pf_03123 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I plans are not the fi~al required architectural drawings necessary for inclusion with the PUD. Staff will wQrk with Mendota Homes on the necessary final architectural plans. . I 3.8 The PUD has been ~tten to allow a 10 unit town home development with an underlying zoning ofR-6, Towbhouse District and the setback reductions proposed in the attached plans. Easements for access and utilities rr:ust b~ in place from Old Highway 8 to serve all units, including ~he two (2) units in St Antho:1Y. I 3.9 The project as prop~sed is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plaq and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). I 3.10 The proposed project will not adversely affect th~ public health, safety, or general I welfare. I I 3.11 Final utility, lightin~, paving, grading, site, landscape, signage, and dra:nage plan mus~ be submitted and approyed by the City prior to document signature, recording, and building permit issuance. Th~ City ofSt. Anthony, prior to Roseville's recording of the PUD, must grant approval ffthe project. 3.12 Park dedication fees in lieu of land dedication wiJ I be collected at building permit issuance for each ne* town home unit constructed in Roseville at a rate $400.00 per llilit. . I I 4.0 ST AFJF REOOMMtNDA" 1I'ION . ! 4.1 Based on the review ~d conditions outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends approval of the amemJlment to Planned Unit DeveJopment (#1197), preliminary and final plat approval, and cortcept/final development plan approval in order to develop the vacant one (1) acre parking l~t located between Old Highway 8 and Highway 88, subject to the review and condition~ outlined in Section 3 of the Report for Council Action dated July 26, 1999. I I 5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION A<C1I'J[ON I I On July 14, 1999, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Mendota Homes request. At this hearing a number of residents living in the adjacent Executive Manor Con~os development addressed the Commission concemed with the setback from their strupture and the landscape screening. Staff suggested that Mendota Homes work with the residents that directly view Cower level) the town house site on innovative ways to scrren the development. The Planning Commission agreed and also wanted clarification oq. proposed setbacks, current site development allowance, parking requirements, and site tlrainage. Ms. Dorothy Ohnsorg thanked the Planning Commission and the d1eveloper for preparing a reduced density plan. Mr. Ray Malinar, _ President of Executive I Manor Condos Homeownen Association asked for imprcved .- mailed notices to residents of Condo Building "B". The Planning CoInIIi.ssion recommended (6-1) ap~roval of the request by Mendota Homes, subject to the review and I I PF3123 - RCA (072699) Page 4 of 4 i I I -