My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03154
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03154
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:47:21 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 3:55:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />The following tables summarize the STAMINA 2.0 model results for development <br />for the 2004 projections (daytime impacts) at the intersections of both Cleveland <br />and Co. Rd. C and Cleveland and Co. Rd. D. <br /> <br />1 <br />l <br /> <br />County Road D and Cleveland STAMINA 2.0 Noise Modeling Results <br /> Daytime Peak Hours <br />Receptor LIO (dBA) L50 (dBA) <br /> Development I Baseline Development I Baselin <br />1 Proposed Office 59.4 55.8 <br />2 Proposed Office 58.7 55.3 <br />3 Hotel 59.0 55.6 <br />4 Office 59.0 55.6 <br />5 Residential 70.0 64.6 <br />6 Residential 69.4 62.8 <br />7 OfficelWH 68.7 62.3 <br /> <br />j <br />1 <br /> <br />County Road C and Cleveland STAMINA 2.0 Noise Modeling Results <br /> Daytime Peak Hours <br />Receptor LlO (dBA) L50 (dB A) <br /> Development I Baseline Development I Baselin <br />1 Proposed Office 60.7 57.6 <br />2 Proposed Office 59.8 56.8 <br />3 Hotel 59.9 56.8 <br />4 Office 59.8 56.6 <br />5 Residential 69.2 63.4 <br />6 Residential 70.6 64.5 <br />7 OfficelWH 70.1 64.2 <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />This analysis indicates that predicted noise levels near Receptors 5 and 6 exceed the <br />state Residential Daytime L 1 0 and L50 limits. However, these predictions also <br />indicate that the additional traffic generated by the development will result in noise <br />levels that are moderately lower than those currently existing (see monitoring results <br />above). Please refer to the Figure 10 for noise modeling receptor locations. It <br />should be understood that the receptor locations used for the air quality analysis <br />were the same as those implemented for the noise level analysis. <br /> <br />'1 <br />\ <br />.J <br /> <br />It is anticipated that the proposed additional elevations to the existing buildings <br />will help mitigate some of the noise produced by Interstate 35W. <br /> <br />Page 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.