!lX~;;", ;"\" ~~~r~'at
t\t,~~:~Oi!na,at.~~;for~tft,~f~~~W:9!r;~p~~rDj,s~ri~!I'
r 'Ii I,fi:r\es~~<:!I~Si h t! V ej~~l~~,~~1 qns,:f()rc~!l~e.m;,
!,....;,...~.,br,,',~~.:,'.! J"r,..",e. :,e,:~",.~,.',:,t. ;...i~,i,'."I,:.'.e,..s,:,',.).',,:5'~~"~~~i~~~;:~~1.~i~t"~9:~~~(3R,
- - "~; ~ ,j...-; .>-<(H~::.: "~, : t ji~;i,.r,
I .. . _f' .J;.<<.t ... ". .,~..~~,'. "','_ ;~.;;?~~.~,i.
",,;:,:' )~:::Jf:", '.., ' > ",;k~t
~(.,~: ;,:: _:,':..rtIB:~~f~~r;'B' ,
", . .'....;,. ,rt, \~. " '1 .. - ;": : .' .
\,.-,1'('";,1, 'I' .... _ " .
i"''';'!, '" ';.";: ,'~;Jl~~~'~:i~',~;~'i'~n0\UO~:
",....'.,..,'.'....'.'.' ....'...'."..','.""'.8~'
,,0,:';,,:,:, .' ""',.,'/."..,:T'O.LT'.'US' . '
.:.,.~. -,-:3;).., a' ~I. :
; - '. '."
'.
A...._ ~.._
. .",.
,'T",_
'--;'''-,': ',~..:--.~'-;. ~-k
J) ~-I
L-.-.J I
f
aNti
uo~6u!xal
,
:1 tOl 6uPtJed rg:-
o
,i>-r::::::::::;J /"-.
"0 ~
'> v
~
~*
.c:::::::J .....~
~
v c:=::1
"0
)~
~~
.....~
c:=::1 t:Y
:c
't:I
o
o
;:
JD 0
."'
t.IJ ...
z.~ ~
;:t \
''L''
I
,
'Lj
I j)
I
~
~
t:::
(])
o
b
. ........
o
-i
;(~~~
u~
~
o
o
..-
8'
"-...I
.p
J
J
~
J
"1-
J
-
C
.Q.)
Ef--
ten
roen
c..-
Q.) -
0\0
C)<U
coO
'': E
:u Q.)
Q.) >
.f: 0
C)Z
LD '
101
!;
iO.
; II) I
'~f
I '0 t
~!
~I
r-I
.cl
"'I
....1
,
I
I
'"
~
...J
'"
...
I>-
...J
...J
<
'"
'"
101
I>::
i:
'"
I-<
'"
...J
~
o
u
'-'
z
...
~...J
~~
u ......
I-< :>a:
to.) 0"-
tIJ ;:J c:G '",)
'" . '"' ""
::> 1>::1-< '"
en I>:: "'..,"'<
"":c ..J..J...J
j;j '" ~~;:::J
5 ~ 58!3~
,..I . >' p:: '"
fJ :i",,~ ~::j8<
t; 1011>1 ......:QQ
::> ~t;~ 1in:::!::~
P:: 1&01>1 I>::O...J
I-< Q p::. ...: <
11)1>1 QI>I Q II) P-'" I-<
:Z;,..II>I ....Q I.) II)
o ,..I Q UI :3 1>1 :z; ~ Q :z; P- ." -
i~;I~1 !;ii~ (iJW""";
:c '"' 1&0 IJ U I-< ~ I-< I-< 0 P:: ,'....
II) 0 1&0 :z; ,..I P- 0 1&0 < .. "
UII)08;1:~~~s~~~~ :' ~1 ;\
.... 1>1 II) <IS::> '" 0' '-' :z; :z; ,..I .....
Z~IoL1&t:UO ~zu.....< . ~~.: .
uup:: II):CI>I ........~p::p::. t, .:'
H<U....Q,.J~>-~p..z~~~.; ~It
P- ..: II) :z; ...J ..: ..: P:: ....:z;;>:,": ......
o I>I":I&JI-<,..I":~P::I>II-<" - ,
M " f"") " .,.J ~ U'1 ~ c.. ~ 0 to? c '.......,/
<<~ <<~ .. .. .. << .. .. << .. ..
I
,
.
,
!
I
>.
os
)
CIO
I::
o
....
os
..
41
o
CIO
...
..
o
....
....
CI
CI
....
...
...
..
....
~
UI
I-<
:z;
~
UI
....
,..I
~
U
U
..:
.c
~
'"
....
~
I.)
o
I>::
P-
I.)
:z;
...
Q
..,
1>1
'"
~
..:
o
<>::
~
:z;
<
I-<
o
...J
IJ
:z:
...
~
<
""
w
U
<
1&0
a:
::>
II)
~
:z;
....
I-<
:z;
o
U
~
<
:c
w
~
...
:>
o
a:
=-
~
I.)
~
o
U
a:
o
"-
<
w
a:
..:
w
u
<
1&0
a:
::>
'"
~
P::
~
101
I-<
<
W
<>::
u
'"
'"
6
:z:
'"
OJ
1:1
<
l>-
I.)'
:z:
...
'-'
:z:
...
:3
'"
1>1
~
....
:>
o
<>::
=-
~
W
I-<
:z;
:3
""
IJ
:z:
...
'"
'"
w
a:
~
I>-
o
I-<
w
w::>
~:z;
>~
0<
a:
1>-<
...
,<>::
o
~t>
... ...
1-<:>
~I&o
W"-
P-O
0<
::J~
...<
1&0
a:
wo
::>1&0
:z:
...
I-<
:z:
o
u
~
z
<
'"
w
~g!
...Jw
I-<
c..:>'"
:z:>-
...'"
g<>::
::Z~
~<
:3
<>::
o
'"
c
o
..
...
." I:: ca
c.......
:> ca OJ
.c ... CI
.:J ..
41 0 0-
> 0-
"" 0 co en
....... ....
...c
:> ...
o
>.0
...
)
o tI!
.c c
.... "'C V. "'1""1
01::'"
~ q) OJ ~
.. '" .:J
UQ,lcG...-t
.. S 41 ..
.....................
o ., ~ t:
'" 0
.. OJ
......
:;)Coi,:i:"tJ
o ..c to.I c
>.... os I'j i I
~~~~ it\. -:
-"'.... ~ ~
BH~ ~~~};9"
.. "III ~ ~ OJ - <.u!
g ~ ':; -;: ~ = - ..
>-.o.oCJ~
..c...-i.....c:
. oc..... ~ "'"
.. ~ 0 ~
gAY N01~NIXn
.. ...
<II ..
~~
....
CI
'"
~
S
I<-
W
'"
:;;:
eo:
t) ... : - ~ ~\ ~\ ~ V/CTORIAST. .J
.~ ~ : j ~ \\ \. , <.~ : I ~I
._ ' '\~ \ a.. .... i :
\ . \ ....
"'d .." i \\~ \ \ \ / ,o,,:i I
~8 ~ 0.. ".\~),;.~~/i~i i ,-
~ ~ h!r~ Ii: Iii i I I " 5 L ~ ~
Va 000"" .., $ !H I! Ii! ~ Cl.
.... .... o'Ufi I j ______ ~ \
.- ~ ___ :::a:::'" :~~
~ 'if-If I 1 i . ~ \- ''I.",' , ~ ' \ /
~ ..6 _-~ I_HI ~I! ! ~i ~ :~ "'~<1' ", (J)", !"'~ ~I~\ ~ \/
c!j 00 _ 1~ ..,j ~t "'" ""1' , :is "\ ~<J
. _ :3 . 't"'" " 9 '
~ 0 ' 'I:' '" i' "'-, ' i: .:
~ ~ - I I .... ~' ~ '<\ ~ l(:
~ Q) I I \ ; '"- ~, ~V~ ~ I G ! ..
~ U I j ~ ~\ ~ ~ I'
] .f' ,NST AGLfNST ,,-\ ~ ! j ~ I ~
~ ~ I I! ~ c-i I ~'S \ I ~ 1j
I
I
CHURCHILL ST a::: I
I I J: : ::J:jo:: I 0:: 0:: I~I I
a:: 10:: a:: i Bn ~o:: ::J: II::J: ::J: 0::
== == == "'" == == == en ~ i... : I::J: I
Q) Q) "'" .... _ I.... I Iii, 100...
-B ;g LE>I1NG ON AVO N ' ~GTON AVliN ~ -
~ m ~ .! ,,' -~'==
"''' 0 :a~" <(
.s e :;- Q 0 .. 1-,-
3~!:! <( CLIO CI)
" Q. 0 '=' ~ - ~:--
fE. q: It' u:--
it IU t ) I-- ~-
t:: / ~ -'< m ~~ ~\ ~~ I ~ ~J_ 0
II ~~ ~~ ,,~ 'o~--.J 0 ~ I ==-
I ~ {j /' ~ · 0 ," ...;,.,. "7N t---..
~ tn T I \ I \ \ II \ 1 1n t\: <\ I t:=:
~ Q) II GRlGGSSTN I 11:",0 , ~ i -
~"'d ~~
~ a ~~~
00 ~ ~~ I ~ \. ,
Q) G' ~~ J ,. ~ L
['~ f11TJJTI . . ~ ,,~ - :E
~ 5 IJIIljJJ ~ ~ -wv~~ ~
:-::: ~ MERRILL ST ~ ~ ;,3 f------
>~ <( I ~ ~I:: II: -
~"a i!: ~ ~~-'< t ~
~c3 a g >"" ~ ~rr-::N ~=
'08 tHttEB ITIID fr _;.~~~~iDELL--~N;=
.q,-, HURONST Ll.JJ.J-J ~. ~ :--I~ *-
U I IllTfTlil i I i I ! I I I Ii r-----1~- Q: -
i '! I I ! ! ' . : i ' !---!!E r I' u -,
! I' " ~ - , ~~ ~
_. .. __ on 0
'.
':...:'<;
-
.~
1
'"
:0
~;
;;:; .J! I
,I ~ I'
=- ~' ~
<3z ~ r'1 ;
B ~i
J..' ~ ,
o
c
~ C2
., a: -J
o U1
... QI c: ~
Qi,~ 0 <u
'Z U1:;: ~
... c ~ QJ ,
QI C ~
.!!! .r:.E' ~
Qlf!U1....
.Q a.QI QJ I
~E'C~
o 0
U ~'
~;-:' )'
~
I.",)
-
~=:
:c~
E---
Q
:!a~
;;;.z
a:-
<~
Q~
Z..JI
;:JQ.
Oa:
=~i
~E-I
:cz
E--~
~u:
Q>I
....E--I
00....
~u,
..(Q
~~:
=00
<~
o
==
Q.,
== i
, ~ t I
~ ~ 6 ;
~~~ l~ I
"S,~~ ~ i
~C~ 'I
r--~ :;
,~::~.,.';;;:';'~~:71\-:'t '~,::.-;:q :')1 )~ ,'. ,. (FJ ,?,,',t'J.'
'1>':, :'f> _ - , 'I g::, '.:" .It'" 1.11". I':';'
., .::~, ~HS( I · .~--' f5 \ :i ~
"';~"::~\":;~s/d ~ 1':' ~ ~, .' ~ :' I' ,-,
.~:':.~.,. .\.," ~\., ,t :",' \,.J!tJ""",.",:,':',':,..:-"., : ~ n ..:\"t ~
'~,..," f4i.;:" (l:,:'f " :.~l~"~-
\~t~ . ~~~~ )! ~ ~ .N!1013S0~ 91 : ,i~ " ,(
'\',.... ~ ""~"";. r.'" -!J..:::::c::::::::::,t?,...: ~~ 'I, ' ,~
~~S::'. .. '::,', ".' ..h.v~~';';~ :\\, :
,. ,_ ::., _ .!JJ I II -i -t,
.":',.'\ cf'- I:;.. .: :,....."'"'s;..:s~ ,:~, "
..;{:~~ 11::\:; . t; , .... :',:,';:~i;j;,:,~. ,:~-,'
,''':.'~), 1 :' " _..'.. T : ,ill . I :: ~ I:' 1 ~ ':" ',:' I':
~>, 1 iii$ '~; ~';.~~!~;; ,Ii r i i1' .n,! ~ ~! f: f L
~:~~""u::' 1 8: " *' ,: ~ : ~ I' r I'"' ~:: L ..,' ,i:1 .~ ,~:j,:
~,.,.." .~ ~,' ...-6". d I,,'i' I::~ !t(1 " W"
.; ~ ! ~:Z!':;;:~~;'i':;.~';:~;";' ~fi' ;'-:J:: · !J;;: : ::~. ~n ~ ~': :.,' ~::
. " _ ," (', ~:' r .. ". ~'I !iI': w :; "
~ : \ ,_u_;, "", ': :,' a:{ I' I!! I' .~: to ::iOi!.:: j,.
, I \,,\ "--?:;;:~':':~:;ii5JdiX::: ,:',1.. I_':.'....~,:. (11"," . j.... ':'
~~1~\. .... 't,,'::'~;<.{,I,',[.:.";.::,:;,",:!,::.:.'.: :.'0' .,j,;;
~i[~'''~<::.,\_: .... . . - ................
1 Ii} jl;~"~CiC:Te:" ~~\,i',ll1,i,'P,!I>;I,[t !:'
, . i: 'I en . f' I '; HJ..~ I
i :!i~~~,~. M ...... ::: J '2' '.' :~,'}.. ~ ':~'~ii~~! ~
"'",.,1..........::1:1 ..;,.!Q,'I'ii!:' t ,',
.'...............-...."14 ..::, ~:, :>"''V
N" -:y~~fWi:~ ;;t ~:: 91; ~::!~\
.. CI);'; ...._... .._I ;;Ij II ::!. it; i ~~:::. ::::.
~ ._,_:_.::::::::_::::::!::~,:~,:,"::::-":.'---':: ;. ;,.,;CD! i ::: - ".1; ~:
~+Ih-..,.~"Q.v .... ........., , q:\,:
.,. ., .. ':::;~~7' \,1" """.,'",..,',.,A,',",..,V,','~,'.'.8,,! ~ ~;\\~,~,'~,'':",'','~,'..,.~.'~,'~,:,~,',7,:',!.,~~J,' ~ l[;.,.~,:,~,';~,f,~,~,:..,i,...,.~,.~,.. .
lJIIG.!~~::::::::::::::::::,:c,::~I. - ... . <:. ..
';J""" m:~ rr:~~,II~i) I NoioNiX37
I 11.1 t "
I, ~ \~':1w3~ '
I,~....:,
'-b'.bSi,'
'~:,
01 ~
'(.1"
,-....0 :::::.:;.
-::;t\.".'.,.:,
'~.
It'i
t",
......
....n....
'-~ -- ... --. ,-.-- -",'
.n__..".....h.......
..-..--.........-.
.
..-........--.--.....
.' ~'~~~~tii~~::~.~~fi'~~. . ~,~ i.~,~~~~,i i
-oil E ~::....._..-i;:. -.. "
:::::::::, ,::::::::: 0 '::::::'i:::::::iii :::::::::::::::::::::,::::,::::::'::::::::::::::::: ;:'
'.. . : : .t:1:J U 2i::;:s:: .... . aNl1M1W1 'II: ,
.:~::;J:I ~ ~1 li.=\l~~,:,:,.',:,~,~:;;;:~r.:
H~H I CI)~Oa: ~: -:( r 1::r If "<':1.i!!
.... i;- Q) 0:: i ~ii' ~;',~~,!" ~. \\0 : i
,'7 'too c:: IJ'... r ..............'. ~ ......
:::::::::, 'II1II ~.S( ::J F:: ::..;{ -. .. "':', ~ ,":::1: i,
ffol~::~ .5 Q) 0 .....:: ~H ;111\: ~ . ~ ii, F~ i i
~':__ E..JU ....... _" t ':. ..:, .::::1::
.- :: ..-- ~':-".. ::: '.:: : ::..... ::
..,....,...., 0 ..' ,'I ." ~"
.~~,:rf':- ~'L~,::j,~~~il
:w/$:: i! ~: l : ..JIIII;;~'i ..D.,R..I :
~: 1 j\g .,q. .... ' '
" ,.:
{'''::; ;:::jj;'-:.'
.l/~ : ifH~'"
',~.'J\ a I .-i I j....i; .1..-::::>'
~":'" I · <:J .. . .',
1 -II )\ '"" e'" LLlNq,..-:>'... I
. ~U
~"
8:;
I :
I "
; ;!
. '
Ii
.,::
f
""
;.J[;ii3[iiif:~r~'" .. ~(' -~~i ~(r .~i
~~~~H- :~ i!-c 1;;~. "Ii ~ FI! I ":,
I!:=:r::::':. .,i:"If' A'i" -"1/' .,,1 Ii
:_ ~L,. '.': i , "[' iii & p: i: ~
',-:!.,;:.J .11' .' I 1!:,,' ~'I.'
fil::~{] il~l~.i~~~
,~~!~:h\~J~ ",r~ .il '
~~il~~)~~i~ J ,. I. .._
~NljE(1 t"" ~
.'~. .< ~ .'~'
. r;:::::~". 'I::.
~':~~~~':.~
t ,: I ~. I :: Ii:
~,.: !!.!"..:' I H .
~lS...,..:....... .:,:,
. :hoo~1i:i::ia.,:;:':"
,( ~, .
i~He.,.. II Ii.
:: "& .1 .. . .
i!t" ...... ~~.I.... " ...
p' . ... --.....: '.. ...... ?:-'-:.::::...... --.........~;-;.~
.,': J.=....,~:[;'~.:.;'.:.;'~::'~;,;..~.,~[t "....s':.j' 3NI1WtfH ~~lj~l'-nt
_ ; ',':f.,....::(I(Ril..::...~'~':~..,. ,',' I. ~I. '\:.1 ,,: () ~I \: If:::
I rJM. - - t" ~I::I~H
:' ti 0" '. I J il.~;~!;[j 11: 8~!'"
,. ~ j . ~ i I;";';;;;;:;~'~];;;";';;'; ~ t'~:
I :: J! ' ' .
. ,i:.. J & ,:......'...:1:' .... .......,~:
: Jr.:: ~.~.. ;r~~1::~~ci';I!j
I ".:,'Io~n:J .IJIt, ,....... :/''/ :: . ..... ~t,':\,\ ~
.rdl - '..~ ~I"'''''''''':'::''':::.-~r'::''-
# .. -- . .. \~,;,'~. i,'<,i~~;:!""".'.,)j
VI .. - ",:'::;'::
~
I-
"
'.
/:;,,:;"
:'"
-.... ..
'.'."
..,
<:Iz ~
"
"
!
,
"
'"
-
~~
..~
~~
. -
o "
.. :J ~
S ~"&
: g .s-
~~~
:1
..
','
,,'
~
~
==
~
.~
~
~
~
~
~
........
~
-...
~
==
~
-...
~
==
a
o
.~
u
U
>.
.Q
'C
QJ
>
o
~
c..
c..
!'IS
>.
~
!'IS
'C
c:
:2
o
ID
en
en
-
c
N
-
it)
QJ
(.)
~
o
u.
oX
I/j
!'IS
I-
.,
~
QJ
-
c:
QJ
U
>.
~
...
:i':
1:\\ i
.:::::
.' .'
, '
g., ~
o
(I)
~
c::
.5 ~
:g ;.:,;::
.c"'"
....,E~
!U g.-
a;; >,
~~~
"-Q
I
j"; .~
.....l""~i
O""W"
c''>U .J
....' .....~
U~.
~f~~
-=f~
~?,,"?.;M..~
;::.
'g
~
8
...,----
......
u
.- ~
~,
.-
"'d ~
~-
en:;:::::
~ ;>
"'d ~
t:a ~
_ ~ ____.............. -.J.
~ .........
Q).~ - c,~
~ :-.c -_ ~- fi
cd 1;) 1- -"- H
.- ~
~O_
~ $...< I
t) ~
o ~ I I I
~~ ~-
~ ~ ,NST __ _~UJ2EAG"'.S W=:J
;> ..... _:S I
._ ~ g ~ I
en ...... ..., Q,
5 6 TrTTl OXFORD ST N 1;;[
1. i 1m ffitftEEJ
a s ffiET , I I CHURCHILLj s~ ,:
o 0 I I I i~. !
~ ~ I II m, ~I m :
-B C/) LEX/NG JON AVE N
~ ----
'"d
~
-
""~
',C: '
" ,
t
,
\
I
\
J
J
\,
"
cc '8~ir~
C") i;~
,., WI"~
Y. ~IU~
N 15 11'1001:)111
~
-
....
ED
o
......
......
~
~
a ~
'"d-B
~...c:
~ en
~~
~
~ 1;)
$...< ~
t.8'"d
~
~
'm
I ~ j
I'~~
..., ~ ~
I e; ~ a1~~~ ~
~ ~ ::. :::!
-0... :z:
/ ~ .~ g
~
I III 1T1 T
I lffiIffIm
IlJJJ F~S
i!: ~
- Q
g 0
DELLWOOD ST ..., JELLWOOD ST ~
tfEWB EEIB
I.nnm.
I. I I I : 1
"
2 n
110 "
c:: <II 9
'i( € ...,
~ CI t!-
" a.
t: q
<(
C")
0:::
......
C/)
~ .-..,
~ u
cr" .-
~ J:j
$...< C/)
~.-
::::0
.- $...<
;> ~
~E
o ~
~u
C-+-;~
o ._
.e8
u
--
-
-::: ~
~ ~
~ ~
:.J ::J
0...
.~~ \ \ :i
\~ \\ /'~
'\~ \ /.::./"
\~. /~ ~ ::!
'j U CI CI.I
~ a.'H ~
., ...
0" ~ '
~ $, \ \ \.
.,_ ,~)'v
10~ YCJI
I ~'"/ (f
t /~
~ i /
~ ~
0::: ,
.
I
,
!
i I' II I
~
~ E~
- "..
~ ,€u
~ ~.e
:::! i::~
:z: u,~
a .,
~ ~
~
Rosevtlltt Fire
SUtIon IH
~~...
=:.st~
~~"
'o.e~
~:J
<( ~,
C") ~ )
0::: ~V' I~
~ ~
.~ -g
'f 8
0,
J
\
\,
'I
i
JXFORD ST 1T
I::
~~~
~... "e
....: QI
&",U
-
~ :::
~ ~ ->0:
~ ;:: ~
~ ~ ....
.~. ."
">;I~"'" .'''\
: I"'I;,\\.:
:
; I
, ! !1
: t !
! , , i~
! !
;;,"
,~~
u:r::
I~ ,
I~U
I
I
:;::3
&~'ii
~~~
~5!
I' r \
II rTn! l
,
..
VICTORIA ST-N
I
I
i
i
I
,".;- >
"
III III III
! f !
u u u
", ", ",
coC!co
. 10 .
Q)"'~
.. Qj ..
O::JCU
'C S; 2
- w CU
.!!! c:(> >
C <t
"Cc
CU 0 0
U)'C>>-
o c OJ
0.._ C
0)('-
... CU )(
I1....ICU
.........1
00'"
taU;~
CU GI III
~~&J
i;j",1'CI
-cucu
~~~
,...t
~
'1
-
~
.:::
::~;;;
:.J
.
! ....
~
"
,
LEXlNGTON AVE N _
I:~~f---- -
~N~II ~_
11 ~ ~ <t
~~ ....-
~-;u~ fiJ-
rNN 5_
ItJJ,f _~-
(;) sopuo
-
------
~ J
~
II) di'
~
N ! )~
-iSQq ..... ~
~f--
r---L I f--
f--
--
1: --
i
g -:')- ~-q
I~ f--~- _~
l-i~ ! Ih~ ;~i
~
o
Cj
~
II:
~
~
o
o
.!!
~~
~~iO'
.!CZlC)
:;et
, ~ ~
0::
C")
m
~
~
o
Cj
~
II:
~
~
o
o
~
-..
"
I
i
~i
..!!'
""
"
.!!!
Q.
1:;
.~
Q.
o
o
~
-
.~
v::;
II
_ 0
<I - ~
z ..
"
:d
'-'
::IJ
~
~
0....
o
:~~~..
-...
.....
Q::
~
<1J
'"
~
~
<1J
Q.
....
11>
:S
o
~I
i
E- !
S2 i
~ ~ :
== 00 I
,. ...~;
~ Q~!
~,
rJ1 r~'2:1
.. 'wi ~.~ :
>- Z''I,
...." - I:
.. Z ~ i
~7 :::1
Q ~~:
Z ~-:.::i
>---.,~ "Ji
'-' ,.., .~
O-t-.
lYII=:t
- ~ ~
~E-()
==Z~
E- ~G
~ U ~
Q>";:::;
-E-.2
00 _~
Z U ~
- a
<Q ....
~~~
=:OO"J
~O~
~
o
=:
~
o 1/1
- c:
... 0
~ 0)._
aI.S: ~
... c: c:
1/100)
Qj N 'Iii
.c aI
j "0
c::
~~ g ~
f'i en Co
~~ ~ ~ '"
~.j t~
. E-
Co .
.. ~' ~ ~
,.., 3 ,. >.
... '-' " "
0.... 0:;:
~~~~ 'f
...: -
!-< ~
:~
~i
,;.>
, '
, . ~ t
...~~ "owotd.~ Lkrr
~ ~~~' ~~~""4I1iI!P 9'
';..., , ..,~
,;" fk C~LJ Or- f20$.ev'lllx- IS i~~:cd- -U~ '
, ,PO:SS ~ b d rl~} 0 f d 4A-\2.! Df I ~'(j C\. ~ (. e:;J -f..r (Y) !os {J.A-I (I c.-,
,ll~ SI-tC-, -fN"j O;C {OO)(i'fj cJ- IY)CjIA~ fPJ-JlJ.!A JdV1SCJv\
OJ'd VdUd..,--$ -PorK-.
(DLU\f~ 1M G
, :[-f (101.-<.. C}~ l il4jr'oC (.UJ. d,;..f(r!4 (k,/~~v of (trlj.de<.:>tJrd-d-
-fAt).:f n uvJ. c( ,fQ/((, Q.,wc'-'j. f-h/~ ~rJ. J ~/'II son fbrk./ ~rx.~ (Jr (rJU(.<t-:Z.L,
1:rG.. f(i0 /J~~, Clrt.! c~\~e..:$fi on ('1 o~V"t\. ~"-/ P f~t<~co!-.( t/w
{t..u of Lj<;u -;;;;)7'7 a,rot' .tJOil.0 ~~ Cfr>/M Qr wIde, f1oJ....,(>.l-;; O)-::OhJ-
iJ:~G(::;O (jv;& Ce,,J-..u- Df'/v<J/, 6'.;, 113~ [;viJ~ -II\O'''OA hJt../YA~, Q, LJ~/-
(1\. PNk. S .,d,4...... N.~ J {kP(){'ff...5 tI,,.q..:..(- &:,..t'/L. PJtll~/v-Y ,b'-;1. vo<u~
{ 'fA :"'1011 :1cb... €.r.v-I~::Ju. ~ ,11\L f~..'<;k.. {(](C0t: !Jqjtil.'(/wllllf:nu!-
tA 0 ~v 0 ' . -I: I (j. " I.J ..
