pf_03140 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

!, ~ti~.t;:fJ'\.:R'~~'~..&~_:':.;j.., , rI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . .....-~",-._~,..........."fJ 2.0 Notes on hackground . 2.2 We \V1,sh to replace the 12' x 16' detached accessory structure W1th an addition to the existing stngle famHy dwelling that Vt/1.11 proVide an improved str\lC'.tu re for Yf'<tr round use as an office. as well as iInprovtng the area to the west side of the house \V1th a solanum. The request does not increase thc lmperv10us 511 rfce' coverage. 2.4 The new ;loc!1rlon cfo~s not n~t:'d to 1nclttde an extra bedroom in addtt1n to (he office which C8n be converted as the need aLises. The architect suggested thts as part o/3n addition made simple from a construction \oi.ewpolnt. However, this W(lS not part of thc original request. Without thc replacement of the accessory building we need to reconsider the best way of impro\oi.ng this space to get more use out of it - this space was one of the reasons we purchased the house In the first place, ':\C'w draH'~ngs nccd to be submitted to renect the or1glnal requesr proper}y 2.5 The tmpcr\-iou5 surface coverage would not be altered by the request for a valiance, The extsmg accessory building and concrete to thc west sldc of thc house alrcad:: ("'(')\.'(;[ more area th8.n W~ proposf' for th~ house addition 3.2 See comrnent~ under 2.5, The propDsal would not exceed exist1ng tmpervious sllrfacc coverage. This also applies to 3.5. . 3.6 We do nOT know what the general purpose and intent 1s of the CIty'S Comprehensive PIon and Title 10 of the Cit~y Code (zoning) means but as per discussions with City Planner Kim Lee, and Chief Code Enforcement Officer Gordon Bcscth. it was communicated that replacement of the existing accessory strl\cture with a permanent add1l1un would be an Improvement over the present sit uatin and would therefore likely be approved. This is the variance we arc requesting. ~ ,0 ~()tlld snm('one please explilin ho\v the proposed variance (if modified as per origtnal request) would adversely affect the publie health, safety or general welfare? Lea\1ng the exiSting structure in pla.ce presumably doesn't do this and addldln~ a solarium presumably doesn't do thiS? 4.0 Please dC'lay recommendations and reView until a revised set of drawings have been prepared. .