Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />- <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />. <br />- <br />* <br />- <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />'{j) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1.0 Introduction <br /> <br />The Kadrie site is situated on tile la..~eshore of Lake Josephine in Rosevillc, Ramsev <br />J <br /> <br />Coumy, Minnesota. The lando\vncr has 2.pp:-ox.:mately lOO' of lakeshore along the soutb <br />side of the lake. The lakcshore ha.s been experiencing and cOIlti.nues to experieuce <br />significant loss of land due to water and ice action. Two large stately trees are currently <br />being threatened (see letter in Appendix A) and there is an immediate need to protec':: this <br />lakeshore. <br /> <br />The Non-Point Engineering Assistance Program staff was requested to do a design <br />that would solve this lakeshore erosion problem. The following section describes the <br />design and design criteria. <br /> <br />2.0 Desig:;. Conside:-QD.on <br /> <br />2.1 btroduc~ion <br />The solution for iliis hkesl:.ore prc:ection was based on :he successful applicmim: <br />of thi~ technique on lakes in. the r:orcher:l :::.~t.:'opolit~ area of ~1inne<l?olis/S:. Paul. The <br />solution is detailed in the preparcc. Fl~s ar:d specific::ltions providd for this project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In summary, the design uses a boulder berm comprising of two courses of large <br />boulders of minimum diameter 24 inches. Each boulder is approximately 900 lbs in <br />weight. Stones of size approximmely 8 inch;:'s to 12 inches will be hand placed between <br />the boulders and between the bouiders and the gravel backf1ll. Topsoil will be added over <br />this grave! and stone area, and the ar:2. will be seeded with a grass mix. Soil <br />bioengineering will be done on the bank. to add further protection to this lakeshore, aml this <br />will be in the form of trees and shrubs. The following sections describe some of the design <br />criteria. <br /> <br />2.2 Aesthetics <br />The selected design is the preferred alternative to this lake shore site for aesthetical <br />reasons. It represents the lowest impact to the landscape when compared to a typical riprap <br />design which would require a significant length of riprap going up most of the bank. This <br />design leaves the land in a vegetative state that would retain a narorallandscape look. ':\he <br />trees and shrubs will provide shade in the lake and promote fish habitat. This design <br />adheres to the Department of Narur3l ResoU!'ces (Dl'I"'R) requirement for a minimal irn.pact . <br />solution, see DNR rules Section 6115.0202 Subp 5 A. This design also adheres to (he <br />