&c.a.ir" tj{ec: '(j(W..t1\ ~ ilrv'-tA'-I. .~t\~5<,-e/J.dP~i6o/t1I(jY).
~{... tJ'C___!'Prt$_ ~ .: BeJL<j Y.Jrllf"~J-
~ '. :J..7Sc}"(fl.l/L-\6Nt Q
~__ G()/{- q~'-{4
-~_._,~ -:"'-
. '.~ ".-.' --_'or- .. -..7': ...-.- . --:
~J'flQ:Xl!.\;( l Dr; l>'.{-_
t'vV\r1-"7
II " ,....
, ~~0''''J~-r.!L ~ ih_o,'{)L
fV-
~ ~~c<c(
IVorzt<
r-~
",:;.
,"~:; ;::.t.-)
, ~" . ~
,(.0,; 1,';>0..
~,
6'11, J2::
~~~:
li./";~
:5UJ,7;.
L-l:JxF
-.._------_.-.............~----~-_. --".---' .
~ ..-' .......
-.........--'----...-~.----...~~;.-------.--~--~-- --...~~~':~~~-- ....,.~:O;I.~.;:~.~r?~-.~~~:-:.::....,..~. '.
:: .
--~~.
,,/
,'',,,,,
-;S
..... 10..
~ -~
I:: ..t:c
'" 10..
C,.) (3
~
-
()i ~\;
V ~
\1',\
~
II
I?"
)jY
VICTORIA st^
~
C,)
.~ Z
.- :E
"'C (l)
0::::=
CI) ._
::s ::>
"'C ~
] ~ 1",,- -"
~ U"' - ~
~ .....-1 &~
~ ;.... - _ _I-- ~ S
ro ~ - f-L- J!"
.- ~~
~ 0 1_ ~
o ;.... I
b~
o (l) I I
~U
] .e :liST
~U I
o 0
. 2: ...c::
CI)~
~~"
~ ~ rrrn
~ "'C =rrJJ
~ S EHET
u2
o 0 m ~ml
i3 CI) LEXlNG rON AVE N LEXINGTON AVI N
O ::s 1- I L F I R=~::'" ~ c-----
_ .II ~..__~ ~ ~ f--- I---
~ '-J~ i ~ ~ ~~2- ~~~ ~.. ,l;H l;H ~I--
"!::: .5 ~ .. ~~';:" 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ <t
~ >< t: '" .. c , I!: Q::: ~ ;;- i:H i:H 1;;""---
S ~ ~ [ ~ /j :,; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I---
"'C ~ t: <t <c ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ') i ~ f--- t==
~ ...c:: ~ ~ 1: m~~ ~ 0 ~ (t)SCIJUO_
o CI) ~ ,..,(3 s~ ::! ~ 0 C")
F=:.::: ~..... :,; g m 1-
a ~ ~ DUNLAPST~ ~
d ~ T ~ ~~ f--.---:-
ro ".. ~'" 1: '----
~ ~~~ ---
;.... I GRlGGSSTN &"'U
~] TTllJ~ ~~~
~ '+=' llIIJ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ l------'l
!~ HIHm am~i~~i\im~ ~ . N ~ "00 ~t:j E
:-;:::::;.... MERRILLST ~ Q ~!t -
::> 0 Bffit8<t ::I"'\::s I:: ~ N --
o"!::: i!: 5: ~C)~ ~~
CI) ~ ;:; Q '" _ ;l:. f-- -
00 5 0 ,>-",(3::). 1---
~ ~ Bffit8 mE '_I'~:= ~DELLWOODAVEN~
._ b - _~ f-- I--
~u ~ f--~
u'-' HURONST I nTftn mm-n' ~ =~=~
H-+++-H H--1+t+t-l == ~ T h~
,
oQtfi
~g~
-€l-g
0.; ....
1:
~
~
C:( hi
C") ~1I~S
D:: ~iji~
0: ..
N .IS IfIHO.I:J11I
II
~
~
0::1 ()
~
~[)
~
#1
I
~
or-
m
~
~
....
e~
....
,€u
0"
~-e
~~
u"
'"
-~
~
<c
C") ~
0:: I! .. <C
.n ~ C")
~ ~ D::
"> a
i! u
I--
I
I--
~
I-- <t
i!:
~
....
AGU,N ST
I--
. -
~i-
OXFORD ST N ::I
5:
~
~
!
I
OXFORD ST N
~
CHURCHILL ST
~
u
~
-
g
'"
o ~
~ ~
II 0::
_ 0 .Ii!
<Iz :-: ~ Q.
II> 1;
0; ,~
~ ~
o
'"""
"...
0:::
e
o III 111
... C '"
; CI ,2 Qj
... c'" ~
CI) .- cu 111
"'cc Q..
III 0 CI ...
a; N 'Cij l!
.CI CI)-
cu 'C 0
..J ::=:
~
~
U
~
~=:
=~
~~
oo~
~(J
~~
<~
Q<
~~
O~
==:
~~
=~
~~
~U
Q~
~~
OO~
~U
<~
~~
=:00
<0
~
o
=:
~
'5
~~ g !
10 ~ :J d
10 I-.@ 1 ~
~..~ ",,-
~. oS \0'
'c.ID ~~
~ b .~
u~t} a
].r:o~ ~
~~ 8
L--,_", __: ,:.' ,. 'I
__ _ ' I ,,--'"
'I . - . . - . 'tQ,..-
. ' -II - ~ ..
, ; 1'"
.... c".... ' ' I "
0'-'- ~~=-_._... ,.- ' ,
~ _>oj il'~'" ,
~ ~~ i Ii'~ /'~
.-' j;!,.,("), " r'/
"{'< ~~~. I II ~,
9 P I--'~ ,Ivto' ~
! c . a. '" ·
-11 ,,~~,~=:-,,2
~ i!" ::: .trt:-~.--~E- --~~
;!O i' S' 'j! -...\ ,f" f
<!:\"- ,I,~ j/. I ~
a ~ L II il'~o~?:l Iff (F ..
II 0 II !, f. ~" ,
- s.. ~ II Ii / \\!
I' ,!# \d
l' ili! r " '
111,1' .\
,i ii 1\
1111\ ['I
n 1111} !
........ l~l;
.--. !,.I\
q ijl"I'
';'cd
~ ,.1\1:
~ !Iil
~. ,....." II I,
_./ , .1 ii:l
:::-. ~ j;~L_
.... ~ ItH]-"::-':::::-'---
- i-' "Ij' '
~ t'""+ Ii II :
~ '" '1'1\" ':,b ,
" .., I : .\!:~ .'.q."'''' .
~ !~I .'.,.,....)}
~ '} \i\' ,",
..... d! :
_~ jilt::
Ii 1\ ~,
~ 'I" .''''
f"'\"'I ], iJ .:
~.... HI'"
~Ii I ~
r_ "'1'1 ,..,",
_./ \I'" i'I'
~ft
~~
~~
~
",
, "
,\ . \,'
\\~.~. '," ,~>.;.....{
,_~~, .. /,~'~J;
\\~::: / ,,;~;
)) ~'- ,//
''h,;! ":.' : "
~ ~ . 1
. .
Lake
OWasso
r
;
. "
05/03/99 11:09 FAX 651 223 5318
LAW OFFICES
,- ,..
I4J 01
Co.
PhDne if
Faa'
. ---- .
----_..
ROSEVILLE KOBn.E HOME PARK
RESIDENTS
77Ie CUll of lIo.f:I1fUe IuJ5 p..... for YOIII' pIJItc.........
City Center task Foree Meeting '8
Thursday, Marcb 18, 1999
The C,ity center development piau will affect Roseville
Mobile Home Park. Task force members Mapped-out the
plot for the future city center project which ELIMIN~
your park!
Witbout a Park Closing Ordinance, you may be left with
NOTHING! !-no relocation costs and no buy-outs of your
homes.
~ ~ ~~V *71i (?;~@@.._
Paf"\ Matiq
Whe~: Rosevllle Public Ubrary
WlteD: Saturday, May 8 1:00-2:30
~AnyQu~A~
ca.n Danna Hanson at lot #330 at 483-6698 or Miri&1n at APAC @
(681) 641. 8625. APAC 18- a nan-prom. t;A'nA.:nt.'s 'U'tWm for l'fMd"tIImt'.s
ofmanuaotured (mabUe) home parks.
Lt.1 [JJJ ~
~~~
M"~C
~;- f" ~: ,':
~I:. ~.'.
. .... ,,"
. - .
.. ~ - , ..
/M~
2395 Univ(>r~il.'IJ A"e'lUS West. Suite 202 St- PauL MN SS,}-- TeL' (t}~~~~.552J Fa:. f6S1) 642.0060
I. Hearings
1. Liquor License for Prime Investments, Incorporated dba Denny's Restaurant
J.
-~ClI'*
.Dt-
land Use tq~ r.e~~ ., DAft' ~fW). ~.c"'_
1. Seth Eggessa Request for Lot Width and Lot P.rea Varianc nd a Minor Subdivision at 1992
Cleveland Avenue (PF3118) S1Jff >>FIt> "R> -"tEW AIIIb ~ LDr l)"ZetlW\~
f. Speedway SuperAmerica Request for Final Approval of a Planned Unit Agreement and Final
Approval of a Zoni~'F Change from "B-3" to Business - PUD Lo~~ed at ~z..8~)~jl.!.I1I!p_~ h..... ·
Avenue (PF3073) 'f:M),~tJc, ~tJ) - '01d2JC. ~"'~~ ~ It'f ~"c..-
City Center: Table Consideration of Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to Create a City
Ce .. blish the Land Use Boundary of the District to the City Council Meeting
July 26,1999 (PF3119 ~M( 1!wU'tA*'1 J ~ Oit~ ~.
Ordinances and Resolutions
1. Ordinance Amending the Local Lodging Tax Provisions Outlined in Chapter 312 of the City Code
~.
t~"'
l. Reports and Recommendations (Continued. if necessary)
M. Items Tabled
..
N. Other Business
,. f:U,<tmt)l:.. ...,.,~ 2&.\
O. Adjournment Q.. iNe.t^i '-"r.u .."', t'"'
-b. '&2.M>L.V( I we> ~&1Lr
/
RoseviIle Citv Center Master Plan and Development Stratee:v
Roseville, Minnesota
PHASE n
Scope of Services (Draft )
L Concept Alternatives
Task A - Prepare a study model at I" = 100' for use in working with the Task Force to prepare
concept alternatives to be studied.
Task B - Revise, refine and document development program to be used in generating concept
alternatives.
Task C - (July 1999) Work session with Task Force to explore concept alternatives using the
study model.
Task D - Based on the City Center area and program uses prepared in Phase I, prepare a series
of concept alternatives.
Task E - (August 1999) Work Session with Task Force to review, refine the concept
alternatives and to select a preferred concept alternative.
II. City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Task A - Based on the preferred concept alternative, refine and revise the plan to create a draft
master plan for the City Center.
Task B - Prepare a revised and refined development program based on the draft master plan.
Task C - (September 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft master
plan and development program.
Task D - Based on comments and feedback from City Center Task Force revise and refine
draft master plan.
Task E - (October 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review and discuss final
City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
III, Implementation Strategy, Action Plan and Final Report
Task A - Based on City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy, prepare draft
Implementation Strategy and Action Plan. This effort will establish specific projects to be
vi
implemented, preliminary costs for each project, the anticipated time frame for implementation,
potential funding sources and who will be the implementor.
Task B - (November 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review Implementation
Strategy and Action Plan.
Task C - Prepare draft final report for review and comment by City Center Task Force.
Task D - (December 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft final report
for the City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
Task E - (January 2000) Work session with Planning Commission and City Council to review
Center Master Plan and Development Strategy report and recommendations.
Task F - (February 2000) Draft Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy Report.
Task G - (March 2000) Final Presentation to Planning Commission and City Council
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strate2V
Roseville, Minnesota
PHASE IT
Scope of Services (Draft )
L Concept Alternatives
Task A - Prepare a study model at 1" = 100' for use in working with the Task Force to prepare
concept alternatives to be studied.
Task B - Revise, refine and document development program to be used in generating concept
alternatives.
Task C - (July 1999) Work session with Task Force to explore concept alternatives using the
study model.
Task D - Based on the City Center area and program uses prepared in Phase I, prepare a series
of concept alternatives.
Task E - (August 1999) Work Session with Task Force to review, refine the concept
alternatives and to select a preferred concept alternative.
II. City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Task A - Based on the preferred concept alternative, refine and revise the plan to create a draft
master plan for the City Center.
Task B - Prepare a revised and refined development program based on the draft master plan.
Task C - (September 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft master
plan and development program.
Task D - Based on comments and feedback from City Center Task Force revise and refine
draft master plan.
Task E - (October 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review and discuss final
City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
IlL Implementation Strategy, Action Plan and Final Report
Task A - Based on City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy, prepare draft
Implementation Strategy and Action Plan. This effort will establish specific projects to be
/
implemented, preliminary costs for each project, the anticipated time frame for implementation,
potential funding sources and who will be the implementor.
Task B - (November 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review Implementation
Strategy and Action Plan.
Task C - Prepare draft final report for review and comment by City Center Task Force.
Task D - (December 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft final report
for the City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
Task E - (January 2000) Work session with Planning Commission and City Council to review
Center Master Plan and Development Strategy report and recommendations.
Task F - (February 2000) Draft Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy Report.
Task G - (March 2000) Final Presentation to Planning Commission and City Council
~
I'
;\~j )!:~;jif'~r,;i
::" ,/7~r:~i:T,~fd..~ :
" :~';~I'"
,,". ':,::;;"?P~)0 '
,. ," I
'~~
.'
~:~~~JJ/t~
,",
.........u...._........................
0"
":::."'F"
.._....nn...
".
o
..
11
..
".., ..' " II .-' ;,.~...,., /'. .'
.. ....'.'..................................,....~..,~:::::~~ ......... r?::
I ~:::::::::::..::::::::'.-:::,:.::. /',.,
&111 ",1 >:, [" ,,: :'::,"" 'C:i,;.....~,
'--:.. ~ :. ;.;~
IIDIII n!1 'I'" .,~!~
~E~~:~;;~:I~11 : ! /; ,,', " i""! ~m
~;'':'; ~tr;~:.~":v.' i.;. ""',~
, I _ !pl. : :, ~ gI ~ K.- i \ "Ii ~ (::;:/ ;" ;~k;<<....~......~
m;~~'~! r:::I~?::;1 [::::;~:.~\ \~; , r i :&
~;!:.:~:~;~;~I~'+ii" · "jI l! !:,:I::': ~\\1r....,~;
is 1 .1 ,..., i' d ' ~ '. ;
:_,/~rl allal_ .'~!L\.U ."~. · ill
,... ,'......,. "anNalf.lr" ... ~.. ,....'........... ........ ,:~,::.... ;,....,....::.:..::..~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::.:~.:: :\ ..... ,""'" ...., '~~L:...,::it.:;,;:::::::::::~::.~.::~.
,.::::::::::::::::::::~!!:!-:~~~t: ::: :::.::::::':.
.................................... ...............,................ ".. I .. .
~
~
;1'/ ~!:a .! . . I: II
: I ::;~! ,.ji ... i :I-:L
I;. i, ;I-~'; 'I - .. ,1_'
,;'):' ~':j_ !_ . i!
J j = -, 1 . I I Ii .
I i IE!~ ~. :... . I!. · I [I ~ I
I II~:~ J' I ;
.J .....~~ -..... ; ~ I,~~
.....1 ~ I . ,e.!. : ~
! "'l;;~ ~- ii"r:::. ft, ~ II-!!. --:-- 'I i~~~
III :t.. I' i . - .. II . .~ ..' --"
. ; i'lI!: a iii . .. III mt ; , ! ~ - '; i ' U" II .! """
,~..~,)i,!.~.........u..~,~...~,.~..~.........,h..'1 i le= 'ji 111'1 \ti:-- t lilii:L
m~f;;;fO~~.;-~~.-1i - - ,! ~ :~. i~+
~!i~~~~~7::::I! i) i ..~..~~ I~~~~I'~~[.,
_..~ . I ~,! ,~. !f!1J ,." j 11)",/,\,;" " f- \.l,.~1 ~//IJL :J.I- ~l"
::i .,,1 ;",'.:,:.:;I_;,~"" :.".,;.',.."..,;':;~,',:.!.:,',,'..,...;,,:,'.'.:,,:,:..,',...,.~~r:ri=-,,'. ~~:/:- "I :..,.:,~ 1-/:,:
I.,.,~,.,',.........III...~......,II!I,....,:~,.".r:-......,.....,JJ.......:.,1 ,::I,...~..,.i ... '.......~.'"""'. · ~, .,~........,'.'....'..',.............',', .... !!~" ".," I':'"
. .<..M~~',. : i :..,;',:,;"",' ':C,:::'<,', .. I ::" f---'-t.:~ ---- ',':"
, .. .... "-: I r.. "... i Ii :7i1~\:.~! =:1 ur~ ' =ais')J-":
"~=~~~~;,!~~';::::!" --_!', .fr~~-:"~Jj11 ,~~,~ .',
III!JBI"II!I~.I-'!:::Im' "-I..~:; 1: I' ..;.t:,' II1II ["]11'. JI~"'J...
1101/.11-1/ ' Ii ~ _ ..!!f!//J": i ; . i\ '- ~ 1 \ i.- 1- (n.,:
I"" ..,-1.... """ i ' ! 1 i j iu; ...... : i " '
" IEm:.' ig1 .. ! i II Ef !~.f~ .~I)ir/- ..~: · ~. \~-s-.r
". '.. g',' ' , " . '...., 'Ii · 0' ~'..~ I'"
, '," i i I:..... · -. ! i · ji Illi! ..~ i' · · li~. i
,~i;i;;"!~~;~i~;..,;;i:.~:::;:::::i::::::i:=~'i:::;~~i~i:C::~::i., ,[iiiji:::::::::::~:.:~::.-.-::::::::::::..:.~.k~~::::...:~:::::::~:~;::i~~=w:~
...
..
..
""
"
~
!!~
~:a
..H,
"Q~
f! ~_~
S'-'I;
<IJ ~?>
8~
II
o
o
'"
<::I z ~
'"
o
. .
ij 11 ..
i'! tJ 1
i]~!~ i
i6Hij~ !
~~~~>~
~~[JraDD
~ i
~ fA .8
~~ ~ ! .!
~.. t { ]
'H]~2= ~ Ii
'''5ii',,~ '0 "R
~ ~ 't e ~ ~ ~ 13
""e)=~.sgii! ..!!
IllIfEI~D ~
~
\
-..
~~
-Ij'i1
';='i!,;!
~!!o:...
pi'i~i1
!t'3~]'~~
IIJIBJD~I i
cd )
~
<1.) I-<
en .s
:::> =
<l)
'"0 U
u
a .-
;>
.-
.....:J u
bJJ <l)
-
~ -
.-
-- ~
~
en CI.I
-- ~
><
~ ~
0
.0
.-
u
". '-'!'< ~
. (. '1- ~
;1~o
11>&' rr.
'~~w go,
p,{l..J \Z CI'
~~i+~ E: ri ~
"il '~ E '"
~!~.; . ~ i
~~~y;i ' ~ 0
to-. Cl> Q 8
o~ .~
.~~ I
U ~""""ir 8
'.' ~ ,- , ... i '.~~.:,I.~I,,~i:lr. "~":::' ~:!"IU/~ .!~~i;U~
\,' i ~ ~ ~ r;qf~ - ,,' Ii" flli 1 !I' 1
I~I...: ~. ~ ~ ~.' ' "'A",'III~ ~j} mtl.!
I~ ~l" ~ 6 '. ~' :'-"[~;l~, t> "I 1~III~fl?i!
L'f~I~\ I/) III ,." .' )',,:, '. ,-J ~ '~mav.' III q'O"W
l=tij~~~ ---"', '.., ..- "~. '- ~:, ',' , 'I.' I~i' 'III U5~~~~~3
,-1..:'~ -1--1111 j~. ,\ il " " i!~!I!"P';!!, I d ~ ~
.~,' :J"r 'l~- ~~:;~,- < :,,:~~; II ,/; a'....:. It-~I';':-t~,~~ ::;, :!/'I -r
I~,: :a I,- ~II "c,:~ "I' , ,.., '~ "j 'I," I', II ,
i:', :,~I' :~~I;~".~'i J':. I~~ ~'~,-'I'~I,;, ,.' 'J; /'1..1 j1th)
l...!!. , ;I~ .~ I'.l.. .1>. I J! '" ):;,. . i, ",; I ,il'! :II. :I ~
. .--" . . (',1:" ~~n ,:Ib.:i,' ';\:.~ri'!w;. 'r H ~
I:"',',:" ,J ::':::::~:.:~: lig" 01';::. "',IT,,'J;r:~! i~~lll\,':,~ ~m:;II~11I
\ \1" lf~ II II
:':'1~1:-- "'i~,:.F'JIIm1 'f[ff -' .'~" · " :';,< i' i JLr ~
i";~ t. '::y;;r. +-,. ~EttllffiI1l,itn ~rLII:1 ,!!~'t. 2 ~ ~_,... _.___~_ ..__ r-=::: ~ ~
1"[ T'~' ~ _-----'-.,.-0'.... ";;;,~' j....,,' .....,:"'~;:...'{I-- r .~, ,': b. ' ~ ~
M .~ '1G1t: '-=-~:" t, ~~'- !-< ~
'rf ~~: '~:. :_, (j) ~
n ;: :. ~~;;~~ i 9' '1\/,1 ~ ~
II ~"~f-~~m Q \,Y
J :;", 'ir:--"" -. }I,!III' ~ ~
\. .!;I:~ ~~r ! ~r', ~ ~
;.{~':' ~ : .' :,:::. !' '. II ~~~ J:::f1.Ik1I;. ! ;f II I:'!
IT, :~"~~'"::01~t~tW ~j''''~'4~. ~~;' ""/0.<\111 E ~
tBJi =-':;~~~'!:;+::~~~"N g; ~~: ': :J.~:c=." il~7;jdr,111 5.~
JiJ! ~.t:!*,__.. .. -!-I;r-r. '11# C .' i,'.;.'~.d'.','.:Drl...1 I \1 U Ol::o!l
:.....~/_,:r:',:..,':=~'~,.,:.""., '..'~ :1't'U'" I _ '''.= . ".~',"" 'It I II ~
.. . II' !;.."j:..I-i-o .:~..; i ' /;.,~:, D is 'I III' >-.. [.,.,
",.. j .. .....jlu: ,.~t~~j,~ II~,M ~u~
.. .~' r.: !/ '. ' ~ it}: J :'~[~.;,'.'. ,', ';:~;ii,~"'<~; ;',;,')1,' I ~i' .UF"'!
. \ i. ,,' i I .. ,V1t I" I;; " ,", I'
. I ,'.; ~ (. ....I;; 'I f,'. '- J I I
~ " I Ai .
~;,\: --=.... - ~ J ),
-, , '. I . :.. . r P/,~ "
",-' .' , ......~ ",\ 111 r~. 9 ..
;-;-- ,.~ 'I. " I \ ".. 0 D
\,:~, ,\..... '1' ..... , ,\ 1111. ~ B
.i~ Ii :1 I ,~~!81
D~\ ~ :ill; ~ 'il]
-- ,:=Itf (. "'1 8- ]"ti
- ... ~ ~ >
0,;-,." ..c~
I '(;oAt ,~
I ~ ~t.i\, J
I""i~
I
-,
.-..
-----
,
':
<.,< ~ -.roo .
I.""
Ii."
.'
, ..
;1
.
.
~ .
~
..
.
, - I
, I
~i
==-4 -
JI
ir:
.__.....1..
iif
I~l_,_.. I
r~, ~lLi~ .
It
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Roseville, Minnesota
PHASE II (draft:6/15/99)
Scope of Services ( Draft )
L Concept Alternatives
Task A - Prepare a study model at 1"=100' for use in working with the Task Force to prepare
concept alternatives to be studied.
Task B - Revise, refine and document development program to be used in generating concept
alternatives.
Task C - (July 1999) Work session with Task Force to explore concept alternatives using the
study model.
Task D - Based on the City Center area and program uses prepared in Phase I, prepare a series of
concept alternatives.
Task E - (August 1999) Work Session with Task Force to review, refine the concept alternatives
and to select a preferred concept alternative.
IL City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Task A - Based on the preferred concept alternative, refine and revise the plan to create a draft
master plan for the City Center.
Task B - Prepare a revised and refined development program based on the draft master plan.
Task C - (September 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft master
plan and development program.
Task D - Based on comments and feedback from City Center Task Force revise and refine draft
master plan.
Task E - (October 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review and discuss final
City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
IlL Implementation Strategy, Action Plan and Final Report
Task A - Based on City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy, prepare draft
Implementation Strategy and Action Plan. This effort will establish specific projects to be
implemented, preliminary costs for each project, the anticipated time frame for implementation,
potential funding sources and who will be the implementor.
~fA..
~- \ ~ '
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER PROJECT - ECONOMIC MARKET ANALYSIS
Data Sources:
. Lawrence Blockface Socioeconomic Characteristics (Roseville 1998)
. Claritas (1998 regional estimates and forecasts)
. 1990 Census
. Roseville and City Center area customer/user data and community survey data
Step In the Economic Market Analysis:
1. Define the geographic market area.
a. Residents within five minutes of travel time ITom the City Center.
b. All residents ofRoseville living more than five minutes travel time from City
Center.
c. Non-resident households employed in Roseville.
d. Other households living outside Roseville but utilizing Roseville's shopping,
entertainment, civic or recreational facilities. (Based on draw patterns of current
customers/users ITom check, license plate and/or point-of-sale survey)
2. Identify current population and household characteristics for each defined market
(delineated to the neighborhood level)
a. Basic counts of population (by age) and household (by age of householder)
b. Counts by household market segment (single adult, two adults, three or more
adults, single parent, two parent, extended family, single senior, two or more
seniors, adult/senior)
c. Counts by dwelling type
d. Household type by age of householder
e. Length of time at current address by household type and householder age
f. Employment rate by type of household *
g. Counts by employment type *
. Roseville employee/Roseville resident
. Roseville employeelNon-Roseville resident
. Non-Roseville employee/Roseville resident
h. Household income ITom wages by household type *
1. Household income ITom wages by employment type *
J. Dwelling type by household type and age of householder
k. Profile of new residents versus established residents
3. Projected five and ten year population and household characteristics for each defined
market.
4. Estimate revenue potential by use category (Analysis of current customers/users of
Roseville's shopping, entertainment, civic or recreational locations)
a. By defined market
b. By household market segment
c. By employment type
* Assumes availability of aggregated Economic Security employment data or
employment survey.
John Carpenter, The Lawrence Group
August 14, 1998 (Discussion draft)
~
'^-' tJ\,
~.\
------------;::;- -- '1""' ..~"' " ;_-; ,..:. - .
"' . .
- 4 ..~
" --...- .-
....
--...
~
-...",--..",,--..-..~_..
.....~
~
.u","""""".~_
~.=---= .~
, -
'''--
.-.-..-...0____
.,.""'~....,..,.'o~
._..,....,.
,-....~.
-~-,-=.- ",,::y,~,.....
-.,."
