pf_03120 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-..----- .. ';. .' -- EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE * * * * * * * * * * * * * (f) Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 29th day of June 1999, at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present: Mastel, Wiski, Maschka and the following were absent: Goedeke, Wall Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 9659 Resolution Approving a 17 foot Driveway Access Point (apron) Setback Variance at 2752 Matilda Street WHEREAS, Section 703.04B( 4) of the Roseville City Code requires a minimum driveway access point (apron) setback from a street corner of 30 feet; and WHEREAS, Russell Dansare, property owner, (hereinafter "applicant") ofthe lot at 2752 Matilda Street, has applied for a 17 foot variance to allow a reduction in the 30 foot required setback that would enable him to retain his driveway and street access (apron) in its current location; and WHEREAS, The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Matilda Street have prompted the variance request; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on Wednesday,june 9,1999, and recommended (6-0) approval ofthe requested variance; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation on Tuesday, June 29, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: 1. Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. 2. Due to the City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Matilda Street, Mr. Dansare was required to apply for a variance if he wanted to keep his driveway in its current location. 3. Relocating the access point to meet the 30 foot setback would require major modifications to the existing driveway as it extends to the garage. Resolution 9659 - Page 10f2 G\ O(~ &);.