pf_03123 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 I I I I 1 PROJECT~ACKrROUNID Mendota Homes h4 a purchase agreement for the vacant (former park:ng lot) parce~ located north of the fxecutive Manor Condos, 3155 Old Highway 8. The site is relatively flat, gradually sloping from the southwest to the northeast. There are no structures on the cu1ent parcel; the entire site is pavement. The portion of the l~t that lies in Roseville is 125 feet in width by 330.4 feet in depth or 41,300 square feet. The parcel is a small but a workable redevelopment site for a town house development.: The site was identified as Phase 2 ofthe original Mendota Homes PUD which included Phase 1, a 30 unit sen:or housing complex northeast of the Phase 2 proposal. I I The proposed architJcture will be single level stnctures with walkout cr lookcut basements and a hei~ht from the main floor of 2C feet. The exterior will be maintenance free siding and brickt metal fascia and soffit, and asphalt shingles. Gutters and downspouts will direct the rainwater and snow melt away from the site. Decks and/or patios are proposed With each structure. The fror_t of each town home and its two-stan garage will face south toward the Executive Manor Condo's. The estirr.ated vdue of the finished project is $11.5 to $1.8 million. , I Mendota Homes subkitted the required concept development plans, including site, drainage, landscape, and building elevations. Because the site is reducir.g the existing impervious site area ponding is not required. However, storm water will drain to the adjacent parcel, nortIieast of the proposal. The drainage pond on the previously approved three story, 30 unit cqndominium building has po~ding capacity for Phase 2. I The front yard is considered that west parcel bour_dary or that portion that lies adjacent to I the parcel within He$epin County. The side yards are considered the north and south parcel boundaries. 1lIe rear yard is the east parcei boundary. Setbacks for the site development are as fqllows: I jJFl!"ol!1lt Side Remr Parking Percent Lot ISetbadk Setback St)tback per unit Coverage Co die requirement (R-6) I 30 feet 15 feet 30 feet 2 stalls NA pun request I 11 feet* 6 feet* * 13 feet 4 stalls 75% * ** I This building setback) though considered a front yard, is an interior yard due to the lots I true frontage being provided via Hennepin C~unty and Old Highway 8. I The side yard buildin~ setback located to the nortt has been created to allow flexibility knowing that a deck may someday become a three season porch and then a four season porch, and allowance pf this modification without having to amend the FUD each time this change occurs. PF3123 - RCA (072699) Page 2 of 4 - . . e