-,::.~.-
-=C---=-,',,",.-<"
~~
, ,-,....,~,------
-~.~
... ~,,~ ~ -~--
~ ._-,--
. ..~9..~..=,_
~~ v~'b
~
~~~~c,~.c -=_~
-=~~
.====:...-===-==-,
-
,-",.~-
~
""",.....-,--"
_.__~,_...~"""';2f.....,
"=-"==
=""O=~=""""""~___~
:"..-=-~~
<-""'"......_~=- -
-------
.- - ._---~-
--~- ---- -~-
-- ----- -----~--_._--------_._-_.-
._------~.
--- --.----
- - ---
- ----~---- ---- --- ---~-_.__._-- ------- --- -.------.--
--~---
--- -. ------ .--.-
----------
-- - ----
---'- --- ---
------- - - --.-.--'-
- -._----- - - - -- -
,
----------- ----- ---- ------
- --. ----
-----_. --
-- -.-----"- -- ----~-
-- ---" ---.----...--
----_. -- .-
------.--
-- -- ---
-------
~
-
Roseville City Center Study and Task Force
Draft Revised: 8/14/98
-.
Assuming the Council selects Task Force members by August 28, 1998 the following outline has
been prepared for the work of the Task Force.
I. Meeting Schedule:
Once per month, beginning at 6:30 pm through 9:00pm
September 24, 1998
October 22, 1998
November 19, 1998
December 17, 1998
2. Staff to prepare a list of community leaders (especially Vista 2000) for Kim Way to
interview prior to September 24.
Interviews would be at City Hall with Kim Way.
Pat Morrison (Community Development, 490-2279) will handle scheduling.
3. Request Task Force to review interview list and add to list of community leaders who
should be interviewed.
4. Request Task Force to adopt a set of rules for operation. September 24, 1998.
5. Report to Task Force on interviews and demographics and trends. September 24.
6. Request Task Force to add/delete Discovery Workshop participants from list submitted
by Kim Way and Staff at September 24, 1998 meeting
7. Discovery Workshops - ream about vision and details needed by each group.
8. Request Task Force to nominate a Chair person at their October 1998 meeting.
9. Prepare for Design Event in Late October.
10. Further work ...
Q:\CITYCENTlTF-SCHED.WPD
~
t.\ - 0\
i~
------
l"\ InD PIWI'ERTlE,'i BROh:ER,\Cr Co,,,'\ \,
SCHEDl U: OF LE.'\sl:: CO:\J'"SSIO\S
For Property at:
Roseville Ice Arena and John Rose \Imne:sota O\al. RosenIle:. \Imne:sota
LEASES OR SUBLEASES:
........
Owner agrees to compensate Broker at the rate ofS150.00 per hour (minimum of I/~
hour) for preliminary marketing time and materials to be invoiced monthly up to a maximum of
$2,000.00.
. ,. -' .' ."'
Commission shall be earned on execution of a Ie:ase or leases for the leasable an~a of
the building by Owner and a tenant or tenants In accordance- at a commISSion rate' of S.~ ,00 per
square foot if no co-broker is im'olved. or S-L:iO per square: toot I fa co.broke-r dc:al J" II1\oi \c:d
for the restaurant location and 55.000 Ifno co-broker IS Im'ohe:d or S7,500 If a co-broker h
involved for the pro shop space, Said commissions shall be payable one-half upon ,-'''-ccution l)f
the Lease by both parties and one-half upon the Tenant openmg for business in the Premise:s,
The provisions hereof are subject to the tenns and provisions of the Exclusive Leasmg
Agreement which is executed by the parties hereto.
In the event Owner fails to make payments within the time limits set forth herein. then from the:
date due until paid the delinquent amount shall bear interest at the maximum rate pennitted in
the State of Minnesota. If Broker is required to institute legal action against Owner relating to
this Schedule or any agreement of which it is a part. Broker shall be entitled to reasonabk
attorneys' fees and costs.
Owner hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Schedule and agrees that It shall be: binding
upon its heirs, successors and assignees, The term "Owner" as used herein shall be dee:med to
include the owner of property, a tenant under a ground lease and a tenant of property wishing tl)
effect a sublease, lease assignment, or lease cancellation. The term "tenant" as used herem shall
be deemed to include any subtenant or assignee of Owner, and the term "lease" shall be deemed
to include a sublease or lease assignment.
APPROVED THIS
DA Y OF
,19_.
OWNER: City of Roseville, Department of Parks and Recreation
By:
BROKER: United Properties Brokerage Company
By:
/
,
Roseville City Center
'- (
Public Participation Process
..
Ellerbe Becket, Inc.
August 14, 1998
1. Roseville City Center Task Force
. What time of Da~i~s best to meet?
. ~on~or Biweekly?
. Third week of each month?
, fJtwr
ctober - Week of 109 - 23 \
November-WeekofI6-20 4U~
Decembec.WeekofI4.18 1'1 ~~~~ . ~~.,(.d-t'
........ &V~(,l II. One-on-oneinterview(l5~ ~\~;.~ .~.&l.J
(J.)P'a),. 7r · UJ~--~~
~ . Who should be interviewed? Task Force only? -. ~
fI ~ ~ · Wbo witJ:'P? Wbere? City Hall? '/e4 , ~ ~
~~. When? '''.A~
~~~Discove'YWocksbOPS(3' J.v.r1r.. ~~
(j> \~ ~ · Wbat gcoupsshoold partieipate? ~ ~..tr jr4MJc.,
.{~ Wbowill set up? Wbere? City Hall? ~. ,,~tJ.
~ ~ '_\."rI .Wben? \..,... j LL OJ WI.. . '~ n .
~ )r.~. Design Event / 1fNA" \Cl.JA. ~ ~::::.
.. ~: ::k:,:::::l;~:::~::? ~ -:,~
~.~ ~.Jo _ ~
11'-;~ Wbere? City Hall? v/..'SfX q,. "
o ~. When? Mid to Late October ~I'" ~ ~
~~~i~~. () y-'. 0
6~/~\~_~~~~ ~
f) ~ .. ~ ~ ~- ~1l9"
D~-'Opu>>~ Q~
. September - Week of 14 - 18 or (21 - 25)
t13
~
~~
U ~ GlQuO ~fJ\.
I\L..-:..... '"
~4j
,~rfh-~
'1
V. Community Open House
. Time - Week Night, Weekend?
.
. When? (Mid- Jan)
. Where?
. Advertising?
b~',~~~ \3
,
.,:-r-), ~,,~ .'~, ,'r"','c,' ,:,,' 'I~ 'r;-' ;
;,-:.~. ~h~~-.~~l:~;":})~~,~L....,;!.-r' '~:__-:.L_ ~...' .L,
t ,i~ 0.'"'-'."'I'f",'-c,.~",.,,),~,..d{, '('-':"'>>"~'i'~,
,,,~Ji:!!""!!!:, ",I. , ,1 ,', I ",I ,J
.. .".;;. ~ - ~'J ......;.....-...:.-1 ....:._~.;....-:J:-~
June 8, 1998
Mr. Terry Kayser
Grants and Loan Manager
Office of Local Assistance
Metropolitan Council
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634
RE: Planning Grant #SG97157, City of Roseville
Dear Terry:
Attached is the excerpt from the minutes of the May 26, 1998 City Council meeting
allocating the Planning Grant #SG970157 for $7,670 to the City Center Planning
Proceess. Note that the City will be matching the funds and the entire project (Phase I)
will exceed $45,000. Ellerbe-Becket, through Bryan Carlson and Kim Way, have begun
the Phase I work.
As more information becomes available, we will forward copies for your records.
Sincerely,
Dennis P. Welsch 490-2232
Communitiy Development Director
Attachments: Ellerbe Becket Planning Proposal
Excerpt of minutes: City Council meeting of May 26, 1998
Q:\GRANTS\CITYCENT.WPD
2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE. ROSEVILLE · l\HNNESOTA · 55113-1899
612-490-2200 · TOO 612-490-2207
~.'\t
~.
Extract of Minutes from Roseville City Counci meeting of May 26,1998:
Member Goedeke moved, Member Maschka seconded, that the Mayor and City Manager
be authorized to sign a contract with Ellerbe Becket for providing Phase 1 of the City
Center Master Plan and Development Strategy in an amount not to exceed $55,000 plus
reimbursable expenses, to be funded from a combination of a grant received from
Metropolitan Council and Contingent Account. '
Roll Call:
Ayes: 5, Mastel, Maschka, Wiski, Goedeke and Wall
Nays: None
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
26th day of May, 1998, with the original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 7\!L .day of
1997.
,.'\
,r~-i--tL v\&
'I '
\ ;
_/
(~~ '~
' -"'. ..~'
"-=- . "-
Steven RJ Sarkozy, City Manager
SEAL
April 3,1998
Mr. Steven R Sarlcozy, City Manager
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Cc:atCI' Drive
RoscMUe, MN 55113
Re: RosevilIe City Center
('nonmiqioo No.: 7491-981
Subject: City Calla- Masta" Plan and Development Strategy
, Phase 1 - Revised Scope of Scnices
Dear Steve,
We CI1joycd mceti1l8 with you and Dennis on Tuesday to discuss the next steps an the Roseville
City Ceotel' process. It was a wry useful meeting and we believe we now have a better idea of
the City's soaJa ad objcct:i~ for this process. Based on your comments and our discussion.
we have ..epaced . IDOR definitive scope of services for the Development Discovery Phase of
work for nMcw ad discuuioa with City Council on Tuesday aftemoon, Apri17.
ScoDc of Scnic:a
AJIist the City of R.oseville in pn:paring a master plan and dcYcIopment straIegy to tUlly realize
die City c.c:..a ooa&:qI( aDd visioo. The sugested pro<:ess inwl~ a five pbuc approach~
~-- ~. DcYdopnet\t Analysis ud A~-t of Future RequiraDeats.
~1..-- M...- PI--.. A1tauatiws. Master Plan Formlll~ aDd ~tMn Tbc
foUowiaa ICOpO fA..w. de6aea die work pI'OII'IID for die ~t DiIccM:ry Phase
oaIy. Upoa. CJ(I-~~'" fA Phasel die consultant team will meet with city couaci1 aad staff to
apeo OD . detai1f'JCl1COpO of services. work prognm and scbeduIe for the subsequent phases.
.PUIe 1 - DetdepaaaIt Discovery
no p.-poIO fl........ G\WIk is to work willa die City fAaa.mno and tbo RaIcWIe
-c.- -"j to.............. __ b whit dIeir City CeaIm caa be. the~
__ will rcMew I11III ~i~ available iaConutioa aad dIaa about die pI"OpOMId city calla'
....... die Ra.viDe ~ marbt ID8IIo awilab&e by City staff. This iaConutioa will be
....Ii. U pIIt fA. public participatioa proceas rean.. input from die ~l,PIity of what their
City C'ADa'1IIIoaId be.
the pIGda fAPbuo 1, wiD be . si1c .tc.......t. baIeIiae IDII'bt dII:a, Oo--it.y goalI aad
~.eI I11III . Wioa pia ... JPlimm..y cIeveIopmeat ......
the EUabe Becka PlIIDDiDa Team will work closely with RoscvilIe City staff OD die gatbcriug
and synthesis ofbacJcarouod iDformation and data.
ELLERBE BECKt\
".
800 laSalle
A venu e
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
Telephone
612-376'2000
FaCSImile
612,376,2552
....
~1..1..f,
Ref I
J
<111(>
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page 2
The key issues to be addressed will be:
· Work with the City to clarify the vision for the City Center concept, planning principles.
project goals and objectives and program.
· Work with the City to gather public input for the concept and development of the City
CeaIcr.
· Review exi-ci. site and facilities, planning studies, surveys and aoaIyses provided by the
City, iuc1udiua Iaad use. circuJ8tion, services and utilities.
Sill AINd ._~
Task A - Reriew ad RdiIIe Scope of services - Meet with City officials to review and
rdiDc scope of services and public participation process.
Task B - Gatbel' ud review rdevut base iaformatioD - This will include; topographic
maps, lICrial pborosraphy, put plaaoiog studies, zoning ordinances, etc.
Task C - Coadlld pIIotograpbic recouaisJaDce aDd iaveatory - The consultant team will
visit die lite and nxxxd exUdi. site c::oaditions and surrounding area cltaracteristic foe use in
master plJUUI",& and public ~~.
Note: Oblique aerial photography would be desirable. 1M ConsuIkmt team can assist the
City ill pthering this i1f.1Jl'JIUltion if not already available. 11U:s service is not included in our
.fu proptJMlI.
T_ D - Site AaIJdI- Pn:p.e a __ of exbibill dW roconI and iIIusInDc die lite',
~ ~ iMnd"w: Iaad ale, ........~ aad Inffic, parkiDa. pedc:atriaD 1...~.....
~"")'.""'" mi~ ~ ~aM.. ~ c1imaIeImic::ro.
Note: 1Jds IftIlym wiD pnwIde Gn OWMew of the opportllllitju and constraints to
dew~ II Is 1101 inlDtded to be an in-depth technical and emrirolllMntal inwstjgalion.
.4 .".1IMIqda ...". tIJOfIld be part of PhtIse 2. DewloJ1lllClll.4N1lystr t;ft(} bsusmenl of
F.... .......L6
T_ & - ................ ~ - Baed_ dleaaPw" ~..._It ~~ a
~.... ---y wbidademy i1IuIInIeI ~~CMOCa~
.,.~ ~...-. ~ fa'CIIO. ~ ~............. iDfnIIructurc
butwv......... ....188)' be -....~ to aappaIt die ~_t parcels.
........"".. D-. all Bc~J .tk ProfilIl
T.... A - GadIer ... ...mew ~.. eaaomic data - thia iDt'anIIIIioG will be provided by
City aft'.... wiD fixm die bail for the BaeI;pe Marbt Profile.
Tuk B - BMdiae Market Profile - Synthesize the ecoaomic data aad prepare a bascliDc
tJCXJQOftJtc pnJ6Ie (ae the City in tams of dcmosnPbics, jobs, housing, etc.
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page 3
Tak C - Ecoaomic ProjcctioDs - Based on the Bas-:.-!ine Market Profile and data available for
the City and region, project the economic potentia.! 'Jf the City by market segment (Office,
housing, business, industrial, retail, sportslcntertainmcntIJeisure).
Note: 1he Baseline MOTut Data and Economic Profile will he peifonned hy an. as yet.
unidentified economic consukant who may or may not he part of the Ellerbe Becket Planning
Team. The cost for this service is not included in our fee proposal.
lWIk~ I'rocIa
Task A - RoseriUe City Cater Tak Force - To oversee the preparation of a Master Plan
and ~ SIraIegy for the City Cellter, we would fP.N\ftIrnP.nd the formation of a Task
Force or Advisory Commitmc composed of 12-15 individuals who best represeot the interests
of the commuaity. This group IbouId be composed of City Cellter stakeholders including;
residents, busiacss people and civic leaders.
Task B - 0ae-0D-01Ie iatenicws - Working ttarou,h the Task Force and City staff identify key
individuals who haw . vatcd or special intc2'est in the developmcat of the City Cellter and
ooaduct oae-oa-oac iadividual oo-U..tial interviews to gain insight into the opportunities,
procca and poCaItiaI ~. (A maximwn of 15 interviews is envisioned.)
Task C - Discovery Workslaop - The discovery workshop process is desigDcd to allow
interface and input from key political and business organizations, civic and cultural groups,
~ usocillioas md special interests.
Task D - Daip Ewat - The design evcat would be coaduccM in "chaI:ate" format and will
allow . focIIIed IJUUP m ~ty memben to come to&tAber 10 usiJt the pI__i-.lam in
am. JIIayIaI fonD .... .....10 the vilMa for the RoIcvi1Ie City c.caw. This fNeDt will
be Jooaed by die iafanDItioa pIbcrecI duriDa the Site A..c....-* .... by die S.1:line
Marbt Data aad ~ PnJfiIe. It is ~ dW the ~ be by invitation oo1y
aod limited in 1IUIIIbcI'. The gcaenl public would be invited 10 obscm:, but would DOt be active
~. Their input would be soIicibl at the ()I'IIIIIIIImity open bouse.
Talk E. Co ..n.~ Opta Do.-. Upon the (>o-pIrAioIJ mPbale 1. the \WIk of the
,..-, ... ... (~.L"'I.'IIo."";~ would be pr~ 10 the public in aad CIpCI8 haaIe faIIaat.
~..,4.,:... oi the City.. pi.... team would be preICIIt to visit ~ with
c-J-_bdlL....ity ..~ IiICm 10.... ideallDd recant daeir C--_WltQft.
at. c.- y.... """ .. DcNI.M I~ PrtIBtI1a
T_ A . RniIe ... RefiIIe Site AJIUJUlNt - Make revisioallo the Site Aac-.fII'N't based
OD iaput m. die public ,.nicipatiOD procea f<< iDcIaIioa in City Ccamr viDaa. ~t
Tak 8 - ttmIe ... RefiIIe I'.coeomic Profile. Make rwisioas 10 the Marbt Data aod
Ecoacaic Profile base on iaput fonD the public participation procell for iDc1usioD in the City
Cader visioo ~'-l
_...~','..",.. ...~._- -'. ~
Mr. Steven R Sarkozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page 4
-.-/
Tuk C - DoauDeat hblic ParticipatioD Procas/Commuaity VuiOD - Gada and
syn~i~ aD raev.at iafClrllWioa gcoccatcd through the public participatioa process and
iDcoIponte in the visioa dncrnnent
Task D - .......illli..ry DeYdopmeat Program - Based on information seaeratcd as part of
the ooc-..uc pru6Ie. 0CM0aIic projections IDd iaput &om the community prepan: a
JPlimm-y ~.-. JIItI8taID for Roscvillc City Cada-.
T_ E - ViIiM ... - Baed 011 the pelimi...ry deve10pmeat JII"OSI'aIb aDd developable IIDd
UIIyIia. ....-0 a 0C*qJt pia for the City Cada-Ibat idad:ities poteatial uses, use
~""'q" .... ....ue:e..g iqJ.O.aDCDD to support the uses. This coacept or Vision Plan
wiD pnmdO die baia DIIIOIa iIMIepda ualysis in the aext phases of the Roseville City Ceotel'
Mala' Plan aDd DewIop.'~d SInIfety process.
Sdledllle - We beIicw: th.t Ibc ~ scope of services, outlined above, for the Development
IMccm:Iy Pbae C8D be ~iJfied within a dne (3) month time ftamc as iUustnIed in the
s.~ Wen PIoaiam aod Sc:J-h.le .tt....hcd. Thill scbcdule illustrates bow key tasks and
the public plrtieip'hoa process imafacc over the three month period.
~ -, We _-.eo that the fees fiv the Devdopmcnt Discovu)" Phase would be
S4'.OOC).$5'.OOO pilla reimburuble cxpeNeI. As refermccd earlier, this fee does DOt iDclude
the ICniceI of _ ~ ~14t coasultaDt. [t alto docs DOt include poteotial tcclmical
iaput 011 cnffic. civil. arYuo...-tallDd oCher profess.~1 ~neeriag services. The City of
RoIeviIIe aft'may be able to provide some or all of this -,itMn,1 professiooaI input.
AI'" <I".....~ ofPhMD 1 we wiD meet with City Cnomcil aDd .... to review aDd n6Ie the
1CGpO. _..._ walk .......Iad ~ for Ibc r-ainn.g four pbaea of the Mala' Plan
lad Dc.~ 1Ii~ SInIII&Y procell as I'adIn-I below:
.... 2 - Dr.nll,lM" AaaIyIiI ad A--.....t of htare ReqlliremeatJ - inel..di.. sile
I~.......... pI'OII"Im ~_.~... dc, This pbaIe may iDc1uc1c ~muNty
....0.-. review . pI~ Itudiea aad iDf'hstructure surwys i.e.. cirn"~ utilities de..
....3-De"AlUI t.1........- . IAIteruIna-Alliemlliw<mcept.~...~.
'v... ~ b orr-i'"'a M1__~. ... 1110 lad cir-I.... 11U.... may i8cIude
~_. t --... alC.1P1rio pI-itw wOIWq,.... -V...... ,~ i." W~.
..... - MMtcr... Perv a-.. - ,~.....pIa ~ b-1~ with lad
... .,......... ~. c:irna1...1IId opeD IpKe ~
.... 5 - ))eo{ r1ldoa - fonIIIIt to be ddaminal
lI'ri'o'
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page 5
We look fonvard to the opportunity ro assist die City ofRoscville in achieving its vision Cor a
revitalized City Centa', the heart of a cruJy "livable city". We are confjdeot that our services to
the City of Roscvillc will exceed your expectatjons in creative processes and design, efficient
execution and attentive clicot service. Please review our revisec: scope of services for the
DeveIopneot DDccm.y Phase and let us bow if you have any questions or need any
additioaal iDformatioa.
SiDcerdy,
Ellerbe Becket, IDe.
c: Don Eybetg
RoseviIIe City Center
~~aster Plan and Development Strategy
Suggested Work Program and Schedule
April t 998
Month Month Month Month Month Month
Phase 1-Development Disccwery 1 2 3 4 5 6
SIte Assessment
A Meet with City W
B Gather and review base data -
C Photographic inwntoty ...
D Existing conditions -
E Developable land analysis - ....
Baseline Martet Dlta and Economk Profile
A Gather and review economic data -
B Baseline market profile
( Economic projections - ....
PuIIIk Participation
A Roseville City Center Task Force * * * * * *
B One-on-one intefviews
C DiscCMfy Worbhops.
0 Design event .
E Community Open House .
Oty CenIer VIsbt .... MId PrelIm. DIv. Program
A Document site assessment ...---.
B Document economic profile -
C Documenc public panidpation process
0 PIeIiminaIy DMIopment PnIgram III
E Vision Plan -
..... 2. DIUI.~ l~ AMI,sk'"
AsHIIRtllII 01 FWnItcfJ _nts
..... J-DeL "1pIII1~ ..... .....InJ AIIienIIthes
................. AM-".... I
..... 5-DoaaL ulloA
.-....
--'
Task B - (November 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review Implementation
Strategy and Action Plan.
Task C - Prepare draft final report for review and comment by City Center Task Force.
Task D - (December 1999) Work session with City Center Task Force to review draft final
report for the City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy.
Task E - (January 2000) Work session with Planning Commission and City Council to review
Center Master Plan and Development Strategy report and recommendations.
Task F - (February 2000) Draft Final City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Report.
Task G - (March 2000) Final Presentation to Planning Commission and City Council
Q:\Comdev\citycenter\Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy Phase II.doc
, .
'~~ · ~V';, xV
~~.,. ~ <i' ~ ~ J# \..:
t# ''''~.''' ti' ~ ~'i oJ ~
-.;:...1 · ~L' 0 ~ESTFORCOUNCILACTlON
~r~~ . ~l
.~~."", ~::, t~.~..."
, . , "",, : > ,,:~{-,;i..~,', :c~~,. ,
'U',.., "q...' "",
'V .),.,'":.' '"
~" '..?e~~~nt(\pJ>roval
, '. . ' "" ""r?;{j,
DA TE: 3/10/98
ITEM NO: K-:>
Manager Reviewed:
~B-
, . Agenda Section:
Reports and Recommendations
Item Description: Approval of Contract with Mike Scott of United Properties
Brokerage for Marketing Skating Center Space
BACKGROUND
The expansion project at the Roseville Skating Center has been divided into two
components. One of these areas is the proposed retail space that could include a
pro shop and restaurant. City staff has met with potential operators of these spaces
and all have shown interest in the successful prospects for these markets,
The City is in need of a broker to solicit, screen and negotiate terms for these
areas. This process would follow public bidding requirements. The decision to
proceed on this space would be made by the Council after a review of the pro forma
analysis of the submitted proposals,
Attached is the proposed agreement with Mike Scott of United Properties
Brokerage. Mr. Scott has been very active in the Roseville retail space market.
The conditions of the agreement contain a 6th month clause at which time the
agreement is void if no successful referrals are received from Mr. Scott. The
beginning dates would be adjusted from the attached draft to reflect the current date
of approval.
POLICY OBJECTIVE
The proposed consultant contract is consistent with the policy of providing the best
possible advice to the Council on technical issues.
o . rA..~
'.Y~
FINANCIAL IMPLICATION
The cost for the marketing services as detaJled In the attached contract Include
. $150 per hour (minimum of 1/4 hour) for preliminary marketing time and
materials
. Plus $3 per sq, ft, leased space for the restaurant space If no co-broker
is involved and $4,50 per sq, ft if a co-broker arrangement takes place
. Plus $5,000 for the pro shop space if no co-broker is involved and
$7,500 jf a co-broker arrangement takes place.
.,The funds are proposed to be taken from the Recreation Facilities Fund.
.~- .
STAFF'~RECOMMENDA TION
Based on the interests to expand services and financial resources, the staff
recommends that the City of Roseville enter into the proposed agreement with Mike
Scott of United Properties Brokerage for the marketing of Skating Center space
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Mike Scott of
United Properties Brokerage for the marketing of Skating Center space as per the
attached contract with the funds to be taken from the Recreation Facilities Fund
-
.
~~\ ..~ ~
~~ i ·
~Z ~.
,"'" ~
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
3/10/98
ITEM NO.: K-4
Department Approval:
Manager Reviewed:
Agenda Section:
{: i
/~f\,::JI'''- .
Reports and Recommendations
(Continued)
Item Description: Professional Services Agreement with Ellerbe-Becket
BACKGROUND
While the need and desirability for an expansion of the Skating Center is generally
accepted, the issue of how, where, and when to proceed with the expansion is made
considerably more complex by the discussion on how to maximize the community benefit
in the ultimate build out of the City Center campus. In response to this issue, staff has
contacted firms with an expertise in both sports facilities and community master planning
for assistance.
Proposed is a Professional Services Agreement with Ellerbe-Becket, which has two parts:
Part 1:
An evaluation of the Skating, Entertainment, and Event Center expansion and
renovation project-This phase provides an evaluation of the proposed Skating
Center Phase 2 project with respect to the potential impact on future development
potential of the Civic Center site. This evaluation will be in two parts. The first will
review the proposed expansion that relates to the community facilities, including the
community room, locker room, and related areas which are generally located in the
northern portion of the project area.
The second element is an evaluation of the possible restaurant, pro shop, and other
market driven facilities (which may be part of the Skating Center Phase 2 project but
are intended to proceed at a slightly slower pace), and the potential future impact
on long-term development of the Civic Center site. [NOTE: This portion of the
Phase 1 review would coordinate closely with the market study proposed to be
completed by Mike Scott of United Properties.]
Part 2:
Part 2 of the Ellerbe-Becket work plan would work with the City on defining the City
Center Master Plan. The specific work program for this phase is less definite,
requiring refinement with City Council in the coming weeks.
~
3\0.
POLICY OBJECTIVES
This proposal represents a prudent investment by the City Council to assure that a short-
term expansion and renovation project at the Skating Center does not preclude other
projects on the Civic Center site which may be of greater advantage to the community. At
the same time, it establishes a process to evaluate the long-term needs of the community
and the potential build out of the Civic Center site to meet those needs in a way that
involves community input, market sensitivity, and a deliberate process.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The immediate cost of the Phase I study is proposed on a fixed fee basis at $4,800 plus
reimbursable expenses. This work plan relates directly to the Skating Center Phase 2
project (which has an estimated cost of $2,000,000). The cost of the Phase 1 proposal
($4,800) is appropriate and a relatively small amount compared to the total project value
and chargeable to that project budget.
