My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03121
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:41:27 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:51:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 29th day of June 1999, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Wiski, Maschka <br />and the following were absent: Goedeke, Wall <br /> <br />Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 9658 <br />Resolution Approving a 9 foot Driveway Access Point (apron) <br />Setback Variance at 373 Maple Lane Court <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(4) of the Roseville City Code requires a minimum driveway <br />access point (apron) setback from a street corner of 30 feet; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Michael Dietz, property owner, (hereinafter "applicant") of the lot at 373 <br />Maple Lane Court, has applied for a 9 foot variance to allow a reduction in the 30 foot required <br />setback that would enable him to retain his driveway and street access (apron) in its current <br />location; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of <br />Woodbridge Street have prompted the variance request; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request <br />on Wednesday, June 9,1999, and recommended (6-0) approval of the requested variance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Tuesday, June 29, 1999; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to demonstrate <br />that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br /> <br />2. Due to the City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Maple <br />Land Court, Mr. Dietz was required to apply for a variance if he wanted to keep his <br />driveway in its current location. <br /> <br />3. The grade of the existing driveway exceeds a slope of 10% and if relocated the new <br />driveway would be even greater in order to match into the garage and roadway. <br /> <br />Resolution 9658 - Page 1 of 2 c:l\., <1\ <br /> <br />Co 1'0 ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.