2014-08-26_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

have much impact on demand charges as community solar systems are not measuring demand against production, and if impugning demand in an applicable retail rate, the business gets credit on a per KW basis, which was much more attractive for commercial versus residential customers, and gave them an advantage. Public Comment Sara Barsel (and Randy Neprash), 1276 Eldridge Avenue Ms. Barsel asked if a municipal facility installed solar on their roof, would it be considered commercial or a different category. Mr. Ross responded that it would depend on which of the different roles came into play for developing a community solar system,just like other types of developer as previously referenced: whether the City serves as the developer, builder, financier, customer, or host; but clarified that the role was defined by subscriber not by the location of the system. At the request of Mr. Schwartz, Mr. Ross confirmed that, under the tariff, different rates applied depending on the type of subscriber on the same system, with a minimum purchase required under State law per subscriber, theoretically equivalent to one solar panel per customer, and treated as if on your roof whether you were a commercial or residential subscriber. At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Ross clarified that the City could serve in a regulatory role if private individuals or companies (e.g. developers) in the community chose to install solar systems without City involvement, or the City could be more involved to make things more streamlined, or any other role as previously identified. As noted by Member Seigler, if the City did not become involved and allowed solar installations, they could essentially be giving away an asset if a system was installed on their roof. However, as noted by Mr. Schwartz, under that scenario, there would also be no cost to the City except for installing the system, with Mr. Ross pointing out that the onus of anything on the solar system would require a subscription manager or an agreement put in place for roof maintenance or replacement (e.g. depreciation and tax credits going directly to the developer), but providing a revenue stream for the City as host. Member Seigler questioned if it would be prudent for the City to give a public building roof away, as a potential asset, if the private developer would make a profit from it versus the City. With the entire solar energy field forging new ground, Mr. Ross noted the many options available, but the need for a process and established standards for community solar systems, as not only local vendors and in-state developers, but vendors from other states and/or countries, tapping into this opportunity. While many of those companies have experience installing the solar systems, Mr. Ross opined that the other trick was to establish how well the solar systems would be Page 5 of 15