The cost of the Phase 2 project ;s $45,000 to $55.000 plus reimbursable expenses. This
cost would be budgeted from the City's Professional Services account and the work plan
would be subject to refinement at upcoming City Council work sessions.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to approve the Agreement for Professional Services with Ellerbe-Becket,
authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute this agreement, subject to final review
and approval by the City Attorney. with funds allocated from the Skating Center Phase 2
project for Phase 1 and from the City's Professional Services account for Phase 2.
2
-
-
" ; 1RfT.:- ~It.:,-l 'j'3D 11 : 5~3
ELLEFBt: Bt'~.\<ET
';12 37>:: 2552
P.02/05
ELLERBE BECKET
II
Marth 6, 1998
Mr. Steven R Sarkozy, Ciry M;magt.'r
2660 Civic Centcr Drive
Roscvillc, MN 55113
Bryan D, Canso",
ASLA
R~: Roseville City Center
Senior v;~ Presjd~n[
Design Principal
Planning and
Landsc;ape
Architeaure
Su~ect: Planning Proposal for City Center Plarmmg Project
Dear Mr. Sarkozy:
800 laSalle
Avenue
It is v.-it.h great pleasure that Vv'e submit this proposal for the .R..0sc\Tille City Center
Picmning Project. We [eel our resources :md knowledge makes us uniquely qualitied to
JSsist R05e\o-iUe in planning for its m..w City Cenrer for 6e 21" century.
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
T elepho~:
612.376-2U7
Facsimile:
612,376-2552
E-mail:
Sryan_ Carlson@
ellerbebec~ct.com
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
In our meeting this ....'eek. you and a number of senior city strlf described the City's plans
for e.xpansil1n of the Roseville Skating u:nter and YDur vision for creating a new City
Center for Rose'l...illc, We: understand there lie two phases Qf servic~s r..\at we might help
you with:
Phase 1
Phase 2
Skating Entertainment and Event Center Evaluation
City Center Master Plan development
PJiASE 1 Skating Entertainment and Event Center Evaluation
Scope: Assist the City of Roseville in the assessment of me Skating Cc:ntt:.r o..'PdIlsion and
renovation project, curr~ntly authorized by the City Council. v.;th respect to its potential
impact on the long term development of a Skating Entertainment and Event Center and
the longer term vision for the City Center development. More spe~ifically, our goal is to
::J.Ssess the proposed 2ddition to the Skating Center to dctermint:: what way, if any, it may
preclude future development of the. facility. The Key issues to 1:x:: addressed will be:
. Recreation and Sports Activities - General review of plans for proposed locker rooms,
meeting spaces and associated f.acilities focusing on circulation, adjacencies and
general layout,
. Event and Enrercilnmcnt Activities - General review of concept plans for food and
beveragt"Jrestaunnt services, concessions, reception and gathuing spaces, banquet and
meeting spaces focusing on cIrculation. adjacencies and gtnen.J layout,
~ Visitor Services - Review of concept l.ayout for v1sibiJity, access, parking, circulation,
orientation poin~, rest rooms and food service,
t-1H;'-tje.; ..1 ':}=3:3
11: se
'::-i ! ~i:".~-:C
'_:-~--' . -':"""
-- -. --.
':':'=-'~;"":: .
~. ~ ~ ]'('6 2552
F.:2J3/0;
?\.'lr Steven R Sarkozy, CiTy l\hlla.ge:
""larch 6, 1998
P~2
. Operational Service$ " Gcn<:ra.J re\--l.CW of st:lftlmamr.en:\f1cc access and circulation,
servi.ce: lo~dingJdelivc::ry access,
Project approach:
o Visually SUf">ey I:Xisring si.re and G.ciliti~s.
. Revi~' of current plans [or the: expansior./re.."1o'\.-arion of the exl$ting Skating Center.
. Meetings/intervie-ws 'with city staff regarding current plans and vision for Skating
EV~nt and Entertainment Cenre.r and City Center devdopmc:nt.
. E\"aluatc and document findin~:;sues re~':lrdjng current project plans
Products:
· Letter surnmarizing the review and issu<;:$ uncovercd regardirlg the current
devclopm~nt plans.
Schedule: Our work plan for Phas~ 1 re""i;:w assumes we wiJl st:;u.c th(: \.\'ork:
follovving council approva! on March 10 and has ~~n ~>auged for completlon co meet the
!\.1arch 23rd date: you requested for council review and action,
Com.pensation: The fees for this service: '<A,.1JI be a fIxed f~e of $4,800 plus
n:.imbursabl~ c:xpenses.
PHASE 2
CITY CENTER MASTER PLAJ.'l DEVELOPMENT
Preliminary Proposal
This brief outlinc of the scope of v..'Ork for phase 2 is intended summarize the proce:ss
Blierbe Becket uses in community master plan development. We would like to furmer
eA-plain our process and have the opportunity to design chis process .....'ith you as a part of
the planning team,
Scope: Assist the City of Roseville in dcveiopmg a. mastc:r pian to fully n:aiize the City
Center concept and '\.ision. The key issues to be addressed w.!! be:
. Work with the CiLY to: clarify the vision for the City Center concept, planning
principles, project goals and objectives and progr;uTl.
. Work with the CIty to: gather pubiic input for the concept and development of the
Ci ry Center.
. Review existing site and facilities, and planning studies, S1..:TVeys, analysc:s etc, pro,,;ded
by the City, including land use, circulation, seI"\'ices and utiiities.
. Develop a maskr plan for the City Center.
Project Approach: The concept of planning team is central to all of our planning
processes and strategies. More importantly, we believe rhatplanning must be an
interactive t1eam process, We believe that a coht.:slve, integrated team composed of city
staff anclleadership, citizens of Rosevillc and the Ellerbe Becket team v..'iI! ensure: a
suc~ess.ful project.
-
.
\# ;"lR~-Vif.:,-1'3'3::;
11:50
EL.Ll::;.:E;:E
~--"".--
=,~'"_:o-:..::. :
_.; _J"
1\11", Stco"en R. Sarkoz)', Or; Manager
.rv~a.n:::h 6, 1998
Page 3
The .E.ilerbe .Beckr.r T~am (o<:us<::s on facilitating effective cmnrnunication ber'.veen
YaXIl1US communi.ty cot1stiruents during the planning pro<:ess,
Eikrbc Beck~rs approach co the City Center Master Pianniag 15 a fI'.'.; phase process.
1)
Devdopment Discovery - induding development of vision/mission, goals and
objectives, process Tefin~rnen'C, schedule a.'l.d deliv1:!rables definition, This pha5e
would utiJize techniques of discovery including a Discovery Workshop,
questionnaires, in~rv-ie'\VS, etc,
2)
Development Analysis and Assessment of Future Requirements - including site
research and analysis, program development, ere, This phase may include
community discussions, review of planning studies and infrastructure sUrY~s i.c.,
circulation, utilities etc..
3)
Development Master Planning Alternatives - Ahernaciv>;: concept clto.........eiopment,
including concepts for organizing elementS, land use and cjrwl:1.rion. This ph2Se
may indude techniques such as a scenario planning V\wkshop and !'Visual
Li~tening" Workshop.
4\
I
Master Plan Formulation - Including master pbn concept formulation v.'ith land
U~, building locations, circulation :i.nd open sp:lCe concepts,
- \
::1,
Documentation - format tv be determined.
Products: The planning products may vary depe...'l.ding on the specifIc ne~d$ determined
by the City during the Development Discovery phase of the projecL We encourage a
"Jiving document" format in which periodic update!': and adjustments are ~ p3rc ofche
process. These can be stand alone pieces or incorporated into a single document.
Schedule: Our experience in master plaJ1ning suggests that a period of 6 - 12 months is
pwctical to provide the necessary community input, cQmmunicabon and development of a
successful master p~n. This time frame can be tailored to meet your specific needs in the:
DC'o'elopmentDiscovery phase of the project.. The Di$Covery Phase may W;:C 2-3 months,
Attached is an example of a generic schedule for your use in underst.\nding th~ time frame
a.'1d potentia! tasks.
Compensation: The fees for this serv'icc may "<U)' considerably df:pcnding on tilC
deliv\:t'ables and process that the City will find most va.luable. We recommend that Ellerbe
.Becket work on an hourly basis for the Development Discovery Phase until a dearer
dcrermination of the process and deliverab1es can be mutUally defined. We estimate that
the fees for the Development Discovery Phase would be $45-55,000 plus reimbursable
expenses. This phase of the process would provide you with a strong vision for the project
as defined above.
We have a special in~n~st in serving clients in our community and have successfuJly done
s.o tor nearly 90 years. We built our company servmg clients "...hose vaIlles we share;. We
...) (C'
~:~~:~.2
F' . 214/05
i~'!~f~:-~;j:::--,:, S.j;j
i 1: :,1
::: . :::c:: ::.c
-,--'-' '-'--
.......:-- --, . ~~--
.t:::L: _..-:-.:.-
- '
-~-
~ ,-t:
~S52
F.05/IqS
M., Steven R SarkQZ)', City .I\1an~~r
March 6. 1998
Page 4
;:lre proud of the tru~t that many communities, u!1ivers.i!1e,;, and cOlyord-ions have placed in
U$ .1l'\d of our success in helping them tc\rge a pa.h t,.;,at ....il! assure thc..'TL success v.,ell inro
the ne>..,
mi1lennium. It is our philosophy that a master plan creates a vision of a community that is.
above :tit else, an inviting place for people. It means creating an c:n..ironment to which
people feel a sense ofloyalty, where they feel welcome and serur~.
We look fO!\.\-'ard to the opportunity to assist the City of RoscYine in achieving its viSion of
i~ new City Center, and a truly "livable city", and .......-e are confident that our services to the
City '\Nil! exceed your expectations in crearive processes and design, efficient e>..-ecution and
:mt!.I'ltlve client service.
Please feel free to C.(Ill~t me directiy if you h;1ve any question:> about thi:: proposal,
Sjnc(-rely)
c; Don Eybc:zg, Kim Way
C'\S.1M1,.jU(
TOTHL P.0':
-
-
"
C:\ITED PROPERTIES BROh:ER\GE CO\IPA"
E:\CLlSI\E LL\SI\G .-\GREE\IE'T
.J:J:~~:cl:''. ,:,,-, : 'it),
:'. :,'_';'~':,:..',\;,(; " ~...}PS(),~~~9.~(at.!~_n oft~ehsting for kase of the real property hereinafter described (the "Property")
.':k;~:}'&t~~}};J>i;~i:gp;j~~i.r~~e.tt'~~P'f,9,k~~8~ Co~p<iny. ("Broker") and B,roke~'s ~greement, !ous: its i?est e~rort~ to
'// "':'~'!':?~"f~ffecral~eor.leases of same, the undersigned ("Owner") hereby grants to Broketthe ex'tJusl\'e nght
'. ~" ' ,:"''f(!"Jonegottatt"'leases' of the Property for a period commencing February I, 1998. and ending midnight July
", - ", j), ,199.8.'(~e "Term:').J"helease(s) shall be on terms acceptable to Owner.
r:-:....;.. ;. ~,.- .i, ;,S",: ',' .
" .- -.,,~ ':_':"::~':'The'PrOperty is situated in the City ofRoseville~ County of Ramsey.. State of Minnesota. and is located at
County Road C near Lexington Avenue, which is sho\\l1 on Exhibit A and is further described as a
restaurant and pro shop adjacent to the Roseville lee Arena and John Rose :vtinnesota O\'a1.
NOTICE: THE COMMISSION RATE fOR THE LEASE. RE~TAL. OR ~P.'-'.-\.GE\IE'T OF Rf ,\1
PROPERTY SHALL BE DETERMINED BET\VEE''': EACH I\:DI\'IDL.-\.L BROKER ,'\''-'0 ITS
CLIENT.
,,2. _ Owner agrees to pay Broker a commissIOn in accordance \\ith Broker's Schedule of Lease
Commission ("the Schedule"), a copy of \vhich is executed by Owner, attached thereto and hereby Il1JJ.:
a part hereof. This commission shall be earned and paid for services rendered if. during the term: (a) ,,\11
or any portion of the Property is leased to a tenant (by Broker, Owner, or anyone else): (b) A tenant IS
procured (by Broker, Owner, or anyone else) who is ready, willing and able to Ie!lse the Property on
tenns agreeable to Owner; (c) Any contract for the lease of all or any portion of the Property is entereJ
into by Owner.
3. Owner further agrees that Owner shall pay Broker the aforementioned commission if, within 120
days after the expiration of the Term the Property or any portion thereof is leased or negotiations
continue, resume or commence and thereafter continue leading to the execution of a lease with any
person or entity with whom Broker has negotiated (e'ither directly or through another broker or age!1 t) or
to whom the Property has been submitted prior to the expiration of the Term in an effort to effect a lease
of the Property. Broker agrees to submit a list of such persons or entities to Owner not later than ten ( 10)
days following the expiration of the Term, provided, however, if a written offer has been submitted then
it shall not be necessary to include the offeror's name on the list.
4. h is understood that it is illegal for either Owner or Broker to refuse to display or Icase the
Property to any person because of race, coior, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or physical
disability.
5. Owner agrees to cooperate with Broker in effecting leases of the Property and to immediately refer
to Broker all inquiries of anyone interested in the Property. All negotiations are to be through Broker.
Broker is authorized to accept a deposit from any prospective tenant. Broker is further authorized to
advertise the Property and to place a sign(s) on the Property with Owner's prior verbal consent if, in the
Broker's opinion, such would facilitate the leasing of the Property. Owner represents that it is the owner
of the Property.
.'"t-1, .l{<(
\
6, Owner agrees to dIsclose [0 Broker and co pro~pc>c'i!\C fCnJnf:, JI1.\ JnJ J11 J!1I"'ml1J!.cm \\ 111,::
Owner has regarding the condition of the Property. I nc I ud lng, but !1L)r 11I111ted to, t he pre~ence ;.Jr..!
location of asbestos. PCB transfomK'rs. other [O.\IC, h;1Z:Jrdous or COlltJl11lr1,1tCJ :,ubsta!1ces. JIlC
underground storage tanks tn. on, or abour rhe :'roperr;.,
7, O\\'ner acknowledges that Broker may represt.'nr prospectl\ e lenJll[S J!1d c'l)Il"t.'!1tS [l) ,;uc." chiJi
representation. Broker agrees to pronde full dIsclosure lr1 the e\ enr of :H1:- ,:uch reprCSCl1f;1[Jl)!1,
~. ..'
,~. '.:', qwn~r auth<?rizes Broker to allo\\' sub-agenrs or agents rt'prt'senl1ng a tenant to market the
. .:property ~uldJo share Broker's commission \\ ith sw:h other al!t'nt(s). unless otherwIse prondeJ 111 J!1
'I'~' ..07" ~~~ r .; .~....:,,\ -r ~
.'\.!~,addendum to tl)ls Agreement.
, ..... I.~" ,..... \, . ';: -', -. :'.' ! " ..iif _ "" .' t. .';:. " ..
9. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Owner and Broker and supersedes all
.., ,p~i~rdi,s,cussions, negotiations and agreements. whether oral or written. No amendment. alteration or
withdrawal of this Agreement shall be valid or binding unless made in \\Titing and signed by both Own('r
and Broker. Any purported amendment, modifIcation or withdrawal which is oral shall be \'oid and of no
effect whatsoever. This Agreement shaJl be binding on the heirs. successors and assignees of the panIC"';
The undersigned Owner and Broker hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this Agreement and the
Schedule.
BROKER:
United Properties Brokerage Company
OW:\ER: City of Roscvillc
Department of Parks and Rl'ueatioll
By: ~7f~or- By:
Mi ael It
Senior Vice President - Retail
ADDRESS: 3500 West 80lh Street
Minneapolis, Ml" 55431
(612) 831-1000
ADDRESS:
\,
-.
~
---~--
For
Lease
RESTACR-\,\'T OPPORTl'~IT)'
RosevilJe, ~JN
i4mIL4BLE I.Wj~/EDIATEL}'
Roseville Ice Are~al, County Road C at lexinaton Avenue North, Roseville, MN
· Attached to Ice Arena
· Deliver space in "vanilla sheU"
condition
· New Build Restaurant
'~, ., Ample Parking Available.
'~~'(' ,i69Sp3ces..~ ~tJJ
H',. Near ~osevi11e Central Park
, .1:.... "." ,"
· Traffic Volumes
North/South Lexington Avenue
15.000 cars per day
EastIW:.~t County Road C
J 2.300 Cars per day
'<, . .'.' , ; ,.:.,.>:,;:$'.(:'~,:,~.;,'~\:,'~.~;'.,~,,;'
~'" ,",',',",',',' ,~'~.",J;!~,ifcs" .' .~' :,....
I mile~i'~/3..n.. YS ,~' I ::
~"':l~:1:.t..~ .~'_~~""'..'!~ ,'~-"'.'..... ~ .,'.
. .y~,~~~tions
,'~,:', :':.: ,:,' "~Rg$et', :ill!.,Civic., ,Center
, · R~s~fui:l!J:Aiu Park
"':~'i~:.:,;, ,." ,'. fJ.f/~ql!f:.f1{,,:~sota Ova," I
" " .' · RoM1ilJe'SliDiiitg Centif
.' Lake )os~Recreai;On
· Theatres &: Shopping
PoouIaIion: :.
11m s> ".~ ;
1.. tz.. ~
~= HH $61616' S6iJ7'3r ",?
" ft,: ....t:f.~::-!:}.. .
Households: 4,088 29,789 100,403
for more information, contact:
Mike Scott 612 893-8240
--
UNITED
PROPERTIES
"s PROUD TO
OFFER THIS
,> ,,::P~PERTY
.: .
...-'.-',"
" ,f~R lEASE
~:>:...:~r ",
,;
~..:':, ..
J~' '.. /: .
!
f' _
.... -
'..",
" ;::':'~~~~~'
}\;\.;".' ,!,' '., \, ':;;: ~{~;~ , --
,f.~.,.,'r.:14J '," . '"
.\-'f\-r'V~'~~; "
I' 9S9t. ON .1.I,,"~d
NN 'SnOdY3,.,..
OIYd 39YJ.SOd ~$..n
3~W >nos'
.' h')-, 1'.\""uU'~\ "!....:C'.'ULq\
jJ.1JI~ 1lIC.i!lI"',\\ 011"
.............-----
__. ,a:.."::, 1IJHI/l1/"
slu.twa.row.l as.tIHfi
.
United Properties is
proud to offer this
property for lease.
"
, ,
" ,
..
!lO'! AL:.!=::
5fH16:::
01 or _ :
51531l!i3,,::
03~ ,
REsTAURANT SITE
4,500 Square Feet
Roseville, MN
AVAIlABLE IMMEDIATEIJ}
For more information, contact:
",
MikeScott 612 893-8240
County Road C at Lex;neton Avenue North
RoseYille, MH
,..':e.
"
--------.--
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
6b. Plannin2 File 3119. City of Roseville request for an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to create a new land use district (City Center District) and to
establish the land-use boundary of the City Center District, Roseville, MN.
Chair Klausing opened the hearing and requested a report on the proposal. Mr.
Keith Wietecki, chairperson of the City Center Task Force, presented a summary
of the Task Force Report.
Mr. Wietecki explained the legislative function of comprehensive planning. He
noted in 1994 the Comprehensive Plan was updated. A change in the
Comprehensive Plan is a change to future land use. No land use changes until the
owner of the property makes a physical change.
He explained the previous decision-making process, Vista 2000 program, and the
need to appoint a task force to look at the City Center Plan.
The purpose of the district was to create a central area within Roseville and to
create a unique sense of place. The proposed uses included a government center,
recreation center, community center, housing transportation and park uses.
Intentions of the district include:
. Providing uniform access
. Tie together parcels
. Create common design themes
Mr. Wietecki illustrated the district boundary and described the parcels that would
be included.
Chair Klausing asked for clarification on the "downtown Roseville" concept. Mr.
Wietecki explained the downtown would be a meeting space, a sense of place.
Chair Klausing and Member Egli explained that they were both on the Task
Force.
Member Egli asked for examples of civic centers that had been toured. Mr.
Wietecki listed the following:
. Brooklyn Center
. Maple Grove/Plymouth
. Chanhassen
. Prior Lake/Mystic Lake
. 50th, And France
. Edinborough and Centennial Lakes
. Maplewood Community Center
. Shoreview Community Center
Page 4 of 10
~?rllq
(
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Member Rhody asked what process the Task Force has completed regarding the
trailer park. Keith Wietecki explained the process of the re-development. He
noted in 40 years, something will happen on this site. Whatever replaces or
improves the mobile home park must adhere to the Comprehensive Plan. The
Task Force is now taking public input from the residents and interest groups.
Member Olson asked why the VFW was included.
Member Wilke noted that the whole project would be completed in 40 years.
What is a timetable for the City Center? Mr. Wietecki noted that the Arona
building recreation center needs to be moved in 2-4 years and will include a
referendum. The schools are getting crowded, the meeting space is small, the
recreation center is deteriorating, the fire station is too small. The private
development is a much longer-term issue.
Member Cunningham asked how long it took to construct other centers. Mr.
Wietecki estimated 5-10 years.
Member Olson asked if there was enough space to add facilities to this site. Mr.
Wietecki noted higher buildings and ramps can be done but are expensive. The
public works building could be moved to a coordinated central location.
Chair Klausing asked why is it necessary? What purpose is there to amend the
Plan if no changes in land use will occur? Mr. Wietecki noted that the plan gives
time to decide what will be on the site in the future. It provides assurance of
future land use and zoning.
Member Egli asked for explanation of public input that will occur and has
occurred, Mr. Wietecki noted what meetings were held once per month.
Community discussions will begin again on May 20, 1999, He listed the
organizations that have already been invited.
A ten-minute break was taken.
Donna Hanson, mobile home park, was concerned about the time frame - when
will the mobile home park be bought? Keith Wietecki responded the reason for
the mobile home park inclusion is for a light-rail transit stop. The primary use
will include transit and higher density housing. The transit will be determined by
the legislative funding.
Chair Klausing noted that he was opposed to city acquisition of the mobile home
park because the Huberty site has higher priority as does the public works
relocation. The value of a diverse housing stock is important to the city (from
Vista 2000),
Page 5 of 10
1 Rebecca Caulfield, 1117 Oakcrest, explained that traffic was a major concern.
2 What is proposed on Lexington and County Road C right-of-way? Mr. Wietecki
3 stated that the right-of-way would be improved but not private property. Is traffic
4 to increase? (Not yet, awaiting specific proposals)
5
6 Eugene Bahniman, 2656 Lexington Avenue, expressed concern about decline in
7 property value on his site, and more traffic on the site. He asked what is "a source
8 of pride"? What is an indoor/outdoor park?
9
10 Tonya Lafollette, mobile home park resident, lives herebecause of location,
11 security; put a recreation center in Central Park. The neighborhood is good. Does
12 the City have any idea when transit would come to Roseville?
13
14 Bill Lonsky, 2725 Dellwood Ave., asked what will happen to Howard Johnson
15 Park? Why did the boundary not include Central Park? What stops a commercial
16 tattoo parlor? Will property values change? Mr. Wietecki noted there is currently
17 no linkage to Howard Johnson Park.
18
19 Alice Pierce, Snelling Avenue, asked how much was the grant? What are the
20 long-term costs of this plan? Will there be an increase in tax rates to the City of
21 Roseville? Hamline Center is in need of commercial revamping. Mr. Wietecki
22 noted that long-term costs are unclear at this time, but hopes are that costs can be
23 shared with public/private partnership,
24
25 Jim Foley, 2717 Merrill St., stated the city does not need more buildings or
26 transit.
27
28 Paula Griffin, mobile home park, stated she was opposed to changes in the mobile
29 home park.
30
31 Paula Maczko, Fernwood Ave., expressed concern about property tax, property
32 value, and traffic. Where will the building be located and what will the zoning
33 be?
34
35 Sheila Ryan, 2690 Oxford St., Parkview Terrace Condos, asked why this comes to
36 the Planning Commission first? Mr. Wietecki explained the need for the district in
37 order to prepare the master plan, Why "may" is used on complementary uses
38 such as housing or retail?
39
40 Don Siegfried, 2680 Oxford St., Parkview Terrace Condo, asked how an
41 amphitheater, pool, and all the other uses will fit within 121 acres? Should the
42 planning process be more specific? Why should Central Park not be included?
43
44 Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn Ave, asked what the zoning process is? Why-what
45 do you want to do with it? Where is the plan? Why weren't all property owners
46 notified?
Page 6 of 10
1
2 Joan Jacobson, 2690 Oxford, asked why transit/rail when bus system is lousy?
3 Prefer a bike path, no shopping center, move school to Hamline Center.
4
5 Mildred Roesch, 1000 Woodhill Dr., asked why adjacent residents are not part of
6 the Task Force? Is it possible that residents could be added? The planning
7 process is too short (9 months). Is the comprehensive plan the first step for
8 rezoning? What guarantees are there that the plan will remain? Look only at the
9 "purple" area with city buildings,
10
11 John Wilson, mobile home park, asked why the change in the comprehensive plan
12 to higher density?
13
14 Caroline Cash, 2743 Dellwood, why is Scott Bergs of Falcon Heights on the Task
15 Force?
16
17 Mike Flanagan, 1016 Woodhill Dr., asked if nothing will happen in 4 years? Can
18 the City say there is a "sense of pride" in the community?
19
20 Karla Miller, VFW member, asked why the residents at the meeting were not
21 asked to participate?
22
23 Delores Ford, 2734 Dellwood, asked what guarantee is there that the City Center
24 District will not be expanded in the future?
25
26 Member Wilke asked if the Task Force was asked to study a specific site?
27 (Lexington and C). Member Egli noted that the 1994 Comprehensive Plan did
28 specify this area?
29
30 Steve Webster asked why the mobile home court was not brought up as a strip
31 center? Why re-zone to high density?
32
33 Laurie Carr, 2733 Dellwood, noted that Roseville has small parks and projects;
34 when considering a City Center, would it change the scale? If zoning changes,
35 will the requirements not change?
36
37 Jean Urman, 1025 Woodhill Dr., asked for clarification regarding zoning.
38
39 Pam John, MnDOT, stated that she had not heard of the mass transit proposaL
40 What action would be taken to establish an ordinance regarding the mobile home
41 court?
42
43 George Warner, 2658 Huron St., asked what would be the zoning of Howard
44 Johnson Park?
45
Page 7 of 10
1 John Kyslycian, Victoria Ave., asked for details of the cost of the consultant
2 contract? What is the final cost? When is the final phase of the Task Force? (In
3 the year 2000) What is down grading of zoning in the mobile home park?
4
5 Sheila Mahnken, mobile home park, asked why the process is reversed? What are
6 the number of years to build a city center? Why did the Task Force not look at St.
7 Paul Recreation Centers? Why is there a "market place" included? Why is the
8 area south of "C", west of the mobile home park not included? Who are the
9 organizations that will be contacted to provide input? Why should businesses pay
10 for renovations? Not many of the organizations listed were located in the study
11 area. Did resident or city needs start the process?
