Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br /> <br />restaurant. The development changes diffel-from the estimates withlntheBRWstudy by <br />the following amounts: . .,' . . <br />. The proposed d,evelopmertt has.increased by 5~,445sq1iare feet compared to the' <br />BRWevaluation. This is' an iricrease of9J)%.,'.. . _ , .' <br />. The proposed development is expected to'generate 6,445 daily trips. This represents <br />a decrease of944 trips per day from the BRW estimatesforadecrease of 12.8%.' . <br />. " The proposed development is~xpected to generate 804 PM 'peak hour trip~. This <br />represents an increase' of 17 trips during the PM peak hour from the BR W .estimates <br />for an increase of2.2%. . " <br /> <br />The BR W study volumes were 'used as the base line to measure the anticipated impa~ts <br />from increased traffic associated with the development along this section of Cleveland ' <br />Avenue. Their study findi'ng was, ,"there are expected to be no significant traffic impacts <br />associated with the proposed CentrePo.inte development. The minor impacts Identified <br />in this analysis' are attnbuted to backgrou~d cOnditions 'and would be expected to occur ' <br />with or without the Centre.Pointe development." . <br /> <br />Since the ,proposed Centre Pointe Busjness Park development is' expected to generate <br />slightly more PM peak hour traffic than was. estimated by BR W for this site, it is <br />anticipated that the operation of the suIToundi,ng intersections not 'change: ' <br />. , <br /> <br />, , <br />In conclusion, we offer the following:, <br /> <br />f ,. _. . <br />'. The proposed businesses.are exp~cted to gen~rate sljghtly more traffic during the PM <br />peak hour, but less daily traffic~ than the BRWstUdy had eS,timated ~d evaluated for '" <br />this site on Cleveland Avenue within their study. '" <br />. It is anticipated that the prpposed de~elopmerit Will not 'adversely impact the., '. <br />intersectibns in the area ,and the)1'will operate within the ranges indicated by, the BRW <br />report. ' <br /> <br />AirINoise Quality, " . <br />As part of the original EAW a study of potential impacts of vehicle related air;and noise <br />emissions was contacted by Braun Intertec.' Based on the above traffic'analysis arid the <br />reduced tramc vol~mes outlined in the original EA W, RLK concludes that there will be <br />no adverse impact to the existing air, and noise quality in'the area. The MPCA will make <br />a fina:I determinatiqrl'duri,ng the review'ofthe ISP. <br />-'\ . <br /> <br />Sto~water ManagementIWetlandImpacts: . "', . . . <br />The proposed sitewill be deyelopedwith approximat~ly\ 75% impervious slirface~' The <br />development of the site will 'be consistent with the original design data prepared by RLK <br />as part of the master grading and storrnwater management." ,.,. <br /> <br />, The overall qrainage patterns and pond characteristics:will be consistent'~ith the original .' <br />design calCulations. The pr<;>posed design will collect off site. stormwater disch~ged. into. <br />