My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03140
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03140
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:44:37 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:53:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 25th day of October 1999, at 6:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Council Member <br /> <br />Resolution No. <br />Resolution Approving a Shoreland Setback Variance <br />at 1281 Josephine Road <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1016.16A of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance requires structures (new <br />buildings and decks) to have a minimum setback of 75 feet from Shoreline; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the definition of shoreline is the Ordinary High Watermark or OHW; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the original non-conforming house was setback 37 feet from the shoreline and <br />the kitchen addition setback 26 feet 6 inches from the shoreline; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1016.22B of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance states that additions or <br />expansions to non-conforming structures must meet the height, setback, and other requirements <br />of the City Code, unless authorized by a variance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1016.22C of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance states that deck <br />expansions on non-conforming structures may be allowed if: the house was built prior to March <br />27, 1974; no reasonable alternative deck location could be found; and, the proposed deck <br />extension would not exceed 15 % of the existing structure setback from the lake or be closer than <br />30 feet, whichever is the greater setback; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Kadrie's request is for a three (3) foot wide encroachment (maintenance <br />deck) to a point 23 feet 6 inches from the original shoreline; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday, October 13, 1999, and recommended (7-0) approval of the requested <br />variance, subject to the removal of any deck improvement currently existing on the property that <br />encroaches closer to the shoreline that 23 feet 6 inches. (29 feet 6 inches from the repaired <br />shoreline); and <br /> <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.