12
13 Wendell Brown, Griggs Ave" explained that the Task Force has planned and
14 fairly treated the topics.
15
16 Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn, stated this is premature because all Roseville
17 residents have not been told what will happen and what it will cost. Nine months
18 planning is too short of a time. He explained that the city previously held
19 citywide meetings on the road reconstruction. Table this. Do not give the City
20 Council a recommendation. Take no action.
21
22 Bill Lonsky, 2725 Dellwood Ave., stated no action should be taken. Postpone
23 your recommendation and vote. This is a confusing project. Why should the vote
24 be biased by the Task Force?
25
26 Karen Bahniman, Lexington Ave., said she was opposed.
27
28 George Warner, 2658 Huron St., stated the project was premature and should not
29 be recommended. The area should be smaller and include only the city site.
30
31 John Kyslycian, Victoria St., stated that the issue should be tabled. There are
32 questions to be answered. The area is too large, should start smaller and with a
33 finite plan. The Burlington Northern line will be abandoned. The state and state
34 agencies, then county have first options on the railroad line. Light rail time-lines
35 are a guess. There are assumptions that have been made. The trailer park
36 ordinance (ss327c) is unclear. The county sheriff and state may ask to build a
37 building on the city center site, The county wants a countywide dispatch and
38 police facility with jail and courthouse. Buildings are not a source of pride.
39
40 Karla Miller, 2133 Avon St., said she was not allowed to speak at the Task Force
41 meetings. She is a VFW and American Legion member and bikes to work. She
42 likes Roseville as it is.
43
44 Tonya Lafollette, 2599 Lexington, asked the Planning Commission to think of the
45 people who this will impact.
46
Page 8 of 10
. '
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
No further comments were offered.
Chair Klausing closed the public hearing.
Chair Klausing noted that the council appointed Chair Klausing and Member Egli
to both committees. Member Egli stated that she has no problem with the
Member Egli and Chair Klausing participation.
Member Mulder noted there is no personal gain or conflict.
Chair Klausing noted that there could have been more public input. It is unclear
where additional meetings with the Task Force would have changed the
recommendation from them.
Member Olson stated that the designation in the Comprehensive Plan is too
premature. The Task Force meetings may help. There should be citywide
discussion.
Member Mulder explained that he was concerned that the Task Force
recommendation may be premature because a consensus is necessary. A greater
comfort level is needed. There are many myths that must be corrected.
Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Rhody, to continue the
public hearing to the July 14, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, after the Task
Force meetings.
Mr. Wietecki asked the commission what the expectation would be in July from
the Task Force? Member Mulder asked for more detail. Member Olson asked
what type of meeting will be held and who will be invited?
Chair Klausing asked if the hearing must be re-advertised if the district boundary
is enlarged to include the Central Park area,
Member Rhody explained that the "go slow" approach will allow residents to
meet with the Task Force.
Member Egli noted that more themes may appear and that it may reqUIre
amending the boundaries.
Member Wilke explained that the process and education on the topic must be
expanded. What does this project really do?
Member Cunningham described what other community center services may be.
The scope has expanded and impacts more neighborhoods. Should this project be
centralized or decentralized?
Page 9 of 10
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 7.
12
13
14
15 8.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 9.
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Chair Klausing explained that the Task Force must "sell the idea." Nothing new
may occur.
Member Rhody said this was/should have been a concept review with a 60-day
pause. There should be a firm proposal for the Commission to review.
Ayes: Wilke, Cunningham, Mulder, Olson, Rhody, Egli, Klausing
Nays: None
Motion Carried: 7-0
PRESENTATION S AND OTHER ACTIONS:
None
INFORMATION, REpORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
8a. Affirmation of Planning Commission By-Laws:
Continued to June 1999 meeting.
8b. Distribution of Updated Street Atlas
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 11 :00 p.m.
Page 10 of 10
..'
..i"'-: :.: ' ~.
<1z ~
M
-
"
"
t:..
o
o
.,..
"
""
""
~
a,
~~
~Z
.. ~ !:"
@~~
50{.\
en t~
88
"''''
P
.:!~
o
e
~
i
ri
t
.,
~ .5
::> ,C
";! ~
j '.Q,
VI
"8
tJ
a.
"0
"
~
C1)
<
(1)
r/l
::J
"'0
~
~
bJj
~
.~
ooj.ooI
r/l
. .....
'~
~
;...
C1)
.....
~
C1)
U
<)
.....
;>
.....
U
C1)
-
......
'S:
C1)
CI)
~
~
o
.0
.....
u
i
go,
o
~~
a_
~~
~~.
'" ~
00
>> '
'g
~
r-,; "i ;<
~...~'~ 6
!->'W!j~
V. ~ .
I,,(I"'!~
~i>
o
~,
Dr
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:
Police
Division:
I. Date: 4/30/99
2. Name of Building or Facility: Currently: City Hall, future: Public Safety/Police
3. Location of Building or Facility: On sitel off, either is acceptable
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 27 years
5. Size of existing building (square feet): Designated Police area is approx. 2,000
Sq. ft.
6. Size of existing site (acres): No idea
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: We currently have 25 work
stations, many of which are shared,
8. Employee parking (number): We use spaces that are shared by everyone coming
to City Hall, either employed or visiting. Security is at a minimum for police
vehicles.
9. ,Customer parking (number): unknown
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): Eleven parking spaces are
currently reserved for units at the Public Works garage. The garage houses less
than Y2 of our fleet.
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Indoor fireanns range,
holding cells, male and female locker rooms, interrogation/interview rooms,
records storage area to maintain privacy and security requirements, areas for
volunteer reserve units, training room, etc.
2
, Jio.. fA,
,\)0
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
Reserves, Explorers,
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: None
14. Structural conditional of building: good
15. Operational condition of the building: poor
16. Other issues: Limited space, data privacy issues (statutory), severe space
limitations for evidence and property room, female locker space, line up
limitations during changeover, prisoner handling and processing, space for
records, no meeting room space, to much sharing of work stations, storage for any
large items, zero technology for the training room.
3
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Police
Division:
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
17. Year the new building would be needed: ASAP, we are working with severe
space limitations now.
18. Size of new building (square feet): Approx. 25,000 Sq. Ft.
19. Size of new site (acres): Unknown
20. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 4 spaces for
records techs, 4 administrative offices, 2 CSO spaces, 1 space for reserve officers
(currently we have 24 on staff), 5 investigator work stations, 1 juvenile officer, 1
school liaison officer, 1 crime prevention officer, 1 operation Lts. Office, 3 spaces
shared by 6 Sgts., 6 spaces shared by 32 officers for reports etc. Approx total
29.
21. Estimated employee parking (number): 20
22. . Estimated customer parking (number): 20
23. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): 25 spaces
24. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Security keys when
building closed at night, Fireanns Range, cells, security needs, sally port for
bringing in prisoners, prisoner processing area, male/ female locker rooms, large
training room, interrogation/interview room.
25. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
None, but we could co-exist with the fire department and possibly consolidate
some efforts, which in the long run might save the city some money.
4
26. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: None
27. Unique structures needed within new building: Cell Block, Fireanns Range.
28. Unique operational improvements within new building: The center could be set
up with administration from both fire and police working from the center. I think
a new building would create a number of unique opportunities for the future.
29. Unique land/siting issues: Should be located for easy access by public and
employees.
30. Other issues: Security.
Q:\CITYCENT\CityCenterDistrictAssessments(042299).doc
5
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division:Accounting
I. Date: April 26, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility: City Hall
3. Location of Building or Facility: Civic Center Campus
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 22 years
5. Size of existing building (square feet): (Our share is 1,200 sq. ft.)
6. Size of existing site (acres):n/a
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: 7
8. Employee parking (number): 7
9. Customer parking (number): Shared 2-4
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.): n/a
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Attractively
decorated and designed. Very compact yet functional
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: 0
14. Structural condition of the building: Good
15. Operational condition of the building: Good
16. Other issues
2
(]\
~.O\
"'of
.
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division: Accounting
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed: 2005
17. Size of new building (square feet): 1,500 sq ft.
18. Size of new site (acres): nJa
19, Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 7-8
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 7-8
21. Estimated customer parking (number): 3-4 shared
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): nJa
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Designed for high
tech operation
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation: ?
25. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f) of your building or site: nJa
26. Unique structures needed within new building: none
27. Unique operational improvements within new building: Designed with
receptionist and department within the same work area for more efficient
operation
28. Unique land/siting issues: nJa
29. Other issues:
3
~
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Finance
Division: License Center
1.
Date:
April 26, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility Old City Hall.
3. Location of Building or Facility: Civic Center Campus (both)
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 50 Years?
5, Size of existing building (square feet): 2,500
6. Size of existing site ( acres): N/ A
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: 10.5
8. Employee parking (number):8
9. Customer parking (number):60
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): N/A
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: Server Farm with
Fibre Optic connections
12, Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f) of your building or site: $145,000
14. Structural condition of the building: Fair
15. Operational condition of the building: Fair
16. Other issues
2
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department:Finance
Division:License
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed: 2005
17. Size of new building (square feet):3,000
18. Size of new site (acres): Unknown
19. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 12
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 10
21. Estimated customer parking (number):70
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f): N/A
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation: A drive up for tabs
might be nice.
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
25. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: 150,000-
175,000
26. Unique structures needed within new building: N/A
27. Unique operational improvements within new building: Wired for technology
room as IS now.
28. Unique land/siting issues:
29. Other issues:
3
City of Roseville
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Parks and Recreation
Division:
I. Date: April 22, 1999
2. Name of Building or Facility: Roseville Activity Center
3. Location of Building or Faciiity: 2800 Arona St.
EXISTING FACILITY
4. Age of Current Building: 38 years (constructed 1961)
5. Size of existing building (square feet): 36,000
6. Size of existing site (acres): 14.7
7. Number of employees with work stations in building: II full time, I part time
. 2 Admin.
. 4 Programmers
. I intern
. 1 custodian
. 3 clerical
. 1 teen coordinator (part time)
/
8. Employee parking (number): 12 plus City van and occasional other city vehicles
len overnight.
9. Customer parking (number): 123
10. Interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.):
11. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation:
. Small gymnasium
. Teen center
. Community group storage space
2
')j- a.pI,
,\<f-
12. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
13. Revenue (annual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site:
$49,000 (lease approximately 4,800 s.f. to Moundsview Schools and ACCEL
Academy
14. Structural condition of the building: Very poor!
. Roof leaks
. carpeting must be removed because of mold c,oncerns
. windows are very energy in-efficient
. steam traps all leak and add to mold concern
15. Operational condition of the building: functions well for users but is very in-
efficient to operate.
16. Other issues
City of Rosevillc
City Center Task Force Study
Department Assessment of Facility Needs
Department: Parks and Recreation
Division:
NEW FACILITY AT CITY CENTER:
Assume you are asked to create a new building and site for your operation at City Center
(Public Works should look at the option of remaining or moving off of the City Center
Site):
NEW FACILITY
16. Year the new building would be needed:
. 2001 for Administrative offices and community space
. 2002 for aquatics and recreational space
17. Size of new building (square feet):
. Administrative offices 1,500 s.f.
. Recreational space 25,000 s.f.
. Aquatics 18,000 s.f.
. Community space 5,000 s.f.
. Art space 16,000 s.f.
3
. Community storage space 3,300 s.1'.
. Child care area 1,000 s.f.
. Snack bar 1,000 s.f.
. Indoor play area 4,2000 s.f.
. Indoor Winter Garden s.f. ????
NOTE: Square foot estimates DO NOT include, lockerrooms, mechanical,
circulation, storage, reception spaces
These estimates are also based on the middle range of ultimate facilities.
18. Size of new site (acres): 4 acres (ramped parking)
19. Estimated number of employees with work stations in building: 14
20. Estimated employee parking (number): 17
21. Estimated customer parking (number): 400 (includes current 225 spaces at
Skating Center)
22. Estimated interior city equipment parking (number or s.f.):
23. Unique features of building or site necessary for operation:
. Parks and Recreation Administrative Offices
. Community meeting space
. Leisure pool complex
. Recreational activity space including fitness area, gym, indoor playground
. Arts space
24. Other organizations/departments in your building, necessary for your operation:
25. Revenue (armual) from leases of portions (s.f.) of your building or site: $80,000
from recreational fees from pool and fitness areas. Potential additional funds
from leasing school or private accessory space.
26. Unique structures needed within new building:
. Parking ramp
. High ceilings for water slides in pool
. Gym with high ceilings for climbing structure and ball area
. Indoor playground
8 Indoor winter garden
. Storage bays for community group equipment
4
27. Unique operational improvements within new building:
. good connections between activities.
. Like concept of administrative offices, storage space and meeting rooms
being added to north end of OVAL.
28. Unique land/siting issues:
. Green space and outdoor assembly space.
. Good pathway connections
29. Other issues:
. Connections to Central park
. Private restaurant and physical therapy clinic added
Q: Ie [TYeENT\eityeenterDistrictAs~essmel1ts(042299) ,doc
5
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
December 18, 2000
Kathy Bennett
Community Development Department
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113-1899
Subject: Final Report for Comprehensive Planning Grant SG-97-157
Kathy:
Thanks for your phone call regarding the Comp Planning Grant, referenced above.
In a review of the file, I find a letter from Dennis Welsch from February 16,2000 and a packet
labeled Draft City Center master Plan and Development Strategy. However, I don't find a
Progress report form we asked to be completed. Thus, I am enclosing a fresh one, with hopes
that you can fill in the costs for the various aspects ofthe planning grant activities and return it to
me. At that time, I will process the final payment to the city, which will amount to $767.
As to the question about the "Cornerstone" project funded with Livable Communities
Development Account funds, any potential uses for the funds other than the original proposal
need to be reviewed in detail. Please contact Council staff, Wayne Nelson, at 651-602-1406 for
further information.
Thanks you and we'll be looking forward to your reply.
Uij (~
Sincerely,
1lf10 ~;:;;:
'1;U 7 ~
~~
651-602-~;6
Encl: Progress Report Form
Cc: Wayne Nelson
~t>J
00
\.
.\
\(s
230 East Fifth Street st. Paul. Minnesota 55101.1626
(651) 602-1000
Fax 602.1550
TOD/TIT 291.0904 Metro Info Line 602.1888
An Equal Opportunity Employer
"
T"i
(1)
...-;t
CD
8~
0.,..
C:!oc
oco\
C:!..o
0\ (A
o
~N
1::0
::I .
0.,..
Eoc
.. ...... 0\.
E.....\O
;:ju
"OU
U~._
~ 0
o i:
~.:o:"'"
U U
u u
..c:..c:
UU
~\
). ~~
,~ '--.) '~
~ ~,~
.~"~ ~
\'
\.
'"
(:)
z~
~o g
U._
u~ '"
~'5 9
ID
(\J
0", '"
"ou 8
~o ID
> ;::
(/J
0 ::;
c:
0 fi!
0
ul~ (/J
(/J
w
z
<<ioa (jj
::J
'0 00 ID
UJ .:0: ~
...J U :3
...J u .,.,
" ~ Ct:I-b8 ~
u"'" ~ ird
-e-'S,
en u~ 0 (X~&
==0=0
0 ~ZZN
a: ~S8~
u. -g -g '0 0::
0 uu;:>"",
>>..51""-
~
0
Purchase Order
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
ROSEVILLE
( ) -
MN 551131899
PO Number: 00001288
Vendor: 1141
ELLERBE BECKET
PO BOX 1450
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55485
Order Date: 09/22/2000
PO Status: Open
Deliver to: 2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113-1899
Shipping Instructions:
Comment:
Task Code: -
Type Code:
Quantity Price
1.00 6,985.0200
Amount Description
6,985.02 City Center Planning
Balance Due Account
6,985,02 415-01-64-00-0000-42-430000
..-------..............-
-----_.......----..-
TOTALS:
6,985.02
6,985.02
Purchase Order
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive * Roseville * Minnesota * 55113
651-490-2200 * TDD 651-490-220J/ n ~ l. I
X ~ vt~ bI.uUl-C\<YL
Signature:
tj
Title:
0-0
~~
ELLERBE .BECKET
~
Architects Engineers Planners
800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis, MN USA 55402-2014
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MR STEVEN R SARKOZY CITY MANAGER
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Remit to:
Ellerbe Becket
NW 8400
P.O. Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485-8400
Invoice
Invoice # 7491982001-L005
Invoice Date: 08/18/2000
Invoice Amount: $6,915.22
Terms: NET 30
Due Date: 09/17/2000
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Summary Invoice
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CITY CENTER ADD SERVICES Project 7491.9820.01.00
Amount Billed to Date:
$58,842.38
DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE
Through 08/1212000
$2,766.09 X 2.50
$6,915.22
AMOUNT DUE AND NOW PAYABLE
$6,915.22
PAYMENT DUE
SEP 1 7 2000
A service Charge of 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum pennlssible by law) Will
be payable on any past due account
~v
~(.
~\.
ELLERBE. BECKET
~
Architects Engineers Planners
BOO LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis, MN USA 55402-2014
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MR STEVEN R SARKOZV CITY MANAGER
.2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Remit to:
Ellerbe Becket
NW 8400
P.O. Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485-8400
Invoice
Invoice # 7491982001~X004
Invoice Date: 08/18/2000
Invoice Amount: $69.80
Terms: NET 30
Due Date: 09/17/2000
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Summary Invoice
EXPENSES - CITY CENTER ADD SERVICES Project 7491.9820.01.99
Amount Billed to Date:
$441.12
Total Travel:
Total Reproduction:
Total Repro Contracted:
Total Miscellaneous:
Total Reimbursable Charges:
$6.00
$43.82
$13.48
$6.50
$69.80
AMOUNT DUE AND NOW PAYABLE
$69.80
PAYMENT DUE
SEP 1 7 2000
A service Charge of 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum penniss/ble by law) Will
be payable on any past due account
o\)
~~'
August 21,2000
J\
\'
ELLERBE BECKET
~
oJ
Mr. Dennis Welsch, Director
Community Developmcnt Department
City of RoseviUe
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Kim N. Way, Principal
Vice President
Director of Planning
and Urban Design
Re: Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Commission No.; 7491.9820.01.00
Subject: #L005 and #X004
Dear Dennis,
800 laSalle
A venu e
Please find enclosed Ellerbe Becket's invoices L005 and X004 dated August 18, 2000 in the
amount of$6,915.22 (Professional Fees) and $69.80 (Reimbursable Charges), for the
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy. These invoices include time
and expenses through August 12, 2000 for the preparation of alternative concept plans for
the City Center based on the retention of the public work facility including; a new city
council chamber and 'winter garden', community center and public safety building. They
also reflect concept planning for the creation of a new recreation center on the east side of
Central Park adjoining the Prince of Peace Church. Meetings and presentations to the city
manager and department heads are also included in this invoice.
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
Telephone:
612,376,2026
Facsimile:
612,376-2552
E.mail: kim_way@
ellerbebecket,com
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
,""
()
o
~\\,
Ilerbe Becket, Inc.
m N. Way, Principal
Vice President
Director of Planning and Urban Design
..... .I ~.
W^.~~
6<~ W~ J~
~)
c: Dee Dee Spears
~rf
4;([
ELLERBE' BECKET
"
Invoice # 7491982001-X004
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Detail Schedule
EXPENSES - CITY CENTER ADD SERVICES Project 7491.9820.01.99
Vendor ID & Name
08464 - WAY, KIM
Direct Travel
Total Travel:
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Reproduction Inside
Total Reproduction:
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Direct Blue Outside
Total Repro Contracted:
08464 - WAY, KIM
Direct Mise
Total Miscellaneous:
Total Reimbursable Charges:
Total Dollars Transaction Description
$6.00 2000-08-11 Parking 1 Taxi! Bu
$6.00
$6,00
$2.82 ERS PLOTS MAY 00/7916
$10.28 ERS PLOTS 06/15/00 IBen Sporer
$20.00 ERS PLOTS 06/15/00 IJon Loidol
$0.28 ERS PLOTS 06/15/00 16789
$0.37 ERS PLOTS 06115/00 /Dave Plumb
$4.53 ERS PLOTS 06115/00/7916
$0.92 ERS PLOTS 06/15/00 /7916
$0.73 ERS PLOTS 06/15/00 /7916
$2.18 ERS PLOTS 06/15100 /7916
$1.71 ERS PLOTS 06300013669917916/Sp
$43,82
$43.82
$8.99 Alb/,May 001, 11x17.3 color'/SP
$4.49 Alb Jun 11x17.3 color, ISPORER
$13,48
$13.48
$6.50 2000-08-11 Mise - Other
$6.50
$6.50
$69.80
Page 1
u
~.\\ D
" ~
Q) Q)
U 1/1
... :J
:J.... ~.~
o c
J U) :J
... 0
Q) E
=m ~~
0"
i c. ,,~
m ...
~...e t
VI '0
~ .... roc
c O)::J
:J -'0
~ 0 ~()
E" 0
<( 5! .. L..
~ Q)-
~::> ....Q)
f ~~
~ C) -oeD
Q) 0
<() ....c
CO CO
E....
.9 ._ I/)
.... ,-
I/) If)
J!! LUI/)
1/1 -<(
0 c-
Q) CO
OQ) L.. 0
.... L.. 0
" m ::J...,j
CO ,SIC 0-
..... m 0
.... E
r-:. Q)
:0:1 O~
0) 1/1
. W ~ ~-
(!)
~
. Q)
- -I/)
c::: " ~ >-
CO
e ,SI ~
(!)~[ ci~
... '~ 'u :c L..
o CI) .- :J Q)
....CI)~I/I I-
't:o<C.!!! Qj 0
o a:: >- -
CO
~.... C 0 ....
c
a:: 0 <C ro L..
::J
CI)~ :t::....
CI)'- .- Q)
11)0 Ec:::
... ..c
01 en ::J
e c C/)
.- 1/1 -0 -
0.. c ..II:: ..-..
- 'iij 1/1---".. 20
c::: Em....... co
,- Q)I- a.
&. a:: '0 C
:0:;
'6 c
<(
:i " ()
~. I
+i 1/1
Q)..II:: Q)
'Q.I/I---".. -
co
Em....... 0
01-
0
1/1
Q)
:0:1
.:;
+:I _
u>-
<('Q.
cQ,
m m
ii:1;;
..II::J:
.......
0-
3:"iii
.....11::
o U
~~
m U
E-
E
:J
U)
i "E
I/) C Q)
o 10 E
Co c:: CD
~ 0)
~ ~ ~ ~
1ii [ .~ ~
C)~o Q)
,g~~~o
,!11 "t:I Q) a. (ij
x C 0 ~
~cu-cc:~~
ai :g, ~ .~ ~
:3~c75~&!
"0
C
10
...J
C
10
c::
~
~ ~
~o
(/) 0
C 5i:t5
Co C
~ 0 ~
t:: "t:I 10
o I/) 1ii c::
~t:=rJ)Q)cu
c~~::(;j
!!! ._ 10 Q) :>
~<(a.(/):>
"0
C
10
I/)
C
o
U
:c
I/)
.~
...,
0)
c
"g d)
.c-
.c 10
0)0
'Cii~
z!J
-0
o "C::
cUi
0'-
;0
10_
00
1;::0
:;::;.c.
00
Z(/)
.. JI
Q)'-
-
co
o
c
o
:0:;
Q)>-
Ci..c
E-o
o Q)
O"Q)
-00..
Q) E
.... 0
[0
:~ E 0
"E 0 0
<( LL. \:>'
0t~
February 16,2000
Mr. Terry Kayser
Planner, Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1633
RE: City of Roseville, City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
Dear Mr. Kayser:
The Roseville City Council has accepted and approved the City Center Task Force's
Concept Master Plan, Phase 1. The Task Force, with the assistance of Kim Way of
Ellerbe Becket, have finalized their "charge" from the City Council with the submission
of this Report.
Enclosed is a copy to serve as the Final Report toward the grant which was received by
the City from the Metropolitan Council.
If you have any questions, please call me at 651.490.2232.
Sincerely,
O/"O~.OI
~
~ 'J ~ m~
~. ~~ A.Qavu it 7
~ -" ~
~~
p~
Dennis P . Welsch
Community Development Director
City of Roseville
Ene: City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy
City Center Study Supporting Demographics
\\ Victoria\CommDev\CITYCENT\MetCouncilSubmiual ]hasel.doc
\~.(jJ
~\J
ELLERBE BECKET
JIlt
Architects Engineers Planners
800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis, MN USA 55402~2014
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MR STEVEN R SARKOZY CITY MANAGER
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Remit to:
Ellerbe Becket
NW 8400
P.O. Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485-8400
Invoice
Invoice # 7491982000-L003
Invoice Date: 05/14/1999
Invoice Amount: $6,698.29
Terms: NET 30
Due Date: 06/13/1999
ELLERBE B+CK,,:,INC.
summa11nVOlce
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. c,.... , TER Project 7491.9820.00.00
/contract Arr-' 4,800.00
$44.800.00
....~)
-----
--r----
~ .. $6,698.29 \V
-------- cYF- \(
r \",q
t.o\/V
DIRECT PERSONNE(
Through 05/08/1999
$4,246.92 X 2.50
v1\ko/ j
fi1\~ .
LES~
AMOUNT OUt.
'-'
~9
A service charge or 1.5% per month (but notbxceadlng the maximum permissible by law) will
be payable on ahy past due account
~o....
{;,r-o
f~ 3 \\9
ELLERBE BECKET
,;.
May 14, 1999
Mr. Dennis Welsch, Director
Community Development Department
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
RoseviIle, MN 55113
Re: Roseville City Center Master Plan andlDevelopment Strategy
Commission No.: 7491.9820,00.00
Kim N. Way
Vice President
Urban Design
Direttor
Subject: Invoices L003 and X003
Dear Dennis:
800 laSalle
Avenue
Minneapolis.
Minnesota
55402
Telephone:
612.376-2026
Facsimile:
612-376-2552
E-mail: Kim_ Way@
ellerbebecket.com
Please find enclosed Ellerbe Becket's Invoices Lb03 and X003, dated May 14, 1999 in the
amount of $6,698.29 (Professional Fees) and $9~.76(Reimbursable Charges), for the
Roseville City Center Master Plan and Develop~ent Strategy. These invoices include
time and expenses through May 8, 1999 for tim~ spent in preparation and Task Force
Meeting #9, meetings with staff, preparation of1the City Center Concept Alternatives and
ongoing project review and management.
Please note that we have now exceeded our Ph* I contract amount by $3,919.00. All
professional time spent on the project will be billed on an hourly basis plus reimbursable
expenses, until a new contract is agreed. The $~,919.00 plus any additional professional
time since May 8, 1999 will be billed during th~ next billing cycle in June.
If you have any questions or need additional intbrmation please do not hesitate to call.
c. Michelle Rothwell
~
bI '=>/ft~
~ ~Q\ec.V ~"
~{coc S.
, E& ~.
Sincerely,
.
