Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 Chair Klausing suggested two votes: one on the ordinance and one on flag lots <br />2 generally. <br />3 <br />4 Motion. Member Cunningham moved to table to the next Planning Commission <br />5 meeting until additional information could be gathered from existing property <br />6 adjacent to flag lots or proposed flag lots. <br />7 <br />8 Motion to table failed with no second. <br />9 <br />10 Thomas Paschke noted that the flag lot ordinance should apply to substandard frontage <br />11 lots with a "flag", not an "1" shaped lot with 85 feet, which would require additional <br />12 conditions on a permitted lot. <br />13 <br />14 Member Egli suggested a 70-foot frontage for flag lots (30 feet setback plus 40 foot <br />15 frontage). <br />16 <br />17 Member Mulder asked for clarification of the 85-foot flag lot frontage requirement. <br />18 <br />19 Motion. Member Egli moved, seconded by Member Cunningham, to amend the <br />20 existing motion to a minimum frontage of 70 feet. <br />21 <br />22 Member Wilke found a percentage more effective. <br />23 J\yes:4 <br />24 Nays: 2 <br />25 <br />26 Motion. Member Klausing moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to recommend <br />27 approval of the proposed ordinance on flag lots with a minimum frontage of flag <br />28 lots of 70 feet. <br />29 <br />30 Ayes: 3, Egli, Cunningham, Klausing <br />31 Nays: 3, Wilke, Olson, Mulder <br />32 Motion died. <br />33 <br />34 Motion. Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to send the <br />35 proposed ordinance as amended, with 70 feet of minimum flag lot frontage, to the <br />36 City Council without a recommendation from the Planning Commission. <br />37 <br />38 J\yes: 5 <br />39 Nays: 1 <br />40 <br />41 Member Olson and Egli stressed that additional public input was needed. <br />42 <br />