Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />..~ <br />,~ <br />i <br />'I <br />i <br /> <br />---- -- -----,--- <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />~ <br />.; <br /> <br />Roseville Planni~g Commission Minutes <br />october 1, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />The architect from the project proceeded to explain his landscape <br />plan to the Planning Commission members. Moeller pointed out that <br />poured in place curbing was required. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked whether the existing owner supports the project. <br />Matthews replied that the current owners do support the expansion. <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />whether planting <br />development along <br />propose to do any <br /> <br />! <br />t <br />\ <br /> <br />Berry, referring to the 1983 approval, asked <br />wasn't to be considered on the north side of the <br />Woodhill. Matthews replied that Group W did not <br />landscaping on the north. <br /> <br />Mildred Jackson, 1000 Woodhill, stated she was opposed to the <br />project, as there is currently too much activity on Woodhill right <br />now. She also asked what additional activity will be occurring in <br />the building. Matthews replied that more administrative <br />activities will occur. Jackson replied she thought it was a <br />mistake to allow this development in 1983, and it is a mistake <br />today. <br /> <br />'\ <br /> <br />i;t <br /> <br />Wiski asked what the primary hours of operation were at the site. <br />Matthews replied primarily between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., but <br />there are people in the facilities over an eighteen hour time <br />period. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Dahlgren pointed out that this Special Use Permit that is being <br />requested allows moderate impact uses in public schools. A <br />Special Use now is simply required to expand the parking. Mr. <br />Dahlgren also pointed out that all of the landscaping requirements <br />pursuant to the 1983 approval have been met. <br /> <br />wi ski reviewed the twelve items that were included in the 1983 <br />approval, and confirmed the point that these items will still <br />apply, irregardless of what happens with the current requcot. <br />---- <br /> <br />asked what the total parking capacity would be after the <br />Matthews replied approximately one hundred thirty-two~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />, Goedeke seconded, approval of Group W Ca e's <br />request for Special Use Permit at 934 Woodhill Drive with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />The drainage and landscape plans be approved by staff, <br />Poured in place curbing is required. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />.\ <br /> <br />3. That "Right Turn Only" signs be placed at the three driveways. <br /> <br />Berry reiterated the fact that she was very uncomfortable with the <br />three driveway approach. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Moeller, Goedeke, Maschka, Johnson, and Wiski. <br />Nays: Berry. <br /> <br />