N. Way, Vice President
ban Design Director
~d\,
t'#'
~ '
Community Development Department
December 18, 1998
Mr. Terry Kayser
Office of Local Assistance
Metropolitan Council
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Mn. 55101-1626
Re: Midpoint Progress Report on Roseville 1998 Local Planning Grant #SG97-157
Dear Terry:
This letter and attachments are intended to serve as the mid-point report on the City of Roseville
Local Planning Grant ($7,670) for the City Center Planning Process. This process is an
implementation section of the 1994 City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan. The City Center
Planning Process will eventually be placed in the City's plan as an implementation strategy within
Book 2 of the Plan. The Plan itself is being updated with new projections (but no changes in policy
content) for submission to the Metropolitan Council by December 31, 1998.
A Task Force of 13 residents was appointed by the City Council in later August, 1998. Since August
they have held study meetings each month and estimate that phase one of the study - a city center
recommendation- will be submitted to the City Council in July, 1999.
Consultants Work (Matching Grant Dollars):
To date the City Center Planning Process, with the assistance of consultants Kim Way of Ellerbe-
Becket and John Carpenter ofTLG, has completed the background study of the demographics, the
site, and the market for a city center. Four Task Force meetings have been held and a series of
interviews with leaders in the community have been completed. The Task Force also spent
November 7, 1998 on a tour of community centers within the Metro area. Through December 18,
1998 the City has paid $31,154.86 to Ellerbe-Becket and $3,560.00 to TLG.
City Staff Support Work:
The City department heads have spent time (estimate 4 hours each) preparing infonnation,
interviewing, and listing needs of each of 8 departments. In addition, Community Development
Staff have spent an average of 12 hours (2 department heads) preparing for and de-briefing after
each of 5 Task Force Meetings. I estimate the total time of this activity at 92 hours with a salary
rate of $35.00/hour for a total of $3,270. Staff support time for preparing mailings, agendas,
1
~
~\\O
'l/-
'",
--
background research, and GIS mapping is estimated at 120 hours at a rate of$25.00 per hour for a
total of $3,000.
Future Work:
The Task Force, consultants and staff will meet at least monthly through July, 1999, An interim
report will be made by the Task Force to the City Council in January, 1999 and May, 1999. Public
hearings on the concept and change in the Comprehensive Plan will be held in the fall of 1999 for
inclusion in the annual update of the plan for year 1999.
I hope this explanation and the attached billings and activity agendas are adequate explanation of
the project to date, Please feel free to contact me if additional information is necessary,
Sincerely,
CITY of ROSEVILLE
Dennis P. Welsch (651-490-2232)
Community Development Director
Attachments: Billings, Agendas, Project Outline.
Q:\CITYCENT\grant application report.doc
2
, '
0000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0
"tJ . . . . . . . . . .
CO E.- :3
0.'" CO
......1"'1
CO 11'\ ~
......00 ..0000000000 oD 1"'100 1"'1 0. 0. 0.
N tl")OOOOOODOO 1"'1 1"'100 1"'1 -0 -0 -0
OJ . . . . . . . . . .
U /'0- /'0- 0- 0- oD oD oD
c: 00 CO .- .- 0 0 0
OJ OJ OJ '" .... .... , , 11'\ 1/'\ 11'\
+-'EU>
"'.~ '" '" .- .- .-
o...a. CO ~ 1"'1 1"'1 1"'1 1"'1
, . , ,
U
c:
OJ
c:
::>
0000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0
u;~~~~q~~qq 1/'\ 000 0 11'\ 11'\ 1/'\
0 N N N N N
... . 1"'1 1"'1 "" '" '"
>- '" '" "" '" '"
"tJ
OJ
L.
OJ
..a
E
:3
u
c:
W
c-OQOOOOOOO 000 0 .-
1/'\000000000 '" 000 0 '" '" '"
. . . . I . . . . '"
"" '" '" ""
.r:: 0 C; C; C; 0
+-' N' N' N' N'
::E: N
.-
'-
L.
::>
U
..0000000000 oD 1"'100 '" 0. 0. 0.
COOOOOOOOOO CO 1"'100 '"
. . . . . . . . . ..;
.... .... 0. 0. r::! ....
'" '" .- .- /'0- /'0-
... .- .- .-
'" '" ,
0 ::> ;;:; ;;:; ;;:; ;;:; ;;:;
a. ...
w u
'" ...::
w 0
'" ...
::> >-
...
0 000 0 , 0 0
:z: 0000000000 ' 0 0
W 0000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0
a.
X +-'
W OJ
...... U>
W "tJ
::> ::>
:z: CO
w
> "tJ
W OJ
'" "tJ
c:
OJ
E
<<
0000000000 0 000 0 0 0 0
+-' 000'0000000 0 000 0 0 0 0
OJ
U>
"tJ
:3
!XI
'"
c:
.
'" ,
,
L. ,
0 ,
,
,
.
Vi
W
00 '" '"
0. W ::>
...... > ...
<0
.- '" C
...... c :z:
N t> Vi '" w
... Vi ww a.
w :z: w ",U ... X Vi
0 ~ wU :;>- ::z: uJ W ...
... C ::E:- ...> w'" U> '" U
0< W> uo< ::E:::E:... .Jw ::> w
<0 a. >'" ::>w Wc..% ...::-w ... ....,
0. Ow ",Vi ..._ uJ "'.JU> 0
...... >- ",Vi I- <.n::>::E:'" W a.. "" 0 '"
.... a. "''''...... >-CJWCJ Zo...WI-- "" c..
0 ::E:.J ::> (l)W>::Z '" UJ::::)Q..:=> w en
...... U _c(CJOolSt-- 0- ... C7cnXO a. QJ >-
N :z:ZW 0 :;;;e:.......o::t-- % W X L. ... '"
W .- , '" OO-:z:cn-'~O ~:z W 0<':> '" W :J ...
.J w O-(I)<CC1 ~-cn:E<C ::E: OZI--O::: ... U 0
.J ... ocn--IZCJOt-W-....J W O-(I)W .J I-
;: "tJ Z .ool---I-23CC-' a. > ol--Wu.. ...:: 'U '" q, .000Lb
0 w --4"UJ~wa- c.:JUO! 0 eoc:C~cn '" c: w "tJ
w u U)"Ou..wu...J~w--ww '" coo:::wz w QJ ... c:
'" L. Q1oo>cn_D::I--Q!::Z:::Z:UJ a. ow.....c:e % C. "" '"
0 OJ '" La c:rr::c_~c:c_ct:WI--O:: ::E: a.ZIX W >< W L.
IX a.. ,-~"Q..<:Em~U)->O~ ..0-1-- '" W U '"
.......... ...
u. OJ to- 0.0 000 0 Lon f'-.- 0 0 ,...,. a.O 0 0 \~'\
0 .r:: ""O<lJCOOOLnLn~oaO QJOOO
... "'Oc:coooooaoooa cOOO
>- c: OJ ..........
... L. :::>a. 0""" oooa 0 ON,.,..,.,.., ...."'0
0 u.)( 1"1'1""'-..1'11'1 LnLnU'\LI"\LI'\ LI'\ N....oD
<..J u. W ....,......:t...j.....t-..:t~~....,...:t'-.3' ............
6:30 p.rn. I.
6:40 p.m, II.
6:50 p.rn. III.
7:35 p.m.
8:20 p.m.
v.
8:50 p.m.
VI.
CllY CENTER TASK FORCE
MEETING 41=5
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1998
6:30 - 9:00 p.m., CITY HALL
AGENDA
Call to Order
Review of November 19 Meeting Notes
Review of City Center Components Discussion
A VISion Statement Discussion
B. Primary Use Discussion
IV.
Review and Discussion of Study Area
A Existing Conditions
B. Opportunities and Constraints
C. Not likely to change. possibility of change, desired change
Program (Uses) and Site Integration
What are the options for fitting the program (uses) within the study
area?
Next Steps
Next Meeting: Thursday. January 21, 1998
9:00 p.rn.
VII. Adjourn
Q:\Cl'fYCENl'\A9md (12.17).doc
Attachments: VISion Discussion; Noles from IIJ9.98 meeting
~q,
1\-
\~\
~
t.J
!:II:
o
1.1.
::.I:
11'\
<:
....
CI:
~
....
z
~
t.J
~
o
~
...
...
;;;
~
{/'\
o
CI:
or.
.:
:~
u
'"
.~.
c:
"
E
E
o
U
"'0
c:
'"
c:
,2
~
~
u
OJ
::r:
~
~-d
~ '5
~ .~
","'0
.:::0
- 0
~...r::
..., u
c: <r.
~-5
~ '~
o 0..
;:c
g ~
'.;J c:
5 ~
uo..
~
101
..
e
1.1.
.III:
III
~
....
...
GI
..
c::
~
I"J
~Ic::
't
~
~
~
c:
...,
c: "
,3 ~
'" no
OJ '"
... ...
u '"
OJ no
... OJ
1:11):>
c: 0
"'0 E
:J 0
U...,
c: ~
g,g
b.o~
,~ -s
'"
....J
015
u
~
~=
a-. '"
-x
a'c
:0
'" .
..c .
E E
'" C.
:>0
00
zo;
>.1
.gj E
'" c.
"'0
"M
..c: ..
E->D
c:
.2
~
'"
....
u
~
'"
'"
::s
tU
...,
'"
~
~
'"
...
~
c:
OJ
u
...
'" 0
~ 'c
c.~
E-c
'" c:
u '"
1:: ~
OJ u
EE
c: 0
... ...,
~ .~
o ...
~.~
",-c
"'-
-c 0
o 0
E-5
'" '"
~ ...:
'" ~
'" c:
... '"
u u
>.
C
"
o
u
~
'5 ~
"'=
:u ~
Oc
~ ~
u '"
~ t'
.c",
.- ...
u,e
'-=-
'" 1
c~
~ B
~ ~
E '~
c: '"
... ...
"'-c
~ ~
1:11)...
OJ '"
t>J).....
... c
'" '"
....J u
N
<
Q
Z
~
~
<
~
'"
....
'"
~
u
...
.S
c:
'"
~
...
~
c
'"
U
c:
.3
'"
OJ
...
U
OJ
ex::
-5
'~
..c
"
..c: .;
...
'" 0
'Z -5
c: c:
i; '"
'en t:
~ 'c:a
cE
,- '"
'" '"
C bf)
i; .5
, '"
..c: "
,!:p 0
..c:X
'" ...
~ .9
'" C
... '"
u'J)
~
~
<r.
OJ
"
'>/)
--
'"
...
'"
..c
E
OJ
E
.....
o
c:
o
'Z
~
-a
2
..., ..-:.
.5:>2
__ u
... '"
'" ...,
"'0 '"
c~
o ....
..., ,-
=1
'"u
u~
....:
E
c.
~
~
:r.
:.i. Q.i
~ 3
u .~
c: E
~b
E-o;
~ .~
c ~
'" 0
... c.
-c
'"
:J
o
...
'"
...
'"
..., u
'" ,-
'" ...,
OJ~
..c:..c:
..., ...,
(; '"
z ~
OJ c:
1: ~
OJ~
'" c:
~8
OJ --
C:"QJ
xo
...;X
OJ '"
C '"
:J ~
Uc
'" OJ
~u
~ i:
~ 0
I: .~
o ~
U u
OJ OJ
~ex::
OJ '"
... or,
W ::s
:>2
U
~<X>
",a-.
~;:
--
-5-
~:;
-:;:-
'"
or.
~
z
to/)
c:
...,
'"
'"
",:2:
~ ....
o "
Z 0
bf)E-
,::; ~
t~
:2:r..:
N ...
N.E
~ E
..c '"
o :>
..... 0
OZ
...... ......
o 0
~ ~
OJ OJ
';;: ';;:
OJ '"
::r:ex::
rr...; ~
gu -:-~
'Z g, (; :>2 :;
g-E"'-?j~
~ .- ] 't t)Jj
~ ""0 ~._ I::
~c;~~~~.
g. ~ ~ ~ -5 ~ ~~
;> >. Co.i QJ .- :::I O"J
E''5C:~~~~
'-...... E c ~ 0
~ 0 ~ ~ g 0 :u
>'~~o~~1o-o
'"CCbJ)~.-,IClI~
3 '" 01: " .~ I:
","'_::oEOJ
~co"Oc"'O u
-5'>/)"',,~~c
t....., c:: c: ...r::'- 'u
0;E.'tc!"'€'"
~ .- "'0 0 QJ """
~ c c:: "Z ~ ~ =QD
'" i; 0 g- >.:::! ,5
-5 '-: ~ no 1J .....; ~
:5 Qj ~ .5 t) ~ '(ij
.... -g ..c .~ -c 0 ~ :
~E..c:E..E--~
~ ~ ~ ~] $! .5 ]
e "b ~.s ~ 'B :g ~
c. U ,5 ~ .::S '5 E
~.g ~ ,5 ~ -g,c ...
..., OJ - E ..c: ,- ..
~ -:] ~ ._ ~ c ~ -5
~<::",c:i2<::",O
OJ .
c< cO \.,;
-
-
E
c.
~
...0
E
o
l!;.
J:
>.
to:
~
E
:2
-c
I:
"'
OJ
U
~
~
<r-
oo
t.
~
tij
>,
..c
bf)
-5
'"
OJ
~
...
"
o
E-
'"
..c:
...,
'-
o
c.
"'
U
..
ex::
:>
E
c.
o
N
,:..:
~
';;;
""", CJ
~] -5
..c: '" 0
..... '11 ...,
"'O~-::J
;.av.l~
~ ~ ?j
o ..., i:
X '" I:
". -5 8
'" >,-c
~ b/) i:
::1 ~ C':I
o ~ ~
><v.I~
,- '11 C.
E..c: '-
b.Q"" 0
.5 ~ ~
~ ~ I:
'" ..... '"
... '" '"
OJ c: '"
.5 ~]
~ t'~ ~
E ~ tJ
'" 0 '"
-5~~C'~~
~ ~ .E -.,J c:J
QJ QJ <<I ,- .c
~t:~a""
o ..., E ~
2: '" E '"
~~8~
..c:
U
to:
'"
C
o
'" ".
.."'0
..... '"
o C
I: ...
-c ~
c-
'" '"
.:3 g
~ ~
E-
E~
o ...,
U '"
~ ~
OJ ~
'"
...
_ t'C ctI
'~~ ~
:2 .\. ;\.
..\.
".
'"
i:
no
'm
'"
-c
Q/)
i:
'C
:J
-c
c
'"
>.
C
".
><
OJ
0..
E
o
~u
'" ...
c '"
OJ C
w OJ
>,U
::= >.
U .-::
"'u
= '"
.;;: ......
'" 0
'" '"
~t:
'0 ~~
Q/)..... <<I
cE:?;
'E c E
~ 8..:2
EE-c
~ 8 ~
;:;~~
c ..... ....
't~&
-c.....~
0.='"
o;c:~
x;;:~
;.\.
:>
C
0..
o
l!)
,:..:
>.
'"
:?;
E
:2
-c
c
'"
..
U
...
o
r.r..
.><:
'"
'"
E-
'"
0.
'"
U)
....
><
..
z
s:
E
0.
..."')
U'>
a;;
E
o..Ec
o c.. ..g
~ 0 :=
: ~ j
C!' . _
~ ~ ~
a-. - ,
~N
..c t:'
E '"
'" ::s
U c
~~
>.>.
'" '"
"'0 -c
'" '"
... ....
::s ::::
..c:..c:
E-E-
u;
~
i:
.....
~ c
:2: :;
..., 0
~ :a
Z <::
:>
E
0..
o
:; ~~
fl\.'
\..:
\.'(
"
~
2 'CIVIC CENTER DRIVE · ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113
--.-' (612) 490-2200
V
E
N
D
o
R
LAWRENCE GROUP
510 FIRST AVE N
SUITE 303
MPLS MN 55403
SHIP VIA:
F,O,B.
TERMS :
ANALYSIS
PURCHASE ORDER
DATE DATE REQUIRED
11/13/9 00/00/0
VEND~:>R T2 528
NO..
PAGE
~ (
1
P
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
ROSEVILLE MN 55113
T
o \.
ORDERED BvI?ENN~S ~ELSCH
P,O, TYPE COnflrnung
REQ, NO,
r
3,560.000(
TOT Al COST
I
I
)
UNIT PRICE
CaMP PLANNING AND CIVIC CENTER TAS1
FORCE I
260.056.100.4~0:000
3560.00
Total:
------------
------------
3,560.00
BY
( (1 CITY OF ROSEVILLE
/ !!,
"--
~
~
1001
I
I
I
QUANTITY
t. "'. ~
i
i
, I
I
I
i
I
I
I
, '-..../
,ENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS:
1 WE ARE EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL TAXES ~
Z, SH()W PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER ON ALL PACKAG~ CORRESPONDENCE
j PREPARE SEPARATE INVOICE FOR EACH PURCH; ER
I, PREPAY ALL TRANSPORTATION CHARGES
;, NOTIFY us A~,~~~~~.~~~~~~~ :~,~~E SHIPM UE:~~~ .."CO
PUQCHAS''JG ,~GENT
~
I
~~
w
()
a:: 00
0 en
u.. en
~ 'I(-
tn ......
<( w a::
I- -I W
a:: :) en
w e :i:
I- W
Z :I: W
W () >
() tn 0
~ a:: z
:) >'
() 0 <(
W l- e
-I a::
...J :)
.....
> <(
w en
tn
0
a::
J!!
z
w
2;
I
~l
#~Il
0::: "C'O 0
:i:U C Q) ~:5
Q) Z - ro C>.....; 0'-
.- (/) (/) ro I=:i: ~
: ~ E .~ oX: .... (1) C> X (/) "C Q)
'"C 0 :!:: (ij .9 E .S Q) ::J en Q) "E
z C ~ 1; a.. (/) 1:l."C C. C. Q) t3 Q)
~<.','. ::J...... U ...... '::J- "C E E U ::J U
gtO"" ...;-"'" ro u:::....
I;:,~ ~ ~2 ffi :~ "C Ou ~ 15 Wc ~
...:. ro......c Q) C
~I ~ ~ .~ ~ :3 !~ Q) 2 ~ 5' 8 E
10::J E c~ iJ Ea3~...."E E
.'u. c.E m 0 6)0 U (/) Q) ro 0
,r:;:)) .~8""'_c~~u~Q):50u
'i\1'it - U ,^ 0 .-- ......- U 0 -
(_ (/) .... In:o:; 1= (/) C.- (/) - 0
jlf~1 0 -:.E g> ro ::J ::J ::J "C Q) ~ C
C. 0 0 "C:o:; Q) E .;: E C "C 0 0
';<;, o_,g Q) Q) U F Q) E 8 ::J:o:; t
"1;~~ 1.0 U (/) Q) Q) c5 .r: 0 Q) g ro 0
,,;t'%. C') (/) ::> E 0::: (.) I-- U (/). _ Z c..
, .w'~
1,,(.
; :~d':? LU
z~J. <( ....J
2ilz:::!
(;!J,o>
i=:o:::W
<(i\<(CJ)
0000
G)toO:::
~ex:> ~
,:;;,i,N I--
'. CJ)
Z
1.0 >-
ex:> -....J~
'w~o:::
z>o<(
o<(oa..
o 0:::
~ cc
~
<(
1.0
N
ex:>
ZUX
>->W
....J-....J
~Ua..
o~~
00:::0
O:::<(U
cca..
W
:J~O:::
__w
>>1--
w-z
CJ)I--w
oUu
0:::<(
.... ....
(/) _ Q)O
..... 2 Q)"C0 "E-u
ro .ro Ecc Q)(/)=
:5 Q) ~ 'E: :0:; ro 0 en U "E .g.S U
Q) - c. c. ~"C:g E (/) ~ c. ro .;;:
..... c. 0 .- C 0 (/) .::: .... 1::: 'u-
"C'- ro Q) ....J ro 2 0 Q) (/) 0 Q)
~~~.r::; "C-.........cQ)_u'O
~ 'u..... C"C (/) ......... Q)-
U ro .- "5 _ Q) C ~ 1+= 0 0 1:::
::J C :i: _ '" 0 .- "C ..... E
.= 0 (/) _.... >-:Q U C Q) ......_ Q) ro
(/) .... ro ->- 0 :!:: > ::J ..... C ..... C> C.
C Q)......:!::- .U o"Cc E U::J Q) ro (/)
0..... "" U Q)........ ::J 0 E (/).-
U 53~.... u.9'O c.ro E.= U 0::J >-
>-UoQ)roro >-Q)O(/)(/)(/)....~
- -..... c..... t3 ..... .... U C .- Q) .-
:i:>-Q)c(/)Q)Q)u::J"Co"C"C.Qu
Q) :!:: a; ~ (/) c.'O' t3 C U (/) C E ~ .
CC _ co.... '::JroQ)Q)roQ) x
::J "C - .- ", ..... (/).... E > ..... Q)
- E Q) ro u. ~ (/) ..... ro .- ~ E '-
~Eg>o>"E~"EQ)~c:o:;C>~ I ~Ec.
.... .- 0 C .- C .... Q) Q) "C C> C Q)
ro 0 Q) in U ..... o:!:: 1: :;:;:-= C .- 0 .... 0
....J U .Q \....J 1+=..., U. ._ ...... ....J ro (/) C ro u
0::: w
W ->
>00
<(<(0:::
WO<.9
~~W
...-~....J
1.O<(a..
0>..]<(
~ ~
~
<(
o
N
0>
W
6~0:::
o:::zw
<.9=>1--
w~z
....J~w
a..OU
<(u
~
I I
I-- _I--
o=>o=>
1.00>0
(()~....J~
C')>-cc>-
....J ....J
a.. a..
~
<(
o
...-
o
...-
FWw~o:::
::>~CJ)zw
Ol--w=>1--
~wz~z
>-u.I--~W
....J:::iU.OU
a.. U
d\~
\' ,,-
~
z
w
:IE
:IE,
8'
e
;.<
>:i
~
,..',. L....
Z'O
(!).~
eo
Q:'+:J II)
_a.:J
'OZ.. 0 a.
Oi,"5 E
tn. 0 ro
W' >- u
~; ro ~
< II)'C
Q) :J
" ~ E
mE
Q) 0
u.u
I
I
I
~>- Q) ~ ~ ~
o :!: ~ ~ >- a. .~
t: C ~ '0 2 .c E .S2 en E
ro :JE +-' Q) C "0 Q) ro .~ .~ -g '+-
"0 IDQ) e> xU:!:ro 0
Q) E Q).~ u+-, Q) ro Q) U C C
Eo.... en '>. ~ .~ - +-' -g C en 0 .-
'+- U Q) C .~' Q) +-' ro ~ en .- a. Q) :;::::; en
o "OQ)Ca.ro Q)Q)ro~ouroQ),
Q) "0 en X :J 0 Z .!a "E .c Q) .c::;.c ~ .... a. 15..
+-'2cQ)E"Ox+-'Q)Q)mQ)lI)enoa.roQ)
roroO E ....-u.c>.c - Uu
en .... U en co...... .- +-' C> C 0 en C
Q) en 0 0 ro._ Q) Q) en c.. C.!: 0 U Q) 0
Q) a..- E U "0 C/) .c >.- .- en:;::::; C Q) U
e> 0 en 0 Q).c '':;: 'en .c Q) "E :J ro .- .... -
ro"O.c"O~~ro~cQ)~~Q)~~~enc
-c~cQ)>+-'c ~IE~u> ~
roro roEo~ro.cQ)e"Oa.en~o-go
en"O~- enrou....oQ)OQ) .cro-
._ Q) Q) (/) U .- ,.... '':;: a..c x -"0 () (.1) C
enc-Q)=en~Q)EC'E-Q):J=enen~
.- > C C').c Q) E .- > U .c .- Q) 0
.c>Q)ro:J.c.c o"O,+-Q)~:J.cen"O
~ 0 U _ a. ~ +-' <( u W 0 u.: a. ~ :J =
~; ~g~ ~~
'I; _Z<(Z oC/)
;:;:....w.. 0 a > a ...... <(
lV"i 0 L- L- CD rv I
~iCDr-wr-CDL.L..
~i.q-W....JW......~O
CEr......Z::>Z ~-
c. ZOZ <(~
~CD~ Cl.O
<.V
LO LO
.q- ......
. .
0 ......
...... ......
,.{
[l.;;'* 0
j+~ ~ >< >~~
5o~ OZW
~-a.. ~:J~
w>~ :2Z
zOo C/):2W
<:.Z 0 <(aO
,ji~ IO
, 0
u.
o _~
....JC/)::s
C2~~
I-~a
go~
...... a..
N
:2
a..
o
o
N
......
I~~
~ZW
a:J~
~:2Z
<(:2W
000
o
I..,jW <(
g~<(O O~
Oe~~ ZW
~....-W~ <(W
Oo~u. : 0
CDOZo><(OZ
Zt-ZO>ZLO<(
ol';-w~o ~
WOW U.
:2
a..
LO
~
N
......
I....J
~<( ><
OZC/)W
~ZW....J
OW~a..
CD~::s:2
ZW 0
00 0
W'
:2
a..
LO
......
......
Ow
Zo
<(Z
~ <(
o~
LOU.
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
MEETING #3 - TOUR
Saturday, November 7,1998
7:45 a.m. -1:30 p.m.?
MEET AT ARONA COMMUNITY CENTER
2800 Arona
AGENDA
Saturday Morning, November 7th:
The purpose of this tour is to show the Task Force examples of public and private efforts to
create "city centers" within the Metro Area. A mix of uses, facilities, and ownership (public and
private) arrangements will be toured. Kim Way and Bob Bierscheid will provide the Task Force
with an introduction to each site and ask for reactions from the Task Force.
The bus tour of sites, as shown on the attached outline will begin sharply at 8:00 am. However,
the Arona Community Center will be open early (7:45am) so that you may take a "strolling"
tour of the existing Roseville facility.
The tour will include a number of meetings as well as two or three "drive-by" opportunities.
Dress comfortably and informally. Coffee and snacks will be available on the bus.
In the week prior to the bus tour, the City Center Task Force is encouraged to individually or in
car pools inspect the nearby Community Centers in New Brighton, Shoreview, Maplewood,
North St. Paul, and the White Bear Lake Public/Private downtown.
Attachments: Q:\CITYCEN1IAgenda (I i -7),doc
d\, <\
1\.
~
CITY CENTER TASK FORCE
MEMBERS:
KEITH WIETECKI. CHAIR
2428 FARRINGTON CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 481-7890 (H)
905-2259 (0)
Fax: 905-1508
E-mail: keith.h.wietecki@Emasters.com
LOIS SINN LINDQUIST, VICE-CHAIR
2706 WESTWOOD @ MacKUBIN
ROSEVILLE. MN 55113
Phone: 628-9844
Fax: 636-7334
E-mail: lois@resolution-inc.com
PATRICIA JOHNSON
2986 MILDRED DR
ROSEVILLE. MN 55113
Phone: 633-1891
Fax: 633-1891 (call)
E-mail:
PEGGY EGLI
705 HEINEL CIRCLE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 486-0177 (H)
625-5215 (0)
Fax: 625-1268
E-mail: peggv@biosci.cbs.umn.edu
DONALD ANDERSON
948 W. CO. RD. D
ROSEVILLE, MN 55126
Phone: 484-6039
RICHARD A. BATES
2616 NO, FAIRVIEW AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 633-3062
Fax: 332-9013
E-mail: dbates@email.hga.com
PERRIE N. HEITLER
459 W. CO. RD C
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 481-8552 (H)
482-9933 (0)
Fax: 484-9189
THOMAS JOHNSON
1678 LYDIA AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 628-9084 (H)
893-3832 (0)
Fax; 835-7296
JOSEPH SMITH
895 TRANSIT AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 484-6223 (H)
415-2203 (0)
Fax: 482-9727
Cell: 790-3979
SCOTT J. BERGS
534-2 LOVELL AVE.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 482-1505
Fax: 335-1657
E-mail;sb1419@leonard.com
ANN M. HERMES
2796 GAL TIER ST.
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone; 481-8704
Fax: 486-8601
E-mail: LadyFlame96@Tuno.com
CRAIG KLAUSING
447 ROSE PLACE
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Phone: 490-9514 (H)
296-3952 (0)
Fax: 205-4200
E-mail:
Craig.Klausing@courts.state.mn. us
JAN VANDERWALL
395 W. CO. RD. C
ROSEVILLE. MN 55113
Phone: 484-6555
Fax: 483-2534
E-mail:
Tan.V anderwall@dc.roseville.K12.rnn.us
Dated: November, 1998
Q.\CITYCENl'\CITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEMBERS,doc
O\~
\\'
..--,
6:30 p.m. I.
6:40 p.m. n.
6:50 p.m. ill.
7:10-7:50 p.m.
Rt
CTTY CENTER TASK FORCE
MEETING #2
Thursday, October 22,1998
6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., City Hall
AGENDA
Call to OrderlIntroduction of new members/gUest sign-in.
Review of October 8,1998 Meeting Notes
Recap ofProgramlResponsibilities/Events (Kim Way)
o Additions to Focus Group by Task Force
(from original handout)
CJ Report on Interview Progress
IV. Demographics/Background/Maps (John Carpenter)
~
7:50-8:00 p.m.
v.
8:00-8:40 p.m.
Maps of the Study Area
Is this the correct study area? (Task Force to decide)
o Comprehensive Plan Map
o Existing Land Use Map
o Pathways and Neighborhoods
VI. What are the component parts of a City Center Complex
(Kim Way)
8:45 p.m.
vu. Next Steps (Task Force and Kim Way)
Meetings: November ---J 1998, 6:30 p.m.
December ---J 1998,6:30 p.m.
Tour? when, where?
(To be determined by the Task Force)
[please bring your 3-month calendars with you)
9:00 p.m.
VIII. Adjourn
Attachments: Meedng Notes; Maps of Study Area
Q:\CTIYCENI\Agenda (I O.22)doc
,,-... ,
~
,.
0?r
\J'
~
r-'.
~
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER
TASK FORCE MEETING #1
Thursday, October 8,1998
6:30 p.m. - 8:45 p.m.
AGENDA
I. WelcomelIntroductions 6:30 - 6:50 p.m.
II. Task Force Charge/Ground Rules (Kim Way) 6:50 - 7:00 p.m.
III. Work Program and Schedule (Kim Way) 7:00 -7:15 p.m.
IV. 1998 Roseville Citizen Survey (Steve Sarkozy) 7:15 -7:35 p.m.
,~
v. Roseville: Existing Conditions and Potential Projects
, ; (Dennis Welsch) 7:35 -7:50 p.m.
VI. What is a City Center? (Kim Way) 7:50 - 8:15 p.m.
YD. What does Roseville City Center Mean to You?
(Kim Way) 8: 15 - 8:40 p.m.
VDI. Next Steps 8:40 - 8:45 p.m.
NEXT MEETINGS:
Thursday, October 22,1998
Thursday, November 19, 1998
6:30 p.m.
6:30 p.m.
".-...
Q:\CfIYCEN1\Agenda (lO.8)doc
0\.%
tf
\~J
Draft
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
ROSEVILLE CITY CENTER TASK FORCE CHARGE
(July 27, 1998)
Underlines means comments added by Council on Julv 20, 1998
BACKGROUND
The quality of life in our city is of interest to all residents, especially those areas where
we have the opportunity to meet our neighbors and interact in a friendly civic setting.
Mu~h of this interaction is focused around shopping, cultural. educational. civic, religious
or recreational activities. Roseville does not have a central meeting place where all these
activities happen together. Roseville lacks a "center" and real and virtual linkages
between city civic affairs, recreation, open space, schools and colleges, as well as
commercial activities.
Traditionally, communities grew around centers of commerce, which were often the
"main streets" of the town, village or city. Main streets provided the social interaction,
goods, and services that supported the community. Roseville. as a suburban outgrowth of
Saint Paul, never developed a main street, however, over time dispersed auto-oriented
centers of commerce have grown up along major transportation corridors.
Roseville also has an opportunity to create a "main street" along Lexington Parkway, as
part of new city center, which can provide a "heart" for our community. The existing
civic area, encompassing City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station # I, Motor Vehicle
License Department, Ice Arena and John Rose Minnesota Oval provides the existing
public facilities and infrastructure, centrally located in the community, that might be
expanded to establish Roseville City Center.
The Roseville City Center Task Force is an opportunity provided by the City Council to
help create a shared vision for a new city center that serves the citizens of Roseville. It
provides the forum to openly discuss issues and opportunities, and to fonnulate a long
tenn strategy to establish an exciting and vibrant mixed-use recreational, civic, and
entertainment center for our community.
TASK FORCE CHARGE
The Task Force is charged with preparing recommendations to the City Council and
Planning Commission regarding the results of their investigation and deliberations.
The City Council encourages the Task Force to explore the following interrelated issues:
~
'\~
/}.~
. What are the overall goals we hope to achieve through the activities of the Task
Force?
. What are the components of a successful City Center?
. What are the possible" stretching" ideas, how can we better use the space within the
first ring suburb context.
. What uses should be part of a successful Roseville City Center?
. What are examples of other successful City Centers in the region, in the State of
Minnesota, in the U.S. and in other countries?
... . ~
. What is the current" body of knowledge" regarding, traffic, land use, utilities,
,drainage and environmental issues that can be offered to residents and the City?
I. What are the positive features of the existing civic center?
2. How do existing civic and recreational uses fit with potential new uses?
3. What are the short and long-tenn land use issues that need to be resolved?
4. What are the traffic and building issues in tenns of site access, road and parkway
capacity, trails. soil conditions, and fill materials?
5. What environmental regulations need to be resolved in tenns of stonn water and
subsurface water quaiity and quantity, noise, air quality, etc.
6. What are the rights and responsibi!iti~s of adjoining property owners, City,
County, State, Railroad, Department of Natural Resources (water bodies) etc.?
7. What are the high tech" linkages" that may tie the community together such as
cable systems, radio centers, and phone systems, etc.? What are the possible
shared opportunities?
. What are the specific issues to which changes should be considered (e.g. traffic lights,
railway corridor, high tension power lines, location of access points, etc.)?
. Should there be a change in land use zones in or near the civic center, and, if so, why
and what other uses?
. What role does the public and private sector play in improving/changes to the civic
center? How should Roseville' s effort be coordinated with the County, neighboring
cities. school districts, State of Minnesota. Federal Government. and other quasi-
public organizations?
. What public" experts" are available to help the Task Force?
2
'.
The Task Force is encouraged to access and utilize the resources of the Roseville
Community Development Department, Public Works Department and Parks and
Recreation Department and other agencies as part of the fact finding mission. The Task
Force also may choose to involve other residents of the City for information, subgroups
and other work teams as needed.
REPORT
The Task Force work shall begin after the appointment process has been completed by
the City Council. A five phase process has been developed to formulate a master plan for
the city center. The first phase, development discovery, is underway and is expected to
be completed by December 1998, with the preparation of a draft report. It is anticipated
that the Task Force should complete its work by September 1999.
.,' J
SELECTION OF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
The Task Force shall be composed of9 to 15 members and follow the policy on creation
of Task Forces. The appointment of committee members will occur on August 24, 1998.
A solicitation process shall seek interest from various groups including: residents,
businesses, educational, civic or religious representatives, or property owners, Vista 2000
Focus Group members, and persons involved in recent Task Force efforts in the City of
Roseville. The Council may wish to appoint a liaison member(s) from the City Council,
Planning Commission.
TASK FORCE CHAIR
The method of selection of a chairperson will be decided at a later date by the City
Council.
STAFF ASSISTANCE
The staff liaison to the Task Force will be Dennis Welsch, Community Development
Director. Bob Bierscheid, Director of Parks and Recreation and Karl Keel, Director of
Public Works will also be key resources on the project.
In advance, the City Council extends its thanks to each member ofthe Task Force for
your willingness to contribute your time and knowledge to the study and report.
Q:\Task Force CharRe,doc
3
~" .
.
June 8, 1998
Mr. Terry Kayser
Grants and loan Manager
Office of local Assistance
Metropolitan Council
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634
RE: Planning Grant #SG97157, City of R seville
Dear Terry:
~<ttV
Attached is the exc t from the minutes of he May 26, 1998 City Council meeting
allocating the Pia ing Grant #SG970157 ~ r $7,670 to the City Center Planning
Proceess. Note at the City will be matchi 9 the funds and the entire project (Phase I)
will exceed $ , . Ellerbe-Becket, throu h Bryan Carlson and Kim Way, ha-:e gegYR
the Phase I work) ~ UJt~ k.\ ~~ ~... ('/'8,000. ~ ~
\..~
As more information becomes available, w will forward copies for your records.
~~
Sincerely,
Dennis P. Welsch 490-2232
Communitiy Development Director
Attachments: Ellerbe Becket Planning Proposal
Excerpt of minutes: City Council meeti g of May 26, 1998
)(C.~ P.f ~ 1\t:t
Q:\GRANTS\CITYCENT. WPD
--..'
i
(!J'~
(j\)
"2 '- ''-=- ~,,~ \-~.)
.;: '~~'~~' "', ,:' ';~. " :
..' I''', ,.. ," "
~.'~.~ '.:i";'~~~\f.;:.t>''''~'-<';;'C';;'':';:-O:''i:!I:'''..:<''';'''..
g.'\~',,}:,),,} ~;: ,:...:.,;
June 8, 1998
Mr. Terry Kayser
Grants and Loan Manager
Office of Local Assistance
Metropolitan Council
230 East Fifth Street
Sf. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634
RE: Planning Grant #SG97157, City of Roseville
Dear Terry:
Attached is the excerpt from the minutes of the May 26, 1998 City Council meeting
allocating the Planning Grant #SG970157 for $7,670 to the City Center Planning
Proceess, Note that the City will be matching the funds and the entire project (Phase I)
will exceed $45,000. Ellerbe-Becket, through Bryan Carlson and Kim Way, have begun
the Phase I work,
As more information becomes available, we will forward copies for your records.
Sincerely,
Dennis p, Welsch 490-2232
Communitiy Development Director
Attachments: Ellerbe Becket Planning Proposal
Excerpt of minutes: City Council meeting of May 26, 1998
Q:\GRANTS\CITYCENT.WPD
2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE · !,OSL\ lU,E . \1J:'\:'-ilSOT.,\ · 531J3-1SWI
61:-.F)(1-2:!on . TDD hI2-490-22f!7
CJ\~
IZ\)
~.
Extract of Minutes from Roseville City Counci meeting of May 26,1998:
Member Goedeke moved, Member Maschka seconded, that the Mayor and City Manager
be authorized to sign a contract with Ellerbe Becket for providing Phase 1 of the City
Center Master Plan and Development Strategy in an amount not to exceed $55,000 plus
reimbursable expenses, to be funded from a combination of a grant received from
Metropolitan Council and Contingent Account.
Roll Call:
Ayes: 5, Mastel, Maschka, Wiski, Goedeke and Wall
Nays: None
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
26th day of May, 1998, with the original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this ~+~" day of
1997.
............
, \
/~+--l.L 4
\ ;
, ,/
'~ -~.' t
";;;n'R sark:Zv? ~i~;r~
SEAL
.
'.
· ~ Metropolitan Council
~ {.M . or e n, Planning for the Future
"
f
~. ~.
~,~) ~
No. SG97157 ~
\-'f'\tJtV
\~ ,
~\~
You recently received a grant from the MetroPolit~1 Council in the amount of $7670.00
to update your comprehensive plan by the end of/t 998. The grant agreement between
Roseville and the Council requires a written Midpoint and Final Progress Report. Most
grant applicants were sent a blank form, like the one attached to this letter, in 1998. (If
your application was approved in the latter half of 1998, you may not have received
one.) Our files indicate we require either a mid-point or final report from your jurisdiction
documenting your grant activities. -
Steven Sarkozy
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
'---'
RE: Mid-Point Progress Report, Planning Grant
~~.
Dear Mr ~.ozy. .
We are asking that the enclosed performance report be completed and returned to us.
Please refer to your copy of the above numbered grant, particularly noting Attachment
A--Grantee's Work Plan and Budget, for the specific activities you proposed to
accomplish with the grant funds.
The enclosed form is a generalized summary of all of the possible elements a
-../ comprehensive plan might include. If some of the elements listed on the form are not
part of the workplan of Roseville, please mark that item "N.A."
If your comprehensive plan is nearing completion, or has already been submitted for
review, please use this form to indicate final and actual costs for the various planning
activities you've undertaken. Please indicate it as a "Final" progress report if it is so.
As you will recall, the Council has already provided 90 percent of the grant and retains
the remaining 1 0 percent subject to the submission of your final comp plan and a final
progress report, I look forward to reviewing your materials soon so that I can close our
financial account with you in a timely fashion.
----
\... \grantpgm\midpolnt.ltr
.,
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651.602.1356, or your '\JfJ
Sector Representative. r.,yr
~S \~of' ~
~~~ ~
AREA CODE CHANGES TO 651 IN JULY. 1998 ~
Sincerely,
~s~
G;~~{;~~e~," Manager
Office of Local Assistance
~~
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Mtnnesota 55101.1626
(612) 602.1000
Fax 602.1550 TDD/TIY 291.0904 Metro Info Line 602,1888
An Equal OpportWlity Empwyer
April 3. 1998
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy. City Manager
City of Roscvillc
2660 Civic Calla- Drive
RoIevi1Ie, MN 5S 113
Rc: RoseviUe City Center
Cnmmi"ioa No.: 7491-981
Subject: City Ceater Mula' Plan aad Development Strategy
, Phase 1 - Revised Scope of Services
Dear Steve,
We cajoyed -edi-. with you and Dennis on Tuesday to discuss the next steps in the Rosevi.Ile
City CcaIa' procca. [t wu a wry useful meeting and we believe we now have . better idea of
the City's goals IIId objoct:M:s for this process. Based on your comments and our discussion.
we haw prqMI'CId . IIIOR defiaitive scope of services for the Developmcat Discowry Phase of
work for review ad cfisngsioa with City CouaciI on Tuesday aftanooa, April 7.
Scaae .f Scnica
AIIiIt the City of RoseviI1e in prepariog a masta' plan ud developmeat stnIe&Y to tUlly realize
the City CeaIer ~ ad vision. The sugesced process inwIws a five pbue approach;
DG..~ DiDJvery. ~_t AaaIysis aDd AI.......-.. ofF1IIIR R.equinmeIds.
D\,4'''''''~'' ....... PI-ma Abautiw:a. Muta' PIa F~I.,w. aad o---*-~ The
faUowiaIlCOpO.1IeI\'iceI cWiaeI the wuk JII'08PID. {OI' the ~t DiIcovay Phase
oaIy. Upc. ('J(oft~ of Phacl the coasuItaDt team will meet with city c:ouaciI aad ... to
.... CII1 . deCai1cld ICOpe of ICIVices. woR prosram IIId scNduie for the subsequcat phases.
.ftue 1 - ~dopIDaIt DiIcoftI'y
ne pIIII.,...... ....... is to 'WOIk wida die City of RmDrilIc aad die RGIeviUD
<-c .~ to......... ilia __ b willi.. City c..r:r.. be. Tbe ~
_ will..... ... ~- awiIIIble iafanaatiaD aad.... .bout die ..~ city ceaID"
.. _die a.c.moe 0C0MIl\ic marbt made anWIbIe by City.... Tbia iafonuaiaD will be
uliliftld . pIIt of. ....Iic pu1icipatiCII1 procell -an.. input from the ~I.ty of what their
City Caller ..... be.
The pmdIIct of..... 1, will be . lite.. 11 1-t,. bl.:_ IDIIbt .... W'I.IIII'_~ pia aDd
~ IDd . 'YiIiaa pl-.1Dd preliminmy dewIIopmcat prop..
Tbc EIIcdJe Becbt PlauaiDg Temn will wad closely with Roscvil1c City staff CII1 the pabaiDg
and I)'Idbesis ofbadcgrouad iuCormatiOll aad data.
I
I
ELLERBE BECKt,
,;.
800 ~Salle
Avenue
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
55402
Telephone
612,376.2000
FaCSImile
612,]76.2552
0\<6
'^~
...
'((ff?
'Bf I
J
jllp
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page 2
The by issues to be addRssed will be:
· Wortc: with the City to clarify the vision {or the City Center concept, planning principles,
project goals and objectives and program.
· Wodc: with the City to gather public input for the conc:cpt ad development of the City
Cada'.
· Review cxistina sill: and facilities, planning studies, surveys and aaalysc:s provided by die
City, mdudi....... use. circuJltioa. services and utilities.
s. Aa- ..4IJt
Tuk A - Reriew and RdiIIe Scope of services - Meet with City officials to review and
refioc scope of services and public participation process.
Tuk B - GatIIer Del reriew rdeYut bue iDformatioa - This will include; topographic
maps,lCria! plkqrapby. put pllDDiag studies, zoaiag ordin~, etc.
Tuk C - Co.dad t*otograpIIic recoa....'1DCC ud iDYeatory - The coaswtaDt team will
visit tbo sill: and RICIOId ~ site coaditioas aad sUJ'l'OUDCliog area characteristic for use in
DLUIa' pI....mw IDd public JR""'.ODI.
NoIe: Obliqw aerioJ photography would be duil'tlbk. 1he ConsuJIDnIteam can tlSSist the
City ill ~ dtb ~on ifnot olnGdy avai/oble. This service is not incluMd in OUT
fa propoIQl.
T_ D - Site AuIJ8I- Prepue . .me. of c:xbibits that record IDd iIIuaandI= tbo ....
. . oIiIi iadad" '--...1 . -..I _c.. 3 . podcatI. r...
...... 00-""" .~ .... -, tI~ _..~ panaaa. &aD ,It r.
......,~ ......1IIiIitieIftitD iafruInIcIure, .......... ~ c1imaIeImic:ro-,
Not.: 11rU ~ wlU prr1t1Itle tift awrview of tIN opportIIIIitiu and constl'ainls to
dtrwlDptraL II U ItOIl1WItded 10 be an in-depth ,.cMicoJ tIIJIJ envif'OnlMntaJ investigation.
A..". tIHlqIII...,.. WOIIId H ptIrl of PIta.w 2, DlrwJDptIWIII ~ and ~ 01
FIIIIIIw bpIr III ",
T" & - ....e........ Uad A.uIJID - BIlled.. die pi.... .. ---.f ~~ .
~ .... to. ---..1 which dOIdy iUuIInIeI..~y hnund-ia, 0WMa.....
.......1 . ...-......- ~.... ~..... ~.,. ... iat'nIUucIIn
........... .11 1......DIIIy be ~my to auppaIt die ~.~ ,.,..
----- AI............... BcMJ.1ie ProfiM
T" A - GtIIIIcr ... ntkw -.... eeoumic data - 11Ua iDfonDaIioa will be provided by
City ........ wiD fama die bail for 1M Bar"i- M..... Profile.
Tat B - B__ Muted Profile - Syqtt-i:m the ecooomic elm aad prepare a base1.iDc
OCODODIic JII06Ie for the Ci~ ia fenDs of cIemograpbics, jobs, bousiaa, etc.
,
I
I
Mr. Steven R. Saikozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page 3
Tuk C - EcODOmiC Projectioas - Based on the Bas-:!ine Market Profile and data available for
the City aod n:gion. project the economic potential "r the City by market segment (Office,
housiDg, busiDess, industrial, retail, sports/cntcrtainmcotIJeisW'C).
Note: 1M &1seune Mtuket Data and Economic Profile will be performed hy an. as yet.
unidenlijied ecoIfDIIIic consu/Janl who may or may not be part of the Ellerbe Becket Planning
Team. 1M C6St for this urvice is not included in our fee proposal.
PtdJIi,c ^'~ PNIot!a
Tal&: A - RolniIIe City Cater Task Force - To oversee the preparation of a Master Plan
and ~t Serm:gy for the City Ceoter, we would J"I'!CftIIInwond the formation of a Task
Fomc or AdvisoIy Commiaec ~pwed of 12-1 S iDdividuals who best represeot the interests
of the commODity. Tbia JrOUP abouId be composed of City Ceoter stakeholders including;
resideDts, bua.iDeas pcopJc aad civic lcada's.
Tal&: B - o.e..o...-e illteniews - Working ttuou,h the Task Force and City staII identify key
iDdividuals who ha~ . \UIed or Ipccial interest in the dcvc10pmc0t of the City Ceoter and
<XIt'dvct OIIIC-GI-CJDC individual coafideatial interviews to gain insight into the opportunities,
procell aDd poCeatial 0P1iCmJcI. (A maximum of 15 interviews is envisioocd.)
Tuk C - Discovery WorkHop - The discovery workshop process is dcsigacd to allow
intafacc aad input from key political and business organizations, civic and cultural groups,
neephorbood UIOCiatiaas aad special interests.
T_ D - DeIip Evat - The dcsip evcot would be WMh~ in "cbareUc" format aad will
allow .~ poop m -.....ty Vlel"ben to CGDe ~ to uaist die pI__i.. team in
siYiaa pkyIicII.... ... ~ to die viID for die R.c-=viUe City c.ca... This CMIIIt will
be ~ by"" ~ pIbcred duriDa Ibe Site AJIC"'-'''' by Ibe BMrAioo
M.-bt Data...~ PnIfiJo. It is ....~ chat die ~ be by iDviDaioB oa1y
aad IimiIod iallUlllbcr. The gmeraI public would be invired to obserw, but would DOt be active
~" Their input woukt be IOIicired at the QOftIIIIIIftity opca howIe.
T_ E - c.. La........., Opaa B..- - Upoa the c-~ afPbMe 1, die wadt ofdle
pi""" __ II1II o.--~--;ty 1WUIII4 be ~ to die pJbtic ia.....'" &IaDIL
~ ~ .....~"* g{ die City _ pi.... taaD woaW be.....lO Wit GIIIHIHJDD with
~!-I..4J.1...ity ............. IiIIIII to dIeir idea_ reconI tbcir ~ _I - A..
CD c..w y.... ,.,... """ ...._J._4"..."",.
T_ A - amae ad RdiIIC Site AaeaIDeM - Mae revisioaI to 1be sa ADcJt~ based
OIl iaput rn. the public ~ III'OCeII for iDdaIioa iD City CeaIII' viIiaD ~t
Tak B - RmIe .. RefiIIe IcoIIomic Profile - Make revisioaI to Ibe Marbc Data ad
EcoaoIIIK Profile buo OIl iDput form 1be public par1icipaIioa pIOOCII for iDcI."it. iD the City
Ceater visiOD doea,-t.
...,._..:....~-.~. .
Mr. Stevm R Saricozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page.
---"
Tuk C - Doauaat Pllblit ParticipatiOD Procas/Commuity V.,iOD - Gacber aad
~i~ aD reIevaD& iaConaatioa paerated through the public participation process aod
iaoorpo.-aIc ia the visioa dnt!.-t
Tuk D - .....-i..ry DeftIopmeBt Program - Based 011 iaCOf'IIUdioa paerated as part of
the 01'-"-..... PnJfiIe. ~ic projectioas aod input &om the community prepan: a
JP'imi-y~..w ~_ for Ro.cviUe City Cc:aIer.
T_ E - vw. ... - Baed 011 the prelimilUlf)' dew:lopIIICIIt IR8fUa aad deYdop8ble laud
....,... "'..0 . 0-. pi. Cor the City Cada' Ibat idcotifics poCaIliaJ uses, use
""~~ - id.......v ~v...... to support the uses. This caacept or Vision Plan
wiD pnJVidO die bais fw IIICn iD-cIepda aoaJysis in the next phases of the RoseviUc City Coata'
Mala' Plan ad ~ Sanfe&y JII'OCCSS.
SdIed_ - We botiew daat the reriIod scope of senioes, oudiDed above, {or the Development
DiJcovery Pbao ca be -ooomplu.hed within albrce (3) mootb lime Uame as illustl'all!d in the
~~ Work PIopam aDd ~'I~ ~thacbed. Thill scbcduIc illustrates bow key tasks and
the public pu1icipMioa pI'OCCIS ildafa1C over the tbrcc moada period.
c..,e..atioII-. We Mfi-.... that Ibc fees for the DeveIopmc:ot Discovay Phase would be
$4',000-$5',000 pi. nUlbutublc expeaICI. As n:fera.cod emier, this fee does DOt iDclude
the .me. m.. <<",_Ift.~ ""cIriv,_.t coasu1taat. It a1ao doca DOt iDcIudc poCaItiaJ tl!lc;hqical
iDput CIII cnlIic, ciWl, end(loo-,~11IId oCher- professw.,1 ~-eriaa services. The City of
RmmDe lid' JDay be IbIe to pnMde IOIDC or aU of Ibis Mditioqal )nlessiooaI input
At die (-~... m..... I we wiD IDeet wiIb City o.mcilllld....to review aad refiae the
8CIJPO 01..... WGIt ........ ~~ Cor the r-,nn"'a four...... ofdle Maller PIa
... ~~9- ---" SInIaaY JIIuceII . nod" below:
.... J - Dtwd.,.. AuIJID .... A... IlP't"It of hWre Reqlli.~ - inr.h.d~ si~
~""... ......1RIfMa ~. eCc, This pbue may iadude _'JRity
d_~~ reriDw m pI--.lIuIIieI_ iDfnsIrucaure surwys ie., cirQtl.~ uIiIitics de..
.... 3 - Da-J ~...... "--' AIteuIiwa - A~ ~ -'*r.~~.
in ......~ ~... _ orra-.' ..&Iad UIC'" cir-..... TIIia.... laY __
tI .......11U..... -r "riG r-nw-~"'"v__ 1 i.-.i, WGlWLup.
...... - M.kr........ .~... _1~.... ...~ __~ with....
~ ...~ IG c<<i-. ciIa.... .. opeD IpICO COOIiOI"
.... 5 - ~ ___ . fcJrmIIt to be deaImiaod.
Mr. Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
April 3, 1998
Page S
We look forward to the opportuDity to assist Ibe City of Roscville in achieving its vision for 8
revitalized City Center, the heart of a truly "Iivable city". We are coa.fideat that our services to
Cbc City of RoseviIle will exceed your expectations in creative processes and design, efficient
execucioa IUId attcativc clieat service. Please review our reviscci scope of .services for the
~-ent DiIcovery Phue aDd Jet us bow if you have any questioas or need any
additioaaI iafcnDltioa.
SiDccnIy,
EJJabe Becbt. loc.
c: Don Eybets
Roseville City Center
~~aster Plan and Development Strategy
Suggested Work Program and Scbedule
April 1998
Month Month Month Month Month Month
Pbase 1-Deve1opment Dkcowtry 1 1 3 4 5 6
SIIe~
A Meet WillI City /-
8 Gather and review base data ...
C PhoIogtaphic inwentoty ...
D Existing conditions -
E Developable land analysis - ....
lasefine MIIt,t Data and fconamk Profile
A Gather and review e<onomic data ..
B Baseline market profile
C Economic projections - ....
PuIIIIc PaI1idpItion
A Roseville City Center Task Force _ _ * _ _ *
8 Qne.on.one inteMews
C DiscOIIefy~
D Design Mnt .
E Community Open House .
CIty Cenb!r vtsiaR .... and PnHm. Dew. fIro9'am
A Document sit! as5eSSment
8 Document ecomnric profile
C 00aImert public ~ process
0 PIeIinny ~eIopmer.t PIogram '"
E Vtsion Plan -
-
.... Z.D..... ~ ... AIIIIr*"
'-SS1ffnul of,.... ~
..... J.DluJl{ Jl I ~ ..... ...... I AItIrndwes
............... fGI,_ "1"
..... S-DoaIR~tatIw
'--'
_._'
~llv
\A.. ~
ELLERBE BECKET
~
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Detail S~hedule
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. CITY dENTER
-'-'
Dept Phase Employee 10 & Name
302001 5710-MP 7276 - Rothwell, Michelle
102028 571()..MP 4748. Loldolt, Jon Chris
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102028 571Q-MP 4748 - Loidolt, Jon Chris
102028 571Q-MP 4748 - Loidolt. Jon Chris
102028 5710-MP 4748 - Loidolt. Jon Chris
102023 5710..Q3 1750 - Eyberg, Donald Thaodor
102028 5710-03 8464. Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464. Way. Kim Norman
102028 5710-03 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464. Way, Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464 . Way. Kim Norman
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim Norman
102028 571Q-MP 8464. Way, Kim Norman
DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE HOURS
Current
Hrs
1.00
38.00
14.00
2.00
28.50
2.50
2.00
4.00
12.00
2.00
2.00
12.00
4.00
1.00
125.00
Invoice # 7491982000-L003
Project 7491.9820.00.00
Timesheet Comments
Task Force Meeting # 8
Task Force Meeting # 8
Page 1
I
ELLERBE BECKET
"
Invoice # 7491982001-L005
ELLERBE BECKET, INC.
Detail Schedule
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CITY CENTER ADD SERVICES Project 7491.9820.01.00
Dept Phase Employee ID & Name
302001 5740-CO 1619 - Epperson. Beth
102028 5710-MP 7916 - Sporer, Benjamin Eric
102028 5710-MP 7916 - Sporer, Benjamin Eric
102028 571D-MP 4748 - Loidolt. Jon Chris
'302001 578D-00 4949 - McGiffin, Miriam
102011 5710-03 0843 - Busse, Stephen
102011 5710-MP 0843 - Busse, Stephen
102028 5710-MP 7916 - Sporer, Benjamin Eric
102028 571D-MP 8464 - Way. Kim
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim
102028 571D-MP 8464 - Way, Kim
102028 5710-MP 8464 - Way, Kim
DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE HOURS
Current
Hrs
0.75
15.50
13.00
15.00
1.00
6.50
17.00
1.50
4.00
4.00
6.00
2.00
86.25
Timesheet Comments
site planning
ouneil Chambers/atrium study
site planning
Page 1
I
-------------
ELLERBE BECKET
,~
Arcl\itects Engineers Planners
800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis. MN USA 55402-2014
Remit to:
Ellerbe Becket
NW 8400
P.O. Box 1450
Minneapolis. MN 55485-8400
Invoice
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MR STEVEN R SARKOZY CITY MANAGER
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
ROSEVILLE, MN 55113
Invoice # 7491982000-X003
Invoice Date: 05/14/1999
I Invoice Amount: $91.76
, Terms: NET 30
I I Due Date: 06/13/1999
ELLERBE BEr.~ET"NC'
Summary InrOICS
I
, I
EXPENSES - CITY CENTER! Project 7491.9820.00.99
Amount Billed to Date:
I
!
I
I
I
,
$727.59
Total Trave':
Total Reproduction:
Total Miscellaneous:
--....81 Reimbursable Charges:
$48.03
$24,23
$19.50
$91.76
AMOUNT DUE AND NOW PAYABLE
$91.76
'--
,
I
I
i
I
I
,
i
,
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
A service Charge ot 1.5% per month (but not I xceeding the maximum permissible by law) will
be payable on aly past due account
/
,4.. ·
~
ELLERBE BECKET
-~
ELLERBE BECKET. INC.
Detail 5 hedule
Invoice # 7491982000-X003
EXPENSES - CITY CENTER Project 7491.9820.00.99
Vendor ID & Name
08464 - WAY, KIM
Direct Meals
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464. WAY, KIM
Direct Travel
Total Travel:
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Other Adjustments
Reproduction Inside
Total Reproduction:
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464 - WAY, KIM
08464. WAY, KIM
Direct Misc
Total Miscellaneous:
Total Reimbursable Charges:
-----'
Total Dollars Transaction Description
$4.53 199~3-08 Meals
$4,53
$7.00 1999-03-08 Parking / Taxl/8u
$6.50 1999-03-08 Mise - Other
$1.00 1999-03-16 Parking / Taxi / Su
$6.50 1999-03-16 Mise - Other
$7.50 1999-03-18 Parking I Taxi I Bu
$8.00 1999-04-22 Parking / Taxi / Bu
$7.00 1999-04-15 Parking I Taxi/ Su
$43.50
$48.03
$2.82 Sets Plot Bond
$5.64 Sets Plot Bond
$3.38 ERS Sets Plot Bond 12/31/98
$5.63 ERS Sets Plot Bond 2/15/99
$6.76 ERS Sets Plot Bond 2/28/99
$24.23
$24.23
$6.50 1999-03-18 Misc - Other
$6.50 1999-04-15 Mlsc - Other
$6.50 1999-04-22 Misc. Other
$19.50
$19.50
$91.76
Page 1
)
-
-
.
"C
4) 4)
U II)
... :::I
:::I....
o I:
(/):::1
.. 0
4) E
.c: I'G
O"C
I:
I'G
....
I:
:::I
o
E"C
<(g:
1:::J
ftI
(5
....
It)
""'"
....
0)
(,!)
CI)
.s
J!J
II)
o
(4)
....
'tIftI
SO
I'G
E
+:I
II)
W
....
~
e -g
(,!)cuiii
5 $; .s. ~
OO;;;);U:::I
1::CU~1I)
o~<(.!!!
~tt >-
"'....1:
"'0<(
~~
1;;,0
0)
e
Q"
....
.~
o
Q.
't!,
:e
CI
.5 II)
.!: Jo:
I'G II)
E I'G
411-
~
'tI
4)
.... II)
~Jo:
Q.II)
E ftI
oI-
l)
II)
41
+:I
'S;
+i ..-.
u>-
<(Q.
I:Q.
I'G I'G
itiii
t:S';-
~1ij--
....Jo:
o U
~.!
ftI U
E-
E
:::I
(/)
lii,,'1
3:3
li~t1
"'i!H
~: I~
I';,
I[Hr.1
,,'
ctI
~~
'c "E
~:g
Q.en
>.;:=
.au
~5
~ ~8
c e c:
1i 0.0
cD CD ';;j
::2: c,!!!
,2 'g E
:a .- E
::II'Xil'\11 0
a. I'(U> c..>
(I)
:a
g
rJi
cD
~
'(3
~
o
g:g
:co.
::I .
"0 5:
.5 :::::s
_ .,;--0
-o~c
5's.!!!
o c .
... cD 3
~> .-
Oc:.r:
-0.
~l'i~
.?:>a;g
'c E E .
:::::s c (I) .B
EoO(l)
E's;
oc
c..>w
I
I,':
I::
I.;
~:
I),~I
l]~
p<,>.:t
,.:~
(':'
I~I
I~~~I
C)
c
:c
::I
"0
.=
C:W
~:a
=c 'E a.~
5: c (I) ~c.
&. ~ E "'I en 0.
e ~ ~ ~. B C: ~
0. c: :gctl :Ci ::10
"'0 Q):;::C ~, en...c:
c E .- <IS - I 0 <IS
ctI 0.~::2: gl c13C::
CD <IS 0 (I).... .- iC: Q) c
c:roa;cO.!'d) rJi~ gctl~
~ ~ ~ s ro ~~1:~ c I~ c ~
'~ ~ 0 ';, ~ ~ .~ ~ ~5 U) ~ 5: ~
~ a:.=~\J- CII:t1::rJ).......
a;:1C1U)'-~ wco~~.!
rJ) ctI::IrJ)...ctI ctlo.'C;>ro
::)~_oQ)::I_ E....'~ctI(I)>
-0 "" en J: a: en'- (I), <( a. en >
c: '0:
j ~'
'::
,;,;i
;',
tt
':
"
:'
','
[,:"
),l
,
,;,'
;,.':
,:'
:,~,;
>'
';'~
.;
<
"
1~!:
h
I
I;'::
I,;
,'i
li!i{Jil
I
U)
fjEt c:
'S ~ co
~ ~ i:', C::-O
ro a.. ~:;i C (;
o _ 'i. (I) 0
E .\11 :i; E c..>
ctI u. E i,'" g. (ij
OJ fIi Q) ~::0 1ii C
e e 1) ':- ~ ~
a.'Ea.;:',~oc:
c: 0 E,;;; 0 0 ....
,g ~ = ",; '3 'E ~
.1!! .!!!.1!! en(l)!2 8>
c::: 0 .- - ....
(1)80. -0(1)
E 11! ctI 0 'E
(I) c..> 6W-
c. :;i :;:>
.E :,1 g
[~f,1
\;:i
,[,
.1'~
I:
I;~;
,":
I~tl
'.
t
~
-0
C
<IS
"E rJ)
<IS c:
o .2
en U
c =s
o U)
.U) .~
U) ::I
,- ....
E CD
E ,=
8 (5 'd)
:: ~ Cij
"g .1218.
,'::I (I)
rJ) 0 Z U)
.~ c..> '0 :g
m ~ 51ii
~ g :;:> Ci
o :;:> 1'3"0
.a 0 +- .c:
::I -0 00
a. <( z en
'0
C
::J
o
()
o
....
-
Q)
:2
a>
o
c
S
I/)
'00
I/)
<(
~
o
--l
....
o
Q)
o
IE
o
'0
I:
::J
o
()
e
-
Q)
:2
,g
Q)
-
co
o
ro
E
E
.a
::J
C/)
"t:I
Q)
-
co
Co
Tj
:0:;
c
<(
....-
Q)
I/)
>-
co
~
~
Q)
I-
.9
I:
....
::J
-
Q)
a::
$
co
o
Q.j
-
co
o
c
o
:0::;
Q)
0..
E
o
()
"0
Q)
-
co
Co
'0
:;::i
I:
<(
>-
.a
"t:I
Q)
-
Q)
0..
E
o
()
{
"
t
.
.'
.....~..'~. ,-,_.
j
r-l' -'.-----_.,'-; .-..'....' ,_..'.',., ',....,
i '! II'.~
I ,_
l - '..,. -~--::::,
.~ I.:~'~~~J~'~-"":.""-"'.-' ~~~~~_;"'<L.'.,;~-<;j'
:
.
~S
a
~ ~I
~~
Q) ~
+J~
~~
~~
~ ~
Q)~
d~
Q).'::
u.~
.c~
.~
u
'I' ~~ j
.. .
.., E g
~ "'-.!
"" -" ~::
~r'" 1ft
0... . :t ~ ;;
>.. i-z
'~M'
]~,; !
~~ :..
City Center Update
Dear Resident:
The purpose of City Center Update is to keep you informed about.the activities of the Roseville
City Center Task Force. The Task Force study is t:~e first step in an extensive. public process to
determine the needs ofthe City Center neighborhood for the next 25 years. You have received
City Center Update because you live either in or near the City Center area involved in the study.
The Roseville City Council wants you to be informed about the Task Force activities and involved in
the planning process.
The 13-member City Center Task Force was appointed by the Roseviile Cit'f Council in August of
1998. The Task Force is composed of 13 citizen members. The study wiil take at least nine months
and is supposed to be completed by mid-July, 1999. The consultant is Kim Way, a nationally
recognized city center designer with the firm Ellerbe-Becket. Roseville's Community Development
Director, Dennis Welsch (490-2232) is the City staff coordinator for the project.
The purpose of the City Center study is to be visionary - to determine what the needs of the City
may be in the study area for the next 25 years. The study was recommended by the Planning
Commission in the 1994 Comprehensive Plan. The center of the study area is the corner of
Lexington Avenue and County Road C. As Kim Way said at the October 8 organization meeting,
the strength of the area is Central Park, the Civic Center and the existing scale of buildings in the
area. The challenge is to make the City Center more accessible by pathway, sidewalk and street
systems and to create a mix of uses that interest all age groups within the community.
One of the upcoming activities of Kim Way and the Task Force is to interview interested groups in
the community including one meeting specifically designed for property owners in or near the study
area.
The second meeting of the City Center Task Force is scheduled for Thursday, October 22, 1998
beginning at 6:30 p.m,. in City Hall, 2660 Civic Center Drive. The meeting is open to the public.
This meeting and future meetings win be telecast on Cable Channel 16.
If you have questions, please contact Dennis Welsch at 490-2232 (fax: 490-2931). The City Center
Update will be sent to you each month prior to the City Center Task Force meeting.
Attachments:
1. Agenda for October 22 meeting
2. Map of study area
3. Meeting notes from first meeting of October 8, 1998
4. Charge to the Task Force from the City Council
5. Names/addresses of Task Force members
/
SEE ATTACHMENT #
IN PLANNING FILE PF # "? I [/
for hard..copy original of oversized document
To be scanned at a later date and incorporated into final pdf
Q:\Scanning\Attachment Reference Page,doc
8
c;r-'--
tr:.:-. ,
-Lj,--r-,
L ;,e"-I
(" l.i _ ..___
I
-\{
"
I'
!~~,
~~""F"--'?-"\.~\--"'-;r---:~=r ~~ r t"~~--'-;"""~
-=-'.- /' '" ~ , I. ,
' ',-" '" ..:_;- !. . . .,
\ ''.:)~r- - '~~AD1I-nDJr""J , '- "1"0;' ,,: ,j> j
o \:~\\ -~fl-'1U ' " ~rl': .~J:;;:~) ,.' ,.~.:
· " . · ", ,..' i
i\ ~ .' :: :,,~t-,..-~;~H,',_::.11 '"I., ..~L..
.,> ,- 'f:-j
o I c:e:nn:',
','-jL"'~'i':; ,J',:" i
-::!~ ;,~ , :1
" C:', '.~. i. ::01
-. ~01
"
'~i~.,
.':L':':J6::" ;!-1, .,'
H'iL--~~ -t'
d--'1 i :l. .
If ---~ T =*=.Jl
~ ,_V,! ",-'
rf~:,.:-,,:.'t
I ,_ J Ie, '~~"";-i"
I ?~i1'(t.-n
":-----'"
r~ ,
~I,,~
t~:t:.!
" r:i
~
, -~r-
_L.'
I
~:T. .
'. ,
i[ ~.t_~
,,,
- "
:i!
r~L-~~~}~'l\-
~-:~:
I' -rte~t.: J I:. >
I \ L-." _ '_II
" '~Jfj~::;:;. ~
il .
"ii:1
": .::.{., ~ ~
:-;.-.,. I
::;7\lL~ I~'.
~,r-~~ ~UnLUDH LL _
.....,I..._.~....:.' ..L
.", 'Lt
~i1f
I
I.
I (=.'""
~
= '.'-~~
L'
, i ~
,--1 r:--'
I iL___ ,__' ! "_,
c .~~, r -> \
[L;..J n.
~
".\:' ',-
" r......~~I~~:,...'''':'=~
L~~';~~'J
~
I~
f
--~~
t
. .~~;.
",.......o.r:-:'?",~,
_-.-'~::--,~:~_~c'~~-:!c_.J'~~-_ "
~
~ i i
Ii'
I
,
,
i
, i:
I ~ ~ J I , ~
~ H, _ ._'1 '---- -.L ,
'. ~~-r<':~'~'
""i I "c
to; i ~ 1
Ii of i
J~~i;;~~
~~~'~~;::~?i~7~::~::t':71:,~-;::~~'~,
L_"I
~ J ,
~
..Y
L-
a
ll.
'C"~i~~'
: if""'
\1"1'. i
'~'''',\ - _([J
,~;. '0
,~ il .(J) .E
I[ .. ~
"",,," ;;;- · 5 . ~ ',> :r
j't, .. . j' ,g 'g ~iJj, 0
./, '",' C ~/ ~, ?:-ci: v; ;~;r"Q). f"I
. -~ ,! -. v, -'-".=
it 2 L~,~,' ."~o G ;~. Q:.6
!I ([J 0 ~ :0 c ~ .~ 0::.. 'Cf "
'lI +-' 0... ~ ,i',g ~ " ~, ',..~'~ f,'.,',!,'
II' ([J ~ _ ~ .
If > ':.. ~ l ~
'Jr =",. ~- _M ,~, I I' I.. 'I ' \iL ' .
.. .' ", . <( ". '" c
' 't I -, [JI ["', I' '! I tL:' 11~:: , ,
i il -.] ['Ii ,[t oir~ '1'.J"'II" I I" ] ?:J' Ii ~ "j,
. -' '. q, c .(~ 'cJ,' , , ,':::',.ll !: :: ^ .. ,.
r.~- _J ~--' L _L_~,_~-::-__~_ "j ,." n~'" ".___'''',<,,_ :......
t:~L':::~ -:--=:- ~" " ~ :\f ii ,_ . . _, '
~ --===-r~-r I I ~- L-__ -I 'I '1:,,' '" , '--r I I
-"--, '-'\c""<T'-J r'h ~I'~' io" "'.\ I,.
'"I ';......J'j - If II -- I 1J:.., 11' ~__ '---I . .
' ~ -u+. C", . , ' . < "." "v '''I_.;'-~ I , i 1
f [ I , ; i__,_~L- 1;1 .c:: .!: , ., }~, ---JJ. /., i !--_ ~l.,-+_
'[i'-- 1_- "-I ~,~-- -, I::J 1 n I' 0 2: " , , '~"J,~1IiJ II ~ L., -'-~t-.- ,.....J, ! ; '1
I----i ] I ;........., II I I:" J "', ~~,-L"~l"',::,,, _, I 1 ~~_ .:< <
'. ~I , ~"li-, -,,'L J ,- {', . ~'~.. _'.. ~_,' '1';11'1 II' ,. I '-__- 1 ! ; '-..,'
~ II "--", ,-, - .. , ~-" - l""--'" I. " , , " ~
frll,~-,r~;1 '''-, ---.': =--~--'--=:;f: ~::..: I i ~' 'ill' ': 'I ~:: '''':::'';i
"CL '--'--.-"=-~-li- I . "," :, 'T""
L__, ---=---=-:.-=::.-::. -.:.:.--: =C-, 11_ , 'i;Ij'll " .~"
fr~ i I~F -=;:-';':1-': ~--= I~-=: : !j : i I ~! J : ~1')~~i Ii ' (:-'Z~J:I
I ii I i I I _i '-,'" ; ~ r -, C,___ , r' , 11 I '!'~ " I
II l<i,) , i _x._ .- "~-r,,:I' ! <Ii',' Ii .
1='.-'1:1;----;- " c;: --; I "If I'I .1i'j ii
I !JL1in ~'L~'--I;r.J' i',,! ~R j~'~::1 JI ,
h II, I cu 1\,' L:-':'~,,"- "===, :,.' 'I I ",':: I "'. , I I
[..J;ic=--=:.':,-=-,=---=-~~:=_ ~.~ ;;I! u C hi " Ii f....... .;/'C:'\C::ih'.i,: i i I_:~II
h-::"'Ir ~"""-=~-""'-IL~ l--"t Ir- ~ I ~:Ij' I- 0 v J~" 0i': i,' :'~J""::""',~--:,:,..,,-:,~c-;" II~~.-d
- "I r. 1 ' I . ". r" -"'- ~M.~] I,,;..i I ') ~ ..... ~ .... ,
I, ' hO, i~-".l, '''-'IJ. ~ "'" D ,~.~ .1,",:: F',' '_"'''' . "i';' , .'
f: "1[, --, rill '---I, i1~ ._~~= 10 ", , [, ,I " ,I
:JII,!, I . '~--"~',~ "","- :---j ,i II I .'--=_1 'I c" ",-,"_'~
J11 '--t- '-1--: .'., ,..' ._~ .' " :i ,_,_. 'I i '_' c' '. ,,-,,_"=.,
Fill '~ J I -~.!.-~, I ~~ ~.......-- O~ --"- LL , 'w " : ,J', ,< ""!___,I
~I, Ii' '- 'n" ';0' ,'.' ,: "-II 0 'III f; " c._ -11 :L_ ~ r~i (, '-,) 'I
~ I',,, "T:' .:... '=.:,-':=...' ill,:" :r: J J' " ::: ,! I I II f"',[,,,','I," 'i
I--,J)! c'-:="- --:::.~' :... --= ',~- u -co:=-> : 'I U 11 . . . _ ,.,)1 Ii 1'-1,', 'i ' 1...1 '''' .
r--- ,J--;:::=.=::::-_----:::=-=.~I_ ~- I -~ (rCl I! I, _J n,.-, , I 1', "p~ nil J J! ~~;-! ....
' , " '- '.- , " . O. , . , ./ ", '." .
"'t',! i! II--l :,. L~llr.,,_ '''''i, I-IJ. i c:' :, 'II r-" \ I ! i, !-',---I,~---c..Jl,
-"I I,.f ' I --'----1" ~, , ~_
!", '........J~_,..___n__ i ':J[: i i ....i=,..-, ~
~ jl . -:~~ 1 I J------.LJ. ~
~ IIII~ L-,t; ; ~~'-~
~o
L_~
'---~
1-
\-
I
.i
L..-,
i '"L"!I
) !...-J.
I ,
NORTH DISTRICT
J l
\\ I
I
I
I
~
7P r.../
?ID
~"\7
~ii\
,.,,- .
~ .. 1
..A v !
V! e
8:. ~ ... 8-1', .
- :<i~',~' ~fi";~_' .';:;,-\'{j.',:-:..., 1>. _ ":~{';'I':_':
... . . ..,' .-..';~/, -. -', ~
--,
,~"~-f):-P~,.. : D
I i ;-~.. '1 i~"'''' ~
"I ...
kd.l ~~
'1 J1. ~
~
!
,
1
,
l
,
~
--~
r
,
~
~
i
t
,
j
~
.........~~ ~ .bo....-..~
..A>.-.~
f
-'1'1l_!II'WWoIC~
\
,
'~~~ ~-aos,:
}\'<>'::,
~,-
) u' LJj L.1
L-""":; '- -.. r~
F'""'[__~_~ I L..: ..J
;!'!"".
'.
.
effl
"--/
~f
)
) [--', ..,
\ ~
J l
--e..-,
... ,..," 1:;., .:t~~
""'~"",'
-.;>,"'" .;'~.~..
. -%~ ,> ~.
~. ;t ~,.
8~.;,~
'. ,~" ~',i
.. ,
~. :1:5
-~. - . ~"I"~
"~;"
I '. ~f'C.
~"
'," ,
.'
I
.
~
n
~~
~ ....', t~0 ""\.r;~~ -:-."r~~ -.;.''':-;. :1.
· il ..,1
;q "(" ~. !
,.~ ~
," \: 'b~
,,~ ; -&
I"~.'.~
..' "
;."
". '
"! ~~
.....f'<o
I:~",'
'1'-"
.~ . ..;
Iffi.
, ,
t." "~,'"
,'-' '"
-,.,-- ~
I \ _I .. 1 " H\
Lf O! 0, ,~c' ,~
c;1 L:1 b I ~ \ C'11 t:] l!:'i \ l"CJ fl
WEST DISTRICT
~!J[1
1&1 .
o
!:J
=
-= 0
QL~~
)[0 ) n
U~--t0.~
--...F
~~
i
.
~
I
'"
...~....
f-
.J;
..:. ~
... ..
1
.J
]:
:'
=-.....
j
?~-
.....
]- -
s
J
OPTi ON b
-..
o
ID
.--f- - .
,,! 00
wI
o
o
- .
\C6
iJ
18
~-
V I U
_.~. - ".. .' \
~ ""- ..
~. - ~.u..-.
~r_'"
j
'--
]
----- .~-
.,:<...
J
r-
]---'
oC~,
o '"",/\
~-
I' 0\1;
':4
~.C
-#'"
EAST DISTRICT
i -,."
J I
\".
'"
~
I
I
i
i
~
;
i
.
9
,
,
L ~- ~ 1
D
I
=
J
t
!
i
J
I
,
.
~
1
j
~
i
.
i
i
i
!
f
i
,.-.-. ..----".
I
I
1
~
, ,
o
i
t
~
f-
J
I
~
,
I
~
I
~
'-...
---
j
I
)
l
J
l
J
l
J
r-
I
~
4"!J
0,
I
,
()Pf!t)N
L
r
i
I
l.
~"--
J
I
J
l
l
J
l
_J
l
I
!
1
I
,
I
~.-o:'" .~
l~) p-r'., !"'\ A \
; ,~<. L~' ~
B~
,
I,:'.i,
, ,I
,. \i
!I
il
." 11
j ~ ~
I~
.'
~ -j
i
\
I
~~-..."
~ ~
--==-===-
~".
i; P
. ~~$'-'''''i<"b "A. !\..-,
1~ ,,~-~~~~!,""~
: ~ 1=~'I\~J~~:;1
. IC'+ ~~~;L"'~
I
I)
f1J\
(8)
(9Pf1ff)t~
f"'.. -..
03
e
CENTRAL DISTRICT
~ -1
~
~J
I
I
\..
\
----
,
J
----."
r
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
z\.\,)~
-;I:~-4
<J~>
n~<:)
.' :, :
'" \
JI
- -~
~
~
i
~
I
\
\
"--
J
-
-<
7-
\U1U
'-.)~
,~--<
I
I
,
!
, I i
j
i,
~
--, V", " 0
\, ',''J.,'."'.',' I,' 0,,' '
!<',.~,I "~
,. (("
. i\ ~
! t, \ "'-"=
! vL' '
'-.."-] ~"''-'.' ; j
~..
'-I dN~" .'
n ,,"'J:' ---'
,\ ,
j
, ,: :..
. ,- .
I
i
I
L-
I
j
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
,
!
I
I
" 1
I
\
\
I
,
\
i
I
!
;
j
I
1
~~:~',:~~. )
'.~'.' ;s ,~,_,::~~u',',"~'~.::.'.:~;:: ::"".~'.i~.,'~..:'.!:'~. .;;~}~.~('--.'.'.~~.'~';-:?~~,,,:,'~,,~ '~ ,'.....~. ......
- , ' .- "
.-.--
j L
r-
I
!
I
I
) I
/
I
I
I
!
i
i
r~-=~ .'..::.....:::
~-
... ------,
~" "
~
~
\
~'"/ 4;" I
," I~>' II
,,9' ',:J r::,~. " '., ..,,'
.-. ,: ' I
,", J j I
' ".-
~ ~.
.~
I
II I
li~
2
':7
!
101
. . ,
-=